innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education at muse
Post on 25-Feb-2017
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [Eastern Michigan University]On: 09 October 2014, At: 18:44Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of the Chinese Institute of EngineersPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tcie20
Innovation and entrepreneurship in engineeringeducation at MUSER. Radharamanan a & Jeng-Nan Juang aa School of Engineering, Mercer University , Macon, GA 31207, USAPublished online: 07 Dec 2011.
To cite this article: R. Radharamanan & Jeng-Nan Juang (2012) Innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education atMUSE, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 35:1, 25-36, DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2012.624797
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2012.624797
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Journal of the Chinese Institute of EngineersVol. 35, No. 1, January 2012, 25–36
Innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education at MUSE
R. Radharamanan* and Jeng-Nan Juang
School of Engineering, Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207, USA
(Received 19 April 2010; final version received 2 June 2010)
Traditionally, business schools are known to promote entrepreneurship education in their undergraduate andgraduate programs. To meet the challenges due to advances in technology in the twenty-first century andentrepreneurial competition from developing nations, such as India and China, entrepreneurship programs inengineering education are being developed through grants from public and private foundations in order topromote entrepreneurial mindsets among all graduating engineers. This article highlights one such entrepre-neurship engineering education program established at the Mercer University School of Engineering (MUSE)through Kern family foundation grants in 2007. What is currently being done at MUSE in promotingentrepreneurial mindsets among undergraduate and graduate students is highlighted and presented in terms ofcurriculum development, entrepreneurship clubs for engineering students, and entrepreneurial design projectswith innovation and creativity components? This article presents the entrepreneurship engineering educationcurriculum in place at MUSE and a typical senior design project ‘Retrofitting of Tabletop CNC Lathe’undertaken by senior engineering students through this program. The results obtained from this senior designproject, the difficulties encountered by the student team, and the successful completion of the project arehighlighted and discussed.
Keywords: engineering education; innovation and creativity; entrepreneurship; retrofitting
1. Introduction
In the recent years, entrepreneurship education andresearch has focused a great deal of attention onopportunity recognition as a key aspect of research andpractice (Sager and Dowling 2009). The field ofentrepreneurship has been defined as the ‘study ofthe sources of opportunities; the process of discovery,evaluation, and exploitation of opportunities’(Shane and Venkataraman 2000). The entrepreneurhas been described as ‘an innovator or developer whorecognizes and seizes opportunities, converts theseopportunities into workable and/or marketable ideas’(Kuratko 1995).
Observations have been made on the changing roleof universities in society (Sanz-Velasco andSaemundsson 2008). The importance of entrepreneur-ship education has been emphasized in business andengineering schools (Bygrave and Zacharakis 2008,Hisrich et al. 2008). Entrepreneurship requires learningmethods, pedagogical processes, and frames for edu-cation (Blanker et al. 2008). Managing innovation,integrating technological, market, and organizationalchange have been studied (Clase 2007, Tidd and
Bessant 2009). Design for manufacture and assembly
and concurrent engineering concepts have been
addressed in technology ventures and engineering
entrepreneurship education (Boothroyd et al. 2002,
Anderson 2008, Dorf and Byers 2008).In addition to the traditional roles of knowledge
production and diffusion through research and teach-
ing, universities have become more actively involved in
the commercialization of knowledge (Sanz-Velasco
and Saemundsson 2008). Creation of academic ven-
tures and business incubation has received increased
attention lately (Gaspar 2009, Messica and Agmon
2009, Timmons and Spinelli 2009). Academic ventures
are seen as important means for enhancing local
economic development, generating income to support
research, and encouraging inventor involvement
(Shane 2004).With the changing role of universities, the role of
academics has also changed. From being more likely
to have the role of advisors, facilitating the transfer of
knowledge to the new venture, they are today more
likely to be members of the entrepreneurial team; thus,
playing greater roles in identifying and developing the
*Corresponding author. Email: Radharaman_r@mercer.edu
ISSN 0253–3839 print/ISSN 2158–7299 online
� 2012 The Chinese Institute of Engineers
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2012.624797
http://www.tandfonline.com
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
entrepreneurial opportunities, acquiring resources,and organizing the venture (Sanz-Velasco andSaemundsson 2008).
2. Entrepreneurship program at Mercer University
School of Engineering
The entrepreneurship certificate program establishedthrough Kern Family Foundation Grants in 2007 isopen to all engineering students at Mercer UniversitySchool of Engineering (MUSE). Students who com-plete the course requirements will receive a Certificateof Achievement in Engineering Entrepreneurship. Theentrepreneurship certificate program requires comple-tion of the following courses:
. MKT 361: Principles of Marketing,
. MGT 363: Principles of Management,
. MGT 427: Entrepreneurship,
. EGR 482: Engineering Innovation andCreativity,
. EGR 483: Entrepreneurship in EngineeringDesign.
Note: EGR 482 must be taken with EGR 487:Engineering Design Exhibit I and EGR 483 must betaken with EGR 488: Engineering Design Exhibit II.
In addition to the above courses, the engineeringstudents are encouraged to take ECN 150: Principles ofMicroeconomics during their sophomore year. Table 1shows the course taken by semester to complete thecertificate program in entrepreneurship. The catalogdescriptions of the entrepreneurship certificate pro-gram courses are found in the Mercer UniversityCatalog (2009).
Also, the Mercer Entrepreneurship Club has beenestablished to promote innovation, creativity, andentrepreneurial activities among engineering studentsas well as across the Mercer Campus. Students from allengineering disciplines are actively engaged in anumber of entrepreneurial activities throughout theyear: recruiting students to the entrepreneurship pro-gram, participating in the entrepreneurship certificateprogram, taking entrepreneurship-related courses, par-ticipating in entrepreneurial senior design projects,
listening to successful entrepreneurs through invitedspeakers and seminars, developing business plans andcompeting in design and business plan competitions,promoting campus wide entrepreneurial activitiesduring national entrepreneurship week, raising fundsto participate and present technical papers on theirsenior design and business plans through ‘cookout’lunches and dinners and selling T-shirts that weredesigned and made by entrepreneurship club students,and presenting technical papers at national and inter-national conferences.
3. Retrofitting of tabletop computer numerically
controlled lathe
As machine tools age and their existing controllers fail,the machine tools must be either modernized orscrapped. This project details the infusion of newtechnology and the resulting extended useful life of acomputer numerically controlled (CNC) tabletoplathe. This study was undertaken as a senior designproject by a group of senior engineering students atMUSE. Key to the success of the project was theability to have a low cost, high performance real-timecontroller that was compatible with the existingelectrical components of the lathe. The CNC lathewas more that 15 years old with no available replace-ment parts from the original vendor. EnhancedMachine Controller (EMC) Project software(LinuxCNC.org 2007) installed on a personal com-puter running an Ubuntu Linux Operating System(2007) was the basis of the new controller design. Thestudents were able to deliver a completely functionaltabletop CNC lathe along with a user manual toaddress operation and use of the EMC software indepth. Artifacts were created using G-codes fromexisting models.
With the aging of existing machine tool controllers,a suitable replacement for improved functionality andlife extension is necessary. By renovating the controllerarchitecture and user interface, many machine toolscan continue to be useful manufacturing tools. A teamof four engineering seniors at MUSE tackled thisproblem by revitalizing a CNC tabletop lathe that was
Table 1. Course taken by semester.
Sophomore-1 Sophomore-2 Junior-1 Junior-2 Senior-1 Senior-2
EGR 480 EGR 487 EGR 488MGT 427 EGR 482 EGR 483
(ECN 150) MKT 361MGT 363
Note: 1: Fall semester; 2: spring semester.
26 R. Radharamanan and J.-N. Juang
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
defunct because of controller failure in two axes and
the lack of cost effective replacement components.
Little attempt to repair the lathe had been made since
1992. The students working on the project completed a
system design, then constructed and tested it for their
capstone design course. This article details the overall
system design including the CNC lathe, the EMC2
software, system integration, and operational results
obtained.Figure 1 illustrates the end goal of the project and
outlines the high level interaction between entities. The
computer is controlled with EMC2 software specifi-
cally designed to take user input and manipulate any
CNC machine in order to produce a desired part. The
actions of the machine are also recorded and fed back
into the computer to inform the user of its progress.
The computer then relays this information to the user
via EMC2’s graphical interface. The user at anytime
may wish to terminate/pause the program, and can do
so either through the software interface, or through the
emergency stop button on the front panel of the lathe.
3.1. Deliverables, goals, and criteria
The project’s end goal consisted of a working lathe
with a computer interface and a user manual. All
malfunctioning parts were repaired or replaced.
Functional safety features such as an emergency stop
and safety covers were added. A computer interface
compatible with the lathe and G-code usage was
implemented. Lastly, a user manual was created to
instruct a student in basic operations of the interface
and lathe.Repairing this lathe was an excellent method for
students of various engineering specialties to demon-
strate and extend their knowledge and ability to work
as a team. An additional motivation was to produce afunctional educational tool.
3.2. CNC tabletop lathe description
This section describes the CNC tabletop lathe that wasredesigned in this project. An outline of all keycomponents and controls is detailed. The CNC table-top lathe revitalized in this study is a four-axis machinetool, originally equipped with a dedicated controller.
It is important to note that some aspects of themachine not updated, such as some features of theelectrical systems and technical specifications, are notcovered in this article. These details may be found inStarturn Installation (1990).
As seen in Figure 2, the outer casing of the CNCtabletop lathe consists of several main components:spindle, spindle speed control, safety cover, emergencystop, spindle motor, stepper motors (X and Z tool postdirections), headstock, and tailstock. An overheadview is provided in Figure 3.
The spindle can rotate in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction as desired by the user. The green‘Start’ button on the bottom left of Figure 2 and theadjacent red ‘Stop’ button functions are also availablevia the computer interface, as well as on the controlpanel. Figure 4 depicts the stepper motor and side viewof the CNC lathe.
3.3. EMC2 software
The EMC2 software is a multi-purpose, Linux-based,CNC program. The goal of the CNC program is tointerface a computer with machine tools, such as mills,routers, or lathes. In this project, EMC2 was used asthe software interface between the host computer andthe CNC tabletop lathe. The EMC2 software has been
Emergency shut-Off
Input of code
Graphical interface
Execution of commands
Progress of program
Figure 1. System interaction flow diagram.
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 27
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
configured to match the needs of a typical latheoperator using a graphical user interface (GUI).Applications of the software have been an active areaof research and discussion (Kommareddy 2000).
Several modes of operation are available within theEMC2 software, which completely change the way inwhich EMC2 operates. Manual, auto, and manual datainput (MDI) are the possible operational modes.Manual mode causes EMC2 to act like a digital controlpanel, similar to using hand wheels or switches.If preferred, an entire G-code program can be entered
and executed in the auto mode. Lastly, MDI mode canbe used for entering blocks of G-code and executingthem piece by piece. An Ubuntu Linux distribution ora GNU-Linux distribution is required to runEMC2, V2.0. Linux has a real-time kernel as part ofits normal installation, and EMC2 requires aGNU-Linux Operating System (Ubuntu LinuxOperating System 2007).
A typical configuration selection window from thesoftware is depicted in Figure 5, while an axismovement and control screen is shown in Figure 6.
Figure 3. Overhead view of CNC lathe.
Figure 2. Four-axis CNC tabletop lathe.
28 R. Radharamanan and J.-N. Juang
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
4. Machining on CNC lathe
One of the important concepts to grasp when consid-
ering controlling the operation of the CNC tabletop
lathe is the coordinate system in which the machine
operates. Figure 7 outlines both the X-axis and Z-axis
with respect to the machine hardware. These directions
can be controlled manually or via the programmed
user interface (previously explained). A click of the
mouse will adjust the X-axis and Z-axis locations and
those coordinates will be displayed on the computer
monitor.
As seen in Figure 7, increasing distance in the
X-direction (i.e., a positive movement), will cause the
tool bit to move into the part. This is useful in facing
off operations which will be explained later on in
the manual. Additionally, decreasing distance in the
X-direction (i.e., a negative movement) will back the
tool bit away from the material being machined. These
actions, movement along the Z-axis, becomes neces-
sary, in order to achieve a desired location for the
cutting tool. In other words, it is necessary to move in
the negative X-direction to reposition the cutting tool
Figure 5. EMC2 configuration selector screen.
Figure 4. Side view with stepper motor.
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 29
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
without actually making a cut in the material beingmachined. Similarly, increasing distance in theZ-direction (i.e., a positive movement) will result in ashift to the right. Conversely, decreasing distance in theZ-direction (i.e., a negative movement) will result in ashift to the left. This operation is utilized duringturning operations. This reduces the diameter of thematerial being machined and is an integral process ingeneral machining.
It should be noted that this lathe cannot beadjusted in the (vertical) Y-direction, which would
appear as the axis going into and out of the figure(unlabeled, third axis in Figure 7) while the machine isrunning. Neither the use of G-code nor manualcontrols will allow movement in the Y positive ornegative direction. The hardware must be correctlypositioned prior to machining to ensure that theY-direction (height) is properly set for correct machin-ing operations. In the case of the CNC tabletop lathe,the standard cutting tool appears as a triangular prism,as shown in Figure 8. This particular tool is used in the
Figure 7. Tool post showing X-axis and Z-axis.
Figure 6. EMC2 display areas.
Figure 8. Cutting tool.
30 R. Radharamanan and J.-N. Juang
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
machining of wax material used in classroom orlaboratory.
4.1. PC to CNC lathe hardware interface
The last step in completing the new Linux PCcontroller for the lathe is the physical connectionbetween the PC and the CNC electrical devices. Theparallel port was used for data and signal communi-cation between the lathe and the PC.
The EMC2 software data can be configured to useexisting PC input/output hardware, such as the parallelport or serial port. Pin-out configurations of theparallel port were edited to provide correct informa-tion to and from the computer. To complete theconnection between the PC and CNC lathe, a breakoutboard prototype was designed using a bread board toconnect to the PC parallel port. The parallel port andcable gave high data communication integrity to the
lathe, and demonstrated accurate lathe motionresponses to the commands of the software.As expected, the stepper motors moved the tool postexactly as the G-code program indicated. Figure 9depicts the parallel port to lathe signal paths. A wire-wrapped breakout board was then used to take thebread board’s place. Tests were formulated to deter-mine the accuracy of the hardware and software.Necessary adjustments were made to ensure the pre-cision of the lathe. After all tests were completed to asatisfactory level, a more permanent finalized printedcircuit board (PCB) version of the breakout board wasfabricated and permanently installed into the lathe.
An optocoupler was used to protect and link thePC parallel port output signal line to the lathe steppercontrol board input lines, as shown in Figure 10. Foursuch optocouplers were used for each motor.
Four optocouplers were combined onto one board,with routed wires to appropriate resistors and screwposts. The optocouplers were connected to the parallel
Figure 10. Optocoupler design.
Figure 9. Parallel port to lathe signal paths.
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 31
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
port pins through 330V resistors, wires connected
optocouplers to the lathe controller board pins via
1 kV resistors. A common ground was also used.While all optocouplers and resistors were wire
wrapped onto the board, the two screw posts were
soldered on because they were unsuitable for wire
wrapping. The finished prototype breakout board is
shown in Figure 11; the blue screw head connects to
parallel port pins whereas the orange screw head
connects to controller pins.To build a durable and compact breakout board
for permanent installation into the lathe, the freeware
version of EAGLE Layout Editor was employed
(EAGLE PCB Layout Editor 2007), a powerful tool
for designing PCBs. First, the breakout board sche-
matic was drawn using the Schematic Editor. It can be
noticed in Figure 12 that optocouplers 4N35 were used
instead of 4N26 simply because the freeware version of
EAGLE Layout Editor does not include the footprint
of 4N26. However, according to the General Purpose
6-Pin Phototransistor Optocouplers data sheet, 4N35
and 4N26 have identical footprints (6 pin DIP).
Therefore, using 4N35 optocouplers on the Schematic
Editor still produced an accurate board layout.Then, a set of pin heads for the screw post was
custom designed to connect to the controller pins,
because the screw post collected from the discarded,
original mother board was used, as EAGLE Layout
Editor does not have the component footprint in its
library. Figure 13 shows the finished PCB layout.This finalized PCB layout was then processed
through CircuitCAM 5.1.692. Text notes for each
optocoupler were added onto the CAM layout, a final
text message stating the purpose and construction date
of the breakout board was also added. After final
inspection, the breakout board design was sent to
BoardMaster 5.1.692 to begin the fabrication process
using the LPKF Laser & Electronics Photo Mat 542
PCB Milling Machine. After the breakout board was
fabricated (Figure 14), all components were soldered to
complete the board for installation.To install this board, the pre-designated area for
‘Computer Link’ on the back cover of the lathe was
modified, and the parallel port was secured with a
bracket. The CNC controller was connected to the
screw terminals of the breakout board, and DB-25
connector was linked to a PC parallel port using a
standard cable. The external and internal views of
breakout board installation are shown in Figures 15
and 16, respectively.
Figure 12. EAGLE schematic layout.
Figure 11. Top view of prototype breakout board.
32 R. Radharamanan and J.-N. Juang
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
Finally, as the last step of installation, both theelectrical and mechanical components were thoroughlycleaned, and oil was applied to critical parts. Thestepper controller boards were secured to the baseboard. The relay board was also fastened and secured.To complete the mechanical installation, the electricalcomponents were fitted under the housing and allnecessary covers were applied.
4.2. Testing: creation of wax material artifact
Initial testing of each axis for calibration and accuracywas completed. An example program included with theEMC2 package, called lathe.ngc, was implemented totest the machining capability on a wax cylinder. It hasa graphical simulation, as shown in Figure 17. One canface-off the end of a cylinder, locate the center of the
material, and leave the tool tip at that position to beginthe program and machining. EMC2’s manual controlwas used to home both the X-axis and the Z-axis. Theprogram, lathe.ngc, was loaded and executed. It isimportant to note that Emergency Stop buttons on thefront panel of the lathe were also integrated to safelystop the machining process, if necessary.
4.3. Linear movement tests
After the first linear movement test (Amato et al. 2007)was conducted on the Z-axis, it was obvious that therewas a significant amount of inaccuracy: 0.77 inch ofZ-axis movement instead of the intended 1 inch. Alarge amount of inaccuracy was also revealed duringthe X-axis test. It was believed that this inaccuracy wasa result of software calibration error. Because EMC2software was installed on the PC without steppermotor options configured in the home directory, it wasoperating under default calibration settings. The GUIhas a calibration function under the machine menutab. There are three values in the calibration window:
INPUT_SCALE: 4000.0STEPGEN_MAXVEL: 1.4STEPGEN_MAXACCEL: 21.0
STEPGEN_MAXVEL is a value applied to thestepper pulse generator to provide a new velocitylimit for following error correction. STEPGEN_MAXACCEL is the new acceleration limit for thestepper pulse generator in following error correctionmode. INPUT_SCALE is the number of pulsesrequired to move the axis one UNIT (inch).
The value of 4000 for INPUT_SCALE means thatthe software’s pulse generator is outputting 4000 pulsesfor every inch the G-code entry is commanding. But,4000 pulses were not sufficient to allow the steppermotors to move the tool post (1 inch, but roughly
Figure 13. Finished PCB layouts.
Figure 14. Finished breakout board.
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 33
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
0.77 inch instead). Therefore, the input scale’s firstvalue was adjusted.
The stepper motor requires 200 steps to completeone revolution. Each steppermotor was equippedwith agear box, geared to specific ratio through the attach-ment of timing belts. The selected approach to attain thecorrect motor parameters was based on the followinglogic. It was observed that 4000 pulses produce a traveldistance of approximately 0.77 inch (instead of thedesired 1 inch) or 77% of 1 unit, then 4000 pulses was77% of what was needed to produce a travel distance of1 inch. A simple ratio gave a sufficiently accurateapproximation for the number of pulses to begin atrial-and-error test run (number of pulses needed for1 inch of travel on the X-axis was 5195).
During the trial-and-error runs, the scale value wasedited; a scale value of 5190 pulses per revolution wasattained. The Z-axis test was conducted again to verifythe distance the tool bit traveled on a wax cylinder.Using a measured distance for reference, the commandmove of 1 inch produced a travel distance of 1.001 inch.With an acceptable error rate of less than 0.003 inch, itwas decided to save 5190 permanently as the newINPUT_SCALE value for all axes.
To save this parameter value for future machineuse, the related initialization file (*.ini) was edited andsaved through the terminal. The stepper configurationfile is located in the following directory:
‘CNCDesktop:/etc/emc2/sampleconfigs/stepper/stepper_inch.ini’.
4.4. Wax material artifact test
After editing and saving the new scale value, theCNC lathe’s ability to follow a G-code program’s
commands was tested. The lathe produced the pro-gram’s graphical simulation perfectly. It created a partout of wax with high precision and high efficiency.Figure 18 compares the graphical simulation with theactual finished part. The part and the graphical cuttingimage were nearly identical. The program specified thepiece to have a length of 1.570 inches and a basediameter of 2*0.58¼ 1.160 inches. The actual part hasa total length of 1.572 inches and a base diameter of1.161 inches. The machining process took a little over2min to complete. The CNC lathe’s capability toexecute a G-code program was declared a success.
5. Conclusions
The entrepreneurship certificate program establishedin 2007 is expanding and has achieved a number ofmilestones: engineering and business faculty membersare actively engaged in promoting the entrepreneurshipprogram across the Mercer campus. Both graduate andundergraduate students are attracted to the entrepre-neurship-related courses. Students are enrolled incross-disciplinary entrepreneurial senior design proj-ects. They are listening to successful entrepreneursthrough invited speakers and seminars, developingbusiness plans and competing in design and businessplan competitions, and presenting technical papers atnational and international conferences. Plans areunderway for expanding the entrepreneurship programby establishing a ‘Mercer Center for Innovation andEntrepreneurship’ at the Macon campus in the nearfuture.
The CNC tabletop lathe update and retrofittingproject presented in this article was a complete success,as measured by all aspects of the project deliverables.
Figure 15. Breakout board installation, external view. Figure 16. Breakout board installation, internal view.
34 R. Radharamanan and J.-N. Juang
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
An optocoupler-based interconnect board wasdesigned and constructed. This design was put onto abread board for preliminary tests, where it was quicklyproven functional. Combining this interconnectionwith a Linux-based PC running EMC2 yielded amodern, fully operational CNC lathe suitable forlaboratory or research work.
With this design proven to be a success, a wire-wrapped prototype of the interconnection breakoutboard was then built and tested. These tests were aimed
at testing the lathe’s accuracy and efficiency. Theaccuracy and precision results were established and thenecessary modifications were made to the software.Lastly, the final version board was made using layouteditor software and a CNC PCB milling machine.It was then installed into the lathe. For the finalperformance validation test, a complete artifact wasfabricated.
The CNC lathe was retrofitted to operate in afashion similar to its original condition with the
Figure 18. Graphical comparison of simulation with the actual finished part.
Figure 17. Graphical simulation of artifact test.
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 35
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
addition of a modern computer interface and newcontrolling software. The CNC tabletop lathe willfulfill its original purpose in educating students inusing CNC machines. Working with older technologymay be frustrating because of the lack of proprietaryparts and component specifications. The determinationof the student capstone design team was the primaryfactor in the project’s success.
Overall, the CNC lathe project was an excellentmeans for engineering students to apply electrical,mechanical, computer, and industrial engineeringknowledge in a single device. The students gainednew knowledge and teaming skills by successfullydesigning and implementing the new real-time, CNCmachine tool controller with Linux.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to the KernFamily Foundation for the initial grant during 2007–2009 andthe expansion grant during 2009–2011 to promote innovationand entrepreneurship in engineering education at MUSE.
References
Amato, D., et al., 2007. CNC lathe project, critical design
review. Macon, GA: School of Engineering, Mercer
University.Anderson, D.M., 2008. Design for manufacturability and
concurrent engineering. Cambria, CA: CIM Press.Blenker, P., et al., 2008. A framework for developing
entrepreneurship education in a university context.
International journal of entrepreneurship and small business,
5 (1), 45–63.Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., and Knight, W., 2002. Product
design for manufacture and assembly. 2nd ed. New York:
Taylor & Francis Group.Bygrave, W. and Zacharakis, A., 2008.
Entrepreneurship. 1st ed. New Jersey: Wiley.CadSoft., 2007. EAGLE PCB layout editor [online].
Available from: www.cadsoftusa.com/ [Accessed 21
March 2009].Clase, K.L., 2007. Promoting creativity and innovation in an
entrepreneurial certificate program through science and
technology. The technology interface, 8 (1), 1–11.Dorf, R.C. and Byers, T.H., 2008. Technology ventures: from
idea to enterprise. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gaspar, F.C., 2009. The stimulation of entrepreneurship
through venture capital and business incubation.
International journal of entrepreneurship and innovation
management, 9 (4), 396–415.Hisrich, R.D., Peters, M.P., and Shepherd, D.A., 2008.
Entrepreneurship. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Kommareddy, S., 2000. PC-based open architecture servo
controller for CNC machining. In: Proceedings of the
second real time Linux workshop, Orlando, FL. 27–28.Kuratko, D., 1995. Entrepreneurship in international encyclo-
pedia of business and management. London, UK:
International Thomson Press.LinuxCNC.org., 2007. Enhanced machine controller ¼ EMC
[online]. Available from: http:/www.linuxcnc.org/
[Accessed 21 March 2009].LPKF Laser & Electronics., 2006. CircuitCAM 5.1.692
[online]. Available from: www.lpkfusa.com/software/
ccam.htm [Accessed 10 April 2009].
Mercer Universi1ty. 2009. Mercer university catalog.
Academic Year 2008–2009. Macon, GA: Macon Campus.
Messica, A. and Agmon, T., 2009. Venture capital dynamics,
the public sector and the high technology industry.
International journal of entrepreneurship and innovation
management, 10 (3–4), 227–242.Sager, B. and Dowling, M., 2009. Strategic marketing
planning for opportunity exploitation in young entrepre-
neurial companies. International journal of entrepreneurial
venturing, 1 (1), 88–107.Sanz-Velasco, S.A. and Saemundsson, R., 2008.
Entrepreneurial learning in academic spin-offs: a business
model perspective. International journal of entrepreneurship
and innovation management, 8 (1), 15–35.
Shane, S., 2004. Academic entrepreneurship: university
spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward
Elgar.Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., 2000. The promise of
entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of
management review, 25 (1), 217–226.StarTurn Installation., 1990. Programming instruction and
maintenance manual [online]. Available from: www.
mainline-computers.co.uk/ [Accessed 20 April 2009].
Tidd, J. and Bessant, J., 2009. Managing innovation:
integrating technological, market and organizational
change. 4th ed. England, UK: Wiley.Timmons, J.A. and Spinelli, S., 2009. New venture creation:
entrepreneurship for the 21st Century. 8th ed. New York:
McGraw-Hill.Ubuntu., 2007. Ubuntu Linux operating system [online].
Available from: http://www.ubuntu.com/ [Accessed 25
March 2009].
36 R. Radharamanan and J.-N. Juang
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Eas
tern
Mic
higa
n U
nive
rsity
] at
18:
44 0
9 O
ctob
er 2
014
top related