floods, paleofloods, and drought: insights from the upper tails katie hirschboeck laboratory of...

Floods, Paleofloods, and Drought:

Insights from the Upper Tails

Katie HirschboeckLaboratory of Tree-Ring Research

University of Arizona

CLIVAR/PAGES/IPCC Drought Implications Workshop November 2003

Paleofloods --

Direct Physical Evidence of

Extreme Hydrological

Events

House, Webb, Baker& Levish (2002)

American Geophysical Union

PALEOFLOOD (def)

A past or ancient flood event which occurred prior to the time of human observation or direct measurement by modern hydrological procedures.

Recent or modern events may also be studied using paleoflood analytical techniques:

HISTORICAL FLOOD

Flood event documented by human observation and recorded prior to the development of systematic streamflow measurements

EXTREME FLOOD IN UNGAGED WATERSHEDS

Paleofloods: Event-Based Information

-- Paleoflood deposits are not proxy indicators of past conditions in which data are filtered through a biological response.

-- The paleoflood deposits are direct physical evidence of the occurrence of individual extreme hydrologic events and corresponding precipitation events.

-- Slackwater deposits and other types of paleostage indicators selectively preserve evidence of only the largest floods . . .

. . . precisely the information that is lacking in the short gaged discharge records of the observational period

Unlike systematic gaged data, paleoflood information is collected & reported in different formats:

• Paleofloods (w/ stage and/or discharge)

• Thresholds

• Non-exceedence bounds

DataType

s

Types of Paleoflood Information

Threshold level = level below which floods are not preserved(over a specific time internal)

only floods which overtop the threshold level leave evidence

Non-exceedance bound = level which has either:

• never been exceeded, or

• has not been exceeded during a specific time interval

PALEOFLOOD = paleoflood stage or discharge estimate

Regional compilations of paleoflood data

Note temporal clustering & episodic behavior

Lisa Ely’s (1997) comparison of SW paleofloods with various paleoclimate indicators.

Periods with an increased frequency of extreme floods tend to coincide with cool, moist conditions and frequent El Niño events.

NOTE, however, contrast between 13th & 16th century drought periods in #’s of paleofloods

• extreme floods / paleofloods are intermittent

• cannot be archived as continuous annually resolved chronologies

• in some cases, can be interpreted in context of higher-resolution, continuous proxy chronologies

Verde River, AZ: paleoflood data vs. tree-ring based annual streamflow reconstruction

see House, Pearthree, and Klawon, 2002

1868 peak: corresponding

paleoflood

no corresponding peaks in streamflow reconstruction

Paleofloods of1862 & 1891:

Regional / global compilations of paleoflood data

When further explored and linked to the full spectrum of ocean-atmosphere teleconnections and modes of large-scale atmospheric circulation variability –-- may provide important insights on changes in precipitation intensity and the magnitude and frequency of large floods over past millennia.

Five Insightsfrom the Upper Tails of Flood Distributions

1. High frequencies of moderate floods and/or occasional extremely large floods can occur in regions undergoing drought.

• Peaks-above-base: 30+ gaging stations in Arizona

• Synoptic charts + precipitation data causal mechanisms

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

WATER YEAR

AV

G #

FL

OO

DS

AVERAGE # OF PARTIAL DURATION SERIES FLOODS in GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ EACH YEAR (per station)

FREQUENCY OF FLOOD PEAKS PER YEAR

Interannual Variability of # of Floods (1950-80)

--- 1950s ---

IMPLICATIONS

Systematic examinations of the gaged flood record in other regions undergoing drought are needed to explore the hydroclimatic conditions for concurrent flood and drought episodes.

2. Unusually large floods in drainage basins of all sizes are likely to be associated with circulation anomalies involving quasi-stationary patterns such as blocking ridges and cutoff lows in the middle-level flow.

Lane Canyon flash flood

Extreme flood events evolve from: • uncommon (or unseasonable) locations of typical circulation features

• unusual combinations of atmospheric processes,

• rare configurations in circulation patterns (e.g. extreme blocking)

• exceptional persistence of a specific circulation pattern.

Spring 1973 Mississippi River Basin floods

Jimmy Camp Creek flood of 1965

Record-breaking floods of winter 1992-93 in Arizona

IMPLICATIONS (1)

Since the characteristic drought circulation pattern in the United States is a strong middle- and upper-level ridge (and occasional blocking high) . . .

. . . it should not be surprising that extreme flooding and persistent drought occasionally coincide, at least in adjacent regions.

IMPLICATIONS (2)

Shifts in storm track locations and other anomalous circulation behavior are clearly linked to unusual flood and drought behavior .

They are likely to be the factors most directly responsible for projected increases in hydrologic extremes under a changing climate.

3. The interaction between storm properties and drainage basin properties plays an important role in the occurrence and magnitude of large floods both regionally and seasonally.

from Doswell et al. (1996)

-- Slow movement of system -- Large area of high rainfall rate along motion vector -- Both occurring together

Synergistic Combination of Factors

• Paleoflood information about precipitation extremes is highly basin-specific.

• Basin-specific interactions play much less of a role in the development and magnitude of a regional drought, which generally transcends the influence of drainage divides.

• Regional scale land-surface atmosphere feedbacks are more likely to influence the development and persistence of drought conditions.

IMPLICATIONS

4. Compilations of paleoflood records combined with gaged records suggest there is a natural, upper physical limit to the magnitude of floods in a given region.

Paleoflood evidence for a natural upper bound to flood magnitudes in the Colorado River Basin Enzel, Ely, House, Baker & Webb (1993) WRR

IMPLICATIONS• Paleoflood evidence points to an upper physical limit for intense rainfall events

• This raises important theoretical questions about whether such a limit might continue to hold under a projected warmer climate with a more intense hydrologic cycle.

5. The identification of hydroclimatically defined mixed distributions in flood records suggests that in regions where floods are produced by several types of meteorological events, different storm types may exhibit unique probability distributions.

Conceptual Framework for Flood Time Series

Time-varying means

Time-varying variances

Both

SOURCE: Hirschboeck, 1988

Mixed frequency distributions may arise from:

• storm types

• synoptic patterns

• ENSO, etc. teleconnections

• multi-decadal circulation regimes

Conceptual Framework transferred to Paleo-record “Time”

b) modified from Knox, 1983

a)

b)

A shift in circulation regime (or anomalous persistence of a given regime) will lead to different theoretical frequency / probability distributions over time

(Hirschboeck , 1988)

IMPLICATIONS

For floods or paleofloods, climatic changes can be conceptualized as time-varying atmospheric circulation regimes that generate a mix of shifting streamflow probability distributions over time.

This conceptual framework – -- in tandem with the framework proposed by Trenberth (1998,1999) – provides an opportunity to evaluate streamflow-based hydrologic extremes under a changing climate from complementary perspectives.

CLOSING COMMENT

• In the largest and most extreme floods studied, PERSISTENCE was always a factor

• Persistence of INGREDIENTS (e.g., deep moist convection environment) most important at small scales (flash floods)

• Persistence of PATTERN most important at larger scales (basin-wide / regional floods)

• Persistence bridges meteorological and climatological time scales

• Persistence = underlying factor in atmosphere / basin synergy . . .

AND DROUGHT!!!!

This Paleoflood Databank is a repository for paleoflood data that has been created for use by the paleoflood research community.

It was compiled by researchers at The Arizona Laboratory for Paleohydrological Analysis (ALPHA) and The Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, under the direction of K.K Hirschboeck with funding from NOAA Office of Global Programs and the US Bureau of Reclamation.

[This is Version 3.1. 2003]

Complete Relationships Diagram for the Data Fields in the Paleoflood Databank,

v. 3.1Basin Publication Contributo

r

EVENT

SiteRiver

Method of Dating the

Flood / Paleoflood

Methods of discharge or stage calculation:

Techniques usedto indicate

paleostage level:

Example of a QUERY: for a given date, e.g. 1983:

Example of a DATA

REPORT

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

(SOURCE: House & Hirschboeck, 1997)

Largest floods in Lower Colorado River Basin

Regionalization of Extreme

Events

Paleoflood

data

(SOURCE: Jarrett, 1991 from Patton & Baker, 1977)

Flood Frequency Analysis

from Stedinger et al. 1988Gaged record

(censored)

Historical peaks

Statistical Procedures based on combined data:

Systematic (Gaged), Historical & Paleoflood