(e)co jury report
Post on 15-Mar-2016
219 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Jury reports Deliverable #6 - auGust 14 2012
co
Jury reports Deliverable #6 - auGust 14 2012
1
5 2. ARCHITECTURAL BRIEF REPORT
11 3. ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION BRIEF REPORT
17 4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY BRIEF REPORT
23 5. COMMNICATIONS AN SOCIAL AWARENESS BRIEF REPORT
29 6. INDUSTRIALIZATION AND SOCIAL AWARENESS BRIEF REPORT
35 7. SUSTAINABILITY BRIEF REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
4
JURY REPORTS
5(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
arCHiteCtural brieF report 2
6
2.1 Introduction
Access to housing is a problem that has been worsening in Western countries in recent years due to the international economic crisis and the housing bubble. Moreover is a deep problem started long time ago in third world countries and in reality subject to rapid urbanization.
If on the other hand, we share the view of James Stirling in which he describes the house as one of the last stages of our everyday identity, we understand that the impacts of these trends, not only put in crisis a democratic right, but also intimate customs and cultural rights.
We believe that the “Sustainability”, is the opportunity of meeting our three social components (political, market society, civil). If on one hand the public opinion feels with increasing intensity the environmental problems and defines a “moral tone” on the other side markets perceive new business opportunities in a sustainable market not yet developed.
Rather than to contrast an approach for the decrease against the pro-growth we believe in a new social rebalancing based on essential values of sustainability. The complexity involved in this deep transformation implies the need to work in multidisciplinary processes and lays the foundation for the development of a new paradigm.
“By its nature the concept of sustainability, which brings together environmental, economic and social development in a single thing has to be integrated. […]This means that traditional approaches are inadequate and that we must go beyond the boundary that separates them from other disciplines.”(Sergio Porta “Dancing Street”)
From this arguments comes from the name of our prototype and team: (e)co means “equilibrium through cooperation” and attempts to express the importance of the collective labour and of the multidisciplinary working, that we conceive as a new potential paradigm for the architecture profession, in order to develop an Architecture which is careful with the environment and the contemporary priorities.
2.2 (e)co Project
(e)co project started from the initiative of a group of students of the ETSAV UPC University, which detected the opportunity, inside the Solardecathlon Europe 2012 Competition, to continue the research line started during the previous edition and to form an experimental work team. (e)co Team goals are the creation of a social network, around the project, which is able to debate in public the role of the Architecture in the critical contemporary social-economical context through the development of alternative methodologies related to the sustainable project, in order to guarantee an Architecture more connected to its inhabitants.
Autonomously the (e)co team has generated a social dynamic inside the University, involving the students, a didactical program and a large multidisciplinary network of collaborators, which are essential for the prototype successful development.
Our team believes that the house, as society, can imitate the natural processes
adapt our new environments
for a sustainablefuture
through cooperation
@
cococo
co
ARCHITECTURAL BRIEF REPORT 2“Even the public opinion accept mass-production entities like cars, schools, refrigerators and so on, the average user sees his home as the last bulwark of his own personal tastes, really as the extension of himself […]
James Stirling
“World Bank and UN outputs are chilling. It speaks for twenty years hence a world where 90% of poverty will be in urban realities and where 50% of ‘humanity will be living below the poverty line and in deprived urban conditions”
Franco la Cecla “Contro l’Architettura”
Figure1.(e)co logo message
JURY REPORTS
7(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
which, in contrast with the common beliefs, are based on the mutual support of systems in equilibrium, and not on competitive mechanisms.
We interpret the house as a system that cooperates with the environment Therefore, the main concerns of our research are:
• The housing accessibility and its costs;
• The ecologic impact control during all processes related to the prototype during all the phases of the project;
• The relationship between the house morphological domestic spaces and the new form of living in a more and more dynamic and changing society (highlighting the equilibrium between new elements and traditional ones);
• The housing durability and its ability to resist the transformations which the users and natural agents go through in time;
• The energy balance of the house during its lifetime;
• The social dynamics that can be generated trough an architectural project.
2.3 Prototype Main Strategy
Solardecathlon is our opportunity to apply a new working method and our philosophy to a real project. Real project boundaries (physical or economic ones) as well as policies are not seen as restrictions but as opportunities to define the adequate strategy. We interpreted the context defined by the Solardecathlon 2012, its rules and their interpretation, as a long process fitted with a previous and post competition life, and not as an ephemeral event.
The legislation introduces many physical entities and restrictions:
• A minimum acclimatized area of 45 m2
• A maximum acclimatized area of 70 m2
• A maximum architectural footprint of 150 m2
• A minimum internal space height of 2.20 m
• A solar envelope geometrically described by the figure below
Coherently with a discourse of comfort balance, economic and energy footprint, we are interested in taking advantage of this dichotomy between “acclimatized area” and “not acclimatized area”. Through it we criticize our needs and the energy required to satisfy this needs.
Is it really always necessary for all of our living spaces to meet comfort standards at the same time?
What is the energy involved in order to achieve sustainability?
What do we mean with “comfort”?
And how far it could be accomplished using only physical processes and passive energy?
Figure2.Prototype main strategy
8
By comparing maximum and minimum, we introduce, in economic terms our intention to occupy the maximum volume allowed without it being all acclimatized. Therefore we are able to offer the same volume with a relevant lower cost.
This extra volume generated by an exterior primary skin, decreases the price per m2 or m3 of the house, also ensuring a necessary comfort areas. The first envelope has to solve some primary problems as water tightness and wind protection. But also we require it some important strategically features:
• Low-cost
• Bioclimatic contribution
• Energy intake
• Atmosphere protection and filtering
• Space and architectural quality
(e)co operates as a “box in box” prototype where each layer has its own features and requirements. The low cost greenhouse envelope defines a hybrid intermediate space and also allows us dissociate these acclimatized zones and to manage them in smaller independent volumes. On the one hand the outer skin has to be a primary optimized element able to cope with external agents. On the other hand the inner skin is protected from the agents, however it has to solve high comfort control and low environmental impact.
2.3 House Design Description
Analyzing the actual economic system where the industrialized processes are in antithesis with local micro economies, our reflection on this subject is materialized as the separation of the prototype in two basic cycles:
• Exterior Industrialized Cycle
• Interior Organic Cycle.
The tension between these components generate a third entities that we call:
• In-between space
The disintegration of domestic space for different grades is also relevant to develop new responses that architecture has to know how to offer in a society where high social nomadism becomes high private nomadism. Contemporary homes have to be able to withstand constant changes of user and to show this flexibility and durability to different uses as its primary virtue.
First skin: industrialized systems- agricultural greenhouses
The first skin (Industrialized, technical Cycle) aims to solve basic environment relation phenomena. In order to occupy the maximum volume allowed with a lower cost, we chose a standard greenhouse system already existing in the market.
The first building skin is acting as a filter. Thanks to its varying enclosure walls, it allows the greenhouse to work as acclimatization machinery. All the façades are covered by cellular polycarbonate prefabricated panels. The opening system is solved by big sliding doors, which allow spatial continuity and the extension of the interspace to the exterior. All the solar capture systems are
Figure3.Axonmetric of different systems, exterior greenhouse envelope and interior modules
JURY REPORTS
9(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
integrated in the greenhouse structure.
Second skin: organic materials modules- physical amd spacial features
The second building skin (Organic Cycle) defines the maximum comfort and quality spaces. Its blueprint represents the minimal area allowed by the competition rules regarding acclimatized spaces: 45m2.
Light and opened elements´ disaggregation allows an easier energetic management and different spaces interpretations by different inhabitants of the dwelling.
Apart form all technologic and climatic features as well as plumbing and installation of all kind, the exterior skin allows an organic/natural design of the interior modules, which are able to be biodegradable and recyclable. This way the dichotomy between the two defined cycles is accomplished.
The three modules are conceived as three volumes which are free to the user interpretation. The three modules incorporate records to be used as a bathroom or kitchen.
The structure is built with laminated wood panels. The wooden structure is the internal finish as well. All the doors chosen are all equals to ensure indeterminacy to the three modules. A skylight in each module allows the extension of the vertical gaze to the volume generated by the greenhouse. Doubling the surface of the modules and taking into account the attic surface, we are able to offer at the same price, 163 m2 rather than 128 m2 (128m2 + 35 of useful area of the loft).
In-beetween space, microclimatic space
The joint between inner and outer building skins has a depth and a function. So we may define it as a “limit” and understand it as a relationships and exchanges space. Using this first filter we are able to generate a hybrid basic micro-climatic space. This last defined space is able to offer the inhabitants a passive economical approach towards meeting comfort standards. It also generates an interactive environment between interior and exterior space, public and private space, that we call “intermediate space”.
The intermediate space is the revolutionary element of our project. Through it, we criticize the energy demand of an ordinary dwelling and we define new existential appropriable spaces which do not need to always meet comfort standards.
3. Architecture and users, “resistance to life”
The disintegration of domestic space in different gradients is also relevant to develop new solutions that architecture has to have in a society where high social nomadism becomes high private nomadism. Contemporary dwellings have to be able to withstand constant changes of user and to show this flexibility and durability to different uses as its primary virtue. To achieve this feature that we will call it “resistance to life”, the (e)co prototype offers itself to the users with an high grade of indetermination. It aims to be able to offer a comfortable livable structure that can be appropriated by the potential different users. In order to achieve this purpose we had to stretch the limit between what we thought we had to design as architects and what we don´t have to define, leaving it to be decided by the user. What we believe to really make the architecture alive, from the technical facilities (deigned in a flexible manner without being linked to a specific user) to the modules facades is to promote and simulate the users’ interpretation processes.
10
JURY REPORTS
11(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
eNGiNeeriNG aND CoNstruCtioN
brieF report
3
12
eNGINeeRING AND CONSTRUCTION BRIeF RePORT
32.1 Introduction
Energetic and constructive decisions in (e)co has been used not only as a resolvent tools but also a project component from the begining. That is the reason why the aesthetics project answer to functional and constructive criteria.
The constructive and engineering strategy responds to values based on function-ality from the reinterpretation of existent systems. Taking elementary solutions and systems to adapt and transform them according to contemporany needs. In-novate the elementary reinterpreting and evolving each component and system.
This strategy has been carried out through three basic principles.
- Indecisiveness between systems: Our project is based on the indecisiveness between systems to get more user’s flexybility and adaptability in spaces ap-propriation. That is the reason why constructive systems become independents to avoid determination among them, limiting the adaptability or perfectibility ca-pacity.
- Easy construction: We understand that easy construction is a valu in our project not only for the contexts conditions but it also offers easy recognizable systems , so they are modifiable or even self-constructed by users. This attitude has carried us to simplify and clarify constructive and engineering systems to be able to build them without using heavy machinery or technicians on site.
- Maximum simplicity maximum funcionality. Due to the project importance of constructive systems, we have sought that solutions adopted respond to more than one function, looking for maximum simplicity and efficiency of constructve systems.
ElEmEntary systEms
INDECISIVENESS OF SYSTEMS
reinterpretation
Maximum adaptability or perfectibility capacity
EASY CONSTRUCTION
Minimum specialize machinery (construction)
Mínimum technicians (facilities)
self-construction
tend to
MAXIMUM SIMPLICITY MAXIMUM FUNCIONALITY
Rethink the systems to increase their functio-nality without decrease sin their simplicity
MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY
Figure 1.Instalations ring for plug and play module conection to greenhouse facilities
JURY REPORTS
13(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
2.3. Innovative systems:
ELECTRICAL AND HOME AUTOMATION SYSTEM
The layout of the facilities, electrical, home automation and water is formed by a perimeter ring attached to the outer skin.
The indecisiveness between facilities and the interior space of each modul and the distribution of furniture allows the user maximum flexibility to adapt the spaces to the needs of eachone.
The perimeter ring generate flexible and adaptable entry and exit points to allow changes throughout the user’s life. The only element linked to the outer skin are the photovoltaic panels that also favor the behavior of the greenhouse climate increassing air pressures gener-ating artificial ventilation.
CLIMATIC SYSTEM
HEATING SYSTEM
1. Exterior air entering to deposit gravel (inertia tank) on the south facade.2. Insulated tank with gravel inside. During the day it is open, exposed to sun in order to heat gravels. At night stays closed to prevent heat losses.3. The air circulating inside the gravel is heated and propelled to modules.4. Air of the main duct is derived to each module with flow control system.5. The air entering each module is controlled through a temperature system.6. The air is carried on the inside of the modules by a perforated pipe for bet-ter and more comfortable distribution of it.7. Each module renews the air gap. The system works by overpressure renewal.8. The stale air that ends up in the intermediate space is naturally renewed by forced ventilation and infiltration of the outer skin.
COOLING SYSTEM
1. Exterior air entering to deposit gravel (inertia tank) on the north facade.2. Isolated tank with gravel inside. During the day is closed to preserve fresh-ness. During the night is opened to cool the inertia tank (night) and ventilation.3. The air that circulates inside the gravel is cooled and is driven to the module.4. Air of the main duct is derived to each module with flow control system.5. The air entering each module is calibrated with temperature control systems.6. The air is carried on the inside of the modules by a perforated pipe for bet-ter and more comfortable distribution of it.7. Each module renews the air gap. The renewal system works by overpressure.8. The stale air that ends up in the intermediate space is renewed naturally by forced ventilation and infiltration of the outer skin.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.6.
7.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.6.
7.
7.
8.
Figure 2.Electrical and domotic systems
Figure 3.Climatic systems scheme
El prototipo está formado por dos pieles: una piel exterior industrializada y una piel interior flexible, biodegradable y fácil de transformar.
Dentro del invernadero, la casa se organiza a través de 3 módulos de madera.
Las relaciones entre los módulos con la piel exterior genera una secuencia de espacios intermedios; el exterior entra y se fusiona con el espacio hacia el interior.
MATERIALESEstructura Interior
KLH : Los módulos interiores son de paneles laminados de madera de abeto autoportantes.Panel 90mm de espesor.
Estructura Exterior
Estructura de acero galvanizado recubierta de paneles de policarbonato celular.
5ST-001
Structural Axonometric
5ST-001
Structural Axonometric
Módulo de madera:
espacio interior privado independiente energéticamente de los otros módulos, ahorrando energía, y pudiendo ser calentado o refrigerado en función de las necesidades del usuario.
Espacios intermedios:
espacios entre interior-exterior que gozan de confort térmico y visual, contribuyen en la gestión de energía pasiva controlada y son apropiables de forma diferente por cada usuario.
Estructura invernadero:
Piel exterior industrializada de acero galvanizado con fachadas de policarbonato celular que funciona de protección solar.
El prototipo está formado por dos pieles: una piel exterior industrializada y una piel interior flexible, biodegradable y fácil de transformar.
Dentro del invernadero, la casa se organiza a través de 3 módulos de madera.
Las relaciones entre los módulos con la piel exterior genera una secuencia de espacios intermedios; el exterior entra y se fusiona con el espacio hacia el interior.
MATERIALESEstructura Interior
KLH : Los módulos interiores son de paneles laminados de madera de abeto autoportantes.Panel 90mm de espesor.
Estructura Exterior
Estructura de acero galvanizado recubierta de paneles de policarbonato celular.
5ST-001
Structural Axonometric
5ST-001
Structural Axonometric
Módulo de madera:
espacio interior privado independiente energéticamente de los otros módulos, ahorrando energía, y pudiendo ser calentado o refrigerado en función de las necesidades del usuario.
Espacios intermedios:
espacios entre interior-exterior que gozan de confort térmico y visual, contribuyen en la gestión de energía pasiva controlada y son apropiables de forma diferente por cada usuario.
Estructura invernadero:
Piel exterior industrializada de acero galvanizado con fachadas de policarbonato celular que funciona de protección solar.
Figure 5.(e)co systems description
16
JURY REPORTS
17(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
eNerGy eFFiCieNCy brieF report4
18
energy efficiency brief report 44.1 Introduction The project explores concepts such as solar thermal energy captation and accumulation, energy generation, considering the dwelling as an active object in relation to the user by creating flexible intermediate spaces and varying microclimates 24 hours a day, 365 days per year. It researches highly important aspects such as natural lighting and low consumption systems.
The chosen bioclimatic architecture solutions are based on the use of materials of reasonable cost, tending towards solutions “Low-tech”, betting on innovative and optimized combination of materials rather than solutions “high-tech” that often have the greatest environmental impact.
4.2 Efficiency of the House`s Envelope.
(e)co Project aims to generate maximum comfort level inside the micro climatic space during the entire year in order to achieve a minimal economic cost and energy consumption. It is introduced the concept of “useful temporary area”.
So, our project aims to take benefit from a Low Tech concept. It stores the solar thermal energy and takes advantage of the natural light, low consumption appliances in order to optimize the energy demand.
(e)co’s bioclimatic strategy is based on the continuous study of intermediate spaces and the creation of microclimates. It understand the household as an active purpose in direct relationship with the user by creating adaptable intermediate spaces that vary throughout the seasons and during the day.
A study about different shape solutions has been carried out in which a specific volume has been conditioned and thermally insulated, surrounded by an envelope creating different kinds of spaces.
As it can be observed, thermal conditions in microclimates and their evolution are directly related to the decisions made regarding the shape of the volume. It is interesting to understand these spaces as additional areas that can be used at different times of the day and the seasons.
(e)co takes advantage of these intermediate spaces to provide the user with an additional useful surface. This space is not conditioned, and its comfort depends on the correct use of climatic conditions. It has to be understood that this space will be different depending on the time of the day and the season; therefore the household, regarding its spaces, varies during the day and the season.
4.3 Efficiency of passive or mostly passive
Echo uses different passive systems to adapt to environmental changes. The systems are:
* Greenhouse effect
The outer skin of polycarbonate addition to being the first barrier against water and wind produces the phenomenon of “greenhouse effect” benefiting themaximum solar radiation.
Gross area: 150 m2
Gross Volume: 557.32 m3
Surface area: 328.46 m2
Net floor area: 45.45 m2
Conditioned Volume: 104.5 m3
Figure 1.In-between area
Figure2.acondicionated area
JURY REPORTS
19(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
• Ventilation
Natural ventilation supply and remove air through an indoor space by natural means. There are two types of natural ventilation occurring in buildings: wind driven ventilation and stack ventilation. The pressures generated by buoyancy, also known as ‘the stack effect’, are quite low (typical values: 0.3 Pa to 3 Pa) while wind pressures are usually far greater (~1 Pa to 35 Pa). The majority of buildings employing natural ventilation rely primarily on wind driven ventilation, but stack ventilation has several benefits. The most efficient design for a natural ventilation building should implement both types of ventilation.
• Insulation and shadow
A proper balance between insulation and ventilation is essential to maintain adequate indoor thermal conditions. The dynamic simulation tool helped us to define architectural and occultation strategies in order to control direct solar gain transmitted to the interior of the house.
“During the cold winter days the outer skin remove its sun protections, it is closed and uses its translucency to act like a greenhouse. In this way, leaves to enter a big part of the solar radiation into its interior and so, the interior materials are heated up to emit heat in infrared. “
“During the hot summer days, our greenhouse is covered with an interior sunscreen, avoiding direct solar radiation and therefore the overheating of our intermediate space. The filters generate interstitial spaces between the layers (shading mesh and polycarbonate) making a difference in temperatures that will help heat circulation and therefore a natural ventilation.”
“Natural ventilation allow that overheating effect is not occur on the “in-between” due the greenhouse effect. Ventilation is produced from the facade elements to the “photovoltaic roof top hatches” and is favored by the suction effect resulting from the air chamber between the roof and shade screen, hot air under the photovoltaic panels and the venturi effect produced on “photovoltaic roof top hatche”
The direct relationship with the outside echo makes the radiation on the inner surfaces changes considerably, both spatially and temporally. Sunscreens are mainly mobile allowing the house changes throughout the day. For example, in summer, solar radiation is welcome in the early hours of the morning as it has to be avoided as the day progresses.
Figure 3 and 4.Winter day
Figure 5. CFD natural ventilation.
Figure 6.Solar radiation studio.
20
• Vegetation adiabatic strategy.
(e)co has an innovative air humidification system. This system humidified air through the plant stratum. Each gram of water evaporated by vegetation absorbs 540 calories of the air. In addition, the vegetation serves as a natural filter of the air pollutants, fixing the carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen. When we enter an area with abundant vegetation, we note that “its cooler”, because the plants retain moisture and cool the environment. oInertia.
4.4 Efficiency of semi-active system
Thermal mass and mechanical ventilation system
As we have a building that has no mass or inertia we pretend to put our house in order with a system that does not work independently but with a complementary functioning, instead it is integrated in global strategy of the project. Our climatic support strategy is based on capturing and accumulation energy.
In order for the greenhouse-shaded house system to be fully efficient, it is necessary to include an energy-storage system, a buffer tank. The greenhouse-shaded house conditions both the intermediate and the indoors spaces at those times when energy demands are low; the buffer tank helps condition the house when the demands are maximum.
Our system uses the gravel as a heat source (in the winter) or a heat sink (in the summer). This design takes advantage of the moderate temperatures in the objects with high mass due to the inertia or capability to store heat, in order to boost efficiency and reduce the operational costs of heating and cooling systems, and may be combined with solar heating to form a geosolar system with even greater efficiency in order to establish consistent regulation according to external conditions, it is necessary to develop different strategies depending on the period of time of year. For each system, we distinguish winter running and summer running.
the mechanical ventilation of the house is taking the air from btween space (the space is sufficient air changes an hour to consider appropriate). Being a pre-heated air in a better position than the outside air, the impact of air over the temperature of the modules is less than if we take it outside.
Heating System
1.
2.
3.
7.
8.
“humidification system has a local impact on the occupants of the gap. This is a mobile system similiar to a floor lamp.”
Heating system
1. Exterior air entry2. Inertia tank3. Hot air duct4. Derivations with flow control5. Individual temperature control system6. Impulsed air through perforated tube 7. Air renovation with the intemediate spaces8. Natural air renovation of the foul air.
Figure7.Adiabatic strategy
Figure 8. Heating System
4.
5.
6.
8
JURY REPORTS
21(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
4.4 Energy analysis of the house and anual consumption estiamtion
The low demand allows the home to operate completely passive systems, or what would be called “free cooling” and “free heating”.
Taking into account both the modules and the gap we should take into account the hours that are within the margins of thermal comfort. The following chart s hows the hours in which at least one of the spaces of the house is within these margins in times of heat.
4.5 Efficiency of the appliances and energy saving mechanisms.
2000
1500
1000
500
0 Kwh
500
1000
1500
(e)co
uso de la viviendaKwh/m2/25años verano e invierno
Kwh/m2/25años
Tratamiento ciclo agua
Kwh/m2/25años
producción fotovoltai-ca Kwh/m2/25años
13001300
918.30
2002. 5
57.08 133.75
1368.82
82,43%
93%
68%
57%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Porcentaje de horas en las que al menos una zona de la vivienda seencuentra en confort
ASHRAE 55 EN UNE 15251 RITE ISO 7730
1. Exterior air entry2. Inertia tank3. Cold air duct4. Derivations with flow control5. Individual temperature control system6. Impulsed air through perforated tube 7. Air renovation with the intemediate spaces8. Natural air renovation of the foul air.
“The anual energy demand valurs of (e)co (14.87 Kwh/m2 cooling; 13.83 Kwh/m2 heating) are low only compared to a house standard, but has values in the passive house standard.”
(e)co has at least one of the areas within the margin of comfort 93% of the time the summer months
(e)co saves 96.5% energy in cooling and heating compared to standard housing due at only using passive systems.
1. Exterior air entry2. Inertia tank3. Cold air duct4. Derivations with flow control5. Individual temperature control system6. Impulsed air through perforated tube 7. Air renovation with the intemediatespaces8. Natural air renovation of the foul air.
Figure 9 ansd 10.Cooling and ventilation system
Figure 10.Anual demand.
Figure 11.Number of hores with zone in confort.
Figure12.Comparison with other buildings (graphic)
3.
Over the life of the home, (e)co consumes less power for heating and cooling and general use than standard dwellings. There is a consumption due to the local water tratment, but whose repayment is guaranteed to save water. A positive balance with greater energy production than consumption results.
22
JURY REPORTS
23(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
CommuNiCatioN aND soCial awareNess brieF report
5
24
1.1 Abstract
For (e)co, one of the main priorities in our project is able to influence emphatically our audience independently of their countries, in addition to being able to create broad awareness and knowledge regarding sustainability, innovation and energy efficiency.
The iniquitous insights regarding global warming encourage us since LOW3 project in 2010 to make a change in our society through cooperation, from low to high scale, trying to get an optimistic awareness where a global change is possible and viable indeed.
Therefore, team visual identity within creative dynamics are adressed in order to achieve these goals. (e)+co together involves the existing social context. (e) “green-at” re-interprets the symbol of our time (@). It represents the equilibrium among systems as well as spiral self-generative. -Co means putting together, to include new research, development and diffusion areas, all based on cooperation.
As a result, (e)co is an alternative way of joining technology, resources and users in order to achieve a sustainable progress focused on the development of architecture. The balance between the vibrant light green that symbolizes modern balance and “co” in black reminder of co2 as well as cooperation give vitality and notoriety to the”brand”
1.2 Communication plan: cooperation
One of the main goals for the team is to nurture cooperation for a new sustainable lifestyle. Therefore, subgoals are stablished in order to achieve them, making audience aware of the possibility of a mind-change through activitives and actions, like a “guerrilla” marketing campaign. It is clear that we must determinate to whom the project messages are addressed. It also gives us guidelines to focus on our main objectives as well to indentify which dynamics and platforms should be used.
The team considered organising seven target groups regarding its ethnology, demography and geography in addition to beginning locally to global scale.
children teenagers young general academic professional non-green
adapt our new environments
for a sustainablefuture
through cooperation
@ cococo
co
CommuniCation and soCial awareness 6Figure1.Team identity
JURY REPORTS
25(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
The team pretend to transform inhabitants of the cities to users of the change we propose, promoting social awareness and knowledge regarding sustainability, innovations and energy efficiency. Through actions and activitys campaign in which low-cost creative means are utilized, the team aims to achieve different goals in a competitive and sometimes unforgiving environment. The team made a calendar where illustrates the different relationships between present and future (e)co activities including its timeline and the seven target audience groups, making activies from childreen to non-green consumers.
The importance of becoming an immediate behavior invites in a friendly way to become participant of cooperation. And we did it through open public journeys, conferences, lessons, congresses, discuccions, workshops, creating subjects from local university, social activities, child and non-green activities, TV and radio appearances and media coverage through media platforms. This way the project turns in fact, into cooperation.
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Des
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
April
May
June
July
Augu
stSe
ptem
ber
Oct
ober
Nov
embe
rD
esem
ber
Janu
ary
Febr
uary
Mar
chAp
rilM
ayJu
neJu
lyAu
gust
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Des
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
April
May
June
July
Augu
st
9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
LOW3 school visits from 2011.09._
Sant Cugat golf project 2011.07._-2012.03._
Conference: Felipe Pich-Aguilera 2011.03.24
SDE Deliverables' presentations a week after
Solar oven party 2011.03.21
Bike ride + Solar breackfast 2011.10.11
Street stand 2011.11.15
Do it yourself academic
Final review 2012.01.26
Group dinner 2012.01.28
Showroom ETSAV 2012.03.10
(e)co elctives subjects 2012.02_2012.07
Pechakucha in COAC 2012.03.21
Team meetings every month
Furniture workshop 2012.03_2012.08
Pich-Aguilera (e)co meeting 2012.04.25
Children Teenagers Young General Academic Professional NON green
colors nous
2012 2013
Loca
l
2010 2011
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Des
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
April
May
June
July
Augu
stSe
ptem
ber
Oct
ober
Nov
embe
rD
esem
ber
Janu
ary
Febr
uary
Mar
chAp
rilM
ayJu
neJu
lyAu
gust
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Des
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
April
May
June
July
Augu
st
9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Workshop: Jornadas de intercambio y cooperación 2011.06.29 - 07.08
touring exposure 2011.09._-2012-06._
Guided visit: Pich-Aguilera studio 2011.03.17
Guided visit: Media-TIC building (Cloud 9) 2011.03.04
UIC reviews 2011.03.28
Institutional meeting 2012.02.07
Seasonal land art activity 2011.12._
Living lab low3 inauguration 2011.05.20
ETSAV spring party 2012.05.12
(e)co construction 2012.02.15 - 06.20
Workshop: ecologic food 2011.06.29 - 07.08
Arquin7 2011.10.06
Gardering for childrens 2012.10.22
Unesco Catedra conference 2011.12.10
QR pictures 2012.02 - 04
Press conference 2012.02.07
In-sostenible journeys 2012.03.15
Conference: what is a decathlete? 2012.05.07
Official (e)co presentation 2012.05.17
Children Teenagers Young General Academic Professional NON green
colors nous
2012 2013
Met
ropo
litan
are
a
2010 2011
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Des
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
April
May
June
July
Augu
stSe
ptem
ber
Oct
ober
Nov
embe
rD
esem
ber
Janu
ary
Febr
uary
Mar
chAp
rilM
ayJu
neJu
lyAu
gust
Sept
embe
rO
ctob
erN
ovem
ber
Des
embe
rJa
nuar
yFe
brua
ryM
arch
April
May
June
July
Augu
st
9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 # # # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Arte en la cocina (Brazil) from 2011.08._Construmat 2011 2011.05.16-21 fotosConference in Reus 2011.02.15 Visitas guiadas LOW3 sept-nov / jan-juneSDE Bbq in LOW3 2011.05.19Workshop Madrid 2011.10.03-0748h open house bcn 2011.10.22-23Zero energy building congress 2011.11.22In-sostenible COAG congres 2012.02.14BAM exposure 2012.02.14Greek school visit 2012.03.15ECCN congress 2012.05.07Rural studio and danish university visit 2012.05.15
Children Teenagers Young General Academic Professional NON green
colors nous
2012 2013
Glo
bal
2010 2011
electives
(e)co learn and sharevisits
workshops
open bcn
lessons
congresses
conferences
child activities
university
discussions
furniture workshop
Figure3.Actions developed through the guerrilla campaign
Figure2.Actiyitiy calendar of activities developed and confirmed untily July 2013
26
Audience reached from actions
Throughout past two years, the team made around 35 open activities distributed in 18 locals, 11 national and 6 international. As a “guerrilla” marketing campaign in which low cost is one of the main strategies, the team dedicated just 3475 €, including all trips and logystics, .
People involved - nearly about 3515 people.
MEDIA campaign
Beginning from local to national scale, (e)co team established arrangements among media press which included magazines and newspapers interested in subjects as energy sustainability, ecology and architecture.
Furthermore, the communication plan uses other communication channels in order to broadcast our key messages, attaining placement in Media.
Tracking table:
12 articles in newspapers64 articles published in webs and blogs7 TV appearances5 Radio interviews
Thanks to the department of communication of Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya who give us periodically reports of the audience reached just in newspapers, we can show these statistics of the total 12 articles in newspaper:
2.571.800 readers on average1.214,5 cm² of area published9.201 € value
Communication plan: viral campaign
(e)co is also a platform to broadcast our key messages transmitting dissemination of a life model based on cooperation, a model for all scales, for all users, a model which will re-establish the dialog between people and resources (natural / economic), the true meaning of ecology.
There exist several platforms in order to transmit the project through the localized target audience, creating large broadcast and social awareness.
08/02/12EL PUNT AVUIBARCELONA
Prensa: DiariaTirada: 29.993 EjemplaresDifusión: 22.200 Ejemplares
Página: 30Sección: SOCIEDAD Valor: 4.648,00 € Área (cm2): 481,0 Ocupación: 56,43 % Documento: 1/1 Autor: Xavi Aguilar BARCELONA Núm. Lectores: 88800
Cód: 54857881
participative tv television press interviews newspaper radio
Figure4.Activities developed during the Media Campaign
Figure5.(e)co’s message has appeared on different international newspapers, webs blogs, radio stations and Tv channels.
JURY REPORTS
27(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
Awareness campaign to issue our messages is also supported by large media campaign throughout different communication platforms. We actually work with our Webpage, Twitter, Issuu, Facebook page, Blog, Flickr, Wordpress, Vimeo and Youtube Channel. Just as an example, our Facebook page is increasing day by day, currently getting more than 395.150 post views from March of 2011 and more than 1865 followers.
We recently started a publication in our blog where the team writes summaries of the other participating teams. Our blog has more tha 11945 visits.
Innovation
To attain audience and support of non-interested target groups, as we described as nongreen and young audience, became an important novelty as well as an opportunity to carry out by the team. Many activities are focused to create eco-friendly awareness among target groups, organizations and public institutions. Artists, general public and professionals work together on distributing information, generating participation and creating commitment through the (e)community with go(e)co!
Online and offline activities have been organized to attract the attention of non just the general public but other interested audience as well as non-green minds.
Fresh media platforms such as Youtube channel, (e)co page in Facebook, Twitter and blogs, allow the team get more audience in addition to participation and green social awareness.
Some of the most innovative ways to interact with the (e)co project are through web and smartphones as well as generating active participation in our social networks:
• Augmented reality• Interactive virtual tour• Social networks competitions
+ 15000 visits and 30 countries
1865 fans! 443 tweets! 11945 visits!
Figure6.Online viral marketing results in different social networks
28
JURY REPORTS
29(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
iNDustrializatioN aND market viability
6
industrialization and market viability 6
Figure1,2,3.Indetermenancy, (e)co’s key feature
Figure4.Assembly process
1 - Logistic elements2 - Arrival of first lorry3- Foundations4- Pillars 5- Interior module placement6- Roof truss placement7- Exterior façade panels8- Facilities conection9- Garden and wetlands10. Deck assembly and finish11- Sunscreens installation12- Exterior lightning
6.1 INDUSTRALIZATION DEGREE
(e)co is based on open industrialization. It involves using resources already existent in the context market. (e)co’s design coordinates the standard dimensions of components taking into account transport limitations. Innovation is present in the way components are implemented and cooperate within the whole prototype and its environment.
Seeking the reduction of both energy and material wastes due to production, transport, assembling, use and disassembling processes (e)co approaches the closed life cycle concept.
Indeterminacy is (e)co’s key feature. It provides highly flexible spaces adaptable to different uses and simplifies the industrialized production. All modules are equally equipped and climatically independent. This way, instead of a distinct spaces for each activity (e)co provides a neutral game board where users interact actively in the space construction.
Modules can be placed anywhere within the in between space. A change on module’s relative position entails to a completely different space.
(e)co can grow and mutate in time according to user’s needs. It can be expanded by adding trusses as well as completely dismantled to be rebuilt somewhere else.
In height, the standard greenhouse structure stands up to three levels (9m). Optimum climatic comfort is achieved at this high. The interior modules can be dimensioned to stand several levels on top of each other.
(e)co is transported in two lorries: an ordinary one and a special transport.
Combining two opposed strategies -extreme prefabrication for the modules and on-site industrialized assembling system for the external envelope, (e)co achieves an optimal equilibrium between transport an assembly costs and times and releases living space from transport dimensional limitations.
To reduce costs and time, the assembly process pursuit two objectives: the radical reduction of machinery and tools subordination and the organization of the assembly process in several simultaneous tasks.
JURY REPORTS
31(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
External envelope
(e)co equilibrium through coopera�on
ININSA Model PW12,80Standard greenhouse structure
AISLUXArcoplus 324 system polycarbonate and steel proles
Interior models can also be provided in panels to be assembled on site
MADEGESAWood frames Panels arrive on site
set in larger frames made by AISLUX and are xed on site tothe wood substructure
CARPENTRYWood substructure
(e)co can be expanded and dismantled for reuse
Cra� workshop produc�on
tonge and groove joint of façade panels
AISLUXArcoplus 6124 system polycarbonate and steel proles
Roof panels are assembled on site and xed directly to the greenhouse structure. The clipping joint system is quick and easy to
ASSEMBLY
clipping joint of roof panels
ISCLETECModel developed for (e)co, now offered as a new product of the enterpriseSingle pieces can arrive on site to be assembled by a professional orby users themselves
Interior models arrive assembled on siteProduced serially in (e)co's workshop and transported nished in a single lorry.
TOTAL MATERIAL_123.975 €-25% MATERIAL INDUSTRIALIZATION+40.000 € WORKSHOP 132.980 €
ELECTRIC PRODUCTION_6.550 €Photovoltaic panels (Siliken) 4.600 €Inversors (Fronius) 1.950 €
ENVELOPE_26.680 €Polycarbonate (Aislux) 17.400 €Wood frames (Madegesa) 2.600 €Sliding guides (Saheco) 2.150 €Metalic plates (Jose Jove) 2.080 €Meshes' frames (Ininsa) 1.600 €Tex�l meshes (Ulma Argicola) 850 €
STRUCTURE_20.650 € Greenhouse (Ininsa)
WOOD MODULES_46.295 € Structure (KLH) 24.200 €Insula�on (Rockwool+Proclima) 5.300 €Openings (Iscletec) 9.770 €Fixa�ons (Rothoblass) 5.075 €Sanitaries + kitchen 1.950 €
PAVEMENT_3.800 € Europalets (Serradora Boix) 900 €Regulable plots (Suimco) 2.780 €Fixa�ons (Rothoblass) 120 €
BASIC FACILITIES_20.000 € (prices references: iTec)Sanitary Water 1.150 €Electric 4.850 €Sanitary Hot Water 4.000 €Domo�c 10.000 €
SOLAR HOT WATER RAIN WATER CIRCUITPHYTODEPURATION INERCY CLIMATIC SYSTEM FOOD PRODUCTION UNITY
+ VEGETAL HUMIDIFIER
+
+ 4.000 € + 1.000 €+ 5.800 €+ 300 €+ 1.500 €+ 6.000 €186.900 € 1.246 €/m2
+20.000 € TRANSPORT AND ASSEMBLY +7% INDUSTRIAL PROFIT+3% PROJECT COORDINATIONTOTAL: 168.279 €
168.300 € Facili es Modules
(e)co prefab
(e)co Kit
Interior Modulesinterior modules provides 45m2 of clima�zed space highly confortable and exible
The external envelope denes the interspaces and contains the clima�c system and perimeter services ring
ELECTRIC PRODUCTION28m² photovoltaic panels located at roo�op hatches
Facil�es modules serve bothinterspaces and interior modules
Eco is not a nished product, it is func�onal coordina�on of different systems constantly adap�ng to its environment and interac�ng with it
It consist on a set of clima�cally independent volumes connected through interspaces which act as a exible interface between inside and outside.
To achieve this, three dis�nct elements are implemented: the outer envelope, the interior modules and the facili�es modules.
32
6.2 MARKET VIABILITY OF THE PRODUCT
The analysis of the viability of (e)co is centered in Spanish teritory as following the vision of thinking globally and acting locally, we believe that (e)co has the responsability of offering solutions to endemic social issues.
Analysis of the relevant market (ecologic prefabricated buildings)
1. Spanish prefabricated building market is less developed than the European. Advantage: less competitors in the market. Risk: European more experienced firms becoming competitors in the relevant market.
2. Sustainability is a value for all competitors. Risk: declared features do not allways correspond to reallity confusing consumers.
3. Most of the competitors offer modules or assembly systems. (e)co industrialization strategy consists in combining both in order to avoid limitations due to transport and to achieve fast and easy assembly.
4. The majority of firms offers finished products. In contrast, (e)co offers a set of strategies, highly flexible to adapt to specific demands. (e)co also offers KNOW-HOW service and support for autocontruction or customization.
5. The target market of most firms is the end user. (e)co bets for reaching more markets by addressing also constructors and institutions.
6. Sustainability, comfort and architectural quality are “extras”. (e)co aims to make this extra features afordable for a larger target market by:
high level of quality design without the necessity of high-tech products
open industrialization
offering (e)co as a service that can be rented for a limited period of time
perfectability
the possibility to choose the level of prefabrication of each part of (e)co
7. The major part of the competitors is specialized on single family dwellings. Due to its hight flexibility, (e)co is able to accomodate more functions.
8. All of the competitors focuses on new building work. Some suggest the possibility to extend existing dwellings but (e)co explores the possibility of refurbishment and reuse of buildings followings.
Strategic improvement of existing constructions
Reuse of existing buildings
New construction
The main features of (e)co marketing:
• Affordability - High quality at a low cost
• Self-sufficiency - Suitable for places with no facility supplies
• Low Manteninece - Now & here technology makes (e)co elements easily replaceable
• Highly flexible - Perfectable, adaptable to changing demands
• Reversable -
• Adaptability
• Architectural quality
The Spanish context can be described through three main singularities:
• A shift to sustainability
• The burst of the housing bubble
• Reduced access to housing
Compact Habit Noem GoPret a porter
Housesneocasas ekoEtxe (e)co
TARGET MARKETpromoters X Xarchitects Xpublic institutions X Xusers / owners X X X X Xself‐constructors XPRODUCTAplicabilitypavilions X X Xdetached/semidetached X X X X Xmulty‐storey buildings X Xexistent X XSelling strategyturnkey X X X X X Xassembly kit XSustainability LOW HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM HIGHReversibility Y Y N N N Y
main materials concrete wood concretesteel + sandwich
panelconcrete
steel/policarbonate+ wood
Remarcable Passive House recycled materials geothermal pump inbetween space
PRICE(€/m2) 950 1300‐1500 1500 860‐950 850‐1200REMARCABLE FEATURES
rent/post sell services
self‐sufficiency style choiseonly 8 modules,
rigidity, no shape adaptation
diverse size modules Europe market "puzzle" design "puzzle" design
Figure5. Market reach
JURY REPORTS
33(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
50.000,00 €
100.000,00 €
150.000,00 €
200.000,00 €
250.000,00 €
0,00 €
(e)co basic
(e)co sde
standard dwelling
precio vivienda
coste consumo energia 25 años
-9.2%
-18.2%37.449.24 €
18.849.24 €
135.000,00 €
70.728,62 €
186.879,38 €
0,0 €
168.279,38 €
0,0 €
Total amount saved compa-red to average consump onof a standard dwelling in aperiod of 25 years
64.178,62 €
80.000 €
70.000 €
60.000 €
50.000 €
40.000 €
30.000 €
20.000 €
10.000 €
0 €
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
acumulated energy in (e)coacumulated energy cost in standard dwelling
70.728,62 €
6.550,00 €
Dwelling costs + energy consump on of 25 years
900 €/m22
Considering (e)co consume = produccion. Without buying and selling energy to the greed.
NO COST Energy. (e)co Unplugged. Energy amor za on in 25 years
GOLF SANT CUGAT CONTEXT
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_no risc for social exclusion _ single
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_the coopera ve. Mortage payement
Coopera ve cash ow
VACARISSES CONTEXT_single family dweling
244.800 €
211.000 €
274.500 €
Mortage 141.000 €
Mortage 153.000 €
Interests (4%) 76.800 €
Deposit
Deposit
Interests (4%) 63.500 €
70.000 €
168.000 €
15.000 €
10 15 20 22 25 29987654321
406.800 €
240.000 €195.000 €
70.000 €
6.000 €/año
13.200 €/año
10 15 18987654321
Rent of (e)co 166.800 €
Tota
l (e)
co se
rvice
21
1.80
0 €
Construc on of (e)co in Sant Cugat 45.000 €
Pitch & Pu extension 125.000 €
Access footbridge 40.000 €Urbaniza on 30.000 €
10 15 18987654321
10 15987654321
74.200 €
1,460.500 €
1,123.500 €
215.000 €
Couple 40 years old + childrenIncome: 1.200 € + 1.200 € = 2.400 €Saving: 35.000 € + 35.000 €Mortage: 800 €/month (33%)
(e)co BASIC = 168.000 €
Lot: rent = 3.000 €/monthConnec on to supplies: Already connected +36.000 €/year
No risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 2.000 € / 2.500 €Monthly rent: 250 € / 350 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
Cohabita on 3 young peopleIncome: 800 € + 800 € + 400 € = 2.000 €Savings: 5.000 € x 3Mortage: 600 €/month (33%)
(e)co KIT = 125.000 €
The project, born with the aim of extending the life span of the prototype once the compe on is over as well as helping nance it, represents the possibility of using the prototype as an access pavilion at the golf court in Sant Cugat.
The proposal consists of installing the prototype on the pitch & pu area at the golf club, on a cession of use regime. The golf club will pay for the services lease and will allow the temporary use of the prototype for research purposes as well as for environmental educa on on the Collserola Natural Park, next to the golf camp site.
Risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 1.000 € / 1.500 €Monthly rent: 125 € / 225 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
1 5 10 20 25 3015
50.000,00 €
100.000,00 €
150.000,00 €
200.000,00 €
250.000,00 €
0,00 €
(e)co basic
(e)co sde
standard dwelling
precio vivienda
coste consumo energia 25 años
-9.2%
-18.2%37.449.24 €
18.849.24 €
135.000,00 €
70.728,62 €
186.879,38 €
0,0 €
168.279,38 €
0,0 €
Total amount saved compa-red to average consump onof a standard dwelling in aperiod of 25 years
64.178,62 €
80.000 €
70.000 €
60.000 €
50.000 €
40.000 €
30.000 €
20.000 €
10.000 €
0 €
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
acumulated energy in (e)coacumulated energy cost in standard dwelling
70.728,62 €
6.550,00 €
Dwelling costs + energy consump on of 25 years
900 €/m22
Considering (e)co consume = produccion. Without buying and selling energy to the greed.
NO COST Energy. (e)co Unplugged. Energy amor za on in 25 years
GOLF SANT CUGAT CONTEXT
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_no risc for social exclusion _ single
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_the coopera ve. Mortage payement
Coopera ve cash ow
VACARISSES CONTEXT_single family dweling
244.800 €
211.000 €
274.500 €
Mortage 141.000 €
Mortage 153.000 €
Interests (4%) 76.800 €
Deposit
Deposit
Interests (4%) 63.500 €
70.000 €
168.000 €
15.000 €
10 15 20 22 25 29987654321
406.800 €
240.000 €195.000 €
70.000 €
6.000 €/año
13.200 €/año
10 15 18987654321
Rent of (e)co 166.800 €
Tota
l (e)
co se
rvice
21
1.80
0 €
Construc on of (e)co in Sant Cugat 45.000 €
Pitch & Pu extension 125.000 €
Access footbridge 40.000 €Urbaniza on 30.000 €
10 15 18987654321
10 15987654321
74.200 €
1,460.500 €
1,123.500 €
215.000 €
Couple 40 years old + childrenIncome: 1.200 € + 1.200 € = 2.400 €Saving: 35.000 € + 35.000 €Mortage: 800 €/month (33%)
(e)co BASIC = 168.000 €
Lot: rent = 3.000 €/monthConnec on to supplies: Already connected +36.000 €/year
No risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 2.000 € / 2.500 €Monthly rent: 250 € / 350 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
Cohabita on 3 young peopleIncome: 800 € + 800 € + 400 € = 2.000 €Savings: 5.000 € x 3Mortage: 600 €/month (33%)
(e)co KIT = 125.000 €
The project, born with the aim of extending the life span of the prototype once the compe on is over as well as helping nance it, represents the possibility of using the prototype as an access pavilion at the golf court in Sant Cugat.
The proposal consists of installing the prototype on the pitch & pu area at the golf club, on a cession of use regime. The golf club will pay for the services lease and will allow the temporary use of the prototype for research purposes as well as for environmental educa on on the Collserola Natural Park, next to the golf camp site.
Risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 1.000 € / 1.500 €Monthly rent: 125 € / 225 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
1 5 10 20 25 3015
50.000,00 €
100.000,00 €
150.000,00 €
200.000,00 €
250.000,00 €
0,00 €
(e)co basic
(e)co sde
standard dwelling
precio vivienda
coste consumo energia 25 años
-9.2%
-18.2%37.449.24 €
18.849.24 €
135.000,00 €
70.728,62 €
186.879,38 €
0,0 €
168.279,38 €
0,0 €
Total amount saved compa-red to average consump onof a standard dwelling in aperiod of 25 years
64.178,62 €
80.000 €
70.000 €
60.000 €
50.000 €
40.000 €
30.000 €
20.000 €
10.000 €
0 €
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
acumulated energy in (e)coacumulated energy cost in standard dwelling
70.728,62 €
6.550,00 €
Dwelling costs + energy consump on of 25 years
900 €/m22
Considering (e)co consume = produccion. Without buying and selling energy to the greed.
NO COST Energy. (e)co Unplugged. Energy amor za on in 25 years
GOLF SANT CUGAT CONTEXT
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_no risc for social exclusion _ single
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_the coopera ve. Mortage payement
Coopera ve cash ow
VACARISSES CONTEXT_single family dweling
244.800 €
211.000 €
274.500 €
Mortage 141.000 €
Mortage 153.000 €
Interests (4%) 76.800 €
Deposit
Deposit
Interests (4%) 63.500 €
70.000 €
168.000 €
15.000 €
10 15 20 22 25 29987654321
406.800 €
240.000 €195.000 €
70.000 €
6.000 €/año
13.200 €/año
10 15 18987654321
Rent of (e)co 166.800 €
Tota
l (e)
co se
rvice
21
1.80
0 €
Construc on of (e)co in Sant Cugat 45.000 €
Pitch & Pu extension 125.000 €
Access footbridge 40.000 €Urbaniza on 30.000 €
10 15 18987654321
10 15987654321
74.200 €
1,460.500 €
1,123.500 €
215.000 €
Couple 40 years old + childrenIncome: 1.200 € + 1.200 € = 2.400 €Saving: 35.000 € + 35.000 €Mortage: 800 €/month (33%)
(e)co BASIC = 168.000 €
Lot: rent = 3.000 €/monthConnec on to supplies: Already connected +36.000 €/year
No risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 2.000 € / 2.500 €Monthly rent: 250 € / 350 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
Cohabita on 3 young peopleIncome: 800 € + 800 € + 400 € = 2.000 €Savings: 5.000 € x 3Mortage: 600 €/month (33%)
(e)co KIT = 125.000 €
The project, born with the aim of extending the life span of the prototype once the compe on is over as well as helping nance it, represents the possibility of using the prototype as an access pavilion at the golf court in Sant Cugat.
The proposal consists of installing the prototype on the pitch & pu area at the golf club, on a cession of use regime. The golf club will pay for the services lease and will allow the temporary use of the prototype for research purposes as well as for environmental educa on on the Collserola Natural Park, next to the golf camp site.
Risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 1.000 € / 1.500 €Monthly rent: 125 € / 225 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
1 5 10 20 25 3015
50.000,00 €
100.000,00 €
150.000,00 €
200.000,00 €
250.000,00 €
0,00 €
(e)co basic
(e)co sde
standard dwelling
precio vivienda
coste consumo energia 25 años
-9.2%
-18.2%37.449.24 €
18.849.24 €
135.000,00 €
70.728,62 €
186.879,38 €
0,0 €
168.279,38 €
0,0 €
Total amount saved compa-red to average consump onof a standard dwelling in aperiod of 25 years
64.178,62 €
80.000 €
70.000 €
60.000 €
50.000 €
40.000 €
30.000 €
20.000 €
10.000 €
0 €
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
acumulated energy in (e)coacumulated energy cost in standard dwelling
70.728,62 €
6.550,00 €
Dwelling costs + energy consump on of 25 years
900 €/m22
Considering (e)co consume = produccion. Without buying and selling energy to the greed.
NO COST Energy. (e)co Unplugged. Energy amor za on in 25 years
GOLF SANT CUGAT CONTEXT
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_no risc for social exclusion _ single
SOSTRE CIVIC CONTEXT_the coopera ve. Mortage payement
Coopera ve cash ow
VACARISSES CONTEXT_single family dweling
244.800 €
211.000 €
274.500 €
Mortage 141.000 €
Mortage 153.000 €
Interests (4%) 76.800 €
Deposit
Deposit
Interests (4%) 63.500 €
70.000 €
168.000 €
15.000 €
10 15 20 22 25 29987654321
406.800 €
240.000 €195.000 €
70.000 €
6.000 €/año
13.200 €/año
10 15 18987654321
Rent of (e)co 166.800 €
Tota
l (e)
co se
rvice
21
1.80
0 €
Construc on of (e)co in Sant Cugat 45.000 €
Pitch & Pu extension 125.000 €
Access footbridge 40.000 €Urbaniza on 30.000 €
10 15 18987654321
10 15987654321
74.200 €
1,460.500 €
1,123.500 €
215.000 €
Couple 40 years old + childrenIncome: 1.200 € + 1.200 € = 2.400 €Saving: 35.000 € + 35.000 €Mortage: 800 €/month (33%)
(e)co BASIC = 168.000 €
Lot: rent = 3.000 €/monthConnec on to supplies: Already connected +36.000 €/year
No risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 2.000 € / 2.500 €Monthly rent: 250 € / 350 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
Cohabita on 3 young peopleIncome: 800 € + 800 € + 400 € = 2.000 €Savings: 5.000 € x 3Mortage: 600 €/month (33%)
(e)co KIT = 125.000 €
The project, born with the aim of extending the life span of the prototype once the compe on is over as well as helping nance it, represents the possibility of using the prototype as an access pavilion at the golf court in Sant Cugat.
The proposal consists of installing the prototype on the pitch & pu area at the golf club, on a cession of use regime. The golf club will pay for the services lease and will allow the temporary use of the prototype for research purposes as well as for environmental educa on on the Collserola Natural Park, next to the golf camp site.
Risc of social exclusionReturnable income: 1.000 € / 1.500 €Monthly rent: 125 € / 225 € + servicessingle 2/3 people
1 5 10 20 25 3015
34
JURY REPORTS
35(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
sustaiNability brieF report7
36
sustainability brief report77.1 Introduction
(e)co project deals with sustainability from a holistic point of view, approaching the current discussion about what is understood by sustainability: what criteria define it and how representative it is.
Regarding the prototype, (e)co´s aim is to close the life cycle of all elements. As elements, (e)co consider and treats with the same importance matter, water and energy.
Regarding energy, the basic objective is to produce more energy than it is consumed. This is the first thing done is to reduce energy demand. This is noticeable in the energy demand being of 2,880 kWh for heating and 2,926 kWh for cooling. This represents a savings of 75% and 2% respectively compared to standard housing.
As in the case of water, to close energy’s cycle, the first objective is to lower the demand. The following step is the production of energy by the prototype’s own means, i.e. to obtain a self-sufficient in energy prototype with the less consumption possible.
(e)co’s goal is to close the water cycle. On this purpose (e)co achieves to reduce fresh water consume to 40% of the total consume, it means 58 litres per person per day.
Regarding to construction materials, tha mass of (e)co is 164Kg/ m², while the average in Catalonia is 2793Kg/m². Energy production sum 2500MJ/m2 whereas the average in catalonia is 9070Mj/ m² and its associated emissions are 313,79kgCO2/ m², while in Catalonia are 732,5KgCo2/ m². (e)co dicreases 94% the weight per surface, 72% consuptiom of energy production and 50% of emissions with regard to the average in Catalonia.
Water cycle60% of water in house comes from grey and rain water
100% of the exterior skin is demountable for reuse100% of the interior is flexible
95% of the year under comfort ºt with passive strategies
Material cycle
Energy cycle
(e)quilibrio aMBIENTALEQUILIBRIO AMBIENTAL
El planeta tierra y sus recursos son finitos, la sostenibilidad consiste en no comprometer los recursos de las generaciones futuras por lo que la estrategia pasa por conseguir trabajar con ciclos de vida cerrados.
CICLO MATERIAL
Hoy en dia la vida de un recurso suele empezar por su extracción de la naturaleza, su posterior consumo y su muerte en forma de residuo. Los ciclos cerrados pretenden eliminar los residuos a través de la reutilización, el reciclaje o el retorno a la naturaleza.
naturaleza- consumo -residuo
Los materiales con los que se construye e)co responden a diferentes ciclos de vida. Una piel exterior industrializada y mecanizada que permite su desmontaje y reutilización. Módulos de madera cuyo ciclo de vida es totalmente renovable. Mobiliario reciclado y restaurado
HUELLA
RENOVAR
En el prototipo podemos distinguir dos tipos de materia, los materiales de construcción que dan forma al prototipo y los residuos generados tanto por su construcción, como por su uso y posterior deconstrucción.
Como materia, (e)co tiene una energía medible y unas emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero asociadas.
Nuestro objetivo es disminuir la cantidad de materia y su energía asociada, mediante una adecuada elección y optimización de los materiales y una correcta gestión de los residuos.
Para ello tenemos en cuenta el ciclo de vida de los materiales, desde la extracción de las materias primas hasta el fin de su vida útil.
Mass (Kg/m²)
Production Energy (MJ/m²)
Emissions (KgCO2/m²)
(e)co 163,89 2499,19 313,79
Buildings of Catalonia (CIES) 2792,8 9070,4 732,5
5ST-001
Structural Axonometric
5ST-001
Structural Axonometric
5ST-001
Structural Axonometric
naturaleza - consumo - reutilización renovación reciclaje La piel exterior del prototipo (e)co consiste en un invernader agrí-
cola estándard industrializado como los que podríamos encon-trar en cualquier campo de cultivo Español. Su industrialización y el hecho de tratarse de construcción 100% en seco, con uniones mecanizadas, permite facilmente su montaje y desmontaje, per-mitiendo así una posible reutilización.
Los módulos interiores de (e)co responden a una materialidad orgánica y biodegradable. La madera es un material renovable que mediante un proceso de producción y consumo controla-do puede lograr un impacto nulo en el medio ambiente.
naturaleza - consumo - reutilización naturaleza - consumo - renovación - naturaleza
Los módulos interiores de (e)co responden a una materialidad or-gánica y biodegradable. La madera es un material renovable que mediante un proceso de producción y consumo controlado pue-de llegar a lograr un impacto nulo en el medio ambiente.
Ciclo Material Ciclo del AguaREDUCIR REGENERARREAPROVECHAR
Una de las premisas de (e)co por lo que se refiere al ciclo del agua es la reducción del consumo. Para ello la estrategia principal es la reutilización del agua de lluvia y las agusa grises para determinados usos domésticos. Con ello se consigue que la casa ahorre un 70% de agua potable respecto a una vivienda estándard.
Consumo medio EspañaFuente: INE
Objetivo (e)co
120 l/dia
108 l/dia
50 l/dia
Consumo medio CataluñaFuente: ACA
Para reducir el consumo no nos conformamos con un cambio de hábitos por parte del usuario, (e)co trata las aguas grises y el agua pluvial mediante procesos de remediación y filtraje natural para conseguir una calidad de agua que permita utilizarla para determinados usos domésticos.
Una vez regeneradas las aguas grises que provienen de la lavadora, el lavabo, el lavavajillas o la ducha, se pueden reutilizar para algunos usos domésticos. El agua regenerada no utilizada se devuelve al medio a modo de recurso hídrico o bien se comparte con otros usuarios. El objetivo final es siempre cerrar el cilco del agua.
Greywaterrrrrrr
Regenerated greywater
Rain waterRe
generated rain water
RECICLAR
naturaleza - consumo - reciclaje
Materia
Agua: 58 l/p.diaEspaña : 140 l/p.dia
: 163,9 Kg/m2
España : 2792,8 Kg/m2
REUTILIZAR
Energia: 14 kw/m2
España : 64 kw/m2
1,5 Kg residuos/dia
ducharse 47%
wc 25%
lavadora 13%
lavarse dientes 8%
lavajillas 3%limpieza dientes 2%
beber 2%limpieza hogar 1%
Figure1.Key sustainability strategies
Figure2.The three different closed cycles that (e)co involves. Material, Water and Energy
JURY REPORTS
37(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
7.2 Energy Cycle - Bioclimatic Strategies
The bioclimatic strategy is determined by the global vision of the sustainability concept that the project promotes. We understand that one of the requisites of the project is reducing the energy demand and debating the comfort standards. (e)co’s design is conceived from its origin in response to the climate conditions, seeking to fully adapt to the surrounding environment. This reflects on how the climatic conditions (orientation, temperature, humidity, etc…) are taking into consideration in the house, intelligently responding to:
• House envelope, taking into account the level of insulation, air tightness, finishes and construction.
The design of the prototype is clearly linked to the bioclimatic strategy as we are talking about an element with an agricultural greenhouse structure and a part of its skin working as captor. This captor allows passing only the sun’s radiation light wave and does not let it leave once it comes to an infrared wave length because of the colliding with the interior elements. This is what is usually called the greenhouse effect. Another part of the skin is formed by materials that prevent solar radiation.
To produce the greenhouse effect at a satisfactory manner it is necessary for the prototype to ensure the air tightness. For this reason the outer skin acts like a boundary membrane between the inside and the outside, minimizing the infiltrations. The materials used will respond to the bioclimatic strategy. The outer envelope will allow to capture solar radiation in those places where its necessary. The inner envelope will help in reaching a thermal balance by controlling heat gains and losses. Besides, this envelope will be in charge of building up energy in order to free it later, diminishing thermal variations as much as possible.
• Glazing orientations, types and sizes. Solar protections to minimize the interior overheating. Daylight controls to provide evenly distributed and sufficient natural lighting.
The south facade acts as captor one, while the north is used for ventilation. The type and size of the holes is dimensioned to facilitate the ventilation of the house. The ventilation holes are concentrated in the north facade directing the wind to pass from a moist chamber, which results in the reduction of the air temperature. At the same time, there is a shadow mesh to avoid heating.
• Distribution of the interior spaces according their heating and cooling requirements, and the use of thermal buffers spaces.
The architectural design of the prototype and its spatial distribution are determined by the use of an intermediate space as a bioclimatic strategy. The climate control of this intermediate space is being realized in a passive manner, using the same building as a climate machine. This space, although it is not considered like an air-conditioned space in the competition, will be in a position of comfort during the 60% of the year. Furthermore, this space function is to serve as a climate cushion between the external and the space considered habitable and air-conditioned.
• Use of semi-passive systems to maximizes the effect of passive strategies with very low energy consumption.
As part of the prototype’s energy strategy to dissipate heat in summer and provide warmth in winter, auxiliary elements like a buffer tank of gravels are used. This tank produces inertia accumulating heat when an excess of heat is observed and then provided when its needed.
Figure3.Energy performance analysis
38
7.4 Material Cycle
Regarding matter, the model that prevails today is linear and based on “take-make-waste” model. (e)co considers essential to change this model and aims to make a cyclical one base on “borrow-use-return” sustainable model. We consider it an issue where the industry has a great role which is still anchored in the linear model.
First of all, our strategy is to reduce material usage. Thanks to the design stage optimization of the materials and to the careful selection of them, we have reduced by 92% the amount of water per m2 with respect to the average water consumption in Catalan buildings.
In order to achieve that, construction materials selection is taking into account that the materials used have to be able to be reincorporated into the industrial cycle or directly to the environment. They also have to be low embodied energy materials. Compared to the average building in Catalonia, (e)co is able to reduce 57% of the embodied energy per m2, and 43.8% of the greenhouse gases per m2.
In the cyclical model (e)co aims to eliminate waste. In order to achieve this, we used systems that allow a quick disassembly and thus facilitate the reuse and recycling, only 2.4% of the total mass ends up in the landfill, the rest is reused directly or recycled to make new components. The prototype’s furniture is a clear example of the philosophy “waste = food”. We have used elements considered waste by society and which we believe they are still useful for the same or for different function. Another example is the use of waste material from wood industry to manufacture the facilities cabinets.
When talking about waste, we miss the waste generated during the lifetime of the building and which can become 50 times greater than construction waste.
The first strategic action is to reduce the amount of material needed and which unfortunately convert into waste.
In the case of the organic materials, closing the cycle is transforming it in compost for the garden. That is why user’s habits are very important in this process; (e)co is only providing the facilities for an easy management.
0
Em
bodi
ed E
nerg
y (M
J/m
2)
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
0
Em
issi
ons
(KgC
O2/
m2)
100
200
300
400
Mass(Kg/m2)
Energy(MJ/m2)
Emissions(KgCO2/m2)
216,
3
202,
19
2.79
2,8
3.88
9,9
4.97
0,63
9.07
0,4
411,
6 895,
34
732,
5 Mas
s (K
g/m
2)
(e)co Low3 Average Buildings in CataloniaFigure4.Comparison with other buildings (graphic)
JURY REPORTS
39(e)co team UPC SDE 2012www.solardecathlon.upc.edu/2012http://www.sdeurope.org
7.3 Water Cycle
In (e)co prototype the water cycle is closed reducing the consume of drinking water to the maximum. A reduction of 60% can be achieved by our strategy. The solution proposed is technically as well as economically plausible. Moreover, it strongly supports sustainability in the use of natural technologies and closing the water cycle.
The strategy consists of recovering rain water and greywater, and treating them to get two qualities of water. Both qualities meet as minimum the health standards for bathing water. Therefore, both water types can be used inside the dwelling for several applications that do not involve drinking. For example: irrigation, washing machine, dishwasher, even hand washing and shower.
(e)co’s water treatment is a standard potabilisation process of depuration and disinfection.
The rainwater treatment consists of a first phase of elimination of solids through a sieve, followed by disinfection with chlorine tablets.
The grey water is recycled by removing suspended solids by decantation, followed by a secondary treatment which removes organic matter and nutrients through an artificial wetland, which is a totally natural process. The third treatment is a disinfection.
All treated water is continuously being recirculated, so that it does not standstill in the tank. The pH and the amount of chlorine needed to maintain a concentration of 1ppm of residual chlorine is automatically controlled. It could also be stored for several days.
In order that the responsibility to where using the different qualities of water rests on the user, (e)co provides for the dwelling 3 types of water: drinking water (hot and cold), rainwater and recycled gray water. This is achieved by a perimeter ring, surrounding the house, from which each type of water has an independent system.
This is the innovative part proposed by (e)co, a system that does not respond to a standard but it serves any need that arises. (e)co anticipates the current regulations based on the supply of only drinking water quality inside the house, and makes the user responsible for the proper use of the water cycle, from treatment to the final stage.
By using the proper quality of water for each type of use allows us to save drinking water (from 144l/p.d to <58l/p.d) and therefore all the energy that is associated to its treatment.
(e)co achieves a sustainable water cycle that can be easily implemented by users willing to adapt their lifestyle to a new social demand based on sustainability.
Figure6.Water Budget for a 3 adult use of (e)co
Extra uses17455l/year
Dishwasher 2,600l/year
Hands8,500l/year
Kitchen sink & drink 8,000l/year
Shower+Sink 54,000l/year
3 adults water use in one year
Extra DW use
WC30000l/year
Laundry 113,500l/year
Sink+Shower62,500l/year
Cleaning 500l/year
Garden35,500l/year
RW 46,500l/year
GW 76,000 l/year
WC30,000l/year
DW 62,000 l/year
BW 36,000 l/year
e0
year
wetlands
Laundry 113,500l/year
adults wat
RW Rain waterGW Gray waterACS Net cold water ACS Net hot water
1 Solar Panel2 Wetlands3 Rain water deposits 4 Installation ring
1 Water access2 Conection to modules at any point
1 Waste grey water2 Grey water purifica-tion in wetland
1.
3.5.
2.
4.
2.
2.
2.1.
1.
1.
1. 2.
1.
1.
Figure5.Water collection
top related