engaging young people as researchers
Post on 02-Feb-2016
32 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Carol McNaughton Nicholls (Natcen) Louca-Mai Brady (NCB)Dillon Denton-Ashley
Chair: Naomi Jones (NatCen)
Engaging young people as researchers
Who we areLouca-Mai Brady, Senior Research Officer,
NCB Research CentreNCB is the leading support and development
charity for children, young people and familiesThe NCB Research Centre has a varied
programme of high quality research across NCB’s areas of interest
In both NCB and the Research Centre promoting and supporting children and young people’s participation is a key aspect of our work
Who we areDr Carol McNaughton Nicholls, Research
Director, Qualitative Research Unit, NatCenNaomi Jones, Research Director, Qualitative
Research Unit, NatCenNatCen -Leading independent social research
institute. Our work covers all areas of social policy and our
aim is a society better informed through quality research.
Large scale surveys, quantitative and qualitative research, often for central government.
Who you are…Why you were interested in attendingAny experience of engaging young
people in research?Current or forthcoming projects
Outline of sessionDefinitions, benefits and principles of
involvement Practical example from perspective of YP
organisation Challenges of involvement – ideal, reality
and pragmatismPractical example from perspective of
research organisation Conclusion – checklist for involvement
Drivers behind engagement of young people
Consultation is the process by which children and young people are asked their opinions – on a specific issue or broader agenda (eg as research participants)
Involvement/participation is the process by which individuals and groups of individuals can influence decision-making and bring about change (eg through involvement in the planning and process of research)
Different rolesParticipant
Young advisor
Young researcher
Young people/peer-led
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC)
Article 12 . Every child and young person has the right to express his or her views freely in all matters affecting them
Article 13. Every child and young person has the right to freedom of expression, including the right to all kinds of information and ideas.
Theoretical perspectivesInvolving those on whom research focuses on
can have a positive impact on what is researched, how research is conducted and the impact of research findings (Staley, 2009)
Shift from seeing CYP as subjects of research/ objects of enquiry towards a view of CYP as social actors with right to active participation (eg Grieg et al, 2007; Prout, 2002)
Increasing acknowledgement of their competence to do so and the power of the ‘child voice’ in research (eg Alderson, 2001; Powell & Smith, 2009).
Why is involvement important?Impacts on research:
shaping research agendas to reflect those with greatest relevance;
honing research designs, including ethical considerations and the appropriateness of language used;
encouraging validation in the analytical process; and,
when involved in dissemination, promotes trust in the research findings among the wider community.
(Staley, 2009)
Benefits for researchResearch topics and questions that are relevant to CYP’s livesAppropriate and accessible research methods and toolsInvolving young researchers can change the nature of data
collectedIncreasing impact of researchDeveloping understanding and bridging gaps between adults and
CYP
Benefits for children and young peopleChance to be actively involved in issues that affect them
Gaining recognition for their contribution
Skills and experience
Personal development
Model of involvement in researchConsultation (focus groups or one-off meetings
at key stages of the research – eg to seek views on a research proposal)
Collaboration (active, on-going participation – eg reference or advisory groups; young researchers working alongside adults on elements of a study)
Young people-led (locus of power is with young people for some, or all, key elements of a study)
Ladder of participation
The NCB Research Centre model
Based on Kirby et al. Building a Culture of Participation (2003)
Questions and discussion What do you see as the benefits?
For you/ the research For young people Methodological Epistemological Ethics and rights?
Views on the model presented
Practical example of CYP’s
involvement – the PEAR group
: our voices, our health A Wellcome Trust-funded project
supporting 20 young people to contribute to UK public health research and policy
Pilot project 11/2005 – 02/2008
Current project – 10/2008 – 11/2010
20 young people - meet in school holidays
works to:
Help young people to learn about, inform and influence public health research and policy
Develop links between young people and public health researchers and policy makers
Produce and distributing information about public health issues and research to young people
Demonstrates the impact of young people’s involvement in public health research, and how this can be applied to policy and practice
activity includes:Work with public health researchers,
policymakers and research bodies (eg PHRC, NICE, INVOLVE)
Website (www.ncb.org.uk/PEAR)Research summaries Conference (London, 27 Oct 2010)Speaking at events and conferencesResponding to consultationsCommissioning own research project
Benefits – PEAR members’ views:Opportunities to learn about public health,
gain research skills and have something to put on our CVs
Having our voices heard by researchers and policymakers
Helping to make research and policy more relevant to young people
Letting other young people know about public health issues that affect them
“We’ve been able to work with researchers and give
our opinions. There’s a mutual benefit, we’ve helped them and also gained knowledge ourselves”
“There’s lots of research about young people and public health – we deserve to have our voices heard”
“It’s important that we’re involved [in projects like PEAR] as then our opinions are heard not assumed”
“It’s important that we’re involved [in projects like PEAR] so that we can have an effect on young people’s public health policies”
Other NCB involvement projects Developing the participation of disabled children and
young people (2010-13) Involving Children in the Medicines for Children Research
Network (2005 – on-going) Evaluation of Youth4U - Young Inspectors (2009 – 2011) Centre for Excellence and Outcomes (C4EO) young
people-led research on impact of discrimination on educational attainment (2009)
Young Researcher Network – young people-led research on ‘Media Portrayal of Young People: impact and influences’ (2008)
National Review of CAMHS services (2008) What Makes the Difference? Peer research with care-
experienced young researchers(2007)
Questions on the PEAR project?
Challenges of involvement
Questions and discussion What do you see as the challenges?
For you/ research For young people Methodological Epistemological Ethics and rights?
When and why might you not involve young people in research?
AvailabilityAge and accrualInformed consent and the role of gatekeepersSafeguarding and child protection vs rights to
participateDiversity and inclusive practiceResource implicationsLack of experiencePower issuesBalancing young people’s & researchers’
expectationsQuality and ethicsScepticism from researchers and research bodiesNot always meaningful, possible or appropriate?
Reality and the ideal:
a pragmatic middle ground?
Ideal Reality Duration of project
Significant control over decision making
Training and support
Unique standpoint privileged
P
R
A
G
M
A
T
I
S
M
Project set up and recruitment required before involvement Policy/funder objectives to meetResource intensive – recruitment, training, support, admin High level of commitment asked for from peers, level of recompense? Lack of evidence regarding impact (Carr, 2004)
Practical example of YP involvement:
Formative evaluation of v
V evaluation and peer researchers
•Pragmatic approach to peer research involvement • V – youth volunteering agency
V evaluation • Formative • Two and a half years • Mixed methods – strands include survey of grant recipients, omnibus survey, review of marketing, CBA, qualitative case studies, discourse analysis, analysis of monitoring data• Consortium • Involvement of young people central to v – desire to involve in evaluation
V peer researchers
Who are peer researchers: • Decision ‘peer’ – 16 – 25 with experience of volunteering
• Recruited to reflect diversity/competency/interest
• 12 peer researchers recruited at the end of 2009
• Residential Training weekend January 2010
What are they working on: Qualitative case studies• In depth case studies began March 2010
•Design of topic guides & fieldwork strategies for case studies February 2010
• In depth case study visits underway (lead sections of interviews etc)
Preparing for involvement:
Purpose of involvement:• Accountability• Quality• Learning
Parameters of involvement• clarity of role and responsibilities - job spec• focus on in depth case studies data collection encounters with young people• constraints when designing & conducting social research
Design of recruitment strategy
Designing Training
Training:
Principles underpinning training:• Not making assumptions about ability levels• Making involvement as accessible as possible• Thinking flexibly & creatively about how best to offer support
Training sessions:• Overview of Evaluation:• Introduction to Qualitative Research and QRU• Introduction to Qualitative Data Collection• Introduction to research ethics
•Training delivery:Formal taught sessions•Group exercises – designing case studies.•Facilitation by external expert
Support:
•Assigning a peer researcher coordinator; payments and invoices; setting up processes and developing guidelines; maintaining general contact
•Ensuring that the way we work with peer researchers meet existing organisational procedures
•Data Security•Ethics/ Disclosure
•Communication •Monthly newsletter•Mentor•Facebook •Training – regular sessions
Mentor:
•Facilitate peer researchers involvement by acting as the main point of contact
•Monitor the time spent on tasks and the quality of work meets expectations
•Establish a professional but supportive relationship with peer researchers
•To assist and facilitate skills development
Challenges Young person – researcher identity is on a
continuum and changes over time Support and training v normalisation Availability Fieldwork skillsStaff resources Research aims and design already set Inherently hierarchical manner of working
A view from a young person Why involved Always been interested in society and social
work Had previous interest in solving problems as a
volunteer (volunteered for Turning Point and Media company working in the community)
Why is it important Relate to young people Understand them – read between the lines More trusting towards other young people Young people trust the research findings more
A view from a young person Challenges Time My challenges – finances, cannot be paid due
to benefits College and priorities Lots to understand – will I make a fool of
myself? Nerves Tips on how to involve young peopleLook at the background, if they cannot give
them money try to give them something else.
A view from a young person What do I want to gain from it: Experience
Benefits of involvement:
Honing research designs, including ethical considerations and the appropriateness of language used.
Shaping research agendas to reflect those with greatest relevance.
Encouraging validation in the analytical process. ?
Involved in dissemination, promotes trust in the research findings among the wider community.
?
Access to population and trust in the research
Capacity builds within organisation;
Engages with wider community
Questions on the V evaluation?
Conclusion: Checklist for involvement
•Benefits to research as well as those involved•Planned from the outset•Recruitment – how, where, who and for how long•CYP involved in deciding if, when and how they want to be involved – and given all the information they need to do so•Informing parents or carers if under 16/18•On-going training and support•Involvement in as many stages of research as possible•Involvement is accessible and relevant to those involved•Agree clearly defined roles•Genuine opportunities for meaningful decision-making•Reward and recognition (and challenges re: benefits)•Safe working procedures and ethics•Staff resources •Evaluation and feedback•Exit Strategy
Discussion and questions
why engage young people as researchers?
why not engage young people as researchers?
how could or should this apply to your own research?
what are the implications for ESRC and other research funders?
Further information www.ncb.org.uk/research www.ncb.org.uk/PEAR www.natcen.ac.uk www.invo.org.uk (INVOLVE – guides on payment,
involving CYP and other information including recent report on impact)
Participation Works: http://www.participationworks.org.uk/home
Children’s Rights Alliance for England: http://www.crae.org.uk/rights.html
National Youth Agency: http://www.nya.org.uk/integrated-youth-support-services/young-researcher-network
References Alderson, P. (2001) ‘Research by Children’. International Journal of Social
Research Methodology, vol 4, no 2, pp 139-153. Greig, A., Taylor, J. and MacKay, T. (2007) Doing Research with Children.
London: Sage Kellett, M. (2005). How to Develop Children as Researchers. London:
Paul Chapman Kirby, P., Lanyon, C., Cronin, K. and Sinclair, R. (2003) Building a Culture
of Participation: involving children and young people in policy, service planning, delivery and evaluation. London: DfES.
Kirby, P. (2003) A Guide to Actively Involving Young People in Research, for researchers, research commissioners and managers. Eastleigh: INVOLVE.
Powell, M.A. and Smith, A.B. (2009) ‘Children’s Participation Rights in Research’. Childhood, vol 16, pp 124-142.
Prout, A. (2002) ‘Researching children as social actors: an introduction to the Children 5-16 programme’. Children and Society, vol 16, no 2, pp67-76.
Staley, K. (2009) Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, Hampshire: INVOLVE
top related