feedback requirements for sase fels - cern · feedback requirements for sase fels 20 ipac 2010 ......

1 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

1Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Feedback Requirements for SASE FELS

Henrik Loos, SLACIPAC 2010, Kyoto, Japan

2 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

2Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Outline

Stability requirements for SASE FELsDiagnostics for beam parameters

Transverse: Beam position monitorsLongitudinal: Bunch length/compression/arrival monitors, synchrotron radiation monitors

Feedback implementationsLCLS transverse feedbackXFEL orbit IBFBLCLS longitudinal feedbackFLASH longitudinal IBFBs

Summary

3 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

3Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Ensure electron beam quality for lasingProvide stable photon beam for users

SASE FEL Feedback

InjectorInjector AccAcc UsersUsersUndulatorUndulatorBCBCBCBC AccAcc AccAcc

λ, Δt, ΔxE, φ E, φ E, φ100 MeV ~ GeV

Energy (GeV)

Wave length

Und. length

Bunch Charge

Peak Current

Gain length

Beam size

Rate (Hz)

13.6 1.5 Å 100m 0.25-1nC 3kA 3.5 m 30 μm 120

8 1 Å 100m 0.3nC 2.5kA ~10 m 35 μm 60

17.5 1 Å 130m 0.1-1nC 5kA 3.7 m 45 μm

10/ 5E6

4 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

4Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Transverse requirementsUndulator orbit for efficient SASELG ~ 3 – 10 m, λ ~ 1 Å→ x’ < 5 μrad over several LG

Beam position x < σ/10 for stable photon beamβ ~ 30 m, εn ~ 1 μm→ x < 5 μm

SASE FEL Feedback Requirements

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 1000

1

2

3

4

Undulator Beam Position X (μm)

FEL

Pul

se E

nerg

y (m

J)

LCLS example:Transverse jitter in undulator from leaked dispersion

Lasing rms widthat 6.7 GeVσ = 90 μm

G' Lx λ<

5 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

5Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Longitudinal requirementsSASE process: ρ parameter ~ 10-4

Photon BW ~ ρ → energy stability 10-4

Bunch compressor R56 ~ 4 cm→ timing jitter Δt ~ R56 ρ/c ~ 10s of fsEnergy measurement R16 ~ 10 cm → R16 ρ ~ 10 μmEnergy in BC from position measurement in BC or from TOF measurement with beam arrival monitors

Bandwidth requirementsNC accelerator ~100 Hz rate → Feedback stabilizes slow driftsSC accelerator bunch train MHz rate → Intra Bunch FB required

Feedback Requirements cont’d

6 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

6Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

LCLS Strip Line BPM Performance

Strip line BPMsContinuous calibration with test pulse between beam triggersBeam synchronous data acquisition system at 120 Hz

Noise level measurementMeasure beam orbits at ~150 BPMs for 500 shots in main linac through undulatorAverage value for strip-line 3.5 μm, for RF cavity 250 nm at 250 pC 0

2

4

6

Noi

se rm

s ( μ

m)

250 pC

Stripline BPMRF BPM

0 500 1000 15000

10

20

30

Position (m)

Noi

se rm

s ( μ

m)

20 pC

RF BPMσ = 300 nm

Strip Line BPMσ = 3 μm

RF BPMσ = 2 μm

Strip Line BPMσ = 25 μm

E. Medvedko et al., BIW 2008, TUPTPF037

7 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

7Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

LCLS Undulator RF Cavity BPMs

Few micron beam orbit straightness in undulator required for FEL operationSub-micron resolution met with RF cavity BPM design11.4 GHz dipole cavityReference cavity for normalizationCalibration with beam signals

Move supporting girder of undulatorInduce known orbit oscillation upstream of undulator

8 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

8Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

RF BPMs at XFEL/Spring-8

Dipole mode cavity at 4.76 GHz + monopole cavityShifted from main RF frequency to avoid dark currentMeasurements at SCSS test acceleratorPosition resolution < 200 nmTiming resolution from TM010 cavity < 25 fs

Timing resolutionPosition resolution

H. Maesaka et al., DIPAC09, MOPD07 See also H. Maesaka et al., MOPE003S. Matsubara et al., MOPE004

9 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

9Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

RF BPMs for X-FEL

Based on Spring-8 designFrequency 3.3 GHzLow Q to resolve bunch train at 5 MHz10 mm high precision version for undulator40 mm version for IBFBDesigned for 1 μm resolution

Test stand at FLASH 40 mm RF BPM for IBFBD. Noelle, BIW10, WECNB01

See also B. Keil et al., MOPE064

10 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

10Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

LCLS Transverse Feedback

Launch FB for each linac sectionLoops for transport line and undulatorFB are independent of each otherDecoupling by use of different time scalesFB response matrix from online model

L0L0

GUNGUN

L3L3L2L2XX

DL1 BC1 DL2L1L1

σσzz11

δδ11ϕϕ11 VV11

σσzz22

δδ22ϕϕ22 VV22

δδ33

VV33

δδ00VV00

BC2

BPMsBPMsCER detectorsCER detectors

Steering LoopSteering LoopLaserLaser

J. Wu et al., PAC 2009, WE5RFP046

11 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

11Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Undulator Feedback Performance

Upstream LTU FB runs at 10 HzUndulator FB slower with 1 HzHorizontal jitter 13 μm / 2 μrad30 – 40% largerthan vertical due to dispersion leakageResidual jitter ~ 25%of beam size -80

-40

0

40

Pos

ition

(μm

)

σx = 13 μm

0 50 100 150 200

-5

0

5

10

Time (s)

Ang

le (μr

ad)

σx' = 2 μrad

ActualCorrection

Beam at Undulator Entrance, 6 GeV

12 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

12Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

XFEL/PSI Intra-Bunch Orbit Feedback

Use downstream BPMs for feedback loopLatency ~ 1 μs bunch spacingFPGA for feedback calculationFast strip-line kicker for orbit correctionUse upstream BPMs for calibrationBPMs in undulator for slow feedback

B. Keil et al., EPAC08, THPC123

13 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

13Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

LCLS Bunch Length Monitor

Edge radiation from last dipole of each BCIntegrated measurement sensitive from mm to 20 μmBlock NIR radiation from bunching instability with filters3% rms noise from correlation with bunch length dependent wake field energy loss in undulator

Edge Radiation

Beam

Paraboloid

Beam Splitter

Mesh Filter

Pyro Detector

Edge Radiation

Beam

Paraboloid

Beam Splitter

Mesh Filter

Pyro Detector

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

1300

1400

1500

1600

1700

Wake Energy Loss (MeV)

BC

2 P

eak

Cur

rent

(A

)

<I> = 1507 A

σI = 50 A

14 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

14Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

LCLS BLM Calibration

Empirical fit of signal to (σz)-4/3

Use fit to calculate peak current

10 20 30 40 500

2

4

6

8

Bunch Length (μm)D

etec

tor S

igna

l (1

0 5 c

ts)

ee−−

σσzz

2.44 m2.44 m

ββdd ββss

ΔΔψψ ≈≈ 9090°°

VV((tt)) σσyy

RFRF‘‘streakstreak’’

SS--bandband

BPM provides only signal related to bunch lengthCalibration with absolute measurement from transverse deflecting cavity

15 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

15Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

LCLS Longitudinal Feedback

Cascaded FB at 5 Hz (Matlab implementation)Fixed energy gain in L2 & L3 klystronsChange global L2 phaseAdjust L2 & L3 energy with several klystrons at opposite phasesFeedback uses orthogonal actuators to separate energy gain and chirp of L2

L0L0

GUNGUN

L3L3L2L2XX

DL1 BC1 DL2L1L1

σσzz11

δδ11ϕϕ11 VV11

σσzz22

δδ22ϕϕ22 VV22

δδ33

VV33

δδ00VV00

BC2

BPMsBPMsCER detectorsCER detectors

Steering LoopSteering LoopLaserLaser

16 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

16Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Longitudinal Feedback Performance

7% peak current jitter6% X-ray pulse energy jitter (best 3%)Stability achieved over hrsFeedback controls enable bunch length & energy changes (few %) in 10s of seconds

Operation soon at 120 HzFast orbit and energy/phase feedback in developmentTime-slot aware control for different 60 Hz phases

-40

0

40

δE/E

(10

-4)

σδ = 11 x10-4

1250

1500

1750

I Pea

k (A

)

σI = 98 A

0 10 20 30 400

2

4

Time (s)

EΦ

(m

J)

σE = 0.25 mJ

Beam energy/peak current, 6 GeV

See also F.-J. Decker et al., TUPE071

17 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

17Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

LCLS Phase Cavities

PhaseCavity

AdjustableAttenuator

Mixer

¼ Divider

16 BitDigitizer

X6Multiplier

PhaseMeasurement

Software

2805 MHz

51 MHz

2856 MHz

476 MHzReference

119 MHz

Trigger

Jitter between two cavities 15 fsNot used for e-beam FBSignal used for offline analysis

J. Frisch et al., TUPE066

Synchronize laser of user experiment to electron beamJ. Byrd et al., MOOCRA03

See also J. Byrd et al., TUPEA033T. Ohshima et al., TUPEA030

18 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

18Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

FLASH Bunch Compression Monitor

Coherent diffraction radiation detectorRadiator is metal screen with slitOptical radiation transport with GHz to THz bandwidthSignal from pyroelectric detectorFast detection resolves bunch trainC. Behrens et al., MOPD090

19 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

19Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

FLASH Beam Arrival Monitor

Laser clock via length stabilized fiber with 6 fs stabilityBeam signal from 4 button pick-upsElectro-optic modulator encodes beam signal on laser amplitudeFast sampling with 108 MHz ADC

F. Loehl, TESLA-FEL2009-08

M. Bock et al., FEL09, WEPC66

Operate at zero-crossing of amplitude modulationDelivers arrival time of each bunch in bunch train with < 10 fs resolution

See also M. Bock et al., WEOCMH02

20 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

20Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Longitudinal Intra-bunch Feedback

FPGA based controller boardPID controller for amplitude correction from BAM signalPhase control from BCM signalRapid change at head of bunch train from beam loadingLatency of 30 μs due to SC RF

F. Loehl et al., EPAC08, THPC158

F. Loehl et al., FEL08, THBAU02

Phase feedback

Amplitude feedback

21 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

21Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

FLASH Synchrotron Radiation Monitor

Energy measurement with < 10-4 resolutionICCD for energy spread of single bunchesFast centroid readout with multi-anode PMT14-bit ADC at 1 MHz for bunch train resolution

A. Wilhelm et al., DIPAC09, TUPD43

C. Gerth et al., DIPAC09, TUPD22

SRM signal resolution

22 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

22Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Effect of beam loading at head of bunch train minimized after a few iterations of the FF algorithm

FLASH Energy Feedback using SRM

Correct stochastic and deterministic disturbances with a learning FF algorithm

C. Gerth et al., DIPAC09, TUPD22

23 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

23Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Summary

Diagnostics available to meet resolution requirements for SASE FELsSASE FEL feedback systems achieve beam stability to do user experiments over many hoursOptical synchronization schemes enable < 10 fs timing measurements and synchronization of user experimentsEnergy stability of ~ 10-3 still exceeds photon beam bandwidth

24 Henrik Loosloos@slac.stanford.edu

24Feedback Requirements for SASE FELsIPAC 2010

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the people working on X-ray laser facilities worldwide and to my colleagues from the LCLS commissioning team to make stable X-ray beams a reality