february 14, 2013 26th annual management information systems [mis] conference effective teaching –...

February 14, 2013

26th Annual Management Information Systems [MIS]

Conference

Effective Teaching – A NH Model for

Educator Evaluations

Irene KoffinkMichael Schwartz

“Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement.” 2

Agenda – February, 2013

1. Managing and performing evaluation2. Collecting outcome indicators3. A Network Strategy will help provide support4. Demonstration

Presenters

Irene Koffink, SLDS ManagerMike Schwartz, NH DOE ConsultantDean Hupp, Hupp Technologies

Evaluation of Effective Educators: Tools that Can Help

We are building a system to manage and perform Evaluations: Guiding Principles…

• Seek LEA input throughout the process• Build upon existing Educator Information System (EIS)• Operationalize State-wide Model• Enable LEA Flexibility• Provide for a link between evaluations and

professional development• Ensure secure access to protect privacy• Verify privacy of data to ensure LEA ownership

3

Add an Option

“Eva

luations”

Evaluation Status

Teacher

Eval Due Date

Classroom Observation

Student Survey

Peer Feedback

………….

EvaluationRubric Comments

Ms. abc 4/1/14 s c ip 3-4/3/3/1/3 Great job at….

Mr. xyz 4/1/14 s ns c

Miss. def 4/1/15 S na Ip

A secure ‘home page’ will display the evaluator’s educators and the status of their evaluations!! You can ‘drill down’ on any component to see the ‘evidence’ or rubric details.

4

Legend:s = started; c = complete; ip = inProcess; na = notApplicable; ns = notStarted3-4/3/3/1/3 (overall score, followed by individual component scores).

Evaluation SummaryEducator: xyz

Domains

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Weight PD

Comments

Learners and Learning x aa% x

Content x bb%

Learning, Facilitation, Instruction

x cc% x

Professional Responsibility

x dd%

Student Outcomes x ee%

Totals x 100%

The ‘Evaluation Summary’ will show you the overall state required ratings! You can ‘drill down’ on any x to see customized rubrics and evidence behind these ratings.

5

View: Learners and Learning Domain (could view all)

Educator: xyz

Domain Strands (customizable)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Comments

Learner Development x

Learning Differences x

Learning Environment x

You can define a rubric based upon models such as Charlotte Danielson, you can design your own, or simply use the state rubric based upon state rules.

6

Hover Text:a. An understanding of how learners develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the personal, physical, social, and academic dimensions; and

b. The ability to facilitate developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences based on the unique needs of each learner.

Individual PD Goals and PD Plans

Educator: xyz

Goal:

ProfessionalLearning Activity:

Throughout the evaluation process you can jump to Goals and PD Plans if your district chooses to capture these in EIS.

7Goal Learning Activity Status

Add/Edit

Classroom ObservationEducator: xyz

Date:

Feedback:

You can define screens to capture evidence. In this case the district has configured EIS to capture Classroom Observations. On all screens you can email, print or export the page.

Next Step:

8

Peer FeedbackEducator: xyz

Date:

Feedback:

Load Image:

An example of a page to capture Peer Evaluation information.

9

Name ????Peer:

Misc. Input DocumentEducator: xyz

Date:

Comment:

Load Image:

You can customize the evidence to capture what is appropriate for your district.

10

We have begun the development effort!

11

Demo – in just one minute (or two).

But first…

12

PerformancePLUS provides access to multiple measures and enables collection of evidence that can be used in evaluations. (Student names are fictitious)

In addition to an evaluation tool, we want to helpLEAs gather meaningful measurements

Existing reports allow evaluators to look at NECAP growth – to consider ‘shared attributes’ or student outcomes for a given teacher. (Student names are fictitious)

13

LEAs can also consider student performance changes from year to year.

14

15

We are building state model evaluation indicators into our system.

Moving Forward

• Best practice surveys (e.g., student survey, climate survey, parent survey, peer survey).

• Summary reports (e.g., growth at the school level or multiple teachers at once).

• NWEA and SAT growth factors.

• And we are providing support and training to schools.

16

We have launched a social network for Educator Effectiveness.

17

Users can share knowledge, receive on-line training and contribute to the community themselves.

Now for the Demo! A tool to manage the evaluation process.

18

Demo

19

Questions!!

PLEASE CONTACT US WITH QUESTIONS: Irene Koffink – Irene.koffink@doe.nh.gov

Michael Schwartz – Michael.Schwartz@doe.nh.gov

Dean Hupp – dhupp@huppinfotech.com