ed6620powerclassroomofthefuture

The Nature of the Classroom of the Future

By: Elizabeth PowerEducation 6620Dr. E. Murphy

Memorial University of Newfoundland

3

As a result of web-based

user empower-ment …..

…a paradigm shift in

education….

…of the magnitude of the printing

press!

Learner Centered Pedagogy

18

10, 13

LEARNER -CENTERED ENVIRON

MENTS

Informal

Collaborative

Engaging

MotivatingReal-life Interests

Virtual Teams

Creativity

Involving

Blended

Learner-Centered Pedagogy Integration

17, 19, 22Collaborative Technology

Learner-Centered Pedagogy Integration

Reduce Isolation

Increase Self-Confidence

Variety of Learning

Opportunities

Instructional Opportunitie

s

Inclusion

Collaborative Technology

17, 19, 22

13

Flexibility in Blended Learning

21

Instructor’s lecture on

target topic by

synthesizing various ideas

manifested in learners’

online messages

Learners post

reflections on issues raised by

the instructor

online

Oral presentation

and discussion by learners

Instructor briefly

introduces the topic of

the next session

Learners continue to discuss the previous

topic online

Learners post their prior understanding of the topic at the

next session online

Face-to-Face Online Face-to-Face Face-to-Face

Online Online

In-Class

Off-Class

The Teaching and Learning Cycle – Blended Learning

4

9

Technology

Driven

Blogging

Podcasting

Wikis

Video-conferencing

Chat RoomsMultimedia

Widgets

Research Tools

Social Bookmarking

Personal Web

Technologies

6, 8, 15, 20

5

DEEP APPROACHES TO STUDY

ENGAGE IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY

QUESTION SOURCESVERIFY INFORMATION

INDEPENDENT THINKING

PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES

FREE, OPEN, ADAPTABLE,

USER-FRIENDLY

6, 20

Student

Space

TimeTraining

Parents

E-LEARNING FLEXIBILITY2

16

Picture Smart Word SmartMusic Smart

Self Smart

Logic Smart

Nature Smart

Body Smart

People Smart

Virtual Environment

Reading/ Conferencing

Video Conference

Problem-solving Technology

Digital Research

Virtual Environment

Music/ Collaboration

Individual Learning Environment

Linking Learning

Styles withTechnology

Designing Future Online Courses

Customized &

Personalized

Awareness of

Learner Differenc

es

Integration of

Learning Styles

1, 25

Embrace value of ICT

Innovative Education Programs

Exposure to & Experience with Online Strategies

TRAINING the TEACHER of the FUTURE

14, 24

7

Blogging As

Reflective

Practice

Virtual

School

11

Embrace value of ICT

Blogging as a Reflective Practice

Cyber Practicum

Innovative Education Programs

Exposure to & Experience with Online StrategiesBest

Technological and Pedagogical

Practices

TRAINING the TEACHER of the FUTURE

12, 14, 23, 24

THANK YOU

REFERENCES

1. Battalio, J. (2009). Success in distance education: Do learning styles and multiple formats matter? The American Journal of Distance Education, 23, 71-87.

2. Boulton, H. (2008). Managing e-Learning: What are the real implications for schools? The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6 (1), 11-18

3. Cifuentes, L., Sharp, A., Bulu, S., Benz, M., & Stough, L. (2010). Developing a Web 2.0-based system with user-authored content for community use and teacher education. Education Technology Research and Development, 58, 377-398.

4. Chen, W., & Looi, C.( ). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach.

5. Courosa (2010). Networked Teacher. Retrieved November22, 2010, from Tangient LLC. Web site: k12learning20.wikispaces.com

6. Dyson, L., Litchfield, A., Lawrence, E., Raban, R., & Leijdekkers, P. (2009). Advancing the m-learning research agenda for active, experiential learning: Four case studies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (2), 250-267

7. Duke WorldPress (2010). Teaching (and Learning) with Google Earth. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Duke World Press Web site: http://sites.duke.edu/blog/2010/01/11/teaching-and-learning-with-google-earth/

8. George-Palilonis, J, & Filak, V. (2009). Blended Learning in the Visual Communications Classroom: Student Reflections on a Multimedia Course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7 (3), 247 – 256.

9. Greenwich Public Schools, (2010). Information Literacy. Retrieved November 22, 1010, from Greenwich Public Schools Web site: www.greenwichschools.org/page.cfm?p=6657

10. Hutchinson, J. (2009). Use of social softare to address literacy and identity issues in second language learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35 (3).

11. Isenhour, P., Carroll, J., Neale, D., Rosson, M., Dunlop, D. (2000). The virtual School: An integrated collaborative environment for the classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 3 (3).

12. Jiyoon, Y. (2008). Cyber practicum: A future practicum classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (1), 163-165.

13. Kim, K., & Bonk, C. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The Survey says … . Educause Quarterly, 4, 22-30.

14. Ladyshewsky, R., & Gardner, P. (2008). Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (3), 241-257.

15. Lee, M., & Hutton, D. (2007). Using interactive videoconferencing technology for international education: The case of ISIS. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4 (8).

16. Logie, S. (2010). ICT/Glow & Learning Styles. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Illumine Ltd. Web site: www.mind-mapping.co.uk/.../education.htm

17. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Podcasting in higher education: What are the implications for teaching and learning? Internet and Higher Education, 12, 88-92.

18. Maydonik, C. (2010). Learner centered pedagogy. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://camilleteaches.com/etec-511/philosophy-of-educational-technology/

19. Mavrou, K., Lewis, A., Douglas, G. (2010). Researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus: The role of the computer. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41 (3), 486-501.

20. McElvaney, J., & Berge, Z. (2009). Weaving a personal web: Using online technologies to create customized, connected, and dynamic learning environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35 (2).

21. Otto, R. (2003). Delivery Modes: Time and place. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Cognitive Design Solutions, Inc. web site: http://www.cognitivedesignsolutions.com

22. Ray, L., & Atwill, K. (2005). The Web and Special Education. Computers in the Schools, 21 (3), 53-67.

23. Sammons, M., & Ruth, S. (2007). The invisible professor and the future of virtual faculty. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4 (1).

24. Sprague, D., Maddux, C., Ferdig, R., & Albion, P. (2007). Online education: Issues and research questions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15 (2), 157-166.

25. Zhang, K., & Bonk, C. (2008). Addressing diverse learner preferences and intelligences with emerging technologies: Matching models to online opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34 (2).