evolution, education and evaluation: tree-thinking in intro biology phil gibson ou tsi october 20,...
Post on 13-Jan-2016
222 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Evolution, Education and Evaluation: Tree-thinking inIntro Biology
Phil Gibson
OU TSI October 20, 2011
Miller, J.D., E.C. Scott, and S. Okamato. 2006. Public Acceptance of Evolution. Science. 313: 765-766.
The Basic Ideas of Tree-thinking
“Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." Theodosius Dobzhansky (1973)
“Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of phylogeny.” (Society of Systematic Biologists 2001).
“Nothing makes sense in phylogeny except in the light of DNA.” (Kalinowski et al. 2010)
Tree-Thinking
Tree-Thinking
• Question #1: What is the relationship between ability to read phylogenetic trees relate and acceptance of evolution?
• Question #2: How does student understanding of natural selection and genetics relate to understanding and acceptance of evolution?
• Question #3: Will a tree-thinking based curriculum using active learning modules improve student understanding and acceptance of evolution and evolutionary theory?
What we want to know
BIOL 1134 Evolution, Ecology, & Diversity
1. Encourage understanding and appreciation for major, modern biological thought and theories:
– Unity and diversity of life (DNA and genetic variation)– History of life (evolution and phylogeny)– Relationship between structure and function (adaptation)– Focus on life at the individual, population, community,
and ecosystem levels (hierarchical organization, interdependence)
2. Develop student skills, understanding, and appreciation for the nature of science.
– Thinking, reasoning, and problem-solving in biology. – Prediction and hypothesis testing in science. – Data collection, analysis, and interpretation– Group collaboration and interactions.
DNA & GeneticsDNA & Genetics
Inheritance & Pedigrees
Inheritance & Pedigrees
EvolutionConcepts & Mechanisms
EvolutionConcepts & Mechanisms
PhylogeneticsRead & Construct
Trees
PhylogeneticsRead & Construct
Trees
Application(Biodiversity
surveys, adaptations,
speciation etc.)
Application(Biodiversity
surveys, adaptations,
speciation etc.)
Tree-thinking Curriculum Structure
Components of the curriculum.
• Genetic basis of phylogeny & tree thinking: genetics, inheritance, and population genetics
• Principles of tree-thinking: how-to of phylogeny construction and interpretation
• Application of tree-thinking: opportunities to collect and analyze data, processes of hypothesis development and testing
• Modules: Case study, group inquiry, active learning
Pedigree Analysis & Genetics
Phylogeny of Domestic Dog Breeds – Result of Artificial
Selection
Platypus Reproduction & Mammalian Evolution
Pollination and Floral Evolution
A Deadly Passion: Evolution of Sexual Cannibalism
Australian redback spider
Praying mantis Scorpion
Assessment & Evaluation
• Measure of the Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE): 20 question Likert-scale survey (Rutledge & Sadler 2007)
• Tree-thinking Challenge, Understanding Phylogenetic Trees, Tree Thinking Concept Inventory Variety of questions to read and construct phylogenetic trees. (Baum et al. 2005, Meir et al. 2007, Neagle 2009)
• Concept Inventory of Natural Selection, Genetics Concept Assessment (Anderson & Fisher 2002, Smith et al. 2008)
MATE pre-post Comparison
Tree Reading Assessments
MATE & TTCI Spring 2011
MATE, Natural Selection & Genetics
Normalized Learning Gain
Deeper Analysis & the Education Literature
• The education literature is rich with techniques for further analysis
• Item Analysis, Discrimination Index calculations, Cronbach’s α provide further insights that basic statistics don’t reveal.
• Further analysis of specific questions and answers.
What we’ve learned so far. . .
• Tree-thinking curriculum appears to increase understanding and acceptance of evolutionary theory.
• Acceptance of evolution is related to tree-thinking ability knowledge of natural selection, and knowledge of genetics.
• Better assessments are needed.• There’s more work to do!
Acknowledgements
• National Science Foundation – DUE #0940835
• The University of Oklahoma – College of Arts and Sciences,
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Department of Zoology
• J. Cooper, M. Jones, S. Rhodes, A. Makowicz, C. Poindexter, M. Gibson, D. Washecheck
All research conducted under OU IRB# 12682
top related