daryl williams, melbourne health: achieving national elective surgery target in victoria
Post on 18-Nov-2014
815 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Achieving national elective surgery targets
(NEST) in Victoria
Professor Daryl Williams
Divisional director surgery, perioperative, trauma & surgical oncology,
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Talk overview
• NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
National Elective Surgery Target
NEST is divided into two complementary strategies:
Part 1: Stepped improvement in the number of patients treated within the clinically recommended time.
Part 2: A progressive reduction in the number of patients who are overdue for surgery beyond the clinically recommended time.
*Na$onal Partnership Agreement (NPA) on Improving Public Hospital Services, pg 14 -‐ 26 hCp://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/npa-‐improvingpublichospitals-‐agreement
NEST Part 1
Time Cat 1 Target Cat 2 Target Cat 3 Target
Baseline 92.3% 86.6% 89.4%
By Dec 2012 96% 90% 92%
By Dec 2013 100% 93% 95%
By Dec 2014 100% 97% 97%
By Dec 2015 100% 100% 100%
By 2015 100% of patients waiting for elective surgery will be treated within their clinical recommended time.
NEST Part 2
Cat 31 Dec 10 (Baseline)
31 Dec 12 (Target)
31 Dec 13 (Target)
31 Dec 14 (Target)
31 Dec 15 (Target)
1 0 days 0 days 0 days 0 days 0 days
2 39 days 29 days 20 days 10 days 0 days
3 130 days 98 days 65 days 33 days 0 days
By 2015 the average overdue wait time will be zero days
Total numbers of additions & removals from ES waitlist
Median wait time to surgery in public hospitals 2010-11
Variation in clinical urgency categorisation 2010/11
Australian data for hip replacement
Australian admission data
Current categories for elective surgery
Source: The Australian Ins$tute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2008) Na$onal Health Data Dic$onary no. 14,
Na#onal Benchmarks. Urgency with which the pa$ent requires elec$ve hospital care/surgery
Surgical Category DescripBon of recommended Bmeframes Category 1 admission within 30 days desirable for a condi$on that has the poten$al to deteriorate
quickly to the point that it may become an emergency Category 2 admission within 90 days desirable for a condi$on causing some pain, dysfunc$on or
disability but which is not likely to deteriorate quickly or become an emergency
Category 3 admission at some $me in the future acceptable for a condi$on causing minimal or no
pain, dysfunc$on or disability, which is unlikely to deteriorate quickly and which does not have the poten$al to become an emergency.
National definitions for categorisation
National Categorisation Overarching principle
Patients who require an elective procedure are assigned an urgency category by the treating clinician Appropriate to patient and their clinical condition Not influenced by availability of hospital/doctors
Multifaceted approach to meet targets
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Referral Management
Electronic Standardised Appropriate for public hospitals Acceptance based on the capacity to treat in
a timely fashion
Waitlists
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Optimising Health
General preventative strategies
Targeted initiatives
Improved cardiorespiratory capacity
TKR and Pre-habilitation
• Pre-operative muscle exercise program may improve outcome – resistance training, flexibility, step
training – 3x week, 8 weeks – improved strength, functional
outcomes at 1 and 3 months » Swank A. J Strength Cond Res 2011;
25: 318
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Emergency Surgery trends Victoria
Surgical caseload 2008-2011
Who does emergency surgery?
Elective – emergency mix
Outcomes of EGS model Direct clinical effects
Decreased night time operating Reduced length of stay Decreased complication rates Lower return to theatre rates
Staff Improved satisfaction of surgeons Improved training of registrars
Electives Lower elective surgery cancellation rates Maintenance of elective surgery numbers
Cost neutral
RMH demand profile
70% can wait longer than 8 hours
Emergency surgery demand & supply
Timeliness of Emergency Surgery
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Queues
Treat in turn
Scheduling using Patient Flow Portals
Variation
Variation
Variation
Variation
Care Bundles and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
Care bundles are groupings of practice processes that individually improve care, but when applied together result in a substantially greater improvement.
Colorectal ERAS
Orthopaedic Joint ERAS
Malviya A. Acta Orthopedica 2011; 82: 577
ERAS outcomes Lowered LOS Less complications ?Decreased Mortality
4500 consecutive joint replacements
reduced 90 day mortality: 0.8% to 0.2%
reduced LOS: mean 6 to 3 days less transfusion: 23% to 10% less complications
Malviya A. Acta Orthopedica 2011; 82: 577
Checklists
A simple memory aid to ensure processes of care are completed
Example safe surgery saves lives
Safe Surgery Checklist • 3 principles: "
Simplicity " Wide applicability " Measurability "
Process " literature review" consensus among experts" wide consultation" piloting and evaluation"
Results: Death & Complications
Change in Complications
Change in Death
High Income 10.3% -> 7.1%* 0.9% -> 0.6%
Low and Middle Income
11.7% -> 6.8%* 2.1% -> 1.0%*
* p<0.05 Haynes et al. A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population. New England Journal of Medicine
360:491-9. (2009)
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Perioperative patient flows • Patient Streams
– Day case versus multiday – Hubs of specialisation – Flexible environments
• Stratification systems – Suitability for pathways – Perioperative Risk Stratification
• Efficiency Benchmarking – Real time tracking
On the day
Start Time Matrix
3 key constraints – theatres, PACU, beds
Transparency of processes and flow Real time tracking of patients with automated alerts ERAS, standardised pathways and bundles
Start time matrix
Start time matrix
Electronic Patient Calling Systems
Wireless Patient Tracking
Electronic records & decision support
Traffic light filtering systems
Parallel Processing
PACU block
Theatre View
Dashboards
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Discharge Strategies
Rigorous discharge planning
Patient Flow Management Tool
Criterion based, nurse initiated discharge
Talk overview • NEST targets and categorisation • Referral, waitlists • Optimisation of patients • Streaming and elective/emergency mix • Models of care • Scheduling and queuing theory • Optimal theatre efficiency • Discharge planning • Future trends
Balancing public and private
Public
Swingers
Private
Private insurance hospital cover percentages June 1999: 30.6%
Introduction of 30% private health insurance rebate June 2011: 45.3%
Australian elective & emergency surgeries in public and private
4.1% per annum increase in private elective surgery
A decreasing queue discourages private insurance
If waiting times are diminished in public then private rates may decrease Private
Swingers
Public
Victorian patients waiting >365 days for surgery
Thank you
top related