fuel treatment making a difference

Post on 13-Jan-2016

20 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Fuel Treatment Making a Difference. Steve Harbert Tim Rich. Burn Boss Refresher February 2009. How can Fuel Treatments “Make a Difference”?. Ecosystem Restoration Protection. Why here, why now?. Why be Effective?. Available FS and BLM land in PNW: 20.7 MM acres - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Fuel TreatmentMaking a Difference

Steve Harbert Tim Rich

Burn Boss RefresherFebruary 2009

1Burn Boss Refresher 2009

How can Fuel Treatments “Make a Difference”?

• Ecosystem Restoration

• Protection

Why here, why now?

2Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Why be Effective?Available FS and BLM land in PNW: 20.7 MM acres2008 Accomplishment / % of available: 130 M acres = 0.6 %In 15 years, % of available treated: 9% (6%/decade) Wildfire Acres/year

309 M Acres

3Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Principles of Stand Level Fuel Treatments

1. Surface fuels2. Ladder fuels3. Canopy fuels4. Leave large trees

4Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Treatment Strategies

Fuel Breaks

DFPZ Extensive vs. Intensive

SPOTS

5Burn Boss Refresher 2009

SPOTS

6Burn Boss Refresher 2009

An Assessment of Fuel Treatments on Selected Fires in the Pacific Northwest

A report to Fire Directors Ken Snell and Carl GossardUSDA Forest Service, Region 6; Oregon State BLMOctober 2007

7Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Three Fires, Three Strategies

Monument Fire – Umatilla NF GW Fire – Deschutes NF Egley Fire – Burns Fire Zone

8Burn Boss Refresher 2009

9Burn Boss Refresher 2009

10Burn Boss Refresher 2009

11Burn Boss Refresher 2009

GW Fire Results

12Burn Boss Refresher 2009

13Burn Boss Refresher 2009

July 6th to July 22nd

14Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Egley Complex Assessment

42% of assessment area had treatments High severity areas were statistically

different Post-fire photographic evidence supports

the fuels treatment effectiveness conclusion.

In some treatment areas weather overpowered the veg/fuels treatment.

Newer treatments were more effective.

15Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Egley Prescriptions

Underburning (3869 acres) Marginally significant

Commercial Harvest (17990 acres) Wide variety, and significant

Pre-commercial thin and piling (~16940 acres) Very significant Changed Rx intensity

16Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Egley - 220 spur

Treated area south of 220 spurUntreated area south of 220 spur

17Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Egley - BARC Severity

Egley Complex - BARC Severity

40%41%

27% 37%

23% 18%

3%9%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No Treatment 57,456 ac. Treated 41,070 ac.

NO DATA

UNBURNED / VERY LOW

LOW SEVERITY

MODERATE

HIGH SEVERITY

18Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Egley – Treatment Age

Egley Complex - Percent of high and moderate severity by age class of treatment

45.0%

30.7%

1.1%

2.9%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Treatment Age >12 years old Treatment Age <11 years old

Moderate Severity High Severity

19Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Fuels Program Validation

When the fuels specialist asks… “Where will you have your next big fire, and where are you going to treat?”

Do you have an answer?Develop a strategy, articulate,

monitor.

20Burn Boss Refresher 2009

RecommendationsA fuels strategy

The Burn Boss should know the fuels and vegetation strategy;

Has a responsibility during burn plan preparation to help craft specific burn plan objectives:

Implements the burn plan to help achieve the overall strategy.

21Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Steve and Liz Harbert
2nd bullet was a recommendation from the assessment.I suggest using that as the lead and add a couple of subbullets.

RecommendationsSuppression Effectiveness

Enhancing suppression effectiveness should be part of the fuels/veg strategy. Treatment location

Use past treatment data in developing wildfire strategies. Treatments should become an integral part

of WFSA/WFDSS development. Treatment maps should be a part of the

briefing package given to Incident Management Teams.

22Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Steve and Liz Harbert
Again 2nd bullet directly from the assessment.2nd and 3rd sentences become sub-bullets.

RecommendationsLeave some tracks

Map treatments Data in GIS is best Planned vs. implemented When Maintenance program Suppression There is a formal monitoring process Part of post burn activities

23Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Steve and Liz Harbert
Same.Re-enforce collecting data, storing in GIS and using for long term monitoring.

Questions?

Treatment Effectiveness Report: http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fireuse/success/success-stories.html

Angora Fire Report: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/angorafuelsassessment/

Remote Sensing Application Center (BARC, BAER & MTBS):

http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/rsac/baer/barc.html

Lessons Learned Center: http://www.wildfirelessons.net/Home.aspx

24Burn Boss Refresher 2009

Steve and Liz Harbert
Same.Re-enforce collecting data, storing in GIS and using for long term monitoring.

top related