frank chiappetta
Post on 08-Nov-2014
650 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Combining Electronic Detonators with Stem Charges and Air Decks
by
R. Frank Chiappetta, MSc. P.Eng.Explosives Applications Engineer
Blasting Analysis International, Inc.Allentown, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Perth, AustraliaDrill and Blast 2010
October 12 - 14 , 2010
2010, Blasting Analysis International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
c
What are the 3 most important things in blasting?
1 ) Drilling Controls
2 ) Drilling Controls
3 ) Drilling Controls
Mine
• Explosive energy• Energy distribution in rock mass• Timed and controlled release of energy
Mill
1
For illustrative purposes only
Major Sources of Oversize
6
1
2
3
4
5
Stemming
Explosive column
Subgrade
Bench top
Collar / Top Stemming
Free Face
Toe & Subgrade
Corners & Irregular Bench
Intact Massive Seams
Imbedded Conglomerate Boulders
13
2
4
5
8
6
7
9
10
11
12
Pit floor
Stemming volume can be 20 – 50% of blast volume
1
Shot Muck Pile
Original collar or top stemming
Oversize and Poor Fragmentation
Excellent Fragmentation
Shot Muck Pile
Oversize from collar (top stemming zone)
Boulders require secondary drilling and
blasting
Shot Muck Pile
Oversize from collar (top stemming zone)
Purposely Masked
Multiple dozers skim oversize and push it over bench face for shovels to dig – Tremendous re-handling of oversize!
Shot Muck Pile
Purposely masked
Shovels re-handle oversize for loading into haulage trucks!
Shot Muck Pile
Oversize Galore!
Normal Stemming
Explosive column
Decreased Stemming
Decreased Stemming
But, there are definite limits as to how much the top stemming can be reduced!
Decreasing stemming is often used to increase fragmentation in the collar zone (top stemming).
Uncontrolled Shot - Severe Flyrock & AirblastTop stemming too small
Unintentional Flyrock Damage
Secondary BreakageDrilling & Blasting Shaped Charge
Impact Hammer Drop Weight
Special Drop Weight
Special Drop Weight
Special Drop Weight
Secondary Blasting
Extreme Secondary Blasting
SD - Scaled Depth of Burial Calculations
SD = D/W1/3
D = SD * W1/3
W = ( D/SD)3
W = Mass of explosives equivalent to 10 explosive diameters.
D = Distance from surface to center of stem charge.
SD = Selected Scaled Depth of Burial.
D
W
Stemming
Length of W D = Distance from surface to center of W
W = Weight of explosive occupied in top of explosive column, equivalent to the length of 10 borehole or explosive diameters
Surface
L
If borehole diameter is less than 4-in (102 mm), use 8 explosive diameters to calculate W.
D
W
Stemming6.0 m (19.6 ft)
= 2.70 m (8.9 ft)
Length of W D = Distance from surface to center of W
W = Weight of explosive occupied in top of explosive column, equivalent to the length of 10 borehole or explosive diameters
Borehole diameter = 270 mm (10 5/8 in)
Explosive density = 1.27 g/cc
Surface
Imperial Units Metric Units
Explosive density = 1.27 g/ccExplosive diameter = 10.625 in
Stemming = 19.7 ft
Length of 10 borehole diameters = (10.625 in/12 in) x 10 = 8.9 ft
One linear foot of explosives at a density of 1.27 g/cc in a 10.625 in hole weighs 50.3 lbs.
Thus, W = 8.9 x 50.3 = 445 lbs
W1/3 = 4451/3 = 7.62 lbs1/3
D = Stemming + ½ (L)
SD =DW1/3
24.2
7.6= 3.18=
and
Explosive density = 1.27 g/ccExplosive diameter = 270 mm
Stemming = 6.0 m
Length of 10 borehole diameters = (270 mm/1000 mm) x 10 = 2.7 m
One linear meter of explosives at a density of 1.27 g/cc in a 270 mm hole weighs 72.5 Kg.
Thus, W = 6.0 x 72.5 = 201 Kg
W1/3 = 2011/3 = 5.84 Kg1/3
SD =D
W1/3
7.35
5.84= 1.26=
and
= 19.6 + ½ (8.9) = 24.2
D = Stemming + ½ (L)
= 6.0 + ½ (2.70) = 7.35
Alternatively, D = SD x W1/3 and W = (D/SD)3
L
© 1990,Blasting Analysis International, Inc.All Rights Reserved
SD = D/W1/3
Significance of SD value is illustrated in next slide.
SD = 0 – 0.600.64 – 0.88
0.92 – 1.40
1.44 – 1.80
1.84 – 2.402.40 +
Metric Units(m/Kg1/3)
SD = 0 – 1.5 1.6 – 2.22.3 – 3.5
3.6 – 4.5
4.6 – 6.06.0 +
Imperial Units
(ft/lb1/3)
Significance of SD (Scaled Depth of Burial)© 1990, 2008 Blasting Analysis International, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
No fallback
Some fallback
Uncontrolled Energy
Violent flyrock, airblast, noise and dust.
Very fine fragmentation.
Good craters.
Controlled EnergyGood fragmentation.
Maximum volume of broken rock in collar zone.
Acceptable vibration/airblast.
Good heave and muck pile mound.
Larger fragmentation.
Reduced volume of broken rock in collar zone.
Acceptable vibration/airblast.
Reduced heave and muck pile mound.
No flyrock.
Very Controlled Energy
Small surface disturbance
Insignificant surface effects
Minimal Surface Effects
No breakage
zone
SD - Scaled Depth of Burial equations can be used to calculate:
Top stemming
Stab charge quantity
Stem charge quantity
Top Stemming = (SD x (Ø 3 x ρ /127500)1/3) – (Ø /200)
Where: SD = Scaled depth of burial (Kg/m1/3)Ø = Explosive diameter (mm) ρ = Explosive density (g/cc)
SD = 0.92 – 1.40 m/Kg1/3
Example Calculation
Hole diameter = 229 mm
Explosive density = 1.25 g/cc
Top stemming
Metric Units
Top Stemming when SD is selected as 1.2
= (1.2 x (2293 x 1.25/127500)1/3) – (229/200)
= (1.2 x (12008989 x 1.25/127500)1/3) – (1.15)
= (1.2 x (117.74)1/3) – (1.15)
= (1.2 x 4.89) – (1.15)
= (5.87) – (1.15)
= 4.72 5 m
= (SD x (Ø3 x ρ /127500)1/3) – (Ø /200)
Imperial Units
Top Stemming = (SD x (Ø3 x ρ x 0.284)1/3) – (0.417 x Ø)
Where: SD = Scaled depth of burial (lb/ft1/3)
Ø = Explosive diameter (in) ρ = Explosive density (g/cc)
SD = 2.3 – 3.5 ft/lb1/3
Example Calculation
Hole diameter = 9 inExplosive density = 1.25 g/cc
Top Stemming when SD is selected as 3.0
= (3.0 x (93 x 1.25 x 0.284)1/3) – (0.417 x 9)
= (3.0 x (729 x 1.25 x 0.284)1/3) – (3.75)
= (3.0 x (258.80)1/3) – (3.75)
Top stemming
= (3.0 x 6.36) – (3.75)
= (19.08) – (3.75)
= 15.3 ft
= (SD x (Ø3 x ρ x 0.284)1/3) – (0.417 x Ø)
For illustrative purposes only
Distributing More Energy in Collar Zone
2
3
Explosive column
Subgrade
Bench top
Cartridge or Decoupled Charge in Stemming
Stab or Pilot Hole
Stem Charge
Pit floor
1
Stemming
1 23
Cartridge or decoupled explosives placed
within the top stemming
Method 1
Cartridge or decoupled explosives in top stemming
introduce too much risk as a top load in creating severe
blowouts, flyrock and airblast.
Cartridge or Decoupled Explosives
Laser Profiler
Method 1
Production Holes
Stab Hole
Subgrade
Stab or Pilot Hole – Placed In Between Production Holes
Stab holes are generally not popular
because…
* Requires additional holes & drilling.
* Restricts vehicle traffic on blast block.
* Unsafe to drive over loaded/unloaded holes.
Method 2
Could be illegal in some countries.
Production Holes
Stem Charge
Subgrade
Stem Charge – Placed Inside Stemming Column
Stemming
D = 50 – 65% of Stemming
Good distribution of energy in the collar zone.
Stab hole depth is generally drilled 50 – 65% of the normal stemming column.
Stem charge must be calculated precisely with SD = 1.0 – 1.6. A good starting point is 1.3 for typical applications.
If using electronic detonators, the stem and main charges should be fired instantaneously.
If using Nonel, it is critical that the stem charge is always fired before the main charge.
D
Method 3
Increase Stemming When Using a Stem Charge
Normal Stemming
Explosive column
Increased Stemming Stem Charge
Method 3
Uses less explosives per hole.Much better fragmentation in collar zone.Controlled flyrock, airblast and dust.
SD = 0 – 0.600.64 – 0.88
0.92 – 1.40
1.44 – 1.80
1.84 – 2.402.40 +
Metric Units(m/Kg1/3)
SD = 0 – 1.5 1.6 – 2.22.3 – 3.5
3.6 – 4.5
4.6 – 6.06.0 +
Imperial Units
(ft/lb1/3)
Significance of SD (Scaled Depth of Burial)© 1990, 2008 Blasting Analysis International, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
No fallback
Some fallback
Uncontrolled Energy
Violent flyrock, airblast, noise and dust.
Very fine fragmentation.
Good craters.
Controlled EnergyGood fragmentation.
Maximum volume of broken rock in collar zone.
Acceptable vibration/airblast.
Good heave and muck pile mound.
Larger fragmentation.
Reduced volume of broken rock in collar zone.
Acceptable vibration/airblast.
Reduced heave and muck pile mound.
No flyrock.
Very Controlled Energy
Small surface disturbance
Insignificant surface effects
Minimal Surface Effects
No breakage
zone
W = (D/SD)3
Example Stem Charge Calculation
= (3.9/1.2)3
= (3.25)3
= 34 Kg
D = 65% Stemming = 3.9 m
W = Stem Charge Stemming
6m
Surface
SD is chosen as 1.2
SD = D/W1/3
D = SD * W1/3
Important Stem Charge Cautions
6 mD = 3.9 m
34 Kg
Stem charge quantity and placement must be fairly exact!
With electronic detonators, fire stem charge and main charge instantaneously.
With pyrotechnic detonators, always fire the stem charge first, before main charge.
The same in-hole pyrotechnic delays in the stem and main charges have too much scatter. If the main charge fires first, there is a risk that the stem charge could be ejected out with the top stemming.
Advantages of Using a Stem Charge
Decreased explosives per hole, but
Improves fragmentation 5 -10 fold or more in the
stemming zone.Doubling only the normal powder factor (without the use of a stem charge) will have no significant effect on the fragmentation in the collar zone. This was demonstrated with full scale test blasts in Chile to convince mine operators.
Mid column air deck results in a longer lasting pressure pulse on the surrounding rock.
Pressure pulse from a continuous explosive column load.
Time
Explosive deck
Explosive deck
Stemming
Air Deck - Rapidly expanding gasses collide in center of
air deckP
ress
ure
Effects of a mid-column air deck versus a full column load
Primers in each explosive deck must be placed equidistant from center of mid-column air deck.
Explosive deck
Explosive deck
Stemming
A single air deck placed anywhere in the explosive
column will:
Air Deck
Air Deck
Reduce ground vibrations and fines.
Bench Top
Floor
Subgrade
Unbroken Rock
End Charge Effects and Subgrade Drilling
P1
P2P2
On reflection at bottom of hole,
Pressure P2 = (2 – 7) x P1 due to combined effects of shock wave reflection at hole bottom and the immediate
gas pressure buildup.
Surface
Stemming
Explosive Column
Power Deck
1 m Air Deck
Coal No coal damage
Effect of Bottom Hole Air DeckReduces explosives, vibrations and fines.
Reduces/eliminates subgrade drilling.
Coal
Primer must be placed directly on top of air-deck to succeed in breaking to bottom of hole.
This is critical.
P1
P2P2
Surface
Stemming
Explosive Column
1 m Air Deck
Coal
Effect of Raising Primer Over Bottom Hole Air Deck
Coal
Solid, unbroken rockTargeted Floor
Shock wave has disappeared before reaching bottom of hole.
P2 is now less than P1, and also less than the compressive strength of the rock.
Poor fragmentation
Initial energy from primer and explosives migrating into the rock mass negates the bottom hole air
deck.
Surface
Coaxial cable to TDR VOD instrument
Coaxial cable to TDR VOD instrument
Stemming
Explosive
Subgrade
3-In (76 mm) diameter hole drilled from bench face to intersect bottom of hole.
Surface
Coaxial cable to TDR VOD instrument
Coaxial cable to TDR VOD instrument
Stemming
Explosive
No Subgrade
3-In (76 mm) diameter hole drilled from bench face to intersect bottom of hole.
3.3-ft (1 m) Air Deck
Power Deck Plug
Bottom primer 500 ms
Top backup primer 525 ms
Top backup primer 525 ms
Bottom primer 500 ms
Production Holes = 6½-in.
(165 mm)
Conventional Hole Load With Subgrade
Power Deck Plug at Bottom of Hole With No Subgrade
A B
(a)
(b)
(c)
Bottom Hole Air Deck Measurements.
Surface
Coaxial cable to TDR VOD instrument
Coaxial cable to TDR VOD instrument
Stemming
Explosive
No Subgrade
3-In (76 mm) diameter hole drilled from bench face to intersect bottom of hole.
3.3-ft (1 m) Air Deck
Power Deck Plug
Top backup primer 525 ms
Bottom primer 500 ms
Power Deck Plug at Bottom of Hole With No Subgrade
B
(a)
(b)
(c)
0.00
1.15
2.29
3.44
4.59
5.73D (m)
Primer
Bottom of hole
Gas front velocity through 3-in (76 mm)
hole = 1,500 ft/sec (457 m/s)
Shock wave velocity = 11,000 ft/sec (3354 m/s)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Typical Bottom Hole Air Deck Results from VODR System.
Courtesy of International Technologies and BAI.
1.12 2.29 4.86 6.72 8.59 10.46
Time (ms)
Hole Delay = 17 – 42 ms
Row Delay = 65 – 109 ms
Typical Delays with Conventional Non-Electric (Nonel) System
Hole Delay = 1 – 3 ms
Row Delay = 100 – 300 ms
New Delays with Precise Electronic Detonators
0 ms 25 ms 50 ms
0 ms 2 ms 4 ms
Delay Timing
VpVs
VpVs
VpVs
Conventional
Electronic
No interaction of shock/stress
waves
Maximum interaction of shock/stress
waves
0 ms 2 ms 4 ms
= fn (Shock Wave, Vp, Vs, Gas pressure & crack velocity)
Vp Vp
Vs Vs
Vp = Compressional Wave (Sonic velocity of the rock)
Vs = Shear Wave Velocity.
Hole Delay Timing
Calculating Electronic Delay Time Between Holes
T = 0.6 (D/Vp) x 1000
Where:
T = Delay time between holes in a row (ms)
D = Distance between holes in a row (m)
Vp = Compression or sonic wave velocity (m/s)
Example Calculation
Assume hole spacing S = 7 m and Vp = 2800 m/s.
T = 0.6 (S/Vp) x 1000
T = 0.6 (7 m/2800 m/s) x 1000
T = 1.5 ms Future electronic detonator precision must be increased to 0.1 ms (100 us), because current electronic detonator timing can only be selected in increments of 1 ms. In this example, the choice is either 1 or 2 ms.
Vp & Vs are an important dynamic rock properties because they are a
direct function of:
• Young’s modulus (elasticity)• Poisson’s ratio (brittleness)• Rock Density (mass/unit volume)• RQD (Integrity of rock mass due to frequency of
discontinuities, joints, voids, etc.)
Increasing fragmentation with lower overall mining system
costs
Top stemming
Explosive column
500 ms
525 ms
0 ms
0 ms 0 ms
0 ms
0 ms
0 ms
Stem charge
1 m Air Decks
Combining Electronic Detonators, Air Decks & Stem Charges
0 ms
0 ms
Stem charge
1 m Air Decks
A B EDC
2009, Blasting Analysis International, Inc. All Rights Reserved
c
0 ms0 ms
Primary Objectives Were:
Improve fragmentation
Increase plant throughput
Required 87% of fragmentation @ ≤ 6 in.
Minimize vibrations on slopes
Copper Mine in Chile using 9 7/8 & 10 5/8 in holes.Case History
No. 1
Copper Mine in Chile
No explosives in collar.Represents 40 – 50%
of blast block.
Fragmentation here is OK
Subgrade
Explosive
Stemming
18 m (60 ft)
Normal energy distribution in a hole load resulted in excessive
oversize in collar.
Case History No. 1
Copper Mine in Chile
Stem charge 30 Kg
Mid-column air deck = 1 m
(3.3 ft)Subgrade
Explosive deck
Stemming
18 m (60 ft)
Mid-column air deck and stem charge provide a much better
energy distribution in blast block.
Explosive deck
Eliminated 90 – 95% of oversize in collar.Case History
No. 1
Normal shot design. Modified shot design.
Hole delays = 17 – 42 ms.Row delays = Constant 42 or 67 ms.
Normal top stemming.
Nonelectric detonators.
Hole delays = 2 ms.Row delays = Increasing 125 – 250 ms.
Stem charge & mid-column air deck.
Electronic detonators.
Normal Modified Excessive oversize
Very little oversize
Dividing line between normal and modified
blasts.
Case History No. 1
Copper Mine in Chile
Normal Blast Design Results
Case History No. 1
Hole delay = 2 ms Row delays = 125 - 250 ms
Stem chargeMid-column air deck
Digging rates increased 50 -100% due to oversize reduction.
Modified shot
South Africa Coal
Normal shot design results
Expl./delay increased 17-fold.Peak vibrations - Unchanged
Case History No. 2
Hole delay = 1 ms Row delays = 100 - 300 msStem charge
Eliminated all oversize in
collar
Oversize
South Africa Coal
Case History No. 2
Quarry – Maryland, USA
Expl./delay increased 4-fold.Peak vibrations - Reduced
Case History No. 3
Hole delay = 2 ms Row delays = 125 -250 msStem charge
Improved fragmentation in collar by 10-fold
Massive granite
Stem charge alone eliminated oversize in collar for the dragline
Stemming
Main Charge
Coal Mine – South Africa
Case History No. 4
Coal
Massive sandstone
Shale
Quarry – Alabama, USA
Expl./delay increased 4-fold.Peak vibrations - Unchanged
Case History No. 5
Hole delay = 2 ms Row delays = 100 -250 msStem charge
Oversize in collar reduced 5-fold
Flyrock controls needed because shot was directly underneath power lines.
Normal stemming.
Copper Mine in Chile – Test Shots Done on Same Bench and with Same Orientation.
Case History No. 6
Hole delay = Nonel 42 ms.Row delays = 92 ms
Stem charge.Hole delay = 2 ms.Row delays = 100 - 300 ms
Oversize in collar completely eliminated
Copper Mine in Chile
Case History No. 6
Electronic Detonators, 2 ms Hole Delay, Stem Charges and 100 – 300 ms Row Delays
Quarry 1 – Pennsylvania, USA
Expl./delay increased 4-fold.Peak vibrations - UnchangedCase History
No. 7
Hole delay = 2 ms Row delays = 150 - 250 msBottom hole air deck
No back spill
Good power trough
CAP ROCK PROBLEM
Quarry 2 – Pennsylvania, USACase History No. 8
BEFORE
Quarry 2 – Pennsylvania, USA
Case History No. 8
After
Quarry 2 – Pennsylvania, USA
Expl./delay increased 8-fold.Peak vibrations – Increased only 25%
Case History No. 8
Hole delay = 2 ms Row delays = 90 - 300 msStem charge
Quarry 3 – Pennsylvania, USA
Before
Case History No. 9
After
Quarry 3 – Pennsylvania, USA
Expl./delay increased 8-fold.Peak vibrations – Increased only 30%
This oversize came from
corner
Case History No. 9
After
Quarry 3 – Pennsylvania, USA
Expl./delay increased 8-fold.Peak vibrations – Increased only 30%Case History
No. 9
Hole delay = 2 ms Row delays = 100 - 300 ms
Stem chargeMid-column air deck
Quarry 4 – Pennsylvania, USA
Case History No. 10
Electronic detonators Mid-column air deck = 2 m
Explosives reduced 12 – 18%. No change in fragmentation.
Australia
Hole delay = 2 msRow delays 100 – 300 ms
Case History No. 11
Iron Ore
Digging rates increased 40 – 45%
No back break or back spill
Power trough in back of shot
Case History No. 11
AustraliaIron Ore
Deck delays = 0 ms Row delays = 100 - 300 ms
Stem chargesBottom hole air deck
Hole delay = 2 ms
Stab holes
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
H9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19
Powder factor = 0.60 Kg/m3 with stab holes. Hole diameter = 229 mm (9-in).Drill pattern = square or staggered
Section B Section C
Scale (Meters)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Stemming 5.0 m
Explosive column
Subgrade
2.0 m2.0 m
17.5 m
4.0 m
Stab hole
5.5 Kg 5.5 Kg
1.5 Kg
44 Kg 44 Kg
Target Elevation
Holes intersecting 5 m coal Holes intersecting 5 m and 2m coal
7.5
m
7.5
m
Coal
seam
Coal seam
Case History No. 13
Single Row Blast
Stemming
Explosive column
180 ft (55m)
500 ms
525 ms
525 ms
0 ms
0 ms
0 ms
0 ms
0 ms
Nonelectric Detonator Timing Electronic Detonator TimingHole Delay = 42 ms Hole Delay = 10 ms
Bottom Hole Initiation Multiple Point Initiation
A – Conventional loading and timing
Case History No. 13
Objective was to lower muck pile height for safety
Quarry 5 – Pennsylvania, USA
B – New loading and timing
Testing multiple point initiation
versus bottom hole initiation
Muckpile height of nonelectric blast.
Muckpile height of electronic blast.
A
B
Case History No. 13
Quarry 5 – Pennsylvania, USA Multiple point initiation and smaller hole delay (with same powder factor), results in greater cast and lower muck pile height.
In Conclusion – Improved BlastResults Depend on Combining:• Good drilling and field controls (Over 50%
of blasting problems).• Precise electronic detonators.• Stem Charges.• Very short delays between holes.• Long progressively increasing row delays.• Bottom & mid-column air decks.• Multiple point initiation within borehole.
Combining Electronic Detonators with Stem Charges and Air Decks
by
R. Frank Chiappetta, MSc. P.Eng.Explosives Applications Engineer
Blasting Analysis International, Inc.Allentown, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Perth, AustraliaDrill and Blast 2010
October 12 - 14 , 2010
2010, Blasting Analysis International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
c
top related