dental workforce trends—opportunities for improving access

Post on 11-Jan-2016

28 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Dental Workforce Trends—Opportunities for Improving Access. Shelly Gehshan, M.P.P. National Academy for State Health Policy March, 2008. What I’ll cover. Overall workforce trends State strategies in rural areas State action on workforce Progress on new workforce models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

1

Dental Workforce Trends—Opportunities for Improving

Access

Shelly Gehshan, M.P.P.National Academy for State Health

PolicyMarch, 2008

2

What I’ll cover

• Overall workforce trends

• State strategies in rural areas

• State action on workforce

• Progress on new workforce models

• Implementation Thoughts

• FYI--Lessons learned from Medical field

3

Is there a Shortage in the US? Active Dentists per 100,000 Population

54.5 54.5

53.3

52

50.7

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

4Source: American Dental Association, Survey Center. US Census Bureau (2001).

Is there a shortage? Active Dentists per 100,000 Population (2000)

5Source: Roger Rosenblatt, Holly Andrilla, Thomas Curtin, and Gary Hart. “Shortage of Medical Personnel at Community Health Centers,” Journal of the American Medical Association 295, No. 9 (2006): 1042-10491.

Dentist Vacancy Rates at Health Centers (2004)

6

Age Distribution of Private Practice Dentists (2005)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

<35 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+

Source: American Dental Association, 2005

7

Is There a Shortage of Hygienists?

• 158,000 hygienists in 2004

• Expected to grow (>27%) by 2014

• Hygienists leave profession

• ADHA says that, due to supervision requirements in many states, hygienists must locate where dentists are, so they are “maldistributed” as well

8

212

166161158149150152

145

226

0

50

100

150

200

250

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov

Number of Employed Dental Hygienists, in thousands

9

Dental Safety Net Needs Expanding

• No “dental emergency rooms”• Serves less than 10% of 82 million

underserved people (Bailit, JADA, 2003)

• Critical safety net consists of community health centers, hospitals, dental and hygiene schools, school-based health centers

10

State Strategies for Rural Areas

11

Supply, Redistribution Strategies

• State loan repayment programs for rural DDs and RDHs

• Licensing strategies – Foreign dentists in safety net settings– Licensure by credential– Licensure after service, residency

• Payment incentives (higher Medicaid fees in rural areas, clinics, e.g. Utah)

12

Ways to Increase the Supply...

• Exempt retired dentists from liability for volunteering to work in vans, CHCs, RHCs

• Establish rural clinical training sites or preceptorships for dental and hygiene students

• Work with rural schools and colleges to recruit dental and hygiene students

• Establish scholarships for rural dental students

13

More Ways to Increase the Supply...

• Help add dental capacity in clinics, CHCs

• Start a revolving loan fund for establishing rural practices

• Enhance sales of rural practices with grants for equipment upgrades

• Play “matchmaker” to help retiring rural dentists sell their practices

14

More Ways to Increase the Supply...

• Teledentistry via email or video saves trips

• Mobile dental vans – expensive, waste disposal problems– continuity of care and follow-up problems– hard to staff, but sometimes the only option

• Mobile dental units– rotate to locations like schools, nursing homes– easier to staff but smaller capacity

15

State Action on Workforce

16

Integrating Oral Health into Primary Care

• Dentist to population ratio shrinking; PCP to population ratio is growing

• Prevention is cheaper, better

• More frequent, earlier use of primary care services for young children and underserved

• Patient trust and comfort (fear factor)

17

Oral Health Services Medical Professionals Can Provide

• Oral health evaluation (visual screening for decay)

• Application of fluoride varnish

• Patient and parent education

• Dispensing oral health supplies– Toothbrushes, toothpaste, xylitol gum

• Limited prophylaxis, antimicrobials

• Case management, referral

18

State Action

• Curricula or training for primary care providers (AL, AR, CA, KY,ME, NH, NV, NY, OR, SD, WA, WI)

• Medicaid payment for MDs to provide fluoride varnish (13 states)*

• Joint initiatives for screening and referral (SC)

* Source: Survey of Medicaid/SCHIP Directors of Administration conducted by NASHP, 2008

19

Challenges in Integration

• Involve dentists in training MDs, RNs, NPs

• Link medical and dental homes

• Reimbursement through public and private insurance—make it universal

• Differences in fee-for-service and managed care

• Diffusion of idea; change practice patterns

20

Trends in dental hygiene

• Gradual loosening of supervision, expansions in scope

• Movement towards providing services in public health settings

• Bulk of hygienists still practice in traditional settings; maldistributed as are dentists

21

Supervision and Payment for Hygienists

• General supervision in 45 states in dental office or some settings

• Direct access to patients in some settings in 22 states (AZ, CA, CO, CT, IA, KS, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, NE, NH, NM, NV, NY, OK, OR, PA, RI,TX, WA)*

• Medicaid can reimburse hygienists directly in 12 states (CA, CO, CT, ME, MN, MO, MT, NM, NV, OR, WA, WI)**

* Source: American Dental Hygienists’ Association, “Direct Access States,” Available at www.adha.org** Source: American Dental Hygienists’ Association, “States Which Directly Reimburse Dental Hygienists for Services under the Medicaid Program,” Available at www.adha.org.

22

Current Workforce Proposals

• Proposals to expand scope or loosen supervision of hygienists**– 7 states have proposals far along or completed in the

legislative process (MA, WI, MN, MT, CA, OH, KS)• Proposals to develop new dental practitioners**

– 3 states have proposals far along in the legislative process (MN, MI, MA)

– 11 states are discussing proposals (CO, ME, NM, CA, FL, TX, OH, OR, KS, CT, PA)

**Survey of State Oral Health Coalition Leaders, NASHP 2008

23

Kansas Extended Care Permit (ECP) Hygienists

• RDH-ECP are hygienists in community settings (Head Start, schools, health depts, safety net clinics, and long-term care facilities)

• Hub and spoke system--general supervision• 55 hygienists have ECPs; 25 working in community settings.• In 2007, settings changed:

– ECP I hygienists can serve wider range of children– ECP II hygienists can serve a wider range of elders and

adults with special health care needs– Hygienists can apply fluoride varnish in community

settings

Source: Kansas Dental Hygienists’ Association, http://www.kdha.org/

24

California Registered Dental Hygienists in Alternative Practice (RDHAP)

• Work independently in underserved settings (HPSAs, FQHCs, schools, nursing homes, public health)

• 2 education programs in CA• Requirements: 150 CE units, BA or equivalent, 2,000

hours in last 36 months as licensed RDH• Licensure via standard testing process, plus referral

agreement with DDS required.• Need proof of dental visit and prescription for hygiene

services within 18 months of seeing a patient

Source: Beth Mertz, Presentation on “Meeting the Nation’s Oral Health Needs,” HRSA’s BHPs 2008 All Programs Meeting

25

The Business of RDHAP Practice

• Business plans--education program needed on how to do these• Developing payment structures and charting system—who will be charged

and for what?• Start up loans--mobile equipment runs $25K • Building the business

– Strategies vary by setting and community– Diversification helps mitigate risks– Outreach to consumers and health care systems

• Overcoming resistance• Building relationships

Source: Beth Mertz, “Advancing Oral Health of Underserved Populations through Innovative Oral Health Care Delivery Models: Registered Dental Hygienists in Alternative Practice, “ Presentation for Center for the Health Professions Seminar Series, 2008.

26

Structure of RDHAP Practice

• Laws/Regulations– Allow practice, but also limit it– Title 22/OBRA: vague construct creates confusion

• Care systems– RN, LTC homes, Schools, Clinics, etc.

• Payment systems– Denti-Cal, self pay, insurance companies

• Anti-competitive practices of dentists– Lawsuits, exclusion from institutions, slanderous marketing &

fear-mongering, betrayal of trust, exclusion of suppliers or dentists who collaborate

Source: Beth Mertz, “Advancing Oral Health of Underserved Populations through Innovative Oral Health Care Delivery Models: Registered Dental Hygienists in Alternative Practice, “ Presentation for Center for the Health Professions Seminar Series, 2008.

27

What isn’t Happening in States, but Needs to…

• Disease management approach for dental caries– Caries is infectious, recurs

• Change to primary care model in dentistry – Private practice model organized around

surgery, restorations, maximizing income– Primary dental care would involve screening,

risk assessment, case management, referrals

28

…And, Investment in Upstream Strategies

• Sealant programs serve too few kids– ME: programs reach about ½ the schools

(better than many states)

• Water fluoridation, in some areas it’s stalled or retreating, despite sound science, low cost

• Education and outreach for at-risk families

29

Progress on New Provider Models

30

Existing Models

• Dental therapist—New Zealand model– Called dental health aid therapist in AK; in use in 53

countries

• Oral health therapist—newer 3-yr program combines dental therapy and hygiene

• Expanded Function Dental Assistants– Underutilized; can expand productivity and profitability

of dental practices– For state licensing, scope info, check:

http://www.danb.org/main/statespecificinfo.asp

31

EFDAs are Underused

• Only 16 states train and license Expanded Function Dental Auxiliaries– EFDAs are dental extenders that make

practices more profitable

• Increase efficiency in large practices, clinics

• Most dentists not trained to use them– RWJ grant to PA may help other states

replicate training and practice models

32

Evidence on EFDAs

• Lotzkar et al, JADA. 82(1971): – Dental teams with 4 EFDAs and 1 dentist increase productivity over

base-line performance by 110% to 133% compared to 3 EFDAS and 1 dentist with productivity increase over base-line performance of 62% to 84%

• Abramowitz et al, JADA. 87(1973):– As more auxiliaries added to dental team, relative costs per unit of time

worked decreased from $2.54 to $2.26 and net income for the dentist increased from $28,030 to $39,147

• Lobene et al, The Forsyth Experiment: An Alternative System for Dental Care (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979): – Optimal setting of 1 dentist supervising 2 hygienist-assistant teams

provided calculated annual net of the gross income to practice of 35.3% and 47.0% by welfare and usual fees, compared to practice with 1 dentist and 1 team that had calculated expenses of 28.7% and 42.9% annual net of gross income to the practice

33

New Models for Dental Providers

• ADA model — Community Dental Health Coordinator (similar to Primary Dental Health Aides

in Alaska)

• ADHA model — Advanced Dental Hygiene Practitioner

• Pediatric Oral Health Therapist (a dental therapist specializing in kids)

34

Community Dental Health Coordinator

• Prevention: education, fluorides, sealants

• Treatment: gingival scaling, polishing

• Restoration: atraumatic restorative therapy

• Supervision: direct or indirect for services, general supervision for patient education

35

Advanced Dental Hygiene Practitioner

• Prevention: comprehensive services

• Treatment: manage periodontal care, prophylaxis, prescriptions

• Restoration: simple restorations, extractions

• Supervision: general supervision or unsupervised; in collaborative practice, or private dental offices

36

Dental therapists

• Prevention: fluoride treatments, sealants

• Treatment: x-rays, prophylaxis, gingival scaling

• Restoration: simple restorations, stainless steel crowns, extractions

• Supervision: general supervision under standing orders

37

ADHP DHAT CDHC

Masters level 2-year program 12-18 months

Licensure IHS certification (like licensure)

Certification

Curriculum draft on web

In 53 countries Planning

Seeking partners, $, legislation, pilot planned at 2 MN colleges

Proven model, many studies published. Pending legis. bars use in lower 48.

ADA has approved $2 M for 3 pilot projects; pilot ruled illegal in MI

38

ADHP DHAT CDHC

True midlevel provider (RDH + 2 yrs)

Function like midlevels, but educated in less time

Part dental assistant, part social worker (not a midlevel)

Post-RDH career track

High school grads

High school grads

Could be supported by reimbursable services

Could be supported by reimbursable services

Supported by grants? Few reimbursable services

39

ADHP DHAT CDHC

Pool of RDHs ready to train

Recruited from underserved areas, groups

Not clear, dental assistants?

Risk assessment, case management

Basic preventive and restorative services

Prevention, education, case-finding for dentists

Useful to expand safety net

Useful to expand safety net

Useful for prevention, limited use in safety net

40

Procedures EFDA CDHC (proposed)

DHAT ADHP (proposed)

Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART)

X X

Placement of temporary restorations X X X X

Simple restorations X X X

Light cure composites X

Simple extractions X X

Lab processed crowns X X

Pulpotomy X X

Pulp capping X X

Restorative Capacity of Providers

Source: NASHP, “Clinical Capacity of Current and Proposed Providers,” Table developed by NASHP, February 2008

41

Cost Effectiveness of Dental Therapists in Canada

• Dental therapists reduced the number of medical evacuations

• Transportation costs dropped dramatically• Dental therapists can deal with most emergencies• Dental therapists make dentists’ visits more productive,

triage patients, take x-rays, arrange for medications before dentist arrives*

• Quality of care studies determined that the procedures performed by dental therapists are of equal or greater quality than those performed by dentists

* Source: Dr. Todd Hartsfield, former director of Saskatchewan Health Center

42

Evidence of Dental Therapists’ Quality of Care

• P.E. Hammons, H.C. Jamison, L.L. Wilson. “Quality of service provided by dental therapists in an experimental program at the University of Alabama.” Journal of the American Dental Association. 82 (1971):1060-1066

• L.J. Brearley, FN Rosenblum. “Two-year evaluation of auxiliaries trained in expanded duties.” Journal of the American Dental Association. 84 (1972): 600-610.

• E.R. Abrose, A.B. Hord, W.J. Simpson, A Quality Evaluation of Specific Dental Services Provided by the Saskatchewan Dental Plan. (Regina, Canada: Province of Saskatchewan Department of Health, 1976).

• Gordon Trueblood, A Quality Evaluation of Specific Dental Services Provided by Canadian Dental Therapists (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Epidemiology and Community Health Specialties, Health and Welfare Canada, 1992).

43

Newtok Clinic, Yukon-Kuskokwim

44

AFHCAN CartAlaska Federal Health Care Access Network

• Wireless Networking• Touchscreen• ECG / Video Dental Camera

and Otoscope / Scanner / Digital Camera

• Mobile – Customized• Patient safe

• WWW. AFHCAN.ORG

45

46

How do We Move Forward on New Workforce Models?

47

3 Requirements for Policy Change

1. Shared perception of the problem– Public agreement; communication frames

issue, raises priority

2. Political support– Broad-based support, all powerful groups or

actors involved

3. Viable policy solution– Workable, timely, affordable, proven

48

Problems lead to Solutions

• Parents not getting kids to the dentist

• Areas lack fluoridated water, sealant programs

• Too few dentists locate near, serve low income patients

Provide education to parents, incentives, fines

Fluoridate water, fund sealant programs, school based care

Recruit dentists, pay more to treat low income patients, fix hassles

49

Consider Attitudes in Building Support for Solutions

Provide education to parents, incentives, fines

Fluoridate water, fund sealants, school-based services

Recruit dentists to underserved areas, pay more, fix hassles

Low income parents are irresponsible; No incentives!

Some oppose fluoride, more services to the poor (equity issues)

Dentists are rich already, won’t come, don’t care

50

Attitudes about Dentists

• “They feel no obligation to the community.”• “Uncooperative, greedy, lacking in

empathy.”• “The most territorial mammals on the face

of the earth, except maybe dogs.”• “Don’t want to care for poor people but

they don’t want us to either.”

Source: S. Gehshan, T. Straw, “Access to Oral Health Services for Low Income People,” National Conference of State Legislatures, 2002.

51

Organized Dentistry Does Care

• “voluntary programs to deliver free care…are no substitute for fixing the Medicaid program.”

• “We need to get more private dentists participating in Medicaid.” (Roth, 3/27/07)

• Active on many issues (SCHIP dental, fluoridation, Title VII, dental issues in IHS, CMS, HRSA programs)

52

Important Steps

• State and local policy communities come to consensus, not national groups

• Focus on the underserved, not providers

• Communicate solutions, don’t assume people understand

• Seek investments from foundations, governments

53

Important Partners

• Payors—Medicaid, SCHIP, private insurers, business

• Coalitions—Provider associations, dental/ medical leaders

• Legislators, local and state agency leaders

• Universities, training programs

• Safety net clinics, rural providers

• Foundations

54

Ideas for groundwork

• Estimate impact of new providers on private dental practice, safety net clinics

• Develop financing options to support them, dentist supervisors, and facilities where they practice

• Target new providers to specific settings

• Data collection to monitor supply, demand

• Establish multi-state collaboratives

55

Legal and Regulatory Groundwork

• Establish manpower pilot authority (CA)

• Consider new regulatory structure for auxiliaries (WA, NM, IA, CT)

• Examine ban on corporate practice of dentistry—restricts choices for dentists, and options for communities

• Examine dental practice act—may need safety net exemption

56

Why Dentists Oppose Midlevels

• Would create a two-tier system of care

• There’s no shortage of dentists

• It’s illegal for non-dentists to do dentistry

• They would jeopardize patient safety

• Inefficient if they practice independently

• They would take patients away from private dentists

57

Answering Those Concerns

• We have 3 tiers now (private, public, none)

• Documented shortages in many areas

• States regulate all health professionals, including dentists, to protect public safety

• Efficient business models can be developed

• Private dentists don’t treat 1/3 of the public; won’t lose business

58

What dentists see…

59

Dental Economics

• About 55% from insurance, 45% cash• Very sensitive to downturns in the

economy; experience with oversupply• Overhead averages about $.60-$.65 of

each dollar earned• Dentists have more to gain than lose

from new providers• About 45% of patient visits are for hygiene

services

60Source: Albert Guay, “Dental Practice: Prices, Production, and Profit,” JADA, Vol. 136 (March 2005), 359.

61

Concurrent Steps to Create New Providers

• Curriculum development, faculty training, recruiting students

• Accreditation• Legislation establishing new providers;

issue enabling regulations• Licensing or credentialing process

62

System Questions

• How to limit opposition and ensure new providers improve access?– License them only in dental HPSAs?– License in safety net settings only?– Enlist physicians, hospitals

• How to involve and benefit dentists?– Develop referral networks, placement sites– Legal responsibility, and payment, for

supervising, collaborating with, new providers

63

Lessons Learned from theMedical Field

64

Nurse Practitioners

• Models created by leaders in 1960s (Commonwealth $)

• Nurses opposed them (too medical)

• Studies done on quality, cost effectiveness

• Needed professional home: educational program, faculty leaders (RWJ $)

65

Nurse Practitioner Workforce Growth

Source: Unpublished data from the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties; Analysis by the Center for Health Professions, UCSF, 2004.

66

Demonstration programs were mostly rural (RWJ $)

• UC Davis, rural physicians in home towns were clinical preceptors

• Utah Valley Hospital, rural clinics, back-up by ER docs

• Tuskegee Institute, mobile vans, fax/ phone to supervising physicians

• Frontier Nursing Service, KY, rural maternity care, physician back-up

67

Physician Assistants

• Leader at Duke envisioned PAs as primary care providers, from roots in military medical corps

• National assoc. and accrediting body est’d early on (RWJ $)

• Developed separately from NPs

• Less controversial, yet similar to NPs

68

Growth of Physician Assistants 1980-2020

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics and American Academy of Physician Assistants; Analysis by The Robert Graham Center, 2004.

69

Elements for Progress

• Demonstrated need

• Workable solutions

• Broad support

• Leadership—rural states led the way in developing nurse practitioners, physician assistants

70

71

Shelly GehshanSenior Program Director

National Academy for State Health Policysgehshan@nashp.org

202-903-0101

top related