electricity consumption power-house report presentation -danielle jacobs -callum bugler -salaama...

Post on 28-Dec-2015

214 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Electricity ConsumptionPower-HouseReportPresentation

-Danielle Jacobs-Callum Bugler-Salaama Maneveld-Clive Mncwabe-Sam Skosana

• Data collection

• Current system is tedious and ineffective and not managed effectively.

• Delays are caused because the collection of data is not collected in a standardised format

• Often the data is incorrect and/or incomplete

• Powerstar has proven to be problematic.

Situation of Concern

• Reduce UCT’s expenditure on electricity

• Through better data recording, there is an opportunity for improved managerial decisions to be made going forward.

• By lowering electricity usage the university is reducing the core contributor to its carbon footprint.

Business Opportunities

• Await results regarding refitted environmentally friendly equipment as well as add further environmentally additions to the campus

• Use the IS department and the class of INF3011F to address the problem at hand.

• Hire external, private sector help.

Analysis of Options/Alternative Solutions

• Improve the current data collection method

• Calculate UCT’s carbon footprint caused by the scope 2 indirect upstream activity

• Report fact-based conclusions on findings which are comprehensible and contextual regarding our project.

Project Objectives

Data Collection

Data Data format Data Holder Comments

Main Campus, Satellite Residences, Med Campus and Hiddingh Campus

Excel sheet Yusef Davids andShane Pontes

Properties and Services Utilities data used for electricity billing; monthly breakdown.

GSB Excel sheet Charlene Paris Figures were given in an excel spreadsheet.

Off Campus Website to Excel sheet PowerStar Data was transcribed from the website.

UCT Population Excel sheet Registrar’s Office

This is the total of students registered at UCT for 2014 (31254) and the staff was estimated to 5000.

Emission Factor Excel sheet Sandra Rippon

IS department chose the emission factor based on the GHG protocols recommended for 2014.

UCT Per Campus Carbon Emissions for 2014

65%

14%

5%

16%

0% 1%

Main Campus

Medical Campus

GSB

Satellite Residences

Hiddingh

Off Campus

UCT Per Campus Monthly Electricity Consumption for 2014

January

February

March

AprilMay

JuneJuly

August

Septem

ber

October

November

Decem

ber0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

4000000

4500000

Main CampusMedical CampusGSBSatellite ResidencesHiddinghOff Campus

KWh

UCT Per Campus Electricity Consumption Comparison for 2013 and 2014

Main Cam

pus

Medica

l Cam

pusGSB

Satel

lite Resi

dence

s

Hiddingh

Off Campus

0.00

5,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

25,000,000.00

30,000,000.00

35,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

45,000,000.00

50,000,000.00

20132014KW

h

• Emission Factor

• Data conversion to CO2 equivalents

• Comparison of Results

Carbon Footprint Calculation

Units 2013 2014

Tons CO2-eq 71 734 879.40 68 287 772.03

• Missing buildings on Power star(they are grouped)

• Some medical school meters not accounted for.

• Loadshedding late in the year

• Software malfunction

• Human error

Data Anomalies

• Occupancy Sensors

• Solar Heating in Residences

• Shutting Off Computers After Inactivity

• Power Down Challenge

• Electricity Week

Recommendations

Sustainable Data Collection Recommendations

• Implement an improved automated system that records energy consumption more efficiently and accurately.

• Standardize data capture templates across all campuses.

• Apply built-in conditional formatting and interactive graphs to Excel templates to highlight input errors.

Data Capture Template

Per Campus Data Capture Template

Infographic

• Incorrect data

• Delay in receiving accurate data

• Time slot which suits everyone

• Load shedding

• New power star data holder/controller

• Error on billing data

 Challenges

• 3 month time frame

• Power-Star Anomalies

• Two source of data

• Building meters

Limitations

• Main group issue was communication.

• Used effective techniques which include:– Serious Creativity– Prpic’s model of reflective practice

Reflection

Questions?

top related