following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2019/5/2 · following this...
Post on 26-Aug-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 3 0 2019
X NYCALI.A.S. Part(Mendez, J.)
PART 13
13IYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS,Index No. 113781/02; 106690/02
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: //1
/
Joanljasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
SO ORDERED,
F I L E D Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
APR 3 0 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XWARD A. REYNOLDS and CAROL REYNOLDS
Index No. 190276/11Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.O, SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and
cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC.with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant PFIZER INC. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: /
Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.
U. X .i' —' ^^Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
F I L E D MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.
MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
'SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK rprj p n n r=J p;
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 3 0 2019
This Document Relates to: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIndex No.: 109983/08
JOSEPH SAEVAAND
.NORMA SAEVA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Patterson Pump Company, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-
defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Patterson Pump Company,
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, Ndw YorkMJ2&L 2019
Jordan C. Fok, Hs|q.^Attorney for|Pl^^ff(Joseph Saeva"aiBELLUCK & Fox, LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Ker^ahn M. Cook, Esq.Attorney ior DefendantPatterson Pump CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
orma Saeva
SO ORDERED, F IHon. Manuel J. Mendez “raw*
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
MAY 0 2 2019 454-11499
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
e si— , r
APR 3 0 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS UITIGATIONX
WADE M. LEWIS,Index No. 106694/02; 114654/02
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
l / a a / UDated:>/
//LPatrick Efnle^TEs)pWEITZ & LTTXENBERCT700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
MAY 0 2 MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .
APR 3 0 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NfS SUPREME COURT C1VHX NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
nae ~r-BT
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
ALFRED DIFRANCO,Index No. 126681/02; 103527/03
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: /
//
Patrick Eihlevf^s^.WEITZ & lk700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
Joanijasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
NBERG
FSO ORDERED, rasateJHB vte'-ssa if AHon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
MAY 02 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
ff8 . . -• j i— '7 . -
APR 3 0 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) PART 13
COURT - CIVILNYS SUPREME
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 104668/05, 116822/00
LUIGI CRISCI UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yark, Ne-W Yor
Jo Matthew Du Sajnffar, Esq.Attorney fcfDefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
eane,mey for Plaintiff
Luigi CrisciTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. F 533-14G
lam
MAY 02 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
APR 3 0 2019
'^3
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 116819/00
„ PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
PATRICK CURRAN UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewYork. N Yorkmn
§! J '
Matthew I^S^mpar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Johnjpfearie, Esq.ey for Plaintiff
Patrick CurranTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
A
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
533-17A*
MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
This Document Relates to: APR 3 0 2019Index No.: 112280/00
ff5 SUPREME*COURTPATRICK DALY UNOPPOSED SUMMJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
• CIVIL
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
JohnTtearie,At|m-ney for PlaintiffPatrick DalyTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
Matthew D. Sampdr, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F I LMANUEL J. MENDEZj.s.a.
533-10A
MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
This Document Relates to:CIVILIndex No.: 104691/05, 116819/00
JAMES F. DOWLING UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, Nfew York\ '1
John/Dearie,Atjomey for PlaintiffJames F. DowlingTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
Matthew D/Sarppar, Esq.Attorney forDefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
533-17E
MAY 02 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
APR 30 2019PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTThis Document Relates to: - CIVILIndex No.: 104659/05, 112281/00
KALLJO LAIDLA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New.York, b/ew York
Matthew D. ^ampar^sq.Attorney forSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaintiffKalljo LaidlaTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
ant
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 533-15E
FMAY 02 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 30 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 104658/05, 112281/00
LEONARD LESNEFSKY UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York?
MatthewCp. I^mtpar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
John0earie, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffLeonard LesnefskyTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZ C 8 IJ. .S.C
MAY 02 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
533-15A
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IAPR 30 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
• CIVILThis Document Relates to:Index No.: 104666/05, 116819/00
THOMAS MOELLER UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yo
44
JohnE0earie,Attorney for PlaintiffThomas MoellerTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
Matthew ID. Sapapar, Esq.Attorney foFDefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C . 533-17J
FMAY 02 2019
RK'S OFFICECOUNTY CLENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
APR 3 0 2019NYS SUPREMETCOURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:
Index No.: 116828/00
PETER MONGELLO UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yonk, NeW York
7 Matthew DrSampar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
John Dearie, Esq.Attorfiey for PlaintiffPeter MongelloTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
533-18F
MAY 02 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 30 2019This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111582/00
NYS suwJSS&r - CIVILMICHAEL PERAGINO UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
John dearie,Attorney for PlaintiffMichael PeraginoTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
Matthew p. Sampar, Esq.Attorney'feH3efendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
F IMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
R533-7
MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
APR 3 0 2019PART 13
COURT - CIVILNY$ SUPREMEThis Document Relates to:
Index No.: 104687/05, 111754/00
FRED RICCIARDI UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y</rk, New York
Jo Matthew DJSampar, Esq.Attorney far DefendantSimplex Wife #; Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Aj*6mey for PlaintiffFred RicciardiTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C . 533-13E
MAY 02 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
APR 30 2019NYS SUPREMTCOURT - CIVILThis Document Relates to:
Index No.: 104657/05, 112281/00
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, NeW York
JohrvDearie, Esq.A^orney for PlaintiffVictor RodriguezTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
Matthew D. /Sampan; Esq.Attorney foil^DgffendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
533-15Hram
h.jja
MAY 02 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ©IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
ApR 3 0 2019This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 116820/00
JOHN RYBOS UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York4/ 367ho/ 3 I
John Efeane, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffJohn RybosTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
Matthew D. Sampar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C .
533-16C
MAY 0 2 Z019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) APR 3 0 2019
PART 1 TSUPREME COURT
This Document Relates to:- CIVILIndex No.: 104693/05, 116820
FRANK STELLA UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York/V/TT/av?
/Matthew ELAttorney for Defendant
V
Simplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
John Dearie, Esq.Attorney For PlaintiffFrank StellaTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM,P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
par, Esq.
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
533-16G
AT#*GB &*:
MAY 02 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
APR 3 0 20 ]$PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTThis Document Relates to: - CIVIL
Index No.: 104656/05, 112281/00
PATRICK WALSH UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Simplex Wire & Cable Company, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Simplex Wire & Cable
Company, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York
John Matthew D/Snmpar, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSimplex Wire & Cable CompanyMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for PlaintiffPatrick WalshTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.515 Madison Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 980-0404
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C
533-15B[ <«E3tlfSl
MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 30 2019xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 115015/1998
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LINDA BIGAJ, as Executrix for the Estate of LEONARDJOSEPH BIGAJ and LINDA BIGAJ, Individually,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingthe complaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear CanadaInc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
q- 22 .1WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
ByAlexandra E. OberUreksler
(JLS700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
•VR*8*iUsa feta*SO ORDERED: rA33
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MAY 02 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 3 0 2019xNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: NYCALJ.A.S. Part 46(Billings, J.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 107340/2001
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
MARCIA TRUCKS, as Personal Representative for theEstate of WILLIAM L. TRUCKS SR., and MARCIATRUCKS, Individually,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice,
and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada
Inc. are dismissed with prejudi.ce and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
1177 jnL
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.
---
By: By:s
^ ^^pmujornFerlman, Esq. Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
JMiaUrn
SO ORDERED: MAY 0 2 2019Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORKMANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK gg)
APR 3 0 2019IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
This Document Relates to: '&VILIndex No. 190388/10
KATHLEEN DOYLE, Individually and asAdministratrix of the Estate of JOHN D.DOYLE
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valves,
Inc. and Edward Vogt Valve Company (improperly sued as Edward Vogt Valve Company,
individually and as successor to Edwards Valves, Inc.) (“ Flowserve US” ), hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
till I L3New Vorkl, New York
Dated:
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /Wilentz, Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street26th FloorNew York, NY 10038
Brian SorensMcElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Flowserve US, Inc.225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,Honorable Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J.MENDEZ MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
3493815 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 3 0 2019
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUWEMECQURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 121211/00
JANICE WARD, as Executrix of the Estate ofJEROME WARD UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Rockwell Manufacturing Company (hereinafter “ Rockwell” or
“ defendant” ),, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the Complaint and cross-claims against
Rockwell with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Rockwell are dismissed with prejudice and without costs..
New York, New York7/ / , 2019
Dated:
/Brian Sorensen, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant RockwellManufacturing Company225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /Wilentz, Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038
F i r*** sgraw®**
SO ORDERED, MAY 02 2019Honorable Manuel Mendez, J. S. C.
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
j.s.c
3767350v1
APR 3 0 3019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XROBERT JOSEPH SHANSTROM, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of ROBERT J.SHANSTROM,
Index No. 118531/02; 106695/02
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.-X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
4 l ig> j nDated:/
2 J
\/hJoan taasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
JJuMi SiebehEsqWEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Ix-i - h*r \SO ORDERED, MAY 0 2 2019
MANUEL J. MENDEZUN^ECwyR0KRSK0FFICE
J.S. C.
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
APR 3 0 Z019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-X NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION— X«•mum•*r**mm >
JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff(s),Index No. 113781/02; 106690/02
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants — X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it
is,
ORDERED, that, all claims and cross-claims against defendant AMERICAN OPTICAL
CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: /iZ£
Joan Gasior, Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLPOne North Broadway, Ste.1005White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantAmerican Optical Corporation
Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
C lMAY 02 2019
^—COUNTY CLEHIMANUELJ.MENDEZ NEW YORK
* '7*.
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C
- OFFICEJ .S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 3 0 2019
NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)
X PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
Index No: 190092/2009This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
JAMES LYNCH and MARY LYNCH
X
WHEREFORE, defendant CUMMINS, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against CUMMINS, INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant CUMMINS, INC., are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
L!. oxDated: , 2019New York, New York
Charles Ferguson, Esquifre*WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York, 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Johr^S. How^th, /EsquireKefth D. Babula, EsquireWILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, CUMMINS, INC.
SO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.
MAY 02 2019OFFICE‘CCOUNTY CLERK
NEW YORKv O
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 2 6 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.104431/97109676/99
DANIEL P. POLAK
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
Anna M. DiLbnardoAttorneys for Defendant
) Harsco Industrial f/k/a PattersonKelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for Plaintiff wvWeitz & Luxenberg °^ V700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003 u
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. MAY 0 2 2019
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
t SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 121595/98
CHARLES M. WEGENER
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
oDATED:
Noriel L. Sta. MariaAttorneys for DefendantHarsco industrialMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
AttorneysWeitz & L700 Broadway wtn fioorNew York, NY 10003
nerg
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. EJWK* &*;?sraa
MANUEL J. MENDEZ MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
j c r
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 107161/00
RONALD TENEYCK and EDWINATENEYCK
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/aPatterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff J-fJ. V Andrew M. WarshauerWeitz & Luxenberg IJQL, c l/\ ' '" Attorneys for Defendant700 Broadway - 7th floor ^ J Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson
DATED:
./ .Cut!/
KelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
NewYork, NY 10003
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
MAY 0 2 2019
OFF-ICE'CCOUNTY CLERKNEW YORK
O
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 2 6 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT •CIVIL
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 108697/97
NAZZARO SERINO and CHRISTINA SERINO
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Bucyrus International, hereby requests summary judgment inthe above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against defendant, Bucyrus International, with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Bucyrus International, aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg ^700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Anna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantBucyrus InternationalMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJSC.
¥
litres* •V
MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTYNI;EYOBKOFFICE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 2 6 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 109983/08
JOSEPH SAEVA and NORMA SAEVA
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Sur-Seal Gasket &
Packing, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
X-DATED: «r -/yn
Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantSur-Seal Gasket & PackingMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiBelluck & Fox LLP/546 Fifth AveiwyNew York, NY 10036
th Floor
SO ORDERED Si‘'f t
E.., y
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MAY 0 2 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. 3 Of tIK
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 2 6 2019PARI i s
NYS SUPREME COURT Civil
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 110740/06
ELIZABETH KELLY, as Executrix for the Estate ofDONALD P. KELLY, and ELIZABETH KELLY,Individually, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:A
lV \
Colleen M, CroninAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
WeitzBTCuxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
- 7th floor
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.i
MAY 0 2 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
I
KSCfPiCl.COUNTY CLEINEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019
I PART 13I NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVICIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 118724/01
JACK SKELLY
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
iiiMDATED:
MariaNortel L"Attorneys for DefendantHarsco IndustrialMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, SuiteMelville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NYA 10003
has*
MAY 0 2 2019/^X
SO ORDERED COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - U v i:IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 190438/11
MYRIAM GALEANO, Individually and as ProposedExecutrix of the Estate of MANUEL GALEANO,deceased UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Sur-Seal Gasket &
Packing, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
Attorneys for Plaintiff/ l jpBelluck & Fox LLP / /546 Fifth Avenue -|4rth jtfoorNew York, NY 10Q3tr
Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantSur-Seal Gasket & PackingMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
/ VSO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
IRE EG¥!c4iwc::
APR 2 6 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.121985/99105972/00DORA FREEMAN, as Adminstratrix for the Estate of
MARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment In the above
entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and
cross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed
Iwith prejudice and without costs.
Q /O1-' / 1°\DATED:
Andrew M.WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
AttorneysforPlaintiffWeitz & Luxenherg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
F I L E Ttiv -ts-ai
/ \SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. MAY 0 2 2019
MANUEL J. MENDEZ COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 2 6 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.121985/99105972/00
DORA FREEMAN, as Adminstratrix for the Estate ofMARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212/ dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/aPatterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
l/oM /hDATED:
XxAttorndya^for PlaintiffWeitz & LUXOTO^QI700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantHarsco Industrial f/k/a PattersonKelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747 i&
rr\SO ORDERED m «2 mHon. Manuel J. Mendez J. S.C.
S OFFICECOUNTYNSf"oRXMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
RECESSEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019 |
PAH UNY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVItIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.121985/99105972/00
DORA FREEMAN, as Adminstratrix for the Estate ofMARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the' above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Cprp., with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
9i / oai|iftED:
V \
AttomeysforPliwjtifmWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Cm
SO ORDEREDHon, Manuel J, Mendez J.S.C.
MAY 0 ^ 29,9
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
APR 2 6 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALIAS Part 46(Billings, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 117168/04
CARL KENNETH AYLWARD and FRANCES AYLWARD
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
Sam V. ROggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747 tr
700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
fesra*
/'-NSO ORDERED MAY 0 2 MU
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019
PA<RT 13NY$ SUPRSNiE COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 120785/01
ZINA NEWELL, as Executrix for the Estate of JOHNNEWELL, and ZINA NEWELL, Individually
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requests
summary Judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED:
Noriel L. Sta, MariaAttorneys for DefendantHarsco IndustrialMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeltz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C,
MAY 02 2019
COUNTY CLERKNEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. OFFICE'Oo
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK APR 2 6 2019
PART ISNYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 106861/00
ERIK JENSEN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and
cross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
1~ n-i°iDATED:
•V;Vi
1'
NorielL. Sta. MariaAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MAY 0 2 2019MANUEL j. MENDEZJ.S.C. OIFICE‘CCOUNTY CLERK
NEW YORKO
APR 2 6 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVILSEB3
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 106861/00
ERIK JENSEN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.
are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
£ --7 -|?DATED:
i* 'Vm u*Noriel L. Sta. Maria
Attorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, WarnerColeman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenoe&g700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
am
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
MAY 0 2 2019
HK'F OFFICECOUNTY CLEMEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 2 6 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 112648/03
CHARLES DIESSO and PHYLLIS DIESSO
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a Patterson Kelley, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §
3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Harsco Industrial f/k/a
Patterson Kelley, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
s f i r j ^DATED:
Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantHarsco Industrial f/k/a PattersonKelleyMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for Plaintiff lWeitz & Luxenberg ^—700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003Z(l\t 3
SO ORDERED F 1 LHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.MAY 0 2 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
M*NU®L J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
APR 2 6 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No.
CHARLES J. PALMISANO and SUSAN PALMISANO 128019/02105936/03
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
\ /
/
Colleen M. CroninAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for Plaintiff ^ \Weitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDEREDHon, Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C,
F i L •>
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
1i
0 2 20BMMi
top related