dramatic introduction!

Post on 24-Feb-2016

43 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Dramatic introduction!. OVERFISHING OF ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA ( Thunnus thynnus ). Implications and Conservation Strategies Nick Gezon, Linda Isakson, Laura Pratt, and Alex Lee. GENERAL OVERFISHING. 16.6% of animal protein consumed $80 billion/ year industry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Dramatic introduction!

OVERFISHING OF ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA(Thunnus thynnus)

Implications and Conservation StrategiesNick Gezon, Linda Isakson, Laura Pratt, and Alex Lee

• 16.6% of animal protein consumed

• $80 billion/year industry

• Employs ~750 million people worldwide• Catch peaked in late 1990s at 90 million tonnes, now at 77

million tonnes as a result of exploitation• Bottom-trawling, dredges, traps have damaged or altered

95% of marine habitats

• 85% of global fish stocks depleted

• Illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) main culprit

GENERAL OVERFISHING

ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA OVERFISHING

• 61% of tunas are either overexploited or fully exploited worldwide

• Used as dog food prior to 1950s, then technology improved delivery

• Use in sushi and sashimi exploded market from 20,000 tonnes/yr harvest to over 80,000 tonnes/yr at peak.

• Western Atlantic population reduced to 17% of 1950's biomass

• Eastern Atlantic population reduced to 33% of 1950's biomass

Western Atlantic or Gulf of Mexico stock

Eastern Atlantic or Mediterranean Sea stock

*Horizontal dashed lines represent the stock biomass necessary for maximum sustainable yield.

ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA OVERFISHING

ECOSYSTEM IMPLICATIONS

• Bluefin Tuna are apex predators in the Atlantic pelagic ecosystem.

• They feed on mackerel, squid, herring, and sardines.• They have a top-down effect on the food web controlling

prey populations.• Overfishing of bluefin tuna has caused populations of prey

to become unstable (Boom and Bust Cycles)• This threatens the health of the whole ecosystem. • A study assessing the risks for global fisheries health

found that changes in lower trophic level prey fish populations pose the greatest threat to fisheries collapse (Pinsky et al. 2011)

ECOSYSTEM IMPLICATIONS

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE

• High Demand with depleting populations– The Japanese Market

• Annually 500 million USD

– Prices average $100K

– Fish at breeding locations• Ricardo Fuentes makes annually 220 million USD

ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS

• IUU: Illegal, unregulated, unreported fishing

• The Japanese Market– Estimates 6-7 billion USD over last

20 years

• Catching undersized fish

• Misreporting number caught

• Fishing in unregulated waters (North Africa)

IUU FISHING

• Recreational fishing in Haterras region, North Carolina– Emerged in 1996– For financial gain– Condition of capturing one legal-sized tuna

• Survey found Hatteras Fishery made 5 million USD

SPORTFISHING

Kayak Angler unlawfully catches a bluefin tuna

SPORTFISHING

• ICCAT created in 1969 to regulate bluefin harvesting

• 40 years later, bluefin still in decline• IUU fishing still rampant but more stringent measures are

being taken

• Proposal to list T. thynnus under CITES rejected

• Recently adopted 13,500 tonnes limit for 2013

ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA OVERFISHING

• Current:– Aquaculture– the farming of bluefin tuna

• CleanSeas Aquaculture Growout

– Spawning Sanctuaries• Protected habitats

– Gulf of Mexico

CONSERVATION MEASURES

• Problems:– There is a significant amount of IUU (illegal,

unreported, unregulated)– Bluefin are not optimal fish to farm– Biomass is so low that it’s hard to bounce back

with continued fishing– Little international cooperation

• Because of adverse affects on economy and culture

CONSERVATION MEASURES

• The future:– Continue placing regulations and bans upon

fishing– Encourage international compliance

• Trade embargos• Onboard monitors for IUU

– Develop new methods of aquaculture

CONSERVATION MEASURES

RAISE AWARENESS!

• Bohnsack, B.L., Ditton, R.B., Stoll, J.R., Chen, R.J., Novak, R., Smutko, L.S. 2002. The economic impacts of the recreational bluefin tuna fishery in Hatteras, North Carolina. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. Vol 22, Issue 1, p165-176.

• Center for Public Integrity. 2012. The black market in bluefin tuna. http://www.publicintegrity.org/2010/11/07/2335/overview-black-market-bluefin

• Ellis, R. 2008. The bluefin in peril. Scientific American. Vol 298, p70-77.• Ezzy, E., Scarborough, H., Wallis, A. 2012. Recreational value of southern bluefin tuna fishing.

Economic Papers: A Journal of applied economics and policy. Vol 31(2), p150-159.• Fromentin, J.M., Powers, J.E. 2005. Atlantic bluefin tuna: population dynamics, ecology, fisheries and

management. Fish and Fisheries. Vol 6, p281-306.• International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. Statistical Bulletin 40, 1960-2009.

July 2011.• Kato, Dawn, M. 2011. The Battle for Bluefin: The Consumers Role in Preserving the Atlantic Bluefin

Tuna. California Western International Law Journal. Vol 42, Issue 1, p149-188.• Pinsky M.L., Jensen O.P.,Ricard D., Palumbi S.R. 2011 Unexpected patterns of fisheries collapse in the

world’s oceans. PNAS Ecology • Polachek, Tom. 2012. Assessment of IUU fishing for Southern Bluefin Tuna. Marine Policy. Vol 36,

p1150–1165. • United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. 2012. The Future We Want: Oceans. Rio+20

Factsheet.

SOURCES

top related