implementation strategy for the minimum …...3. target audience these standards are intended for...
Post on 11-Aug-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 1
objective 1:Humanitarian actors are aware of, and refer to, the Minimum Standards
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 2
3. Target Audience These standards are intended for use by those working on child protection or related areas of humanitarian action. This includes 1) those working directly with children, families and communities 2) planners and policy makers at Agency and Government level 3) coordinators 4) donors 5) academics and 6) those working on advocacy, media or communications.
4. Main Activities under each ObjectiveEach of the three Objectives is broken down into suggested Activities, as is listed below. Collectively, the Activities under the Objectives contribute towards achieving the goal.
1.1. Finalise the Minimum Standards and produce copies for dissemination1.1.1. Translate the Minimum Standards into French, Spanish and Arabic and other languages on demand1.1.2. Print the Minimum Standards and develop USB keys that contain the Minimum Standards
1.2. Disseminate English, French and Arabic versions of Minimum Standards1.2.1. Identify low-cost options for storage and mailing the Minimum Standards 1.2.2. Disseminate the Minimum Standards to practitioners from child protection and other sectors1.2.3. Develop a webpage on the Minimum Standards linked to the CPWG website
1.3. Develop «launch pack» for the launch events for the Minimum Standards1.3.1. Develop recommended ‘guidelines’ for launch events 1.3.2. Develop a press kit on the Minimum Standards
1.4. Launch, in collaboration with Governments, the Minimum Standards at 6 global and regional events������� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�ºNSVIHS�SL]LS»�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�.LUL]H������� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�)HUNRVR��;OHPSHUK������� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�+HRHY��:LULNHS������� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�5HPYVIP��2LU`H������� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�(TTHU��1VYKHU������� /VSK�VMÄJPHS�SH\UJO�MVY�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�PU�7HUHTH1.4.7. Update list of scheduled launch events (including national ones) and post on Standards webpage
1.5. Launch, in collaboration with Governments, the Minimum Standards at 15 national level events1.5.1. Liaise with the 25 countries that have CP sub-Clusters that would be able to support a national launch1.5.2. Support countries who volunteer to hold a national event with planning the event
1.6. Develop additional promotional material for the Minimum Standards for a variety of audiences1.6.1. Produce a 1-page brochure on the Minimum Standards in French, Arabic and Spanish1.6.2. Develop a 3-5 minute video about the Minimum Standards and CPIE
1.7. Promote commitment to application of the Minimum Standards1.7.1. Include compliance with Minimum Standards in letters of commitment from CPWG agencies1.7.2. Ensure that the Minimum Standards are circulated widely amongst IASC, CERF and CAP Secretariats1.7.3. Ensure that the Minimum Standards are referred to in new IASC agreed tools and processes
objective 2:The Minimum Standards are an integral part of humanitarian programming and the quality of child protection programming has improved to meet the Minimum Standards
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 3
1.8. Target key CP events and persons in CP agencies to raise awareness about the Minimum Standards1.8.1. Develop a calendar of key CP events scheduled over the course of the next 12-24 months that could be targeted to raise awareness about the Minimum Standards 1.8.2. Compile a list of ‘Point Persons’ within CPWG member agencies who can take forward awareness raising on, and dissemination of the Minimum Standards within their agencies
1.9. Target key non-CP events and humanitarian actors to raise awareness about the Minimum Standards1.9.1. Develop a calendar of key events related to humanitarian response scheduled over the course of the next 12-24 months that could be targeted to raise awareness (e.g. ECHO annual partners meeting, annual meetings of at least 3 other clusters, etc.)�� ���� 3PHPZL�^P[O�6*/(�HUK�[OL�,TLYNLUJ`�9LZPKLU[�*VVYKPUH[VY»Z�6MÄJL�[V�KL[LYTPUL�^H`Z�[V�YHPZL� awareness amongst the Humanitarian Coordinators and Humanitarian Country Teams1.9.3. Brief global level Cluster Coordinators on the Minimum Standards
1.10. Track the use and reception of the Minimum Standards1.10.1. Monitor and document spin-offs, training packages, etc.1.10.2. Monitor/coordinate, document and support further translations1.10.3. Develop and maintain feedback mechanism to identify gaps, further requirements et, for future revisions and other improvements
2.1. Provide technical assistance for humanitarian agencies implementing the Minimum Standards2.1.1. Make available one full time deployable child protection expert who can provide technical assistance �������� +LWSV`�[OL�L_WLY[�H[�H�YH[L�VM�����[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK�JOPSK�WYV[LJ[PVU�YLZWVUZLZ��WYPVYP[PZPUN�PU[LYHNLUJ`� requests over single agency requests) to advise and support on implementation of the MS2.1.3. Develop a knowledge bank of tools to support implementation of the Minimum Standards
2.2. Develop training and orientation materials on the Minimum Standards for practitioners2.2.1. Review existing CPIE training materials and ensure that Minimum Standards are adequately referenced 2.2.2. Develop training materials for the Standards which are not yet covered in the package2.2.3. Develop an online training course on the Minimum Standards for Child Protection actors������� +L]LSVW�H�WHWLY�VU�OV^�[V�\ZL�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ�H[�ÄLSK�SL]LS��JVU[L_[\HSPZH[PVU�HUK�TVUP[VYPUN�2.2.5. Develop webinars for the Minimum Standards, each webinar covering a different standard
2.3. Develop a tool to evaluate compliance of programming with the Minimum Standards2.3.1. Develop a tool to monitor and evaluate compliance of project proposals with the Minimum Standards2.3.2. Promote the compliance tool amongst CP sub-Clusters in emergency contexts for use2.3.3. CP sub-Clusters use compliance tool to rate overall project proposals (similar to Gender Marker)
2.4. Develop, in collaboration with the Protection Cluster, tools to promote the Minimum Standards for practitioners from other sectors2.4.1. Develop 2 page documents on Standard relevant for other sectors – linking with Sphere standards2.4.2. Develop orientation sessions (online or in person) on the Minimum Standards for other sectors 2.4.3. Identify ways, with Cluster Coordinators, to promote these tools in the different sectors and contexts
2.5. Identify donors and/or governments who could champion application of the Minimum Standards2.5.1. Identify 3-5 government partners who could champion the implementation of the Minimum Standards2.5.2. Develop talking points for sessions with donors and government representatives2.5.3. Carry out orientation sessions with the interested donors and government representatives to discuss with them what would be possible in terms of incorporating the Standards into their plans or strategies2.5.4. Explore possibilities for short term secondments to support the implementation strategy
objective 3:The Minimum Standards are used, and referred to in programme support processes,such as human resource management and fundraising
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 4
2.6. Support adaptation and interpretation of the Minimum Standards 2.6.1. Develop a child-friendly version of the standards2.6.2. Develop a process, with required tools, to orientate community members on the Minimum Standards������� +L]LSVW�H�WYVJLZZ��^P[O�YLX\PYLK�[VVSZ��[V�VYPLU[H[L�ZWLJPÄJ�[HYNL[�NYV\WZ��L�N��YLSPNPV\Z�SLHKLYZ��VU� the Minimum Standards
����� 6WUHQJWKHQ�SUDFWLFH�LQ�UHODWLRQ�WR�VSHFLðF�ìSULQFLSOHVú�DQG�ìVWDQGDUGVú�� (The responsibility for attainment of these objectives is taken on by named lead agencies in the CPWG work plan and will be monitored by the CPWG)2.7.1. Strengthen child protection systems: Collect, and make available, learning on strengthening child protection systems in emergencies2.7.2. Unaccompanied and separated children: Develop and ensure coherent global guidance by the � *7>.�<(:*�;HZR�-VYJL�VU�<(:*�WYVNYHTTPUN��[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK�JVVYKPUH[PVU�TLJOHUPZTZ��IHZLK on the Minimum Standards 2.7.3. Sexual violence: Make available interagency guidance on programming on sexual violence against � JOPSKYLU�[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK�JVVYKPUH[PVU�TLJOHUPZTZ��IHZLK�VU�[OL�4PUPT\T�:[HUKHYKZ��PU�JVVWLYH[PVU� with the GBV AoR 2.7.4. Child labour:�4HRL�H]HPSHISL�PU[LYHNLUJ`�N\PKHUJL�VU�WYVNYHTTPUN�VU�JOPSK�SHIV\Y�[V�ÄLSK�IHZLK� coordination mechanisms, based on the Minimum Standards 2.7.5. Child-friendly spaces:�+L]LSVW��[LZ[�HUK�ÄUHSPZL�HJJVTWHU`PUN�[YHPUPUN�WHJRHNL�[V�Z\WWVY[�H[[HPUTLU[� of the Minimum Standards in CFS programmes2.7.6. Case management: collect and analyse examples of existing case management systems in emergencies in order to assess current gaps and challenges in meeting the Minimum Standards 2.7.7. Disaster Risk Reduction: Develop and test a conceptual framework on child protection and DRR and ensure that this is considered in subsequent versions of the Minimum Standards
3.1. Monitor and evaluate compliance of agency’s policies and procedures with the Minimum Standards3.1.1. Develop an institutionalisation checklist for agencies to self-assess the integration of the Minimum Standards within their agencies3.1.2. Promote use of the institutionalisation checklist amongst all CPWG agencies ������� :\WWVY[�HNLUJPLZ�[V�KL]LSVW�WSHUZ�[V�HKKYLZZ�NHWZ�PKLU[PÄLK3.1.4. Follow-up with agencies at agreed times once a year to monitor progress against set objectives
3.2. Develop guidance and materials to support the institutionalisation of the Minimum Standards3.2.1. Develop orientation on the Minimum Standards for induction of new staff3.2.2. Develop guidance on how to include the Minimum Standards in job descriptions and interviews3.2.3. Develop guidance on how to include the Minimum Standards into their agency websites, laptops, etc.3.2.4. Develop guidance on how to include the Minimum Standards in performance management of staff3.2.5. Develop criteria for agency internal review of project funding proposals
3.3. Develop guidance to support agencies in their monitoring and evaluation work3.3.1. Liaise with the Child Protection Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group (CP MERG) ������� 3PHPZL�^P[O�(35(7��6,*+�HUK�V[OLY�IVKPLZ�[OH[�WYVK\JL�N\PKHUJL�MVY�JHYY`PUN�V\[�L]HS\H[PVUZ�3.3.3. Develop guidance for how agencies can include the Minimum Standards in evaluations
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 5
Increase inawareness of, and knowledge about,the Minimum Standards
# of interagency strategies in emergency contexts that refer to the Minimum Standards
# of regional/country-based/local launches
# of people who have attended an awareness raising session e.g. a launch L]LU[�VY�H�IYPLÄUN
:\Y]L`�VM�*7�ÄLSKlevel coordination mechanisms
Launch trackrecords
Twice per year
Increase in the access to the Minimum Standards
# of downloads of the Minimum Standards via the webpage, per country and type of organisation
# of print and USB versions of Minimum Standards disseminated
Analysis of webpage visits
Distribution track record
Once per year
Ensure compliance with the Minimum Standards by CPWG members
# of Letters of commitment by CPWG agencies
Once per year
OUTCOMES OUTCOMESINDICATORS
METhODOF DATA
COLLECTION
FREqUENCyOF DATA
COLLECTION
ObjECTIvE 1
Humanitarianactors are
aware of, andrefer to,
the Minimum Standards
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 6
Improved capacity of CP practitioners to deliver CP responses in line with best practice
��VM�ÄLSK�SL]LS�CP coordination mechanisms whose gap and services analysis is based on the Minimum Standards
# of CPWG member agencies who incorporate the Minimum Standards into their humanitarian capacity building programs
# of Government partners promoting the use of the Minimum Standards
:\Y]L`�VM�*7�ÄLSK�level coordination mechanisms
Survey of agencies
Once per year
Once per year
Once per year
CP is mainstreamed into other sectors
�VM�ZLJ[VY�ZWLJPÄJ�tools for CP mainstreaming
# of orientation sessions held on global/regional/country level on CP mainstreaming (based on Minimum Standards)
Track record
Increased resources for CP responses that are in line with Minimum Standards
# of donors who reference the Minimum Standards in their funding requirements
Survey of donors Once per year
Improved quality in programming (in key areas) based on the Minimum Standards
�ÄLSK�IHZLK�CP coordination mechanisms reporting improvements of quality in programming PU�PKLU[PÄLK�HYLHZ
�VM�HNLUJPLZ�HUK�ÄLSK�based coordination mechanisms reporting against minimum 5 standard indicators (any)
:\Y]L`�VM�*7�ÄLSK�level coordination mechanisms
Outcome of monitoring information through the accountability tool
Once per year
OUTCOMES OUTCOMESINDICATORS
METhODOF DATA
COLLECTION
FREqUENCyOF DATA
COLLECTION
ObjECTIvE 2
The quality of child protection programming
has improved to meet the Minimum
Standards
Increased capacity of agencies to monitor performance of staff in line with Minimum Standards
% (or #?) of agencies that report that they have incorporated the Minimum Standards in their performance management of relevant staff
Survey of agencies Once per year
Increased capacity of CP agencies to provide predictableCP responses
% of agencies that report that they have incorporated Minimum Standards into evaluation processes
Survey of agencies Once per year
ObjECTIvE 3
The Minimum Standards are
used, and referredto in programme
support processes, such as human
resource management
and fundraising
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 7
IMPACT IMPACTINDICATORS
METhODOF DATA
COLLECTION
FREqUENCyOF DATA
COLLECTION
Improvedquality,
predictability and
accountabilityof child
protection responses in emergencies
���0U[LY]LU[PVUZ�[V�TP[PNH[L�[OL�[VW�Ä]L�dangers to girls and boys of different age are in place in all affected communities
2. Percentage of communities where child-friendly responses have been put in place for survivors of physical violence and harmful practices
3. Percentage of reported cases of children who experience sexual violence who receive an age- and gender- appropriate response
4. Percentage of targeted children involved in CP programmes reported to be showing a decrease in symptoms associated with mental disorders and psychosocial distress compared to the baseline
5. Percentage of girls and boys separated from armed forces or groups who are effectively reintegrated in their families and the community or alternatively integrated
6. Number of children involved in the Worst Forms of Child Labour who receive adequate support
7. Percentage of children registered for tracing that have been YL\UPÄLK and stayed with their family for more than six months
8. Percentage of children who are in contact with the police who are dealt with using child-friendly procedures
Survey of CP ðHOG�OHYHO�
coordination mechanisms
Once per year
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 8
AC
TIv
ITy
TO
TAL
CO
ST
(US
D)
CO
MM
ITT
ED
OR
IDE
NT
IFIE
D F
UN
DIN
GF
UN
DIN
GS
TIL
L N
EE
DE
DN
OT
ES
1.1.
Fin
alis
e th
e M
inim
um S
tand
ard
s an
d p
rod
uce
cop
ies
for
dis
sem
inat
ion
56’0
0040
’000
16’0
00
1.2.
Dis
sem
inat
e E
nglis
h, F
renc
h an
d A
rabi
c ve
rsio
ns o
f Min
imum
Sta
ndar
ds20
’000
-20
’000
1.3.
Dev
elop
«la
unch
pac
k» fo
r th
e la
unch
eve
nts
for
the
Min
imum
Sta
ndar
ds2’
000
-2’
000
1.4.
Lau
nch
the
Min
imum
Sta
ndar
ds a
t 6 g
loba
l and
regi
onal
leve
l eve
nts
20’0
00-
20’0
004’
000
x 5
even
ts
1.5.
Lau
nch
the
Min
imum
Sta
ndar
ds a
t 15
natio
nal l
evel
eve
nts
--
-
1.6.
Dev
elop
add
ition
al p
rom
otio
nal m
ater
ial f
or t
he M
inim
um S
tand
ards
for
a va
riety
of a
udie
nce
8’00
05’
000
3’00
07’
000
vid
eo
1’00
0 b
roch
ure
1.7.
Pro
mot
e co
mm
itmen
t to
appl
icat
ion
of th
e M
inim
um S
tand
ard
s-
--
1.8.
Tar
get
key
CP
eve
nts
and
pers
ons
in C
P a
genc
ies
to r
aise
aw
aren
ess
abou
t the
Min
imum
Sta
ndar
ds-
--
1.9.
Tar
get
key
non-
CP
eve
nts
and
hum
anita
rian
acto
rs t
o ra
ise
awar
enes
s ab
out t
he M
inim
um S
tand
ards
--
-
1.10
. Tra
ck th
e us
e an
d re
cept
ion
of th
e M
inim
um S
tand
ard
s10
’000
-10
’000
Oth
er t
rans
latio
ns
Sub
tota
l OB
JEC
TIV
E 1
116’
000
45’0
0071
’000
OB
JEC
TIV
E 1
: H
UM
AN
ITA
RIA
N A
CT
OR
S A
RE
AW
AR
E O
F, A
ND
RE
FER
TO
, TH
E M
INIM
UM
STA
ND
AR
DS
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 9
AC
TIv
ITy
TO
TAL
CO
ST
(US
D)
CO
MM
ITT
ED
OR
IDE
NT
IFIE
D F
UN
DIN
GF
UN
DIN
GS
TIL
L N
EE
DE
DN
OT
ES
2.1.
Pro
vid
e te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce f
or h
uman
itaria
n ag
enci
es i
mp
lem
entin
g th
e M
inim
um S
tand
ard
s10
0’00
0-
100’
000
1 x
fullt
ime
tech
nica
l exp
ert
2.2.
Dev
elop
tra
inin
g an
d or
ient
atio
n m
ater
ials
on
the
Min
imum
Sta
ndar
ds fo
r pr
actit
ione
rs15
’000
15’0
00-
Con
sulta
ncy
+ IT
co
sts
2.3.
Dev
elop
a to
ol to
eva
luat
e co
mpl
ianc
e of
pro
gram
min
g w
ith th
e M
inim
um
Sta
ndar
ds10
’000
10’0
00-
Con
sulta
ncy
2.4.
Dev
elop
, in
colla
bora
tion
with
the
Pro
tect
ion
Clu
ster
, too
ls to
pro
mot
e th
e M
inim
um S
tand
ards
for
prac
titio
ners
from
oth
er s
ecto
rs-
--
2.5.
Ide
ntify
don
ors
and/
or g
over
nmen
ts w
ho c
ould
cha
mpi
on a
pplic
atio
n of
th
e M
inim
um S
tand
ards
10’0
0010
’000
-Tr
avel
2.6.
Sup
port
ada
ptat
ion
and
inte
rpre
tatio
n of
the
Min
imum
Sta
ndar
ds11
’500
11’5
00-
5’00
0 C
hild
frie
ndly
ver
sion
6’50
0 C
omm
unity
sup
por
t
�����:[YLUN[OLU�WYHJ[PJL�PU�YLSH[PVU�[V�ZWLJPÄJ�WYPUJPWSLZ�HUK
�Z[HUK
HYKZ�PU�[OL�
MS
doc
umen
t 21
0’00
0-
210’
000
30’0
00 fo
r ea
ch o
f the
7
elem
ents
men
tione
d a
bov
e
Sub
tota
l OB
JEC
TIV
E 2
356’
500
46’5
0031
0’00
0
OB
JEC
TIV
E 2
: T
HE
MIN
IMU
M S
TAN
DA
RD
S A
RE
AR
E IN
TE
GR
AL
PAR
T O
F H
UM
AN
ITA
RIA
N P
RO
GR
AM
MIN
GA
ND
TH
E Q
UA
LIT
Y O
F C
HIL
D P
RO
TE
CT
ION
PR
OG
RA
MM
ING
HA
S IM
PR
OV
ED
TO
ME
ET
TH
E M
INIM
UM
STA
ND
AR
DS
AC
TIv
ITy
TO
TAL
CO
ST
(US
D)
CO
MM
ITT
ED
OR
IDE
NT
IFIE
D F
UN
DIN
GF
UN
DIN
GS
TIL
L N
EE
DE
DN
OT
ES
3.1.
Mon
itor
and
eva
luat
e co
mp
lianc
e of
age
ncy’
s p
olic
ies
and
pro
ced
ures
w
ith t
he M
inim
um S
tand
ard
s-
--
3.2.
Dev
elop
gui
danc
e an
d m
ater
ials
to
supp
ort
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
M
inim
um S
tand
ards
40’0
00-
40’0
00C
onsu
ltanc
y
3.3.
Dev
elop
gui
dan
ce t
o su
ppor
t ag
enci
es in
the
ir m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n w
ork
10’0
00-
10’0
00P
oint
3.3
.3.
Sub
tota
l OB
JEC
TIV
E 3
50’0
00-
50’0
00
OB
JEC
TIV
E 3
: TH
E M
INIM
UM
STA
ND
AR
DS
AR
E U
SE
D, A
ND
RE
FER
RE
D T
O IN
PR
OG
RA
MM
E S
UP
PO
RT
PR
OC
ES
SE
S,
SU
CH
AS
HU
MA
N R
ES
OU
RC
E M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T A
ND
FU
ND
RA
ISIN
G
Implementation Strategy for the Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action 10
GLO
bA
L C
OS
TS
Sal
arie
s p
roje
ct m
anag
emen
t20
0’00
065
’000
135’
002
x 50
%
Sub
tota
l GLO
BA
L C
OS
TS
200’
000
65’0
0013
5’00
TO
TAL
722’
500
156’
500
566’
000
AC
TIv
ITy
TO
TAL
CO
ST
(US
D)
CO
MM
ITT
ED
OR
IDE
NT
IFIE
D F
UN
DIN
GF
UN
DIN
GS
TIL
L N
EE
DE
DN
OT
ES
top related