direct reactions in/for nuclear astrophysics
Post on 14-Jan-2016
61 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
1
Direct Reactions in/forDirect Reactions in/for Nuclear Astrophysics Nuclear Astrophysics
Carlos BertulaniCarlos Bertulani(University of Arizona)(University of Arizona)
2
Nuclear Astrophysics
TeV/nucleon keV/nucleon
??? ???Exotic stellar site
Quark matter in compact stars,Big Bang
Typical stellar site
Stellar evolution
Nuclear many-body problem: one of the hardest problems of all physics!• Interactions are complicated• Nucleons = composite particles• Requires large computation
Nuclear many-body problem: one of the hardest problems of all physics!• Interactions are complicated• Nucleons = composite particles• Requires large computation
3
Typical problems
BpBe 87 ),( γ BpBe 87 ),( γ
OC 1612 ),( γ OC 1612 ),( γ OC 1612 ),( γ OC 1612 ),( γ
4
Electron screening:Electron screening: (a)(a) in starsin stars (theoretical)(theoretical) (b) on earth(b) on earth (experimental+theoretical)(experimental+theoretical)
Atomic, QED, or nuclear effects?
NO
Stopping power tables wrong? YES
CB, Balantekin, Hussein, NPA 1997
CB, de Paula, PRC 2000, 2004
5
Solutions with direct reactions at 50-200 Solutions with direct reactions at 50-200 MeV/nucleonMeV/nucleon(A) Trojan horse
(B) ANC
Baur, PLB 1986
Akram Mukhamedzhanov, 1991
A(a=b+x,b+c)C A(x,c)C
Talk by Bob Tribble, Tuesday
(C) Knockout reactions CB, McVoy, PRC
1992Zdk
dZdk
dbest probe of ψ
Spectroscopic factorsSpectroscopic factors
CB, Hansen, PRC 2004
input for nuclear reactions in astrophysicsinput for nuclear reactions in astrophysics
Hansen, Tostevin, ARNPS 2003
Claudio Spitaleri, Catania
6
Shoemaker-Levy comet
)( ),(1
c b a
E
ddE
Edn
EddE
d
l
l
)(
),(1c b a
E
ddE
Edn
EddE
d
l
l
Theory
cba k
kbc
2
2
cba k
kbc
2
2
CB, Baur, Rebel, CB, Baur, Rebel, 19861986
Coulomb Coulomb dissociationdissociation
Kiener et al., Z. Phys. Kiener et al., Z. Phys. 19931993
(easier than this)
7
Standard Standard calculationscalculations
rMJJM
MJJM
00
00
;* rrr
1 – Use a 1 – Use a nuclear modelnuclear model. Expand trans. dens. into multipoles. Expand trans. dens. into multipoles
1a – e.g. a 1a – e.g. a potential modelpotential model (Woods Saxon + Coulomb + (Woods Saxon + Coulomb + spin orb.)spin orb.)
)()(2
10
2
1
ˆ
16
0
00
00000
*2
00000
00;
rRrRrI
j
J
J
jjjJMMJ
j
jJer
Jjl
JljE
C
lljJIeffMJJM
x
C
2 – Use an 2 – Use an optical potentialoptical potential, or build from folding (M3Y, JLM, , or build from folding (M3Y, JLM, etc.)etc.) sEtrdrdEU NNTP ,, 212
31
3 rrr
3 – Plug in 3 – Plug in DWBA amplitudeDWBA amplitude
RRR
YrRUrRrddm
f PTJMN ,
2)()*(33
2)(
8
4 – Repeat all for 4 – Repeat all for Coulomb interactionCoulomb interaction
00)( , MJYrJMESf x
JMC r
5 – Add all5 – Add all
M
JMN
JMC
x
ffJdEd
d J2
)()(
0 12
1
s,d
p3/2
s,dp,f
p3/2
E1E2
capturecapture break-break-upup
E1
9
Motobayashi et al, PRL 1994
Application to Application to 7Be(p,)8B
talk by Motobayashi
10
Discussions with John Bahcall, Discussions with John Bahcall, 19941994
11
page page 22
12
Nuclear Nuclear interaction:interaction:
BpBe 87 ),( γ BpBe 87 ),( γ
from
PbBPbB 78 ep PbBPbB 78 ep
50 MeV/nucleon
Data: Kikuchi, PLB 97 Calc: C.B., NPA 1998
13
Higher order Higher order transitionstransitions
dElmEEe
BEe
jtiE
jlm
tiE
j ,
,/
00/
00
dElmEEe
BEe
jtiE
jlm
tiE
j ,
,/
00/
00
Continuum Continuum discretizationdiscretization
14
Higher order transitions + E1-E2 Higher order transitions + E1-E2 interferenceinterference
PbBPbB 78 ep PbBPbB 78 ep
C.B., Z. Phys. 1996• small effect higher-
order transitions in
dEdd /• small E1-E2 interference in dEdd /
• but large E1-E2 interference in momentum distirbutions
Esbensen, Bertsch, NPA 1996
Used by Davids, PRL 1999 to filter E2 from S17(0)
15
0,22 rRUk
b
z
00 2 VEVU
z
ezS zik
,
,,,
bR
rbrR
SikS
EVU
zz
2
02
Relativistic Relativistic effectseffects
jlJM
zSedik
f
ezSzVzSiv
i
zkkiz
;
,2
,,,
'
0,
KKQ
bbQ
bbb
Q.b
jlJM
zSedik
f
ezSzVzSiv
i
zkkiz
;
,2
,,,
'
0,
KKQ
bbQ
bbb
Q.b
V0
Eikonal
Relativistic CDCC
CB, PRL 2005
16
0 2 4 6 8 10
[degrees]
0.010
0.100
E = 1.25 - 1 .5 M eV
E = 0.5 - 0.75 M eV
0.01
0.10
1.00
.d
/d
[b/r
ad]
relativistic corrections
DATA: Kikuchi et al, DATA: Kikuchi et al, 19971997
88B dissociation on lead at 50 B dissociation on lead at 50 MeV/nucleonMeV/nucleon
4-10% effect4-10% effect
0 0.5 1 1.5 2E [M eV]
0
40
80
120
160
d/d
E
[m
b/M
eV]
perturbation theory
R-CDCC
NR-CDCCwith non-relativistic V0
DATA: Davids et al, DATA: Davids et al, 20022002
17
Summary on CD method Summary on CD method forfor
BpBe 87 ),( γ BpBe 87 ),( γ
S17 (0) = 18 ± 1.1 eV.b S17 (0) = 18 ± 1.1 eV.b
CD method has proven useful to extract S17(0) (and other S-(and other S-factors)factors)
18
Attempts Attempts forfor
OC 1612 ),( γ OC 1612 ),( γ
Fleurot, PhD Thesis, 2002
PbCPbO 1216 PbCPbO 1216 80 MeV/nucleon
dotted:dotted: nuclearnuclear
dashed:dashed: CoulombCoulomb
solid:solid: nuclear + Coulomb + nuclear + Coulomb + interf.interf.
see also contribution by C. Angulo
19
)(ˆ)( ,)()()(
aaAaaAA rrrg
)()(~)( rOSrIrg llll
rrgr,rENr,rHdr all0''''
)(ˆ)'(ˆ' )()()()( rN
Hrr,r
N
H aaAaaA
Trying to reconcile structure and Trying to reconcile structure and reactionsreactionsWhat do we need?
What can we do in practice?
Hill-Wheeler, 1953
e.g. NCSM
What are the effective interactions in H = T + ½∑vik ??
MANY YEARS OF INVESTIGATION
talk by C. Forssen
20
r
rWCrR l
ljlj2/1,)(
r
rWCrR l
ljlj2/1,)(
Fix: correct Coulomb tail at large r’s
bad asymptoticsbad asymptoticsbad asymptoticsbad asymptotics
No-Core-Shell-ModelNo-Core-Shell-Model(with correction for asymptotics)
Navratil, C.B., Caurier, PLB 2005
PRC 2006
Many-body bound Many-body bound statestate
21
Knockout reactions with Knockout reactions with NCSMNCSM
m
ljmCC
innn
lj
C
strip
NCSM
C SerddzSbdl
SC
kd
d 2222
2
21
122
1rbb rk
m
ljmCC
innn
lj
C
strip
NCSM
C SerddzSbdl
SC
kd
d 2222
2
21
122
1rbb rk
With NCSM wavefunctions (10 ћ)
• l=1, j=1/2, I7Be=3/2: C2S=0.085
• l=1, j=3/2, I7Be=1/2: C2S=0.280
• l=1, j=3/2, I7Be=3/2: C2S=0.958
8B (41 MeV/nucleon) + 9Be 7Be + X 8B (41 MeV/nucleon) + 9Be 7Be + X
22
8B (938 MeV/nucleon) + 12C 7Be + X
σstr = 99.39 mb
exp = 94 ± 9 mb
8B (938 MeV/nucleon) + 12C 7Be + γ + X
σstr = 15.31 mb
exp = 12 ± 3 mb
DATA: Cortinal-Gil et al, 2002DATA: Cortinal-Gil et al, 2002
23
7Be(p,g)8B S-factor with NCSM
SS1717 = 22 ± 1 = 22 ± 1 eV.beV.b
24
Future: Charge Future: Charge ExchangeExchange
2AB
2AB
(p,n) (n,p) (d,2He) ... (Z, Z±1)
2200~ ABab
d
d
22
00~ ABabd
d
needed for A~50-60
based onTadeucci et al, NPA 1981
e- + (Z,A) (Z-1, A) + e
Z Z+1
Lenske, Wolter, Bohlen, PRL 1989CB, NPA 1993
Obtained from
Remco Zegers - MSU
25
Electron-ion collider ELISe Electron-ion collider ELISe (GSI)(GSI)
skins and halosskins and halos
soft multipole vibrationssoft multipole vibrations
σee’ (q)
GDR
SGDR11Li
H.Simon@gsi.de
Δrnp
26
2~ qf
ddE
dl
e
Ershov, PRC 2005
),,,( llnll raSqff very strong dependence on effective range expansion parameters, al, rl
CB, PLB 2005
Electron-ion collider ELISe Electron-ion collider ELISe (GSI)(GSI)
H.Simon@gsi.de
27
ikkra
kT ...
211
1~)(
20
ikkra
kT ...
211
1~)(
20
2/
1~)(
EiEEES
R 2/
1~)(
EiEEES
R
2//1
cot2
0
2
pra
Hmipc
C
2//1
cot2
0
2
pra
Hmipc
C
Kong, Ravndal, 2000
van Kolck, 1997Gegelia, 1998Kaplan, Savage, Wise, 1998
in progress
EE
R ''
EE
R ''
CB, Hammer, van Kolck, 2002
Reconciling Nuclear Physics with Reconciling Nuclear Physics with QCDQCD
Hen 4 Hen 4
28
Summary• Problems in nuclear astrophysics
• Screening: confusing
• too small cross sections
• Many reactions will never be measured directly
• Using direct reactions
• Coulomb excitation • Charge-exchange • Knockout & transfer reactions, …• Need ISOL and fragmentation facilities
• Needed theory
• reactions in general • bridge internal (structure) to external (reactions) • understand Nuc. Phys. from fundamental theory QCD
29
and for the LHC …
top related