faculty.fuqua.duke.edu

Post on 01-Sep-2014

1.586 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

LTCM’s Analysis of Risk Management

February 28, 2002

Frank BurkeLarry KisskoGurkan SalkHeather King

LTCM Risk Management

Agenda

1. LTCM Background 2. Swap Spread Trading Strategy 3. Project Analysis

Comparison/measurement of LTCM’s Risk Assessment Discussion on return and spread distribution, calculated

implied std deviation Estimate of LTCM’s Value-At-Risk Proxy Tests

4. Take-aways

LTCM Risk Management

LTCM Background

August 21, 1998, fund lost $550m mostly from swaps spreads and equity volatility bets. LTCM believed this event would occur 1 in every 800

trillion years (or an 8.3 std dev move). Swap spreads shot up from 60 bps to 80 bps intraday vs. an

average daily move of 2 bps LTCM’s swap position represented 2.4% of global

swap market in December 1997 Leverage ratios varied from 28:1 to a high of 55:1 in

late 1998

LTCM Risk Management

LTCM Trading Strategy

We focused on of one of LTCM’s biggest trades: Swap Spread Relative Value Trade

Swap spread – difference between the fixed rate on a fixed-for-floating swap and the yield on a coupon-bearing Treasury bond of comparable maturity

Speculative strategy that spread would converge to its historical mean

Long swap/short the treasuries (in 1998) Crisis: Aug 21, spreads spiked 21 bps intra-day

LTCM Risk Management

Swap Spread Frequency: “the bet”Frequency through 7/31/98

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96Swap Spread

Freq

uenc

y

August 20, 88 August 21, 88

Upper 95%

LTCM Risk Management

Project Analysis

Parametric VAR – assumes normal distribution Historical VAR – based on actual data distribution Proxy search – difficult to find a strong correlation

BAA- 10 year treasury AAA- 10 year treasury MBS - 10 year treasury

Forecasted daily variance

Value At Risk – defined as the expected maximum loss over a target horizon within a given confidence interval

LTCM Risk Management

Swap Returns Distribution (thru 7/98)Frequency of Spread Returns through 7/31/98

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

-9.09% -6.71% -4.32% -1.93% 0.45% 2.84% 5.22% 7.61% 9.99% 12.38%Spread % Return

Upper 99.85% based on Normal

Distribution

Upper 99.85% based on actual

distribution

LTCM Risk Management

Analytic Results

Risk analysis LTCM Satchmo

Return distribution

Normal Curve Non-normal: w/Kurtosis & fat tails

99.7% confidence interval

[- 6.07%, + 6.10%] from the mean return 0.01%

[- 10.32%, +10.39%] from the mean return 0.01%

Implied Daily Std. deviation

2.03% 3.46%

Value at Risk (VAR) - estimated $60M $95.2M

Probability of Aug 21 event

10-13

Or .00000000001%.16% = 4 observations

over 10 year period

LTCM Risk Management

Value at Risk (VAR)

Principal measure of risk at LTCM LTCM parametric VAR measure

Capital (assume $1b) x daily std dev of returns (.02) x std dev of required confidence interval (3 = 99.85% 1-tail)

$1.0b x 2% x 3 = $60,000,000 Our historical VAR measure

$ 1.0b x 9.5238% = $95,238,000

LTCM Risk Management

Take-Away Thoughts

VAR not necessarily suspect – correct inputs are critical

Cannot blindly apply normal distribution Dig into your data If data is not complete consider:

Developing a risk proxy Assuming fatter tails in distribution (Student’s T curve)

LTCM Risk Management

Appendix - chartsChange in Spreads

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

11/1

/88

5/1/

89

11/1

/89

5/1/

90

11/1

/90

5/1/

91

11/1

/91

5/1/

92

11/1

/92

5/1/

93

11/1

/93

5/1/

94

11/1

/94

5/1/

95

11/1

/95

5/1/

96

11/1

/96

5/1/

97

11/1

/97

5/1/

98

11/1

/98

5/1/

99

11/1

/99

5/1/

00

11/1

/00

5/1/

01

11/1

/01

Spre

ad (i

n bp

s)

Swap Spreads Baa/Treasury Spreads Aaa/Treasury Spreads

August 21, 2002

LTCM Risk Management

Appendix - chartsFrequency through 2/20/2002

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Swap Spreads

LTCM Risk Management

Appendix - chartsFrequency 7/31/98 - 2/20/02

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

58 64 70 76 82 88 94 100 106 112 118 124 130 136

Swap Spread

LTCM Risk Management

Appendix - chartsFrequency Of Spread Return through 2-20-02

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

% Price change

LTCM Risk Management

Appendix - chartsFrequency of Spread Returns after 7/31/98

0

50

100

150

200

-10.77% -8.35% -5.93% -3.51% -1.09% 1.33% 3.75% 6.17% 8.59% 11.01%

Spread Change

LTCM Risk Management

References

Jorion, P., 2000 Risk Management Lessons from LTCM Kolman, Joe, 1999, “LTCM Speaks”, Derivatives Strategy (April) p.12-

17 Lewis, Michael, 1999, “How the Egg-Heads Cracked” New York Times

Magazine, January 24, p 24-77 Anonymous, 1998, “Too Clever By Half”, The Economist Magazine,

November 14 Whaley, Robert, 2001, “Derivatives” Class Presentation Scholes, Myron, 2000, “Crisis and Risk Management- The Near Crash of

1998”, AEA Papers and Proceedings Vol 90 No. 2, May. Bloomberg – Swap spread data

top related