cosmological constraints on20100220-kek... · cosmological constraints on r-parity violating susy...
Post on 20-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Cosmological Constraints on
R-Parity violating SUSY
under Lepton Flavor Violation
岩本 祥 [Sho Iwamoto]
2010/02/20
KEK-PH 2010 @ KEK/筑波 [Tsukuba]
along the paper
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi and SI.
Cosmological Constraints on R-parity violation.
arXiv: 0912.0585 [hep-ph] (2009).
The University of Tokyo
Outline
1. R-Parity violating SUSY
2. Cosmological Constraints
3. Our Results
4. Application for LHC
<2>
along the paper
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi and SI.
Cosmological Constraints on R-parity violation.
arXiv: 0912.0585 [hep-ph] (2009).
(about to be published)
JUMP
JUMP
JUMP
JUMP
<3>
1. R-parity violating SUSY
“To avoid the Proton Decay in the MSSM,
we usually impose the R-parity.
But actually, we have other two choices. ”
INDEX
MSSM and R-parity
MSSM
Hierarchy problem → solved!
Proton decay problem
<4>
(Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model)
Why does Proton decay?
Superpotential of the MSSM
Both and Proton Decay
Proton Decay Problem
<5>
R-parity
Superpotential of the MSSM
<6>
( s: spin )
with R-Parity conservation
Both and Proton Decayis stable.
SUSY without R-parity
However, since proton decay needs both and ,
we have other two possibilities!
To forbid with Baryon-parity etc.
To forbid with Lepton-parity etc.
with assuming
<7>
(Allowing )
(Allowing )
SUSY without R-parity
That is, we can install RpV interactions additionally.
MSSM with R-parity →
-MSSM →
-MSSM →
<8>
MSSM without R-parity
Introductive Diagram
<9>
Standard Model
Supersymmetry
MSSM
Dark Matter!!
R-parity
conservation
MSSM with R-parity
-MSSM
-MSSM
B-conservation
MSSM without R-parity
L-conservation
(Here we need other DM candidates.)
What I studied
Can we constraint such exotic couplings?
<10>
Collider experiments → various constraints
of order .
We analyzed cosmological constraints
→ much more stringent!(as we will see later…)
YES!!
<11>
2. Cosmological Constraints
“The violation of R-parity may spoil
the current Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe.”
INDEX
Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe
Current universe:
<12>
There’s Baryon,and no anti-baryon.
Baryon
Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe
Note:
Today we assume that
Current Baryon Asym. is generated
before EWPT.
<13>
Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe
Current universe:
<14>
There’s Baryon,and no anti-baryon.
Baryon
Wash-out with B-viol.
However, if we have interaction,
in the early universe.
And if frequently enough,
→ achieve Equilibrium :
→ No Baryon Asymmetry!
→ must be small enough!
<15>
“WASH-OUT”
Wash-out with B-viol.
That is, if
<16>
LARGE , then
“WASH-OUT” occurs!!
Bouquet and Salati, 1987
But this is a bit naïve view…
We have to consider “sphaleron.”
Sphaleron
In the early universe (temperature )
→ the sphaleron process is frequent. (by thermal effects)
Sphaleron converts
Baryon Anti-lepton
→ Equilibrium.
<17>
Kuzmin, Rubakov, Shaposhnikov, 1985; Ringwald, 1988
Manton, 1983; Klinkhamer and Manton, 1984; ’t Hooft, 1976
Sphaleron’s Effect
If Baryon is short…
sphaleron works right to left
<18>
sphaleron
(anti-lepton)
(baryon)
Sphaleron’s Effect
If Baryon is short…
sphaleron works right to left
<19>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
and achieve Equilibrium.
Sphaleron’s Effect
Also when (anti-)Lepton is short,
sphaleron does left to right
<20>
sphaleron
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Sphaleron’s Effect
Also when (anti-)Lepton is short,
sphaleron does left to right
<21>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
and achieve Equilibrium.
Wash-out with B-viol.
Thus, actually the previous wash-out by
is…
<22>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Wash-out with B-viol.
Thus, actually the previous wash-out by
is…
<23>
sphaleron
(anti-lepton)
(baryon)
Wash-out with B-viol.
Thus, actually the previous wash-out by
is…
<24>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
“WASH-OUT”
Wash-out with L-viol.
This story
does not end here!
<25>
Kuzmin, Rubakov and Shaposhnikov, 1985Campbell, Davidson, Ellis and Olive, 1992
Wash-out with L-viol.
If
large (in the sphaleron era),
<26>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Wash-out with L-viol.
If
large (in the sphaleron era),
<27>
sphaleron
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Wash-out with L-viol.
If
large (in the sphaleron era),
<28>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Wash-out occurs!!
Wash-out with L-viol.
But
NOTE ONE IMPORTANT POINT!
<29>
Campbell, Davidson, et al., 1992; Dreiner and Ross, 1983
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Wash-out with L-viol.
Imagine this case.
<30>
Campbell, Davidson, et al., 1992; Dreiner and Ross, 1983
If the Lepton Flavor is NOT violated,
and
if at least one of is conserved,
Wash-out with L-viol.
<31>
Campbell, Davidson, et al., 1992; Dreiner and Ross, 1983
Wash-out with L-viol.
<32>
sphaleron
Campbell, Davidson, et al., 1992; Dreiner and Ross, 1983
Wash-out with L-viol.
<33>
Campbell, Davidson, et al., 1992; Dreiner and Ross, 1983
Wash-out with L-viol.
<34>
sphaleron
Campbell, Davidson, et al., 1992; Dreiner and Ross, 1983
Wash-out with L-viol.
<35>
Baryon SURVIVES!!!
Campbell, Davidson, et al., 1992; Dreiner and Ross, 1983
Wash-out with L-viol.
<36>
Baryon Survives.Wash-out!
The “leptonic” wash-out needs three sif there’s no LFV.
Wash-out with L-viol.
But remember!
In MSSM,
We have LFVs in general!!!
The Standard Model The MSSM
<37>
Endo, Hamaguchi, and SI, 2009
As Shimomura-san mentioned.
Wash-out with L-viol.
Therefore,
Only One would…
<38>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Wash-out with L-viol.
<39>
sphaleron
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Therefore,
Only One would…
Wash-out with L-viol.
<40>
(anti-lepton)(baryon)
Do “WASH-OUT”!!
Therefore,
Only One would…
Wash-out with L-viol.
<41>
(baryon)
Therefore,
Only One would…
Wash-out with L-viol.
<42>
(baryon)
Therefore,
Only One would…
Now We Know
To avoid the WASH-OUT,
All must be small enough, and
If all flavors are mixed
→ All must be small enough.
<43>
These are what we studied!
Now We Know
To avoid the WASH-OUT,
All must be small enough, and
If all flavors are mixed
→ All must be small enough.
<44>
These are what we studied!
How SMALL must be?
When MIX?
Now We Know
To avoid the WASH-OUT,
All must be small enough, and
If all flavors are mixed
→ All must be small enough.
<45>
And we will claim that…
This is naturally expected!
All of them areseverely constrained!
<46>
3. Our Results
INDEX
Methods
We calculated
by Boltzmann Eq.
<47>
Lepton number density in i-th generation
Large LFV Tiny LFV
(All must be small.)
Methods
<48>
LFV
Generally NOT diagonal
As Shimomura-san discussed.
Methods
<49>
LFV
Diagonalizeby rotation
“mixing angle”
LFV
Methods
<50>
For example
(We know , because we know the lepton masses.)
LFV causes Mixing.
Not mixed
Result
<51>
Fully Mixed!
“Mixed”
Conclusion
<52>
→ MIXED
This corresponds to
Remember:
By the way,
Conclusion
<53>
Right-handed neutrino
SU(5) GUT (Colored Higgs)
Conclusion
<54>
→ MIXED
Expected Value
Naturally Expected!Experimental Reach
Now We Know
To avoid the WASH-OUT,
All must be small enough, and
If all flavors are mixed
→ All must be small enough.
<55>
This is naturally expected!
These are ALLseverely constrained!
Constraints on RpVs
In a similar manner…
→ calculated by the Boltzmann Eq.
We obtained the bounds for
R-parity violating couplings.
<56>
Just the results…
<57>
(For all i, j, k)
For
<58>
4. Application for LHC
“Now we have a good tool
to study LHC phenomenology of RpV-MSSM.”
INDEX
SUSY Detection @ LHC
SUSY detection in LHC is important.
R-parity is Conserved → LSP Signal
Then if not?
→ LSP decays!How to detect RpV-SUSY?
<59>
Application for LHC
Stringent RpV-constraint of order
→ LSP is a bit “long-lived.”
Example: ( -LSP)
<60>
Decay Length
(cf. tau-lepton: )
To be a good signal of RpV-SUSY?→ Future works!
That’s all.
Thank you
for listening.<61>
Summary
<62>
MSSM
& areALL small.
LFV!!
LSP would bea bit long-livedeven if
NO R-Parity.
R-parity is not a must.
Appendices
A) Hierarchy Problem
B) Weak points of RpV-MSSM
C) Collider Constraints
D) The RpV Results
E) Several Details
F) Experimental LFV Bounds
<63>
INDEX
JUMP
JUMP
JUMP
JUMP
JUMP
JUMP
<64>
A. Hierarchy Problem
“In the Standard Model,
the quantum correction for the mass of the Higgs
requires a miraculous cancellation as
”
INDEX
APPENDICES
Hierarchy Problem
In the
Standard Modelwith Higgs,
<65>
Hierarchy Problem
<66>
Hierarchy Problem
In
MSSM(or other SUSY models),
<67>
Hierarchy Problem
<68>
And its superpartner goes round! Cancelled!
<69>
B. Weak Points of RpV-MSSM
“The RpV-MSSM has some weak points,
but anyway important for the SUSY detection.”
INDEX
APPENDICES
Weak point of “RpV-MSSM”
Weak Points
Anyway we need “some symmetry.”
Dark Matter → left unsolved.
GUT compatibility… (´・ω・`)
<70>
<71>
C. Collider Constraints
“The RpV interactions are constrainedby several experimental facts.”
INDEX
APPENDICES
Constraints
The RpV parameters
→ experimental constraints
And the constraints are important
to study RpV-MSSM.
<72>
Constraints
Example:
<73>
Standard Model RpV-MSSM
Additional Contribution!
Constraints
Example:
<74>
Standard Model RpV-MSSM
Additional Contribution!
<75>
D. RpV Results
INDEX
APPENDICES
RpV Result
<76>
[GeV]
RpV Result
<77>
[GeV]
RpV Result
<78>
[GeV]
RpV Result
<79>
[GeV]
<80>
E. Several Details
Approximations we used
Set up
MSSM; before EWPT (sphaleron era: )
Approximations
We consider only the decay of Higgsino
and the antiparticles’ processes.
Mass of Higgs bosons → Ignored
Fermi/Bose distribution → Boltzmann distribution
Sphaleron → Shut off at .
<81>
Some Loophole
We can avoid any “wash-out”
with creating the current B-asymmetry
HERE.
<82>
<83>
F. Experimental LFV Bounds
MEGA Result / MEG Prospect
<84>
top related