concept of operations and standard operating...
Post on 26-Sep-2018
296 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Concept of Operations and SOP
January 2012
North Florida TPO1022 Prudential DriveJacksonville, FL 32207
Concept of Operations and Standard Operating Procedures
For Dynamic Detour System
Ta
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
able of Cont
Introdu
1.1. Defi
Purpos
2.1. Syst
2.2. Docu
System
3.1. Proj
3.2. Syst
State o
4.1. Regi4.2. Flor
4.3. FHW4.4. USD
4.5. Minn
4.6. Mich4.7. Simu
Dynam
5.1. Dete
5.2. Veri5.3. Noti
5.4. Resp5.5. Clea
5.6. Reco
5.7. Traf5.8. Trav
5.9. Afte
Event a
6.1. Even6.1.1.
6.1.2.
6.2. Incid6.2.1.
6.2.2. 6.2.3.
6.2.4.
Stakeh
7.1. Plan7.2. Tran
7.3. Law
tents
uction .......
nition of Sta
se ..............
tems Engine
ument Outli
m Overview
ect Definitio
tem Backgro
of Practice
ional Existinida DOT’s A
WA’s AlternaDOT’s Integr
nesota DOT
higan DOT’sulation Stud
ic Detour
ection ..........
fication ......fication ......
ponse ..........arance .........
overy ..........
fic Managemveler Inform
er Action Re
and Incide
nt Types .....Planned Ev
Unplanned
dent Types .28BCatastroph
29BMajor Incid30BIntermedia
31BMinor Incid
olders’ Ro
nning Organnsportation/
Enforceme
.................
andard Term
.................
eering “V” ..
ine ...............
w ...............
on and Scop
ound ............
e Review .
ng State of Arterial DMS
ate Route Hrated Corrid
’s I-494 Inte
I-75 Integrdies ..............
System In
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
ment ...........mation ..........
eview ...........
ent Types .
.....................vents ...........
Events .......
.....................hic Incident
dent ..............ate Incident
dent .............
oles and R
ization - No/Public Wor
ent and Publ
.................
ms ................
.................
.....................
.....................
.................
pe .................
.....................
.................
Practice .....S ....................
andbook .....dor Managem
egrated Cor
rated Corrid.....................
ncident Ma
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Responsibi
orth Florida rks Agency .
lic Safety A
.................
......................
.................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................ment Progra
rridor Mana
dor Managem......................
anagemen
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
ilities .......
TPO ...................................
gencies .......
.................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................am ...............
agement ......
ment .................................
nt Process
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
s ...............
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Concept oDynamic D
.................
......................
.................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
of OperationsDetour System
i
............... 1
................... 1
.............. 3
.................. 3
.................. 4
.............. 6
.................. 6
.................. 6
.............. 8
.................. 8
.................. 8
.................. 9
................ 10
................. 12
................. 13
................. 13
............. 14
................ 14
................ 14
................. 15
................. 15
................. 15
................. 15
................. 15
................. 16
................. 16
............. 17
................. 17
................. 17
................. 17
................. 17
................. 17
................. 17
................ 18
................ 18
............. 19
................. 19
................. 19
................. 21
8.
9.
10
11.
12
7.4. Stat7.5. Tran
7.6. Priv7.7. Elec
7.8. Loca
Operat
8.1. Insti
8.1.1. 8.1.2.
8.2. Tech8.2.1.
System
9.1. Devi
9.1.1. 9.1.2.
9.2. Corr
9.3. Cost9.4. Pow
9.5. Devi9.6. Arte
9.6.1.
9.6.2. 9.7. Syst
0. Operat
10.1. Sing
10.2. Mult10.3. Corr
Standa
11.1. Impl
11.2. Resp11.3. Syst
11.4. Deci
11.5. Esca11.6. De-e
11.7. Afte11.8. Publ
. I-95 Ca
12.1. Opti
12.2. Stud
12.3. Esca12.4. De-e
12.5. Afte
te and Localnsit Agency
ate Towing ted Officials
al Media ......
ional and
itutional En
Traffic ManRoad Rang
hnical EnvirExisting IT
m Deploym
ice Conside
Arterial DyArterial Dy
ridor Consid
t Consideratwer Supply C
ice Communerial Signal T
Traffic Sign
Adaptive Ttem Interfac
ional Scen
gle Segment
tiple-Segmeridor Impact
rd Operat
ementation
ponder Orietem and Res
ision Suppo
alation Procescalation P
er Action Relic Informat
ase Study
ons Conside
dy Area .......
alation Procescalation P
er Action Re
l Emergency.....................
Companiess and Comm
.....................
Support E
vironment..
nagement Cger Program
onment ......S Network .
ment ..........
rations .......
ynamic Trailynamic Mess
deration ......
tions ...........Consideratio
nication ConTiming Mod
nal System
Traffic Signace Consider
narios ......
t Impact ......
ent Impact ..t ...................
ting Proce
n Plan Overv
entation andsource Depl
rt System ..
cedure .........Procedure ...
eview ...........ion Campaig
.................
eration ........
.....................
cedure .........Procedure ...
eview ...........
y Operation.....................
....................munity Grou
.....................
Environme
.....................
Center ..........m ....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
lblazer Signsage Signs .
.....................
.....................ons................
nsiderationsification Co
and Capabi
al Control Syrations .........
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
edures ......
view .............
d Coordinatiloyment ......
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................gn ................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
n Center .............................
......................ps ................
......................
ent ............
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
...........................................
......................
......................
......................
s ....................onsideration
lities ............
ystem ................................
.................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
ion ......................................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................ns ..................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Concept oDynamic D
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
.................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
of OperationsDetour System
ii
............... 22
................23
................23
................23
................23
........... 24
............... 24
............... 24
............... 24
............... 25
............... 25
............ 27
................ 27
................ 27
............... 29
................. 31
................. 31
................32
................32
................ 33
................ 33
............... 34
............... 34
............ 35
............... 35
................ 37
............... 39
............. 41
................ 41
................ 41
................ 41
............... 42
............... 43
............... 44
............... 44
............... 44
........... 45
............... 45
............... 45
............... 52
............... 52
............... 52
13
Ap
Ap
Ap
Ap
Ta
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
12.6. Prel12.7. I-29
. Referen
ppendix A:
ppendix B:
ppendix C:
ppendix D:
able of Figu
gure 1. System
gure 2. North
gure 1. FDOT
gure 1. Corrid
gure 2. Summ
gure 3. Overa
gure 4. Stand
gure 5. Existi
gure 6. Arter
gure 7. Arter
gure 8. Arter
gure 9. Arter
gure 10. Singl
gure 11. Multip
gure 12. Corri
gure 13. Syste
gure 14. Decis
gure 15. Dyna
gure 16. Arte
gure 17. Dyna
gure 18. Arte
gure 19. Dyna
gure 20. Arte
gure 21. I-295
iminary Cos5/SR 9A Lo
nces ........
District-2
Sample Me
Public Info
Detailed P
ures
ms Engineeri
h Florida TPO
District 4 Ar
dor Assets Int
mary of Bene
all ICM Benef
dard Operatin
ing ITS Cover
ial Dynamic T
ial Dynamic T
rial DMS ........
ial DMS Conc
le Segment I
ple-Segment
idor Impact -
em and Reso
sion Support
amic Trailblaz
rial DMS Opt
amic Trailblaz
rial DMS Opt
amic Trailblaz
erial DMS Opt
5/SR 9A Alte
st Estimatesoop Alternat
.................
Detour Ma
emorandum
ormation C
Preliminary
ing “V” ..........
O Service Are
rterial DMS ...
tegrated in IC
fit Cost for H
fit under Diffe
ng Processes
rage ...............
Trailblazer S
Trailblazer S
.......................
cept Layout .
mpact - Conc
Impact - Con
- Concept Lay
ource Coordin
System Flow
zer Option: S
ion: Segmen
zer Option: S
ion: Segmen
zer Option: S
tion: Segmen
ernate Route
s and Numbte Route Co
.................
aps
m of Under
ampaign
Cost Estim
.......................
ea Map ...........
.......................
CM .................
High Demand
erent Operat
s ......................
.......................
ign .................
ign Concept
.......................
.......................
cept Layout .
ncept Layout
yout ...............
nation Diagra
w Chart .........
Segment-1, Ph
t-1, Philips H
Segment-2, N
t-2, North o
Segment-3, S
nt-3, South o
e Concept ......
ber of Deviceoncept .........
.................
rstanding
mates
........................
........................
........................
........................
with Major I
tional Condit
........................
........................
........................
Layout ..........
........................
........................
........................
t ......................
........................
am ..................
........................
hilips Highwa
ighway South
North of Race
f Race Track
outh of IGP t
f IGP to Nort
........................
es Used ...........................
.................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
ncident ........
ions ...............
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
ay South to P
h to Philips H
e Track Road
k Road to Phi
to North of R
th of Race Tr
.......................
.....................
.....................
.................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
Philips Highw
Highway Nort
d to Philips H
ilips Highway
Race Track R
rack Road .....
........................
Concept oDynamic D
......................
......................
.................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
way North ......
th ...................
Highway Sout
y South .........
oad ...............
.......................
.......................
of OperationsDetour System
iii
............... 53
............... 53
............ 55
.................... 4
.................... 6
.................... 9
................... 11
.................. 12
.................. 12
.................. 14
................. 26
................. 27
................. 28
................. 29
................. 30
................. 36
................. 38
................. 40
................. 42
................. 43
................. 46
................. 47
th .............. 48
................. 49
................. 50
.................. 51
................. 54
Lis
Ta
Ta
Ta
Ta
Ta
Ta
Ta
st of Tables
ble 1: ITS Com
ble 2: Conge
ble 3: Stakeh
ble 4: List of
ble 5: Corrid
ble 6: System
ble 7: Cost E
s
mmunication
stion Impact
holder Involv
f Advantages
or Informatio
m Cost Table
stimate and
Item OriginReviewReviseReviewReviseVerifieFinal R
n Coverage ...
s of Planned
ement in Eac
s and Disadva
on ...................
e ......................
Number of D
Qu
nator wed By ed By wed By ed By ed By Report Submi
.......................
and Unplann
ch Phase of D
antages of Ar
.......................
.......................
Devices Used
uality Contro
itted on
........................
ned Events....
Dynamic Deto
rterial Trailb
........................
........................
.......................
ol Tracking INameSharmShawSharmBarbarSharmBarbarSharm
.......................
.......................
our System R
lazer and DM
.......................
.......................
.......................
Informatione D
ma 0101
ma 02resso 02
ma 02resso 02
ma 01
........................
........................
Route Planni
MS Concepts .
........................
........................
........................
Date 1/19/2011 1/26/2011 2/03/2011 2/15/2011 2/23/2011 2/25/2011 1/23/2012
Concept oDynamic D
.......................
.......................
ng..................
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
of OperationsDetour System
iv
.................... 7
.................... 9
.................. 19
.................. 31
.................. 31
................. 32
................. 53
1.
Thimdo
Thdifresop
0B0B0B0BIntroduc
e Dynamic plementing dcument will s
- Why: pr
- What: id
- Where:
- Who: id
- When: i
- How: id
e concept oferent resposponsibilitieserations doc
1.1. 13B13B13B13BDef
This sectio
Dynamic Dtraffic in reITS compoinformationoriginal rou
Decision Ssupport res
Integrated Corridor Mcreates an of proactivreceive infalternative example, won that rolocation, tim
Intelligent and wire litransportatimprove sa
ITS Projectacquisition provision o
ITS Architeplanning, dcross-sectitechnology
The
The
Thean i
tion
Detour Systdetours usingserve as a gu
roviding syst
dentifying ex
identifying m
entifying sta
dentifying in
dentifying res
f operationsonding agencs, and proviument will al
finition of S
n provides de
etour Systemeal time baseonent that n to travelersute.
upport Systesponders in m
Corridor Mananagement interconnect
ve multimodormation tha
transportatwhile driving i
ute and be ming and par
Transportatiine communtion system'fety, and enh
t: Accordingof technolo
f one or mor
ecture: Accodefining, and on of the IT
y specialists,
e functions (e
e physical en
e informationintegrated sy
tem (DDS) cg alternate rouideline for e
em justificat
xisting system
major corrido
akeholders an
nstances whe
sources need
s is developecies, understde guidelinelso provide e
tandard Ter
efinition of st
m: This termed on real timcollects reas to help the
em: The decmaking inform
nagement (ICis the coordted system cal managemat encompastion optionsin a future ICinformed of
rking availabi
on System (ications-bases infrastructhance individ
g to the FHWogies or syse ITS user se
rding to the integrating
TS communitconsultants,
e.g., gather tr
tities or subs
n and data flystem.
concept of outes on normergency re
tion, corridor
m componen
ors for the sy
nd their resp
en traffic dive
ded to design
ed to improvand the systes for actioxample oper
rms
tandard term
m was coinedme traffic infal-time traffim make info
cision suppormed, timely, a
CM): Accordindination of incapable of cr
ment of infrasses the ent—even durin
CM corridor, f alternativeility.
ITS): Accorded informatiture, and in dual productiv
WA, an ITS stems of teervices as de
FHWA, the NITS. It is a
ty (transportetc.). The ar
raffic inform
systems whe
ows that con
operations rtheast Floridesponders an
r analysis and
ts and their c
ystem implem
ective respo
ersion activit
n, build, opera
ve safety of tem operatio
ons taken drational scena
ms that are us
d by the Regformation. Aic informatirmed decisio
rt system is and accurate
ng to the Fedndividual netross networkastructure asire transpor
ng a trip—ina traveler co transportat
ing to the FHon and electvehicles thevity.
project is achnologies tfined in the N
National ITS mature protation practirchitecture d
ation or requ
ere these fun
nnect these f
will serve ada’s major rod transporta
d system cap
capabilities
mentation
nsibilities
ties need to b
ate, and main
the respondon and its imuring detouarios.
sed in this do
gional ITS CoA major part
on from thons on select
a knowledge decisions.
deral Highwatwork operatk travel manassets by instation netwo response tould be infortion options
HWA, ITS enctronics tech
emselves, the
ny project tthat provideNational ITS
Architectureoduct that reitioners, systefines:
uest a route)
ctions reside
functions an
as a regionaoadway systeation profess
pability
be performed
ntain the sys
ders, enhancmpact on var
r implement
ocument alon
oalition for tof the dyname road net
ting an altern
ge-based sys
ay Administrations betweeagement. In astitutional pork. They coto changing rmed in adva
such as a
compasses ahnologies. Wese technolo
that in whole or significArchitecture
e provides aeflects the ctems engine
that are req
e (e.g., the fie
d physical su
Concept oDynamic D
al frameworem during incionals on:
d
tem
ce coordinatrious agencietation. This
ng with its so
he concept omic detour sywork and d
nate or conti
stem that is
ation (FHWAen parallel faan ICM corridartners, trav
ould dynamic traffic connce of congenearby tran
a broad rangeWhen integratogies relieve
e, or in parantly contrie.
common fracontributionseers, system
quired for ITS
eld or the veh
ubsystems t
of OperationsDetour System
1
k model oncidents. This
ion betweenes’ roles and
concept of
ource.
of detouringystem is thedisseminatesnuing on the
intended to
), Integratedacilities thatdor, becausevelers couldcally shift tonditions. Forestion aheadnsit facility's
e of wirelessted into thecongestion,
t, funds thebute to the
amework fors of a broad
developers,
S.
hicle).
ogether into
System: Acor more sta
Systems Emeans to efunctionalitsynthesis a
Systems estructured engineeringquality prod
Signal Systmaximum t
Traffic Pacbut not stodiversion. Tminutes tosetting brid
List of Acro
CCTV
DDS
DMS
EOC
EMS
FDOT
FHP
FHWA
ITS
ICM
JSO
JFRD
LED
MUTCD
MOT
TMC
USDOT
ccording to thated purpose
ngineering: enable the rety early in thand system v
engineering idevelopmen
g considers bduct that me
tem: Signal sthroughput.
cing: Accordiop traffic to fTraffic contr
o perform thdge beams, o
onyms
Clos
Dyn
Dyn
Eme
Eme
Flor
Flor
Fede
Inte
Inte
Jack
Jack
Ligh
Man
Main
Traf
Unit
he FHWA, a ses.
According toealization of he developmalidation whi
integrates ant process both the busieets the user
ystem can b
ng to FDOT facilitate shorol officers phe overhead overhead sign
sed Circuit Te
amic Detour
amic Messag
ergency Oper
ergency Medi
ida Departm
ida Highway
eral Highway
lligent Trans
grated Corrid
ksonville She
ksonville Fire
ht Emitting D
nual of Unifor
ntenance of T
ffic Managem
ted States De
system is a c
o the FHWAsuccessful s
ment cycle, dile considerin
ll the discipthat procee
iness and theneeds.
e defined as
Standard Indort duration pace or slow
construction structures,
elevision or t
System
ge Signs
rations Cente
ical Services
ent of Transp
Patrol
y Administrat
sportation Sy
dor Managem
eriff’s Office
e and Rescue
iode
rm Traffic Co
Traffic
ment Center
epartment of
combination
A, systems esystems. It fodocumenting ng the compl
plines and seds from ce technical ne
a group of t
dex 655, trawork operat
w the traffic n. The depaand replacin
traffic camer
er
portation
tion
ystem
ment
e Department
ontrol Device
f Transportat
of interactin
engineering iocuses on derequirementete problem.
specialty groconcept to eeds of all cu
raffic signals
affic pacing itions without
to a speed artment has ng overhead s
ras
t
s
tion
ng elements o
s an interdiefining custots, and then.
oups into a production
ustomers wit
s that are co
s a traffic cot an elaborat
that providefrequently
sign panels.
Concept oDynamic D
organized to
sciplinary apomer needs a proceeding
team efforto operatio
th the goal of
ordinated to
ontrol technte and difficues approximused this te
of OperationsDetour System
2
achieve one
pproach andand required
with design
t forming aon. Systemsf providing a
o achieve the
ique to slowult detour orately 20-30
echnique for
2.
Thforstrneconcontim
Sethesum
In facelebetqu
Thconrolprofieregcouand
1B1B1B1BPurpose
e purpose ofr ITS priorityrategies incleded to supnstruction pnstruction pr
me for drivers
veral significe next five ymmarized be
- I-95 Wi
- I-95 Rig
- I-95 Ov
addition to tcilities to alteement of an atter route deality of life in
is project wngestion scele in definingoject from deld. This concgional transpunty and cityd rescue dep
2.1. 14B14B14B14BSys
The concepthe ITS sysof updatinsynthesizinconsists ofthe “V” consystem verdefinition t
f this project corridors in ude dynamic
pport regionarojects on I-rograms. Thes through con
cant construyears. These elow:
dening and R
gid Pavemen
verland Bridg
these major ernate routeactive facilitiecisions to mn North Florid
ill establish enarios. The g the needs efining and scept of operportation andy public workpartments, an
stems Engin
pt of operatiostem deploymg the regio
ng the desig testing, impnnects the twrification. Tho the system
is to preparthe North Fl
c detouring al mobility g95 and how e ultimate aingested area
ction projectprojects will
Reconstructio
nt Rehabilitat
ge Replaceme
transportatios during trafes managem
minimize theda.
the alternatconcept of oof the projepecifying theations documd public works departmennd emergenc
neering “V”
ons has beenment. The “Vnal ITS archn for the ov
plementationwo sides of “e systems en
m operation a
re an evaluatlorida Transpand travele
goals. Specifuse of ITS am of the pro
as in the nort
ts are planne have a sign
on: Internatio
tion: SR 9A/I
ent: Atlantic
on projects, ffic incidents
ment strategyir travel time
e routes foroperations isect and its oe needs of thment has berks agencies nts, emergeny medical se
n developed t” consists ofhitecture, coverall systemn, operation,“V” by implengineering “V
and maintena
tion and asseportation Plar informatiofically, this and parallel roject is to actheast Florid
ed for the I-9nificant impac
onal Golf Par
-295 to Atla
Boulevard to
the need to and other n
y. These strate, thereby, r
r drivers durs a critical plutcome. Sta
he project toen developesuch as, the
cy operationrvices.
to be consistf two distinctoncept explom, and startand mainten
ementing theV” covers th
ance.
essment of aanning Organon using traiproject will routes can mchieve congea region.
95 corridor ict on region
rkway to SR 9
ntic Bouleva
o Fuller Warr
provide dynon recurringtegies can alreducing air
ring traffic inlanning stagekeholders ar
o integration ed by the Noe Florida De
n centers, reg
tent with thet sides as shooration, devting implemenance of thee system valihe entire proj
ctive facilitynization (TPOilblazers andalso consid
mitigate the rstion mitigat
in the North al traffic and
9A/I-295
ard
ren Bridge
amic detourg forms of colso be used tquality emis
ncidents as e where the re involved aand verificat
orth Florida Tepartment ofgional law en
e FHWA’s sysown in Figureeloping the entation in te overall systidation plan, ject life cycl
Concept oDynamic D
y managemenO) ITS Masterd other techer the effecregional imption and imp
Florida TPOd transporta
ing of trafficongestion is ao inform driv
ssions and im
well as durinstakeholder
at various sttion of the syTPO, in assof Transportanforcement a
stem engineee 1. The left sconcept of
the field. Thtem. The cendevice testie ranging fro
of OperationsDetour System
3
nt strategiesr Plan. Thesehnologies ascts of majoract of theseroved travel
region overtion and are
c from majoran importantvers to makemproving the
ng recurrings play a keytages of theystem in theociation withtion (FDOT),
agencies, fire
ering “V” forside consists
operations,e right side
ntral core ofng plan, andom the need
*Sourc
The FHWA of successdevelopmevalidation w
Systems endevelopmeboth the bumeets the the project
2.2. 15B15B15B15BDoc
The concepthe system
Section 3. in this sect
Section 4. discussed i
Section 5. during detotraveler inf
Section 6. briefly alon
Section 7. discussed i
Section 8. device opeprogram, a
ce: Systems Eng
defines systsful systemsnt cycle, dowhile conside
ngineering innt process thusiness and tuser needs. life cycle.
cument Out
pt of operati will behave
System Overion.
State of Pran this section
Dynamic Detour implemeformation, tra
Event and Ing with the ty
Stakeholden detail in th
Operational erates are dind existing IT
Fi
gineering for Int
tem engineer. It focuses
ocumenting rering the com
ntegrates all hat proceedsthe technicaSystems eng
tline
ons will act and interact
rview: Projec
actice Reviewn.
tour System entation suchaffic manage
ncident Typype of inciden
ers’ Roles ais section as
and Supportscussed in dTS network.
igure 1. Syst
elligent Transpo
ring as an int on definingrequirements
mplete proble
disciplines as from concel needs of al
gineering pro
as a referenwith the end
ct definition
w: Nationwid
Incident Mah as, detectiement, and af
es: In this snts such as, c
and Responss it pertains t
t Environmedetail in this
tems Engine
ortation System
terdisciplinarg customer s, and then em.
and specialtypt to productl customers
ocesses ident
nce documend users. Follo
and scope a
de state of t
nagement Prion, verificatfter action re
section the pcatastrophic
sibilities: Tho their roles
nt: The instis section inc
eering “V”
m, Federal Highw
ry approach needs and proceeding
y groups intotion to operawith the goatify the role
t for the staowing is the s
nd existing s
the practice
rocess: The ttion, notificaeview will be
planned and , major, inter
e stakeholdin dynamic d
itutional andcluding, traff
way Administrat
and means trequired fuwith design
o a team effoation. Systemal of providinof stakehold
akeholders tosectional out
system back
summary on
traffic incideation, respon
discussed br
unplanned ermediate, and
ders’ roles adetour syste
technical enfic managem
Concept oDynamic D
ion
to enable thenctionality e
n synthesis
ort forming ams engineerinng a quality pders as the k
o provide deline of this d
ground will b
n similar pro
ent managemnse, clearancriefly in this s
events will bd minor.
and responsm implement
nvironment iment center,
of OperationsDetour System
4
e realizationearly in theand system
a structuredng considersproduct that
key aspect in
tails on howocument:
be discussed
jects will be
ment processce, recovery,section.
be discussed
sibilities aretation.
in which theroad ranger
Section 9. S
9.1. Dev
9.2. Co
9.3. Co
9.4. Po
9.5. De
9.6. Art
9.7. Sys
Section 10.consideredimpact.
Section 11. system opsystem andaction revie
Section 12Internation
System Depl
vice consider
rridor consid
st considerat
wer supply c
vice commun
terial signal t
stem interfac
. Operationafor detour o
Standard Operation that
d resource deew.
. I-95 Casenal Golf Parkw
oyment: The
rations
derations
tions
consideration
nication cons
timing modif
ce considera
al Scenarios:operation, wh
perating Proct includes imeployment, d
e Study: Thway and Fulle
following ar
ns
siderations
ication consi
tions
This sectiohich includes
cedures: Thismplementatioecision supp
is section oer Warren Br
eas will be di
iderations
on outlines tsingle segme
s section outon plan oveort system, e
outlines the idge.
iscussed in d
the three opent impact, m
tlines the vaerview, respoescalation an
system pla
detail in this s
perational scmultiple segm
arious aspectonder orientnd de-escalat
an for the
Concept oDynamic D
section:
cenarios thatment impact
ts of the dyntation and ction procedu
I-95 segme
of OperationsDetour System
5
t have beenand corridor
namic detourcoordination,re, and after
ent between
3.
2B2B2B2BSystem O
3.1. 16B16B16B16BPro
The scope boundary. which incluNorth Florimillion. IncJacksonvillNassau CouTown of Or
The four mDiversion raccess higCopies of d
3.2. 17B17B17B17BSys
In April 20partnershipand other m
Est
Det
Gui
The study aSt. Johns, aregional ITS
Overview
oject Definit
of the projecThis project
udes all of Duida TPO servcluded withile Beach andunty; St. Augange Park in
major limitedoute maps hhways, exceiversion rout
stem Backg
006, the Norp with the Jamembers of t
ablish the re
termine the s
de the Coalit
area encompas well as neS Master Pla
tion and Sco
ct is limited tis focused
uval County avice area mn the bound
d the Town ofgustine and S Clay County
Figure 2
d access highave been prpt for SR 2te maps for I
round
rth Florida Tacksonville Tthe First Coa
gion's vision
steps needed
tion in coordi
passed four cighboring co
an was compl
ope
to the North on limited aand portions ap. This aredary are thf Baldwin, in St. Augustiney.
2. North Flo
ghways in thepared by th02, which is-95, I-10 and
TPO, then caTransportatiost ITS Coalit
and goals fo
d to achieve t
inating, integ
counties withunties - Alacleted in July
Florida TPO access highw
of Clay, Nasa encompas
he cities of Duval Count
e Beach in St
orida TPO Se
he project rehe FDOT Dists under cons I-295/SR 9A
alled the Firson Authorityion, develope
or intelligent
those goals
grating, and p
hin the Northchua, Baker, , 2010. This
service areaways within tssau and St. sses 1,838 sq
Atlantic Bety; Fernandint. Johns Cou
ervice Area
egion are I-9trict 2 Trafficsideration foA are provide
st Coast Me(JTA), FDOT
ed a Regiona
transportati
prioritizing p
h Florida TPOBradford, Flaupdate inclu
a that falls wthe North FlJohns, Counquare miles each, Neptunna Beach andnty; and Gre
a Map
95, I-10, I-29c Operationsor developmed in Append
etropolitan PT District 2, al ITS Master
ion systems
projects
O boundary - agler, Putnamded a review
Concept oDynamic D
ithin the FDOorida TPO s
nties. Figure and a popu
ne Beach, Jd the Town oen Cove Spr
95/SR 9A as Office for tent of diver
dix A.
Planning Orgathe City of JPlan to:
Clay, Duval, m and Union.w on mileston
of OperationsDetour System
6
OT District 2service area,2 shows thelation of 1.2Jacksonville,f Callahan inings and the
and SR 202.hese limited
rsion routes.
anization, inJacksonville,
Nassau, and. An updatednes achieved
from the timplementa
RevFloconand
Indroaand
Proof ttransys
PrioTheroasecsys
ITSFlo
ITSandloca
This projecoperations
The followifour limited
Other corriarea are lis
- McD
- US
- SR
- SR
- US
- Cen
A detailed darea is prov
ime the origation plans. T
view of Existrida region a
nducted on thd completed I
dividual Systedway in the
d maintaining
ogrammed ITthe projects nsit signal prtems, and a
iority Corridoe priority cordway section
ctions of thetems with no
S Needs and Crida region a
S Maintenancd needs corration: http://
ct builds on tdocument fo
ng table bried access high
Roadw
I-95 I-10 I-295/SRSR 202
dor segmentsted below:
Duff Avenue:
10/Atlantic B
152/Baymea
115/Southsid
17/Roosevel
ntral Busines
discussion onvided in the l
ginal master The updated
ting ITS in thand reviewedhe five year ITS projects.
tems Evaluatregion. This
g agencies of
TS Projects idinclude free
riority, a comregional traf
ors for ITS Drridors for ITns that could
e roadways wo ITS system
Cost Estimatnd the cost e
ce included thridor project/www.northfl
he work comor a dynamic
efly summarihways that ar
way ITCovePartiParti
R 9A PartiNone
ts with existi
: between Be
Boulevard: be
adows Road:
de Boulevard
t Boulevard:
ss District (CB
n existing, prater sections
plan was deRegional ITS
he region, whd it with the plan, which c
tion was persection iden the deploye
dentified proeway and artmmuter servific managem
Deployment idTS deploymed benefit fromwith ITS, ad in place.
tes identifiedestimates for
he forms tha. The ITS moridatpo.com
mpleted as a detour syste
izes the ITS re envisioned
Table 1. ITS C
TS rageal I-295al I-95 tal South
e -
ng ITS comm
eaver Street a
etween Beac
between San
: between SR
between I-2
BD): Downtow
rogrammed, s of this docu
eveloped andS Master Plan
hich identifiestakeholder
classified pre
rformed to tified the ITSd fiber optic
ogrammed ITterial managce program,
ment center.
dentified priont were devem ITS deployditional dep
d ITS corridorr funding of t
at should be maintenance fm/its-form/.
part of the Rem within the
coverage avd to be equip
Communicat
south intercto Chaffee Rohwest Quadra
munication inf
and Rooseve
ch Boulevard
n Jose Boulev
R 202 and Ph
95 and Kings
wn Jacksonv
and ongoingument.
d set new ITn was divided
ed the extents involved wevious ITS m
identify ITS S coverage onetwork in t
TS projects inement systeRoad Range
ority corridoeloped by thyment. Theseloyment alo
rs that wouldthe projects.
completed bform can be
Regional ITS e North Flori
vailable in thpped with dyn
tion Coverage
Limits
change to Duoad ant I-10 to I-9
frastructure
elt Boulevard
and SR A1A
vard and SR
hilips Highwa
sley Avenue
ville CCTVs o
ITS deploym
TS milestoned into the foll
t of ITS deplwith ITS deplmilestones int
elements dof the region he region.
n the northeaems, ITS signer services, r
ors for ITS dehe stakeholdee priority corng ITS corri
d need ITS co
by the stakee filled out a
Master Planda TPO servi
e North Flornamic detour
e
uval County li
95
within the N
d
9A
ay
on State, Unio
ment in the N
Concept oDynamic D
es for five- alowing six pa
oyment in thoyment. Theto programm
deployed on and listed th
ast Florida rnal controlleoad weather
eployment iners on a maprridors includidors, and n
overage in th
holders for eat the follow
n to develop aice area.
rida TPO servr systems:
ine
North Florida
on and Bay S
orth Florida
of OperationsDetour System
7
and ten-yeararts:
he northeaste review was
med, ongoing,
each majorhe operating
egion. Somers, cameras,
r information
n the region.p identifyingde additionalew roadway
he northeast
each prioritywing website
a concept of
vice area on
TPO service
Streets
TPO service
4.
A sdetDeagedu
3B3B3B3BState of
state of the ptouring traff
epartment of ency studiesring incident
4.1. 18B18B18B18BReg
This stratehas prepareupdated evmaps provimaps, no mplan. Thesalternate rEnhancemealternate ro
1. Conto tlaneeas
2. Conwill
3. Conmeewithrou
4. Consele
The currendivert traffincident is knowledge jurisdiction
The FDOT motorists alocal 511 catime.
4.2. 19B19B19B19BFlo
FDOT Distrwith the I-7lane blockadrivers arechoose an intersectiospecial eve16-inch cha
Practice R
practice literfic for traffic
Transportats and unpubls using ICM s
gional Exist
gy is not imped detour ma
very six montide alternate
major concerne detour ma
route corridoent opportunoutes include
nsider establthe stakeholde closure and
sed and the o
nsider option provide som
nsider condueting will proh local authote.
nsider periodecting or mod
nt state of prfic based on
cleared froof the road
nal boundary
District 2 uabout the incalls. However
rida DOT’s
rict 4 install75 and I-95 ages on arte alerted aheaalternate ro
n which mayents such as aracters.
Review
rature reviewc incident mtion (USDOT)ished reportstrategies.
ing State of
plemented fuaps for severths and are se routes basns were noteaps consideors. Also, thnities that we:
ishing a miniders. For exad/or congest
open road pol
ns to guide mme options fo
ucting periodovide an oppoorities and re
dically referrdifying a det
ractice by th information
om the roadway segmeninformation,
ses Dynamicident on the
r, no alternat
Arterial DM
ed 34 artericorridors. Thrial roads asad of time beoute. Like fry serve as anthe Super B
w was conducanagement.) Integrated s chronicle n
f Practice
ully at this timral major higshared with ted on exit n
ed. The mapsred schools,ese detour
would increas
imum and maample, a detotion build up;licy timeline
motorists bacr this.
dic meetingsortunity for tesponders; as
ring to FHWAour route.
he law enforn available away. The in
nt where the information
c Message Sfreeway bein
te route infor
S
ial DMS in Bhese arterials well as on efore approareeway DMSn alternate rowl. These a
cted to underThis concepCorridor Ma
national app
me in the nohways withinthe traffic incnumbers ands are well des, hospitals, routes are sse the suppo
aximum timeour route will; similarly, deis met.
ck to their or
s with localthe lead agens well as prov
A’s “Alterna
cement agent hand durinformation a
e incident ocfrom the TM
Signs (DMS), ng travelled. rmation is di
Broward Counl DMS displafreeways. Th
aching the fre, these arteroute. These rterial DMS
rstand how opt falls underanagement (Iroaches tow
ortheast Florn the Districtcident mana roadway sesigned to setraffic signa
set for perioort from loc
elines of detol be implemeetour activity
riginal path.
stakeholdersncy to establvide feedbac
te Route Ha
ncies and otng traffic inct hand inclu
ccurred, instMC, local 511,
where availThe incident
isseminated
nty, Florida y incident inhe advantageeway systerial DMS aresigns are al
are smaller p
other states hr the categoICM) ITS pro
wards managi
ida region. Ht 2 boundarygement team
egments. Aftrve the purpals, police sodic review al authoritie
our activitiesented after sy should be l
This concep
s specificallylish communck or critique
andbook” for
her traffic incident, or bludes the phitutional knoetc.
lable, to disst informationthrough any
along arterianformation toge of these aem, which wile installed ilso used for profile signs
Concept oDynamic D
handle similaory of the Unogram. Publising and oper
However, FDOy. These detom in CD formter reviewingpose of a dynstations, etcand renewal
es on wide u
s that are copecified timelifted when c
t of operatio
y for detourication and r
e on the choi
r any update
ncident respock traffic fysical and g
owledge and
seminate infn is also disse of these sou
al corridors o let drivers arterial DMS l allow sufficn advance omessage powith two lin
of OperationsDetour System
8
ar concept ofnited Statedshed papers,rating traffic
OT District 2our maps are. The detour
g the detournamic detour. within thel as needed.use of these
mmunicatede duration ofcongestion is
on document
r maps. Thisrelationshipsce of detour
es or before
onders is toflow until angeographical
experience,
formation toeminated viaurces at this
intersectingknow aboutsigns is the
cient time toof the majorosting duringes of twelve
4.3. 20B20B20B20BFHW
In May 200and how trathe alternausing an altraffic flow
E
Pla
nn
ed
Eve
nt
Mm
P
Un
pla
nn
ed
Eve
nt
Ts
E
Ar
Ed
WA’s Altern
06 FHWA pubaffic and hig
ate route withternate routare provided
Event Type
Major roadwamaintenance
Planned spec
Traffic incidenpilled load, d
Emergency ro
Adverse weatain, sun glare
Emergency (edisaster, hum
Figu
*Source
nate Route H
blished an Alhway agencih the stakehe. The scenad in Table 2 b
Table 2: Con
ay constructio
ial events
nt (e.g., crasdebris)
oad work
ther (e.g., snoe)
e.g., severe wman-caused in
ure 1. FDOT
e: FDOT SunGuid
Handbook
lternate Roues can impleolders that p
arios when thbelow:
ngestion Impa
on and
h, disableme
ow, ice, fog, h
weather, natuncident)
District 4 A
de Disseminator
te Handbookement them. participate ohe alternate
acts of Plann
Eff
-
-
-
nt, -
-
heavy -
ural -
Arterial DMS
k that descriThis handbo
or get involveroutes can b
ned and Unpl
fect on Road
Closes trav
Creates sidspeed and c
Closes travto stage evevents).
Blocks trav
Blocks trav
Reduces veincreases hcapacity.
Renders ro(potentially
S
bes what altook describesed in the probe implement
anned Event
Capacity
vel lane(s) or
de friction, recapacity.
vel lane(s) or vent (typically
vel lane(s) or
vel lane(s) or
ehicle operatheadways, th
ad segmentsy).
Concept oDynamic D
ernate traffis the need foocess of detoted and their
ts
road segmen
educing traffi
road segmeny street use
road segmen
road segmen
ing speeds aus reducing
s impassable
of OperationsDetour System
9
c routes areor discussingouring trafficr impacts on
nts.
ic
nts
nts.
nts.
nd
This handb
1. Alte
2. Alteincl
3. Traimptraf
The alternaconsidered
- Pro
- Eas
- Saf
- Hei
- Num
- Con
- Tra
- Num
- Tra
- Pav
- Typ
- Exis
- Per
- Gra
- Typ
- Ava
- Noi
- Tra
- Air
- Abi
- Ow
- Ava
- Ava
The alternadefining the
4.4. 21B21B21B21BUS
The USDOTManagemetransportat
1. Dal
2. Hou
3. Min
4. Mon
ook categori
ernate route
ernate routeluding inform
affic manageplementationffic to, from a
ate route ha when optimi
oximity of alt
se of access t
fety of motor
ght, weight,
mber of trave
ngestion indu
affic condition
mber of signa
avel time on a
vement and b
pe and intens
stence of sch
rcentage of h
ades on alter
pe and intens
ailability of fu
se pollution
ansit bus acco
quality
lity to contro
nership of ro
ailability of IT
ailability of IT
ate route hae roles of diff
DOT’s Integ
T had selectent (ICM) stration. The eigh
las, Texas (U
uston, Texas
nneapolis, Min
ntgomery Co
zes the alter
selection: ch
plan develomation on alte
ement planni and for traand on the al
andbook highizing the list
ernate route
to/from alter
rists on alter
width, and tu
el lanes/capa
uced on alter
ns on alterna
alized interse
alternate rou
bridge condit
sity of reside
hools and hos
heavy vehicle
nate route
sity of comme
uel, rest stop
ommodation
ol timing of t
oad
TS surveillan
TS informatio
ndbook is a ferent stakeh
grated Corri
ed eight “Piotegy deploymht pioneer IC
US 75)
(I-10 and US
nnesota (I-39
ounty, Maryla
rnate route p
hoosing an op
pment: deveernate route
ing: planningaffic control, lternate rout
hlights the fof candidate
e to closed ro
rnate route
nate route
urning restric
acity of alter
rnate route
ate routes
ections, stop
ute
tions on alter
ntial develop
spitals on alt
es (e.g., truck
ercial develo
ps, and food f
raffic signals
ce equipmen
on dissemina
useful tool tholders durin
dor Manage
neer Sites” ament and tes
CM sites are l
290)
94)
and (I-270)
planning phas
ptimal altern
loping informimplementat
g for informincluding ca
te.
following liste corridors:
oadway
ctions on alte
nate route
signs, and u
rnate route
pment on alte
ternate route
ks, buses. RV
opment on alt
facilities alon
s on alternate
nt on alternat
ation equipme
to help narrong the alterna
ement Prog
across the costing in co-opisted below:
ses into the f
nate route fro
mation to inction.
mation to beapacity enha
t of criteria
ernate routes
unprotected l
ernate route
e
Vs) on route f
ternate route
ng alternate
e route
te route
ent on altern
ow down the ate route sel
ram
ountry to actperation with
following thre
om the list of
corporate in
e disseminatancements n
for alternat
s
eft turns on
from which tr
e
routes
nate route
alternate rolection proce
t as test siteh the respect
Concept oDynamic D
ee steps:
f candidate r
the alternate
ted to motoneeded to ac
te route sele
alternate rou
raffic is to be
oute selectioesses.
s for Integraive state dep
of OperationsDetour System
10
outes.
e route plan,
orists duringccommodate
ection to be
ute
e diverted
on as well as
ted Corridorpartments of
5. Oak
6. San
7. San
8. Sea
These sitesmany otheexample, rebelow show
The USDOTdemonstratresults fromprogram inmodeling:
1. Tra
2. Tra
3. Inci
4. Fue
5. Cor
The benefit
kland, Califor
n Antonio, Te
n Diego, Calif
attle, Washin
s were selecer corridors eal time signws the existin
T ICM progrtion and evam San Diego,n fiscal year
avel time
avel delay tim
ident duratio
el consumptio
rridor capacit
t-cost analys
rnia (I-880)
exas (I-10)
fornia (I-15)
gton (I-5)
cted based oacross the al control, h
ng infrastruct
Figure
ram is underaluation at th, CA, Dallas, 2009 to 20
me and predic
on and freque
on and pollut
ty utilization
sis for high de
on USDOT’s nation and aigh occupancture assets in
e 1. Corridor
rway and is he selected TX, and Minn
010. The follo
ctability
ency
tion reductio
(vehicle and
emand major
belief that tall possess cy vehicle anntegrated in
r Assets Int
in its thirdpioneer site
neapolis, MNowing corrido
n
d traveler thr
r incidents is
they contain infrastructur
nd value pricICM.
egrated in I
d and final ses. The analy
were compleor performan
roughput)
shown in Fig
the charactre assets thing, bus rapi
ICM
stage (fiscal ysis, modelineted as a parnce measure
gure 2.
Concept oDynamic D
teristics thathat can enabd transit, etc
year 2010 ng and simulrt of second es were used
of OperationsDetour System
11
t representsble ICM. Forc. The figure
to 2012) oflation (AMS)stage of the
d to conduct
The numbepositive foinformationduring highunder diffe
The dollar there is a lagreater the
4.5. 22B22B22B22BMin
This projeccities of Blproject waperpendicuseveral ITStraffic survaugment frareas:
Figure 2.
ers on the bar the high dn, transit trah demand anrent operatio
Figure 3
amount in tharge amounte benefit.
nnesota DOT
t was starteoomington, Rs implementlar arterial s
S technologieveillance. Thereeway capa
Summary o
rs representdemand and aveler informd major incidonal scenario
3. Overall IC
he figure rep of cost savi
T’s I-494 In
d in 1994 byRichfield, andted on an 8streets crosss including a
ese deployedacity during
of Benefit C
t the benefitsmajor incid
mation and sdent type of os.
CM Benefit u
presents costng per incide
tegrated Co
forging a pad Edina to te
8-mile segmesing five jurisadaptive ram technologiemajor incide
ost for High
s to cost ratient type sceignal coordinscenario. Th
under Differ
t savings dueent type. The
orridor Man
artnership beest the concent of I-494sdictional boup metering, as were used ents. Severa
h Demand w
io after ICM enario. The nation resulthe following
rent Operat
e to ICM impe greater traf
nagement
etween Minnecept of ICM a4 encompassundaries. Thadaptive trafto better lev
al benefits w
with Major In
implementatfigure showt in a positivfigure shows
tional Condi
plementationffic demand a
esota DOT, Hacross jurisdsing four paris project invffic signals, mverage the pwere identifie
Concept oDynamic D
ncident
tion. All the ns that highwve return ofs the overall
tions
n. Figure 3 inand incident
Hennepin Couictional bounrallel streetsvolved the a
motorist inforarallel streeted in the fo
of OperationsDetour System
12
numbers areway travelerf investment ICM benefit
ndicates thatseverity the
unty and thendaries. Thiss and sevenpplication ofrmation, andt capacity to
ollowing four
1. Instcooare
2. Sysandshifcomfunlimi
3. Sysdepper
4. Sysimpin cand
4.6. 23B23B23B23BMic
The Michigbetween MstakeholdeSoutheast Michigan Sjurisdictioncorridors fconstant troutcomes itowards a manageme
4.7. 24B24B24B24BSim
Several simtransportatalternate ro
The fist simindicated tcongestionto 56 percfor Advanctime for bemodel to cseverity, lopreviously medium levwas hardernetwork de
The secondmodel resusystems caindicated tstudy is a pAn analysisstrategies. calculated ICM applied
titutional beoperation anda.
stem performd resources fft on adaptimmunication ction as desitation can b
stem deploymployment chrtaining to int
stem impactsproved trafficcongested cod integrated i
chigan DOT’
gan DOT impM-102 and Bars, includingMichigan Co
State Policens. This projefor incident raffic flow ts still pendincommon gont and opera
mulation Stu
mulation stution system. outes during
mulation stuhat using a in the Disne
ent. This simed Road Teleefore and afcalculate basow, medium, defined typi
vels of saturar to balance
emand was ve
d simulation ults indicatedan help balahat the benepart of USDOs frameworkThat framewa 10-year be
d during high
enefits: this d coordinatio
mance: this pfor enhancedve signal conetwork at
sired. Howeve overcome.
ment: the proallenges. Thtegrated inte
s: the overac operation aorridors. Thisinter-jurisdic
’s I-75 Integ
plemented anldwin Road. T the Road Council of Go, City of A
ect forged paand non-inchroughout t
ng. However,oal of integraation.
udies
udies have Two such stincident sce
dy was conddecision sup
eyland area cmulation studematics) simter impleme
seline saturaand high. A cal traffic acation than lo when the nery small.
study was cod that the ICMance traffic efit to cost rOT’s “Pioneek was develowork is calle
enefit of appr demand maj
project synon; and contr
project provid traffic manontrol among that time, ver, with all
oject technolhis formed aer-jurisdiction
ll system imand use of uns project als
ctional traffic
grated Corri
n ICM projecThis project Commission overnments, uburn Hills,
artnerships bident condithe corridor. it has alreadating arteria
been condutudies requirenarios.
ducted in Anpport tool tocould reduce dy used the ulation modentation scen
ation flow rasymbolic pa
ctivity in theow and high lnetwork dem
onducted in M strategies
flow and eatio of the inr Sites” for ped to evalu
ed the Analyroximately $jor incident s
nergized theributed to en
ided the staagement andg the stakesome of th
l the techno
ogy deployma base of snal applicatio
mpact due tonderutilized so forged pac managemen
idor Manage
ct to optimiwas led by thfor Oakland Suburban MCity of Tr
between thestions. The pu
This projecdy forged a sal and freew
ucted to anre special me
naheim, Califoo select altetravel time Dynasmart (el to measurenarios. Actuates of the cttern was us
e network. Thevels of satu
mand was clo
San Franciscpromoting in
enhance corrntegrated stICM implemeuate the potesis, Modeling570 million
scenarios.
e institutionanhancing the
keholders wd operationsholders. Wite adaptive
ological brea
ment spannedstrong lessoon of differen
o deployed teroadways wirtnerships a
nt strategies
ement
ze capacity he Michigan County, Ro
Mobility Autroy, local pose jurisdictiourpose of th
ct is still unstrong inter-
way capacitie
nalyze the bention due to
ornia in 200ernate trafficby 2 to 29 p(Dynamic Nee average an
al traffic coucorridor and sed to matchhe simulationuration. The ose to satura
co, Californiantegration amridor perfortrategies ranentation on aential impacg, and Simulwith approxi
al and orgaoverall trans
ith valuable s. It also paveth some chasignal contr
akthroughs i
d a five year ns learned nt ITS techno
echnologies ithin the reg
across inter-j.
of over 25 DOT in colla
oad Commisshority for Rolice departons to integrhe project wderway and -jurisdictionaes for better
benefits of o their findin
01 by USDOTc control plapercent and detwork Assignd total netwunt data was
rank them h the currentn results wereason is thation, and h
a, in 2009 bymong freewamance. Also
nges from 7:1a 34-mile segct of indepenation framewimately half
Concept oDynamic D
nizational resportation sy
infrastructued a way for
allenges in trol technologin the recen
period and faand deploym
ologies.
on this projion to augmjurisdictiona
mile long I-boration withsion of MacoRegional Traments, andate freeway
was to creatthe analysi
al partnershipr transporta
ICM strateggs related to
T. The simulaans during nodecrease stonment Simu
work travel tis input in theinto three ct network core most effee demand/caad limited e
y USDOT. Thays, arterialso, the simul1 to 25:1. Thigment of I-8
ndent and cowork. Overalof that attrib
of OperationsDetour System
13
elationships,ystem in the
ure elementsr a paradigmthe unstablegies did notnt past, this
aced severalment advice
ect includesent capacityl boundaries
-75 corridorh many localomb County,ansportation,
other localand arterial
te a steady,s of projectp that workstion system
gies on theo benefits of
ation resultson-recurringp time by 15lation Modelme and stope simulationategories of
ondition withective duringapacity ratioeffects when
e simulations, and transitation modelis simulation
880 corridor.ombined ICMl, the modelbuted to the
5.
ThimproverEaim
4B4B4B4BDynamic
e traffic inplementationocess implemrification, noch of theseplementation
5.1. 25B25B25B25BDet
The detectresponse athat ultimaand cameraThese devicdown or csurveillanceTMC operat
5.2. 26B26B26B26BVer
Once the cverificationRoad Rangnext step tfor the incithe respons
There are t
1. Loc
c Detour S
ncident mann. Dynamic dmentation of otification, ree elements n. Figure 4 ou
tection
ion process agencies. Thetely leads toas that provces are used
congestion me. There are tors, for exam
rification
congestion in process eiters in the vico respond todent. Detailese activity.
two types of
cation verific
ystem Inc
nagement pdetour system
detour activesponse, travis describedutlines the p
Figu
is the first se first sympto delay on thvide continuo to determin
may be alertseveral othe
mple, phone
incident is dher by crosscinity. The tro incidents. Ted incident in
incident veri
cation — inv
cident Man
process desm managemevities. The prveler informad in the forocess order
re 4. Standa
step in identtom is the tre original ro
ous real-timee delay and tted to the er ways in wcalls from tr
detected by s verifying inravel time anThe verificatinformation v
fications:
volves identif
nagement
cribes the ent is similarrocess is desation, trafficllowing sect
r.
ard Operati
ifying the prraffic slowdoute. On majoe traffic infotravel-time oTMC operathich traffic caveling publi
the TMC opnformation und delay infoion process i
verification w
fying the ge
Process
user orienr to traffic inscribed by thmanagemen
tions geared
ng Processe
roblem locatown on the ror roadways,ormation andon the originators automatcongestion aic, patrolling
perators, thsing camera
ormation shois a vital step
would allow re
eographic an
nted processcident manahe similar ei
nt, recovery, d towards d
es
ion that reqroadway, foll FDOT has in
d video feedsal and detoutically or th
and incidentsofficer, Road
ey should im feeds or usuld also be vp in initiatingesponse age
nd physical
Concept oDynamic D
s for dynagement in opght elementsand after ac
dynamic det
uires attentiowed by the
nstalled traffs to the TMCr routes. Thehrough regus can be deted Rangers, m
mmediately ing patrollingverified to prg a proper reencies to be p
location of
of OperationsDetour System
14
amic detourperation ands: detection,ction review.tour system
ion from thee congestionfic detectorsC operators.e traffic slowlar roadwayected by the
media, etc.
switch to ag officers orroceed on toesponse planprepared for
the incident
(ma
2. Incidela
5.3. 27B27B27B27BNot
The notificverifying agdetour actiabout the inagency typto the resmaintenancquick respo
5.4. 28B28B28B28BRes
Transportaagencies refor the localternate trrespond foit is their replan shoulddetour. Detunder the r
As a part osuch a wayoriginal patactivated bproper ageroute shoul
5.5. 29B29B29B29BCle
The clearandetour liftireturning rof any hindThe detouroriginal rou
5.6. 30B30B30B30BRec
The recovethe recovertime when reduction inIn additiondetour opecooperationinclude re-owork. If theperformingdamaged roor transpor
5.7. 31B31B31B31BTra
Traffic manroutes. A pproblem armessages s
ainline, ramp
ident detail vay and asses
tification
cation procegency shouldivities. Congencident with ically dependsponsible agce responsibonse.
sponse
tion agencieesponsible focal agencies raffic signal r assistance esponsibility d consider thtour plans caresponse per
f the responsy that it proth with less dbased on the ency memorald be implem
earance
nce process ng process. oadway cond
drance to nor route advisute is started
covery
ery process bry process incongestion sn delays, the, the traffic eration is a n is desired opening trave damage to repair woroadway fromrtation office
affic Manage
nagement is fpre-planned rea on an ashould be pr
, intersection
verification —ssing the seg
ss is similard pull out theestion incidethe details c
ds on the extgencies depility. An early
es and local or the roadwa
that operatplan for detoupon the lawto assess an
he current pan be implemsonnel guida
se activity anovides motordelay and tratravel time a
andum of undented at this
is essentiallyHowever, it
ditions to norrmal traffic
sory should cd.
begins immedncludes estimstarts to easen the detour
signal planscombined eto avoid an
vel lanes to tthe roadway
k during nom the travellie personnel.
ement
facilitated bydetour routlternate rourovided well
n), direction o
— involves idment impact
r to the trae contact list ent notificatiocollected in thtent of congepends on thy and proact
public worksay to implemte and maintour activitiesw enforcemend solicit reqphysical and mented by ma
nce where si
nd dependingrists an altevel time. A d
and delay infderstanding s time to acco
y a traffic incis an impor
rmal. The maflow and opecontinue to d
diately after tmating delay
e on the freer operation s should reve
effort betweeny further dehe motoristsy is major ann-peak traveng public. Th
y providing tie, where avte leading bin advance
of travel, nea
dentifying theted.
affic incidentof the respo
on is the prohe detection estion and dehe jurisdictiive notificati
s departmenent the detotain the tra
s. Depending ent agency’suired resourctraffic condi
anually turninigns are unav
g on congestrnate route
decision shouormation colis in place, tommodate a
cident managtant process
ain objective en travel landisplay durin
the clearancand travel tieway. If therhould be lifteert back to ten different elay. For tras as well as pnd requires lel, preferablhe recovery w
imely traveleailable, shouback to theof the diver
arest mile ma
e reason for
t managemeonse agenciesocess of info and verifica
elay experienonal boundaion to all the
nts should coour plan for thffic signalson the naturrequest. Oncces to implemition of the ng on the devailable.
tion severity to get arou
uld be made allected fromthe alternatedditional dem
gement procs which incoof the cleares to the tra
ng this proce
e activity is me from the
re is a signified and all thethe normal t
jurisdictionaffic incidentperforming slane closure ly during nigwork is most
er informatiould be imple
original roursion point u
arkers, etc.
congestion,
ent notificatis that would
orming the prtion process
nced by the mary and ro
e responding
oordinate wihe segment oin the regiore of congestce the respoment detour detour routetour signs w
the detour sund the congat this point the original a
e traffic signmand due to
cess and has orporates all ance processaveling publi
ess until the
completed. Fe inception ofcant improvee detour signtime of day s, hence efft managemeshoulder clea
for a longerght time, aftly done by l
on and providmented to d
ute. In ordersing dynami
Concept oDynamic D
determining
ion process be needed t
roper respones. The need
motorist. Theadway operagencies is t
ith the law eof impact. It
on to make tion, other anding agencyoperation. T
e before impwith flashing m
should be impgestion and if the detourand detoured
nal timing fodetour activ
a passive imactivities th
s is to clear tc as quickly recovery pro
For the detouf detour operement in travns should be operation. Tficient coordnt, the reco
an up and dar duration, thfter safely saw enforcem
ding acceptabdivert trafficr to do this,ic massage s
of OperationsDetour System
15
g travel time
in that theo implement
nse agenciesd to notify ane notificationrational andthe key for a
enforcementis importantavailable angencies mayy is notified,
The responseplementing amessages or
plemented inback to the
r needs to bed routes. If ar the detourity.
mpact on thehat facilitatethe roadwayas possible.
ocess of the
ur operation,ration to thevel time anddeactivated.
This stage ofdination andvery efforts
amage repairhen considersecuring thement officers
ble alternatec away from, the detoursigns, where
available aTraffic conwarning sig
Detour mainformationduring emehandling adaspect of tfor the detin such a w
5.8. 32B32B32B32BTra
Traveler inapproachinand up to tfreeway. TRespondersthe traffic messages sthrough the
Traveler incomparisonshould be Whenever athe travelinthose cases
5.9. 33B33B33B33BAft
It is importdetour opeimprove codiscuss traroute(s) fobenefit of tany sugges
nd by using trol devices
gns, etc. shou
ps should ben disseminatergencies shdditional traftraffic managour activity tay that the d
aveler Inform
formation is g the problethe minute t
Timely traves can be assmanagemen
signs, dyname traffic man
formation shns between oused at the
a reduction ing public. Ths, use of stat
ter Action R
tant for eachration. This p
oordination aaffic incidentr any changethe after actstions and fee
simple messuch as dyn
uld be utilized
e made avaiion. Where t
hould study ffic volume, agement durinto accommo
detoured traf
mation
the processem areas. Thi
ravel time inler informat
signed along nt center to
mic message sagement cen
hould be up-toriginal and e problem lon travel time
he availabilitytic signs with
Review
h agency to pplatform shond cooperatit managemees and to retion review pedback that m
sage or thronamic messad to forewarn
lable to the he detour mthe detour
and coordinang the detoudate additionffic is given p
of notifyingis is an activnformation ttion could hthe detour rdisseminate
signs, 511 andnter when ac
to-date and sdetour routeocation to ge on the origy of dynamic
h flashers, 511
participate inuld be used fion for futurent. This mee
eview standaprocess is tomay be recei
ough signs oage signs, pon drivers of t
general pubaps are not route before
ate with the lr process is nal traffic in priority to red
the travelinve process ofo aid them i
help reduce roadway wit traveler infd local mediativated durin
should displae. For this pugenerate upginal route occ message si1, or local rad
n the after acfor open disce incidents. Neting can alsrd operating facilitate opived.
or simple haortable changthe congestio
blic through available, thehand to enlocal traffic opreparing athe region. T
duce stop tim
ng public of tf detour actin making antraffic cong
hout ITS covformation toa. Emergencyng emergenc
ay accurate,urpose, the idates on trccurs, the infigns may be dio stations s
ction review cussion and sNortheast Flso be used tg procedurespen dialogue
nd gestures geable messon well in adv
a website oe agency im
nsure that thoperations on alternate tThe signal timmes and dela
he roadway vity, which p
n en-route degestion on verage to feeo the public y operation cies.
timely informin-field respoaffic incidenformation shlimited to o
should be uti
process to psharing resporida responto discuss os for successe among the
Concept oDynamic D
by on-scenesage signs, trvance of the
r other meaplementing dhe facility is
office. Anothetraffic signalming should y.
conditions inprovides drivecision to dethe impacteed traffic infvia portablecenters perfo
mation aboutonder or trafnts for travehould be dissonly certain rlized.
provide feedbonders’ point
nders meet br re-address
sful implemeresponders
of OperationsDetour System
16
e personnel.raffic cones,exit.
ans of publicdetour planss capable ofer importantl timing planbe designed
n advance ofvers a timelyetour off theed roadway.formation to changeableorm this role
t travel timeffic cameraseling public.
seminated toroadways. In
back on pastts of view to
bi-monthly tos the detourntation. Theand address
6.
Thand
5B5B5B5BEvent an
is section ded incident ty
6.1. 34B34B34B34BEve
Two differeFollowing a
6.1.1.
Plann
-
-
Theseon ththe ev
6.1.2.
Unpla
-
-
-
-
Thesethe in
6.2. 35B35B35B35BInc
Four differNortheast The incidenmajor incidactivation d
6.2.1.
Catasduratfrom Homeroute
-
-
-
-
-
6.2.2
Majorcoordincidenatur
nd Incident
escribes diffepes.
ent Types
ent types ofare the descr
71B71B71B71BPlanned
ned events in
Major road
Planned s
e planned eve extent of event duration
. 72B72B72B72BUnplan
anned events
Traffic inc
Emergenc
Adverse w
Emergenc
e unplanned ncident and m
ident Types
ent traffic inFlorida regiont types thadents that rudepending on
. 73B73B73B73B28BCatastr
strophic incidtion typically
agencies sueland Securite activation. C
Major brid
Wildfire-re
Weather-r
Crashes th
Acts of te
2. 74B74B74B74B29BMajor In
r incidents dination betwents and typire would requ
t Types
erent events
incidents aiptions of the
d Events
nclude, but ar
dway constru
pecial events
vents need grevent impact n.
ned Events
s include, but
cidents
cy road work
weather
cies
events requmay or may n
s
ncident typeon as describt may trigge
un over 90 mn the incident
rophic Incid
dents are nay ranging fromuch as the Sty, HAZMAT Catastrophic
dge damage
elated closur
related closu
hat have a si
rrorism or va
ncident
have an exween differenically requireuire alternate
and incident
re identifiedese events.
re not limited
uction and m
s
reater coordon traffic, w
t are not limit
uire spontanenot require in
s have beenbed below. Eaer implementminutes. Intet.
ent
tural or manm 12 hours tState Warnincontractors,
c incidents m
res
res such as m
gnificant env
andalism
xpected durant agencies ie setting up ae route activ
s when dyna
, which may
d to:
maintenance
ination beforwhich may or
ted to:
eous coordinnitiating the d
identified foach of thesetation of an
ermediate inc
n-made disaso several dang Point, Flo, and others.ay be caused
major storm
vironmental i
ation ranginincluding feda complete tration. Major
mic detours
y or may not
rehand, essemay not req
nation betwedetour plan d
or the trafficincident typalternate ro
cidents may
sters that incays. Catastroorida Depart. Incidents ofd by, but not
or hurricane
impact, such
g from 90 deral agencieraffic incidenincidents ma
may be impl
t require alt
ntially inter-quire initiatin
een differentdepending on
c incident mpes triggers doute or deto
y or may not
clude lane cloophic incidenttment of Enf this naturelimited to:
e
h as a signific
minutes toes. Major incnt managemeay be caused
Concept oDynamic D
emented bas
ternate route
-jurisdictionag a detour pl
agencies ton the event d
management different resour are catast require alte
osures with ts may requi
nvironmentale would requi
cant HAZMAT
o 12 hours cidents are loent area. Incid by, but not l
of OperationsDetour System
17
sed on event
e activation.
al, dependinglan based on
o respond touration.
scenarios inponse plans.strophic andernate route
an extendedire attention Protection,ire alternate
T spill
and requireong-durationdents of thislimited to:
-
-
-
-
6.2.3
Intermalternwhichsettinlimite
-
-
-
-
-
6.2.4
Minoroccurthe incoord
-
-
-
Chain-rea
Severe inj
Environme
Weather-r
3. 75B75B75B75B30BInterme
mediate incidnate route ah sets a goang up a propeed to:
Major road
Overturne
Non-rollov
Rollover a
Commerci
4. 76B76B76B76B31BMinor In
r incidents irring incidentncident scendination betw
Minor pro
Disabled v
Roadway
ction crashe
jury and/or fa
ent-related c
related closu
ediate Incid
dents have activation. Thl of clearing
er traffic inci
dway debris
ed vehicles
ver multiple v
and/or multi-
ial carrier cra
ncident
nvolve event type. Typice and assist
ween respond
perty damag
vehicle
debris
s
atal crashes
crashes such
res such as f
ent
an expected he upper timg all incidentdent manage
vehicle crash
vehicle crash
ashes
nts with duraally, only Rovictims in c
ding agencies
ge
as a fuel spi
fog or major
duration beme limit confo
s within 90 ement area.
hes
hes
ation less thad Rangers olearing the is. Minor incid
ll
storm
tween 30 anorms to the minutes. Int
Intermediate
han 30 minuor a law enfoncident scen
dents may be
nd 90 minutState of Flo
termediate ie incidents m
utes. They aorcement offine. These ince caused by, b
Concept oDynamic D
es that mayorida’s open ncidents usu
may be caused
are the mosicer on patrocidents requibut not limite
of OperationsDetour System
18
y not requireroad policy,
ually required by, but not
t commonlyol respond toire minimumed to:
7.
Thsysreg
PTrCoLaFiEmStTrAPElCM
*
6B6B6B6BStakehol
is section oustem developgion and thei
Tab
lanning orgaransportatioounty and Ciaw enforcemire departmemergency metate emergenransit agencyuthority) rivate towinglected officiaitizens Advis
Media * Source: Modifie
7.1. 36B36B36B36BPla
The North different sjurisdictionrelationshiproute criteorganizatioassure all inthe focus oregion.
The planninwhich may provides thmay be useprovided in
7.2. 37B37B37B37BTra
The FDOT (TMC) operqualified pinformationincidents atraffic camRoad RangRangers casuch as, trconstantly the originadecision an
The FDOT implementienforcemenpublic work
lders’ Role
utlines the ropment. The fir involvemen
le 3. Stakeho
Stakeh
nization (Norn/public worty)
ment (FHP, JSent edical servicncy operatioy (Jacksonvi
g companies als sory Committ
ed from Alterna
anning Orga
Florida TPOtakeholders.
n) and help ps with the eria or may on should panvolved agenof detour rou
ng agency mnot be avai
he informatioeful in determ Appendix B.
ansportation
District 2 Trrating 24 ho
personnel, wn using dynnd delay. Hoeras, radar d
ger program,an assist resaffic cones, monitor con
al route and nd provide tim
Maintenanceing alternatent officers inks departmen
es and Re
oles and respfollowing tabnt in each ph
older Involve
holder
rth Florida TPks agency (F
SO, etc.)
e ns center lle Transport
tee
te Route Handb
nization - N
O may act a. They can
establish tlocal agencidefer it to
rticipate in tncies sign offute planning
may also provilable with o
on about majmining the fea.
n/Public Wo
raffic Engineours a day, s
who help in amic messa
owever, not adetectors, etc, which is a ponders in immessage bogestion on thdetour rout
mely informa
e Office ande signal plan setting up nt supply nec
sponsibilit
ponsibilities le provides tase of the dy
ment in Each
PO) FDOT,
tation
book
orth Florida
as a lead staapply the khe inter-juries. They cantransportati
the stakeholdf on the selecshould be to
vide access tther agencieor roadway iasibility of an
orks Agency
ering and Opseven days managing t
age signs anall roadways c. to monitor
free motormplementingoards, etc. Thhe freeway ae. They shoution to moto
d county andns, propertylane closure
cessary traff
ties
of the regionthe list of staynamic detou
h Phase of Dy
Detour Route
SelectionYes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Yes No Yes Yes No
a TPO
akeholder tonowledge abisdictional an facilitate sion or publicder meetingscted plan of o relieve traf
to resourceses to use in in the regionn alternate r
y
perations Offa week. Thetraffic incidend using trawithin the n
r traffic congist assistanc
g detours andhe goal of thnd local roaduld help imprists.
d local publicy damage rees and manaic control de
nal stakeholdakeholders aur system for
ynamic Deto
DetourRoute Pl
DevelopmYes
YesYesYesYesNo
No No No No No
o establish mbout the regagreement estakeholder c works ages, sign off oaction. The Nffic congesti
s, such as thedeveloping and informa
route. A samp
fice consistse TMCs are oents as welaffic cameraortheast Flo
gestion and ince program d diversions he transportds, and to complement the
c works depepairs, as wging detours
evices such a
ders involvedas it applies tr alternate ro
ur System R
r lan
ment
TraManag
PlanN
YYNNN
YNNNN
mutual agencgion as a wefficiently lemeetings to
encies. In ein the selecteNorth Floridaon, travel tim
e GIS databadetour route
ation on priople memoran
s of two trafoperated by ll as dissemas to monitorida region hncidents. Thion FDOT opusing variouation and pumpare traveldetour route
partments plwell as provs. The FDOT as traffic con
Concept oDynamic D
d during dynto the North oute planning
oute Plannin
affic gement nning
Imp
No
Yes Yes No No No
Yes No No No No
cy agreemenwhole (not jueveraging tho establish thther case, ted alternatea TPO shouldme, and dela
ase and demes. The planr performed
ndum of unde
fic managema group of
minating timor roadway have ITS devs office also perated roadus traffic conublic works al time and dee based on
ay an imporiding manpoMaintenancees, message
of OperationsDetour System
19
namic detourFlorida TPO
g.
ng
plementation
No
Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Yes Yes No No Yes
nts betweenust a singleheir ongoinghe alternatethe planning routes, and
d ensure thatay within the
mand models,ning agencystudies that
erstanding is
ment centerstrained andely travelercongestion,
vices such asincludes the
dways. Roadntrol devicesagency is toelay betweenan informed
rtant role inower to lawe Office and boards, and
n
warning sigregional tra
- FDO
- City
- City
- Cla
- Cla
- Nas
- St.
- St.
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- Tow
- Tow
Following adetour syst
Serdive
Setinvimairescom
Asssub
Shaand
Contravinfo
ShaTheava
Monfielimp
Estorig
Detmaymet
Genthe
gns during transportation
OT District 2
y of Jackson
y of Jackson
y County Pub
y County Pub
ssau County
Johns Count
Johns Count
y of Jackson
y of Atlantic
y of Fernand
y of Green Co
y of Neptune
y of St. Augu
wn of Baldwin
wn of Orange
are the rolestem from inc
rve as a leaderted. Also, a
t up or particite local autintenance oftrictions eac
mmitment in
sure that albsequent deto
are plans andd technical da
nstantly monvel time andormation sho
are and/or exe ITS data coailable.
nitor traffic cd personnel
plementation
ablish strateginal route.
termine timey be used as t.
nerate and m traffic incid
raffic detoursand public w
ville Departm
ville Traffic E
blic Works De
blic Works Tr
Public Works
ty Public Wor
ty Traffic and
ville Beach P
Beach Public
ina Beach Pu
ove Springs P
e Beach Publi
ustine Public
n Public Work
e Park Public
and responseption to imp
d agency as apply the kno
cipate in thethorities andf the roadwach agency mdeveloping a
l transportaour route pla
d maps that aata that is re
nitor the cond delay inforould be dissem
xchange the ould be the t
conditions onto conduct
and docume
egic locations
e period restran alternate
maintain the dent manage
s and traveleworks agencie
ment of Publi
Engineering D
epartment
raffic Contro
s Departmen
rks Departme
d Transporta
Public Works
c Works Depa
ublic Works D
Public Works
ic Works Dep
Works Depar
ks Departme
Works Depa
sibilities of tplementation
they are in owledge of lo
e meetings wd transportay corridor way have abo
and implemen
ation agenciean.
are available quired to sup
gestion and rmation betwminated to th
ITS and trafftraffic camer
n alternate rt site visits ent details on
s for detour
rictions basee route and te
contact list ement and d
ers informates.
c Works
Division
l Division
t
ent
tion Departm
Department
artment
Department
s Department
partment
rtment
nt
rtment
the transportn:
charge of thocal roadway
where the deation agenciewhere traffic out adding trnting detour
es involved
for the benepport this eff
incident conween the orhe motorist t
fic data with ra feeds, DM
routes if survat frequent
n roadway an
signs for dri
ed on traffic erminate the
of all respondetour activ
ion dissemin
ment
t
tation and p
he roadway and traffic in
etour route ces that are is diverted.
raffic to theiroute plan.
signed off
efit of the grofort.
nditions on thriginal route to make an in
other agencMS informatio
veillance is at intervals
nd traffic patt
ivers’ inform
conditions ae detour rout
nsible stakehvity. Provide
nation. The fo
ublic works
system to an the area to
criteria are lresponsible
At this foruir systems a
on the sele
oup. Share de
he affected rand detour
nformed en-r
cies for an apon, traffic de
available. Othduring and terns along t
mation and to
and time of dte plan when
holders in th responder
Concept oDynamic D
ollowing list
agencies in t
and from whio develop det
aid out. In te for the opm, discuss ts well as req
ected detour
etour routes
roadways anr route. The route decisio
ppropriate pletector data,
herwise, sendafter the d
the detour ro
o bring them
day as to whthese condit
he region parcontact info
of OperationsDetour System
20
outlines the
the dynamic
ich traffic istour routes.
his meeting,peration andhe issues orquiring their
r route and
, if available,
nd determinetravel time
n.
an of action., etc., where
d and assigndetour routeoute.
back to the
hen the roadtions are not
rticipating inormation for
incl
ProRoa
Opestat
Assimp
Adjthatim
Det
Mitimp
7.3. 38B38B38B38BLaw
The followiThe fire anclassified u
- Flo
- FDO
- Flo
- Jac
- Jac
- Cla
- Cla
- Nas
- Nas
- St.
- St.
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- City
- Tow
- Tow
Following a
Acc
lusion in the
ovide TMC anad Ranger se
erate and mate and local a
sist the law eplementation
ust and modt operate aning plan to a
termine trave
igate trafficplementation
w Enforcem
ng list identind rescue anunder public s
rida Highway
OT Motor Car
rida Departm
cksonville Sh
cksonville Fir
y County She
y County Pub
ssau County
ssau County
Johns Count
Johns Count
y of Jackson
y of Jackson
y of Atlantic
y of Fernand
y of Fernand
y of Green Co
y of Neptune
y of Neptune
y of St. Augu
y of St. Augu
y of St. Augu
wn of Orange
wn of Orange
are the roles
cess and inte
detour route
nd Road Ranervice covera
aintain the dyagencies.
enforcement protocol.
dify traffic signd maintain tccommodate
eler informat
c conditions.
ent and Pub
ifies the locand emergencsafety agenc
y Patrol
rrier Complia
ment of Highw
eriff’s Office
re and Rescue
eriff’s Office
blic Safety D
Sheriff’s Offi
Fire and Res
ty Sheriff’s O
ty Fire and R
ville Beach P
ville Beach F
Beach Police
ina Beach Po
ina Beach Fir
ove Springs P
e Beach Depa
e Beach Polic
ustine Depart
ustine Police
ustine Beach
e Park Depart
e Park Police
and responsi
egrate the dy
e plan.
nger supportage is availab
ynamic detou
agency in m
gnal timing bthe traffic sie additional t
tion dissemin
s in the a
blic Safety A
al law enforcecy medical sies in the nor
ance Office
way Safety a
e Departmen
epartment
ice
scue Adminis
Office
escue Depar
Police Depart
Fire Departm
e Departmen
olice Departm
re and Rescu
Police Depar
artment of Pu
e Departmen
tment of Pub
Department
Police Depar
tment of Pub
Department
ibilities of th
ynamic detou
t for the sysble.
ur system in
making an info
based on trafgnals in the raffic on loca
nation modes
area using
Agencies
ement and pservice (EMSrtheast Flori
nd Motor Ve
nt
tration
rtment
tment
ent
t
ment
ue Departmen
tment
ublic Safety
nt
lic Safety
rtment
blic Safety
e law enforce
ur system int
stem operati
the region.
ormed decisi
ffic demand. region is de
al roads.
s and messag
all available
ublic safety S) departmenda region.
hicles
nt
ement and p
o their decis
ion and main
The respons
ion to implem
Coordinationesired to dev
ges, and issue
e resources
agencies in nnts are cons
ublic safety d
sion support
Concept oDynamic D
ntenance wh
sibility is sha
ment the det
n between lovelop an alte
e press relea
s during de
northeast Flosidered as o
departments
system to no
of OperationsDetour System
21
here ITS and
red between
tour plan per
cal agenciesernate signal
ases.
etour route
orida region.one unit and
s:
otify federal,
stat
Par
Havpub
Estfollcoinred
Procon
Pardet
Firedyndev
Detmot
SetForvehthe
Shawhi
Evaalte
Cooand
Repmai
7.4. 39B39B39B39BSta
The followiState and dynamic deare carried
- Flo
- City
- Cla
- Nas
- St.
County emhurricanes force. The are not limi
Parsele
Mayimp
Accstat
te and local a
rticipate in st
ve the authoblic works ag
ablish contaow the implencide with thuce travel tim
ovide supportntrol and/or m
rticipates in our route sy
e and rescuenamic detourvelopment.
termine safetorists and p
t criteria on dr example, hhicles from thir response t
are locationsich will help a
aluate the saernate route
ordinate withd natural disa
port issues wintenance de
ate and Loca
ng list identilocal emerg
etour systemout by vario
rida Departm
y of Jackson
y County Em
ssau County
Johns Count
mergency maand other mroles and reited to:
rticipate in thected detour
y have theplementation
cess and intete and local a
agencies.
takeholder m
rity to impleencies.
ct with the lementation phe transportame and delay
t to the detomonitoring ro
all four stepstem.
e departmentr system. Wh
ty criteria repedestrians a
detour route heavy trafficheir stations time.
s of their staavoid the sele
fety of the dchoice, if saf
h transportatasters.
with the equipepartments.
al Emergenc
ifies the statency manag
m during emeous local, stat
ment of Emer
ville Emerge
mergency Man
Emergency M
ty Emergency
anagement major eventssponsibilities
he meetings r routes and s
e authority protocols se
egrate the dyagencies.
meetings to d
ment detour
ocal transpoprotocol baseation and puys on roads in
ur operationole in the fiel
ps of dynam
ts may not phile EMS onl
elated to tralong the deto
choice basedc on the alte
or dispatch f
ations and diection of alte
detour route fety becomes
tion agencies
pment in the
cy Operatio
te and local egement depaergency and te, and feder
gency Manag
ncy Managem
nagement
Management
y Manageme
departmentss such as tos of FDOT an
where stakesubsequent a
to implemeet by the stak
ynamic detou
iscuss and si
routes when
ortation agened on informeblic works agnvolved.
with numerod.
ic detour sy
articipate in y participate
affic operatioour route.
d on the exteernate routefacility adjac
ispatch faciliernate routes
as a part of s an issue.
s to deploy t
e field to the
on Center
emergency ortments playcatastrophical respondin
gement
ment
ent
s or emergeornadoes andnd county em
holders selecalternate rou
ent alternatkeholders.
ur system int
ign off on the
n needed, in
ncies to actived decisions.gencies, deto
ous traffic co
ystem route
the traffic mes and provi
ons/enforcem
ent to which e may impedcent to the ro
ities and rous that negati
an after acti
the dynamic
maintaining
operation ceny a vital rolc events. Theg agencies, s
ency operatd major thunmergency ma
ct preferred ute plans.
te routes b
o their decis
eir roles and
coordination
vate the dyn. The implemour plans to
ontrol officer
planning and
managementdes their inp
ment person
their responde ingress a
oadway, whic
utes they typively impact
ion review an
detour syste
agencies su
nters in the nle in operatie emergencysuch as:
tions centernderstorms wanagement d
alternate rou
based on in
sion support
Concept oDynamic D
responsibilit
n with transp
amic detour entation promitigate con
rs serving eit
d implement
t planning prput in detou
nel safety a
se time may and egress ch may negat
pically use fotheir respons
nd recomme
em during sp
ch as the sta
northeast Floing and maiy manageme
rs are activwith hurricadepartments
utes and sign
nformed de
system to no
of OperationsDetour System
22
ties.
ortation and
system andotocol shouldngestion and
ther a traffic
tation of the
ocess of ther route plan
nd safety of
be affected.of response
tively impact
or response,se time.
nds team on
pecial events
ate and local
orida region.ntaining the
ent functions
ated duringne like windinclude, but
ns off on the
cisions and
otify federal,
Repmai
Pla
7.5. 40B40B40B40BTra
The local trfollowing ar
Parsele
Proact
Evaope
Devadju
Dissinfo
Pardet
Prosuit
7.6. 41B41B41B41BPri
Private towparticipate remove thein the after
7.7. 42B42B42B42BEle
Elected offcriteria for the meetinand subseqimplementeknowledge
7.8. 43B43B43B43BLoc
The local msystem tracenters or activities.
port issues wintenance de
y an importa
ansit Agency
ransit agencre the roles a
rticipate in tected detour
ovide transit ivity.
aluate transiterating on the
velop an expust schedule
seminate information on e
rticipate in thour routes. F
ovide informatable or not s
vate Towing
wing companin the dyna
e wrecked ver action revie
ected Officia
ficials, and thdetour routegs where sta
quent alternaed, would con the detou
cal Media
media plays affic manage
emergency
with the equipepartments.
ant role in dis
y
y in the nortand responsi
he meetingsr routes and s
schedules t
t performance detour rout
panded sched operations
ormation on expanded sch
he discussionFor example,
ation on bus suitable for t
g Companie
nies have noamic detour ehicles from tew to provide
als and Com
he citizens’ ae selection aakeholders sate route plareate neglig
ur route that
an importament procesoperations c
pment in the
sseminating p
theast Floridbilities of the
s where staksubsequent a
to the transp
ce during dette.
edule to accs due to prim
transit operhedule.
n of traffic ctransit agen
routes and bransit routes
es
o role to playsystem opertravel lanes a
e feedback on
mmunity Gro
advisory comnd implemenelect preferr
ans. They shogible impact
may be usef
nt role in dss. Local mecenters, as a
e field to the
public inform
a region is Je transit age
eholders selalternate rou
portation ag
tour operatio
ommodate tary route clo
rators and pa
control measncy may spec
bus stations s.
y in planningration duringand eventuan system per
ups
mmittees andntation that mred detour roould help the
on commuful for the lea
isseminatingdia can alsopplicable, to
maintaining
mation to the
Jacksonville ncies:
ect preferreute plans.
gencies to in
on and determ
the additionaosure when th
assengers as
sures necessacify a minimu
in addition t
g and finalizg its implemelly off the ro
rformance an
d the technicminimizes cooutes and sige lead agencyunity lifestylad agency.
g public infoo establish c keep inform
agencies su
local media.
Transportat
ed detour rou
nclude in the
mine when tr
al traffic dehe detour ro
s well as prov
ary for efficium travel tim
o specific de
zing of detouentation and
oadway systend express th
cal coordinatommunity imgn off on they select the e. Citizens
rmation durontact with
med of the ha
Concept oDynamic D
ch as the sta
ion Authority
utes and sig
e detour rou
ransit vehicle
mand. Also, ute is implem
vide passeng
ient transit oe.
etour routes
ur route. Hod provide towem. They alsoheir concerns
tion committpact. They pe selected dedetour routemay provid
ing the dynthe traffic mappenings on
of OperationsDetour System
23
ate and local
y (JTA). The
n off on the
ute selection
es will cease
review andmented.
gers with the
operation on
that may be
owever, theyw service too participates, if any.
tee promoteparticipate inetour routese that, whene first-hand
amic detourmanagementn the detour
8.
Thmasupenv
7B7B7B7BOperatio
e operationaanagement applementing vironment in
8.1. 44B44B44B44BIns
The boundaCounties. IJacksonvillNassau CoTown of Orland area. Twhich cross
In addition District 2. FLake City, maintenancmaintenancAugustine. institutionaconcept wh
8.1.1.
The Fwest Comm
The comminformRoad stakeimple
8.1.2
The Froadwenforsignsthe Rroadw
1.
2
3
4
5
CurreMondsegmservic
onal and S
al and suppond operationthe existing
n detail.
titutional E
ary of North Included in le Beach andunty; St. Aurange Park inThese differes jurisdiction
to these locFDOT Distric
Palatka, Pce of Intersce facilities wIn addition t
al environmehen needed.
77B77B77B77BTraffic
FDOT Districof downtown
munications C
TMCs perfomunications amation conce
Ranger heeholder contaement detour
. 78B78B78B78BRoad R
FDOT Road Rways in the rcement agen along with o
Road Rangerways as show
I-95: fromCollege St
. I-295: from
. I-10: from
4. J. T. Butle
. SR 9A: fro
ently, the hoday through
ments, they cces through a
upport En
rt environmens concepts og resources.
nvironment
Florida TPOthese bound
d the Town ofgustine and n Clay Countent entities oal boundarie
cal jurisdictioct 2 serves 18Perry, St. Astates and swithin the Noto the mainteent will prov
Managemen
ct 2 Traffic an. The other Center (JRCC
orm routine and scores oferning roadwelp upon reqact list in car plans on the
anger Prog
Ranger progrnortheast F
ncies throughother servicer program iswn below:
m San Marcotreet
m I-95 south
San Marco B
er Boulevard
om Pulaski R
ours of operaFriday. Althocan service a toll-free ce
nvironmen
ent providesor technology. The followi
includes all daries are tf Baldwin in St. Augustin
ty. The totalperate and m
es.
ons, the Nort8 counties anugustine, anstate roadwaorth Florida Tenance operide manpow
nt Center
and ITS Operis located at
C).
regional suf video came
way closures vquest or fo
ase a detour eir respective
ram
am is a free lorida regionh a traffic maes during dyns along 127
o Boulevard
h to Pulaski R
Boulevard (Fu
or SR 202: f
oad to I-95 s
ation of the ough, the rothe arterial
ellular numbe
nt
s informationy by utilizinging sections
of Duval Couhe cities ofDuval Countne Beach in
North Floridmaintain seve
th Florida TPnd seven majnd Starke. Tays within tTPO service aations, thereer, material
rations Offict the Florida
urveillance oeras deployedvia 511 and dyr routine sis implemen
e roadway sy
service to mn. The Road anagement cnamic detourone way cen
to Pecan P
Road
uller Warren
from I-95 to S
southbound
Road Rangeoutes covere
system upoer, *FHP (*34
n on region’s existing resdescribe th
unty and porf Atlantic Bey; FernandinSt. Johns C
da TPO juriseral local roa
PO boundaryjor cities, whThe districttheir servicearea; one is le is a local F
and operat
ce is at the F Highway Pa
on major rod for this purynamic messurveillance nted and theystems.
motorists thaRanger serv
center to assr implementanterline mile
Park Road an
Bridge) to SR
SR A1A
er program aed by the Roon request. 47).
s capability oources with
he region’s s
rtions of Clayeach, Neptu
na Beach andCounty; and Gdiction cove
adway system
y makes up ahich include G is response area. Thelocated in EdDOT Jacksonional resour
FDOT Jacksoatrol Troop G
oadways outrpose. They asage signs. Tpurposes. T
e local jurisd
at is currentlyvice could b
sist in settingation. The rees, which ex
nd from Old
R 200 (US 3
are betweenoad Ranger pMotorists ca
Concept oDynamic D
of embracingminimal enhasupport and
y, Nassau, anne Beach, J
d the Town oGreen Cove rs 1,838 squ
ms in the reg
a major portGainesville, Jsible for opre are two
dison and thenville Bridgeces to supp
onville UrbanG’s Jacksonv
tfitted with also dissemin
They assist inThe TMC maictions are c
y deployed obe requestedg up detours gional covertends to the
St. Augusti
01)
6:30 AM anprogram arean access R
of OperationsDetour System
24
g new trafficancement or
operational
nd St. JohnsJacksonville,f Callahan inSprings and
uare miles ofion, many of
tion of FDOTJacksonville,eration andlocal FDOT
e other in St.e Office. Thisort the new
n Office justille Regional
fiber opticnate travelern dispatchingaintains thecontacted to
on five majord by the lawand warningage area fore five major
ine north to
nd 6:30 PM,e all freewayRoad Ranger
8.2. 45B45B45B45BTec
8.2.1
The ealongwouldnortharter
Thereintercused
Dynaon rodedicmessused
Figurnorth
chnical Envi
. 79B79B79B79BExisting
existing ITS ng I-95, I-10 ad install CCTheast Floridaials within th
e are 77 trachange; I-29for surveillan
mic messageadway closu
cating additioage signs arwhere appro
e 5 shows theast Florida
ironment
g ITS Netwo
network is cond I-295. Th
TV and DMS developed a
he North Flor
affic camera5 southwestnce, detectio
e signs, wherres. The dynaonal personne not availab
opriate.
the locationsregion.
ork
omprised of the coverage
along the ean ITS masteida TPO serv
s installed tt quadrant; aon, and verific
re available, amic messagnel at or neble, portable
s of all exist
traffic cameron I-295 is
entire loop oer plan updavice area.
to cover: I-9and I-10 betwcation of traf
are an efficige signs can sear the scen
changeable
ting traffic c
ras, traffic departial and
of I-295/SR ate to cover
95 between ween I-95 anffic incidents
ent outlet fosubstitute fo
ne for travelmessage sig
cameras and
etectors andis part of a9A. In additthe majority
Pecan Parknd Chaffee Rs.
or disseminator the need toer informati
gns or foldab
d dynamic m
Concept oDynamic D
d dynamic men ongoing pion, the ITS y of major fr
k Road and Road. These c
ting travelero install warnion. Where t
ble static sign
message sign
of OperationsDetour System
25
essage signsroject whichcoalition of
reeways and
I-295 southcameras are
informationning signs orthe dynamicns should be
s within the
*Source: F
Florida 511 webs
site
Figure 5. Ex
xisting ITS C
Coverage
Concept oDynamic D
of OperationsDetour System
26
9.
Seareop
8B8B8B8BSystem
veral considee discussed erate, and m
9.1. 46B46B46B46BDev
Two types region, as s
9.1.1.
The apanel
1. A“la
2. CE
3. R
4. D
The ashoullocatiselecflashi
Figur
Deployme
erations relain this sectaintain the d
vice Consid
of systems sshown in the
80B80B80B80BArteria
arterial dynaml components
Action messaDetour”, “Deanguage by t
ardinal messast and West
Route shield p
Directional ar
action messad conform toions and othted such thaing beacon tr
e 7 below sh
ent
ated to envirotion. This sedynamic deto
erations
should be cofollowing sec
l Dynamic T
mic trailblazes. The dynam
age light emielay”, “Closuhe operating
sage LED pat.
panel is a typ
row LED pan
age panel cao 2009 Manuher requiremat clear visirailblazer sig
Figure
ows the conc
onmental, tection is inte
our system.
nsidered forctions.
Trailblazer S
er sign consimic trailblaze
tting diode (ure”, “Conge agency.
anel that is u
pical static ro
nel which incl
an be used iual of Uniform
ments for flability is main assembly.
e 6. Arterial
ceptual layou
echnical, and ended to pro
dynamic det
Sign
sts of regulaer sign assem
(LED) panel estion”, etc.
used to show
oute shield pa
udes arrow s
n place of am Traffic Co
ashing beacontained for
l Dynamic T
ut for arteria
institutionalovide sugges
tour system
ar static trailbmbly typically
that is usedand their a
w the cardina
anel.
showing thru
additional flantrol Device
on signs. Thethe motoris
Trailblazer S
al trailblazer s
l aspects of tstions to th
deployment
blazer signs y consists of:
to convey aapproved ab
al informatio
u, left and rig
ashing lights(MUTCD) Ch
e location ots. Figure 6
Sign
sign placeme
Concept oDynamic D
the system de agencies
in the north
with ITS LED:
action messabreviations
on such as N
ht arrows.
. These signhapter 4L forf these sign
6 below show
ent in a corrid
of OperationsDetour System
27
deploymentsthat deploy,
heast Florida
D display sub
age, such asas standard
North, South,
n assembliesr installation
ns should bews a sample
dor.
N
Fig
gure 7. Arte
rial Dynami
c Trailblaze
er Sign Conc
cept Layout
Concept oDynamic D
t
of OperationsDetour System
28
The astreenotifioptiostaticcover
9.1.2.
Artercompinformthree
The abeforbe co
1.
2
3
4
5
6
7
If thedisplaand a
Figur
arterial trailbt level on paed ahead ofn provides fc trailblazer rage is neede
. 81B81B81B81BArteria
rial DMS mapared to the tmation dissee lines of text
arterial DMSre entering thonsidered for
TRAVELT
. FREEWAY
. < ROAD NA
4. FREEWAY
. USE 511 FO
. DETOUR A
. <ROAD NA
e message isayed in two all other DMS
e 9 below sh
blazer optionrallel and cro
f time beforeflexibility to option, this
ed to activate
l Dynamic M
ay substitutetrailblazer opmination. Thts. Figure 8 b
*Ar
S messages she cross stredisplay are s
IME/I-95 <XX
Y CONGESTIO
AME> CONGE
Y CONGESTIO
OR DRIVER I
ACTIVATED /
AME> CONGE
s long, thenphases. Use
S requiremen
ows the conc
n includes deoss streets ae entering thchoose betwflexibility noe flashing be
Message Sig
e for arteriaption, but prohe arterial DMbelow shows
Figure
terial DMS at
should be sheet intersectishown below
X> MIN, US 1 <
ON / USE <RO
ESTED / USE
ON / DETOUR
NFORMATIO
/ FOLLOW <R
ESTED / USE
the DMS sof 2009 MU
ts.
cept layout o
eployment ofat major intehe cross streween freewaot available. acons remot
gns
al trailblazeovides additioMS are smalla sample art
8. Arterial
Blanding Boul
hort and to ng and leadin
w:
<XX> MIN
OAD NAME> <
E <ROAD NAM
R ACTIVATED
ON
ROAD NAME>
DETOUR
hould be runUTCD Chapte
of the arteria
f static or dyrsection poineet leading
ay directionsIn either cas
tely.
r signs. Thional flexibilitler in size coterial DMS.
DMS
evard/SR 21
the point prng to freewa
<DIRECTION>
ME>
D
> <DIRECTION
n in flashinger 2L is reco
al DMS.
ynamic trailbnts, as shownto freeway.
s that are imse, the ITS c
is is a morety to the sysompared to f
roviding actiy. A few sam
>
N>
g mode and ommended fo
Concept oDynamic D
blazer signs n in Figure 7The dynami
mpacted whecommunicatio
e expensivetem operatoreeway DMS
ion messagemple message
the informaor DMS mess
of OperationsDetour System
29
at the cross. Drivers arec trailblazer
ereas, in theons network
e alternativer in terms of
S with two to
es to driverses that could
ation can besage display
N
Figu
ure 9. Arter
ial DMS Con
ncept Layou
ut
Concept oDynamic D
of OperationsDetour System
30
1 Ins
The choiceprovides th
T
Advantage 1. Easier to i2. Lower co3. Lower ma4. Simpler s5. Lower po
Advantage 1. Maximum 2. Maximum3. Can be us4. Longer lif5. Higher vis6. Can be de7. Can be us
9.2. 47B47B47B47BCor
Four majordeploymencoverage o
I-95 (
I-295
I-10 (
SR 2
SR 202 orstreets in controller ddeployed incoverage o
9.3. 48B48B48B48BCos
The followiBased on relatively lbenefit-costhe region. to the moconsideringtrailblazer the dynami
stallation of arte
e of device dhe list of adva
Table 4. List
install st option aintenance astructural supwer requirem
flexibility fom flexibility tosed for otherfe cycle sibility esigned to gosed for specia
rridor Consi
r corridors int. Table 5 bn mainline an
(St. Johns Cou
5/SR 9A (entir
US 301 to I-95
02/JTB (US 1
r J. Turner Bthe northea
deployment. n the regionn the major c
st Considera
ing table shothe informaower cost co
st analysis ofThe arterial
torists unlikg the needsand arterial ic detour sys
erial DMS is cur
depends on antages and
of Advantag
nd operatingpport ment
r message dio choose acti events and s
o over travel al event info
ideration
n the northebelow providend cross stre
Freeway
unty line to GA
re loop)
5)
to SR A1A)
Butler Highwst Florida reOnly a few c
n0F0F0F0F
1. In order cross street
ations
ows the apption provideompared to f the two optl dynamic tra
ke the DMS are differe
DMS systemtem.
rently underway
various factdisadvantage
es and Disad
Arter
g cost
A
isplay ion messagesafety messa
lane rmation disp
east Florida res the informeets.
Table 5.
A State line)
way does notegion have Iross streetsfor a dynamlevel is requi
roximate coed in the ta
the arterial tions as well ailblazer optioption. Hownt for the
ms could also
y on SR 21 and U
tors and thees of the two
dvantages of
rial Trailblaz
rterial DMS
age display
lay
region are bmation on n
. Corridor Inf
No. of Interchang
(On Ramp
35
30
12
11
t have any eTS coveragehave CCTV d
mic detour sired.
sts of systeble, arterial DMS optionas the amouion is limited
wever, prioriurban region
o be consider
US 17 in Clay Co
e needs of to concepts:
Arterial Trai
er Disadvanta1. Message 2. Less flex3. Lower lif4. Lower vi5. Increase
Disadvanta1. Higher de2. Higher p3. Requires4. Higher m
being consideumber of in
ormation
ges M
ps) ITS C
P
P
P
N
existing ITS e and the ITdeployed andsystem to be
m installatiodynamic tr
. A further aunt of messagd in its flexibty should bn compared red to save c
unty.
the study ar
ilblazer and D
age is restricted
xibility to chofe cycle isibility
ed number of
age eployment co
power requires overhead stmaintenance
ered for the terchanges
Mainline
Coverage
Partial
Partial
Partial
None
coverage. InTS coverage d none of thee fully funct
on and operarailblazers wanalysis wouge dissemina
bility of provie given to
to rural recost as well
Concept oDynamic D
rea. The foll
DMS Concep
d to detour onoose action m
f signs neede
ost ements tructure desand operatin
dynamic deon the corri
Cross Street
ITS Coverage
Partial
None
None
None
n addition, vais limited t
e cross streettional and ef
ations and mwith LED subuld be needeation flexibiliiding differenthe need of
egion. A mixas meeting t
of OperationsDetour System
31
lowing table
ts
nly message
ed
ign ng cost
tour systemdor and ITS
arious crosso ITS signalts have DMSffective, ITS
maintenance.b-panels areed to do thety needed innt messagesf the regionx of arterialthe needs of
A
S
A
S
*
*
Free
Arterial Dynam
I-95
I-295/SR 9A
I-10
SR 202/JTB
Arterial DMS*
I-95
I-295/SR 9A
I-10
SR 202/JTB
*Arterial trailbla
**DMS: Dynamic
9.4. 49B49B49B49BPow
The systemsystem compower backbattery bac
9.5. 50B50B50B50BDev
Communicacurrently a
Har
Wir
Rad
Mic
Sat
Communica
Theto c
TheTele
TheDat
Thebetsign
way
mic Trailblaze
**
azer cost is $50
c Message Signs
wer Supply
m power supmmunication kup option. Dckup should b
vice Commu
ation betweevailable:
rd wired com
reless commu
dio frequency
crowave com
tellite commu
ations other
e New Jerseycommunicate
e Oklahomaecommunica
e City of Palota Acquisition
e California ween wind sns and dynam
NoInterc
r*
3
3
1
O
3
3
1
O0,000 each with
s; assumed two
Considerati
ply should band operatio
Due to the hibe provided f
unication Co
en devices a
munication u
unication
y communica
munication
unication
than hard wi
y Turnpike ane with the ITS
a environmtion System
o Alto, Califon (SCADA) sy
Oregon Advsensors and smic message
Table 6
o. of changes
35
30
12
11
Option I Total
35
30
12
11
Option II Total an O&M cost of
DMS per interch
ions
be designed ion. This can bgh power reqfor emergenc
onsideration
nd respondin
using fiber op
ation
red commun
nd the City oS devices.
mental mon(OLETS) leas
rnia transmitystem via the
vanced Transtatic and dysign messag
6. System Co
Ca
$3,5
$3,0
$1,2
$1,10
$8,8
$8,0
$6,9
$2,7
$2,5
$20,2f $2,000 per un
hange at $115,00
in such a wabe obtained quirement ofcy.
ns
ng agencies
ptics, copper
ication are s
f Aurora, Co
nitoring syssed telecom
ts the water e City’s telep
nsportation Synamic messge.
ost Table
pital Cost
500,000.00
000,000.00
00,000.00
00,000.00
800,000.00
050,000.00
900,000.00
760,000.00
530,000.00
240,000.00 nit per year; assu
00 each with O&
ay that thereby seamlessf the LED an
can be done
r wires, or tel
uccessfully i
lorado use ce
stem utilizelines for the
level sensorphone and ra
System (COsage signs to
uming two trailb
&M cost of $5,7
e is no singlly designing
nd DMS conce
e through va
lephone line
implemented
ellular digita
es Oklahom system com
r data to the dio commun
OATS) utilizeo automatica
Concept oDynamic D
O&M Cos
(per year
$140,000.0
$120,000.0
$48,000.0
$44,000.0
$352,000.0
$402,500.0
$345,000.0
$138,000.0
$126,500.0
$1,012,000.blazers per inter
00 per unit per
e point of fathe entire syepts, at least
arious metho
network
d by the follow
l packet data
ma Law Emmunication.
Supervisoryication netwo
es radio comally activate
of OperationsDetour System
32
st
)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
.00 rchange.
year.
ailure duringystem with at a two hour
ods that are
wing states:
a technology
Enforcement
Control andorks.
mmunicationthe flashing
9.6. 51B51B51B51BArt
Arterial sigimplementaonto the losignal timinmulti-jurisdthe local rotraffic on lo
In addition,signal coormake it thconsidered
- Min
- Mintraf
9.6.1.
Whensignatiminplace
1. TlibtrcethfaTmw
2. Csllocaminotrcec
3. Aasyploin
Any osignathe d
terial Signal
gnal timing ation to reduocal roadwayng plan in pldiction coordoadways. Thocal roadway
, signal systedination occ
hrough these for the traff
nimum pedes
nimum left tuffic.
. 82B82B82B82BTraffic
n traffic is divl timing alog along deto
e. Different ty
raffic Respobrary of pre-ased on prevraffic demanentral monitohat more clacility to eacMC operator
malfunctions, weather emer
losed-loop Slave configuroop system. apabilities, a
make adjustmn the closed perate prederaffic conditurrent timinvents (e.g., losures, polic
Adaptive Tradvanced andystem and alans and ma
ow thresholdn real time w
of these threl systems, adifferent adap
l Timing Mo
modificationuce delay andys, traffic is ace to help m
dination as thhe regular ti
ys due to deto
em coordinaturs when a g
e signals witfic signal timi
trian clearan
urn green ti
Signal Syst
verted to deng arterial cur routes is d
ypes of traffi
onsive System-established valent trafficd using vehioring capabilosely matchch intersectirs may overri
or during rgencies, roa
Systems: Closration. The mThe master llowing the o
ments as needloop may be
etermined timions. Howevg plans basetraffic incidece actions, et
ffic Signal Cd complex ty responsive ke timing ads for splits, oithin those th
ee traffic sigdaptive traffptive control
dification C
n is an impod improve traadded to itsmove traffic here might bime-of-day sour activities
tion is needegroup of two th a minimuing modificat
nce times bas
me should b
em and Cap
tour routes, corridors to dependent onc signal syst
m: Traffic-retiming plans
c conditions. cle detectionlities and aut
h prevalent on controlleide current tevents (e.gd closures, p
sed loop sysmaster contr
controller uoperating ageded. Commune provided byming plans wer, like traffed on trafficents, specialtc.).
Control Systypes of systcontrol syst
djustments baoffsets and chresholds.
gnal system fic signal consystems cur
onsideratio
ortant step avel time on capacity ansmoothly th
be more thanignal timing s.
ed to operator more trafm number otion are:
sed on the ro
be allotted,
pabilities
it is advantaaccommoda
n the capabilems are avai
sponsive cons. The plan sTraffic condn. The primatomatic downtraffic condr is a commiming plans b., traffic inc
police actions
stems includeoller dictates
usually includency to downnications bety wire line orwhich are sefic responsivc conditions,l events, roa
em: Traffic tems. The ptem is that aased upon gcycle lengths
types will wntrol offers thrrently in ope
ons
towards a the arterial
nd it is impohrough the an one jurisdic
plan may n
e traffic withffic signals aof stops pos
oadway chara
possibly in e
ageous to haate detouredlities of the tilable for this
ntrol systemelected by aitions are dery benefits onloading of sitions. Comm
mon charactebased on tracidents, spes, etc.).
e a group of s the timing des communnload timingtween the mar wireless mlected basedve systems, , hardware oadway const
adaptive traprimary diffeadaptive conathering rea
s are establis
work in a dynhe most flex
eration.
successful dnetwork. Whrtant to hav
arterial corridction that coot be suffici
h minimum dare working tssible. A few
acteristics.
each cycle, t
ave the capad traffic. Thetraffic signal s purpose inc
ms select a sa traffic respetermined baof traffic ressignal timing munications
eristic of trafffic condition
ecial events,
interconnecof other tra
nications (wir plans, monitaster controledia. Genera
d upon eitheoperations
or software truction, wea
affic controlerence betwetrol systems
al-time trafficshed, and the
namic detouxibility. The fo
Concept oDynamic D
dynamic dethen the traffive a policy adors. This montrols the sent to hand
delays and stogether so tw things tha
to clear hea
bility of adjue coordinatiocontrol syst
cluding:
ignal timing onsive systesed upon fieponsive systplans to profrom a cen
ffic responsins, hardware roadway c
cted signals ffic signals ired, wirelesstor the signaller and otheally, closed lor time of dapersonnel mmalfunction
ather emerge
systems areen an adaps do not havc data. Instee traffic sign
r environmeollowing sect
of OperationsDetour System
33
tour systemc is divertednd a backupay require a
signals alongle additional
tops. Trafficthat the carsat should be
avy left turn
usting trafficon of signalem that is in
plan from aem is usuallyld measuredtems includeovide timingsntral controlive systems.
e or softwareconstruction,
in a master-n the closed
s, or dial-up)al timing andr controllersoop systemsy or varying
may overrides, or duringencies, road
re the mostptive controle set timingad, high and
nal will adapt
nt. Of thesetion outlines
9.6.2
The rinfrasthe gproviexam
9.7. 52B52B52B52BSys
Once the interfaces then the insoftware isdynamic desoftware tothan the ex
In addition existing SuThis would TMCs to opsystem andis required.
2. 83B83B83B83BAdaptiv
real-time adastructure to sgreen time, de real-time
mples of adap
Sydney Co
Split Cycle
Real-Time
Real-Time
Optimizat
Urban Tra
Adaptive T
Method fo
Streetwise
QuicTrac
InSync® S
stem Interfa
ITS systemsbetween the
nformation ts used to intetour systemo integrate wxisting interfa
to the dynamunGuide® sys
require an perate local d the traffic s.
ve Traffic Si
aptive trafficsupport the rwherever po
e signal systtive signal co
oordinated A
e Offset Opti
e Traffic-Ada
e Hierarchica
ion Policies f
affic Optimiza
Traffic Contr
or the Optimi
e
System
ace Conside
s in the regese systems hat will be etegrate the e
m is new to thwithin the exace for the m
mic detour sstem should interagency traffic signa
signal contro
ignal Contro
c signal contremote controssible, traffem coordinaontrol system
Adaptive Traf
imization Tec
ptive Contro
al Optimized D
for Adaptive
ation by Integ
rol System (A
zation for Tr
erations
ion are idenare defined.
exchanged oexisting and he region andxisting architmainline DMS
ystem interfalso be expagreement
als after houol system, co
ol System
trol is an emrol of the trafic adaptive ation based ms:
ffic System (S
chnique (SCO
ol Software (R
Distributed a
Control (OPA
grated Autom
ATCS)
raffic Signals
ntified and f. Once the cn each of thproposed in
d would requecture. Howe.
ace considerplored for theto establish
urs. In the ammunication
merging techaffic signal sy
signal cooron real-time
SCATS)
OOT)
RT-TRACS)
and Effective
AC)
mation (SPOT
in On-line Co
functionalityconnections he interfacesnterfaces intoire a new intever, the int
rations, traffe implementoperational
bsence of anns between T
nology that ystem. Otherrdination shoe demand. T
e System (RH
T/UTOPIA)
ontrolled Net
y defined, thbetween thes is defined. o the region
terface and uterface shou
fic signal systation of det
responsibilitn interface bTMC operato
Concept oDynamic D
requires comr than manuaould be implhe following
HODES)
tworks (MOT
he existing ae systems ar
The FDOT’snal ITS architupdate to theld not be mu
tem integrattour and respties or to albetween thers and local a
of OperationsDetour System
34
mmunicationally adjustinglemented to
g is a list of
TION)
and plannedre identified,s SunGuide®tecture. Thee SunGuide®uch different
tion with theponse plans.low regional
e SunGuide®agency staff
10
Thim
0. 9B9B9B9BOperatio
e following tplementation
10.1. 53B53B53B53BSin
Scenario: Amorning pethe traffic traffic is aconnected
Action Plan
The followi
1. When ccamera
2. The TMalternaroute wroad, th
3. The TMinforma
4. The TMdecisioinciden
5. The TMmedicathe staprovide
6. Law ensupport
7. The dyinterch
8. The detthe freestablisactivity
9. When tnormal
10. Finally,discussbe cond
The followithe concep
onal Scena
three operatn.
ngle Segmen
A truck rolleeak hour. Resmanagemenllowed to reto a parallel
n:
ng list outlin
congestion sas and detect
MC determinte route cho
with that of then the detou
MC activates ation. It also
MC, in associan points to pt segment.
MC coordinatel service to irt and end ex
e to these ag
forcement at additional t
ynamic detouanges to dire
tour activity eeway and tshed threshoy for the segm
he detour syoperational
the involvesed during reducted. This
ng Figure 10 t layout.
arios
tional scenar
nt Impact
d over on a sponders arr
nt process. Tlease. This croad with se
es the action
starts to buitor system in
nes the segmice at the uphe detouredur activities s
the freewaycoordinates
ation with theprovide moto
es with law enform about xit numbers oencies.
nd the TMC traffic in thei
ur system siect traffic aro
is coordinattravel time old values, ament.
ystem is de-acondition.
ed agencies gular after aeffort should
shows the c
rios describe
six-lane frerived at the iTraffic is stacrash occurreveral signals
n plan for the
ld and traffinformation fo
ment of imppstream inter route. If theshould be ini
dynamic mewith the loca
e local jurisdrists guidanc
nforcement athe detour a
of the freewa
also coordinr system. Sig
igns at key ound the net
ted with the difference
all involved
activated, the
should be coaction reviewd be led by lo
oncept layou
e the concep
eway blockinincident scenrting to builed on a free
s. The paralle
e single segm
ic starts moor verification
pact and corchange. Thee difference itiated.
essage sign ual 511 office a
ictions, activce on returni
agencies, locactivation in ay impact up
nate with thegnal system c
decision poitwork to get b
mainline trafbetween oriagencies sh
e traffic sign
oordinated fw or, if the iss
cal transport
ut of the sing
pt of operati
ng two northne and securd up and on
eway segmenel road is a fo
ment impact i
oving slowly, n.
nsiders dissey should comin travel tim
upstream of and media to
vates the dyning back to t
cal transit agtheir region
pstream and
e local jurisdicoordination
ints should back on their
ffic activity. iginal route
hould be coo
nal timing and
for an after sue is major, tation agenc
gle segment i
ions for the
hbound lanesred the incidnly one lane nt between tour lane road
ncident scen
the TMC sh
seminating mmpare the tre on freeway
the incidentdisseminate
namic detourheir original
gency, fire anof impact. Thdownstream
ictions to acn should be ac
be activatedr original pat
Once the coand detour
ordinated to
d coordinatio
action reviethen an inci
cies.
impact and t
Concept oDynamic D
dynamic de
s on the fredent scene an
is open fromtwo interchaway.
nario:
hould pull up
motorist inforavel time ony is greater t
t to dissemine traveler info
r system signpath downst
nd rescue andhe TMC shou of the probl
tivate respoctivated.
d only betweth.
ongestion is cr route falls
de-escalate
on should be
ew. The issudent review
he key decis
of OperationsDetour System
35
tour system
eway duringnd activatedm which thenges that is
p the traffic
ormation forn the originalthan arterial
nate travelerormation.
ns at the keytream of the
d emergencyuld designateem area and
nse plans to
een the two
cleared froms below thee the detour
e returned to
ues could bemeeting can
ion points of
Figure 10.
Single Segm
ment Impac
ct - Concept
t Layout
Concept oDynamic D
of OperationsDetour System
36
10.2. 54B54B54B54BMu
Scenario: Apeak hour. and secureand there issegment wa parallel ro
Action Plan
The followi
1. When ccamerainterch
2. The TMalternaroute wroad, th
3. The TMtraveleinforma
4. The TMdecisioinciden
5. The TMemergedesignaproblem
6. Law ensupportincidencoordin
7. The keythe net
8. The detthe freeall invo
9. When tnormal
10. Finally,discussbe cond
The followiof the conc
ltiple-Segm
A multiple caThis crash bd the incidens only one laith two intercoad with mul
n:
ng list outlin
congestion sas and detectanges, depen
MC determinte route cho
with that of then the detou
MC activates r informatioation.
MC, in associan points to pt segment.
MC coordinaency medicaate the startm area and p
nforcement at additional tt impact on
nation plan sh
y decision powork. Traffic
tour activity eway and tralved agencie
he detour syoperational
the involvesed during reducted. This
ng Figure 11 cept layout.
ment Impact
r crash occubacked up trant scene, andne open fromchanges imptiple signals.
es the action
starts to buitor system innding on the
nes the segmice at the uphe detouredur activities s
the freewayn. It also co
ation with theprovide moto
tes with lawl services at and end erovide to the
and the TMCtraffic in the
n the freewahould be acti
oints should c should not b
is coordinatavel time diffees should be c
ystem is de-acondition.
ed agencies gular after aeffort should
shows the co
urred on a sixaffic betweend activated tm which the tacted and bl. The parallel
n plan for the
ld and traffinformation foextent of co
ment of imppstream inter route. If theshould be ini
y dynamic meoordinates w
e local jurisdrists guidanc
w enforcemebout the de
exit numbersese agencies.
C coordinateeir system. Tay to preparvated for the
be activatedbe directed t
ted with the erence betwecoordinated t
activated, the
should be coaction reviewd be led by lo
oncept layou
x-lane freewan two interchhe traffic matraffic is alloocked due tol road is a fou
e multiple-seg
ic starts moor verificationgestion and
pact and corchange. Thee difference itiated.
essage sign with the loca
ictions, activce on returni
ent agenciesetour activats of the free.
s with the lThe local jurire a proper e detour ope
d between tho the freewa
mainline trafeen original rto de-escalat
e traffic sign
oordinated fw or, if the iss
cal transport
t of the mult
ay blocking thanges. Respanagement pwed to relea
o the incidenur lane roadw
gment impac
oving slowly, n. This detec
d slow down.
nsiders dissey should comin travel tim
upstream ofal 511 office
vates the dyning back to t
s, local trantion in their eway impact
ocal jurisdicisdiction sho
response pration.
e interchangay in between
ffic activity. route and dete the detour
nal timing and
for an after sue is major, tation agenc
tiple-segmen
two northbouponders arrivprocess. Traffase. This crast. The interc
way.
ct incident sc
the TMC shction mainly
seminating mmpare the tre on freeway
f the congestand media
namic detourheir original
nsit agenciesregion of im
t upstream
ctions to actould be madeplan. The sig
ges of impactn the segmen
Once the coetour route far activity for
d coordinatio
action reviethen an inci
cies.
nt impact and
Concept oDynamic D
und lanes duved at the incfic is starting
sh occurred ohanges are c
cenario:
hould pull upranges betw
motorist inforavel time ony is greater t
tion area to to dissemin
r system signpath downst
s, fire and mpact. Theand downstr
ivate respone aware of thgnal timing
t to direct trnt impacted.
ongestion is calls below 15-the segment
on should be
ew. The issudent review
d the key dec
of OperationsDetour System
37
ring eveningcident sceneg to build upon a freewayconnected to
p the trafficween multiple
ormation forn the originalthan arterial
disseminateate traveler
ns at the keytream of the
rescue, andTMC shouldream of the
nse plans tohe extent ofand system
raffic around
cleared from-20 minutes,t.
e returned to
ues could bemeeting can
cision points
Figure 11. M
Multiple-Seg
gment Impac
ct - Concept
t Layout
Concept oDynamic D
of OperationsDetour System
38
10.3. 55B55B55B55BCor
Scenario: Mrequire lananticipated
Action Plan
The followi
1. When ccamerainterch
2. The TMalternaroute wroad, th
3. The TMtraveleinforma
4. The frescenaridiverte
5. The TMon theifreewaybe actcoordin
6. Law ensupportincidencoordin
7. The traalternashould
8. The TMlocal ju
9. The cojurisdic
10. Dynamtraffic a
11. Detour from thsegmen
12. The deconditio
13. Finally,discussbe cond
The followiconcept lay
rridor Impac
Major construne closures d to have a m
n:
ng list outlin
congestion sas and detectanges, depen
MC determinte route cho
with that of then the detou
MC activates r informatioation.
eeway trafficio, the conged to the loca
MC coordinater system. Thy to prepare ivated to su
nation is exte
nforcement at additional tt impact on
nation plan sh
ansit agencyte route. In aconsider re-r
MC should derisdictions to
ngestion impctions operat
ic signage ataround the n
activity shohe freeway alnt.
etour systemon.
the involvesed during reducted. This
ng Figure 12 yout.
ct
uction activitor traffic paajor impact o
es the action
starts to buitor system innding on the
nes the segmice at the uphe detouredur activities s
the freewayn. It also co
c is divertedestion may col roadway ne
es with the lhe local jurisd
an appropriaupport the ensive and m
and the TMCtraffic on the
n the freewahould be acti
y and area saddition, the routing their
esignate the o quickly sco
pact on the ing and main
t key decisionetwork.
ould be coordll the agencie
m is de-activ
ed agencies gular after aeffort should
shows the c
ties are undeacing operaton traffic flow
n plan for the
ld and traffinformation foextent of co
ment of imppstream inter route. If theshould be ini
y dynamic meoordinates w
d upstream over a longeretwork that a
ocal jurisdicdiction shoulate responsedetour activay require th
C coordinateeir system. Tay to preparvated for the
schools shoufire and rescresponse ve
exit numberpe out the ar
freeway shontaining the s
n points shou
dinated withes should be
vated and tr
should be coaction reviewd be led by lo
oncept layou
erway on a stions by thew on the corr
e corridor imp
ic starts moor verificationgestion and
pact and corchange. Thee difference itiated.
essage sign with the loca
at the tail or stretch of falso has local
tions to activd be made a
e plan. The sivity. In this he involveme
e with the loThe local jurre a proper e detour ope
ld consider cue, EMS andehicles to avo
rs of freewayrea of impact
ould be quicksignal system
uld be activa
the mainlincoordinated
affic signal
oordinated fw or, if the iss
cal transport
ut of the corr
section of fre law enforcridor level.
pact incident
oving slowly, on. This deted slow down,
nsiders dissey should comin travel tim
upstream ofal 511 office
of the congefreeway withl traffic acce
vate responsaware of the ignal timing
roadway cent of multipl
ocal jurisdictisdiction shoresponse p
ration.
reschedulingd law enforceoid delay and
y impact frot.
kly estimatedms and area r
ted between
ne incident a to de-escala
coordination
for an after sue is major, tation agenc
ridor impact
reeway that cement agen
t scenario:
the TMC shction mainlywhich is som
seminating mmpare the tre on freeway
f the congestand media
estion to theh multiple intssing the fre
se plans to sextent of thand system losure the ne operating a
tions to actould be madeplan. The sig
g or reroutinement stationd congestion.
om start to f
d to identifyroadways.
n the intercha
ctivity. Onceate the detou
n is returned
action reviethen an inci
cies.
and the key
Concept oDynamic D
will reduce cncy. The con
hould pull up ranges betw
metimes corri
motorist inforavel time ony is greater t
tion area to to dissemin
e local roadterchanges. Teeway.
support addite incident imcoordinationneed for sigagencies.
ivate respone aware of tgnal timing
ng their busns in the impa.
inish and pr
y the impact
anges of imp
e the incidenur activity in
d to normal
ew. The issudent review
decision junc
of OperationsDetour System
39
capacity andnstruction is
p the trafficween severalidor wide.
ormation forn the originalthan arterial
disseminateate traveler
way. In thisThe traffic is
tional trafficmpact on then plan shouldgnal system
nse plans tohe extent ofand system
ses along anacted region
ovide to the
on multiple
act to direct
nt is clearedthe corridor
operational
ues could bemeeting can
ctions of the
Figure
12. Corrido
or Impact - C
Concept Lay
yout
Concept oDynamic D
of OperationsDetour System
40
11.
Thproduthedeeqcoosys
10B10B10B10BStandard
e operationocedures to ring congeste northeast Fcision pointsuipment andordination, dstem.
11.1. 56B56B56B56BImp
The implemextensive mequipment includes dethe detouramong respbe orientedinformationinformed dbelow.
The corridoavailability 9A, I-10 andrequire humgenerally ravailable, b
11.2. 57B57B57B57BRes
The followi
1. Field Vvicinityshould Responthat are
2. TIM Proand shoincidencommu
3. Contacstakehorespond
4. Annual proposeThis asshould detour experie
11.3. 58B58B58B58BSys
In this condetour systtrailblazer with limitetraveler inavailable, b
d Operatin
al scenariosestablish a
tion and incidFlorida regios on maps. d resource decision supp
plementatio
mentation ofmulti-jurisdicresources b
efining the der segment foponders and d to the new n and traffic decisions for
or selection tin the regio
d SR 202. Thman intervenrequired. Thubut also on th
sponder Ori
ng bullets ou
Visits: Respony to gather fi
me made fnders should e specifically
ocesses: Resould be traint response fo
unications sho
t Lists: A coolders’ key ding agencie
Review: Resed changes asessment is be performeoperation d
ences.
stem and Re
cept of opertem. First issystem is a d flexibility formation d
but in either
ng Proced
s described coordinated
dents on arteon, a study a
This sectionusage, equi
port framewo
on Plan Over
f the dynamctional coordbetween statetour segmeor device orextensive ussystem in cadetour activdetour impl
to implementn. Four majo
he dynamic dntion in casesus, the level he interaction
ientation an
utline the nee
nders shouldirsthand infofrequently aprovide com
y geared towa
ponders shoed in the traor responderould be follow
ntact list shopersonnel ins.
sponders shoand modificarequired ford with the reuring the las
esource Dep
ration docum the arterialcombinationfor messag
disseminationcase, these
ures
in the earld and consiserials and frerea has beenn will definepment functork, and esc
rview
ic detour syination and e and local nt and assig
r equipment se of technoase needed tvities. A decilementation.
t detour operor highways wetour system
s where enginof control a
n required am
nd Coordina
ed for respon
d make themormation on tnd notes sh
mments and fards the map
uld be familiaffic incident r safety, safewed for the d
ould be prepnvolved in t
ould re-conveations that mr an efficientesponders fost year and
ployment
ment, there a trailblazer s
n of both ITSe changes.
n. However, devices sho
ier section stent approaeeways. In orn defined ande the implemtionality andalation and d
ystem on thinstitutional agencies. Thning detour placement.
logy during io provide adsion supportA brief disc
ration depenwere identifiem can be desineering judgmand automatimong agencie
tion
nder orientat
mselves familthe detour rehould be maeedback on t
p updates.
ar with theirmanagemen
e and quick cdetour opera
ared and mathe detour
ene for an anmay be requirt operation or a comprehelessons learn
are two typesystem and S and static The arterial the use of
uld be opera
require defach for an erder to impled equipment
mentation pld cost comde-escalation
e local roadsupport to s
he general croutes and iThis concep
implementatdditional suppt framework cussion on d
nds on agenced for detouigned to worment is requion will be des.
ion and coor
liar with theegion and unade for any the detour m
r roles and rent processes.clearance, antion.
aintained by operation. T
nnual reviewred due to fi
of the detourensive perfoned should b
es of systemsecond is thsign assemb DMS provid either syst
ated in coord
fining a set fficient traffement the dyt locations wan and provparison, resn procedures
dway systemsynergize thoncept of a identifying thpt requires ion. Howeveport as and wshould be de
decision sup
y priority, anr operation.
rk in an autonired. Coordin
dependent on
rdination:
detour routnderstand its
changes thmaps by parti
esponsibilitie. The Nationa
nd prompt, re
the traffic mThis list sho
of the detouield operatior route. In adrmance meabe noted to
ms identifiedhe arterial Dbly that provde consideratem dependdination with
Concept oDynamic D
of standarfic managemynamic detouere identifievide the infosponder ories of the dyn
m and freewae use of mandynamic de
he key decissystematic cr, the respon
when neededesigned to aport system
nd material aThey are I-9
nomous mannnation amongn the level o
te as well ass complexityhat may havicipating in t
s listed in thal Unified Goeliable, and in
management ould be shar
ur maps and onal or physiddition, an anasures assess
learn from t
for use in tMS system.
vides detour ably more fs on the IT
h the regiona
of OperationsDetour System
41
rd operatingment systemur system ind at the keyormation on
entation andnamic detour
ays requiresn power andtour systemion points incoordinationnders shouldd for travelerid in making is provided
and resource95, I-295/SRner, but mayg agencies isof manpower
s its generaly. Field visitsve occurred.he meetings
his documentoal (NUG) fornteroperable
center of allred with all
go over thecal changes.nnual reviewsment of thethe previous
the dynamicThe arterialinformation
lexibility forTS coverageal TMCs. The
system dep
The dynamresponsibleare responsother respotypical syst
Apart fromthe regionawhen the lsignals, if tand sharingsignal systeSunGuide®signal systproceduresoperationa
11.4. 59B59B59B59BDec
The decisiodynamic deagency destransportatto relieve cThe followigreater thashould be li
ployed at the
ic detour syse for TMC coosible for signonding agenctem and reso
F
m the interagal TMC and loocal agenciethe detour isg the responem interface
® software; thtem interfacs, including pl guidelines a
cision Supp
on support syetour systemsignated as tion as well acongestion ding flow chaan the arteriaifted.
key decision
stem requireordination annal coordinatcies for the dource coordin
Figure 13. Sy
ency coordinocal agencieses are closeds activated. Ansibility. Anoe into the FDOherefore, an ce should bhone calls anare in place.
ort System
ystem providm implementresponsible as public safeuring incidenrt shows tw
al road, then
n points shou
s cross-jurisnd providing tion when reqetour system
nation betwe
ystem and R
nation, a cens to operated. In such caAn interagenther vital asOT’s SunGuidalternate wa
be researchend faxes, betw
des foundatiotation. Althofor a particuety agenciesnts while proo critical dethe detour s
uld be activat
dictional cootraffic monitquested for dm deploymenen multiple j
Resource C
nter to centeand control
ases, the regncy agreemepect of this de® softwareay to establied until theween agencie
onal support ough, the ultular roadway is paramoun
oviding driveecision pointshould be act
ted for trave
ordination antoring informdetour opera
nt and operaturisdictions.
oordination
er (C2C) interthe traffic si
gional TMCs nt would beC2C commue. Currently, sh communice SunGuide®es can be em
information timate decisy system, thnt. The prima
ers a route cs, if the diffivated. When
ler informati
nd support, wmation to locaation. The TMtion. The follo
n Diagram
rface shouldignal systemmay operaterequired to
unication wou this capabilication with t® integratiomployed effec
for informedion falls upo
he input of tary objectivehoice to mak
ference in trn it drops low
Concept oDynamic D
ion on detour
where the staal agency. LoMC also coorowing figure
be establishs, especially e and controcarry out th
uld be the inity is not avathe local ageon is complctively for th
d decision mon the law ethe TMC ande of the detoke an inform
ravel time onwer, the deto
of OperationsDetour System
42
r route.
ate agency isocal agenciesrdinates with
outlines the
hed betweenafter hours,
ol the traffichis operationntegration ofailable in theency’s trafficete. Manualis purpose if
aking duringenforcementd other localur system is
med decision.n freeway isur operation
11.5. 60B60B60B60BEsc
1. Preparapublic directiv
2. Informacongesassess decisio
3. Stagingdetour transpoconditioenforce
calation Pro
ation: The TMsafety agencves, county p
ation: Approption periods.the impacts
n making and
g Law Enforcroute. In
ortation ageon returns tement officer
Figure 14
ocedure
MC and law ecies to solic
plans, and reg
priate channe. Traffic cams of congestd accurate in
cement Persthe absence
ency personnto normal. Wrs should be
4. Decision
enforcement it support in
gional plans s
els of commumera and detetion. All staknformation fo
sonnel: Law e of ITS conel should When freewaalerted to be
Support Sy
agencies shon activating should be ava
unication muector informkeholder age
or the motori
enforcementoverage alomonitor detay travel time prepared to
ystem Flow
ould coordinthe dynami
ailable to dec
ust be openedmation shouldencies shoulsts.
t personnel song the arttour operatime drops bo de-escalate
Chart
ate with the c detour sycision maker
d ahead of red be accessed work toge
should be aserial roads, on continuoelow arteria
e detour oper
Concept oDynamic D
local transpstem. This p
rs.
ecurring or noed at regular ether to pro
ssigned to mlaw enforc
ously until tal travel timration.
of OperationsDetour System
43
ortation andplan, agency
on-recurringintervals to
omote sound
monitor eachcement andthe freeway
mes, the law
4. Stagingcontracnecessaand traAgenciethe rou
5. Prepariinformagiving abe usedprivate
6. Detour congesTMC wsystem
7. Implemcoordin
11.6. 61B61B61B61BDe-
1. Openintraffic cases, making
2. Openinall part
11.7. 62B62B62B62BAft
Anytime ththe review review can at the FDOT
11.8. 63B63B63B63BPub
The FederaSeptemberTransportaintermittenManagemeoutreach sconditions. http://ops.f
The basic s
Det
Ide
Ide
Ide
Dev
Det
Det
Eva
More inform
g Maintenanctors shouldary to impleaffic cones ses may also te.
ing Detour Sation on the an alternate d to guide m contractors
Decision: Ttion. The law
will initiate tms, such as tr
mentation Dination with th
-escalation
g Decisions: conditions, ethe TMC wil process.
g Directive: Ticipating ent
ter Action R
he detour is ais to refine tbe held in co
T office in Ja
blic Informa
al Highway A 9, 2004 in ttion Manage
nt or continuont Plan (TMPtrategies to The FHWA p
fhwa.dot.gov
steps outlined
termine the A
ntify Resourc
ntify Partner
ntify Your Ta
velop the Cam
termine Com
termine When
aluate Effecti
mation on pu
nce of Traffbe availabl
ment the deshould be deneed to man
Systems: Thfreeway DM
route choicemotorists and, when neede
he decision w enforcemenhe detour oaffic camera
rective: Thehe TMC will g
Procedure
The decisionessentially wl confirm if
The law enfoities to open
Review
activated, thhe process a
onjunction wiacksonville, F
ation Campa
dministrationthe Federal Rement Area ous lane clos
P) must be deinform thos
provides a guv/wz/info_and
d for develop
Appropriate S
ces
rs
arget Audien
mpaign Mess
munication S
n to Commun
iveness
blic informat
fic (MOT): Fe to deploytour operatio
eployed as nually control
e TMC shouMS upstream e instead of ad should be ed.
to activate nt agency reoperation bas and detect
e law enforguide and dire
n to deactivawhen the free
the conditio
orcement agen the roadway
here should band ensure thith the FDOT
Florida.
aign
n (FHWA) puRegister (69
that occupsures shall coeveloped andse affected buide to Workd_outreach/i
ping a public
Size and Nat
ces
sage(s)
Strategies
nicate
tion campaig
FDOT, local MOT with
on. Portable eeded to pro the detour s
uld initialize of the cong
a compulsorymade availa
a detour is sponsible fo
ased on infoors.
rcement ageect all resour
ate a detour eway travel ons on the fr
ency in coordy.
be an after-that intended T traffic incid
blished the WFR 54562).
pies a locatiomply with thd implementeby the projeck Zone Publicindex.htm.
information
ure of the Ca
n and some e
public worktemporary tchangeable
ovide informsigns based o
the processgestion. The y detour. Portable by the t
based on tr the particu
ormation rec
ency responrces required
route is madtime is lessreeway have
dination with
he-fact reviecommunicatent managem
Work Zone SPer the Rule
ion for morhe rule. For sed. The TMPct of expectec Information
and outreach
ampaign
examples are
ks departmetraffic contrmessage sig
mation, and ton traffic con
s of displayimessage shtable changetransportatio
the type of ular roadway ceived from
nsible for thd for detour a
de based on than the art
e improved t
h the TMC w
ew of the option and coorment (TIM) m
afety and Moe, the Interste than thresignificant pr
P must included work zonn and Outrea
h campaign a
e provided in
Concept oDynamic D
ents, and tol devices tgns, portableto close lanenditions mon
ing appropriould target
eable messagon agencies
segment imin coordinatlocal agenc
he roadwayactivities.
improvementerial travel to support t
ill direct fiel
eration. Therdination is pmeetings, held
obility Rule (tate System ee days androjects, a Tra
de public infone impacts aach Strategie
are:
n Appendix C.
of OperationsDetour System
44
heir privatethat may bee barricades,es or ramps.nitored along
ate travelermotorists in
ge signs mayand/or their
pact due totion with thecies and ITS
y system in
nt in freewaytime. In allhe decision-
d units from
e purpose ofresent. Thisd bi-monthly
(the Rule) onprojects in a
d has eitheransportationormation andnd changing
es located at
.
12
Asandconsecproclocon
. 11B11B11B11BI-95 Ca
a pilot test sd Fuller Warnsidering its ction of I-95ojects will haosures and shnstruction pr
I-95 Wi
I-95 Rig
I-95 Ov
12.1. 64B64B64B64BOpt
Following astudy area,
1. ArteriaLED suThere aadditionprovidinstudy a
2. ArteriatrailblacharactIn additthis opt
Either of thoperating communicasystem.
12.2. 65B65B65B65BStu
The DDS imParkway anroute to I-9routes to trailblazers
1. Urban SBridge.segmen
2. SuburbinterchThis se
3. Rural S2009, other intraffic.
The concep
se Study
study of thisrren Bridge proximity to is the severave a significhifts in traffirojects are ad
dening and R
gid Pavemen
verland Bridg
tions Consid
are the two ty, assuming th
l Dynamic Tb-panels to
are a maximn to the statng flexibility
area, 11 mainli
l Dynamic Mzer and arteters with twotion to the etion to suppo
he two optioand control
ation betwee
udy Area
mplementatind Fuller Wa95 for this dimplement t
s. The study a
Segment: Inc In 2009, thnt has eight p
an Segmentange. In 200gment has th
Segment: Inclthis segmennterchanges
pt layout of a
concept of ohas been se
o I-95 and theral significancant impact ic pattern todjacent to ea
Reconstructio
nt Rehabilitat
ge Replaceme
deration
ypes of dynahere will be fi
Trailblazer Opdisplay actioum three LEic sign panel for displayiine freeway D
Message Sigerial dynamio lines of texexisting freewort the opera
ons would reling the det
en regional T
on study arerren Bridge. detour operathe detour oarea is divide
cludes the pois segment spartial and fu
: Includes th09, this segmhree intercha
ludes the port served a mwithin this s
arterial DMS a
operation dolected. US 1e number of
nt constructioon the traff
o complete thach other and
on - between
tion - betwee
ent - between
mic detour siber optic ne
ption: This oon messages
ED sub panelss. This optionng action mDMS are prop
gn Option: Tic message
xt. This optionway DMS wittion.
quire SunGutour systemTMCs and lo
ea includes US 1 runs pa
ation. There operation. Ted into three
ortion of I-95served a maxull interchang
he portion ofment served anges includi
rtion of I-95 maximum ansegment and
and trailblaze
cument, a po runs parallelanes it servon projects tfic operationhe constructd are program
n Internationa
en SR 9A/I-29
n Atlantic Bo
system optiotwork covera
option consiss and cardinas that may bn may requiressages. In aposed in this
This option csigns. The an provides mhin the stud
ide® softwam. In additioocal agencies
approximatearallel to I-9are several
These ITS demajor segme
5 between thximum averages to be out
f I-95 betwea maximum ng the US 1 i
between Intnual averagethe general
er options ar
ortion of I-95el to I-95 anes in each dithat are plan
ns within thetion activitiesmmed to be c
al Golf Parkw
95 and Atlan
oulevard and
ns that are cage available
sts of a comal directionsbe required tre a higher nuaddition to t option to su
consists of arterial DMS
maximum flexy area, 11 ma
are modificaton, as discuss would also
ely 30 miles95 in the stud
ITS devicesevices are aents where t
he US 1 soutage annual dtfitted for de
een Race Traaverage annnterchange t
ernational Ge daily traffvicinity of th
re shown in F
5 between Intnd may servrection. The
nned over th region. Thes in this sectconstructed
way and SR 9
ntic Boulevar
Fuller Warre
considered toe along the ar
mposite trailbs with arrow to form a coumber of signthe existing upport the op
a combinatS is a smallexibility for infainline freew
tion to integssed earliero be require
s of I-95 betdy area and
s that are dea combinatiothe detour ro
h interchangaily traffic otour operatio
ack Road annual daily trato be outfitte
olf Parkway ic of 73,000he corridor s
Figures 15 thr
Concept oDynamic D
ternational Gve as an alte
reason for she next five yere may be ption. The follin the next f
9A/I-295
rd
en Bridge
o be deployedrterial corrid
blazer sign tand static s
omplete sign ns and has afreeway DM
peration.
ion of arterer size DMS formation dis
way DMS are
rate the funr, the centeed to operat
tween Internis used as t
eployed alonon of arteri
outes are ava
ge and the Fof 140,000 von.
d Philips Higaffic of 116,0ed for detour
and Race Tr0 vehicles. Tserves mostly
rough 22.
of OperationsDetour System
45
Golf Parkwayernate routeelection thisyears. Theseperiodic lanelowing threeive years:
d in the pilotdors too:
hat includessigns panels.assembly inlimitation inS within the
rial dynamicwith 12-14”
ssemination.proposed in
ctionality ofr to centere the signal
national Golfhe alternateg these twoal DMS and
ailable:
uller Warrenehicles. This
ghway south00 vehicles.
r operation.
rack Road. InThere are noy residential
12.3. 66B66B66B66BEsc
1. The TMcollecte
2. The TMFollowelocal ro
3. The TMagencieplans, a
4. The TMmultipleinformadelay. Ishould
5. Appropcongesassess decisio
6. The declaw enfthe detcamera
7. The TMupstreainsteadshould
8. In an apersonnWhen talerted
9. Transpotraffic cto imple
10. The lawand dire
12.4. 67B67B67B67BDe-
1. The TMactivity
2. The deconditio
3. In all caback to
4. The lawentities
12.5. 68B68B68B68BAft
An after acor on a muand convenmanageme
calation Pro
MC detects ted through v
MC should veed by notificaoads.
MC and law enes to solicit sand regional
MC should ase segment oation from thf the travel tbe activated
priate channtion period. Tthe impacts
n making and
cision is madforcement agtour operatioas and detect
MC should initam of the cond of a compulbe made ava
absence of Inel should mthe freeway to be prepar
ortation agecontrol devicement the de
w enforcemenect all resour
-escalation
MC should coy.
cision to deaons, essentia
ases, the TMo normal to su
w enforcemes to open the
ter Action R
ction review sutually agreene all stakehnt (TIM) mee
ocedure
the slow dowarious sourc
erify the infoation to the
nforcement asupport in acplans should
ssess the imr corridor imhe arterial rotime differen and the age
els of commTraffic cames of congestd accurate in
de on the tygency responon based on itors.
tialize the prngestion tail.lsory detour.
ailable by the
TS coverageonitor detoutravel time ired to de-esc
ncies and theces such as petour operati
nt agency rerces required
Procedure
ntinuously m
activate the ally when the
MC should coupport the de
ent agency ine roadway.
Review
should be heed time and dolders at one
etings, held b
wn or congees.
ormation usinlaw enforcem
agencies shoctivating the
be available
pact of congmpacts. This aoad considernce is 20 minncies should
munication mera and detection. All staknformation fo
pe of segmensible for theinformation r
rocess of dis. The messag. Portable ch
e transportat
e along the r operation cis less than calate detour
eir private coportable chanion. Manual o
sponsible ford for detour a
monitor traffi
detour route freeway tra
nfirm if the ecision-maki
n coordinatio
ld with all thday. The FDOe place. Thisi-monthly at
estion on an
ng traffic cament agencie
uld coordinadynamic det to decision m
gestion on thaction shoulded for detouutes betwee continue mo
must be opector informatkeholder age
or the motori
nt impact due particular rreceived from
playing apprge should tarhangeable meion agencies
arterial roadcontinuously arterial trav
r operation.
ontractors shngeable messoperation of t
r the roadwaactivities.
c camera an
e should bevel time is le
conditions ong process.
on with the
e stakeholdeOT traffic incs review can
the FDOT of
ny portion of
meras and des that cont
te with the lotour system.makers.
he freeway ad be immedi
ur as well as n freeway an
onitoring the
ened ahead tion should bencies shoulsts.
ue to congesroadway in com local agen
opriate traverget motoristessage signs and/or their
ds, law enfo until freewa
vel time, the
hould be avasage signs, pthe detour si
ay system in
nd detector i
made basedess than arte
n I-95 have
TMC will dir
ers involved icident manaalso be com
ffice in Jacks
f the I-95. T
detectors tharols the port
ocal transpo. This plan, a
and should cately followeon I-95 to c
nd arterial roe detector inf
of the recbe accessed d work toge
stion – urbanoordination wcies and ITS
eler informatts in giving a may be user private con
orcement anday traffic con
law enforce
ailable to depportable barrigns may be
coordination
nformation f
d on improverial travel tim
improved to
ect field uni
immediately gement team
mbined with tsonville, Flori
Concept oDynamic D
This informa
at are availations of the h
rtation and pgency direct
consider singed by collectcalculate travoadway, thenformation.
urring or noon a continu
ether to pro
n, suburban owith the TMCsystems, su
tion on the fan alternate d to guide mtractors, whe
d transportanditions returement officer
ploy MOT witricades, and trequired.
n with the TM
from the ons
ement in freme.
o return traff
its from all p
after the dem should leathe FDOT traida, if time pe
of OperationsDetour System
52
ation can be
able on I-95.highway and
public safetytives, county
gle segment,ing detectorvel time and
n the detours
on-recurringuous basis toomote sound
or rural. TheC will initiateuch as traffic
reeway DMSroute choice
motorists anden needed.
ation agencyrn to normal.rs should be
h temporarytraffic cones
MC will guide
set of detour
eeway traffic
fic operation
participating
tour activityd this effort
affic incidentermits.
12.6. 69B69B69B69BPre
The prelimplans in Figand arteriaused and pr
The sourceitem list.
Based on tthan the arthe two con
12.7. 70B70B70B70BI-29
In addition loop. This lSR 202/Bunatural rouwith I-95.
I-95 mainliinterchangeAlso, the reongoing freoperation b
eliminary Co
inary cost esgures 15 thrual dynamic mreliminary co
Ta
of this prelim
he preliminarterial dynamncepts.
95/SR 9A L
to previous oop connect
utler Boulevaute of choice
ine has sevees. In additioemaining poreeway manabetween thes
ost Estimate
stimates areu 20. The cosmessage signost estimate
ble 7. Prelim
Device
Arterial Trailb
Arterial DMS
Mainline DM
Total System
minary cost e
ary cost estimmic trailblaze
Loop Alterna
three segmes to all majo
ard, Beach Be to carry ad
eral existingon, there arertion of the Igement syst
se interchang
es and Num
e derived frost estimates . The followiof each optio
inary Cost E
es ArtTra
blazer
S
MS
m Cost $
estimate is F
mates, the aer option. Ap
ate Route C
ents, the othr roadways toulevard, At
dditional traf
freeway DMe several ex-295/SR 9A
tems projectges.
mber of Devic
m the numbeare divided ng table proon.
stimate and
terial Dynamicailblazer Optio
52
‐
11
$7,777,730.26
FDOT historic
rterial DMS pendix D pro
Concept
er alternate that also intetlantic Bouleffic between
MS signs in isting freewa
A loop will sots in Northea
ces Used
er of ITS sysinto the two
ovides the in
Number of D
c n
ArteriaOpt
1
3
1
$11,342
cal bid costs,
option will covides the de
route to I-9ersect with Ivard, Heckscthe south a
advance of ay DMS alonon have maiast Florida. F
stems showno options: artformation on
Devices Used
al DMS tion
17
31
11
2,965.62
, listed in the
ost approximetailed prelim
5 through tr-95 such as cher Drive, eand north I-2
the I-295/Sng the southnline DMS atFigure 21 sh
Concept oDynamic D
n in the detoterial dynamin the numbe
e 12/08/2010
mately $3.6 minary cost
raffic is the II-10, Baymea
etc. Hence, it295/SR 9A i
SR 9A northwest quadrat critical juncows the con
of OperationsDetour System
53
our conceptsic trailblazer
er of devices
0 master pay
million moreestimate for
-295/SR 9Aadows Road,t becomes anterchanges
h and southant of I-295.ctions in thencept detour
I-29
5/SR
9A
A
LTER
NAT
E R
OU
TE
C
ON
CEP
T
SEG
ME
NT:
BE
TW
EE
N I-
295/
SR
9A
NO
RT
H A
ND
SO
UT
H
INT
ER
CH
AN
GE
FIG
UR
E -
21
PAG
E -
54
NOT TO SCALE
I-295/SR 9A SOUTH INTERCHANGE
I-295/SR 9A NORTH INTERCHANGE
SR 9A DETOUR ROUTE
I-295 DETOUR ROUTE
N
13
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
. 12B12B12B12BReferenc
Alternate Rpp. 1-89 (PD
Integrated Federal HigMB).
Integrated Alternative2006 (PDF
Integrated Task 2.3 –I#FHWA-JP
I-75 Corrid2009 (PDF
Integrated 2000 (PDF
Integrated Departmen
Integrated New York M
Integrated (NITTEC) T
. Peeta, Srinusing LimitManagemeReport, pp.
Miller, Mark(Analysis, Mof Californi
. Zhang, WeiCalifornia P1425, pp. 1-
ces
Route HandbDF 3.6 MB).
Corridor Maghway Admin
Corridor Mae Definitions, 67 KB).
Corridor MaICMS Concep
PO-06-032, p
dor Managem 15.4 MB).
Corridor MaF 1.2 MB).
Corridor Trat of Transpo
TransportatiMetropolitan
Corridor Mransportatio
ivas, Hu, Shoted Link Traf
ent Framewor 1-60, Octobe
k A. and SkaModeling, anda, Berkeley,
i-Bin et al., SPath Program-56, Novemb
book, Federa
anagement Anistration pu
anagement Phs, Federal Hi
anagement Copt of Operat
pp. 1-109, Apr
ment Final Con
anagement F
affic Managemrtation, pp. 1
tion and LandTransportat
Management n Operations
ou-Ren, Chu, ffic Counts: S
ork, NexTranser 2009 (PD
bardonis, A.,d Simulation)ISSN 1055-14
Study of Integm, Institute oer 2008 (PD
al Highway A
Analysis, Modblication #F
hase I concepighway Adm
oncept Develtions for a Gil 2006 (PDF
ncept of Ope
Final Evaluat
ment System-136, March 1
d Use Planninion Council, p
Requiremens, pp 1-59, Ja
Chun-Hsiao,Strategic Deps and USDOTF 1.2 MB).
, San Diego In), California P425, pp. 1-63
egrated Corriof TransportF 1.9 MB).
Administratio
deling, and SHWA-JPO-09
ept Developmministration p
elopment and Generic CorridF 1.6 MB).
erations Repo
tion Report,
m (Minnesota 1996 (PDF 8.
ng – Facilitatipp. 1-56, Jan
nts Documenanuary 2010 (
, and Liou, Hployment of VT Region V
I-15 IntegratePath Program
3, March 2010
idor Managemtation Studie
on, Publicatio
Simulation R9-001 EDL 14
ment and Founpublication #
d Foundationaidor, Federal
ort, Michigan
Minnesota D
a Implementa.0 MB).
ting coordinatnuary 2009 (
nt, Niagara (PDF 3.7 MB
an-Tsung. NeVehicle DeteRegional Un
ted Corridor Mm, Institute o0 (PDF 794 K
ment for Sanes, University
on# FHWA-H
Results for th4440, pp. 1-1
undational Re#FHWA-JPO
al Research, Highway Ad
Department
Department
ation) User M
tion across aPDF 1.2 MB).
Internationa).
Network Originectors throug
iversity Tran
Managementof TransportKB).
n Francisco By of Californ
Concept oDynamic D
HOP-06-092,
he Test Corr117, June 200
esearch: Task-06-034, pp
Technical Mdministration
t of Transpor
of Transpor
Manual Repor
and Among P
al Technolog
in-Destinationgh an Integransportation C
t (ICM) Systeation Studies
Bay Area I-8ia, Berkeley,
of OperationsDetour System
55
, May 2006,
ridor Report,08 (PDF 2.0
k 3.1 Developp. 1-10, April
Memorandum,n publication
rtation, June
rtation, April
rt, Minnesota
Practitioners,
gy Coalition
on Estimationated CorridorCenter Final
em: Statge IIs, University
880 Corridor,, ISSN 1055-
p
nr
I
top related