geoffrey stano– nasa / sport – ensco, inc. brian carcione– nws huntsville jason burks– nws...

New Total Lightning Visualizations

Expanding Utility and UsabilityGeoffrey Stano – NASA / SPoRT – ENSCO, Inc.

Brian Carcione – NWS Huntsville

Jason Burks – NWS Huntsville

Southern Thunder Workshop, Norman, OK 11-14 July 2011

Objectives

• Available in decision support tools• Synthesize data

o “At a glance” analysis• Complement existing tools

oRadaroVertically Integrated Ice

• Expand Utility

Factoring In AWIPS II

NALMA and Radar in AWIPS II

• Mandatory with WFOs• AWIPS II Advantages

oMore fidelityoMore optionsoMore flexibility

• SPoRT has fully functional plug-in

Source Densities (Interpolated)

Source Densities (Not

Interpolated)

Source Densities (Basic)

Importance of Visualizations

• Essentially different products• Can be just different color

curves• Provide alternate analyses

oRequires cautionoToo many will not allow

use in a timely fashion• Expand utility

oMore than lightning jumpso Improved lightning safetyoBetter support to public

Source Densities (Enhanced)

Source Densities (Emphasis)

Where We Are Now

Source Density in AWIPS IIFlash Extent Density in AWIPS II

Flash Origin Density

• Also Flash Initiation Density• Emphasize storm cores• Less cluttered than others• Lose spatial data• Greatly benefited by AWIPS II• Variant used at Spring

Program

Maximum Density

• Max observation of lightning for each grid point for period of time• “Poor man’s” trending

productoCompare to current obso Is a jump occurring?

• Great lightning safety tooloSpatial extent of lightning

over time• Variant used at Spring

Program

Rate of Change

• Simplistic take on Lightning Jump Algorithm (LJA)• Gives standard deviation

from base value for each grid point• Requires no cell tracker• Interesting, but flags storm

advection

Improved Rate of Change

• Similar to Rate of Change product• Try to account for advection• Baseline uses surrounding

grid boxes• Little better than the original

Rate of Change visualization

Limited To Only Two Dimensions

• Ground-based total lightning has 3D component• AWIPS I is too slow to use• AWIPS II has ability, but

usable?oHow fast easy will it be?

• Not usable with GLM dataoMay gain ideas to use

GLM• Can we incorporate height

data?AWIPS I Cross

Section

3 km4 km5 km6 km

Source Height Display

• Use 3D LMA observations• Plot altitudes of highest

sources• Get sense of updraft strength• Lose actual density

information• Can we combine height and

obs?

Variant Height Products

• Average source height• Better core observation

• Maximum height with time• Like the max density

• Height rate of change• (not shown)• Like the rate of change• Benefit from cell tracker

Average Source Height

Max Source Height (30 min)

End Goals

Products and visualizations need “at a glance” utility

• Need to be viable in time sensitive warning decision situations

All of these ideas can be applied to the following

• Warning decision support

• Lightning safety

• GLM risk reduction All require training! Some cases for non-AWIPS work

• Google Earth displays

• Support real-time research

• Support emergency managers

Summary

Geoffrey Stanogeoffrey.stano@nasa.gov

These are test ideas

• Working with partners to determine best to transition Some already used by the Spring Program

• Variants based on SPoRT’s Pseudo-Geostationary Lightning Mapper

Lightning can support more than just lightning jumps and severe weather

Determine how best to combine lightning observations with other data

• Feedback requesting time series plot and an IC – CG ratio product

• GOES-R era bringing even more data

• Improved computing bringing more models

• Need to avoid overloading end users

Questions?

Spare Images