contents tables - department of state development ...eisdocs.dsdip.qld.gov.au/sunshine coast airport...
Post on 28-Mar-2018
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
CONTENTS
6.1 Introduction ........................................................................609
6.1.1 Hazard and risk .........................................................609
6.2 Risk assessment ...............................................................609
6.2.1 Approach .....................................................................609
6.2.2 Risk register ................................................................609
6.2.3 Change in risk profile ..............................................610
6.2.4 Health and safety ......................................................610
6.2.5 Wildlife Hazard Management Plan and Aerodrome Operations Manual ..........................610
6.2.6 Emergency Management Plan ............................610
6.2.7 Counter-terrorism and critical infrastructure protection .........................................610
6.2.8 Aeordrome Rescue and Fire Fighting Service ................................................610
TABLES
6.2a: Risk assessment matrix ..................................................................610
6.2b: Risk identification ...............................................................................611
E6-608 SUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECT
E6 Impact SummaRy & management FRamewoRk
RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
6.1 INTrOduCTION
6.1.1 Hazard and risk
this section provides a high level assessment of the hazards and risks to people and airport operations that may be associated with the Sunshine coast airport (Sca) expansion project (the project).
this risk assessment would provide the basis for future risk management as the project progresses.
the focus of future risk management will transition through design, construction and into operations. the form of the risk processes will be dependent on the procurement approach adopted but will be necessary to address safety in design risks, construction risks and operational risks, which will be addressed through the processes discussed in Sections 6.2 to 6.8.
6.2 rISk ASSESSmENT
6.2.1 Approacha risk assessment was completed for all aspects of the project delivery and operations based on the principles set out in Australia/New Zealand AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management—Principles and Guidelines.
all phases of the project were considered, including:
a) preconstruction
b) civil works
c) Dredging
d) Runway and taxiway pavements
e) operations.
the risk assessment considers the combined likelihood and consequence of a potential event on personal safety and airport operations. an example of a major impact on airport operations would be a breach of airside security.
the risk assessment considered only risks that are considered to be project-specific. general site safety risks, for example, construction worker exposure to loud noise or sun, were not considered. It is expected these would be addressed in the contractor’s health and safety management plan.
the risk was determined based on the consequence and likelihood, as shown in Table 6.2a.
mitigation measures were determined for each risk, and the risk was re-assessed to determine the residual risk rating. all risks retained a residual medium or lower risk rating.
6.2.2 risk register
the risks identified for each project phase are provided in Table 6.2b. Risks have been identified as safety risks (S) or airport operations risks (ao) in the risk type column.
6.2.3 Change in risk profile
the development of the new runway would reduce the operational risk for the airport, owing to the following:
y the new runway is fully compliant with moS 139 for code 4e aircraft, including compliance for:
− Runway length and width
− Runway graded strip and flyover area
− Recommended 240 m runway and safety area.
− there are considerably fewer residences in the public Safety area of the new runway compared with Rwy 18/36
− the alignment of the new runway significantly reduces the occurrence of cross-winds compared with Rwy 18/36.
the likelihood of an aircraft crash on Rwy 13/31 is considered to be highly unlikely. as with any aircraft incident, the potential consequences of a crash would include multiple fatalities. nevertheless, given the very low likelihood of an incident (<1:10,000 chance of a fatality outside the public Safety area) the overall risk level is low.
Table 6.2a: Risk assessment matrix
Consequence
Safety No Injury Injury Fatality
Airport Operations minor moderate major
Likelihood
almost Impossible negligible (n) negligible (n) Low (L)
unlikely negligible (n) Low (L) medium (m)
possible Low (L) medium (m) High (H)
Likely medium (m) High (H) extreme (e)
E6-609environmental impact statement
6.2.4 Health and safety
Sca operates under a civil aviation Safety authority (caSa) approved Safety management System.
6.2.5 Wildlife Hazard management Plan and Aerodrome Operations manual
Sca operates in accordance with a wildlife Hazard management plan and aerodrome operations manual. these documents provide the framework to manage and mitigate operational risks at the airport.
Both of these documents will be redrafted prior to the commissioning of Runway (Rwy) 13/31 as part of the formal process for implementing the changes to airspace and aircraft management. the formal airspace change process is required to obtain certification to operate the new runway and will provide opportunity for commonwealth and State agencies to contribute to the agreed plans.
6.2.6 Emergency management Plan
Sca maintains an internal airport emergency plan.
the aim of the airport emergency plan is to provide a timely and coordinated response to, and recovery from, an emergency at the airport. It covers all manner of potential aviation related emergencies.
the plan details the arrangements for control and co-ordination of the response to, and initial recovery from, an emergency within the airport boundary or in the vicinity of Sunshine coast.
the airport emergency plan was developed to reflect the requirements of:
y civil aviation Safety Regulation part 139 and Icao annex 14 to the convention on International civil aviation
y Disaster Management Act 2003
y Sunshine coast council emergency operation plan
y Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) Act 1991
y QaS multi casualty management plan.
this document is supported by a number of Standard operating procedures (Sops).
Sca would revise the existing airport emergency plan to include operations on the new runway before it is commissioned.
Sca also maintains the following:
y a cyclone plan to address severe weather at Sca and weather events farther afield that might impact on ops at Sca
y a pandemic Influenza management plan
all of these documents have been produced in concert with the relevant local, state and commonwealth agencies, including airservices, Queensland police Service, Queensland Fire and emergency Service (QFeS), Queensland ambulance Service, State emergency Service and the Local Disaster management group (LDmg). the LDmg is responsible for preparing and implementing council’s Local Disaster management plan.
6.2.7 Counter-terrorism and critical infrastructure protection
the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 (cth) (atSa) establishes a regulatory framework to safeguard against acts of unlawful interference with aviation, in respect of australian registered aircraft in australian airspace and airports.
Sca, as the airport operator, is responsible for security at the airport and is obliged to have a transport Security program (tSp) under the atSa. the Sca transport Security program is confidential and only available to the airport and the commonwealth government.
6.2.8 Aviation rescue and Fire Fighting Service
the airport has a fully equipped aviation Rescue and Fire Fighting Service (aRFFS) facility to address all aviation related fire and rescue events. aRFFS are regulated under the civil aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (caSR 1998) part 139H, which specifies the requirements for the provision of aviation rescue and fire fighting services.
airservices australia (airservices) currently provide category 6 aRFFS for Sca. airservices is responsible for the provision of personnel, training and facilities to support aRFFS.
the project includes development of a site south of Rwy 13/31 for establishment of a joint air traffic control tower and new aRFFS station, which would be built by airservices. airservices would continue to provide aRFFS after commissioning the new runway in accordance with caSR 1998 part 139H.
with respect to fires located on adjoining lands, aRFFS may, at the request of QFeS, assist in off-site events provided that such assistance does not compromise their capacity to manage aviation incidents.
E6-610
Impact Summary & management Framework
RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6
SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect
Tabl
e 6.
2b: R
isk
iden
tifica
tion
Aspect
Impact
risk Type
Likelihood
Consequence
risk
mitigation
Likelihood
Consequence
residual risk
Pre
cons
truc
tion
No
proj
ect
spec
ific
risk
s id
entifi
ed
civ
il w
orks
upg
rade
to F
inla
nd
Roa
d –
inst
alla
tion
of tr
affic
ligh
ts a
t D
avid
Low
way
in
ters
ectio
n
wor
ks a
t an
activ
e in
ters
ectio
n co
uld
lead
to a
traf
fic a
ccid
ent
Sp
ossi
ble
Fata
lity
HIm
plem
ent t
raffi
c co
ntro
ls
and
man
agem
ent p
lan
durin
g co
nstr
uctio
n.
unl
ikel
yFa
talit
ym
clo
sure
of
Rw
y 1
2/30
airc
raft
may
land
on
the
clos
ed r
unw
ay.
ao
pos
sibl
em
ajor
HIm
plem
ent c
losu
re in
ac
cord
ance
with
ca
Sa
re
quire
men
ts.
unl
ikel
ym
ajor
m
airs
ide
fenc
e re
alig
nmen
tB
reac
hes
in th
e ai
rsid
e fe
nce
may
lead
to
a b
reac
h of
sec
urity
.a
op
ossi
ble
maj
orH
pre
scrib
e co
nstr
uctio
n se
quen
cing
and
sec
urity
re
quire
men
ts d
urin
g pe
rimet
er
fenc
e m
odifi
catio
ns
unl
ikel
ym
ajor
m
wor
k on
the
airs
ide
fenc
e re
alig
nmen
t cl
ose
to R
wy
18/
36 m
ay e
xten
d up
to 5
m
into
the
oLS
.
ao
pos
sibl
em
oder
ate
mIs
sue
not
ice
to a
irmen
(no
tam
) an
d/or
sch
edul
e w
orks
to a
void
ai
rcra
ft m
ovem
ents
.
pos
sibl
em
inor
L
upg
rade
/co
nstr
uctio
n of
si
te r
oads
Roa
d w
orks
in a
irsid
e ar
eas
may
im
ping
e on
the
oLS
or
intr
oduc
e fo
reig
n ob
ject
dam
age
(Fo
D) t
o R
wy
18/
36.
ao
pos
sibl
em
ajor
HLi
mit
the
heig
ht o
f equ
ipm
ent
used
for
airs
ide
road
wor
k an
d/or
sch
edul
e w
orks
to a
void
ai
rcra
ft m
ovem
ent.
Impl
emen
t du
st c
ontr
ol a
nd c
lean
up
pro
cedu
res.
unl
ikel
ym
ajor
m
Site
cle
arin
gR
emov
al o
f veg
etat
ion
may
incr
ease
w
ildlif
e ac
tivity
thro
ugh
disp
ersa
l of
dist
urbe
d w
ildlif
e an
d po
tent
ially
attr
act
rapt
ors,
whi
ch c
ould
lead
to b
ird s
trik
es.
ao
Like
lym
oder
ate
HS
tage
cle
arin
g to
min
imis
e fa
una
mov
emen
t int
o op
en a
reas
(i.e
. cl
ear
tow
ards
the
rem
aini
ng
vege
tatio
n). I
mpl
emen
t bird
su
rvei
llanc
e an
d di
sper
sal
tech
niqu
es to
dis
cour
age
bird
s ne
ar th
e ex
istin
g ru
nway
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
E6-611environmental impact statement
Aspect
Impact
risk Type
Likelihood
Consequence
risk
mitigation
Likelihood
Consequence
residual riskP
reco
nstr
uctio
nN
o pr
ojec
t sp
ecifi
c ri
sks
iden
tified
eart
hwor
ksea
rthw
orks
for
site
infra
stru
ctur
e (s
uch
as in
tern
al h
aul r
oads
) cou
ld g
ener
ate
dust
, whi
ch c
ould
pre
sent
a h
azar
d to
ai
rcra
ft m
ovem
ents
.
ao
Like
lym
oder
ate
HIm
plem
ent a
dus
t man
agem
ent
plan
, with
str
inge
nt r
equi
rem
ents
w
ithin
300
m o
f Rw
y 1
8/36
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
con
stru
ctio
n of
nor
ther
n pe
rimet
er d
rain
the
pres
ence
of s
tand
ing
wat
er in
the
part
ially
con
stru
cted
dra
in c
ould
attr
act
bird
s, w
hich
cou
ld le
ad to
bird
str
ikes
.
ao
Like
lym
oder
ate
HIm
plem
ent b
ird s
urve
illan
ce
and
disp
ersa
l tec
hniq
ues
to
disc
oura
ge b
irds.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
the
use
of la
rge
eart
hmov
ing
mac
hine
ry a
ppro
x. 5
0 m
from
the
VHF-
omni
dire
ctio
nal r
adar
(Vo
R) w
ould
af
fect
its
perf
orm
ance
.
ao
Like
lym
ajor
eth
e Vo
R w
ould
nee
d to
be
relo
cate
d be
fore
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es o
ccur
nea
r th
e so
uth-
east
end
of t
he c
onst
ruct
ion
area
.
alm
ost
Impo
ssib
lem
ajor
L
con
stru
ctio
n of
per
imet
er
recl
amat
ion
bund
an
d po
lishi
ng
pond
wal
l
the
pres
ence
of s
ite r
unof
f with
in th
e bu
nd c
ould
attr
act b
irds,
whi
ch c
ould
le
ad to
bird
str
ikes
.. th
e po
lishi
ng p
ond
wou
ld b
e lo
cate
d ap
prox
. 2 k
m fr
om
Ry
w 1
8/36
.
ao
pos
sibl
em
oder
ate
mIm
plem
ent b
ird s
urve
illan
ce
and
disp
ersa
l tec
hniq
ues
to
disc
oura
ge b
irds.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
Dre
dge
pipe
line
inst
alla
tion
pub
lic s
afet
y at
the
cons
truc
tion
site
on
mar
cool
a be
ach
durin
g pi
pelin
e as
sem
bly.
Sp
ossi
ble
Fata
lity
Hth
e be
ach
wou
ld b
e te
mpo
raril
y cl
osed
dur
ing
asse
mbl
y of
th
e sa
nd p
ipel
ine.
. pro
visi
on
for
alte
rnat
ive
publ
ic a
nd
emer
genc
y ve
hicl
e ac
cess
wou
ld
be p
rovi
ded
arou
nd th
e ac
tive
cons
truc
tion
site
.
unl
ikel
yIn
jury
L
pub
lic s
afet
y w
hen
the
pipe
line
is b
eing
dr
agge
d fro
m th
e be
ach
to th
e m
oorin
g po
int.
Sp
ossi
ble
Fata
lity
Hth
e pu
blic
wou
ld b
e as
ked
to
stay
cle
ar o
f the
ope
ratio
nal a
rea
durin
g th
e w
orks
. not
e: t
he
Reg
iona
l Har
bour
mas
ter
may
re
quire
a te
mpo
rary
exc
lusi
on
zone
bet
wee
n th
e be
ach
and
the
off-
shor
e pu
mp
out l
ocat
ion.
unl
ikel
yFa
talit
ym
E6-612
Impact Summary & management Framework
RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6
SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect
Aspect
Impact
risk Type
Likelihood
Consequence
risk
mitigation
Likelihood
Consequence
residual riskP
reco
nstr
uctio
nN
o pr
ojec
t sp
ecifi
c ri
sks
iden
tified
Dre
dge
pipe
line
inst
alla
tion
pub
lic s
afet
y w
hen
the
pipe
line
is b
eing
dr
agge
d fro
m th
e be
ach
to th
e pu
mp-
out s
ite.
Sp
ossi
ble
Fata
lity
Hth
e pu
blic
wou
ld b
e as
ked
to
stay
cle
ar o
f the
ope
ratio
nal a
rea
durin
g th
e w
orks
. not
e: t
he
Reg
iona
l Har
bour
mas
ter
may
re
quire
a te
mpo
rary
exc
lusi
on
zone
bet
wee
n th
e be
ach
and
the
off-
shor
e pu
mp
out l
ocat
ion.
unl
ikel
yFa
talit
ym
a m
embe
r of
the
publ
ic c
ould
fall
whi
le
tryi
ng tr
y to
cro
ss th
e sa
nd p
ipel
ine.
SLi
kely
Inju
ryH
ped
estr
ian
acce
ss w
ould
be
prov
ided
ove
r th
e sa
nd p
ipel
ine
abov
e th
e hi
gh-t
ide
mar
k on
ce it
is in
stal
led.
the
acc
ess
wou
ld b
e de
sign
ed to
ens
ure
safe
and
uni
vers
al a
cces
s. a
ve
hicl
e cr
ossi
ng p
oint
wou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed fo
r em
erge
ncy
vehi
cles
.
unl
ikel
yIn
jury
L
eart
hwor
ks fo
r si
te in
frast
ruct
ure
(suc
h as
inte
rnal
hau
l roa
ds) c
ould
gen
erat
e du
st, w
hich
cou
ld p
rese
nt a
haz
ard
to
airc
raft
mov
emen
ts.
ao
Like
lym
oder
ate
HIm
plem
ent a
dus
t man
agem
ent
plan
, with
str
inge
nt r
equi
rem
ents
w
ithin
300
m o
f Rw
y 1
8/36
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
pip
elin
e in
stal
latio
n eq
uipm
ent t
alle
r th
an 4
.5 m
cou
ld im
ping
e on
the
oLS
of
Rw
y 1
8/36
.
ao
Like
lym
ajor
eIf
equi
pmen
t gre
ater
than
4.5
m
in h
eigh
t is
used
to in
stal
l the
sa
nd p
ipel
ine,
thes
e w
orks
wou
ld
be s
ched
uled
in c
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith a
ir tr
affic
con
trol
(atc
) to
occu
r du
ring
non-
flyin
g ho
urs.
th
e co
ntra
ctor
wou
ld b
e in
co
nsta
nt c
omm
unic
atio
n w
ith
atc
so
that
wor
ks c
ould
be
halte
d an
d th
e ar
ea c
lear
ed if
an
unpl
anne
d fli
ght w
ere
to o
ccur
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
m
E6-613environmental impact statement
Aspect
Impact
risk Type
Likelihood
Consequence
risk
mitigation
Likelihood
Consequence
residual riskP
reco
nstr
uctio
nN
o pr
ojec
t sp
ecifi
c ri
sks
iden
tified
Dre
dge
pipe
line
inst
alla
tion
the
pipe
line
coul
d in
hibi
t acc
ess
by
avi
atio
n R
escu
e an
d Fi
refig
htin
g S
ervi
ce
(aR
FFS
) veh
icle
s to
the
site
of a
n in
cide
nt a
t the
airp
ort.
ao
pos
sibl
em
ajor
Ha
n ac
cess
ram
p ov
er th
e pi
pelin
e w
ould
be
prov
ided
to
ensu
re a
cces
s to
all
area
s of
the
airp
ort..
the
pip
elin
e in
stal
latio
n w
ould
be
stag
ed to
ens
ure
that
acc
ess
over
the
pipe
line
is
avai
labl
e at
all
times
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
the
pipe
line
coul
d in
hibi
t acc
ess
by a
RFF
S v
ehic
les
to th
e si
te o
f an
inci
dent
at t
he a
irpor
t.
ao
pos
sibl
em
ajor
Ha
n ac
cess
ram
p ov
er th
e pi
pelin
e w
ould
be
prov
ided
to
ensu
re a
cces
s to
all
area
s of
the
airp
ort..
the
pip
elin
e in
stal
latio
n w
ould
be
stag
ed to
ens
ure
that
acc
ess
over
the
pipe
line
is
avai
labl
e at
all
times
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
San
d pu
mpi
nga
pip
e bu
rst c
ould
occ
ur o
n m
arco
ola
beac
h.S
unl
ikel
yIn
jury
Lth
e co
nditi
on o
f the
san
d pi
pelin
e w
ould
be
mon
itore
d an
d im
med
iate
act
ion
wou
ld b
e ta
ken
in th
e ev
ent o
f a s
igni
fican
t le
ak.
unl
ikel
yn
o in
jury
n
a p
ipe
burs
t cou
ld o
ccur
in a
n ai
rsid
e ar
ea.
ao
unl
ikel
ym
ajor
Hth
e co
nditi
on o
f the
san
d pi
pelin
e w
ould
be
mon
itore
d an
d im
med
iate
act
ion
wou
ld b
e ta
ken
in th
e ev
ent o
f a s
igni
fican
t le
ak.
unl
ikel
ym
inor
n
pot
entia
l int
erac
tion
betw
een
the
dred
ger
and/
or tu
g, a
nd r
ecre
atio
nal o
r fis
hing
ves
sels
.
Sp
ossi
ble
Fata
lity
Hth
e pu
mp-
out a
rea
wou
ld
be m
arke
d-ou
t with
buo
ys
and
advi
sory
sig
ns w
ould
be
inst
alle
d. n
ote:
the
Reg
iona
l H
arbo
ur m
aste
r m
ay r
equi
re a
te
mpo
rary
exc
lusi
on z
one
for
the
dura
tion
of th
e pu
mpi
ng
activ
ities
.
unl
ikel
yIn
jury
L
E6-614
Impact Summary & management Framework
RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6
SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect
Aspect
Impact
risk Type
Likelihood
Consequence
risk
mitigation
Likelihood
Consequence
residual riskP
reco
nstr
uctio
nN
o pr
ojec
t sp
ecifi
c ri
sks
iden
tified
tailw
ater
m
anag
emen
tta
ilwat
er in
the
polis
hing
pon
d an
d w
ater
bei
ng p
umpe
d to
site
cou
ld
attr
act b
irds,
whi
ch c
ould
lead
to
bird
str
ikes
.
ao
pos
sibl
em
oder
ate
mIm
plem
ent b
ird s
urve
illan
ce
and
disp
ersa
l tec
hniq
ues
to
disc
oura
ge b
irds.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
the
polis
hing
pon
d w
all c
ould
fail,
re
leas
ing
tailw
ater
. pot
entia
l dam
age
from
a fa
ilure
wou
ld b
e lim
ited
to o
n-si
te c
onst
ruct
ion-
phas
e in
frast
ruct
ure
(suc
h as
the
perim
eter
roa
d).
Su
nlik
ely
Fata
lity
mD
esig
n th
e po
nd w
all w
ith a
n ap
prop
riate
fact
or o
f saf
ety.
R
egul
ar in
spec
tion
of b
und
wal
l int
egrit
y.
alm
ost
Impo
ssib
leFa
talit
yL
tailw
ater
m
anag
emen
tth
e pr
esen
ce o
f app
rox.
1.5
m d
eep
of w
ater
in th
e po
lishi
ng p
ond
coul
d pr
esen
t a s
afet
y ha
zard
. the
pol
ishi
ng
pond
wou
ld b
e se
cure
d to
pre
vent
pu
blic
acc
ess
to th
e ar
ea.
Su
nlik
ely
Fata
lity
mth
e po
nd w
all w
ould
be
desi
gned
with
a w
ide
enou
gh
cres
t to
allo
w s
afe
acce
ss
arou
nd th
e po
nd.
unl
ikel
yFa
talit
ym
pav
emen
t c
onst
ruct
ion
San
d tr
imm
ing
eart
hwor
ks d
urin
g sa
nd tr
imm
ing
coul
d ge
nera
te d
ust,
whi
ch c
ould
pre
sent
a
haza
rd to
airc
raft
mov
emen
ts.
ao
Like
lym
oder
ate
HIm
plem
ent a
dus
t man
agem
ent
plan
, with
str
inge
nt r
equi
rem
ents
w
ithin
300
m o
f Rw
y 1
8/36
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
pav
emen
t co
nstr
uctio
nD
eliv
ery
of p
avem
ent m
ater
ials
to s
ite
wou
ld in
crea
se th
e m
ovem
ent o
f lar
ge
vehi
cles
bet
wee
n th
e so
urce
qua
rry
and
the
site
, whi
ch c
ould
intr
oduc
e tr
affic
ha
zard
s.
Sp
ossi
ble
Fata
lity
HIm
plem
ent a
traf
fic m
anag
emen
t pl
an, w
hich
wou
ld c
onsi
der
haul
rou
tes
and
appr
oved
trav
el
times
.
unl
ikel
yFa
talit
ym
Sto
ckpi
ling
and
prep
arin
g pa
vem
ent
mat
eria
ls c
ould
gen
erat
e du
st,
whi
ch c
ould
pre
sent
a h
azar
d to
airc
raft
mov
emen
ts.
ao
Like
lym
oder
ate
HLo
cate
the
pave
men
t sto
ckpi
ling
and
batc
hing
are
a aw
ay fr
om
Rw
y 1
8/36
. Im
plem
ent a
dus
t m
anag
emen
t pla
n, w
ith s
trin
gent
re
quire
men
ts w
ithin
300
m o
f R
wy
18/
36.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
E6-615environmental impact statement
Aspect
Impact
risk Type
Likelihood
Consequence
risk
mitigation
Likelihood
Consequence
residual riskP
reco
nstr
uctio
nN
o pr
ojec
t sp
ecifi
c ri
sks
iden
tified
pav
emen
t co
nstr
uctio
n w
ithin
Rw
y 1
8/36
ru
nway
str
ip
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es w
ithin
the
runw
ay
strip
pre
sent
an
obst
acle
and
dus
t/Fo
D
haza
rd to
airc
raft.
ao
Like
lym
ajor
eIt
is p
lann
ed to
tem
pora
rily
oper
ate
Rw
y 1
3/31
with
a
disp
lace
d th
resh
old
so th
at
Rw
y 1
8/36
cou
ld b
e te
mpo
raril
y cl
osed
dur
ing
the
wor
ks. a
t thi
s tim
e, a
ll fli
ghts
wou
ld b
e fro
m/
to R
wy
13/
31. c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ities
wou
ld b
e m
anag
ed
unde
r a
‘met
hod
of w
orki
ng
pla
n’, w
hich
will
be
prep
ared
in
conj
unct
ion
with
Sc
a a
irpor
t op
erat
ions
per
sonn
el a
nd
airs
ervi
ces
aus
tral
ia.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
apr
on e
xten
sion
an
d ta
xiw
ay
chan
ges
at th
e w
este
rn g
ener
al
avi
atio
n (g
a) a
rea
con
stru
ctio
n of
the
apro
n ex
pans
ion
and
chan
ges
to th
e R
wy
12/
30
taxi
way
s in
trod
uces
con
flict
s fo
r th
e ex
istin
g g
a fa
cilit
ies
wes
t of
the
term
inal
.
ao
Like
lym
oder
ate
Hth
e pr
ojec
t pha
sing
wou
ld
need
to c
onsi
der
prov
idin
g ac
cess
from
the
wes
tern
ga
ar
ea to
Rw
y 1
8/36
thro
ugho
ut
the
wor
ks. t
his
may
incl
ude
cons
truc
tion
of te
mpo
rary
ta
xiw
ays
arou
nd c
onst
ruct
ion
area
s or
sim
ilar
tem
pora
ry
wor
ks.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
E6-616
Impact Summary & management Framework
RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6
SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect
Aspect
Impact
risk Type
Likelihood
Consequence
risk
mitigation
Likelihood
Consequence
residual riskP
reco
nstr
uctio
nN
o pr
ojec
t sp
ecifi
c ri
sks
iden
tified
term
inal
upg
rade
pub
lic a
cces
s to
an
activ
e co
nstr
uctio
n si
te p
rese
nts
safe
ty h
azar
ds.
Sp
ossi
ble
Inju
rym
cor
don
off c
onst
ruct
ion
area
s an
d di
vert
the
publ
ic a
roun
d un
safe
are
as. e
rect
app
ropr
iate
w
arni
ng s
igns
.
unl
ikel
yIn
jury
L
wor
ks in
airs
ide
area
s co
uld
intr
oduc
e du
st a
nd F
oD
haz
ards
for
airc
raft.
ao
pos
sibl
em
oder
ate
mc
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ities
wou
ld
be m
anag
ed u
nder
a ‘m
etho
d of
wor
king
pla
n’, w
hich
will
be
pre
pare
d in
con
junc
tion
with
Sc
a a
irpor
t ope
ratio
ns
pers
onne
l and
airs
ervi
ces
aus
tral
ia.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
una
utho
rised
airs
ide
acce
ss p
rese
nts
a se
curit
y ha
zard
.a
op
ossi
ble
maj
orm
mai
ntai
n an
d im
plem
ent
airs
ide
secu
rity
mea
sure
s. o
nly
auth
oris
ed c
onst
ruct
ion
wor
kers
to
hav
e ai
rsid
e ac
cess
.
unl
ikel
ym
oder
ate
L
ope
ratio
ns
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
new
ope
ratin
g pr
oced
ures
Impr
oper
impl
emen
tatio
n of
flig
ht
proc
edur
es p
rese
nts
airc
raft
oper
atio
ns
haza
rds.
ao
pos
sibl
em
ajor
Hu
nder
take
com
mis
sion
ing
and
intr
oduc
tion
of n
ew p
roce
dure
s in
acc
orda
nce
with
est
ablis
hed
guid
elin
es a
nd in
liai
son
with
c
aS
a a
nd a
irser
vice
s a
ustr
alia
in
clud
ing
upda
te o
f man
agem
ent
plan
s to
obt
ain
runw
ay
cert
ifica
tion.
Issu
e ap
prop
riate
n
ota
m in
lead
-up
to r
unw
ay
open
ing.
unl
ikel
ym
ajor
m
E6-617environmental impact statement
top related