ewec 2007 centre for renewable energy sources wind turbine testing laboratory wt load measurements:...

Centre for Renewable Energy Sources

Wind Turbine Testing Laboratory EWEC 2007

WT Load Measurements: A Comparison between Load-Based and Analytical Calibration

D. J. Lekou, F. Mouzakis

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 2

Load Measurements

Tower (Bending & Torsion) Main Shaft (Bending & Torsion) Blades (Bending) Supporting Systems

Hydraulic pistons Coupling axles Bearing plates

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 3

Recommended Sensors

Bending Moments Tower – type T Bending Moments Shaft – type II Torsion – type V Axial Loads – type T

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 4

Load-based Calibration

Apply load Determine influence coefficient

i0iii VVAF

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 5

Analytical Calibration

Electrical calibration Knowledge of material & geometry Definition of influence coefficient

i0iii VVCB

EwF

Load Type B

Bending (tower) T 2(1+ν)

Bending (shaft) II 4

Torsion V 4

Axial T 2(1+ ν)

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 6

Calibration uncertainty

Measured quantity: yNormal (measured value, standard uncertainty)

Type A: analysis of repeated measurementsType B: based on scientific judgment

1N

1j

N

1jkkjxx

kj

N

1j

2x

2

j

2c x,xruu

x

f

x

f2u

x

fyu

kjj

N21 x,...,x,xfy

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 7

Load-based Calibration Uncertainty

LoadMagnitude of loadLoad direction & Load introduction point

SensorsLocation of sensors

Data Acquisition System Other parameters

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 8

Analytical Calibration Uncertainty

Material propertiesE-modulus, Poisson Ratio

Geometrical DataDiameter, Thickness

SensorsLocation, orientation

Data Acquisition SystemGauge factor, Resistor, etc.

Other parameters

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 9

Tension of Plate – Load based

Load Magnitude±0.2% full scale

Load direction±1°

Data Acquisition SystemuV = 2.89mV

AVF

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 10

Tension of Plate - Analytical

CV12

bhEF

Electrical calibration (C)S.g. factorS.g. calibratorType A (linear regression)Data Acquisition System

S.g. misalignment (neglected)

Material PropertiesE-modulusPoisson Ratio

Geometrical dataWidthThickness

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 11

Tension of Plate - Results

Influence Coefficient & uncertainty

Load-based AnalyticalAL (kN/V) uAL/AL (%) AA (kN/V) uAA/AA (%)

11.53 0.34 11.66 3.00

12.09 0.36 11.94 3.00

11.81 0.36 11.69 3.00

12.18 0.31 12.02 3.00

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 12

Tension of Plate - Sensitivity

Influence of material properties on coefficientE-modulusPoisson ratio

NOMINAL Variation E Variation ν

AL*

AA*

E=205, ν=0.29

AA

(E=210)

AA

(E=200)

AA

(ν=0.28)

AA

(ν=0.30)

11.90 12.04 12.34 11.75 12.12 11.9312.34 11.75 12.12 11.93

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 13

Wind Turbine Tower – Load based

Bending momentApplied loadDistance measurementLoad Direction

Indication of s.g. bridge output

Nacelle positionPrevailing wind

AVF

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 14

Wind Turbine Tower - Analytical

Electrical Calibration (C)Material propertiesGeometrical PropertiesData Acquisition system

Strain gauge misalignment (neglected)Strain gauge positioning (neglected)

CV8

hD

12

EF

2

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 15

Wind Turbine Tower - Results

Load calibration2.25%

Analytical calibration3.56%

Target (IEC) uncertainty3%

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 16

Wind Turbine Main Shaft

Similar approach to previousLoad calibration

Blade position

Analytical calibrationOnly E-modulus

CV

D

2

64

dDE

4

1F

44

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 17

Wind Turbine Main Shaft - Results

Load based calibration 1.26%

Analytical calibration 3.15%

Target (IEC) uncertainty3%

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 18

Conclusions - Recommendations

Both methods have limitationsLoad calibration needs high loadsLoad calibration not always feasibleAnalytical calibration results to higher uncertainties

Combination of methods preferred

European Wind Energy Conference 2007, Milan, Italy 19

Thank you for your attention