differential sensitivity to extragalactic point sources

Post on 05-Jan-2016

35 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Differential Sensitivity to Extragalactic Point Sources. Richard White. University of Leeds. 01. Active Galactic Nuclei with the Jet oriented towards Earth. 90 deg. 60 deg. 30 deg. 0 deg. Blazars - Reminder. 02. Target Blazars. 03. z = 0.186. 0.165. 0.117. 0 o. 90 o. 0.071. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Richard White 01

Differential Sensitivity to Extragalactic Point Sources

Richard WhiteUniversity of Leeds

Richard White 02

Blazars - Reminder

Active Galactic Nuclei with the Jet oriented towards Earth.90 deg

60 deg

30 deg

0 deg

Richard White 03

Target Blazars

Richard White 04

Target Blazars

z = 0.186

0.165

0.1170.071 0o 90o

-90o ~42o lat

Richard White 05

Effective Area

Cos(Angle)

m2

Cos(0)Cos(-1)

Cos(1)

Neutrino Energy

(GeV)

Richard White 06

Effective Area

PKS2155-304, 50% ERes

Richard White 07

Angular Resolution

Assuming constant at the moment (1o – worst case).Using IceCube geometry doesn’t work well at all!

E (GeV)

Ang. R

es.

(deg)

Richard White 08

Atm. Background

Use Volkova Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 37, 784 (1980)

Function of Zenith angle

Calculate Daily Average.

Integrate over the search cone.

Rebinned to EResInside cone

Av. Source Zenith (over 2π)

Richard White 09

ν Production Total Solution: pp, pγ, and leptonic contributions.

Upper (very upper) limit, just pp.

Richard White 10

Measured γ-Ray spectrum.

Expected ν spectrum.

Kappes et al. (2006)

From γ-Rays to ν

Kelner et al. (2006)

Richard White 11

Measured γ-Ray spectrum.

Expected ν spectrum.

Intrinsic γ-Ray spectrum.

From γ-Rays to ν

Richard White 12

EBL

Richard White 13

Measured γ-Ray spectrum.

Expected ν spectrum.

Intrinsic γ-Ray spectrum.

From γ-Rays to ν

Richard White 14

Bringing it all together...

Input Eres, Emin, Emax

Input Aeff

Input Atm. Flux

Input ARes. Calc. El. vs. Time

Calc. fobs

Calc. E binsInput γ-Ray Spectrum

Apply EBL Model

Fit

Calc. Events >Ethres

Rebin to E bins

Rebin to E bins

Calc. ν Spectrum

Rebin to E bins

Calc. Source and Atm, ν in each E bin

Opt. Cone=1.585ARes

Integrate over Cone

Richard White 15

Cone Size

Richard White 16

ν Upper Limits

Ns = 29Nb = 33

Differential Flux PKS2155-304, z=0.117

Spectral Index = -2.0

Richard White 16

ν Upper Limits

Ns = 1.36Nb = 33

Differential Flux PKS2155-304, z=0.117

Primack(SAM,05)

Spectral Index = -2.8

Richard White 17

ν Upper Limits

Ns = 651 !!Nb = 29

Differential Flux 1ES1101-232, z=0.186

Spectral Index Forced to -1.1

Richard White 17

ν Upper Limits

Ns = 135Nb = 29

Differential Flux 1ES1101-232, z=0.186

Spectral Index Forced to -1.5

Richard White 17

ν Upper Limits

Ns = 26Nb = 29

Differential Flux 1ES1101-232, z=0.186

Spectral Index Forced to -2.0

Richard White 18

Conclusions

UPPER LIMITS obtained for several southern hemisphere blazars.

Must extend to p-γ

WORK IN PROGRESS

Even with the lowest EBL model the most distant Blazars upper limits exceed the background... but differential detection seems unlikely.

Results heavily depend on EBL... γ horizon expanding to limit the EBL with more distant sources.

top related