date: wednesday, september 25, 2013 4:57:18 pm carol forman to: msfc-ssfl-eis subject: re: comment...
Post on 31-Aug-2018
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
From: Carol FormanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:57:18 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Carol Forman
mailto:atlantis3@comcast.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)To: bonnie KleaCc: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: RE: NASA Announces Availability of Draft EIS for Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL)Date: Friday, August 02, 2013 3:48:15 PM
Hi, Bonnie,The procedure (in the Notice of Availability) asks you to make this request to:Allen Elliott, SSFL Project Director, by phone at (256) 544-0662 or by email at msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov.So by this email I am doing it for you. I no longer have your home address. Could you please provide it to msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov? Thank you. Merrilee
From: bonnie Klea [mailto:bonnie1@dslextreme.com] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 1:34 PMTo: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)Subject: Re: NASA Announces Availability of Draft EIS for Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) Merrilee, Could I reserve a hard copy of the DEIS, if you have one. I plan to attend theCorp. Pointe meetings.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000) wrote: NASA has announced, in the Federal Register, the Notice of Availability of a DraftEnvironmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The DEIS evaluates potentialenvironmental impacts of proposed demolition and environmental cleanup activities ofproperty administered by NASA at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) inCalifornia. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires analysis of potential impactsof certain actions undertaken by a federal agency. NASA is preparing to implementsoil and groundwater cleanup required under agreements executed with the CaliforniaDepartment of Toxic Substances. NASA also is preparing the land for disposition, orexcess, which is through the Department of General Services. NASAs preparationincludes consideration of the potential demolition of all structures on SSFL. The DEIS is intended to inform NASA decision-makers, regulating agencies, and thepublic of the potential environmental consequences of the proposed demolition ofbuildings and structures and the proposed environmental cleanup actions forgroundwater and soil at the NASA-administered portion of the SSFL. The DEISconsiders a range of remedial technologies that might be implemented to achieve theproposed groundwater and soil remediation goals. NASA will use the DEIS toconsider the potential environmental, economic, and social impacts of the proposed
mailto:/O=NASA/OU=JSC/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=777778515mailto:bonnie1@dslextreme.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:mfellows@nasa.gov
-
remediation action. This announcement initiates a public comment period that closes on September 16,2013. Two public meetings will be held to receive comments on the DEIS, on August27, 2013, from 2:00-4:00 p.m., and on August 28, 2013, from 6:00-8:00 p.m., bothmeetings at Corporate Pointe in the Auditorium at 8413 Fallbrook Avenue, West Hills,Calif. 91304. To review the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register, visit:https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-18700 To review the Draft EIS, visit:http://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/news/SSFL.html. To learn more about NASAs cleanup at SSFL, visit:http://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov.
https://federalregister.gov/a/2013-18700http://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/news/SSFL.htmlhttp://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov/
-
From: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)To: Adam Slee; MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: RE: Draft Environmental Impact CommentDate: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:05:25 PM
Adam,Thankyouforyourcomments.TobecomeofficialcommentsforconsiderationintheDEISprocess,ifelectronicallysubmitted(ashere),theyneedtobesubmittedtotheemailnotedabove:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov.Ihavedonethatforyouwiththisemail.IfyouoryourcolleagueshaveadditionalcommentsonorbeforeOct.1,pleasesubmitthemtothatemailaddress.MerrileeFellows
From: Adam Slee [mailto:adam.slee030@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:00 AMTo: Fellows, Merrilee (HQ-LD000)Cc: adam.slee030@gmail.comSubject: Draft Environmental Impact CommentTheattachedisacommentforyourconsideration.Iamawareoftheframeworkrequirementsregardingremovalofallhazardouswastesbutconsidercontainmentshouldatleastbeconsideredasavalidalternative.Containmentwillbelessenvironmentallyharmfulandalotcheapertoexecute.KindregardsAdamSlee
mailto:/O=NASA/OU=JSC/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=777778515mailto:adam.slee030@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.govmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Cynthia WrightTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:41:12 AM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Cynthia Wright
mailto:virginbirthprod@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: CHRISTINE STEWARTTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EIS- Clean up the mess!Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 6:54:04 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
CHRISTINE STEWART
mailto:atticuss@pacbell.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Darren SkotnesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:21 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Darren Skotnes
mailto:dskotnes18@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Jim PetkiewiczTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:35 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Jim Petkiewicz
mailto:peckos@me.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: John OzedTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:38 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
John Ozed
mailto:johnozed@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Lauren MurdockTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:52 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Lauren Murdock
mailto:murdock_ls@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: RICARDO BARBA OCHOATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:51:52 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
RICARDO BARBA OCHOA
mailto:rik_e8780@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Veronica HayesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:01 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Veronica Hayes
mailto:veronicalhayes@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: R GordonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:02 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
R Gordon
mailto:rgordon14@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: JACK PAPAZIANTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:03 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
JACK PAPAZIAN
mailto:jackbail@sbcglobal.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: k hipkinsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:09 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
k hipkins
mailto:klhipkins@msn.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Ross HeckmannTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:15 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Ross Heckmann
mailto:RossS.Heckmann@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: ANGELA BARKERTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:18 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
ANGELA BARKER
mailto:angelambarker@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Danton KonoTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:19 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Danton Kono
mailto:dkono@chw.edumailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Dallas DekeyrelTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:21 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Dallas Dekeyrel
mailto:dallasdekeyrel@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Margaret T.M. PetkiewiczTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:30 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Margaret T.M. Petkiewicz
mailto:margarita.p830@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Isabelle Ferte ArmourTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:35 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Isabelle Ferte Armour
mailto:zazaarmour@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: kerry drakeTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:44 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
kerry drake
mailto:kerrydrake@cox.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Michael SwansonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:49 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Michael Swanson
mailto:swanson71258@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Daniel GellerTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:52:53 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Daniel Geller
mailto:dgel@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: DARLENE NORWOODTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:09 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
DARLENE NORWOOD
mailto:darlenenorwood@mac.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: LAWRENCE ROSENBERGTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:23 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
LAWRENCE ROSENBERG
mailto:larryrosenberg@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: ADRIAN DENATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:24 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
ADRIAN DENA
mailto:adro_la@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: ARTURO DIAZTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:29 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
ARTURO DIAZ
mailto:atdiaz@sbcglobal.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Will MooreTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:53:40 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Will Moore
mailto:sk292009@aol.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Steven CollinsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:09 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Steven Collins
mailto:sc89@jhu.edumailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Dolores J. ArondTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:19 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Dolores J. Arond
mailto:djarond@verizon.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Deb ChristensenTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:26 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Deb Christensen
mailto:jenizakc@sbcglobal.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: jennifer lopezTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:31 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
jennifer lopez
mailto:jenkiki78@Yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Robert RosenbergTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:31 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Robert Rosenberg
mailto:endobob@earthlink.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: seth carrTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:34 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
seth carr
mailto:scarr77@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Caryn GravesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:40 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Caryn Graves
mailto:caryn@lmi.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: KRISTOFFER POLAHATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:42 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
KRISTOFFER POLAHA
mailto:kristofferpolaha@mac.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Juli LoupeTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:54:57 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Juli Loupe
mailto:julimalibu@aol.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: MARYANNE JACKSONTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:03 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
MARYANNE JACKSON
mailto:westcoastproperties@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Brian BensonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:10 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Brian Benson
mailto:bk_benson@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: John TeevanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:15 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
John Teevan
mailto:jptrugger@cox.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Patty GroganTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:23 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Patty Grogan
mailto:pattygrogan@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Michael ElkinsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:33 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Michael Elkins
mailto:mikensd@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Corey LaneTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:35 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Corey Lane
mailto:cori@loanleaders.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: LUIS CAMARENATo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:37 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
LUIS CAMARENA
mailto:ldcamarena@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Todd SnyderTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:39 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Todd Snyder
mailto:todd.clark.snyder@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: MOSES CARLTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:39 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
MOSES CARL
mailto:moses.carl@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: MICHAEL TOCZEKTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:54 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
MICHAEL TOCZEK
mailto:michaeltoczek@att.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Stepheny McGrawTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:55:58 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Stepheny McGraw
mailto:stepheny@earthlink.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Naomi SoboTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:22 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Naomi Sobo
mailto:gramnome@cox.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Lawrence BaldwinTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:23 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Lawrence Baldwin
mailto:lhbaldwin@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: WILLIAM HOOPERTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:24 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
WILLIAM HOOPER
mailto:billhooper77@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: George BehrmanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:24 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
George Behrman
mailto:george@auc.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Gerald StratmanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:38 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Gerald Stratman
mailto:zonker8012@comcast.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Brandyn GibsonTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:40 PM
I could care less about what the rest of this says, but treat the environment of earth as you would analien planet. Preserve!
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Brandyn Gibson
mailto:gibson3412@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: nancy blastosTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:49 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
nancy blastos
mailto:nab1180@verizon.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: nancy blastosTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:49 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
nancy blastos
mailto:nab1180@verizon.netmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: larry bairdTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:49 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
larry baird
mailto:larrycbaird@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Mike JonesTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:57 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Mike Jones
mailto:mike.d.jones@umusic.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Adam LaneTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:56:59 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Adam Lane
mailto:enalmada@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Clayton Barbeau, M.A., MFTTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:57:00 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
Clayton Barbeau, M.A., MFT
mailto:barbeau@aol.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: PAblo MedinaTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Re: Comment on SSFL Draft EISDate: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:57:14 PM
Over decades, NASA contaminated the Santa Susana Field Lab with dioxins, PCBs, perchlorate, heavymetals, TCE and other volatile organic compounds. Hundreds of thousands of people live nearby. Afederal study showed that people living closer to the site have higher rates of thyroid, bladder, bloodand lymph cancers than people living further away.
In 2010, NASA signed a legally binding agreement with California to clean up all contamination thatcould be detected. But Boeing, NASA's contractor at the site and owner of most of the site, has beenpushing to block full cleanup of most of the site. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement recentlyreleased by NASA that barely mentions the contamination raises questions about whether NASA is tryingto break out of the cleanup agreement it signed.
It is critical that NASA live up to the commitments it made in the 2010 cleanup agreement. I stronglyurge NASA to meet its responsibilities regarding the toxic contamination it created. Do what youpromised to do--fully clean up the site.
PAblo Medina
mailto:tetuserectus@yahoo.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Roy TuckmanTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Friday, September 27, 2013 5:17:12 AM
Dear Mr. Elliott,
Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.
NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.
NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.
NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.
Sincerely,
Roy Tuckman
mailto:rtuckman@kpfk.orgmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Brendan DwyerTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:23:56 PM
Dear Mr. Elliott,
Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.
NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.
NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.
NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.
Sincerely,
Brendan Dwyer
mailto:bdwyer81@gmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Horace GaimsTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:26:23 PM
Dear Mr. Elliott,
Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.
NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.
NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.
NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.
Sincerely,
Horace Gaims
mailto:HGAIMS@AOL.COMmailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: William BoddenTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:29:19 PM
Dear Mr. Elliott,
Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.
NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.
NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.
NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.
Sincerely,
William Bodden
mailto:bbodden@bendcable.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Teri HittTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:31:18 PM
Dear Mr. Elliott,
Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.
NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.
NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.
NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.
Sincerely,
Teri Hitt
mailto:info@terihitt.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: janet makerTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:31:22 PM
Dear Mr. Elliott,
Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.
NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.
NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.
NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement. Now it is time to,without further delay, implement this historic cleanup agreement, thoroughly and completely.
Sincerely,
janet maker
mailto:jamaker2001@hotmail.commailto:msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov
-
From: Robert HeronTo: MSFC-SSFL-EISSubject: Santa Susana Cleanup Draft EISDate: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:31:33 PM
Dear Mr. Elliott,
Im writing to applaud NASA for having entered into a binding agreement with the State of California in2010 to clean up all detectible contamination at the polluted Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). Inresponse to NASA's Draft Environmental Report on the SSFL cleanup, I now urge NASA to now fully andrigorously carry out the commitments made in that cleanup agreement.
NASAs portion of SSFL is contaminated with toxic chemicals including PCBs, perchlorate, dioxins, heavymetals, and various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, all of which can produce harmfulhealth effects. These materials can cause solid cancers and leukemias as well as developmental,genetic, neurological and immune system disorders.
NASAs contamination at SSFL has the potential to impact communities near the site and beyond.Indeed, pollutants from the site have already migrated offsite. The best way to ensure that public healthis protected is to clean up to background as NASA has agreed to do.
NASA should be commended for having entered into the 2010 cleanup agreement
top related