indonesian rail masterplan market assessment the role of rail in the indonesian transport system
Post on 12-Jan-2016
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Indonesian Rail Masterplan Market Assessment
The role of rail in the Indonesian transport system
Outline
• Background/setting• The role of rail in transport system• Overview of performance• Strengths of rail• Impact of sector policies
• Implications for market assessment• Java main line passenger• Jabotabek passenger• Java freight• South Sumatra Coal• New coal lines
Approach to Market Assessment
• Key principles– price: impossible to assess demand without considering price
and competition– cost: impossible to consider price without considering cost– Here: economic cost not financial cost. Because point of view
• Government• economic efficiency
• Questions – Strengths of rail: what is role of rail in transport system– demand for rail in the transport markets considering cost and
price
The role of rail in the transport system
2 approaches to identify role of rail• Performance in market
– By main tasks/lines of business• Based on revenues
– Growth of passenger/km, tonne/km• Comparison of costs for different tasks
– Scenario analysis – Tonne/km cost of rail versus road
Overview of performance
PTKA revenues by main line of business 2008
Line of business % of revenues
Java main line passenger services 45
South Sumatra Coal 27
Jabotabek passenger services 9
Java freight 8
Java local passenger services 4
Other 7
Total 100
Java main line passengerpassenger/km and yield
• Overall decline of 3% p/y since 2000– Traffic declined sharply early 2000s but is recovering since
2004 • Highlights 2000 - 2008
– executive: + 0.7 % and yields and distances are good– business: - 4.4 % and lower yields – economy: -3.8 % low yields are topped up by PSO– local: + 7.2 % low yields are topped up by PSO– Conclusion: loss of market share – except for local
• This requires in-depth analysis – market research– When was high point reached– What was impact of deregulation in competing modes– What was impact of aggressive performance competition– What was impact of economic crisis– Other factors ???
Jabotabek passenger servicespassenger/km and yield
• 1981 – 2008 : – overall steady growth 7.1 % p/y – but 2.8 % since 2000
• Highlights 2000 -2008– economy: slight decline of 0.3 % p/y - very low yield compensated
by PSO– decline compensated by introduction of A/C and commercial– much better yields for commercial and economy A/C– commercial approach by PTKA
• Jabotabek market segment also requires careful analysis– Scope for further service differentiation - higher yields
• Commercial 250 Rp/pass/km compared to 43 Rp/pass/km for economy
– Scope for developing new markets in context of suburban rail transit development integrated with urban development
Java freight services
• Highlights– Java freight = 8 % of PTKA revenues– Peak probably in 1996: 1,440 tonnes/km– Since 1996: traffic - 2.1 % p/y– Traffic composition has changed considerably– Yield per tonne/km: Rp. 254 – Cost per tonne/km: Rp 500 ? Rp 600 ?– Loss per tonne/km: Rp. 250 ? Rp 350 ?
• Question: Which cargo has future– Need for detailed traffic costing– Focus on profitable services– Exit strategies for unprofitable services
South Sumatra coal traffic
• Highlights– 2008: 10.5 million tonnes – 4.4% p/y since 1991– Coal traffic = 27 % of revenues of PTKA– Coal > than 91 % of freight revenues of SS Railway– yield Rp/tonne/km: Suralaya: 250; Kertapati 313– Haul distance (km): 409 162
• Question: why vertical separation
South Sumatra Freight Revenue
Type of Freight Proportion
(%) Suralaya Coal 81.7 Other Coal 9.7 Petroleum Products 5.4 Other 2.2 Cement/Klinker 1.0 Total 100.0
New coal railway lines
• Several studies and proposals for new lines• Sumatra:
– objective: to enable increase in production– part of new logistics chain from mine to a vessel loading point– example: new line to transport Bukit Assam coal to new deep
water port at Tanjung Api Api, also involving construction of a bridge across Musi river: 3 major investments !
• Kalimantan:– part of logistics chain for a new mine (or group of new mines)
to a vessel loading point. – example: proposals for Kalimantan lines.
• Feasibility is dependent on outlook in coal markets and ability to obtain firm purchase agreements
• Challenges impeding realization– all elements of logistics chain need to be developed– approvals of many central and local govt agencies
Strengths of rail compared to road Impact of volume and distance
• Rail - total operating costs – Java freight: Rp/t/km ?? – ESS coal: Rp/t/km ??
• Why is cost Java more than 2 times higher ?
Total volume(Million tonnes 2008)
Hauling distance
(km)
Java (mix of general cargo)
4.3 258
Suralaya coal(block train)
8.5 405
500 Kilometer Haul – Siding to Siding Versus Pickup And Delivery Costs
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1 million tons 3 million tons 5 million tons
Rp
/to
n/k
m
Rail New Inf rastructure - pick up and delivery
Rail New Inf rastructure -siding to siding
Road New Inf rastructure
Road Existing
Rail versus road - impact of volume 500 km haul - Rp/tonne/km
• Scenario analysis – rail versus road– Road is lower cost at low volumes– As volume increases, unit cost of rail declines
• Rail: siding to siding – rail is only lower cost than new road at 5 million tonnes
• Rail: pick up and delivery cost– road remains lower cost even at 5 million tonnes
250 Km Haul - Siding to Siding Versus Pickup And Delivery Costs
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1 million tons 3 million tons 5 million tons
Rp
/to
n/k
m
Rail New Infrastructure -pick up and delivery
Rail New Infrastructure -siding to siding
Road New Infrastructure
Road Existing
Road versus rail - impact of distance 250 km haul - Rp/tonne/km
• Scenario analysis – When pick up and delivery costs
rail can not compete with road at 5 million tonnes
• Java freight – typical conditions– 250 km typical hauling distance – total volume < 5 million tonnes – and mixed cargo !
– large proportion of cargo requires pick up and delivery• Outlook for rail ? ?
– need to be very selective
Theory and realitywhy is rail carrying traffic that would be lower cost by road ?
Combination of factors• No charging for infrastructure
– rail and road are competing on basis of their operating costs – higher rail infrastructure cost are not recovered
• No detailed traffic costing– rail may not be fully aware of the real costs of some traffics -
multi-product enterprise – depreciation on basis of historical cost– Govt. contributions in kind in the past
• business as usual – legacy of past • is not sustainable. • “above rail” costs are probably not recovered
How to ensure that rail plays its roleperforms the tasks for which it is best suited
• Context - market economy• Private sector firms in other modes constantly innovate and
reduce costs • passengers and cargo owners make choices
• Easiest if prices/tariffs reflect economic costs• Including external costs
• Ultimately largely an issue of sector policies • Infrastructure investment• Infrastructure pricing – level playing field• Price/tariff regulations• Entry and exit regulations - all modes
• Policies affect modal shares
Information about shipment
Ship Carrier: UPS
Tracking Number: 1ZY3759X0359299933
Status: Delivered
Location: Porch
Order #:
104-7638357-7363431
Shipment Date: December 5, 2009
Destination: BETHESDA, MD, US
Track your package
Date Time Location Event Details
December 8, 2009
05:12:00 PM Burtonsville - Montg MD US
Delivered
December 8, 2009
01:56:00 AM Burtonsville MD US Arrival Scan
December 8, 2009
01:46:00 AM Laurel MD US Out for delivery
December 8, 2009
01:46:00 AM Burtonsville MD US Arrival Scan
December 7, 2009
09:32:00 PM Laurel MD US Arrival Scan
December 7, 2009
07:42:00 PM Harrisburg PA US Departure Scan
December 6, 2009
01:42:00 PM Harrisburg PA US Shipment received by carrier
December 5, 2009
01:12:27 PM Lewisberry PA US Shipment has left seller facility and is in transit
Java commercial passenger services
• Approach to forecasting demand - micro– market by market – service by service – OD– what is competition doing– relative prices – quality of service – elasticity measures– understanding shifts in demand
• Implications– Lead role – PTKA/train operator– Need for accurate cost data for business unit/service– Need for coordination between infrastructure and
operations – Focus on capacity requirements at the level of facility
and corridor
PARIS – LYON 2 DAYS BEFORE DEPARTURE - FIRST CLASS
Leaving on Tuesday 15/12 between 08h54 and 11h54 - total price for 1 passenger Leaving at 08h54 09h54 09h54 10h53 10h53 11h54 11h54
Best price 112.70 € 112.70 € 112.70 € 112.70 € 112.70 € 112.70 € 39.90 €
J ourney time 01h57 02h03 02h15 01h58 02h10 01h57 01h57
Travel with
11h54 - PARIS GARE DE LYON
13h51 - 13h51> via LYON PART DIEU
02937 1st class Reservation required
J ourney time 01h57
39.90 € 1st class : Exchanged, subject to conditions, with a charge of 10€. Non-refundable. Pay on line. Print your own ticket. Exclusive Internet price.
Cancel
11h54 - PARIS GARE DE LYON
13h51 - 13h51> via LYON PART DIEU
06613 1st class Off peak - Reservation required
J ourney time 01h57
112.70 € TGV Loisir : Ticket can be exchanged and refunded (administrative charge applies) before departure and cannot be exchanged or refunded after departure.
119.00 € TGV PRO 1ère : Exchange and refund service free of charge up until departure, and subject to conditions after departure. Warning, starting on 2 February 2010, these conditions are changing. Contact your nearest sales outlet for further information.See conditions.
Cancel
PARIS – LYON 2 MONTHS BEFORE DEPARTURE – FIRST CLASS – MID-DAY DEPARTURE
Leaving on Monday 15/02 between 11h54 and 14h52 - total price for 1 passenger Leaving at 11h54 11h54 11h54 12h54 13h54 13h54 14h52
Best price 34.00 € 29.00 € 29.00 € 34.00 € 34.00 € 34.00 € 34.00 €
J ourney time 01h57 01h57 02h09 01h57 02h03 02h15 01h59
Travel with
11h54 - PARIS GARE DE LYON
13h51 - 13h51> via LYON PART DIEU
02937 1st class Reservation required
29.00 € 1st class : Exchanged, subject to conditions, with a charge of 10€. Non-refundable. Pay on line. Print your own ticket. Exclusive Internet price.
Hurry, last seats available!
11h54 - PARIS GARE DE LYON
13h51 - 13h51> via LYON PART DIEU
06613 1st class Off peak - Reservation required
J ourney time 01h57
34.00 € TGV Prem's : Ticket may not be changed nor refunded.
Hurry, last seats available!
58.00 € TGV Loisir : Ticket can be exchanged and refunded (administrative charge applies) before departure and cannot be exchanged or refunded after departure.
119.00 € TGV PRO 1ère : Exchange and refund service free of charge up until departure, and subject to conditions after departure. Warning, starting on 2 February 2010, these conditions are changing. Contact your nearest sales outlet for further information.See conditions.
Java economy passenger services
• Approach to forecasting demand - micro– BUT– Demand depends on fare – Fare depends on cost and PSO subsidy
• Implications– Need for stable agreement between government and
PTKA/train operator on level of subsidy (PSO)– Need for traffic costing data by business unit/service– Government/MOT to develop concept of: (i) target
population; (ii) level of support justified; (iii) mechanism for PSO delivery
– Need for coordination between infrastructure and operations
– Focus on capacity at level of facility & corridor
Java freight services
• Approach to forecasting demand - micro– market by market, service by service, OD– knowledge of: competition, door-to-door costs, quality of
service, initiatives by competition– changing industrial location
• Implications– Lead role – PTKA/train operator– Need for accurate cost data by business unit/service to
support decision to produce & pricing strategy– Need for coordination between infrastructure and train
operations – Focus on capacity requirements at the level of facility
and corridor – eliminate bottlenecks
Jabotabek passenger servicessuburban commuter rail
• Requirements for efficient metropolitan transport
• integrated multimodal system
• based on complementarity between modes
• need for metropolitan entity
(1) prepare a coordinated metropolitan transport plan; (2) deliver integrated system; (3) providing integrated services
• Role of Jabotabek rail in metropolitan transport
providing high volume suburban commuter transport
• Issues
• Commuter rail is very costly – how to optimize its role
• experience shows that fare box can not cover operating costs
Financing has to be supplemented with other metropolitan income ideally from those who benefit from the economies of agglomeration
Jabotabek passenger services
• Approach to forecasting demand• Identify role of suburban rail in overall transportation system
• based on relative costs of modes
• Macro modeling approach • based on O-D and modal split is preferred
• Planning work has already been done• The Study on Integrated Transportation Masterplan for Jabodetabek• detailed recommendations on investments & actions
• Implications – need for separate business unit for Jabotabek train operations –
operational and financial autonomy– client of business unit = metropolitan transport entity– strong focus on traffic costing to underpin level of subsidy– stable pool of funds from various sources/modes
Integrated land use and transport planning
Goal
to enhance the role of rail in metropolitan transportation
How – Transit oriented urban/suburban development– Central concept: ACCESSIBILITY – Promotion of public transport
In practice (Jabotabek Masterplan Study)– Improve quality of rail services– Upgrade railway stations & intermodal connections– High density real estate development in vicinity of railway
stations
Concept for railway catchment area
South Sumatra coal
Approach to forecasting – institutional status quo• Long term - only one major client
• ideally: long term contract• BUT: credibility of off-take commitments by mining company
• Medium term – coordination/synchronization• Production planning of the mine• Transport capacity planning of railway• Agreement between 3 parties on
• Volumes• Operating procedures at transhipment points• Operating indicators• Cost sharing on rolling stock
Kalimantan new (coal) railway lines (1)
• Obstacles to implementation in past– short distances– collaboration between mining companies for minimum
volumes – coordinated development of ENTIRE logistics chain:
challenge– lack of legal and regulatory framework for private sector
financing• Principles
– integral part of mining scheme (mining permit includes transport)
– mining company fully responsible for• identifying least cost logistics chain• developing, financing and operating all elements of the
logistics chain– Government = facilitator
New (coal) railway lines (2)
• Outlook has now improved– Minimum volumes (5-10 million tonnes)
• available in principle in Kalimantan• In Sumatra if major increase in output at existing location
– Legal framework available
• Remaining issues/challenges– Implementing regulations to be developed– Collaboration for minimum off-take commitments– Government facilitation and coordination during
development stage• One stop shop
top related