effectiveness of ifmis in public sector kenya...

Post on 09-Mar-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

EFFECTIVENESS OF IFMIS IN PUBLIC SECTOR –KENYA CASE

Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 1

Agenda

• Mandate of the Auditor-General

• IFMIS (Definition)

• IFMIS Re-engineering

• IFMIS Re-engineered Components

• IFMIS Modules

• IFMIS Benefits

• Key IFMIS Implementation Steps

• IFMIS Implementation Challenges

• Integration of IFMIS with other third party systems

• IFMIS System Audit Process

• IFMIS Effectiveness Audit

• IFMIS Kenya Challenges

• Proposed Ideal Situation

Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector

Mandate of the Auditor-General

• The mandate of the Auditor General was expanded by the Constitution of Kenya (COK) 2010 to respond to two levels of government; notably National and County Governments.

• The mandate is to essentially audit all Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) at National and County levels. It also includes;

– Funds and Authorities;

– Courts;

– Constitutional Commissions and Independent Offices;

– Assemblies (National & County) & the Senate;

– Political Parties – Funded by Public Funds;

– Public Debt;

– Any other entity stipulated under the legislation; and

– Any entity funded from public funds including state corporations.

31 July, 2016Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 3

IFMIS Defined

• What is IFMIS?– Integrated Financial Management Information

System.

– It is an automated system that is used for public financial management.

• IFMIS in Kenya – The Integrated Financial Management and

Information System (IFMIS) system was first launched in 2003 in Kenya.

– This however introduced only limited modules, with other financial management processes remaining manual.31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 4

IFMIS Re-engineering

• The first Phase of IFMIS Re-engineering: IFMIS Re-engineering Strategic Plan of (2011-2013)

• The second Phase of IFMIS Re-engineering: IFMIS Re-Engineering Plan of (2013 – 2018)

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 5

IFMIS Re-engineered Components

• Re-engineering for Business Results: This component reviews the business processes for improved financial Management for Plan to Budget, Procure to Pay, Revenue to Cash and Record to Report

• Plan to Budget: A fully integrated process and system that links planning, policy objectives and budget allocation.

• Procure to Pay: To develop a fully integrated and automated supply chain management system.

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 6

IFMIS Re-engineered Components

• Revenue to Cash: Auto-reconciliation of revenue and payments with automatic file generation.

• Record to Report: Secure two way interface with CBK for accurate, up to date information on the GOK financial position and the production of statutory reports real time.

• ICT to Support: Dedicated IFMIS support functions for software, hardware and infrastructure.

• Communicate to Change: IFMIS Academy for capacity building and continuous learning.

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 7

IFMIS Modules

1. Accounts Payable

2. Accounts Receivable

3. Purchasing Order

4. Fixed Assets

5. General Ledger

6. Cash Management

7. e-Procurement

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 8

IFMIS Benefits

• Enables efficient resource allocation mechanisms;

• Improves management information for decision making;

• Establishes effective links between key players in accounting and financial management;

• Improves financial controls by availing reliable and timely financial information,

• Improves accounting, recording and reporting through timely, accurate financial data provision;

• Accelerates the pace / scope of economic growth;

• Enhances development partners’ confidence.

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 9

IFMIS Benefits, In Summary:

• Enable government reform

• Improve efficiency and controls

• Improve confidence through transparency

• Increase government revenue

• Reduce costs

• Improve budgets, planning and decision-making

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 10

Key IFMIS Implementation Steps

• The preparation of the initial need assessment;

• Requirement gathering and delivery of system specifications;

• The design and delivery of a uniform chart of accounts across the public service;

• The preparation and delivery of accepted rules and procedures for the new system;

• The evaluation, selection and procurement of software and hardware applications;

• The system integration, testing and implementation;

• The audit/evaluation of project progress and results.

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 11

IFMIS Implementation Challenges

1. Institutional Challenges• Legal framework – IFMIS must be underpinned by a coherent legal

framework governing the overall public finance system.

• Business processes – IFMIS generally imply fundamental changes in operating procedures and should be preceded by a detailed functional analysis of processes, procedures, user profiles and requirement that the system will support.

• Budget and account structure – Implementing IFMIS requires that many government structures start working with common tools. For the information to be coherent, all administrative units at national, regional and local level need to adopt a common language in the form of unified budget classifications and charts of accounts.

• Centralized treasury operations – IFMIS reform is often accompanied by the consolidation of all government financial resources in a single treasury account or a set of linked accounts.

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 12

IFMIS Implementation Challenges

2. Political Challenges

• People – User Resistance

• Organization with its own unique features

– Politics

– Culture

– Organization Structures

– Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)

3. Technical Challenges

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 13

Challenges summary

• Inadequate planning;

• Poor communication between implementers, donors and government;

• Shortage of management capacity and resources;

• Changes in system design without full agreement of all;

• Poorly implemented trainings.

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 14

Integration of IFMIS with other third party systems

• Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) – Account Receivable – Working with KRA and CBK to operationalize this interface.

• Commonwealth Secretariat Debt and Resource Management System (CS-DRMS) – Debt Management System with IFMIS Account Payable and General Ledger – Process of Loan repayment – Dependent on CBK

• Electronic Project Management Information System (E-PROMIS) – Work in progress

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 15

Integration of IFMIS with other third party systems

• Pension Management Information System (PMIS) – Work in progress

• Government Human Resources Information System (GHRIS) – Work in progress

• Group Personal Accident (GPA) with IFMIS Accounts Payable.

• Note: Now implementing Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) to manage these integrations

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 16

IFMIS System Audit Process• IT Governance (Review Organogram, Business Strategy, IS Policy)

• IT Controls

– Physical and Environmental Controls,

– Logical Access Controls,

• Application Controls (Module by Module)

– Input Controls,

– Processing Controls,

– Output Controls, and

– Master/Standing Data Files Controls,

• IT Security Controls (Security Policy)

• IT Operations,

• Change Management Controls,

• Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP),

• Development and Acquisition

• Outsourcing.31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 17

IFMIS Effectiveness Audit

• Public Sector Reforms & IFMIS

• IFMIS Performance Review

• Assessment of Systems & Processes

• Assessment of Financial Reporting from IFMIS

• Assessment of IFMIS Applications Acquisition & Vendor Performance Analysis

• Assessment of IFMIS User Adoption Levels

• Review of IFMIS Academy

• Assessment of IFMIS ICT Support & Governance

31 July, 2016Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector

18

Reality Check

• Kenya enacted the New Constitution in 2010

• With the new constitution, two levels of government have been created, National and County.

• It is no longer a unitary government but stratified.

• Can IFMIS work as expected?

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 19

IFMIS Kenya Challenges

A. National Government

1. People Challenges – User resistance, Skills e.t.c

2. Technology Challenges

– Hardware and software

– Integration Issues. Still fully integration with third party systems has not been achieved.

3. Security Challenges

– IT Security

– Cyber attacks31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 20

IFMIS Kenya Challenges

B. County Government

1. People Challenges – User resistance, Skills e.t.c

2. Technology Challenges

– Lack of full connectivity especial in County Governments

– No connectivity in most of sub-counties in County Government

– Most of the counties cannot handle Revenue Collection using IFMIS

– Hardware and Software

3. Security Challenges: IT Security, Cyber attacks 31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 21

Proposed Ideal Situation

• Have IFMIS for National Government (as it was initially planned to be)

• Design IFMIS for County Governments (County Government have their unique features)

• Integrate the two for monitoring purposes.

• In so doing you ease management and avoid single point of failure

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 22

References[1] Public Audit Act 2015

[2] Chêne, M. (2009). The implementation of integrated financial information management system (IFMIS). Transparency International, mchene@ transparency. org.

[3] Hendriks, C. J. (2012). Integrated Financial Management Information Systems: Guidelines for effective implementation by the public sector of South Africa. SA Journal of Information Management, 14(1), 9-pages.

[4] Integrated financial management information systems: A practical guide. USAID, 2008.

[5] http://sokodirectory.com/2015/06/report-ifmis-implementation-in-kenyas-government/

[6] http://www.treasury.go.ke/downloads/category/1-integrated-financial-management-informaton-system.html?download=2:ifmis-re-engineering-updates.

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 23

THANK YOU

31 July, 2016 Promoting Accountability in the Public Sector 24

top related