fr4.l10.3: how does dew affect l-band backscatter? analysis of pals data at the iowa validation site...
Post on 30-May-2015
646 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Brian Hornbuckle,Tracy Rowlandson, Eric Russell
Amy Kaleita, Sally Logsdon,Anton Kruger, Simon Yueh,
and Roger De Roo
How Does Dew Affect L-band Backscatter?Analysis of PALS Data at the Iowa Validation Site
and Implications for SMAP
IGARSS 2010, Honolulu, Hawaii
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
European Space AgencySoil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) in orbit.
L-band brightness temperature.
Spatial resolution: 40 km.
Global-scale measurements of soil moisture at L-band...
NASA Soil Moisture Active-Passive (SMAP)scheduled launch in 2014/2015.
L-band brightness temperature and backscatter.
Spatial resolution: 10 km.
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Are changes in backscatter over short periods of timeonly due to changes in soil moisture?
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
dew frequencyin soybean
SMOS/SMAP overpass
50%
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
PALS visit to Iowa Validation SiteSMAPVEX08
September 23-25, 2008
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Iowa Validation Site
eddy-correlation flux towersfour-component radiation
soil moisture and temperatureprecipitation
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Flights over Iowa Validation Site.
IVSB A
N
footprint size @ 3000 ft AGL
Hypothesis: dew affects the brightness temperatureand radar backscatter.
Timing: PALS flies to catch maximum dew and to observe dew dry-off.
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Soybean plants at IVS on 9/25/2008.
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Can we explain the effect of dew on L-band brightness?
optical depth, Np canopy water, kg m-2
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
optical depth, Np
Hornbuckle et al., 2010, under review, WRR.
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
optical depth, Np
Hornbuckle et al., 2010, under review, WRR.Dew is twice as important as .
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
1 2direct canopybackscatter
canopy-groundor ground-canopy
bistatic scatter
ground-canopy-ground
backscatter
soil backscatterattenuatedby canopy
3 4
How will dew affect L-band backscatter?
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
How will dew affect L-band backscatter?
1 2direct canopybackscatter
canopy-groundor ground-canopy
bistatic scatter
ground-canopy-ground
backscatter
soil backscatterattenuatedby canopy
3 4
Hypothesis: Dew will decrease L-band backscatter.
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
0.6 dB
1.3 dB
0.7 dB
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Can we explain the effect of dew on L-band backscatter?
2 4
4
2 4
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
0.6 dB
1.3 dB
0.7 dB
0
2 4
2 4
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
0.6 dB
1.3 dB
0.7 dB Dew should have the greatest affect
on , but it does not.
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Conclusions
A modest dew increased L-band backscatter from soybean (new science).
increased by 0.6 dB. Soil moisture sensitivity is ~ 0.2 dB per m3 m-3.
Dew affects and more than for a soybean canopy.
Sub-daily change in canopy water caused by dew could produce incorrect SMAP change-detection soil moisture estimates.
A semi-empirical soybean model predicts an increase in L-band backscatterbut incorrectly predicts the relative changes.
Hornbuckle et al., Dew and L-band Backscatter, Implications for SMAP?
Conclusions
A modest dew increased L-band backscatter from soybean (new science).
increased by 0.6 dB. Soil moisture sensitivity is ~ 0.2 dB per m3 m-3.
Dew affects and more than for a soybean canopy.
Sub-daily change in canopy water caused by dew could produce incorrect SMAP change-detection soil moisture estimates.
A semi-empirical soybean model predicts an increase in L-band backscatterbut incorrectly predicts the relative changes.
top related