goal v: suspension report - guilford county schools€¦ · goal v: suspension report division of...

Post on 14-Jun-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

S H A R O N L . C O N T R E R A S , P H . D . | S U P E R I N T E N D E N T

Goal V: Suspension Report

DIV IS ION OF ACCOUNTABIL ITY AND RESEARCH

GUILFORD COUNT Y SCHOOLS

DECEMBER 17 , 2019

MissionGuilford County students will graduate as responsible

citizens prepared to succeed in higher education,

or in the career of their choice.*

*This mission was adopted by the Guilford County Board of Education on December 12, 2000.

VisionTransforming learning and life outcomes for all students.

2

GCS Board Goals & KPIs

3

Goal V: Decrease Gaps

By 2022, decrease the achievement gap between black and Latino students and their white peers by 7 percentage points (currently gap ranges from 25-37 percent in reading and math).

KPI V.3. Percentage of students out-of-school suspended overall and by racial/ethnic groups.

4

Who is Being Suspended?

5

# of Suspensions Over Time

# o

f Su

spen

sio

ns

12,117 11,969

10,944 10,886

10,0029,180

6,587

7,7766,916 6,932 6,756

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

*N/A

*In the 2013-14 school year, the state mandated the use of PowerSchool as a statewide discipline data reporting system.Due to complications with the system, data from this school-year was not verified and cannot be used in our historical documentation of discipline suspensions throughout the district.

Change in Superintendent

6

# of Suspensions Among Groups Over Time

6

Year AllWhite Black Hispanic All Others

Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female

2007-08 12,117 1,595 466 6,003 2,655 414 156 552 276

2008-09 11,969 1,545 403 6,006 2,630 417 137 599 232

2009-10 10,944 1,563 361 5,336 2,364 427 142 537 214

2010-11 10,886 1,531 361 5,421 2,247 437 175 501 213

2011-12 10,002 1,378 305 5,003 2,128 481 122 434 151

2012-13 9,180 1,097 283 4,664 2,007 452 149 375 153

2013-14*

2014-15 6,587 746 191 3,288 1,454 416 130 283 79

2015-16 7,776 739 195 3,994 1,698 516 184 324 126

2016-17 6,916 764 198 3,333 1,592 443 148 317 121

2017-18 6,932 634 147 3,545 1,555 436 168 289 158

2018-19 6,756 616 170 3,288 1,582 457 183 331 129

*In the 2013-14 school year, the state mandated the use of PowerSchool as a statewide discipline data reporting system.Due to complications with the system, data from this school-year was not verified and cannot be used in our historical documentation of discipline suspensions throughout the district.

7

# of Students Suspended By Group

7

District White Black Hispanic All Others SWD EL

2014-15 4,034 628 2,786 369 251 1,040 181

2015-16 4,513 633 3,147 444 289 1,225 139

2016-17 4,246 673 2,883 402 288 1,081 147

2017-18 4,142 530 2,912 409 291 1,057 168

2018-19 4,084 545 2,820 428 291 1,003 195

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

8

% of Students Suspended by Group

8

District White Black Hispanic All Others SWD EL

2014-15 5.5% 2.4% 9.2% 3.7% 3.3% 10.1% 3.4%

2015-16 6.1% 2.5% 10.4% 4.2% 3.7% 12.2% 2.9%

2016-17 5.8% 2.8% 9.7% 3.6% 3.6% 11.1% 3.1%

2017-18 5.7% 2.2% 9.7% 3.5% 3.5% 10.9% 3.0%

2018-19 5.6% 2.4% 9.4% 3.6% 3.4% 10.3% 3.1%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

9

% of Students SuspendedBy Race/Ethnicity and Gender

9

Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female

2014-15 1.9% 0.6% 6.0% 3.2% 2.7% 0.9% 2.5% 0.8%

2015-16 2.0% 0.6% 6.9% 3.5% 3.0% 1.2% 2.5% 1.3%

2016-17 2.1% 0.6% 6.3% 3.4% 2.6% 1.0% 2.5% 1.1%

2017-18 1.8% 0.5% 6.3% 3.4% 2.6% 0.9% 2.3% 1.2%

2018-19 1.9% 0.5% 6.1% 3.3% 2.5% 1.0% 2.4% 1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

White Black Hispanic All Others

10

Racial/Ethnic Breakdown of Students Who Were Suspended

10

2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

White 15.6% 14.0% 15.9% 12.8% 13.3%

Black 69.1% 69.7% 67.9% 70.3% 69.0%

Hispanic 9.1% 9.8% 9.5% 9.9% 10.5%

All Others 6.2% 6.4% 6.8% 7.0% 7.1%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

11

Student Enrollment vs. Suspension by Race2018-19

(Disproportionality)

11

White Black Hispanic All Others SWD EL

% of Enrollment 31.2% 40.9% 16.4% 11.5% 13.2% 8.6%

% of OSS 13.3% 69.0% 10.5% 7.1% 24.6% 4.8%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

12

Racial/Ethnic & Gender Breakdown of Students Who Were Suspended

12

Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female

2014-15 11.9% 3.6% 45.3% 23.7% 6.8% 2.3% 4.7% 1.6%

2015-16 10.8% 3.2% 46.3% 23.4% 7.0% 2.9% 4.3% 2.1%

2016-17 12.2% 3.6% 44.3% 23.6% 6.7% 2.7% 4.6% 2.1%

2017-18 10.1% 2.7% 45.6% 24.7% 7.2% 2.6% 4.6% 2.4%

2018-19 10.5% 2.9% 44.7% 24.4% 7.4% 3.1% 5.0% 2.2%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

White Black Hispanic All Others

13

Number of Instructional Days Lost (OSS) Among Groups

13

District White Black Hispanic All Others

2014-15 24,618 3,202 18,111 2,105 1,201

2015-16 27,938 3,191 20,668 2,542 1,537

2016-17 25,701 3,027 19,111 2,079 1,485

2017-18 25,565 2,475 19,317 2,227 1,545

2018-19 25,267 2,637 18,766 2,300 1,563

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

14

Average Number of Instructional Days Lost per Student Suspended (OSS) Among Groups

14

District White Black Hispanic All Others

2014-15 7.2 5.8 7.7 6.5 5.6

2015-16 7.3 5.7 7.8 6.5 6.3

2016-17 7.2 5.6 7.9 6.3 6.1

2017-18 7.2 5.4 7.6 6.3 6.3

2018-19 7.0 5.5 7.6 6.1 6.1

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

15

Average Number of Instructional Days Lost per Student Suspended (OSS) by Race & Gender

2018-19

15

District White Black Hispanic All Others

Male 7.2 5.4 7.9 6.1 6.4

Female 7.0 6.0 7.4 6.2 5.7

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

16

Average Number of Instructional Days Lost per Student Suspended (OSS) by Race & Gender

16

Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female

2014-15 6.0 5.4 8.1 7.0 6.7 6.0 5.7 5.3

2015-16 5.9 4.9 8.0 7.3 6.9 5.6 6.7 5.4

2016-17 5.3 5.3 8.0 7.6 6.7 5.4 6.1 6.0

2017-18 5.7 4.7 8.1 6.6 6.2 6.8 6.3 6.2

2018-19 5.4 6.0 7.7 7.4 6.1 6.2 6.4 5.7

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

White Black Hispanic All Others

17

Risk of Suspension by Race/Ethnicity and Gender

2018-19(Relative Risk Index)

17

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

White vs. Black OverallWhite Males vs. Black Males

White Females vs. Black Females

White Males vs. Black Females

18

# of Students with Multiple Suspensions by Racial/Ethnic Group

2018-19

18

White Black Hispanic All Others

1 405 1,810 308 201

2-3 259 1,735 230 168

4 or More 122 1,325 102 91

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

Suspensions in Context

19

20

# of Students Suspended by Grade

20

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

OSS 2017-18 (Total 4,141) 48 70 107 112 161 179 532 496 502 673 545 439 277

OSS 2018-19 (Total 4,082) 44 68 65 96 114 173 475 628 575 699 520 354 271

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

21

Elementary School Suspension Rates 2018-19

21

Vandalia: 12.4%

Parkview: 8.1%

Wiley: 5.6%

Bessemer: 6.9%

Washington: 6.2%

22

Top 5 Elementary Schools with Student Suspensions2018-19

22

School % of Students Suspended

Performance Composite

% Economically Disadvantaged

% Black & Hispanic

Vandalia 12.4 31.3 85.6 86.9

Parkview 8.1 33.2 95.2 87.5

Bessemer 6.9 34.5 89.7 90.3

Washington 6.2 32.2 83.7 96.6

Wiley 5.6 26.7 96.4 96.2

23

Top 5 Middle School Suspension Rates 2018-19

23

Western Middle: 18.0% Swann: 16.0%

Northeast Middle: 17.3%

Ferndale: 24.3%

Jackson: 21.7%

24

Top 5 Middle Schools with Student Suspensions2018-19

24

Schools % of Students Suspended

Performance Composite

% Economically Disadvantaged

% Black & Hispanic

Ferndale 24.3 36.3 78.4 68.4

Jackson 21.7 40.0 82.3 84.6

Western Middle 18.0 50.2 77.0 75.5

Northeast Middle 17.3 44.8 76.9 75.1

Swann 16.0 46.5 72.5 83.1

25

Top 5 High School Suspension Rates 2018-19

25

Northeast High: 17.0%

Andrews: 15.0%

Smith: 19.5%

Eastern: 10.6%

Dudley: 14.6%

26

Top 5 High Schools with Student Suspensions2018-19

26

Schools % of Students Suspended

Performance Composite

% Economically Disadvantaged

% Black & Hispanic

Smith 19.5 24.2 78.4 81.5

Northeast High 17.0 36.5 74.5 72.3

Andrews 15.0 30.0 74.3 81.7

Dudley 14.6 32.5 81.6 92.8

Eastern 10.6 47.3 63.8 64.6

27

Relationship Between Suspensions and Academic/Non-Academic Measures

2018-19

27

High correlations (close to 1 or -1) indicate strong relationships between the % of students suspended in schools and other school characteristics or performance measures.

Elementary MiddleHigh

(Traditional Only)

Economically Disadvantaged 0.41 0.59 0.86

Performance Composite -0.57 -0.77 -0.78

Black Enrollment 0.53 0.39 0.80

Black & Hispanic Enrollment 0.47 0.40 0.89

28

Suspensions among

Students with

Disabilities

29

GCS Disability Category By Race/Ethnicity2018-19

29

Disability Category % Black % Hispanic % White

Serious Emotional Disability 57% 5% 27%

Traumatic Brain Injury 49% 14% 28%

Multi-Handicapped 41% 15% 33%

Other Health Impairment/Orthopedic 49% 9% 34%

Development Delay/Intellectual Disability 56% 13% 20%

Specific Learning Disability 49% 20% 23%

Autistic 46% 12% 31%

Deaf/Blind or Visually/Hearing Impaired 28% 21% 34%

Speech-Language 38% 13% 41%

30

Rate of Suspensions vs. Enrollment by Disability Status

2018-19

30

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Enrollment OSS

31

Rate of Suspensions vs. Enrollment by Disability Status (Top 3) and Race

2018-19

31

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Wh

ite

Bla

ck

His

pan

ic

All

Oth

ers

Wh

ite

Bla

ck

His

pan

ic

All

Oth

ers

Wh

ite

Bla

ck

His

pan

ic

All

Oth

ers

Serious Emotional Specific LD Ortho/Other

Enrollment OSS

32

Suspensions Over Time byRace/Ethnicity and SWD

32

District SWD White SWD Black SWD Hispanic SWD All Others SWD

2014-15 10% 6% 14% 7% 8%

2015-16 12% 6% 17% 8% 10%

2016-17 11% 6% 16% 7% 9%

2017-18 11% 5% 16% 6% 9%

2018-19 10% 6% 15% 5% 12%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

33

Percentage of SWD Students Suspended Among Each Group

2018-19

33

White Black Hispanic All Others

SWD 28% 26% 18% 20%

Non SWD 72% 74% 82% 80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

34

Context &

Considerations

35

Historical Context35

• BOE Achievement Gap Committee established

• Office of Equity established

• Groundwater Analysis Report (Analysis includes racial disparities in student achievement outcomes and student discipline)

• Race equity training implemented

• October 2011, BOE revises Board Policy JD-P to include statutory changes and limiting consequences for Rules 6 & 8 to ISS for initial infractions and long-term suspension only when aggravating circumstances are present

• In 2012, BOE includes Goal II.F. Decrease % of Suspensions for Rules 6 & 8 and Goal II.G. Decrease % of Suspensions Overall in 2016 Strategic Plan

• BOE strategic focus on reducing suspensions for Rules 6 & 28 along with improved data collection and training for GCS educators leads to reduction of suspensions by the thousands by SY2015-16

• Partnership with the Collaborative for Academic, Social, & Emotional Learning (CASEL) began 2018-19

• Educators’ Handbook implementation in July 2019

Next Steps

36

37

Next Steps

37

• Provide professional development on: (1)the impact of adverse childhood experiences; (2)trauma informed care in schools utilizing trauma informed delivery system; and (3)adult social emotional learning

• Ensure continuation and expansion of race equity training for all educational personnel

• Provide discipline data tools training for administrators & school leadership teams focused on utilizing and analyzing the reports available in Educators Handbook

• Determine school level specific professional development and supports based on data trends

• Continue focused bullying prevention supports for schools and parents

• Conduct an analysis of discipline referral types to identify strategies and supports for adults and students

• Continue to work with Chief District Court Judge and law enforcement ondevelopment and implementation of School Justice Partnership

top related