disaster and climate risk management new edited...management in both nati onal and local government...
Post on 21-Jun-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Disaster and Climate Risk Managementand Capacity Assessment | i
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk ManagementCapacity Assessment and Plan in Uganda
August 2014
Disaster and Climate Risk Managementand Capacity Assessment | i
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Table of contentsList of Abbreviati ons and Acronyms.................................................................................................iii
Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................iv
Executi ve Summary..........................................................................................................................v
1.0 Introducti on.........................................................................................................................1
2.0 Purpose, Aims and Objecti ves of the D/CRM Capacity Assessment........................................ 4
3.0 Methods...............................................................................................................................4
4.0 Main Findings………………………………………………………………...………..............................................8
4.1 Background Characteristi cs of Respondents and Insti tuti ons.................................................8
4.2 Enabling Environment Capacity..............................................................................................9
4.3 Organizati onal Level Capacity..................................................................................................10
4.4 Individual Level Capacity........................................................................................................17
4.5 Crosscutti ng Issues relati ng to D/CRM Capacity..................................................................18
5.0 Lessons Learned.....................................................................................................................21
6.0 Challenges.............................................................................................................................22
7.0 Overall Recommendati ons.....................................................................................................23
8.0 Conclusions............................................................................................................................25
Part 2: Capacity Development Plan for Disaster Risk Management, Uganda 2015-2020..............28
Annexes
Annex 1: Data Collecti on Instruments............................................................................................56
Annex 1.1 Questi onnaire................................................................................................................56
Annex 1.2 Key Informant Interview Guide........................................................................................63
Annex 2: List of Respondents and Insti tuti ons..............................................................................65
Annex 3: List of Parti cipants, Validati on Workshop.........................................................................66
Annex 4: List of Parti cipants, Disseminati on Workshop..................................................................67
Annex 5: List of Documents Reviewed.............................................................................................68
Annex 6: Hyogo Framework of Acti on, 2005-2015..........................................................................69
ii | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity Assessment
The Office of the Prime Minister
List of Figures
Figure 1: Typology Of Natural Hazards in Africa 1
Figure 2: Components of Disaster Risk Management 2
Figure 3: Hyogo Framework for Acti on 2005-2015 3
Figure 4: Enabling Environmental Capacity 9
Figure 5: Organizati onal Level Capacity 11
Figure 6: Preparedness Capacity 12
Figure 7: Miti gati on Capacity 14
Figure 8: Response Capacity 16
Figure 9: Rehabilitati on/Recovery capacity 16
Figure 10: Organizati onal Level Cross Cutti ng Issues 19
List of TablesTable 1: Background of Respondents and Insti tuti ons 8
Table 2: Individual Level Capacity 17
Disaster and Climate Risk Managementand Capacity Assessment | iii
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms BCP Business Conti nuity PlanCBOs Community-Based Organizati onCCA Climate Change Adapti onCCM Climate Change Miti gati onCDF Capacity Development FrameworkCP Conti ngency PlansCSO Civil Society Organizati onCRM Climate Risk ManagementDDMC District Disaster Management Committ eeDRC Disaster Risk Conti ngencyDRM Disaster Risk ManagementD/CRMCA Disaster/Climate Risk Management Capacity AssessmentDRP Disaster Risk PreparednessDRR Disaster Risk Reducti onEWS Early Warning Systems FAO Food and Agricultural Organizati onGIS Geographical Informati on SystemGPS Global Positi oning SystemHVCA Hazards, Vulnerability and Capacity AssessmentIK Indigenous KnowledgeIIRR Insti tute for Internati onal Rural Reconstructi onIMS Informati on Management SystemINGO Internati onal Non-Governmental Organizati onIOM Internati onal Organizati on for Migrati onIT Informati on TechnologyKCCA Kampala City Council AuthorityMAAIF Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industries and FisheriesM&E Monitoring and Evaluati onMoH Ministry of HealthMUK Makerere University KampalaMUSPH Makerere University School of Public HealthMWE Ministry of Water and EnvironmentNECOC Nati onal Emergency Coordinati on and Operati ng CentreNGO Non-Governmental Organizati onNPA Nati onal Planning AuthorityOPM Offi ce of the Prime MinisterSOP Standard Operati ng ProceduresSWOT Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and ThreatsULGA Uganda Local Governments Associati onUN United Nati onsUNDP United Nati ons Development ProgrammeUNFPA United Nati ons Populati on FundsUNICEF United Nati ons Children’s FundURCS Uganda Red Cross SocietyWASH Water Sanitati on and Hygiene WFP World Food ProgrammeWHO World Health Organizati on
iv | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity Assessment
The Office of the Prime Minister
AcknowledgementsThis Disaster Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment (D/CRMCA) was conducted between December 2013 and April 2014. This study was expanded from the initi al capacity assessment conducted by the World Health Organisati on (WHO) in Uganda, much as it was focusing on the health sector.
During the D/CRMCA, enormous support was given to our team by UNDP, the Offi ce of the Prime Minister, Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management, WHO and the Disaster Risk Reducti on Nati onal Platf orm Members in Uganda. We would like to thank all those who parti cipated in the study and all those who took part in the two workshops, validati on and disseminati on. We sincerely hope that the fi ndings, conclusions and recommendati ons originati ng from this report will assist your organizati ons/insti tuti ons in the conti nued Disaster Risk Management eff orts in Uganda.
We would like to especially thank Mr. Jose Neil A. C. Manzano (Disaster Risk Management Advisor) and Mr. Gilbert Anguyo (Disaster Risk Reducti on Analyst) from UNDP, Ms. Rose Nakabugo, Acti ng Commissioner for Disaster Preparedness and Management from the Offi ce of the Prime Minister and Dr. Michael Lukwiya and Dr. Solomon Fisseha from WHO for their professional and constructi ve guidance during the assessment.
We are also grateful to all the respondents for the ti me they took to complete the questi onnaire, for accepti ng to be interviewed as well as to those who parti cipated in the stakeholder meeti ngs.
Finally we thank the members of the research team for the eff orts in the data collecti on and analysis. The team comprised;Prof Christopher G Orach MB ChB, MMed, MPH, PhD Team LeaderMr. Lazarus Ocira BA, MA ConsultantDr. Lynn Atuyambe BA, MPH, PhD ConsultantMr. Henry Komakech BA, MHSR ResearcherDr. David Lubogo MB ChB, MPH Researcher
Dr Christopher Garimoi Orach Mr. Lazarus OciraLead Consultant Associate Consultant
Disaster and Climate Risk Managementand Capacity Assessment | v
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Executive Summary
Background
Uganda has registered several incidences of both natural and manmade disasters. The eff ects of the disasters have been profound on the people, their livelihood and the economy of the country. Management of disasters especially those compounded by climati c changes has been adhoc and there are hardly any preparedness measures in place to miti gate eff ects of the disasters. The Offi ce of the Prime Minister with support from the United Nati ons Development Programme (UNDP) commissioned the Disaster and Climate Risk Management (D/CRM) capacity assessment from De-cember 2013 to April 2014 to guide the development on D/CRM.
Objecti ves
The overall goal of the assessment was to identi fy the key gaps and strengths in D/CRM capacity of the country with a view of addressing and strengthening those D/CRM capacity gaps.
Methods
The country disaster risk management capacity assessment was conducted using a mix of methods. Quanti tati ve and qualitati ve data were collected through review of existi ng documents, key informant interviews, observati on, and stakeholder meeti ng/workshop. The UNDP capacity development framework was adapted and used for the collecti on and analysis of quanti tati ve and qualitati ve data. The researchers were trained and the study instruments pretested. Qualitati ve data were analyzed using content analysis while SPSS and Excel computer packages were used to analyse quanti tati ve data.
Key Findings
Enabling Environment
The study shows that overall, the capacity for enabling environment for D/CRM is considered high for Advocacy rated 3.6, D/CRM policy development rated 3.6 and stakeholder engagement/networking rated 3.5, respecti vely. However, capacity was considered low in the areas of D/CRM budgetary allocati on and appropriate use rated 2.6, functi onal operati ng procedures rated 2.7, research rated 2.8, as well as Monitoring and Evaluati on of D/CRM acti viti es rated 2.9.
Organizati on Level Capacity
At the organizati onal level, capacity was considered high for preparedness rated 3.3, response capacity rated 3.1 and rehabilitati on/recovery capacity rated 3.0 respecti vely. However capacity was considered low in the domain of miti gati on rated 2.9. Under miti gati on domain, capacity was low for risk transfers mechanisms rated 2.2, environmental resource management rated 2.6 and livelihoods resilience and community based disaster risk reducti on (DRR) rated 2.7. Under rehabilitati on/recovery, capacity was low in the area of resett lement initi ati ve rated 2.7, and in the preparedness domain, capacity was rated low in the areas of conti ngency planning rated 2.9, early warning rated
vi | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity Assessment
The Office of the Prime Minister
3.0 and human resource training rated 3.0. There is inadequate human capacity and skills in D/CRM in local governments and high reliance on the capaciti es of internati onal humanitarian organizati ons and non-government organizati ons. There are inadequate fi nancial resources for Climate Risk Management in both nati onal and local government levels compounded by the limited availability of equipment, e.g. functi onal automati c weather stati ons, to facilitate disaster and climate risk management. Individual Level Capacity
At the individual level, capacity was rated high for availability of staff with knowledge and skills for preparedness rated 3.3 as well as staff with knowledge and skills in response rated 3.3. Overall, human resource availability for D/CRM interventi ons was rated lower 3.1 compared to staff with knowledge and skills rated 3.3.
Conclusions
The study has revealed several gaps and challenges on D/CRM in the country. Under the enabling environment, the domains with the most inadequacies include budgetary allocati on/funding, lack of standard operati ng procedures (SOP) and inadequate monitoring and evaluati on of D/CRM interventi ons.
At the organizati onal level, under preparedness, inadequacies exist in the domain of conti ngency planning, early warning and human resources skilled in D/CRM; under miti gati on inadequacies exist in the areas of (risk transfer mechanisms, microfi nance, inadequate equipment, livelihoods resilience; and under response, there is need to strengthen emergency response eff orts and fi nally under rehabilitati on there are gaps in establishing rehabilitati on initi ati ves.
At the individual level, inadequacies exist in the availability of qualifi ed staff in the fi eld of D/CRM. The main challenges identi fi ed in D/CRM interventi ons were in the areas of limited resource allocati on/funding, limited equipment, low capacity for early warning and response; inadequate human resource capaciti es coupled with staff turnover in insti tuti ons.
The multi plicity of inadequacies in capaciti es suggest the need for government (at central and local levels) and stakeholders to invest in strengthening capaciti es in the various domains of D/CRM (enabling environment, organizati onal and individual levels) for eff ecti ve disaster and climate risk management in the country.
Recommendati ons
Enabling Environment
The study has shown that there is low capacity for budgetary allocati on, Standard Operati on Procedures (SOP), and for Monitoring and Evaluati on of D/CRM. Hence, there is need for government and development partners (stakeholders) to increase funding/budgetary allocati on for D/CRM interventi ons, increase staff availability and capacity through provision of appropriate training opportuniti es, ensure use of SOP, and promote monitoring and evaluati on of D/CRM interventi ons.
Disaster and Climate Risk Managementand Capacity Assessment | vii
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Organizati on Level Capacity
Several organizati onal level capacity gaps were identi fi ed. Under miti gati on, capacity was low for risk transfers mechanisms and environmental resource management, livelihoods resilience and community based DRR. There is need, therefore, to strengthen various community livelihood resilience capaciti es including through community sensiti zati on, income generati on and saving schemes, establishment of by laws against environmental degradati on, enforcement of policies on environmental protecti on and establishment of functi onal DRR structures at community level.
Under preparedness, there is need to develop multi -hazard conti ngency plans and business conti nuity plans.
In the realm of response, there is need to strengthen capacity through the acquisiti on of appropriate equipment for search and rescue and response, training on emergency response and acti vati on of the incident command centre at nati onal level i.e. Nati onal Emergency Coordinati on Operati on Centre (NECOC).
Under rehabilitati on/recovery, capacity was low in the area of resett lement initi ati ve. There is need to plan for durable soluti on/exit plan for recovery by empowering communiti es, allocati ng budget for recovery rehabilitati on, and working with communiti es to implement recovery plans.
Individual Level Capacity
There is need to build human resource capacity through appropriate specialized graduate level training. Furthermore, professional courses in specialized D/CRM fi elds should be organised. Gov-ernment should provide funding to support Universiti es to conduct further specialized trainings and research in the fi eld of D/CRM.
viii | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity Assessment
The Office of the Prime Minister
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 1
1.1 Background and Situati on Analysis
Globally, major disasters linked to natural phenomena are on the increase. According to EM-AT/CRED, fl oods have been the major cause of disasters with an esti mated 94,850,811 people aff ected, followed by drought with 75,489,671 persons aff ected since 2009-2010.
In Africa, the leading causes of disasters are fl oods 27%, drought 18% and a combinati on of epidemics, famine and insect infestati on leading to 39% of the disasters on the conti nent as illustrated in fi gure 1 below.
Figure 1: Typology of natural hazards in Africa
Source: ICSU-ROA 2007
Uganda has registered various incidences of both natural and manmade disasters. These disasters have had profound health and socio-economic impacts. Several areas in Uganda are prone to various types of hazards. The Mt. Elgon and Mt. Ruwenzori sub-region are prone to landslides, fl oods and Seismic acti viti es. The Karamoja sub-region in north eastern Uganda is prone to drought and famine. The Acholi, Lango and West Nile sub-region are just recovering from over 20 years of civil war which led to internal displacement of over 2 million people. Civil unrest in the neighbouring countries of Kenya, South Sudan, Rwanda, Somalia and the Democrati c Republic of Congo (DRC) has led to the infl ux of over 200,000 refugees who are currently living in Uganda. Terrorist att ack by the Al-Shabaab in 2010 resulted into the death of over 75 people, with several others permanently disabled.
1.0 Introduction
Typology of natural hazards in Africa
Drought18%
39%
0.3%0.6%3%
9%1.1%
1.3%
27%
0.7%Epidemic, Famine, Insects
Tsunami
Volcano
Earthquake
Windstorm
Wild Fires
Slides
Flood
Extreme temperature
The Office of the Prime Minister
2 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
In additi on, Uganda lies within the Yellow Fever and Meningiti s epidemic belt. Uganda has also recorded epidemics of various disease including Viral heamorhagic fever (Ebola and Marburg) and Cholera, Hepati ti s E, Yellow Fever, Meningiti s, Polio and Measles outbreaks over the last 10 years.
The management of these disasters has been adhoc. There are hardly any preparedness measures in place to miti gate the eff ects of the disasters. Disaster risk management is defi ned as the systemati c process of using administrati ve directi ves, organizati ons, and operati onal skills and capaciti es to implement strategies, politi cal and improved coping capaciti es in order to lessen the adverse impacts of hazards and the possibility of disaster. Disaster risk management comprises several components including preparedness, miti gati on, preventi on, response rehabilitati on and recovery, as illustrated in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2: Components of Disaster Risk Management
Eff ecti ve disaster and climate risk management contributes towards the building of resilience of nati ons and communiti es to disasters. The Hyogo framework 2005-2015 underscored the need for, and identi fi ed ways of, building the resilience of nati ons and communiti es to disasters. Five priority acti ons illustrated below in the global Hyogo Framework for Acti on 2005-2015 are linked to Disaster Risk Management. (Refer to Annex 7)
Prevention
Rehabilitation
Recovery Response
Preparedness
Mitigation
DRM
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 3
Figure 3: Hyogo Framework for Acti on 2005-2015
The Offi ce of the Prime Minister (OPM) in collaborati on with United Nati ons Development Programme (UNDP) and World Health Organisati on (WHO) country offi ce commissioned a study to assess D/CRM Capacity in Uganda in order to identi fy gaps and strengths that guide the development of the D/CRM Capacity Development Plan. The study was conducted from December 2013 to April 2014.
The Office of the Prime Minister
4 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
2.0 Purpose, Aims and Objectives of the D/CRM Capacity Assessment
2.1 The Purpose
To identi fy the key gaps and strengths in D/CRM capacity of the country with a view to strengthening D/CRM capacity so as to contribute to the reducti on in disaster and climate risks as well as economic loss and social disrupti ons.
2.2 The Aims and Objecti ves
• To identi fy, map and document all the stakeholders in D/CRM and their capaciti es;• Identi fy gaps in D/CRM implementati on in the country;• Develop a road map with cost for strengthening D/CRM; and• Agree on way forward, ti meliness and responsibility for Uganda
3.0 Methods
3.1 Study Design
This was a cross-secti onal study. The assessment focussed on the present status and circumstances of insti tuti ons dealing with D/CRM in the country. Both quanti tati ve and qualitati ve techniques were used in data collecti on.
3.2 Study Populati on
The study populati on consisted of stakeholders working in the fi eld of D/CRM, Climate Change Adapti on, emergency response and community resilience and livelihoods. They comprised programme managers and offi cers of government ministries and departments, local governments-districts and authoriti es, United Nati ons (UN) agencies, internati onal non-governmental organizati ons (NGOs), universiti es, research insti tuti ons, local NGOs, private sector, the media and Civil Society Organisati ons (CSOs). (Refer to the list of respondents in Annex 2)
3.3 Data Collecti on Techniques
The data were collected using both quanti tati ve and qualitati ve techniques. The main techniques of data collecti on used included review of documents, key informant interviews, and stakeholder meeti ngs as sti pulated in secti ons 3.3.1 - 3.3.3 below. Data collecti on instruments were pretested.
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 5
3.3.1 Review of Existi ng Documents
Review of key documents was conducted. The key documents reviewed pertained to disaster risk reducti on (DRR) and climate change adaptati on (CCA) strategic framework; monitoring and evaluati ons frameworks, UNDP capacity assessment framework, nati onal D/CRM policies, WHO D/CRM assessment report, Uganda Red Cross strategic plan, Uganda local government Associati on Working paper on DRR among many. (Refer to Annex 5).
3.3.2 Key Informant Interviews
Key informant interviews were conducted. The categories of key stakeholders interviewed included heads of insti tuti ons and D/CRM focal persons in the following organizati on; government ministries, UN agencies, Internati onal NGO, local government and Civil Society Organizati ons (CSOs) as sti pulated in secti on 2.2.1 above 3.1. Key informant interviews used key informant interview guide (See KII guide – Annex1.2). 3.3.3 Stakeholder Meeti ngs
Two validati on workshops were held with stakeholders. The meeti ng was designed as an approach/technique to collect more data and informati on on D/CRM. Furthermore, the meeti ng was used to get feedback on the preliminary fi ndings (Refer to the list of stakeholders during the validati on workshop Annex 3). The parti cipants were invited from government ministries, UN agencies, INGOs, local NGOs, private sector, Academia, media and CSOs.
Validati on D/CRMCA workshop organised by OPM and supported by UNDP
The Office of the Prime Minister
6 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
3.3.4 Observati ons
Observati ons were carried out in various insti tuti ons/organizati ons to check for capacity in terms of availability of equipments for response, warehouses/stores for stock piling food and non-food items for disaster risk management.
3.4 Study Instruments
Two study instruments, qualitati ve and qualitati ve, were used. The quanti tati ve instrument was adapted from the UNDP capacity assessment framework.
Quanti tati ve tool: We used questi onnaires to collect quanti tati ve data. (Refer to the questi onnaire sample in Annex 1.1).
Qualitati ve tool: Key informant interview guide was used to get the percepti ons of respondents regarding D/CRMCA. This was complemented in the conduct of observati on using a checklist and held stakeholder meeti ngs. (Refer to Key informant interview guide in Annex 2.2; and list of parti cipants in the Validati on and Disseminati on Workshops, Annexes 3 and 4 respecti vely).
Assistant Commissioner addressing the meeti ng, Mr Gilbert Anguyo of UNDP on the extreme left . Dr Chris Garimoi Lead Consultant in the middle and Mr. Laz Ocira, Associate Consultant on the extreme right
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 7
3.5 Data Management and Analysis
3.5.1 Data Management
To ensure quality in data collecti on, researchers were trained and the instruments pre-tested. The quanti tati ve data collected were checked for completeness, cleaned and captured. Data entry was carried out in Excel spreadsheet. 3.5.2 Data Analysis
The qualitati ve data were transcribed and analysed according to themes using a master sheet. Quanti tati ve data were analyzed using an excel computer package. Quanti tati ve data collecti on instrument was designed according to a rati ng system from 1-5 where 1=Very low, 2=Low, 3=Moderate, High=4 and 5=Very High. Rates were computed for the various variables under each capacity domain.
3.6 Limitati ons
The study had some limitati ons. These included;
1. Reluctance by organizati ons to expose their capacity status;2. Some focal persons were not available, but in the fi eld responding to ongoing emergencies.
The Office of the Prime Minister
8 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
4.0 Main FindingsThe fi ndings of the study are presented in fi ve secti ons. In the fi rst, secti on 5.1, the background of the respondents and their insti tuti ons were presented. In the second secti on 5.2, the fi nding on the Enabling Environment Capacity for DC RM is presented. The third secti on 5.3 addresses the Organisati onal Capacity level and the Individual level Capacity is presented in the fourth secti on 5.4. In the fi nal secti on, 5.5 cross cutti ngs issues are presented and discussed.
4.1 Background Characteristi cs of Respondents and Insti tuti ons
Table 1: Background of Respondents and their Insti tuti ons
Respondents Frequency Percentage
Characteristi cs (n=47) (%)Positi onProgramme Assistants 9 19.1Programme Offi cers 11 23.4Lecturers 3 6.4Managers 24 51.1
SexMale 30 63.8Female 17 36.2
Qualifi cati onBachelors 6 12.7Masters 39 83P h D s 2 4.3
Organizati on /Insti tuti onINGO 5 10.6Local NGO 6 12.8UN Agency 9 19.1Ministry 14 29.9Local government 9 19.2Academic Insti tuti on/University 9 19.1
Keys: INGO=Internati onal non-governmental organizati on; UN= United Nati ons
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 9
The majority of respondents 51.1% is comprised of Managers and 23% of Programme Offi cers. The test is comprised of lecturers 6.4% and assistants 19.1%.
Two thirds of respondents 64.8% were males, 36.2% were females. Most respondents (83.0%) have a Masters Degree. About a third 29.9% were from Ministries including OPM and Health, 23.4% were from either an INGO or local NGO, 19.1% were from UN agencies including UNDP, WFP,WHO, UNFPA, IOM and UNICEF. Similarly, 19.1% were from local governments.
4.2 Enabling Environment Capacity
Figure 4: Enabling Environment Capacity
The study show that, within the Enabling Environment, advocacy was rated highest at 3.6, followed by capacity to develop D/CRM policies and frameworks at 3.6 and stakeholders’ engagement/networking rated 3.5. Capacity was found to be low for budgetary allocati on for D/CRM rated at 2.6, functi onal Standard Operati ng Procedure (SOP) rated 2.8 and Monitoring and Evaluati on rated at 2.9. Budgets being used appropriately rated at 2.6 and research work on D/CRM rated at 2.8.
Strengths
The enabling environment for D/CRM domain, capacity is considered highest for Advocacy rated 3.6, Policy and frameworks development rated 3.6, and Stakeholder engagement and networking rated 3.5. The reasons for these fi ndings are because advocacy and stakeholder engagement are relati vely easy for several implementi ng partners given the existence of the DRR nati onal platf orm where
Rat
e
3.6
2.6
3.6
2.8
3.5
2.8 2.9
Capac
ity to
develo
p DRM polic
ies
DRM Budget
is all
ocated
and use
d appro
priatel
y
Advoca
cy ca
pacity
Functional
standard
operatin
g proce
dures
Stakeh
older en
gagem
ent
Resea
rch done o
n DRM/C
CA
Functional
M & E M
echan
ism fo
r DRM
54.5
43.5
32.5
21.5
10.5
0
Elements of Enabling Environment capacity
The Office of the Prime Minister
10 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
several stakeholders regularly meet and engage. Similarly, there exist nati onal policies on D/CRM, however, the main challenge is usually in ensuring eff ecti ve implementati on, as well as, monitoring them using appropriate instruments.
Inadequacies
The study has revealed that D/CRM capacity is considered low in several areas. Budgetary allocati on and appropriate use for D/CRM was rated low 2.6. Financial allocati on for disaster and climate risk management is generally allocated a relati vely low budget by government insti tuti ons and partners. This may be due to low prioriti zati ons of the interventi ons and challenged in the appropriate use of these funds in some public offi ces and by partners. This implies the need for more transparency and accountability by all stakeholders.
Functi onal SOP was rated at 2.8. This suggests that only just over half of the stakeholder groups consulted have existi ng standard operati ng procedures, yet the availability of and functi onality of SOPs is criti cal in guiding quality disaster and climate risk management interventi ons. It is important and recommended that standard operati ng procedures are developed, shared and used by stakeholders in any disaster and climate risk management setti ngs.
Research on D/CRM and CCA was rated 2.8. The rather low rati ng of research in the area of D/CRM is not surprising. Research is an expensive undertaking; in additi on, it’s oft en the mandate of academic and research insti tuti ons. Adequate fi nances should be devoted for and the appropriate organizati ons supported and commissioned to undertake appropriate and relevant researches in the domains of D/CRM.
Monitoring and Evaluati on mechanisms were rated low at 2.9. According to several stakeholders, for many implementi ng partners, while monitoring their work is oft en carried out, evaluati on of the work is rarely done. The reasons for this include lack of planning for evaluati on including the fi nancing of the evaluati on.
Acti on Points
The acti ons points below are considered eff ecti ve if all stakeholders work together in a more coordinated fashion:• Budgetary allocati on towards D/CRM being the lowest at 2.6 in terms of Enabling Environment
rati ng should draw much att enti on by increasing mobilizati on eff orts for funds at all levels.• Develop and ensure SOP is developed and used to guide acti ons/interventi ons in D/CRM based
on the fi ndings from this study which is rated at 2.8. • Research and knowledge development should be encouraged and supported by key stakeholders
in the areas of D/CRM/CCA to facilitate evidence-based advocacy among other interventi ons.• Strengthen mechanisms for monitoring and evaluati on of D/CRM interventi ons at all levels with
harmonized tools.
4.3 Organizati onal Level Capacity
The study shows that at the organizati onal level, capacity for preparedness and response are higher, rated at 3.3 and 3.1 respecti vely compared to capacity for miti gati on and rehabilitati on rated 2.7 and 3.0 respecti vely in the country.
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 11
Figure 5: Organizati onal Level Capacity
Strengths
At the organizati onal level, capacity for preparedness for D/CRM was considered highest rated at 3.3. Within the preparedness domain capacity for awareness creati on was the most highly rated at 3.3. This is because of the relati ve ease to undertake element--dness such as awareness creati on which requires relati vely litt le resource investment compared to the other interventi ons e.g. response, human resources training which are more resource intensive.
Capacity for response was also rated high 3.1. This may be att ributed to the fact that several stakeholders including – UN agencies and internati onal NGO have the fi nancial resources or they can easily mobilize funds in the event of any disasters to mount appropriate and eff ecti ve response/interventi ons.
Inadequacies
The study shows that at organizati onal level, miti gati on capacity was rated lowest while under the miti gati on domain, risk transfer mechanisms/micro-insurance rated 2.2 and environmental resource management rated 2.6 exhibited the widest gaps. This may because specifi c risk transfer mechanisms/micro-credit schemes may not be easy to implement in the aff ected communiti es. In additi on, environmental resource management interventi ons may be challenging to implement due to lack of policies and the enactment of the necessary and appropriate laws to enforce their implementati on.
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
3.3
Rat
e
Preparedness capacity Mitigation capacity
Elements of Organisational level Capacity
Response capacity Rehabilitation capacity
2.93.2
3
The Office of the Prime Minister
12 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Figure 6: Preparedness Capacity
Under preparedness domain, the capacity for awareness creati on is considered highest, rated 3.3 however conti ngency planning was rated lowest at 2.9.
Strengths
Awareness creati on was found to be the area where there exists highest capacity under the domain of preparedness. The explanati on why awareness creati on is considered highly is because of the relati ve ease of conducti ng it compared to the other elements of preparedness which are more resource intensive and demanding.
Inadequacies
The main areas of defi ciencies in the realm of preparedness were reported in the domains of conti ngency planning rated 2.9, early warning rated 3.0 and human resources training rated 3.0. Conti ngency planning was considered a weak area because of the lack of sources of funding as it was not oft en prioriti zed by both government and other stakeholders (implementi ng partners) working in the fi eld of D/CRM. The fact that conti ngency planning relies on a comprehensive risk assessment which was not done unti l the aspect of hazard, risk, and vulnerability mapping was undertaken contributed to it not being prioriti zed. The methodology for conti ngency planning was not also standardized and so there was no agreement on the quality and standard for said conti ngency plans.
Early warning was menti oned as an area with gaps because of several inadequacies including lack of resources including essenti al equipment for forecasti ng disasters. Human resource gaps identi fi ed in preparedness include the lack of skilled personnel in adequate number to be able to undertake disaster and climate risk management preparedness in various public and private insti tuti ons.
54.5
43.5
32.5
21.5
10.5
0
Rat
e
Early warningsystem
Elements of Preparedness Capacity
Preparedness Capacity
Contingencyplanning
Awarenesscreation
Human resourcetraining
3 32.93.3
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 13
Acti on Points
Conti ngency Planning
• OPM and should harmonize a nati onal conti ngency plan and methodology for all D/CRM practi ti oners as the study shows that Conti ngency Planning is inadequate at 2.9;
• There is need to develop multi -hazard conti ngency plans (fl oods, drought, fi re, diseases, etc);• Government and development partners should develop and operati onalise business
conti nuity plans (BCP) to support and compliment the Conti ngency Plans.
Early Warning
Early warning is essenti al in terms of preparedness and miti gati on of disasters. To realizeeff ecti veness of Preparedness and miti gati on the following acti ons points are suggested:
• There is need for government and development partners to systemati ze early warning systems into their planning and programming acti viti es;
• Organize specialized trainings for D/CRM practi ti oners on early warning systems; Organize exchange learning visits to countries that have excelled in early warning systems such as Philippines, Malaysia and Hongkong;
• Government through Meteorology departments should set up weather stati ons and automati c network all over the country to facilitate early warning systems;
• OPM should coordinate early warning acti viti es;• There is need to undertake research, document and promote indigenous knowledge in early
preparedness and early response.
Human Resources
Human resources is criti cal for eff ecti ve D/CRM. The following are the acti on points to address the human resource gaps under Preparedness:
• There is need for specialized training in D/CRM (preparedness, miti gati on, response and rehabilitati on/recovery);
• There is need to provide specialized short courses including GIS, CCM/A, search and rescue, conti ngency planning, early warning system, HVCA for DC RM practi ti oners; There is need for strategic alliance/engagement with insti tuti ons of higher learning to coach and mentor D/CRM practi ti oners;
• Provide opportunity for D/CRM practi ti oner for exchange learning visits; and • Invite experts/guest speakers on D/CRM to share experiences.
Miti gati on capacity was considered to be highest for hazard, risk and vulnerability assessments and research and knowledge management. The study has, however, revealed that capacity is considered least for risk transfer transfer/microinsurance mechanisms rated 2.2, environmental resource management 2.6 and livelihood resilience rated and community based D/CRM rated 2.7, respecti vely.
The Office of the Prime Minister
14 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Figure 7: Miti gati on capacity
Strengths
Under miti gati on, capacity was reported to be high in the areas of Hazards and Vulnerability Assessments rated 2.9, and Research and knowledge management rated 2.8. The higher capacity in the domains of hazards and vulnerability assessment, as well as, research and knowledge transfers and disseminati on may be att ributed to their being considered important and organizati ons oft en strive to ensure they are carried out either using their own or hired specialists prior to mounti ng interventi ons. The fi ndings of assessments and research and knowledge management are criti cal in helping steer implementati on of the D/CRM acti viti es.
Inadequacies
Several areas of capacity inadequacies were identi fi ed including in the areas of risk transfer transfer/micro-insurance rated 2.2, environmental resource management rated 2.6; livelihood resilience rated 2.7 and community-based DRR rated 2.7, respecti vely. The low capacity for risk transfers and micro-insurance is att ributable to the lack of resources including fi nances and human resources to eff ect these interventi ons. Environmental resource management capacity may be lacking owing to the several investments required in the domain including fi nancial, material, human and equipment required for implementati on. Capacity for livelihood resilience may be low because of limited individual and community and organizati onal investments in various socio-economic and Agricultural undertakings. Finally, the low community based DRR capacity needs to be enhanced through a multi pronged support mechanism including community sensiti zati on and strengthening community leadership structures to eff ecti vely implement D/CRM.
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2.7
Rat
e
Communitybased DRM
Livelihoodsresilience
Environmentalresource
management
Risktransfer/Micro
insurance
Hazard, risks andvulnerabilityassessment
Research and knowledge
management
Elements of Mitigation Capacity
2.7 2.7
2.2
2.9 2.8
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 15
Acti on Points
Livelihoods and Risk Transfer Mechanisms
• Enhance food security measures by all stakeholders;• Climate change adaptati on and miti gati on measures (small scale irrigati on and water
harvesti ng schemes);• Diversifi cati on of livelihoods measures (including crop producti on, livestock, as well as trade);• Supporti ng community resilience including training. Constructi on of water resources that
are climate risk proof;• Multi -hazards Insurance policy to support (drought, fl oods, pests, and fi res) disasters; and• Revolving food stocking system.
Community-Based DRR
• Establish DRR functi onal structures – committ ees at community level;• Establish awareness creati on – community sensiti zati on on disaster and climate change risk
management (e.g. drama groups); and• Coordinati on of acti viti es by district DDMC and OPM.
Environmental Management
• Establish by-laws against environmental degradati on and bad practi ces such as charcoal, bush burning, etc.;
• Undertake aff orestati on to increase carbon capture and sequestrati on and help improve biodiversity;
• Enforcing policy on environmental protecti on e.g. tree planti ng, wetland management, polluti on, etc.;
• Establish by laws against environmental degradati on e.g. charcoal, bush burning, etc.; and• Support waste management (recycle, collecti on, etc.) to minimize drainage blockade leading
to fl ooding, etc.
The study has revealed that capacity for rapid assessment was rated 3.0, however capacity for emergency response was rated higher at 3.4. This suggests the need to further strengthen rapid assessment capacity as well as emergency response eff orts.
Strengths and Inadequacies
Under response, capacity was reported to be higher for emergency response rated 3.3 compared to rapid assessment rated 3.0. The plausible explanati on is that implementi ng partners may be investi ng more in emergency response – to save lives than in undertaking studies to provide evidence for response. Hence, rapid assessment is less prioriti zed as a vital acti vity for investment. Implementi ng partners oft en use the term ”quick and dirty” for rapid assessment which suggests that it is a crude exercise and not considered very important. Moreover, it may also require that implementi ng organizati on have to hire external consultants at a cost.
The Office of the Prime Minister
16 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Figure 8: Response capacity
Acti on Points
• Rapid assessment is a vital initi al step in emergency response and should be prioriti zed and undertaken systemati cally and with a clear methodology.
• Training courses in research methodology e.g. quanti tati ve and qualitati ve research techniques are recommended for in service personnel in various organizati ons.
• Acquisiti on of equipment for rescue and response acti viti es e.g. earth moving equipment, GPS, ambulance, helicopters, etc.;
• Stockpiling of supplies – food and non food items – drugs, vaccines, etc.; • Establishment of warehouses/stores in disaster prone areas;• Training in emergency response e.g. fi rst aids, search and rescue, etc.; and• Acti vati ng and operati onalising incident command centre at nati onal level e.g. NECOC.
Figure 9: Rehabilitati on/Recovery Capacity
Emergency Response
Elem
ents
of R
espo
nse
Cap
acity
3.4
3
0 1 2 3 4 5
Rapid assessment
Resettlement initiatives
Elem
ents
of R
ehab
ilita
tion
Needs assessment
2.7
Rates
3.3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 17
Characteristi cs Rati ngsHigh Overall
RateVery Low
Low Moderate High Very High
Human ResourcesPresence of qualifi ed staff for D/CRM
0.1 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.7 3.0
Capacity for D/CRM/specialised staff
0.1 0.3 0.9 1.2 0.7 3.2
Average 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.0 0.7 3.1Knowledge and SkillsStaff with knowledge & skills for preparedness
0.1 0.3 1.1 1.0 0.8 3.3
Staff with knowledge & skills for miti gati on 0.1
0.4 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 3.2
Staff with knowledge & skills for response 0.1
0.3 1.0 1.3 0.7 3.3
Staff with knowledge & skills for rehabilitati on
0.1 0.3 1.0 1.4 0.9 3.2
Average 0.1 0.3 1.2 1.2 0.8 3.3
The study has revealed that capacity for needs assessment is higher 3.3 compared to rehabilitati on initi ati ves rated 2.7 which may be att ributed to the costs associated with the later.
Strengths
During the recovery phase, the study has revealed that stakeholders have higher capacity for needs assessment rated 3.3 compared to capacity for resett lement initi ati ves. The reason for higher capacity for needs assessment may be att ributed to the fact that this requires signifi cantly less fi nancial, material and human resources.
Inadequacies
Capacity for rehabilitati on initi ati ves was reported by stakeholders as lower rated 2.7. The explanati on for this fi nding is that rehabilitati on initi ati ves require several inputs including planning for and signifi cant material requirement which the various implementi ng partners may not have.
Acti on Points
• Integrate durable soluti ons into planning and programming of recovery/rehabilitati on acti viti es such empowering communiti es to plan own foods under self-help initi ati ves;
• Allocati on of budget at nati onal and local levels for recovery and rehabilitati on;• Work with communiti es in designing and implementi ng recovery plans; and• Awareness creati on on DRR to miti gate impact of disaster.
4.4 Individual Level Capacity
Table 2: Individual level Capacity
The Office of the Prime Minister
18 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
The individual level capacity most highly rated were staff with knowledge and skills in response and preparedness rated at 3.3 and staff with knowledge and skills in miti gati on, and rehabilitati on rated 3.2, as well as, availability of specialised staff for D/CRM 3.2. Overall, human resource availability for D/CRM interventi ons was rated lower at 3.1 compared to staff knowledge and skills rated 3.3.
Strengths
The study has revealed that individual level capacity most highly rated, were; staff having knowledge and skills in response and preparedness rated 3.3 each, and staff having knowledge and skills in miti gati on, and rehabilitati on rated 3.2 as well as the availability of staff specialized in D/CRM rated 3.2, respecti vely. The availability of staff specialized in D/CRM was, however, more confi ned to organizati ons having expatriate staff but with rather few specialized nati onals and locally trained staff .
Inadequacies
Several areas of capacity gaps in D/CRM were identi fi ed including having few staff members qualifi ed in D/CRM rated 3.0. This suggests the need to have more staff in various organizati ons to be trained and qualifi ed to undertake specialised D/CRM interventi ons. In additi on, the study revealed lack of appropriate trainings for personnel to undertake D/CRM programme implementati on. Moreover it was menti oned that the training insti tuti ons in the country do not off er specialised training courses in disaster and climate change risk management. Another area of gap was the lack of availability of appropriate equipment e.g. weather forecasti ng equipment, and various health faciliti es lack diagnosti cs tools, these aff ect disaster and climate change risk interventi ons during various phases of disaster.
Acti on Points
• There is need for specialized professional courses on D/CRM (preparedness, miti gati on, response and rehabilitati on/recovery);
• There is need to provide specialized short courses including GIS, CCM/A, search and rescue, conti ngency planning, early warning system, HVCA for D/CRM practi ti oners; There is need for strategic alliance/engage with insti tuti ons of higher learning to coach and mentor D/CRM practi ti oners;
• Provide opportunity for D/CRM practi ti oner for exchange learning visits;• Provide opportuniti es for experts on D/CRM/Guest speakers to share experiences; Establish
curriculum for D/CRM from Primary to University level educati on/training; Provide career guidance to enti ce and encourage students to specialize in D/CRM; and Moti vate existi ng staff in D/CRM e.g. through provision of equipment, sponsorships, short courses, awards, and fi nancial awards.
4.5 Crosscutti ng Issues relati ng to D/CRM Capacity
Under crosscutti ng issues, coordinati on was rated highest 3.5, followed by resource mobilizati on rated 3.3 and informati on system management rated 3.3 respecti vely. However capacity was con-sidered low in the following areas - availability of equipments, engendering D/CRM, and sustaina-bility planning for D/CRM.
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 19
Figure 10: Cross Cutti ng Issues
Strengths
The study has shown that under cross cutti ng issues, stakeholders have reported having capacity for Coordinati on rated 3.5, Resource mobilizati on rated 3.3, and Informati on system management rated 3.3. Availability of capacity for coordinati on within various organizati ons is expected since in the fi eld of D/CRM, coordinati on of acti viti es is a criti cal acti vity and all stakeholders parti cipate in various coordinati on meeti ngs. It also enhances achievement of the goals of D/CRM. Similarly, all stakeholders have to look for resources (fi nancial) hence resource mobilizati on is a vital skill that staff in organizati ons must have in order to enable their organizati ons implement acti viti es in the fi eld.
Inadequacies
At the organizati onal level, inadequacies were reported in the areas of establishment of sustainability plan for D/CRM rated 2.4, availability of D/CRM equipment rated 2.5 and mainstreaming of Gender into D/CRM rated 2.9, respecti vely. The lack of sustainability plans for D/CRM within stakeholder organizati ons refl ects the fact that most of the organizati ons are working in emergencies and lack sustainability and long term exit plans. It is vital that organizati ons draw plans for sustaining the interventi ons/acti viti es that they are undertaking in the various setti ngs for the good of the communiti es they serve. The lack of mainstreaming gender into disaster and climate risk management is a gap that was menti oned by several stakeholders. This is due to several factors including availability of policy and personnel within various organizati ons. Finally as discussed earlier, the lack of equipment for D/CRM acti viti es hampers eff ecti ve response. There is need to plan for and secure appropriate equipment in the fi eld.
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
3.5
2.4
Rate
Coordi
natio
n Cap
acity
IMS an
d diss
emina
tion c
apac
ity
Timely
DRM ac
tivity
imple
mentat
ionEqu
ipmen
t for D
RM
Gende
r and
DRM be
ing im
plemen
ted
Resou
rce m
obilis
ation
for D
RMCap
acity
to de
al with
CCA
Sustai
nabil
ity pl
an
Cross Cutting Issues
3.33
2.62.9 3 3.1
The Office of the Prime Minister
20 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Acti on Points
Equipment
• Needs for government and stakeholders to invest in equipment for preparedness and response – Earth moving, GIS and Ambulance services for emergency health services delivery; and
• Allocate budget at nati onal and district levels to acquire appropriate equipment periodically (at district level through the district development plan).
Gender• Mainstream gender in D/CRM planning, implementati on and monitoring across all levels and
by all stakeholders;• Ensure there is a gender focal person at nati onal, and community level to specifi cally deal
with gender related issues;• Allocate budget for gender – government and development partners; Train D/CRM
practi ti oners in gender mainstreaming; and• Research on gender and disaster and climate risk management.
Sustainability
• Government and development partners should ensure availability of sustainability plans in any D/CRM project or programme;
• Work with local government in implementi ng and monitoring projects/programmes to ensure sustainability;
• Work with communiti es in implementi ng and monitoring projects/programmes to ensure sustainability; and
• Ensure/design exit strategy in any D/CRM projects and programmes.
Climate change adaptati on
• Training in CCA/M;• Budget for CCA/M;• Operati onalise and popularize CCA Policy at all levels- nati onal, district and community level;• Improve coordinati on of CCA acti viti es;• Strengthen community structures for CCA to build community resilience; and• Support research in CCA/M.
Resource mobilizati on and ti mely implementati on
• Early preparedness in terms of - human resource fi nance and equipment;• Budget allocati on for early preparedness and early response;;• Need for emergency funds, readily available without any red tapes – bureaucracy; Specialized
staff on standby for emergency response 24/7; and• Moti vati on for staff working in emergencies.
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 21
5.0 Lessons LearnedSeveral issues were menti oned as criti cal for eff ecti ve D/CRM by the various stakeholders.
5.1: Preparedness is key to disaster and climate risk management:
Early preparedness and early response save lives and money as well. It is more costly to respond to disasters than to prepare.
5.2 Empowering local governments:
Disasters are local. Hence response if well conducted by local people/communiti es is quicker, rather than waiti ng for central government response which may take ti me. It is therefore prudent to empower the local communiti es in disaster prone areas, and ensure they are equipped to handle emergencies in their own setti ngs.Therefore, community-based capacity building is essenti al and should be embarked upon.
5.3 Coordinati on is essenti al to D/CRM:
Coordinati on is criti cal in D/CRM interventi ons as it contributes towards cost reducti on and minimising duplicati on of services .
5.4 Partnership is important in D/CRM:
It was also emphasized during the stakeholder meeti ngs that partnership is criti cal in D/CRM to generate synergies and strengths from other organizati ons. For example, those weak in preparedness may be strong in response, or in rehabilitati on/recovery and vice-versa.
5.5 Standardizati on of D/CRM tools:
It was learned during the capacity assessment that working with standardized tools brings about harmonized results. Diff erent tools may be confusing and create challenges in the interpretati on of fi ndings.
5.6 Mainstreaming D/CRM:
Mainstreaming D/CRM in all government Ministries,Departments and Agencies will help a great deal in miti gati ng disasters in the country as many stakeholders plan for and contribute towards D/CRM. Gender issues should be clearly identi fi ed in all D/CRM acti viti es and adaptati on opti ons.
5.7 Research and informati on sharing:
Conducti ng regular researches brings in new knowledge and informati on towards more eff ecti ve D/CRM interventi ons. It was noted that several organizati ons have done good research work, however, they have neither disseminated widely nor published their fi ndings.
The Office of the Prime Minister
22 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
6.0 Challenges
6.1 Human resources
There are several challenges with human resources for D/CRM. These include:• Inadequate number of skilled human resources required for D/CRM programme implementati on
at various government (central and local) levels and within various implementi ng insti tuti ons;• Inadequate specialized human resources for D/CRM in the areas e.g. climate change adaptati on
(CCA); and• High staff turnover for those working in the area of D/CRM at ministry level.
6.2 Funding
Funding present signifi cant challenges to D/CRM implementati on due to:• Insuffi cient resource allocati on for D/CRM as well as low resource mobilizati on mechanisms at
various ministry and local (district) government levels;• Politi cal will should be made practi cal by parliament and Ministry of Finance through allocati on
of funds for D/CRM; and• Lack of emergency funds which is frustrati ng the Department of Disaster Preparedness and
Management to respond and coordinate emergencies in the country.
6.3 Equipment
Disaster and climate risk management is aff ected by limited availability of equipment and infrastructure (weather stati ons) for disaster preparedness, miti gati on and response interventi ons.
6.4 Early warning and response
The main challenges include:• Low capacity of early warning systems thus leading to slow response; and• Being reacti onary than proacti ve in disaster risk management.
6.5 Cross-cutti ng challenges
• Lack of D/CRM law to operati onalize the existi ng D/CRM policy in Uganda;• Inadequate knowledge of damage and loss analysis. For example, there has been no esti mate of
economic loss of Bududa landslides and Kasese fl oods disasters; and• Low capacity to operati onalize the full cyclic D/CRM interventi ons.
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 23
7.0 Overall Recommendations7.1 Enabling Environment Capacity
These fi ndings suggest the need for strengthening eff orts towards enhancing disaster and climate risk management by the various stakeholders/organizati ons:• Integrate disaster and climate risk management in all social, economic and environmental
policies and development agenda;• Develop and ensure SOPs are used to guide acti ons/interventi ons in D/CRM;• Strengthen appropriate and ti mely risk communicati on at nati onal and local levels to allow
eff ecti ve adaptati on and disaster and climate risk management;• Increase mobilizati on eff orts for funds towards D/CRM. Lobby for budgetary allocati on within
organizati ons for D/CRM interventi ons. Lobby donors and partners to raise funds and resources towards disaster and climate risks management;
• Strengthen mechanisms for monitoring and evaluati on of D/CRM interventi ons; and• Train more personnel to specialize in the fi eld of D/CRM.
7.2 Organizati on Capacity
These fi ndings suggest the need for strengthening organizati on capacity in various areas:
Human resources capacity
• Provide graduate and post-graduate specialized training programmes within Universiti es to improve D/CRM interventi ons.
Equipment and Infrastructure
Ensure availability of appropriate equipment forpersonnel e.g. for CCA/M, response etc to improve D/CRM;
• Provide specialized IT equipment at various levels including nati onal, districts and to organizati ons involved in D/CRM;
• Revamp/rehabilitate existi ng weather stati ons and build new ones in districts/regions without nearer stati ons and
• Emphasis be put on building climate risk proof houses/infrastructures.
Stakeholders
Strengthen partnerships to enhance learning in various D/CRM domains and practi ces.
Research• Support research eff orts in various relevant and topical areas that infl uence evidence base
practi ce and policy development in D/CRM; and• Establish agenda and research desk within organizati ons including ministries, districts, UN
agencies and NGOs.
The Office of the Prime Minister
24 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Conti ngency planning
• Develop conti ngency plans at nati onal and district levels.
7.3 Individual Level Capacity
The fi ndings suggest the need to strengthen individual capacity through provision of;
• Specialised graduate training for D/CRM. These courses should be provided in reputable insti tuti ons of learningand must be accredited.
• Short training courses in D/CRM. These certi fi cate courses should address areas of gaps including e.g. conti ngency planning, early warning, and basic introducti on to D/CRM, Hazards and Vulnerability Assessments etc.
• Capacity building in disaster and climate change risk management and empowerment should be tailored/targeted at grassroots level for community extension workers and other services providers.
7.4 Cross-cutti ng issues
• D/CRM law: There is need for the Government of Uganda to expedite the process of enacti ng the D/CRM law in order to operati onalize the existi ng D/CRM policy.
• Damage and Loss Analysis (DALA): There is need for government and development partners to begin calculati ng the economic loss emanati ng from disasters in Uganda.
• Disaster Risk Reducti on Parliamentary Forum should always be engaged with the Nati onal DRR Platf orm meeti ngs and be given the advocacy agenda to help them lobby in Parliament, most especially on budget allocati on, emergency funding and laws related to disasters.
• There is need for research on Gender and Disaster Risk Management in Uganda to understand the gender perspecti ves relati ng to disasters.
• The Disaster Risk Management Capacity Assessment (D/CRMCA) should be extended in the near future to cover the sub nati onal level stakeholders including the 112 districts in Uganda.
• The D/CRMCA fi nal report should be launched and disseminated widely to stakeholders in Uganda as well as the D/CRM nati onal policy.
• The D/CRMCA and capacity development plan should be used by government and development partners as a working paper for the next fi ve (5) years (2014-2017).
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 25
8.0 ConclusionsThe study has revealed several gaps and challenges in D/CRM in the country. Under the enabling environment, the domains with the most inadequacies included funding/budgetary allocati on, lack of SOP and inadequate monitoring and evaluati on of D/CRM interventi ons.
At the organizati onal level, under preparedness, inadequacies exits in several areas and mainly in the domain of conti ngency planning, early warning and human resources skilled in D/CRM; under miti gati on inadequacies exist in the areas of risk transfer mechanisms, microfi nance, inadequate equipment, livelihoods resilience; and under response, there is need to strengthen emergency response eff orts and fi nally under rehabilitati on there are gaps in establishing rehabilitati on initi ati ves.
At the individual level, inadequacies exist in having qualifi ed staff in D/CRM.
The main challenges identi fi ed in D/CRM interventi ons were in the areas of limited resource allocati on/funding, limited equipment for D/CRM for specialised response capaciti es; low capacity for early warning; inadequate human resource capaciti es/coupled with staff turnover in insti tuti ons hence there is need to conti nuous training/capacity building.
Therefore the multi plicity of inadequacies in capaciti es suggest the need for the government (at nati onal and local levels) and stakeholder to invest in strengthening capaciti es in the various domains of D/CRM spanning the enabling environment, organizati onal and individual levels for eff ecti ve disaster and climate risk management interventi ons in the country.
The Office of the Prime Minister
26 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
S/O Name of the Organizati on/individuals
Government Agencies
1 The Offi ce of the Prime Minister, Disaster Dept
2 Ministry of Health
3 Meteorology
4 Ministry of Water and Environment
5 Ministry of Agricultureulture, AnimalsÊ Industry and Fisheries
6 Ministry of Local government
7 Uganda Red Cross Society
8 Ministry of Educati on
9 Ministry of Works and Transport
10 NARO
11 NEMA
12 Uganda Police
13 Kampala City Council Authority
14 NECOC
15 Uganda Local Government Associati on (ULGA)
16 Parliamentary Forum on DRR
17 Parliamentary Forum on Climate Change
18 Nati onal Planning Authority
19 Ministry of Finance
Academic Insti tuti ons1 Makerere University
2 Uganda Christi an University - Mukono
3 Kampala Internati onal University
4 Uganda Martyrs University
UN Agencies1 WHO
Key organizati ons/informants for Capacity Building Assessment on Disaster/Climate Risk Management in Uganda
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 27
2 UNICEF
3 WFP
4 UNDP
5 FAO
6 IOM
7 UNISDR
8 UNFPA
Internati onal NGOs1 Oxfam
2 Plan Internati onal
3 IIRR
4 Save the Children Internati onal
5 CARE internati onal
6 World Vision Internati onal
7 IUCN
8 Goal
9 Concern
10 Danchurch Aid
11 CRS
12 ACTED
13 ACCRA
14 ADRA
15 Acti on Aid
16 WWF
Local NGOs1 CANU-NET C/O Oxfam
2 CARITAS
3 UJCC
4 DENIVA
5 Ecological Christi an Organizati on
The Office of the Prime Minister
28 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
28 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
Part
2:
Cap
acit
y D
evel
opm
ent
Plan
for
Dis
aste
r Ri
sk M
anag
emen
t, U
gand
a 20
15-2
020
Prea
mbl
e
The
Disa
ster
/Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity D
evel
opm
ent p
lan
was
gene
rate
d fr
om th
e fi n
ding
s of t
he D
/CRM
Cap
acity
Ass
essm
ent.
The
capa
city
de
velo
pmen
t pla
n fo
cuse
s on
the
existi
ng
gaps
with
in th
e D/
CRM
in th
e co
untr
y. T
he p
lan
is m
ulti -
sect
oral
and
cov
ers t
he p
erio
d, 2
015
- 202
0.
The
capa
city
dev
elop
men
t has
bee
n fo
rmul
ated
bas
ed o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
assu
mpti
ons
; tha
t fun
ds w
ill b
e av
aila
ble,
that
ther
e w
ill p
oliti
cal w
ill, a
vaila
ble
moti
vat
ed te
chni
cal s
taff
and
robu
st c
oord
inati
on
by O
PM to
ena
ble
the
impl
emen
tati o
n of
D/C
RM c
apac
ity d
evel
opm
ent p
lan.
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 29
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 2
9
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Disa
ster
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Cap
acity
Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n, U
gand
a, 2
015-
2020
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
Enab
ling
Envi
ronm
ent
1. St
anda
rd
Ope
rati n
g Pr
oced
ures
(SO
P)
Obj
ecti v
e:
Stan
dard
O
pera
ti ng
Proc
edur
es
deve
lope
d an
d pr
ovid
ed fo
r the
im
plem
enta
ti on
of D
/CRM
Revi
ew/d
evel
op
and
adap
t SO
P
Revi
ew/d
raft
SOP
SOP
in D
/CRM
Evid
ence
of S
OP
for D
/CRM
O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
1 ye
ar50
m/=
Diss
emin
ate
and
enfo
rce
use
of S
tand
ard
Ope
rati n
g Pr
oced
ure
(SO
P)
Dist
ribut
e an
d se
nsiti
ze o
n us
e of
SO
P in
D/C
RM
SOP
Guid
elin
e fo
r D/
CRM
in p
lace
Exist
ence
of
SOP
for D
/CRM
at
nati
ona
l and
su
bnati
ona
l lev
els
and
priv
ate
sect
or
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
1 ye
ar50
m/=
2.
Fina
nces
for D
/CR
M
Obj
ecti v
e:
Gen
erat
e Fi
nanc
es
for i
mpr
oved
im
plem
enta
ti on
of D
/CRM
Lobb
ying
/pla
n-ni
ng/fi
nan
cing
of
D/CR
M
Revi
ew/d
raft
gove
rnm
ent
budg
et fo
r fun
ds
for D
/CRM
Fina
nces
for D
/CR
MEv
iden
ce o
f Fu
nds f
or D
/CRM
O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
500m
/=
Mob
iliza
ti on
of
fi nan
ces f
or D
/CR
M
Stra
tegy
for
Fund
raisi
ng fo
r D/
CRM
Fund
s rai
sed
for
D/CR
MEx
isten
ce o
f fu
nds f
or D
/CRM
at
nati
ona
l and
su
bnati
ona
l lev
els
and
priv
ate
sect
ors
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
500m
/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
30 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
30 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
3.
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
ti on
of D
/CRM
In
terv
enti o
ns
Obj
ecti v
e:
Und
erta
ke M
&E
of a
ll D/
CRM
Pr
ojec
ts a
nd
Prog
ram
mes
Inte
grat
e M
&E
plan
s in
D/CR
M
proj
ects
and
pr
ogra
mm
e
M&
E pl
an in
pl
ace
M&
E pl
an fo
r D/
CRM
Evid
ence
of M
&E
for D
/CRM
O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
1 ye
ar10
0m/=
Carr
y ou
t M&
E in
D/C
RM
proj
ects
and
pr
ogra
mm
es
Fund
s and
Pe
rson
nel t
o un
dert
ake
M&
E fo
r D/
CRM
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
ti on
cond
ucte
d to
im
prov
e D
/CRM
Exist
ence
of M
&E
repo
rt fo
r D/
CRM
pro
ject
s &
prog
ram
mes
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Keys
: D/C
RM=D
isast
er R
isk M
anag
emen
t; SO
P=St
anda
rd O
pera
ti ng
Proc
edur
es; M
&E=
Mon
itorin
g an
d Ev
alua
ti on;
UN
Uni
ted
Nati
ons
; OPM
=Offi
ce o
f the
Prim
e M
inist
er
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 31
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
STO
rgan
izati o
nal L
evel
4.
Prep
ared
ness
fo
r D/C
RM
Obj
ecti v
e 1:
St
reng
then
Ea
rly W
arni
ng
Syst
ems f
or D
/CR
M
Syst
emati
ze/
Ea
rly W
arni
ngIn
tegr
ate
EWS
at a
ll le
vels
–na
ti ona
l to
loca
l
EWS
at a
ll le
vels
Evid
ence
of
EWS
for D
/CRM
av
aila
bilit
y
Met
eoro
logy
/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
1 ye
ar10
0m/=
Org
anize
sp
ecia
lized
tr
aini
ngs o
n EW
S
Fund
s for
EW
S pe
rson
nel
Trai
ned
pers
onne
l in
EW
SEx
isten
ce o
f tra
ined
im
plem
enti n
g EW
S M
eteo
rolo
gy/
OPM
De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
2-5
year
s50
0m/=
Exch
ange
le
arni
ngFu
nds a
nd
pers
onne
lPe
rson
nel i
n ex
chan
ge le
arni
ng
visit
s to
impr
ove
EWS
Num
ber o
f ex
chan
ge v
isits
co
nduc
ted
Met
eoro
logy
/O
PM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
250m
/=
Set u
p w
eath
er
stati
ons
acr
oss
the
Coun
try
Fund
s and
Eq
uipm
ent
Dist
ricts
with
w
eath
er st
ati o
nsN
umbe
r of w
eath
er
stati
ons
est
ablis
hed
Met
eoro
logy
/O
PM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
OPM
/M
eteo
rolo
gy
coor
dina
te E
WS
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Coor
dina
ti on
impr
oved
to
stre
ngth
en E
arly
w
arni
ng sy
stem
Coor
dina
ti on
mee
ti ngs
bei
ng
cond
ucte
d an
d Re
port
s
OPM
/ M
eteo
rolo
gy
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 3
1
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
The Office of the Prime Minister
32 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Prom
ote
indi
geno
us
know
ledg
e
Fund
s and
re
sear
cher
sRe
sear
ch re
port
sCo
mm
uniti
es
prac
ti cin
g IK
OPM
/ M
eteo
rolo
gyDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
500m
/=
5.
Prep
ared
ness
fo
r D/C
RM
Obj
ecti v
e 2:
Est
ablis
h Co
nti n
genc
y Pl
ans f
or D
/CRM
Harm
onise
co
nti n
genc
y pl
ans f
or D
/CRM
am
ongs
t st
akeh
olde
rs in
th
e co
untr
y
Stak
ehol
der
parti
cipa
ti on
Nati
ona
l co
nti n
genc
y pl
an
Evid
ence
of
Nati
ona
l co
nti n
genc
y pl
an fo
r D/C
RM
avai
labl
e
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
1 y
ear
800m
/=
Deve
lop
mul
ti -ha
zard
s co
nti n
genc
y pl
an
Fund
s and
st
akeh
olde
rs
Mul
ti -ha
zard
s co
nti n
genc
y pl
anEx
isten
ce o
f mul
ti -ha
zard
s pla
n O
PM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
1 ye
ar50
0m/=
Deve
lop
and
oper
ati o
nalis
e Bu
sines
s Co
nti n
uity
Pla
n
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Busin
ess
conti
nui
ty p
lan
esta
blish
ed
BCP
in p
lace
do
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Keys
: BCP
=Bus
ines
s Con
ti nui
ty P
lan;
NGO
=Non
gov
ernm
enta
l org
aniza
ti ons
; EW
S=Ea
rly W
arni
ng S
yste
ms;
CCA
/M=c
limat
e ch
ange
miti
gati o
n an
d ad
apta
ti on;
M
WE=
Min
istry
of W
orks
and
Env
ironm
ent
32 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 33
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 3
3
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
6.
Prep
ared
ness
fo
r D/C
RM
Obj
ecti v
e 3:
To
stre
ngth
en
Hum
an R
esou
rces
Ca
paci
ty f
or D
/CR
M
Spec
ializ
ed
trai
ning
in D
/CR
M
Cour
ses
Fund
ing/
Spon
sors
hips
Spec
ializ
ed
pers
onne
l in
D/CR
M
Num
ber o
f Sp
ecia
lized
gr
adua
tes i
n D/
CRM
trai
ned
Mak
erer
e U
nive
rsity
OPM
/De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Spec
ializ
ed S
hort
co
urse
s in
D/CR
M
Cour
ses/
Fund
s fo
r spo
nsor
ship
s
Trai
ned
pers
onne
l in
spec
ializ
ed
shor
t cou
rses
Num
ber t
rain
ed
in S
peci
alize
d D/
CRM
shor
t co
urse
s
Uni
vers
ity/
OPM
De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Part
ners
hips
w
ith U
nive
rsiti
es
for c
ouch
ing/
men
tors
hips
/Fi
eld
wor
k
Fund
s/pe
rson
nel/
men
tors
/Fie
ld
sites
MoU
es
tabl
ished
Num
ber o
f m
ente
es/
stud
ents
pla
ced
at si
tes/
couc
hed
Uni
vers
ity/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
1 ye
ar10
0m
Exch
ange
le
arni
ngFu
nds a
nd
pers
onne
lPe
rson
nel i
n ex
chan
ge
Num
ber o
f visi
tsO
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
500m
/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
34 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
34 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Expe
rts a
nd
gues
t spe
aker
s in
D/C
RM/
CCM
/A
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Repo
rts
Num
bers
of
Talk
s/co
nfer
ence
sO
PM/
Met
eoro
logy
De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOS
and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
500m
/=
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
7.
Miti
gati o
n fo
r D/
CRM
Obj
ecti v
e 1:
To
stre
ngth
en
Live
lihoo
ds
resi
lienc
e
Enha
nce
food
secu
rity
mea
sure
s
Fund
ing/
trai
ning
/eq
uipm
ent/
st
orag
e
Food
secu
rity
for v
ulne
rabl
e co
mm
uniti
es
Num
ber o
f co
urse
s/St
orag
e/
Equi
pmen
t
Min
istry
of
Agric
ultu
re/O
PM
OPM
/De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
1 ye
ar40
0m/=
Clim
ate
Chan
ge
Adap
tati o
n an
d M
iti ga
ti on
mea
sure
s
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Mai
nstr
eam
ing
Clim
ate
chan
ge
Adap
tati o
n an
d m
iti ga
ti on
to im
prov
e liv
elih
oods
re
silie
nce
Clim
ate
chan
ge
adap
tati o
n an
d m
iti ga
ti on
acti v
iti es
re
port
ed a
nd
reco
rded
MW
E/O
PM
Line
Min
istrie
s,
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ar4b
n/=
Wor
k w
ith
Com
mun
ity
Dive
rsifi
cati o
n of
Li
velih
oods
Fund
s/pe
rson
nel
Crop
s/an
imal
va
riety
in
crea
sed
Varie
ty o
f cro
ps/
anim
als/
busin
ess
intr
oduc
ed
Agric
ultu
re/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
4 ye
ars
5bn/
=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 35
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 3
5
Trai
ning
on
Com
mun
ity
Resil
ienc
e
Fund
s/ p
erso
nnel
Trai
ned
Com
mun
ity/
Pers
onne
l
Num
ber o
f tr
aini
ngs/
pers
ons
trai
ned
Agric
ultu
re/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ars
2 bn
/=
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
8.
Miti
gati o
n fo
r D/
CRM
Obj
ecti v
e 2:
To e
nhan
ce
Risk
Tra
nsfe
r m
echa
nism
s/
Mic
ro-s
avin
gs
Esta
blish
m
ulti -
haza
rds
insu
ranc
e po
licy/
sche
mes
Fund
ing/
st
akeh
olde
r pa
rti ci
pati o
n
Mul
ti -ha
zard
s in
sura
nce
polic
y
intr
oduc
ed
Evid
ence
of p
olic
y av
aila
bilit
yO
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ar2b
n/=
Revo
lvin
g Fo
od
Stoc
king
Sys
tem
Fund
s/Co
mm
unity
co
ntrib
uti o
n
Food
stoc
ks
avai
labi
lity
Evid
ence
of F
ood
stoc
ks
Agric
ultu
re/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ar1
bn/=
9.
Miti
gati o
n
Obj
ecti v
e 3.
To S
tren
gthe
n Co
mm
unity
DRR
Esta
blish
DRR
fu
ncti o
nal
stru
ctur
es –
co
mm
itt ee
s at
com
mun
ity le
vel
Fund
s/Pe
rson
nel
Stru
ctur
es
esta
blish
ed
and
reac
ti vat
ed
Evid
ence
of
Stru
ctur
e pr
esen
ce
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ars
500m
/=
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 3
5
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
The Office of the Prime Minister
36 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
36 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Esta
blish
aw
aren
ess
crea
ti on
(e.g
. dr
ama
grou
ps)
Fund
s/Pe
rson
nel
Awar
enes
s cr
eati o
n ac
ti viti
es
Leve
l of
awar
enes
s im
prov
ed b
y th
e co
mm
uniti
es
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
1 ye
ar30
0m/=
Coor
dina
ti on
of
acti
viti
es b
y di
stric
t DDM
C
Fund
s/Pe
rson
nel
Coor
dina
ti on
mee
ti ngs
N
umbe
r of
coor
dina
ti on
mee
ti ngs
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
400m
/=
Esta
blish
by-
law
s ag
ains
t en
viro
nmen
tal
degr
adati
on
bad
prac
ti ces
e.g
. ch
arco
al, b
ush
burn
ing
etc
Dist
rict
Auth
oriti
es/
Fund
s for
m
onito
ring
By-la
ws p
asse
d by
loca
l di
stric
ts
Num
ber o
f by
-law
s pas
sed
and
exec
uted
/ im
plem
ente
d
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ars
350m
/=
Miti
gati o
n
Obj
ecti v
e 4.
To st
reng
then
N
atur
al R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent
Enfo
rcin
g po
licy
on N
RMFu
nds/
Pers
onne
l N
RM p
olic
y m
eeti n
gsN
RM p
olic
y be
ing
enfo
rced
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
1 ye
ar30
0m/=
Pass
by-
law
s ag
ains
t en
viro
nmen
tal
degr
adati
on
Fund
s/Pe
rson
nel
Coun
cil
mee
ti ngs
on
by la
ws
Pass
ed b
y-la
ws
and
bein
g en
forc
ed
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ar20
0m/=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 37
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 3
7
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Supp
ort w
aste
m
anag
emen
t Fu
nds/
Pers
onne
lW
aste
m
anag
emen
t ac
ti viti
es b
eing
im
plem
ente
d
Impr
oved
en
viro
nmen
t M
WE/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
1 ye
ar40
0m/=
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
10. R
espo
nse
Obj
ecti v
e 1:
To S
tren
gthe
n em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
in
Uga
nda
Acqu
isiti o
n of
equ
ipm
ent
for r
escu
e an
d re
spon
se
acti v
iti es
e.g
. ea
rth
mov
ing
equi
pmen
t, GP
S,
ambu
lanc
e,
helic
opte
rs e
tc
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Resp
onse
ac
ti viti
es b
eing
fa
cilit
ated
by
acq
uire
d eq
uipm
ent
Pres
ence
of
new
ly b
ough
t eq
uipm
ent
OPM
and
M
inist
ry o
f W
orks
and
tr
ansp
ort
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ars
5bn/
=
Stoc
kpili
ng o
f su
pplie
s – fo
od
and
non
food
ite
ms –
dru
gs,
vacc
ines
, etc
.
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Stoc
k pi
les o
f fo
od a
nd n
on-
food
item
s po
siti o
ned
in a
ll di
sast
er p
rone
di
stric
ts
Avai
labi
lity
and
reco
rds o
f st
ockp
iles i
n al
l di
sast
er p
rone
di
stric
ts
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
pr
ivat
e se
ctor
2 ye
ars
6bn/
=
The Office of the Prime Minister
38 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
38 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Esta
blish
men
t of
war
ehou
ses/
stor
es in
disa
ster
pr
one
area
s
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
War
ehou
ses/
st
ores
re
acti v
ated
and
es
tabl
ished
.
Func
ti ona
l w
areh
ouse
s pr
esen
t in
disa
ster
pr
one
dist
ricts
.
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
9bn/
-
Trai
ning
in
emer
genc
y re
spon
se e
.g. fi
rst
aids
, sea
rch
and
resc
ue e
tc
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Trai
ning
ac
ti viti
es
orga
nize
d to
be
rolle
d ou
t to
dist
ricts
Trai
ned
pers
onne
l in
em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
4bn/
-
Acti v
ati n
g an
d op
erati
ona
lizati
on
inci
dent
co
mm
and
cent
er
at n
ati o
nal l
evel
e.
g. N
ECO
C
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Esta
blish
ing
inci
dent
co
mm
and
cent
re a
nd
NEC
OC
Func
ti ona
l in
cide
nt
com
man
d ce
ntre
at
OPM
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
1 ye
ar3b
n/=
Keys
; NEC
OC=
Nati
ona
l Em
erge
ncy
Coor
dina
ti ng
Cent
re;
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 39
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 3
9
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
11. R
ehab
ilita
ti on
/Rec
over
y D/
CRM
Obj
ecti v
e 1:
To
stre
ngth
en
Rese
tt le
men
t In
iti ati
ves
Inte
grat
e du
rabl
e so
luti o
ns in
to
plan
ning
and
pr
ogra
mm
ing
of
reco
very
/reh
ab
acti v
iti es
such
em
pow
erin
g co
mm
uniti
es to
pl
ant t
heir
ow
n fo
ods u
nder
self
help
initi
ati v
es
Fund
s,
coor
dina
ti on
and
pers
onne
l
Dura
ble
plan
s in
tegr
ated
into
pr
ogra
mm
ing
at n
ati o
nal a
nd
loca
l lev
el
Help
initi
ati v
es
reco
rded
and
re
port
ed.
Com
mun
iti es
are
ab
le a
nd re
silie
nt
to su
rviv
e on
thei
r ow
n.
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
5 bn
/=
Allo
cati o
n of
bud
get a
t na
ti ona
l and
lo
cal l
evel
s for
re
cove
ry a
nd
reha
bilit
ati o
n
Fund
sBu
dget
al
loca
ti on
impl
emen
ted
at n
ati o
nal a
nd
loca
l lev
el
Budg
et a
lloca
ti on
impl
emen
ted
at
nati o
nal a
nd lo
cal
leve
l.
Min
istry
of
Fina
nce
and
Econ
omic
pl
anni
ng a
nd
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
1 ye
ar6b
n/=
Wor
k w
ith
com
mun
iti es
in
desig
ning
and
im
plem
enti n
g re
cove
ry p
lans
Awar
enes
s cr
eati o
n on
DR
R to
miti
gate
im
pact
of
disa
ster
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Reco
very
pla
ns
desig
ned
and
impl
emen
ted
at a
ll di
sast
er
pron
e di
stric
ts
Awar
enes
s cr
eati o
n im
prov
ed a
nd
popu
lati o
n at
-ris
k re
spon
ds
acco
rdin
gly
A nu
mbe
r of
reco
very
pla
ns
bein
g de
signe
d an
d im
plem
ente
d by
com
mun
iti es
.
Awar
enes
s ac
ti viti
es re
cord
ed
and
leve
l of
awar
enes
s im
prov
ed.
OPM
an
d Li
ne
min
istrie
s
OPM
an
d lin
e m
inist
ries,
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
3 ye
ars
1 ye
ar
2bn/
=
1 bn
/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
40 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
40 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
12 In
divi
dual
Lev
el
Obj
ecti v
e 1:
To im
prov
e hu
man
reso
urce
s av
aila
bilit
y
Esta
blish
cu
rric
ulum
for
D/CR
M fr
om
Prim
ary
to
Uni
vers
ity le
vel.
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
D/CR
M b
eing
ta
ught
from
pr
imar
y to
un
iver
siti e
s us
ing
deve
lope
d cu
rric
ulum
Existi
ng
D/CR
M c
urric
ulum
fr
om P
rimar
y to
U
nive
rsiti
es.
Min
istry
of
Educ
ati o
n an
d O
PM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
2bn/
=
Care
er g
uida
nce
to e
nti c
e an
d en
cour
aged
st
uden
ts to
sp
ecia
lized
in D
/CR
M
Fund
s and
Pe
rson
nel
Maj
ority
are
en
rolle
d to
st
udy
D/CR
M
from
prim
ary
to u
nive
rsity
le
vel t
o in
crea
se
hum
an re
sour
ce
Reco
rds a
nd
repo
rts o
n en
rollm
ent o
f st
uden
ts fo
r D/
CRM
in U
gand
a
Min
istry
of
Educ
ati o
n an
d O
PM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
2bn
/=
Moti
vat
e ex
isti n
g st
aff i
n D/
CRM
; sp
onso
rshi
p,
shor
t cou
rses
, aw
ards
, fi n
ance
s
Fund
sIn
crea
se a
ble
and
moti
vat
ed
staff
in
D/CR
M
D/CR
M w
ork
bein
g do
ne in
ro
bust
man
ner b
y m
oti v
ated
staff
Incr
ease
d nu
mbe
r of
moti
vat
ed
staff
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
3bn/
=
Obj
ecti v
e 2:
To im
prov
e Kn
owle
dge
and
Skill
s
Spec
ializ
ed
trai
ning
in
D/C
RM
(pre
pare
dnes
s,
miti
gati o
n,
resp
onse
and
re
habi
litati
on/
reco
very
)
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Impr
oved
sp
ecia
lized
skill
s in
kno
wle
dge
in
D/CR
M
Num
ber o
f st
aff t
rain
ed in
sp
ecia
lized
D/
CRM
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 41
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 4
1
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Spec
ializ
ed
shor
t cou
rses
in
clud
ing
GIS,
CC
M/A
, sea
rch
and
resc
ue,
conti
nge
ncy
plan
ning
, ear
ly
war
ning
syst
em,
HVCA
for D
/CRM
pr
acti ti
one
rs
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Impr
oved
skill
s an
d kn
owle
dge
in D
/CRM
th
roug
h sh
ort
cour
ses
Num
ber o
f tr
aine
d st
aff i
n sh
ort c
ours
es in
D/
CRM
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
800m
/=
Stra
tegi
c al
lianc
e/en
gage
with
in
sti tu
ti ons
of
high
er le
arni
ng
to c
oach
and
m
ento
r D/C
RM
prac
ti ti o
ners
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Insti
tuti o
ns o
f hi
gher
lear
ning
en
gage
d fo
r co
achi
ng in
D/
CRM
Num
ber o
f in
sti tu
ti ons
en
gage
d an
d a
num
ber o
f sta
ff co
ache
d in
D/
CRM
.
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
1 bn
/=
Prov
ision
of
oppo
rtun
ity
for D
/CRM
pr
acti ti
one
rs
for e
xcha
nge
lear
ning
visi
ts
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Exch
ange
le
arni
ng v
isits
co
nduc
ted
and
skill
s and
kn
owle
dge
impr
oved
Num
ber o
f le
arni
ng e
xcha
nge
visit
s con
duct
ed
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
2bn/
=
Gues
t spe
aker
s /e
xper
ts o
n D/
CRM
to sh
are
expe
rienc
es
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel a
nd
gues
t spe
aker
s
Expe
rienc
e be
ing
shar
ed
thro
ugh
gues
t sp
eake
rs in
D/
CRM
Num
ber o
f gue
st
spea
kers
invi
ted
and
wor
ksho
ps
orga
nize
d fo
r D/
CRM
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
500m
/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
42 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
42 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
13 Cros
s Cutti
ng
Issu
es
Obj
ecti v
e 1:
To a
cqui
re
equi
pmen
t for
D/
CRM
acti
viti
es
Gove
rnm
ent a
nd
stak
ehol
ders
to
inve
st in
eq
uipm
ent f
or
prep
ared
ness
an
d re
spon
se –
Ea
rth
mov
ing,
GI
S, A
mbu
lanc
e,
etc.
Fund
s and
eq
uipm
ent
Equi
pmen
t ac
quire
d fo
r D/
CRM
in U
gand
a.
Equi
pmen
t av
aila
bilit
y in
U
gand
a fo
r D/
CRM
OPM
/ Min
istry
of
Wor
ks a
nd
tran
spor
t
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
20 b
n/=
Allo
cate
bud
get
at n
ati o
nal a
nd
dist
rict l
evel
pe
riodi
cally
for
equi
pmen
t
Fund
sBu
dget
s al
loca
ted
for
equi
pmen
t at
nati o
nal a
nd
dist
rict l
evel
Budg
et a
lloca
ted
for e
quip
men
t an
d a
num
ber
of e
quip
men
t ac
quire
d
OPM
/ Min
istry
of
Wor
ks a
nd
tran
spor
t
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
10 b
n/=
Obj
ecti v
e 2:
To st
reng
then
G
ende
r and
D/C
RM
Mai
nstr
eam
ge
nder
in D
/
CRM
pla
nnin
g,
impl
emen
tati o
n an
d m
onito
ring
acro
ss a
ll le
vels
and
by a
ll st
akeh
olde
rs
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Gend
er
mai
nstr
eam
ing
impl
emen
ted
and
stre
ngth
en
Gend
er
mai
nstr
eam
ing
and
acti v
iti es
re
cord
ed a
nd
repo
rted
Min
istry
of
Gen
der
and
soci
al
deve
lopm
ent/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
3 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Gend
er fo
cal
pers
on a
t na
ti ona
l and
co
mm
unity
leve
l to
spec
ifi ca
lly
deal
with
gen
der
rela
ted
issue
s.
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Gend
er fo
cal
pers
ons a
t na
ti ona
l and
lo
cal l
evel
Avai
labi
lity
of
gend
er fo
cal
pers
on a
t na
ti ona
l and
lo
cal l
evel
Min
istry
of
Gen
der
and
soci
al
deve
lopm
ent/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
3 ye
ars
3bn/
=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 43
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 4
3
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Budg
et fo
r ge
nder
–
gove
rnm
ent a
nd
deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Budg
et
allo
cati o
n fo
r gen
der
impr
oved
Reco
rds a
nd
acti v
iti es
fo
r bud
get
allo
cati o
n
Min
istry
of
Gen
der
and
soci
al
deve
lopm
ent/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
5 bn
/=
Trai
n D/
CRM
pr
acti ti
one
rs
in g
ende
r m
ains
trea
min
g
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Trai
ning
in
gen
der
mai
nstr
eam
ing
impl
emen
ted
Num
ber
of tr
aine
d pr
acti ti
one
rs in
ge
nder
and
D/
CRM
Min
istry
of
Gen
der
and
soci
al
deve
lopm
ent/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
2 bn
/=
Rese
arch
on
gend
er a
nd D
/CR
M
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Rese
arch
in
gen
der
mai
nstr
eam
ing
impl
emen
ted
Num
ber o
f op
erati
ona
l re
sear
ches
co
nduc
ted
on
gend
er a
nd D
/CR
M
Min
istry
of
Gen
der
and
soci
al
deve
lopm
ent/
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
1 ye
ar50
0m/=
Obj
ecti v
e 3:
To st
reng
then
Su
stai
nabi
lity
Gove
rnm
ent a
nd
deve
lopm
ent
shou
ld e
nsur
e av
aila
bilit
y of
su
stai
nabi
lity
plan
s in
any
D/CR
M p
roje
ct o
r pr
ogra
mm
e
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Sust
aina
bilit
y pl
ans d
evel
oped
to
impr
oved
su
stai
nabi
lity
Sust
aina
bilit
y pl
ans a
vaila
ble
at a
ll le
vels
for
D/CR
M
OPM
/ Lin
e m
inist
ries
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
2 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Wor
k w
ith lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent i
n im
plem
enti n
g an
d m
onito
ring
proj
ects
/pr
ogra
mm
es
to e
nsur
e su
stai
nabi
lity
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Mon
itorin
g is
impr
oved
to
stre
ngth
en
sust
aina
bilit
y w
ith lo
cal
gove
rnm
ents
Mon
itorin
g ac
ti viti
es
with
loca
l go
vern
men
ts
reco
rded
and
re
port
ed
OPM
/ Lin
e m
inist
ries
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
2bn/
=
The Office of the Prime Minister
44 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
44 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Wor
k w
ith
com
mun
iti es
in
impl
emen
ti ng
and
mon
itorin
g pr
ojec
ts/
prog
ram
mes
to
ens
ure
sust
aina
bilit
y
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Mon
itorin
g is
impr
oved
to
stre
ngth
en
sust
aina
bilit
y w
ith
com
mun
iti es
Mon
itorin
g ac
ti viti
es w
ith
com
mun
iti es
re
cord
ed a
nd
repo
rted
OPM
/ Lin
e m
inist
ries
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
2bn/
=
Exit
stra
tegy
in
any
D/C
RM
proj
ects
and
pr
ogra
mm
e
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Exit
stra
tegi
es
deve
lope
d to
st
reng
then
su
stai
nabi
lity
Avai
labi
lity
of
exit
stra
tegi
es
at n
ati o
nal a
nd
loca
l lev
el
OPM
/ Lin
e m
inist
ries
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
4 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Obj
ecti v
e 4:
To st
reng
then
Cl
imat
e ch
ange
ad
apta
ti on
Trai
n in
CCA
/MFu
nds a
nd
pers
onne
lCl
imat
e Ch
ange
Ad
apta
ti on
st
reng
then
th
roug
h Tr
aini
ng
Num
ber o
f sta
ff an
d tr
aini
ng
cond
ucte
d in
CC
A/M
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
2bn/
=
Budg
et
allo
cati o
n fo
r CC
A/M
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Clim
ate
Chan
ge
Adap
tati o
n
stre
ngth
en
thro
ugh
budg
et
allo
cati o
n
Budg
et a
lloca
ted
and
a nu
mbe
r of
CCA/
M a
cti v
iti es
co
nduc
ted
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
5bn/
=
Ope
rati o
nalis
e an
d po
pula
rize
CCA
Polic
y at
all
leve
ls- n
ati o
nal,
dist
rict a
nd
com
mun
ity le
vel
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Clim
ate
Chan
ge
Adap
tati o
n
stre
ngth
en
thro
ugh
popu
lariz
ati o
n at
nati
ona
l and
lo
cal l
evel
s
Num
ber o
f se
nsiti
zati o
n m
eeti n
gs
cond
ucte
d an
d re
port
s
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
3bn.
=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 45
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 4
5
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Coor
dina
ti on
of
CCA
acti v
iti es
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Clim
ate
Chan
ge
Adap
tati o
n
stre
ngth
en
thro
ugh
coor
dina
ti on
Num
ber o
f co
ordi
nati o
n m
eeti n
gs
cond
ucte
d
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
2bn/
=
Esta
blish
co
mm
unity
st
ruct
ures
for
CCA
to b
uild
co
mm
unity
re
silie
nce
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Clim
ate
Chan
ge
Adap
tati o
n
stre
ngth
en
thro
ugh
esta
blish
ing
com
mun
ity
stru
ctur
es
A nu
mbe
r of
func
ti ona
l co
mm
unity
st
ruct
ures
es
tabl
ished
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
2bn/
=
Rese
arch
in
CCA/
MFu
nds a
nd
pers
onne
lCl
imat
e Ch
ange
Ad
apta
ti on
st
reng
then
th
roug
h re
sear
ch
A nu
mbe
r of
rese
arch
wor
k do
ne
MW
E/O
PMDe
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs, U
N
agen
cies
/ Key
Go
vern
men
t in
sti tu
ti ons
/ N
GOs a
nd p
rivat
e se
ctor
5 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Obj
ecti v
e 5:
To st
reng
then
Ti
mel
y im
plem
enta
ti on-
Early
pr
epar
edne
ss
in te
rms o
f -
hum
an re
sour
ce
fi nan
ce a
nd
equi
pmen
t
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Early
pr
epar
edne
ss
to st
reng
then
ti m
ely
impl
emen
tati o
n of
D/C
RM
acti v
iti es
Impr
oved
le
vel o
f ear
ly
prep
ared
ness
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
5 bn
/=
Emer
genc
y fu
nds,
read
ily
avai
labl
e w
ithou
t any
re
d ta
pes –
bu
reau
crac
y
Fund
s Em
erge
ncy
fund
s to
impr
ove
ti mel
y im
plem
enta
ti on
of D
/CRM
ac
ti viti
es.
Emer
genc
y fu
nds p
asse
d an
d ap
prov
ed
by p
arlia
men
t an
d M
inist
ry o
f Fi
nanc
e.
OPM
/ Min
istry
of
Fin
ance
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
3 ye
ars
10bn
/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
46 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
46 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Budg
et
allo
cati o
n fo
r ear
ly
prep
ared
ness
an
d ea
rly
resp
onse
Fund
s Bu
dget
s mad
e av
aila
ble
to
stre
ngth
en e
arly
pr
epar
edne
ss
and
early
re
spon
se
Budg
et
allo
cati o
n fo
r ear
ly
prep
ared
ness
ac
ti viti
es a
nd
repo
rts
OPM
/ Min
istry
of
Fin
ance
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
3 ye
ars
4bn/
=
Staff
on
stan
d- b
y fo
r em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Staff
rec
ruite
d to
be
on
stan
d-by
fo
r em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
Num
ber o
f st
aff r
ecru
ited
for
emer
genc
y re
spon
se in
U
gand
a
OPM
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
3 ye
ars
2bn/
=
Moti
vati
on
for
staff
wor
king
in
emer
genc
ies
Fund
s and
pe
rson
nel
Moti
vat
ed st
aff
wor
king
in
emer
genc
ies
Leve
l of
emer
genc
y re
spon
se
impr
oved
OPM
/ Lin
e m
inist
ries
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, UN
ag
enci
es/ K
ey
Gove
rnm
ent
insti
tuti o
ns/
NGO
s and
priv
ate
sect
or
5 ye
ars
1bn/
=
Heal
th S
ecto
r CO
MPO
NEN
TKE
Y AC
TIO
NS
REQ
UIR
ED
INPU
TSO
UTP
UTS
IN
DICA
TORS
LE
AD
AGEN
CYCO
NTR
IBU
TIN
G
AGEN
CIES
TIM
E FR
AME
ESTI
MAT
ED
COST
Heal
th se
ctor
co
ordi
nati o
n m
echa
nism
s
Advo
cate
for
stre
ngth
enin
g of
the
Nati
ona
l Pl
atf o
rm o
n D/
CRM
Hold
tabl
e to
p ex
erci
se
with
key
st
akeh
olde
rs
on th
e D/
CRM
Nati
ona
l pl
atf o
rm
Stre
ngth
en D
/CR
M p
latf o
rm
-No
of p
lann
ed
mee
ti ngs
of t
he
wor
king
hel
d
-No
of p
lann
ed
mee
ti ngs
of
platf
orm
hel
d
MO
H/ W
HOO
PM, U
N
agen
cies
, and
N
GOs
5 ye
ars
125m
/=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 47
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 4
7
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Obj
ecti v
e: T
o st
reng
then
the
Min
istr
y of
Hea
lth
to c
oord
inat
e an
d le
ad h
ealth
sect
or
in D
/CRM
Addi
ti ona
l hu
man
re
sour
ces,
fu
ndin
g an
d lo
gisti
cs
to D
RR
depa
rtm
ent o
f M
oH
Iden
ti fy
a sp
ecifi
c offi
ce
spac
e,
pers
onne
l and
eq
uipm
ent
for t
he H
ealth
Di
sast
er
coor
dina
ti on
Incr
ease
d HR
an
d fu
ncti o
nal
coor
dina
ti on
offi c
e
-No
of p
erso
nnel
re
crui
ted
-Spa
ce a
lloca
ted
-Equ
ipm
ent
proc
ured
MO
H/ W
HOO
PM, U
N
agen
cies
, and
N
GOs
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
3 ye
ars
750m
/=
Revi
ew a
nd
stre
amlin
e th
e To
R of
the
Nati
ona
l Disa
ster
Ta
sk F
orce
and
th
e Te
chni
cal
Wor
king
Gro
up
Cond
uct t
able
to
p ex
erci
se to
ha
rmon
ize th
e To
R fo
r the
task
an
d Te
chni
cal
wor
king
Gro
up
Stre
amlin
e To
R fo
r NTF
and
TW
G
Stre
amlin
ed To
R fo
r NTF
and
TW
GM
OH
WHO
, OPM
1 ye
ar25
0m/=
Desig
nate
te
chni
cal f
ocal
pe
rson
for
heal
th d
isast
er
man
agem
ent
at th
e Di
stric
t He
alth
Offi
ce
Iden
ti fy
appr
opria
te
tech
nica
l sta
ff w
ithin
the
DHT
Issu
es
assig
nmen
t le
tt er w
ith c
lear
To
R
Prov
ide
mot
orcy
cle
for
coor
dina
ti on,
as
sess
men
ts
and
data
co
llecti
on
Func
ti ona
l offi
ceAs
signm
ent
lett e
r of t
he fo
cal
pers
on
Com
mun
ity
linka
ge
esta
blish
ed
No
of p
erso
ns
assig
ned
No
of m
otor
cycl
es
proc
ured
DHO
MO
H, M
OLG
W
HO, N
GOs,
De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs
3 ye
ars
500m
/=
2.5b
n/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
48 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
48 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Stre
ngth
en th
e lin
kage
bet
wee
n na
ti ona
l an
d di
stric
t/su
b na
ti ona
l co
ordi
nati o
n m
echa
nism
s
HR Dial
ogue
Logi
sti c
s
Fram
ewor
k fo
r re
porti
ng
Repo
rti ng
ch
anne
lRe
port
s of
supe
rvisi
on
Min
utes
of
mee
ti ngs
hel
d
MO
HM
oLG,
NGO
s5
year
s62
5m/=
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
3. H
ealth
Em
erge
ncy
Risk
As
sess
men
t and
In
form
ati o
n M
anag
emen
t
Obj
ecti v
e:
To st
reng
then
an
ear
ly w
arni
ng
syst
em b
ased
on
risk
anal
ysis
and
m
appi
ng
Cond
uct r
egul
ar
heal
th se
ctor
risk
an
d vu
lner
abili
ty
asse
ssm
ent a
nd
map
ping
Adap
t as
sess
men
t to
ols
Cond
uct
asse
ssm
ent
Cond
uct h
azar
d m
appi
ng
Com
pile
resu
lts
Prep
are
repo
rt
Diss
emin
ate
the
repo
rt
Up
to d
ate
haza
rd p
rofi l
e an
d m
appi
ng
All h
azar
d m
appi
ng
cond
ucte
d
All h
azar
d m
apM
OH
WHO
/OPM
, M
OLG
and
pa
rtne
rs
5 ye
ars
1.25
bn/=
Supp
ort
stre
ngth
enin
g of
th
e ID
SR sy
stem
to
impr
ove
ti mel
ines
s and
co
mpl
eten
ess
of re
porti
ng
espe
cial
ly in
di
sast
er p
rone
ar
eas
Iden
ti fy
gaps
in
IDSR
Hold
revi
ew
mee
ti ngs
to
addr
ess t
he
gaps
Inte
nsify
su
perv
ision
IDSR
gap
an
alys
is re
port
Tim
ely
and
com
plet
e re
port
s
Gap
anal
ysis
repo
rtM
OH
WHO
and
oth
er
deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
1 ye
ar37
5m/=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 49
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 4
9
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Build
cap
acity
of
MO
H, d
istric
ts
and
rele
vant
he
alth
par
tner
s fo
r ini
ti al
rapi
d he
alth
as
sess
men
t
Cond
uct
trai
ning
nee
ds
asse
ssm
ent
Cond
uct
trai
ning
Deve
lop
D/CR
M
staff
ros
ter
Follo
w u
p th
e tr
aine
es
Trai
ning
Nee
ds
iden
ti fi e
d
Data
base
of
trai
ned
staff
de
velo
ped
Trai
ning
Nee
ds
asse
ssm
ent r
epor
t
Data
base
of
trai
ned
staff
Avai
labi
lity
of
Com
mitt
ed te
am
on D
/CRM
MO
H/ W
HOO
PM, U
N
agen
cies
, NGO
s2
year
s1.
25bn
/=
Stre
ngth
en
com
mun
ity
base
d di
seas
e su
rvei
llanc
e w
ith
incl
usio
n of
D/
CRM
Cond
uct
trai
ning
nee
ds
asse
ssm
ent
Cond
uct
trai
ning
o th
e VH
Ts
Stan
dard
the
repo
rti ng
tool
Prov
ide
ince
nti v
es fo
r th
e CB
DS
Hold
qua
rter
ly
revi
ew
mee
ti ngs
Trai
ning
nee
ds
iden
ti fi e
d
Trai
ning
of t
he
CBDs
con
duct
ed
Qua
rter
ly re
view
m
eeti n
gs h
eld
CBDS
moti
vat
ed
to d
o ID
SR
Trai
ning
nee
ds
asse
ssm
ent r
epor
t
Trai
ning
repo
rt
Min
utes
of t
he
mee
ti ng
Wel
l fun
cti o
ning
CB
DS sy
stem
MO
HW
HO,
Deve
lopm
ent
Part
ners
3 ye
ars
5bn/
=
750m
/=
625m
/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
50 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
50 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Stre
ngth
en
the
diag
nosti
c
capa
city
of
labo
rato
ries i
n th
e co
untr
y an
d ne
twor
k w
ith
othe
r reg
iona
l la
bora
torie
s.
Cond
uct
inve
ntor
y of
av
aila
ble
lab
equi
pmen
t and
su
pplie
s
Proc
ure
equi
pmen
ts
Trai
ning
of
labo
rato
ry st
aff
at re
gion
al a
nd
dist
rict
Supp
ort
ship
men
t of
spec
imen
and
fe
edba
ck
Equi
pmen
t gap
id
enti fi
ed
and
fi led
Lab
staff
tra
ined
Inve
ntor
y re
port
Trai
ning
repo
rt
MO
HW
HO,
Deve
lopm
ent
part
ners
, Wor
ld
Bank
5 ye
ars
5bn/
=
1.87
5bn
2.5b
n/=
625m
/=
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
4. R
espo
nse
and
Reco
very
Pla
nnin
g
Obj
ecti v
es:
To e
nsur
e a
coor
dina
ted,
ti m
ely
and
eff e
cti v
e re
spon
se b
ased
on
an a
ll ha
zard
who
le
heal
th a
ppro
ach
To e
nsur
e a
ti mel
y re
cove
ry o
f the
he
alth
syst
em p
ost
disa
ster
Com
pile
and
re
view
exi
sti n
g ha
zard
pla
ns
to id
enti f
y w
eakn
esse
s in
the
plan
s and
to
iden
ti fy
thos
e no
t in
exist
ence
in
the
plan
s
Stoc
k ta
king
av
aila
ble
haza
rd
plan
s
Revi
ew th
e av
aila
ble
plan
s
Haza
rd sp
ecifi
c pl
ans d
evel
oped
Com
mun
ity
cons
ulte
d in
th
e m
appi
ng
proc
ess
Upd
ated
Dise
ase
spec
ifi c
haza
rd
plan
s
Cons
ulta
ti on
repo
rt
MO
HW
HO, O
PM,
NGO
s1
year
250m
/=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 51
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 5
1
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Deve
lop
all
heal
th H
azar
d di
sast
er
oper
ati o
nal
plan
s bas
ed
on h
ealth
risk
as
sess
men
ts a
nd
map
ping
Deve
lop
a al
l ha
zard
pla
ns
for n
ati o
nal a
nd
dist
rict
New
and
U
pdat
ed p
lans
de
velo
ped
for d
istric
ts
and
nati o
nal
resp
onse
All h
azar
d pl
anM
OH
WHO
, OPM
, U
NDP
, NGO
s2
year
s50
0m/=
Deve
lop
conti
nge
ncy
and
Busin
ess
Conti
nui
ty P
lans
fo
r prio
rity
cond
iti on
s an
d co
nduc
t ta
ble
top
and
simul
ati o
n ex
erci
ses
Cond
uct
stak
ehol
ders
m
eeti n
g on
co
nti n
genc
y an
d bu
sines
s co
nti n
uity
pl
anni
ng
Plan
and
co
nduc
t ta
ble
top
and
simul
ati o
n ex
erci
ses
Nati
ona
l co
nti n
genc
y pl
an a
nd h
azar
d sp
ecifi
c BC
Ps
Skill
ed a
nd
read
y he
alth
st
aff
Conti
nge
ncy
plan
do
cum
ent
BCP
docu
men
t
MO
HW
HO, O
PM,
NGO
s 5
year
s1.
25bn
/=
5. R
espo
nse
and
Reco
very
O
pera
ti ons
To im
prov
e he
alth
se
ctor
resp
onse
and
re
cove
ry c
apac
ity.
Stre
ngth
en th
e pr
e ho
spita
l em
erge
ncy
refe
rral
and
am
bula
nce
serv
ices
in th
e di
sast
er p
rone
ar
eas b
ased
on
VRAM
Initi
al
ambu
lanc
e an
d pr
e-ho
spita
l re
ferr
al sy
stem
Proc
ure
requ
ired
equi
pmen
t
Trai
ning
hea
lth
wor
kers
Plan
s dev
elop
ed
for a
mbu
lanc
e sy
stem
Equi
pmen
ts
proc
ured
Heal
th w
orke
rs
trai
ned
Ambu
lanc
e an
d pr
e ho
spita
l pla
n
Equi
pmen
t in
vent
ory
Trai
ning
repo
rt
MO
HW
HO, M
oLG,
U
NDP
5 ye
ars
2.5b
n/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
52 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
52 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
Build
cap
acity
on
D/CR
M in
clud
ing
mas
s cas
ualty
m
anag
emen
t
Trai
ning
and
eq
uipm
ent
need
s as
sess
men
t
Proc
ure
equi
pmen
t
Esta
blish
a
med
ical
em
erge
ncy
com
man
d ce
ntre
Trai
ning
and
eq
uipm
ent
need
s ide
nti fi
ed
Equi
pmen
t pr
ocur
ed
Med
ical
em
erge
ncy
com
man
d ce
ntre
es
tabl
ished
Trai
ning
and
eq
uipm
ent n
eeds
re
port
Inve
ntor
y
Func
ti ona
l m
edic
al
emer
genc
y co
mm
and
cent
re
MO
HW
HO5
year
s1.
25bn
/=
1.25
bn/=
625m
/=
Crea
te a
n ea
sy a
cces
s to
em
erge
ncy
fund
s at n
ati o
nal
leve
l tha
t sho
uld
be re
plen
ished
ev
ery
year
Emer
genc
y fu
nd
An e
mer
genc
y fu
nd e
asily
ac
cess
ed d
urin
g em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
Prop
orti o
n of
em
erge
ncie
s re
spon
der t
o w
ithin
48
to 7
2 ho
urs
MO
HU
NDP
, OPM
2 ye
ars
5bn/
=
Deve
lop
SOPs
fo
r em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
Fina
nce
Stak
ehol
der
Mee
ti ngs
Criti
cal s
teps
an
d pr
oced
ures
ar
e cl
arifi
ed a
nd
follo
wed
dur
ing
emer
genc
y re
spon
se
SOP
for t
he h
ealth
se
ctor
M
OH
WHO
, OPM
, De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs
2 ye
ars
500m
/=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 53
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent C
apac
ity A
sses
smen
t | 5
3
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d M
anag
emen
t
Esta
blish
m
echa
nism
s for
pr
epos
iti on
ing
and
man
agin
g es
senti
al
supp
lies f
or
disa
ster
s
Esta
blish
re
gion
al a
nd
nati o
nal
war
ehou
se
for d
isast
er
resp
onse
Cond
uct
inve
ntor
y of
ess
enti a
l su
pplie
s fo
r disa
ster
m
anag
emen
t
Proc
ure
and
prep
ositi
on
the
esse
nti a
l m
edic
ines
and
su
pplie
s at
nati o
nal a
nd
stra
tegi
c ce
ntre
Regi
onal
w
areh
ouse
bui
ld
and
refu
rbish
ed
Proc
ure
and
prep
ositi
on
esse
nti a
l su
pplie
s
Com
miss
ioni
ng
repo
rt
Inve
ntor
y
MO
HW
HO, N
GOs,
De
velo
pmen
t pa
rtne
rs
2 ye
ars
625m
/=
125/
=
5bn/
=
Build
surg
e ca
paci
ty a
nd
deve
lop
BCP
Cond
uct s
urge
ca
paci
ty n
eeds
as
sess
men
t
Esta
blish
a
surg
e ca
paci
ty
com
man
d ce
ntre
Cond
uct d
istric
t sp
ecifi
c tr
aini
ng
Surg
e ca
paci
ty
need
s ide
nti fi
ed
Func
ti ona
l sur
ge
capa
city
team
Trai
ning
s co
nduc
ted
Surg
e ne
eds
asse
ssm
ent r
epor
t
Func
ti ona
l sur
ge
capa
city
team
Repo
rt
MO
HW
HO, N
GOs
3 ye
ars
500/
=
2.5b
n/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
54 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
54 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
The
Offic
e of
the
Prim
e M
inis
ter
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
6. C
omm
unity
Su
ppor
t Pr
ogra
mm
es
Obj
ecti v
e:
To st
reng
then
co
mm
unity
supp
ort
prog
ram
s on
D/CR
M
Incl
ude
D/CR
M
into
the
trai
ning
m
anua
l and
ToR
of th
e VH
Ts
Revi
ew th
e tr
aini
ng
curr
icul
um o
f th
e tr
aini
ng
insti
tuti o
ns
Cond
uct o
n jo
b tr
aini
ng fo
r in
serv
ice
staff
.
Trai
ning
in
sti tu
ti on
curr
icul
um
revi
ewed
On
job
trai
ning
s co
nduc
ted
New
cur
ricul
um
incl
usiv
e of
DRN
Trai
ning
repo
rt
MO
HW
HO, D
istric
ts,
MO
LG, N
GOs
3 ye
ars
1.25
bn/=
Supp
ort N
GOs
to st
reng
then
th
e he
alth
co
mpo
nent
of
the
existi
ng
D/CR
M
inte
rven
ti ons
an
d if
poss
ible
ex
pand
co
vera
ge o
f the
in
terv
enti o
ns
to o
ther
ge
ogra
phic
al
area
s
Cond
uct
nati o
nal
asse
ssm
ent o
f N
GOs i
nvol
ved
in h
ealth
sect
or
D/CR
M
Cond
uct t
able
to
p ex
erci
se to
bu
ild c
onse
nsus
of
rollo
ut o
f D/
CRM
NGO
D/C
RM
parti
cipa
ti on
asse
ssm
ent
cond
ucte
d
Asse
ssm
ent
repo
rt
Stre
amlin
ed
D/CR
M
impl
emen
tati o
ns
in th
e co
untr
y
Tabl
e to
p re
port
MO
HU
NDP
, MO
LG,
Deve
lopm
ent
Part
ners
5 ye
ars
1.25
bn/=
500m
/=
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 55
COM
PON
ENT
KEY
ACTI
ON
SRE
QU
IRED
IN
PUTS
RESU
LTS
INDI
CATO
RS
LEAD
AG
ENCY
CON
TRIB
UTI
NG
AG
ENCI
ESTI
ME
FRAM
EES
TIM
ATED
CO
ST
7. S
afer
and
Pr
epar
ed H
ospi
tals
an
d He
alth
Fac
iliti e
s
Obj
ecti v
e:
To e
nsur
e sa
fety
an
d se
curit
y of
he
alth
wor
kers
and
he
alth
faci
liti e
s du
ring
disa
ster
Crea
te
awar
enes
s am
ong
heal
th
wor
kers
, m
anag
ers
and
part
ners
ab
out s
afe
and
prep
ared
he
alth
faci
liti e
s in
iti ati
ve
Deve
lop
a sa
fe
and
prep
ared
he
alth
faci
lity
st
rate
gy
Roll
out t
he
Safe
and
pr
epar
ed
heal
th fa
cilit
y st
rate
gy
Safe
and
pr
epar
ed h
ealth
fa
cilit
y pr
epar
ed
Avai
labi
lity
of
know
ledg
eabl
e he
alth
staff
in
safe
and
pr
epar
ed h
ealth
fa
cilit
y st
rate
gy
Safe
and
pre
pare
d he
alth
faci
lity
stra
tegy
Hosp
ital s
afe
inde
x re
port
MO
HW
HO, M
OLG
, N
GOs
5 ye
ars
1.25
bn/=
250m
/=
Deve
lop
plan
fo
r rol
ling
out t
he sa
fe
and
prep
ared
ho
spita
l and
he
alth
faci
liti e
s pr
ogra
m
Cond
uct
plan
ning
m
eeti n
gs
Deve
lop
a sa
fe
and
prep
ared
he
alth
faci
lity
rolli
ng p
lan
Mee
ti ngs
co
nduc
ted
with
ac
ti on
poin
ts
Rollo
ut p
lan
deve
lope
d
Min
utes
Safe
and
pre
pare
d he
alth
faci
lity
plan
MO
HW
HO, M
OLG
, N
GOs,
Wor
ld
Bank
5 ye
ars
1.25
bn/=
The Office of the Prime Minister
56 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Annexes
Annex 1: Data Collection Instruments
Annex 1.1: Questionnaire
1.0 Introducti on
The Nati onal Platf orm on Disaster Risk Reducti on, under the leadership of the Offi ce of the Prime Minister commissioned the conduct of a Disaster and Climate Risk Management (D/CRM) Capacity Assessment in Uganda. The assessment is being undertaken by Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health with support from the United Nati ons Development Programme.
The aim of the study is to assess the Disaster/Climate Risk Management capacity in Uganda and develop a capacity development plan for Government and development partners.
We kindly request you to give your answers to all the questi ons. All the informati on provided shall be treated with outmost confi denti ality and your parti cipati on is completely voluntary. You may choose not to parti cipate in this process, though your experiences will be very much appreciated.
Please fi ll in the blank spaces provided. Circle where necessary and choose only one opti on by ti cking (√) in the box corresponding to your level of agreement or disagreement, following the scale of 1-5, whereby 1 is very Low scoring factor (Very Low rati ng) and 5 the Highest factor (Very High rati ng), to quanti tati vely measure the existi ng Disaster Risk Management Capacity in your organizati on.
Consent
I agree to parti cipate in the assessment
Name ______________________________
Signed______________________________ Date ______________________________________
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 57
2.0 Respondents/Insti tuti on Background
Q201. Questi onnaire number______________ Q202. Date of completi on__________________
Q203. Name of Interviewer ___________________________________________________
Q204. Title of respondent _____________________________________________________
Q205. Organizati on of respondent:______________________________________________
Q206. Sex of respondent, circle appropriate [1]. Male [2.] Female
Q207. Respondents qualifi cati on ( circle appropriate)
[a]. Diploma [b]. Bachelors [c]. Masters [d]. PhD
The Office of the Prime Minister
58 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Assessment Domains
Questi ons Rati ng levels
[1]Enabling Environment Capacity
Variables 1.Very low (Non functi onal capaciti es)
2. Low(Less functi onal)
3. Moderate(Functi oning with some defi ciency)
4.High (Functi oning above average)
5.Very High
(Fully functi onal)
Policy Q301. Capacity to develop policies/ frameworks pertaining to Disaster Risk Management
Financial Q302. Budget for Disaster Risk Management is being allocated
Q303. The budget for Disaster Risk Management is being used appropriately
Q304. Capacity to infl uence legal and regulatory frameworks at nati onal level.
Q305. Capacity to infl uence legal and regulatory frameworks at district/local.
Qn306. Advocacy capacity
Qn308. Functi onal Standard Operati on Procedure (SOP)
Stakeholder engagement
Qn307. Stakeholders engagement /networking/lessons sharing
Research Qn308.Research work has been done by your organizati on regarding D/CRM/ CCA
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 59
Monitoring and Evaluati on
Qn309. Monitoring and Evaluati on Mechanism for D/CRM in your organizati on is fully functi onal
Challenges
Recommendati ons
[2] Organizati onal Capacity
Variables 1.Very low 2.Low 3.Moderate 4.High 5.Very High
Preparedness capacity in your organisati on
Q401.Early warning system,
Q402. Conti ngency planning
Q403. Awareness creati on
Q 404. Human resource training
Miti gati on capacity in your organisati on
Q404. Community-based Disaster Risk Reducti on
Q405. Livelihoods resilience
Q406. Environmental Resource Management
Q407.Risk transfer mechanisms/micro insurance
Q407.Hazards, Risk and vulnerability assessment
Q408. Research and knowledge management
The Office of the Prime Minister
60 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Response capacity to emergencies
Q410. Rapid Assessment
Q411.Emergency Response to save lives
Rehabilitati on/Recovery capacity
Q412. Needs assessment
Q413. Resett lement initi ati ves
Cross cutti ng
Coordinati on Q412. Coordinati on capacity
Informati on management System
Q413. Informati on management System and disseminati on capacity
Timely implementati on
Q414. Implementati on of D/CRM acti viti es ti mely
Equipment Q415. Equipment for D/CRM acti viti es
Gender Q416. Gender and D/CRM being implemented
Resource Mobilizati on
Q417. Resource Mobilizati on and fund raising for D/CRM
Q418. Organizati onal capacity to deal with Climate Change and Adapti on programming
Sustainability Q419. Sustainability plan
Any challenges
Recommendati ons
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 61
Individual Level Capacity Domains
Variables 1.Very low
2.Low 3.Moderate 4.High 5.Very High
Human Resources Q501. Presence/number of qualifi ed/ trained staff specifi cally for Disaster Risk Management.
Q502. Capacity for Disaster Risk Management in terms of specialized Human Resources in your organizati on in the various sectors. (health/nutriti on engineering/WASH, educati on, livelihoods, etc)
Skills and Knowledge Q503. Individuals with skills and knowledge in Preparedness
Q504. Individuals with skills and knowledge in Miti gati on,
Q505. Individuals with skills and knowledge in Response
Q506. Individuals with skills and knowledge in Rehabilitati on
Challenges
What recommendati ons do you propose to improve individual capacity
The Office of the Prime Minister
62 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
6.0 Lessons Learnt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.0 Overall Disaster/Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment
Very Low Low Moderate High Very High
1 2 3 4 5
Domains Score Reasons
D/CRM Capacity Domains 1 2 3 4 5
1. Enabling Environment level capacity
2. Insti tuti onal /organizati onal level capacity
3 Individual level capacity
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 63
Annex 1.2: Key Informant Interview GuideThe Nati onal Platf orm on Disaster Risk Reducti on, under the leadership of the Offi ce of the Prime Minister, commissioned a Disaster Risk Management (D/CRM) Capacity Assessment. with the aim assessing the D/CRM Capacity of stakeholders in Uganda and develop a D/CRM Capacity development plan for the country. The assessment is being undertaken by Makerere University School of Public Health with support from the United Nati ons Development Programme.
Qn 1: Has your organizati on got qualifi ed staff in the fi eld of D/CRM? (Probe: capacity in terms of Human Resources, Number, areas of specializati on, and sectors).
Qn2: Would you please tell us about budgetary allocati on for D/CRM acti viti es in your organizati on? [Probe: Proporti on of budget for various categories of D/CRM acti viti es; adequacy, main sources of funds and uti lizati on.
Qn 3: Has your organizati on got D/CRM framework or policies to guide implementati on? [Probe: The kinds of frameworks/Policies? Is it possible to share a copy with us? The D/CRM framework is based on nati onal policies or policies developed by your organizati on? )
Qn 4: What are your views about Disaster Risk Management capacity in your organizati on and in the country in terms of:
a) Preparedness (Probe Early warning system, Conti ngency planning and Awareness creati on) (b) Miti gati on(Community-based DRR, Livelihoods resilience, Environmental Resource Management, Risk transfer, etc.. (c) Response (Rapid Assessment, Emergency Response to save lives etc..(d) Rehabilitati on/Recovery.(Needs assessment, resett lement etc..)
(Probe: What each of this acti vity in their respecti ve categories)
Qn 5: Do you have a Monitoring and Evaluati on mechanism for D/CRM being implemented in your organizati on? (Probe: If there is a framework for M&E, budget, personnel e.t.c)
Qn 6: How do you gauge your Organizati onal capacity to deal with Climate Change and Adaptati on programming? (Probe Current acti viti es/projects, personnel, budget etc)
Qn 7: What is your organizati on`s capacity to conduct Hazards, Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (HVCA). (Probe capability of human resources, other resources including fi nances, logisti cs etc )
Qn 8: Is your organizati on involved in any D/CRM/CCA research and knowledge management? (Probe topic/ themati c areas of research done, funding sources, partners, research outputs, locati on of studies etc)
Qn 9: What is your Organizati on’s capacity pertaining to D/CRM in the following areas.a) Coordinati on
b) Informati on management System and disseminati on
c) Advocacy
d) Stakeholders engagement /lessons sharing
e) Delivery of D/CRM acti viti es ti mely
The Office of the Prime Minister
64 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
f) Equipment for D/CRM
g) Gender and D/CRM
h) Sustainability
Qn 10: What challenges do your organizati on have regarding capacity for D/CRM? (Probe: Challenges in various domains e.g. human resources, fi nances, logisti cs,)
Qn 11: What lessons have you learnt regarding D/CRM in organsati on? (Probe: Challenges in the following areas Preparedness, Miti gati on, Response, Rehabilitati on/Recovery)
Qn 12: What recommendati ons can you give to improve D/CRM capacity at nati onal and local level (Probe (a) at nati onal/central government,( c) district/local level?.
Thank you so much for your ti me and availing us this opportunity to discuss with you.
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 65
Annex 2: List of Respondents and Institutions
Name Positi on Organisati on1. Maj. Gen Oketa Julius Director OPM MDP&M2. Mr Innocent Komakech Nati onal Programme offi cer WHO3. Mrs Abenaitwe Lydia Human Resource offi cer IHSU4. Mr Ocheng Titus Lecturer HSU5. Mr. Segujja Farouq Lab Technologist IHSU6. Mr. Mwambi Bashir Lab Technologist IHSU7. Proff Nduguste Dean IHSU8. Dr. Micheal Lukwiya Nati onal Programme offi cer WHO9. Dr. Emmnuel Tenywa Nati onal Programme offi cer WHO10. Mr Patrick Wokorach Programme assistant WHO11. Mr Omony William George Meteorologist Meteorology12. Mr. Mawanda S. Senior Programme offi cer URCS13. Mr. Waboyo Vincent Principle Disaster Mgt offi cer OPM14. Mr. Isaac Bwire Programme Manager IIRR15. Mr. Richard Okuku Economist ULGA16. Dr. Steven Kisaka Ass lecturer MUK17. Mr. Zakmumpa Henry College Registrar MUK18. Mr. Kokas Ikwop Lecturer MUK19. Dr. Paul Ssajjakambwe Ass. Lecturer MUK20. Mr Elungat Solomon Senior Management Disaster Off OPM21. Mr. Ochaya Enid DRR Management Disaster offi cer WV22. Mrs Ochwo Julian Livelihood Programme advisor Goal23. Mr. Ogwang Jimmy Disaster Management offi cer OPM24. Dr. Chistopher G Orach Deputy Dean MUK25. Dr Primo Madraa Nati onal Programme offi cer UNFPA26. Mr Julius Kasozi RH offi cer UNHCR27. Mr. Odong Marti n Disaster Management offi cer OPM28. Mr. Pascal Onegiu Okello Programme offi cer UNDP29. Mrs. Joyce Babirye PRO OPM30. Mrs Juliet Ssekandi DRR Specialist UNICEF31. Mr Ogwang Bernard Chief Administrati ve Offi cer Gulu 32. Dr. Onek Paul DHO Gulu33. Mr Mugerwa Z Ass Commissioner MAAIF34. Mr Nobert N. Jiga Deputy Director Administrati on KCCA35. Mrs. Jamuna Rotstein Community Resilience Director URCS36. Mrs Santa odear Ass CAO GULU37. Dr Joseph Sengoza SMO MOH38. Mrs Arinaitwe Joanita Social Scienti sts MW&E39. Mr Japer Okello Team Leader DANCHURCH
The Office of the Prime Minister
66 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Annex 3: List of Participants, Validation Workshop
S/N Name Organisati on Telephone Email1 Beatrice Okello FAO 0776502504 Beatrice.okello@fao.org
2 Z. Muyaka MAAIF 0752966955 Zac._muyaka@hotmail.com
3 Firmina Acuba Ministry of Water and Environment
0752625837 Firmina.acuba@mwe.go.ug
4 Gilbert Anguyo UNDP 0716005145 Gilbert.anguyo@undp.org
5 Jasper Okello Danchurch Aid 0772962676 jaok@dca.dk
6 John Musinguzi Danchurch Aid 0774910954 jomu@dca.dk
7 Veronica Nakijoba Makerere University
0772890511 vnakijoba@yahoo.com
8 Jamuna Protstein URCS 0756652083 votsteinJ@yahoomail.com
9 Nobert Jiga KCCA 0794660158 njiga@kcca.go.ug
10 Denisse Alfaro CRS 0772767740 Denisse.alfaro@crs.org
11 Eva Wamala NEMA 077770933 Emutongole@nema.ug.org
12 Booker M. Ajwoga ADRA 0772506297 booker@adrauganda.org
13 Mpalanyi Bbosa Nati onal curriculum Devt Centre (MOES)
0772510172 fl ompalanyi@yahoo.com
14 Bwailisa Christi ne URCS 0776312058 cbwailisa@redcross.ug.org
15 Tumuramwe Pelgia Parliamentary Forum on DRR
0782854030 upfdrr@parliament.go.ug
16 Pascal Onegiu Okello
UNDP 0772710771 Pascal.okello@undp.org
17 Sophie Kutegeka IUCN Uganda 0772610061 Sophie.kutegeka@iucn.org
18 Akorikiro Francis Acti onAID 0774921733 Francis.akorikiro@acti onaid
19 Dr. Michael Lukwiya
WHO 0704733551 lukwiyam@who.nl
20 Dr. Esther Namukose Muwanguzi
MOH 0772854150 Preciousmuwanguzi@yahoo.ca
21 Eng. F.I.M sssozi MAAIF 0712859758 Frederickssozi2000@yahoo.com
22 Mugera Stella ULGA 0414347575 stellamugera@yahoo.com
23 Menya Gerald OPM 0772410252 geraldmenya@yahoo.com
24 Kaliisa Robert IIRR 0782233139 Robert.kaliisa@iirr.org
25 Victor Igbokwe IIRR 0773932957 victorigbokwe@iirr.org
26 Bwire Patrick CECORE 0772476569 bppatrick@yahoo.com
27 Obbo John CECORE 077264905528 Laz Ocira Associate
Consultant0772424691 Laz.ocira@yahoo.co.uk
29 Prof. Orach Garimoi Christopher
Lead Consultant 0772511444 cgorach@musph.ac.ug
30 Henry Komakech Researcher 0712262182 hkomakech@musph.ac.ug 31 Olivia Nakisita Makerere
University0772845818 onakisita@musph.ac.ug
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 67
Annex 4: List of Participants, Dissemination Workshop
No NAME ORGANISATION TELEPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS
1 Cyprian Dhikusooka OPM/Chairperson 0772461080 Cyprian_dhikusooka@yahoo.com
2 Laz Ocira MaK-SPH 0772424691 Laz.ocira@yahoo.co.uk
3 Enid K.Ocaya World Vision 0753668727 EnidK_ocaya@wvi.org
4 Dr Solomon Fisseha WHO 0772721977 woletsadiks@who.int
5 Nyangoma Immaculate
OPM/Secretary 0782902280 trudy8431@yahoo.co.uk
6 Gilbert Anguyo UNDP 0716005145 gilbertanguyo@undp.org
7 Mariela Guajardo IOM mguajardo@iom.int
8 Jose Manzano OPM/UNDP Jose.manzano@undp.org
9 Nakileza Bob MUK 0782420344 nakilezab@yahoo.com
10 Yazidhi Bamutaze MUK 0772696751 yazidhibamutaze@gmail.com
11 Booker M.Ajuoga ADRA Uganda 0772506297 booker@adrauganda.org
12 Kajumba Joseph MoES 0772307948 jbkajumba@yahoo.co.uk
13 Joyce Babirye OPM 0752693689 Jbabirye30@yahoo.com
14 Adong David Caritas Uganda 0750685331 davidad440@gmail .com
15 Okwi John Bosco Caritas Moroto 075378635 okwijohbosco@yahoo.com
16 Obai Isaac ACTED 0759099393 isaac.obai@acted.org
17 Odong Marti n OPM 0783458054 Ikwap_e@yahoo.com
18 Oti m Fausti ne Charles Obeke
Meteorology 07122013010 charlesobeke@yahoo.co.uk
19 Juliet Ssekandi UNICEF jssekandi@unicef.org
20 Pascal Onegiu Okello
UNDP 0772710771 pascal.okello@undp.org
21 Deus Senzira MAAIF 0752958848 nirideus@yahoo.com
22 Asp.Mwijuka Rhodgers
Uganda Police 0702918004 rhojah@gmail.com
23 Elungat Solomon OPM 0782070076 elungats@yahoo.com
24 Hakuza A MAAIF 0772479309 maaifewu@yahoo.co.uk
25 Ogwang Jimmy OPM 0774563788 ogwangjimmy20@gmail.com
26 Woboya Vicent OPM 0772347518 woboyavicent@yahoo.com
27 Eng.F I M.Ssozi MAAIF 0712859758 frederickssozi@yahoo.com
28 Kirungi Raymond OPM 0782056754 nungiray@gmail.com
29 Nakisita Olivia MaK-SPH 0772845818 onakisitae@gmail.com
30 Prof Christopher Garimoi Orach
MaK-SPH 0772511444 cgorach@musph.ac.ug
The Office of the Prime Minister
68 | Disaster and Climate Risk Management and Capacity assessment
Annex 5: List of Documents Reviewed
1. UNDP, (2008). Capacity Assessment Framework Policy. htt p://europeandcis.undp.org/uploads/public/File/Capacity_Development_Regional_Training/UNDP_Capacity_Assessment_Users_Guide_MAY_2007.pdf
2. Nati onal Policy for Disaster Preparedness and Management, (2010) Directorate of Relief, Disaster
Preparedness and Refugees, Offi ce of the Prime Minister. htt p://www.preventi onweb.net/fi les/21032_ugandanati onalpolicyfordisasterprep.pdf
3. MOH/WHO (2012). Improving Disaster Risk Management (D/CRM) in the Health Sector of Uganda; Country Health D/CRM Capacity Assessment.
4. URCS, The Uganda Red Cross Strategic plan 2011 – 2015, htt p://www.redcrossug.org/Uganda%20Red%20Cross%20Strategic%20Plan%202011-2015.pdf
5. Uganda Local government Associati on Working paper
6. UNISDR (2006), Hyogo Framework for Acti on 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nati ons and communiti es to disasters. htt p://www.unisdr.org/fi les/1037_hyogoframeworkforacti onenglish.pdf
7. Leoni, Brigitt e; Radford, Tim; Schulman, Mark, Disaster through a Diff erent Lens: Behind Every Eff ect, There is a Cause (2011). United Nati ons Offi ce for Disaster Risk Reducti on (UNISDR). htt p://www.unisdr.
org/fi les/20108_mediabook.pdf
8. GoU/UNDP (2013). Insti tuti onal Capacity Needs Assessment Report for Climate Risk Management in Uganda.
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 69
69 |
Disa
ster
and
Clim
ate
Risk
Man
agem
ent a
nd C
apac
ity a
sses
smen
t
Ann
ex 6
: H
yogo
Fra
mew
ork
of A
ctio
n, 2
00
5-2
015
Expe
cted
out
com
e, s
trate
gic
goal
s an
d pr
iorit
ies
for a
ctio
n 20
05 -
2015
Expe
cted
out
com
e
Stra
tegi
c G
oals
Prio
ritie
s fo
r Act
ion
Cros
s Cu
tting
Issu
es
Deve
lopme
nt an
d stre
ngthe
ning o
f insti
tution
s,me
chan
isms a
nd ca
pacit
ies to
build
resil
ience
to ha
zards
.Th
e sys
temati
c inc
orpora
tion o
f risk
redu
ction
appro
ache
s int
o the
the i
mplem
entat
ion of
emerg
ency
prep
aredn
ess,
respo
nse a
nd re
cove
ry pro
gramm
es
The s
ubsta
ncial
redu
ction
of di
saste
r, in l
ives a
nd in
the s
ocial
,ec
onom
ic an
d env
ironm
ental
asse
sts of
comm
unitie
s and
coun
tries
Gend
er pe
rspec
tive a
nd cu
ltura
l dive
rsity
Comm
unity
and v
olunte
ers p
artic
ipatio
n
Contributing to the achievements of the internationally agreed development goals (including the MDGs)
Capa
city b
uildin
g & te
chno
logy t
rans
fer
5. St
reng
then d
isaste
r pre
pare
dnes
sfor
effec
tive r
espo
nse a
t all l
evels
D
isaste
r man
agem
ent c
apac
ities:
polic
y, tec
hnica
l and
insit
ution
al ca
pacit
ies
Dial
ogue
, coo
rdina
tion &
infor
matio
n ex
chan
ge be
twee
n disa
ster m
anag
ers
and d
evelo
pmen
t sec
tors
R
egion
al ap
proa
ches
to di
saste
r re
spon
se, w
ith ris
k red
uctio
n foc
us
Rev
iew &
and e
xerci
se pr
epar
edne
ss
and c
ontin
genc
y plan
s
Eme
rgen
cy fu
nds
Vo
luntar
ism &
partic
ipatio
n
4. Re
duce
the u
nder
lying
risk f
actor
s
S
ustai
nable
ecos
ystem
s and
envir
onme
ntal
mana
geme
nt
DRR
stra
tegies
inter
grate
d with
clim
ate ch
ange
ad
aptat
ion
Foo
d sec
urity
for r
esilie
nce
D
RR in
tergr
ated i
nto he
alth s
ector
and s
afe ho
spita
ls
Pro
tectio
n of c
ritica
l pub
lic fa
cilitie
s
Reco
very
sche
mes a
nd so
cial s
afety
- nets
Vu
lnera
bility
redu
ction
with
dive
rsifie
d inc
ome o
ption
s
Finan
cial ri
sk-sh
aring
mec
hanis
ms
Publi
c - pr
ivate
partn
ersh
ip
Land
use p
lannin
g and
build
ing co
des
Ru
ral d
evelo
pmen
t plan
s and
DRR
3. Us
e kno
wled
ge, in
nova
tion
and e
duca
tion t
o buil
d a
cultu
re of
safet
y and
re
silien
ce at
all le
vels
2. Ide
ntify,
asse
ss an
d mo
nitor
disa
ster r
isks a
nd
enjan
ce ea
rly w
arnin
g.
1. En
sure
that
disas
ter ris
k re
ducti
on (D
RR) is
a na
tiona
l and
a loc
al pr
iority
wi
th a s
trong
insti
tution
al ba
sis fo
r imple
menta
tion
The i
ntegra
tion o
f disa
ster r
isk re
ducti
on in
tosu
staina
ble de
velop
ment
polic
ies an
d plan
ning
R
isk as
sess
emen
t and
map
s mult
i - r
isk: e
labor
ation
and
disse
mina
tion
In
diacto
rs on
DRR
and v
ulner
abilit
y
Data
& st
atisti
cal lo
ss in
forma
tion
E
arly
warn
ing: p
eople
cente
red;
infor
matio
n sys
tems;
publi
c poli
cy
Scie
ntific
and t
echn
ologic
al de
velop
ment;
data
shar
ing,
spac
ebas
ed ea
rth ob
serva
tion,
clima
te mo
delin
g and
fore
casti
ng;
ealrly
war
ning
R
egion
al an
d eme
rging
risks
DR
R ins
titutio
nal m
echa
nisms
(n
ation
al pla
tform
s);
DRR
part
of de
velop
ment
polic
ies an
d plan
ning,
secto
r wi
se an
d mult
isecto
r
Legis
lation
to su
ppor
t DRR
D
ecen
tralis
ation
of
resp
onsib
ilities
and r
esou
rces
A
sses
seme
nt of
huma
n re
sour
ces a
nd ca
pacit
ies
Fos
ter po
litica
l com
mitm
ent
C
ommu
nity p
artic
ipatio
n
In
forma
tion s
harin
g and
coop
erati
on;
N
etwor
ks ac
ross
disc
ipline
s and
re
gions
; dial
ogue
U
se of
stan
dard
DRR
term
inolog
y
Inclu
sion o
f DRR
into
scho
ol cu
rricu
la, fo
rmal
and i
nform
al ed
ucati
on
Train
ing an
d lea
rning
on D
RR:
comm
unity
leve
l, loc
al au
thoriti
es
targe
ted se
ctors;
equa
l acc
ess
R
esea
rch ca
pacit
y: mu
lti - r
isk; s
ocio
- eco
nomi
c; ap
plica
tion
P
ublic
awar
enes
and m
edia
Multi-
haza
rd ap
proa
ch
Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management
Disaster and Climate Risk Management Capacity Assessment | 71
top related