considerations in application of mcpt in evaluating asr ... · considerations in application of...

Post on 22-Apr-2018

223 Views

Category:

Documents

4 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Prasad Rangaraju

Enamur Latifee

Sai Sudhir Reddy Enugula

Clemson University, SC

Considerations in Application of MCPT in Evaluating

ASR Potential of Job Concrete Mixtures

Advances in AAR Test Methods for Evaluation of Job Concrete Mixtures, Part I

Clemson University 2/36

Acknowledgements

o Federal Highway Administration

o Portland Cement Association

o Lehigh Cement

o ARGOS Cement

o Aggregate Suppliers

Clemson University 3/36

Overview

o Brief Review of Existing Test Methods for ASR

o Review of Mini Concrete Prism Test (MCPT)

o Field Concrete Factors that affect ASR Testing

o Experimental Investigation To Evaluate Role of

Specific Concrete Mixture Variables (Job Concrete)

on Expansion due to ASR

o Conclusions

Clemson University 4/36

Existing AAR Test Methods in ASTM

ASR

o ASTM C 227 – Mortar Bar Test

o ASTM C 289 – Quick Chemical Test

o ASTM C 295 – Petrographic Examination

o ASTM C 1260 – Accelerated Mortar Bar Test (AMBT)

o ASTM C 1293 – Concrete Prism Test (CPT)

ACR

o ASTM C 295 – Petrographic Examination

o ASTM C 586 – Rock Cylinder Test

o ASTM C 1105 – Concrete Prism Test

Clemson University 5/36

Miniature Concrete Prism Test

(AASHTO TP110)

o MCPT is developed based on modifications to CPT

and AMBT methods. The improvements over the

standard test methods are :

o No significant aggregate crushing is involved

o No alkali leaching

o Short test duration o 56 days (8 Weeks) for majority of aggregates

o 84 days (12 weeks) for slow reacting aggregates

o Can detect both ASR and ACR

o Can evaluate both aggregate reactivity and SCM

effectiveness

o Potential to evaluate job concrete mixtures

Clemson University 6/36

MCPT Method (AASHTO TP 110)

o Cement Content = 708 lb/yd3 (420 kg/m3)

o Cement Alkali Content = 0.9% ± 0.1% Na2Oeq.

o Alkali Boost, (Total Alkali Content) = 1.25% Na2Oeq.

o Water-to-cement ratio (fixed) = 0.45

o Coarse Agg. Dry-Rodded Vol. Frac. = 0.65 (MSA: ½ in.)

o Storage Environment* = 1N NaOH Solution

(Soak)

o Storage Temperature = 60⁰C

o Specimen Size = 2 in. x 2 in. x 11.75 in.

1 N NaOH @ 60ºC

Clemson University 7/36

MCPT Measurementso 1st Day = Water bath at 60 ⁰C

o Subsequent Storage = 1N NaOH @ 60⁰C

o Length Change Measurement = 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42,

56, 70, 84 days

o Non-reactive sand is used with reactive coarse agg, and vice-

versa.

Clemson University 8/36

MCPT Specimen Size

Clemson University 9/36

MCPT Validation

o Evaluated 33 aggregates with known field

performance

o Limited set of 12 aggregates were tested in

MCPT, CPT and AMBT for correlations

o Evaluated 20 different SCMs (fly ash, slag,

meta-kaolin, silica fume)

Clemson University 10/36

MCPT-56 day versus CPT – 365 day

Clemson University 11/36

MCPT-56 day versus AMBT – 14 day

Clemson University 12/36

Expansion Criteria for Classifying Aggregate Reactivity

(Latifee and Rangaraju, 2015)

Clemson University 13/36

Expansion Criteria for characterizing

effectiveness of ASR Mitigation measures (MCPT)

Clemson University 14/36

Multi-lab Testing of MCPT

Correlation between 56-Day % Exp. and COV

Mix 2 (Avg. Exp = 0.578%)

Mix 1 (Avg. Exp = 0.134%)

Mix 3 (Avg, Exp = 0.033%)

Mix 4 (Avg.Exp = 0.015%)

Clemson University 15/36

MCPT - AASHTO TP 110

o AASHTO has

approved this

method as a

provisional

standard

AASHTO TP 110

MCPT for Evaluating ASR

Potential of Job Mixtures

Clemson University 17/36

Influence of Job mix parameters on

ASR expansion

o Typical job mix parameters that differ from the standard MCPT

method were considered.

o Univariate analysis:

o Influence of w/c (0.40 – 0.50)

o Influence of total cement content (600 -800 lb/yd3)

o Influence of total alkali loading in concrete (2.9 – 10lb/yd3)

o Influence of dosage of SCM (15% - 35% Class F fly ash)

o Influence of vol. fraction of CA content in concrete (0.65 –

0.75)

o Influence of pore solution alkalinity

Clemson University 18/36

Effect of pore solution on the % expansion in the MPCT

o SHRP C-342 (Helmuth et.al. 1993) proposed the following:

o [OH-] = 0.339 Na2O % / (w/c) + 0.022 +/- 0.06 mol/L

0.000

0.040

0.080

0.120

0.160

0.200

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84

Ex

pa

nsi

on

, %

Age, Days

HighAlk, boosted 1.25%, 1N sol

AC 0.82%, 0.7 N sol

AC 0.49%, 0.45N sol

R² = 0.895

R² = 0.9969

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

0.140

0.160

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1%

Ex

pa

nsi

on

Soak Solution Alk., N NaOH

Expansion at 56-day

Expansion at 28-day

Clemson University 19/36

Effect of w/c ratio on the expansion of test

specimens with high- and low-alkali cement

0.000

0.040

0.080

0.120

0.160

0.200

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84

Exp

an

sion

, %

Age, Days

0.50 w/c

0.45 w/c

0.40 w/c

0.000

0.040

0.080

0.120

0.160

0.200

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84

Exp

an

sion

, %

Age, Days

0.50 w/c0.45 w/c0.40 w/c

0.1207 0.1230 0.1235

0.0287 0.03100.0375

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

0.140

0.160

0.180

0.200

0.40 w/c 0.45 w/c 0.50 w/c%

Exp

an

sion

at

56 d

ays

Water to Cement Ratio

High Alkali CementLow Alkali Cement

Cement Content = 708 lb/yd3

HA

LA

Clemson University 20/36

Effect of cement content on expansion in

MCPT with High and Low Alkali Cement

0.0000

0.0400

0.0800

0.1200

0.1600

0.2000

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84

Exp

an

sion

, %

Age, Days

800 lbs/yd3

700lbs/yd3

600 lbs/yd3

0.0000

0.0400

0.0800

0.1200

0.1600

0.2000

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84

Exp

an

sion

, %

Age, Days

800 lbs/yd3700lbs/yd3600 lbs/yd3

y = 0.0167x + 0.0843

R² = 0.9287

y = 0.0059x + 0.0202

R² = 0.9767

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

0.140

0.160

600 lb/yd3 700 lb/yd3 800 lb/yd3

% E

xp

an

sion

at

56

-day

Cement Content

High Alkali

Low Alkali

w/c =0.45

HA

LA

Clemson University 21/36

Effect of total alkali loading in concrete on

MCPT expansion

Cement Content,

lb/yd3

Total Alkali

Loading

(lb/yd3)

56-Day Expansion (%)

600 (Na2Oeq. = 0.49%) 2.94 0.027

700 (Na2Oeq. = 0.49%) 3.43 0.031

800 (Na2Oeq. = 0.49%) 3.92 0.039

600 (Na2Oeq. = 1.25%) 7.5 0.098

700 (Na2Oeq. = 1.25%) 8.75 0.123

800 (Na2Oeq. = 1.25%) 10 0.132

Clemson University 22/36

Effect of Alkali Loading in Concrete on

Expansion in MCPT

R² = 0.9937

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

0.140

0.160

0 5 10 15

% E

xp

an

sio

n a

t 56

Da

ys

Alkali loading Na2Oe%, lb/yd3

HA Cement

LA Cement

Clemson University 23/36

Effect of Vol.Fraction of CA on Expansion in

MCPT

Clemson University 24/36

Effect of Fly Ash Dosage on Expansion in MCPT

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Exp

an

sion

, %

Dosage %

Low Lime

High Lime

Clemson University 25/36

Evaluating Job Mixture ASR Potential

o (a) Standard MCPT tests

o Control Test - 100% Cement (Std. Test Proportions)

o Mitigation Test – SCM Dosage (Std. Test Proportions)

o (b) Job MCPT test

o Control Test – 100 % Cement (per job mix proportions)

o Mitigation Test – SCM Dosage (per job mix proportions)

Clemson University 26/36

ASR Performance Index of Concrete (PI)

o ASR Performance Index (PI) can be defined as follows:

PI = [(Ec- Ej) x100%] / Ec

o Ec = 56-day MCPT expansion of control MCPT mixture

o Ej = 56-day MCPT expansion of mitigated MCPT mixture

Clemson University 27/36

Job mix and Job control mix expansion curves

0.0070

0.0550

0.00

0.04

0.08

0.12

0.16

0.20

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84

Exp

an

sion

, %

Age, Days

Victor Job Mix (40% slag) Soak Sln =

0.55N NaOH

Victor Control Mix (100% cement) Soak

Sln = 0.55N NaOH

0.0515

0.00

0.04

0.08

0.12

0.16

0.20

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84

Exp

an

sion

, %

Age, Days

Tango Control (100% cement) Soak Soln.

0.55N

Tango Job-mix (15% fly ash) Soak soln.

0.55N

Pijob = 87% Pijob = 1%

Clemson University 28/36

ASR Performance Index of Concrete (PI)

o PIstandard = [(Esc- Esm) x100%] / Esc

o PIJob = [(Ejc- Ejm) x100%] / Ejc

o Example Specification Could be:

PIJob > 0.90 x PIstandard

Clemson University 29/36

Conclusionso The proposed MCPT method overcomes many of the

deficiencies of existing standard ASR test methods

o MCPT Method shows potential to be a reliable and a rapid test

method to evaluate wide range of aggregates and ASR

mitigation measures and provides a result comparable to ASTM C 1293 test in a much shorter duration of only 8 to 12

weeks.

o Among the mixture proportion variables considered, the alkali

loading in concrete and SCM dosage level appear to be the

dominant factors affecting the ASR expansion.

o Preliminary testing to evaluate job mixtures using MCPT

appears to be promising, and the performance index (PI) may

provide a quantifiable way to assess ASR potential of job mix.

Questions?

prasad@clemson.edu

Clemson University 31/36

Key Questions for MCPT

o Why 56 days?

o Why 60ºC storage temperature?

o Why 1N NaOH Soak Solution?

o Why a dry-rodded aggregate volume

fraction of 0.65 in the concrete?

top related