ground motion from m 6.6 norcia, italy earthquake

Post on 22-Jan-2018

54 Views

Category:

Engineering

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Ground Motions in Norcia, ItalyM 6.6 Earthquake on October 30, 2016M 6.2 Earthquake on August 24, 2016

Praveen K. MalhotraOctober 31, 2016

2 of 20

Accelerations in Norcia M 6.6 @ 5.4 km October 30, 2016

3 of 20

Accelerations in Norcia M 6.2 @ 14 km August 24, 2016

4 of 20

Resultant Horizontal Accelerations in Norcia M 6.6 @ 5.4 km October 30, 2016

PGA = 0.526 g

5 of 20

Resultant Horizontal Accelerations in Norcia M 6.2 @ 14 km August 24, 2016

PGA = 0.452 g

6 of 20

Velocities in Norcia M 6.6 @ 5.4 km October 30, 2016

7 of 20

Velocities in Norcia M 6.2 @ 14 km August 24, 2016

8 of 20

Resultant Horizontal Velocities in NorciaM 6.6 @ 5.4 km October 30, 2016

PGV = 53 cm/s

9 of 20

Resultant Horizontal Velocities in NorciaM 6.2 @ 14 km August 24, 2016

PGV = 30.2 cm/s

10 of 20

Displacements in Norcia M 6.6 @ 5.4 kmOctober 30, 2016

11 of 20

Displacements in Norcia M 6.2 @ 14 kmAugust 24, 2016

12 of 20

Resultant Horizontal Displacements in Norcia M 6.6 @ 5.4 km October 30, 2016

PGD = 24.9 cm

13 of 20

Resultant Horizontal Displacements in Norcia M 6.2 @ 14 km August 24, 2016

PGD = 8.19 cm

14 of 20

Tripartite Response Spectrum of Horizontal Ground Motion in Norcia M 6.6 @ 5.4 km October 30, 2016

15 of 20

Tripartite Response Spectrum of Horizontal Ground Motion in Norcia M 6.2 @ 14 km August 24, 2016

16 of 20

Acceleration-Deformation Response Spectrum of Horizontal Ground Motion in Norcia M 6.6 @ 5.4 km October 30, 2016

17 of 20

Acceleration-Deformation Response Spectrum of Horizontal Ground Motion in Norcia M 6.2 @ 14 km August 24, 2016

18 of 20

Deformation Demands on Structures of Various Lateral Strengths in Norcia

Lateral Strength

(% of Weight)

Deformation Demands

M 6.2 August 24 M 6.6 October 30

50% 1.9 cm 27 cm

30% 6.8 cm 24 cm

25% 6.7 cm 21 cm

20% 17 cm 26 cm

10% 17 cm 26 cm

19 of 20

Comments on Norcia Ground Motions• Deformation demands from the October 30th

earthquake are significantly higher than those from the August 24th earthquake

• It does not matter whether the October 30th

earthquake is called the mainshock or aftershock• What matters is that a structure experiences all

events (foreshocks, mainshock and aftershocks)• Dependent events (foreshocks and aftershocks)

are usually ignored in seismic hazard analysis• In seismic design, amplitudes and load cycles from

all dependent events should be considered

20 of 20

Acknowledgment• Data may be obtained from Italian National

Strong Motion Network (RAN) managed by the Department of Civil Protection (DPC): http://ran.protezionecivile.it/IT/index.php

• Data processing is preliminary• No warranty of any kind is assumed

top related