combined phase i desk study and phase ii … floor slab should ... cast in situ floor slab...
Post on 05-May-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
COMBINED PHASE I DESK STUDY AND PHASE II GROUND INVESTIGATION
Station Road Padiham
REL00396/V1.0
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
i
REPORT DETAILS
Reference Report Type Author / Approved Issue Date
REL00396 Phase I & II Report GJS / RS 13‐12‐12
REVISIONS
Revision Details of Revision Initials Date
V1.0 First Issue SL 13‐12‐12
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
ii
Contents Executive Summary 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION & HISTORY 33.0 GEOLOGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 6 4.0 EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION 12 5.0 6.0
GAS MONITORING LABORATORY TESTING & CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT
16 23
7.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 328.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 37 Appendices
I Site Location Plan II Annotated Site Plan III Site Plan Showing General Site Views IV Exploratory Hole Location Plan & Depth of Made Ground V Exploratory Hole Logs VI Laboratory Soil Test Results VII Historical Plans VIII Landmark Envirocheck Report IX Coal Authority Mining Report X Gas Monitoring Results XI Statistical Assessments XII Plates XIII Conditions and Limitations
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ground Conditions Made Ground was encountered across the site to depths ranging between 0.75m to in excess
of 4.65m (TP8). The Made Ground included anthropogenic materials (such as brick, slag, ash etc.) presumably derived from historical uses of the site. Underlying the Made Ground, variable natural strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) ranging from a soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand, was encountered to a maximum proven depth of 7.00m begl.
Foundation Design However, the material currently logged as ‘Possible Reworked Natural Strata’ is typically variable and locally poor in strength and is generally considered to be unsuitable for traditional spread foundations. Therefore, foundation solutions, such as piles or ground improvement (e.g. vibro stone columns or dynamic compaction techniques) are likely to be required for the proposed low rise residential and commercial developments. The advice of suitably competent piling and ground improvement contractors should be sought to determine the feasibility of this option. Further deep boreholes are recommended to prove the depth of competent bedrock and assist with foundation design.
Floor Slabs Commercial Buildings Ground bearing floor slabs will be appropriate for lightly loaded floor slabs where a limited depth of geotechnically competent ground is present (subject to Structural Engineer design taking account of loading characteristics and tolerable settlement). Improvement of the ground by proof rolling of the formation and the inclusion of geotextile reinforcement in capping materials is recommended if ground bearing floor slabs are to be considered. Alternatively, ground floors may be designed as suspended. Residential Dwellings Made Ground has been encountered in excess of 0.60m across the site and therefore a suspended floor slab should be adopted. Suspended floors may be either reinforced concrete cast in‐situ or a pre‐cast concrete suspended floor with a clear ventilated void (i.e. beam and block), although if gas precautions in accordance with NHBC ‘Amber 1’ classification are proposed a beam and block floor will be required. Beam and block floors with a clear void and heave precautions will be required if deepening due to trees in excess of 1.50m depth.
Radon No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensions.
Gas Precautions Residential Priorities with a Suspended Ground Floor (NHBC Classification) In accordance with Table 14.1 of NHBC Guidance the site may be classified as ‘Amber 1’ where the following gas precautions are required assuming that residential properties will have a suspended floor slab (e.g. beam and block): • Provision of a minimum 2000g DPM membrane with all joints and penetrations sealed. • Ventilated sub‐floor void (minimum one complete volume change per 24 hours). • Gas protection measures should be installed as prescribed in BRE Report 414. Consideration may be given to the design of gas precautions in accordance with CIRIA C665 and BS8485: 2007 should alternative foundation / floor slab proposals be considered in residential properties. Commercial Properties (CIRIA C665) In accordance with CIRIA C665, the site may be may be classified as ‘CS2’ for commercial properties as follows: • Reinforced concrete cast in situ floor slab (suspended, non suspended or raft) with at least
1200g DPM.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
iv
• Or alternately, beam and block or pre cast concrete slab and minimum 2000g DPM/reinforced gas membrane.
Building Near Trees Foundations designs will require adjusting when building near existing, recently removed or proposed trees due to the presence of shallow cohesive soils with a medium volume change potential.
Coal Mining No coal mining related investigations or precautions are considered necessary at the site. Water Excavations may locally require dewatering due to the presence of shallow perched
groundwater. Excavations Excavations may require trench support. The requirement for trench support should be
assessed by the groundworks contractor prior to commencing site works. Sulphate Classification Design Sulfate Class DS‐1 and an Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC)
classification of AC‐1. CBRs and Pavements Typical CBR values of less than 2% could be initially anticipated at the site, subject to
confirmation by in‐situ testing. Soakaways The use of soakaway drainage is unlikely to be feasible due to the depth of the Made Ground,
the low permeability clayey soils which underlie the site at shallow depth and the presence of localised very shallow groundwater.
Contamination Assessment The results of the chemical testing undertaken at the site indicate that the individual and UCL concentrations of Arsenic and a number of PAHs in the shallow Made Ground are in excess of their respective Tier 1 SACs and may represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use. The concentrations detected are not considered likely to represent a significant risk to areas of commercial development at the site.
Remediation Proposals Remediation measures are required where residential development (private dwellings and the sheltered accommodation) is proposed at the site as follows: • A capping layer may be imported to site and placed in private gardens (0.60m thickness)
and soft landscaped areas (0.30m thickness) allowing the Made Ground to remain in‐situ where development levels permit.
• Alternatively, the Made Ground may be excavated from gardens and soft landscaped areas
and either removed off site to a licensed waste management facility or reused beneath areas of proposed hard standing.
Further works should be undertaken to establish if the former underground fuel tanks in the west of the site are still present. Validation works should be undertaken in the soils underlying the tanks to confirm if hydrocarbon impaction is present. If hydrocarbon impaction is present remedial works may be required.
Off‐site Disposal The laboratory test results from this investigation should be supplied to landfill operators to determine likely disposal costs where necessary. WAC testing may be required to accurately determine the cost of disposal of soils.
Unforeseen Circumstances Should any areas of potentially contaminated soil be encountered during site construction works, we would recommend consultation with Jackson Purdue Lever to ensure that our recommendations continue to apply.
Construction Workers It is recommended that construction personnel involved with direct contact with the soils at the site use appropriate PPE equipment together with welfare facilities in accordance with general health and safety guidelines.
Utilities We would recommend that this report is supplied to utility companies (including water supply), and that their recommendations relating to appropriate supply pipes are adhered to.
Licenses, Permits, Registrations & Approvals
The Contractor/Developer is responsible for, and must ensure that, all necessary licenses, permits, plans, registrations and approvals are in place prior to commencing with the works at the site.
Statutory Consultation In accordance with normal planning requirements, we would recommend that a copy of our report is issued by the Client to the Local Authority (and NHBC, if necessary) for review/comment and approval prior to commencing with the redevelopment of the site.
Further Works • Further deep shell & auger boreholes to assist in foundation design. • Establish whether underground fuel tanks are still present in the west of the site.
Subsequently, remove tanks (where present), validate underlying soils and remediate as necessary.
• Engineer assessment of retaining walls.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction
Jackson Purdue Lever has been instructed by the Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd to undertake a Combined Phase I Desk Study and Phase II Ground Investigation on the site of Station Road, Padiham.
1.2 Scope of Works The scope of the Desk Study works included the following: • A site walkover. • Review of the sites radon status. • Review of the sites coal mining status. • Review of the sites geology (including hydrology and hydrogeology). • Review of the Landmark Envirocheck Historical Mapping and Environmental Reports relating
to the site.
The scope of the Exploratory Investigation works comprised: • A sub‐contracted service scan of proposed exploratory hole locations. • An exploratory programme of trial pits across the site. • An exploratory programme of window sample boreholes across the site. • A programme of gas monitoring. • Geotechnical and environmental soil testing.
1.3 Project Understanding
We understand that the site will be redeveloped for a mixed end use (all low rise) including residential dwellings, sheltered accommodation and employment units. This understanding has formed the basis of our assessment. Should our understanding prove to be incorrect, it would be necessary to review our comments to ensure that they continue to apply.
1.4 Limitations
The conclusions and recommendations made in this report are limited to those that can be made based on the findings of the investigation. Where comments are made based on information obtained from third parties, Jackson Purdue Lever assumes that all third party information is true and correct. No independent action has been undertaken to validate the findings of third party information, unless specifically stated. This report has been prepared in accordance with our understanding of current best practice. However, new information or legislation, or changes to best practice may necessitate revision of the report after the date of its issue.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
2
Jackson Purdue Lever has prepared this report for the sole use and reliance of the Client, Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd, in accordance with our standard Conditions and Limitations (a copy of which is included as Appendix XIII). This report may not be used or relied upon by any third party without the explicit written agreement of Jackson Purdue Lever.
1.5 Confidentiality
The risk assessment undertaken herein remains the intellectual property and trade secret of Jackson Purdue Lever. The information contained within this report must not be disclosed or divulged to any commercial Consultant or other third party without the prior written agreement of Jackson Purdue Lever.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
3
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION & HISTORY 2.1 Site Description
The site comprises an irregularly shaped plot of land located off Station Road, Padiham. The site may be located centred around approximate Ordnance Survey National Grid Reference 379300E 433600N. The site extends to an approximate area of 2.26 Hectares. At the time of our walkover, the site comprised a vacant parcel of land which was predominantly surfaced with gravel and sporadic grasses / shrubs. An estimated 5‐6m bank vegetated with grass shrubs and trees were located in the south of the site. A stockpile of brick and concrete fragments was located in the southeast corner of the site. The site is sensibly level with the exception of the far eastern area which slopes slightly to moderately downwards the east to a retaining wall (varying from approximately 1m to 4m high). A previous ground investigation report for the site (see Section 3.10) indicates underground fuel tanks were present to the west of the former works building (location not identified). Above ground fuel tanks are also indicated to have been present at the site (location not identified). A pathway (formerly a railway line) is located adjacent to the north of the site. This pathway is generally level with the site with the exception of a section located in the middle of the northern boundary which slopes steeply downwards to the north. Beyond the railway line, to the north, a significant embankment (anticipated to be associated with the former railway line) was observed sloping downwards to the north towards residential housing in the east and a leisure centre in the west. Bridges (formerly from the railway) are located in the west and northeast of the site respectively. Station Road is located to the east of the site, beyond which lies commercial premises. Trees, generally of immature age, are located sporadically across the site. Residential housing is located to the southeast of the site. A school is located to the south of the site and commercial premises are located to the sites southwest. A retaining wall, estimated to be approximately 5m‐6m high, is situated adjacent to the southwest of the site. Open ground and the River Calder is located 40m to the west of the site. A Site Location Plan is included in Appendix I (Figure No. REL00396/01). An Annotated Site Plan is included in Appendix II (Figure No. REL00396/02) and a Plan Showing General Site Views is included in Appendix III (Figure No. REL00396/03).
2.2 Site History Historical and contemporary Ordnance Survey publications dating from 1848 to 2012 were reviewed to obtain relevant historical information for the site. Historical plans are included as Appendix VII. We would note that the boundary marked on the historical sheets within the Envirocheck Report appears to ‘shift’ on several of the maps due to scaling inaccuracies between maps of differing dates. This is a function of Envirocheck transposition algorithms.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
4
TABLE 1 – HISTORICAL PUBLICATION DATA
Date Features on Site Features off Site 1848 • The site is indicated to comprises open fields. • The site is generally surrounded by open fields.
• Green Lane is located to the southeast of the site.
• The River Calder is located 40m to the west of the site.
• The Green Brook is indicated 50m east of the site.
1891 • A part of a platform and waiting rooms, associated with Padiham Railway Station, are indicated at the northern boundary of the site.
• Railway sidings are shown across the site. • A goods shed is shown in the centre if the site. • A travelling crane is shown in the centre of the
site. • A platform is shown in the northeast of the
site. • An embankment, sloping downwards to the
north, is shown in the south of the site. • An embankment, sloping downwards to the
south, encroaches over the southern boundary in the west of the site.
• Small buildings are shown sporadically across the site.
• Padiham Railway Station, including platforms, waiting rooms and a glass roofed structures. Railway line is indicated adjacent to the north of the site. Bridges are indicated at the end of the site to the east and west.
• An embankment is shown to the north of the railway line sloping downwards to the north.
• Station Road is indicated adjacent to the east. • Mills, bobin works, a saw mill and a timber
yard are indicated to the east of the site. • A school is indicated adjacent to the south of
the site. • Regrading works are indicated 5m south of the
site. • Residential housing is shown 10m south of the
site. • Regrading works associated with a gas works
are indicated from 20m south of the site. • A church is indicated 40m south of the site. • A gasometer is indicated 110m south of the
site. 1912 • The layout of the railway sidings has been
revised at the site. • The regrading works associated with the gas
works is no longer shown. Buildings are shown on the site of the gas works. The gas works is indicated to be adjacent to the south of the site.
• A refuse destructor is shown 160m southwest of the site.
• A skating rink is shown 50m north of the site. 1931 • A tramway appears to link the site and the gas
works to the south. • An additional gasometer, further buildings,
tanks and a chimney are shown at the gas works to the south.
• A bowling green and tennis ground are located from 60m north of the site.
• Allotment gardens are indicated 100m south of the site.
• A mortuary is shown 150m southwest. 1958 • The layout of the small buildings and platform
in the northeast of the site has been revised. • A subway is shown to encroach slightly over
the central part of the sites northern boundary.
• The surrounding land appears essentially unchanged.
1968 • Padiham Station is no longer indicated. The station building and platform appear to have been partially removed.
• The site is labelled as ‘Coal Sidings’.
• A building formally located in the centre of the gas works is no longer shown.
• A conveyor is shown in the centre of the site. • A ‘Public Baths’ is shown 50m north of the site.
1978 • The railway sidings are no longer shown. • A ‘Mineral Railway’ is indicated adjacent to the
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
5
TABLE 1 – HISTORICAL PUBLICATION DATA
Date Features on Site Features off Site • The site has been redeveloped with a large
‘works’. • Buildings are shown in the south of the site. • Car parking is shown in the south o the site • A tank is indicated in the north of the site. • The embankment is no longer shown in the
west of the site.
north of the site.
1990 • An additional building is shown in the centre of the site.
•
• A commercial building is indicated 10m south of the site on the gas works.
1993‐1994
• The site appears essentially unchanged. • The school to the south of the site is no longer shown.
• The gas works is generally no longer shown although several buildings remain.
• A ‘Household Waste Disposal Centre’ is shown 90m south of the site.
• A breakers yard is indicated 50m south of the site.
2006 • The site appears essentially unchanged. • The railway is indicated to be dismantled. • A school us shown 30mcsouth of the site.
2012 • The site is shown as a vacant parcel of land. • The surrounding land appears essentially unchanged.
The earliest mapping of 1848 indicates the topography of the site prior to regrading works undertaken during the construction of Padiham Railway Station. The map indicates that originally the site sloped downwards from the southern tip of the site (indicated to be close to the top of a hill) towards the River Calder which bends around the site to the west / north and Green Brook to the east. The western tip and the northeast of the site were indicated to be at approximately level of the river plain. The later 1:2500 scale mapping indicates that the site is approximately 8m AOD (taken from the bridge adjacent to the site) and the land surrounding the site to the north and south of its western tip is approximately 76m AOD, potentially indicating that significant depths of Made Ground may be present in this area of the site. Site levels also indicate that similar depths of Made Ground may also be present in the northeast of the site.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
6
3.0 GEOLOGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.1 References
The following geological publications were referred to: • British Geological Society (BGS) 1:50,000 Series Sheet 125, ‘Clitheroe’ (1960), Solid and Drift
Edition. • BGS 1:10,560 Series, Sheet SD 73 SE (1963), Solid and Drift Edition. • BGS ‘Geology of the Country around Clitheroe and Nelson’ (1961). • The Coal Authority and The Law Society publication ‘Coal Mining and Brine Subsidence Claim
Searches ‐ Directory and Guidance’, Sixth Edition (2006).
3.2 Geology The northern area of the site is indicated to be underlain by Alluvium, dating from the Recent and Pleistocene Period. Alluvium is typically encountered as a soft to firm unconsolidated, compressible silty clay, with layers of silt, sand, peat and basal gravel. The remaining area of the site to the south is indicated to be underlain by Boulder Clay (now Classified as Glacial Till), dating from the Recent and Pleistocene Period. The memoir indicates that the ‘Boulder Clay consist of rounded and subangular scratched stones enclosed in a matrix which varies from impermeable stiff grey brown or occasionally reddish clay to porous brown, ochreous or occasional reddish clayey gravel. In nearly every section of stiff boulder clay there abound smoothed, scratched boulders of limestone as well as angular fragments of dark chert. In the more sandy types of boulder clay the dominant boulders are of sandstone and gritstone with, in addition, fragments of dark chert and often small pieces of ironstone, shale and coal’. Underlying the above superficial deposits, undifferentiated Permian Lower Coal Measures is indicated, dating from the Carboniferous Period. Glacial Till is typically encountered as a grey mudstone, siltstone and pale grey interbedded with sandstone. Coal seams are common in upper part and mudstones with marine fossils (marine bands) are present in lower part. Immediately to the west, and underlying the Boulder Clay, Dandy Rock is indicated dating from the Carboniferous Period and part of the Lower Coal Measures. No description of the Dandy rock was available in the BGS memoir or the BGS on line database. However, the Dandy Rock is understood to comprise Sandstone from the Lower Coal Measures series.
3.3 Faults
A fault is indicated immediately to the west of the site, oriented in the northwest / southeast direction and downthrown to the northeast (marking the boundary of the Permian Lower Coal Measures and the Dandy Rock).
3.4 Made Ground No Made Ground is indicated on the site. However, Made Ground is indicated immediately to the north of the site and described as ‘mainly road, railway embankments, quarry spoil and industrial areas’.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
7
3.5 Hydrogeology Groundwater Vulnerability The Superficial & Bedrock Aquifer designation for the site is indicated to be ‘Secondary A’. This is described by the Environment Agency as ‘permeable layers capable of supporting water supplies at a local rather than strategic scale, and in some cases forming an important source of base flow to rivers. These are generally aquifers formerly classified as minor aquifers’. Source Protection Zones The Landmark Envirocheck Report does not identify any Source Protection Zones (SPZs) on or within 250m of the site.
3.6 Hydrology
Flood Risk The Landmark Envirocheck Report does not identify the site to be located within an area of flooding or extreme flooding from rivers or sea without defences. Areas of flooding and extreme flooding from rivers or sea without defences are located from 13m and 7m distance of the site respectively. However, the site is noted to be significantly elevated in relation to the River Calder to the west. Surface Water Features The River Calder is indicated 44m to the west of the site and the Green Brook is indicated 50m east of the site.
3.7 Coal Mining The site lies within an area requiring the commission of a Coal Mining Report in accordance with The Coal Authority and The Law Society publication ‘Coal Mining and Brine Subsidence Claim Searches – Directory and Guidance’, Sixth Edition (2006). A Coal Mining Report has therefore been obtained. A copy of the report is included as Appendix IX. The report makes the following salient comments: • The property is in the likely zone of influence from workings in 1 seam of coal at 100m to
110m depth, and last worked in 1887. Any ground movement from these coal workings should have stopped by now.
• The property is not in the likely zone of influence of any present underground coal workings. • There are no known coal mine entries within, or within 20 metres of, the boundary of the • property. • The property is not within the boundary of an opencast site from which coal has been
removed by opencast methods. Based on the findings of the Coal Mining Report no specific investigation or mitigation measures in relation to coal mining issues are considered necessary for the proposed development.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
8
3.8 Radon The Landmark Envirocheck Report notes that ‘The property is not in a radon affected area, as less than 1% of homes are above the action level’. The report concludes that ‘No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensions’.
3.9 Landmark Envirocheck Report
A Landmark Envirocheck Report has been commissioned for the site. A full copy of the report is included as Appendix VIII. The key issues identified by the Landmark Envirocheck Report are summarised below. Agency & Hydrological Sixteen Discharge Consents generally pertaining to the release of ‘Public Sewage: Storm Sewage Overflow’ to a stream/river are indicated from 89m distance of the site. A single Local Authority Pollution Prevention & Controls entry is recorded at the site. This pertains to EJ Riley Ltd (the former occupier of the site) and is associated with wood coating (permit date 1996 now revoked). Two further Local Authority Pollution Prevention & Controls entries are located within 92m of the site pertaining mobile screening and crushing processes 92m southwest. A single Pollution Incident to Controlled Waters entry is recorded at the site. This pertains to the release of oil to the River Calder (Category 2 Significant Incident) in 1991. The ‘Property Type’ and the ‘Location’ of the incident are not supplied. However, the position of the spillage is indicated where underground fuel storage tanks are understood to have been located. Twenty eight further Pollution Incident to Controlled Waters entries are located within 250m of the site from a minimum distance of 40m northeast. A Prosecution Relating to Authorised Processes (failure to store and control waste) is located 172m north of the site and Prosecution Relating to A Prosecution Relating to Controlled Waters Processes (allowing harmful waste to enter a watercourse) The River Quality of the Green Brook (entry indicated on site although River actually situated approximately 50m east) is indicated by the Environment agency to be GQA Grade B (good). The River Quality of the River Calder (entry indicated 15m west of site although River actually situated approximately 40m west) is indicated by the Environment agency to be GQA Grade D (fair). A Substantiated Pollution Incident Register entry is indicated 210m southeast of the site associated with the release of crude swage in 2004. Two surface water abstractions are located approximately 460m southeast of the site for use in a manufacturing process as cooling water. A groundwater abstraction is indicated 480m southeast of the site detailed as ‘other industrial / commercial / public services: general use (medium loss)’. Two registered Waste Transfer sites (one superseded and one operational) are indicated 137m southwest of the site. A Registered Waste Treatment Site (operational) is recorded 99m southwest of the site.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
9
No other Agency & Hydrological issues that have not been addressed previously have been identified. Waste
Three Historical Landfills are located within 250m radius of the boundary of the site. These entries pertain to Padiham Power Station 97m southwest (deposited waste included inert, indusial and household waste), a British Gas Holder Station 97m southwest (deposited waste included inert waste) and Elizabeth Street 178m southwest (deposited waste included unknown material). Four Licensed Management Facilities (Locations) are indicated from 47m east of the site and identified as a ‘waste transfer station’, ‘vehicle depollution facility’, ‘vehicle dismantlers’ and ‘household waste amenity site’. A registered Landfill Site (permit dated 1987 now lapsed) is recorded 137m southwest of the site associated with the British Gas Holder Station (also listed as the Historical Landfill 97m southwest of the site). The site is indicated to have accepted cement, ceramics, glass, non hazardous metals, slate, concrete, brick, soils, rock, clay, natural sand, solid fully‐polymerised plastics and timber. Hazardous Substances No hazardous substance issues are identified on or within 250m of the site. Geological The Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards is identified as Moderate. There are no other geological issues identified in the Envirocheck Report that are considered likely to have a potential significant adverse effect on the site. Industrial Land Use
Twenty nine Contemporary Trade Directory entries are identified within 250m of the site from a
minimum distance of 31m west.
Sensitive Land Uses
There are no Sensitive Land Use issues identified in the Envirocheck Report that are considered likely to have a potential significant adverse effect on the site.
3.10 Previous Site Investigation Works
Thomas Consulting previously produced a ‘Phase I Contaminated Land Desk Study’ dated 14th February 2007, including a review of initial boreholes advanced by Mini Soils Surveys in 2006. The Desk Study confirmed the following: • ‘The site is currently a disused warehouse with associated hardstanding’. • ‘Geology confirmed as Made Ground underlain by sandy clay’. • ‘Site was formerly railway sidings with goods shed, then developed into a works most recently
occupied by snooker table manufacturer’.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
10
• Underground fuel tanks are indicated to have been present to the west of the former works building (location not identified). Above ground fuel tanks are also indicated to have been present at the site (location not identified).
• The reports indicate ‘chemical analysis identified elevated concentrations of PAH and TPH’. The report includes a table which summarises the most significant contaminant analysis results’. These concentrations of TPH in the table ranged between 750mg/kg (diesel range and 13,000mg/kg (mineral range). The analysis also indicated that ‘the inorganic contaminants were present in concentrations below their published soil guideline values’.
• Made Ground was encountered up to depths of 3.50m begl in BH1 in the west of the site. Suspected Made Ground was encountered up to 3.80m begl in the northwest of the site. Made Ground was encountered to depths less than 2.00m begl in the boreholes advanced in the remaining area of the site.
3.11 Land Use Assessment
As part of the land use assessment, reference has been made to the ‘Desk Reference Guide to potentially Contaminative Land Uses’ produced by Mr P Syms and published jointly by the ISVA (The Professional Society for Valuers and Auctioneers) in association with The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH). We have also made reference to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency Contaminated Land Report CLR8 ‘Potential Contaminants for the Assessment of Land’ (March 2002). This document identifies key contaminants which may potentially be present at a site as a result of a given historical land use and whilst formally withdrawn is considered to represent a useful reference document.
3.11.1 On Site Assessment The Phase I Desk Study searches indicate that the site comprised open fields until its development as a Padiham Railway Station in the late 1800s. The Station included, sidings, goods sheds, tramway, waiting rooms and platforms. Embankments are shown in the west (no longer present) and the south of the site. The land use continued until the late 1970s when the site was developed as a works. Uses of this building included the manufacture of snooker tables and cues. Underground fuel storage tanks are indicated in the west of the site. Above ground fuel tanks are also indicated to have been located elsewhere although there exact location is unclear. The works has been demolished and the site was observed to generally comprise a vacant parcel of land with no above ground structures visible during the site walkover. Based on published guidance, the age of the historical uses and our experience of similar sites the following key contaminants of concern may be present at the site: • Metals and metalloids associated with any Made Ground. • Natural Metal Enrichment (NME) in Natural Strata. • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in any Made Ground. • Hydrocarbons associated with the historical use and storage of fuel/oil at the site. • Acid/Sulphate contaminated soils.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
11
3.11.2 Off Site Assessment The Phase I Desk Study indicates that the area to the north of the site comprised Padiham Railway Station and associated railway line. A former railway embankment is indicated to the sites north. A former gas works is indicated adjacent to the south of the site. Three landfills are identified from within a 250m radius of the site (arbitrary theoretical influencing distance). Therefore, potential off site sources of contamination may include migration or importation of contamination from the adjacent gas works or the migration of ground gas from the areas of Made Ground and landfills located within 250m of the site.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
12
4.0 EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION 4.1 Introduction
Sub‐Surface Utility Avoidance Scan Prior to the commencement of our intrusive works at the site a sub‐contracted sub‐surface utility scan of proposed exploratory hole locations was undertaken to attempt to avoid buried services. Based on the results of the service scan, the exploratory holes were positioned in accessible areas of the site in order to maximise the amount of information obtained during our site works, whilst avoiding known utilities. Trial Pits Trial Pits were advanced at the site on 25th and 26th November 2012 to obtain visually representative soil samples for subsequent soils testing. A total of 14No. Trial pits (designated TP1 to TP14) were advanced at the site to depths ranging between 1.00m and 4.65m begl. Window Sample Boreholes Trial Pits were advanced at the site on 26th November 2012 to obtain visually representative soil samples for subsequent soils testing. A total of 8No. Window samples (designated WS1 to WS8) were advanced at the site to depths ranging between 1.00m and 7.00m begl. A plan (Figure No. REL00396/04) indicating the approximate locations of the exploratory holes at the site is included in Appendix IV, exploratory hole logs for the site are included as Appendix V. General views of trial pits and arisings are shown on the Plates included in Appendix XII.
4.2 Ground Conditions
The following section discusses the ground conditions encountered in the exploratory holes at the site.
4.2.1 Made Ground Topsoil Topsoil was encountered in a single exploratory hole (WS4) and comprised dark brown sandy clayey topsoil 0.40m begl.
4.2.2 Made Ground (General)
Made Ground (not including the above Made Ground Topsoil) was encountered in all of the twenty two exploratory holes. The shallow Made Ground contains a significant proportion of anthropogenic materials and thus the identification of this material is relatively straightforward. However, given that the off site ground levels are significantly lower to the west, north and east, greater depths of Made Ground may be present from on site historical site regrading activities.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
13
These works may have involved the excavation and decrease in original site levels to the sites south via the excavation of the north side of the hill and the placement of materials in the north, west and possibly east of the site to create the relatively level topography observed during the site walkover. However, ‘re‐engineered materials typically comprising reworked natural strata and can be difficult to differentiate from in situ natural strata. Consequently, the depth of the Made Ground / Reworked Natural Strata indicated on the logs is considered tentative at this stage. Made Ground (Anthropogenic Inclusions) The shallow Made Ground where anthropogenic inclusions were encountered typically comprised a locally cobbly sandy gravel to gravelly clay (gravel includes, slag, ash, brick, sandstone, concrete, ceramics, mudstone, flint, limestone and coal) to depths of between 0.75m and in excess of 4.65m begl. Natural Strata (Possibly Reworked) Due to the regrading works previously undertaken at the site the strata underlying the above Made Ground has been assumed to comprise Possible Reworked Natural Strata based on the information currently available. This strata ranged from a soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay (locally with mudstone and sandstone boulders) to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand (gravel is fine to coarse subangular to subrounded mudstone, sandstone and flint) to a maximum proven depths of 7.00m begl. Furthermore, localised peaty soils were encountered and running sand. Two exploratory holes encountered in the south of the site (WS2 & TP2) were observed to include gravelly strata to a depth of 2.10m in WS2 and in excess of 4.00m in TP2. A silty sandy peat was encountered in WS5 between 6.90m and 7.00m begl (borehole terminated at 7.00m).
4.2.3 Visual & Olfactory Evidence of Hydrocarbon Contamination
Visual and olfactory evidence of significant soil contamination was encountered during the advancement of two of the exploratory holes at the site as follows: • TP1 1.10m to 2.10m – moderate hydrocarbon / tar odour and metallic sheen. • WS2 2.00m to 3.95m – slight to moderate hydrocarbon odour.
4.3 Summary
The findings from the exploratory holes are summarised in Table 2.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
14
TABLE 2 – SUMMARY OF EXPLORATORY HOLE FINDINGS
Stratum
Exploratory Holes Encountered
Depth to Base of Stratum (m begl)
Description
TOPSOIL MADE GROUND WS4 0.40 Dark brown sandy clayey topsoil MADE GROUND
(ANTHROPOGENIC INCLUSIONS)
All exploratory holes 0.75‐4.65+ Locally cobbly sandy gravel to gravel clay
NATURAL STRATA (POSSIBLY REWORKED /
DISTURBED)
All exploratory holes TBC Soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay (locally with mudstone and sandstone boulders) to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand.
4.4 Water
Water was encountered during the advancement of nine of the twenty two exploratory holes as a slight seepage at depths ranging between 0.60 and 3.30m begl. The depth of the groundwater, as indicated during the four groundwater monitoring visits, varied between 0.51m and 2.34m begl.
4.5 Stability and Excavations The sides of eight of the exploratory holes were observed to be unstable, particularly when encountering wet granular soils, although frequently only a partial collapse of the pits was encountered.
4.6 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Data
SPT testing was undertaken in the Made Ground and Possible Reworked Natural Strata in seven of the eight boreholes. The SPT values ranged between 4 and 50 (i.e. refusal) indicating highly variable ground conditions prevail at the site. The results also indicate that firm clay was present at depth in boreholes WS5, WS7 and WS8.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
15
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
16
5.0 GROUND GAS & WATER MONITORING 5.1 Introduction
The Phase I Desk Study information has identified several former landfills and Made Ground within potential influencing distance of the site. These features represent a possible source of potentially hazardous ground gases (i.e. Methane and Carbon Dioxide). A total of 5No. window sample boreholes have been installed with combined ground gas and groundwater monitoring wells during previous works (WS2, WS4, WS5, WS7 and WS8). Following the recent installation of monitoring wells, four weekly visits were made to the site to monitor gas levels in the 5No. wells on the site. The findings of all available ground gas monitoring visits have been included in the following assessment.
5.2 Results of the Gas Monitoring
Gas monitoring results are presented in Appendix X and summarised in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3 – SUMMARY OF GAS MONITORING DATA
Parameter Minimum % by volume (v/v) Maximum % by volume (v/v)
Methane 0.0 0.0 Carbon Dioxide 0.0 5.8
Oxygen 12.8 20.8 Flow (l/h) 0.0 0.0
• Measurable levels of Methane were not recorded in the monitoring wells during the monitoring visits.
• Carbon Dioxide was encountered in all boreholes up to a maximum concentration of 5.8% by
volume (v/v).
• Oxygen was encountered at concentrations fluctuating between 12.8% v/v and 20.8% v/v. • Measurable flow rates were not recorded in the boreholes during the monitoring undertaken.
• Groundwater level monitoring has revealed groundwater levels at depths ranging between
0.51m and 2.34m begl.
• Barometric pressure ranged between 971mb and 1000mb during the monitoring visits. 5.3 Appropriate Guidance
The results of the gas monitoring have been reviewed with reference to the following documentation: • CIRIA Report C665 ‘Assessing risks posed by hazardous ground gases to buildings’ (2007).
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
17
• NHBC & RSK Group publication ‘Guidance on evaluation of development proposals on sites where methane and carbon dioxide are present’ (March 2007).
CIRIA Report C665 recommends a risk‐based methodology to ground gas assessment, which includes the calculation of a site‐specific Gas Screening Value (GSV). The GSV of a particular ground gas regime equates to: GSV (l/hr) = maximum borehole flow rate (l/hr) x maximum gas concentration (expressed as a fraction). The GSV should be used to assess the risks posed by gassing sites for both residential and commercial/industrial developments. CIRIA Report C665 presents a total of six Characteristic Situations (CS) to assist with the relevant ground gas protection measures that should be installed to mitigate the risk posed by ground gases for a residential building and commercial/industrial developments. The CS classifications represent a revised approach to the CS tables detailed within CIRA 149 ‘Protecting development from methane’. The NHBC has developed a system of ‘Traffic Lights’ to characterise gassing sites, which is specific to low‐rise residential developments. Classification of the Traffic Lights provides the relevant ground gas protection measures that should be installed to mitigate the risk posed by ground gases for a low‐rise residential development with a suspended floor slab. The Traffic Light approach is based on ‘Typical Maximum Concentrations’ of Methane and Carbon Dioxide for initial screening purposes. Table 8.5 (below) is reproduced from CIRIA C665 which indicates how a Characteristic Situation is determined.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
18
Table 8.6 (below) is also reproduced from CIRIA C665 which details typical protection measures associated with each Characteristic Situation.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
19
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
20
Tables 14.1 and 14.2 from the NHBC guidance are reproduced below.
The GSV should be calculated for both Methane and Carbon Dioxide and the worst case adopted in order to establish the appropriate protection measures for the site. The higher the classification the greater the risk posed by the presence of ground gas. Both the above guidance documents note that ‘…the GSV is a guideline value and not an absolute threshold’.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
21
5.4 Ground Gas Analysis
Methane No measurable concentrations of Methane were recorded during the programme of ground gas monitoring and therefore Methane is considered not a significant risk to the proposed development. Consequently, no ground gas assessment has been undertaken for Methane. Carbon Dioxide The programme of ground gas monitoring detected Carbon Dioxide up to a maximum concentration of 5.8% v/v (expressed as 0.058 as a fraction) with no measurable flow rate detected. As no flow rate was recorded during the monitoring visits the gas monitors limit of detection for flow (0.1l/hr) will be utilised for calculating the GSV.
The maximum GSV for Carbon Dioxide is calculated as follows: • 0.058 x 0.1 = 0.0058l/h
5.5 Ground Gas Precautions
The following two classifications are provided for residential and commercial properties respectively: Residential Priorities with a Suspended Ground Floor (NHBC Classification) In accordance with Table 14.1 of NHBC Guidance the site may be classified as ‘Amber 1’ where the following gas precautions are required assuming that residential properties will have a suspended floor slab (e.g. beam and block): • Provision of a minimum 2000g DPM membrane with all joints and penetrations sealed. • Ventilated sub‐floor void (minimum one complete volume change per 24 hours). • Gas protection measures should be installed as prescribed in BRE Report 414. Consideration may be given to the design of gas precautions in accordance with CIRIA C665 and BS8485: 2007 should alternative foundation / floor slab proposals be considered in residential properties. Commercial Properties (CIRIA C665)
In accordance with CIRIA C665, the site may be may be classified as ‘CS2’ for commercial properties as follows:
• Reinforced concrete cast in situ floor slab (suspended, non suspended or raft) with at least
1200g DPM.
• Or alternately, bean and block or pre cast concrete slab and minimum 2000g DPM/reinforced gas membrane.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
22
The recommendations also include possible underfloor venting but it is considered unnecessary in this instance due to the absence of measurable gas flow, the absence of methane and the relatively low concentrations of CO2 recorded.
All joints and penetrations should be sealed.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
23
6.0 LABORATORY TESTING & CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT 6.1 Introduction
The following environmental soil testing was carried out on visually representative samples recovered from the exploratory holes to provide a general indication of the contamination status of the site:
• 12No. Standard contamination suites (including speciated PAH and TOC). • 12No. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (criteria working group methodology) (TPH). • Asbestos Screen.
Geotechnical soil testing comprised the following:
• 5No. Plasticity Index (PI) tests. • 10No. Water soluble sulphate tests. • 18No. pH tests. The environmental and geotechnical laboratory soil test results are presented in Appendix VI of this report.
6.2 Geotechnical Soil Test Results Water Soluble Sulphate/pH
Water soluble sulphate testing was undertaken on 4No. samples of Natural Strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) and revealed concentrations of <0.01g/l to 0.17g/l SO4. The pH values of the soil samples analysed ranged between 7.09 and 9.63. Adopting the highest concentration of water soluble sulphate (0.17g/l), and the mean of the lowest two measured pH values (7.46), in accordance with the Building Research Establishment publication Special Digest 1 ‘Concrete in Aggressive Ground’ (2005) the site falls into Design Sulphate Class DS‐1 and an Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC) classification of AC‐1. The foregoing designation assumes a brownfield location and potentially mobile groundwater conditions (due to the presence of water in the trial pits and groundwater monitoring wells).
Plasticity Index Testing Plasticity Index (PI) testing was undertaken on 5No. selected samples of visually Natural Strata (possibly reworked / disturbed). In accordance with NHBC 4.2‐D5(b) the reported PI value may be modified based on the portion of the sample retained on the 425µm sieve. The results of the PI analysis are summarised in Table 4.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
24
TABLE 4 – SUMMARY OF PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) DATA
Sample Ref. Reported PI Value (%)
Portion Passing 425µm Sieve
Modified PI Value (%)
Volume Change Potential
TP1 1.00 33 100 33 Medium TP12 3.30‐3.60 Non Plastic NA NA Non Plastic WS4 2.30‐2.80 24 87 21 MediumWS5 2.80‐3.20 19 96 18 Low WS7 1.50‐2.00 17 86 15 Low
In accordance with NHBC Chapter 4.2, the adjusted PI values reveal that the Natural Strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) may be typically regarded as having a medium volume change potential. The results indict that the wet silty clayey fine to medium sand collected from TP12 is not non plastic.
6.3 Contamination Assessment Rationale
It is understood that it is proposed to redevelop the site with residential dwellings, sheltered accommodation and commercial units. The assessment of contamination test results has been undertaken adopting the Tier 1 SACs for both residential and commercial receptors (which have different SACs due to the variable sensitivity of the end use).
6.4 Appropriate Guidance
Reference has been made to documents reflecting current best practice, including (but not limited to) the following:
• Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Environment Agency
publication – ‘Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) model’ (March 2002). • R & D Publication SGV 10 (Lead). • Environment Agency Science Report, ‘Using Soil Guideline Values’, SC050021/SGV, March
2009. • Environment Agency Science Reports Arsenic SGV (May 2009), Nickel SGV, Mercury SGV,
Selenium SGV, Benzene SGV, Toluene SGV, Ethylbenzene SGV, Xylene SGV (all March 2009), Phenol and Cadmium (June 2009).
• R & D Draft Technical Report P5‐079/TR1 ‘Review of the Fate and Transport of Selected Contaminants in the Soil Environment’ dated 2003.
• Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) and Land Quality Management (LQM) publication ‘Generic Assessment Criteria for Human Health Risk Assessment’ 2nd Edition, July 2009, ISBN 0‐9547474‐7‐X.
• CL:AIRE/CIEH ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration’ (May 2008).
• Environment Agency Science Report SC050021/SR7 ‘Compilation of Data for Priority Organic Pollutants for Derivation of Soil Guideline Values’, dated November 2008, ISBN 978‐84432‐964‐9.
• Environment Agency Science Report Final SC050021/SR2 ‘Human health toxicological assessment of contaminants in soil’, dated January 2009, ISBN 978‐84432‐858‐1.
• Environment Agency Science Report SC050021/SR3 ‘Updated technical background to the CLEA model’, dated January 2009, ISBN 978‐84432‐856‐7.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
25
6.4.1 Selection of Appropriate Tier 1 Screening Values
The assessment of contaminated land in the UK was historically undertaken with reference to ICRCL Guidance Note 59/83 together with successive versions of the CLEA model (inc. CLEA2002 (2002), CLEA UK (2005), CLEA V1.03 beta (2008), CLEA V1.04 (January 2009), CLEA V1.05 (September 2009) and CLEA V1.06 (October 2009)). The CLEA V1.06 model is a deterministic quantitative risk assessment (QRA) model which is proposed to be used to derive revised Soil Guideline Values (SGVs) for a range of contaminants. To date, CLEA derived SGVs have been published for the following contaminants: Arsenic, Cadmium, Nickel, Mercury, Selenium, Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene, Phenol, dioxins and furans. SGVs are derived adopting a Sandy Loam soil with 6% Soil Organic Matter (SOM). In accordance with general industry best practice, these published generic CLEA SGVs have been referred to in the first instance (where available) and have been adopted at Tier 1 level. Whilst the CLEA 2002 model has been formally withdrawn, the model currently provides the only publicly available Lead model adopted as UK policy/practice, consequently, the original SGV for Lead is retained herein. In the absence of published SGVs, Jackson Purdue Lever has adopted Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC) derived by CIEH/LQM. These are based on CLEA V1.06 final. The CIEH’s Howard Price has previously stated “This is a fantastic result and a great tribute to Paul and the LQM team, along with the volunteers who helped crunch the numbers. It’s a very good example of cross sector help, and frankly puts the official SGV programme to shame again. We expect that these values will quickly become the numbers of choice in both the public and private sectors. Relevant, appropriate, authoritative and scientifically‐based, they can be used with confidence and employed properly, we believe they will meet an important need in the risk assessment process” (Contaminated Land Bulletin August 2009). Taking account of the foregoing, we consider that industry best practice is currently best represented by CIEH/LQM GAC together with new SGV values and these have been adopted herein. The level of GAC selected for organic determinants is partially dependant upon Soil Organic Matter (SOM) content, with GAC values being available at 1%, 2.5% and 6% SOM as standard. In the following sections, all the Tier 1 assessment criteria have been collectively referred to as ‘Site Acceptance Criteria’ (SAC). The SAC adopted herein, assessed as a residential end use, are presented on the statistical assessment sheets presented in Appendix XI.
6.4.2 Site‐Specific Considerations The following site‐specific condition has been considered, at Tier 1 level, with respect to the soils at the site (as appropriate): • Soil Organic Matter (SOM) content.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
26
The SOM content and soil type are used to provide an assessment of the applicability of the Tier 1 SAC adopted (the CLEA SGV are based on the default assumption of a UK Sandy Loam soil with 6% SOM, whilst the LQM GAC values are based upon SOM of 1%, 2.5% and 6%, as applicable). Determinants have in the first instance, been compared to standard CLEA SGVs together with CIEH/LQM GAC (adopting a conservative SOM of 1%). For BTEX determinants, Jackson Purdue Lever has utilised CLEA V1.04 final to derive SGVs relevant to 1% and 2.5% SOM. Where the determinant exceeds the relevant SAC at 1% SOM, a site specific SOM may be adopted as appropriate to derive new GAC and the dataset reassessed.
6.5 Statistical Considerations
Statistical tests relating to contaminated land, typically referred to as a Mean and Maximum Value Tests, were detailed in Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and The Environment Agency publication CLR 7 ‘Assessment of Risks to Human Health From Land Contamination: An Overview of the Development of Soil Guideline Values and Related Research’, dated 2002, ISBN 1‐857‐05732‐5. This guidance was superseded by publication of CL:AIRE/CIEH ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration dated May 2008.
6.5.1 Null and Alternative Hypothesis
In consideration of statistical guidance jointly published by CL:AIRE/CIEH ‘Guidance on Comparing Soil Contamination Data with a Critical Concentration’, statistical convention requires consideration of the Null Hypothesis (expressed as Ho) or an Alternative Hypothesis (expressed as H1). Appropriate statistical tests are then applied to the data to assess whether the strength of evidence favours the Null or the Alternative Hypothesis. For the purpose of the following contamination assessments and in accordance with the CL:AIRE/CIEH guidance the key question for the site is as follows. Question ‐ ‘Is there sufficient evidence that the true mean concentration of a contaminant in soil (μ) is less than some critical concentration (Cc)?’ The Null and Alternative hypotheses are therefore defined as follows. The Null Hypothesis (Ho)
μ ≥ Cc (i.e. Tier 1 or 2 Assessment Criteria). The Alternative Hypothesis (H1) (the question the selected statistical test is designed to answer) μ < Cc (i.e. Tier 1 or 2 Assessment Criteria).
6.5.2 95th Percentile Upper Confidence Level Mean Values
The selected relevant statistical assessment undertaken to evaluate the Null and Alternative Hypotheses requires consideration of the 95th Percentile Upper Confidence Level Mean value (this is abbreviated as the UCL). The UCL value takes account the number of samples tested, the data set mean and the standard deviation of the data set and applies a correction factor to take account of the uncertainty of the data set.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
27
CL:AIRE/CIEH guidance states that ‘since the 95% UCL is at most times greater than the true population mean, it follows that if the 95% UCL is less than Cc, the assessor will know (with a defined high level of confidence) that the true population mean (μ, the value which is not known) is also likely to be less than Cc’.
6.5.3 Considerations for Appropriate Dataset(s)
The CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance requires consideration of the appropriateness of the dataset being subjected to the statistical testing and notes the following three key elements to be considered. • Consideration of any non‐detects within the dataset. • Consideration of potential outliers within the dataset. • Consideration of the statistical distribution of the data (i.e. normality/non normality).
6.5.4 Consideration of Normality of Dataset
CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance notes that the choice of statistical test to be applied to the dataset will depend on the assumptions about the distribution of the data being tested. The assumptions of the statistical test adopted therefore must be appropriate to the distribution assumptions of the data being considered.
The CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance details the following two key statistical tests.
• The one‐sample t test assumes the data being assessed is approximately normally distributed.
• The one‐sided Chebychev Theorem – assumes the data being assessed does not demonstrate normality (method makes no assumption about the shape of the distribution).
CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance, however notes ‘…with large datasets, minor deviations from normality may be flagged as statistically significant even though small deviations from a normal distribution will not affect the reliability of the one sample t‐test’. The guidance goes on to note ‘Conversely, datasets with a small sample size more easily pass normality tests. Failing, however to detect non‐normality in a small dataset is unlikely to compromise the validity of the one sample t‐test’ [Jackson Purdue Lever emphasis added].
CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance further notes ‘When considering which of the two tests to use, however, assessors should bear in mind that, in general, the one‐sample t‐test is more powerful that the method based on the Chebychev Theorem…Given that the one sample t‐test is also not sensitive to moderate departures from normality, it is recommended that assessors use the t‐test unless there is good evidence that the dataset departs significantly from normality’ [Jackson Purdue Lever emphasis added].
On the basis of the above, an assumption of data normality has been made and the one‐sample t‐test adopted accordingly.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
28
6.5.5 Consideration of Non‐Detects within the Dataset.
The dataset may reveal the presence of non‐detects for a number of the determinants tested. Where this occurs, we have adopted the LOD as the chemical concentration, which provides a suitably conservative approach.
However, please note that SACs have only been used for determinants where they are present at concentrations in excess of the LOD on at least one occasion.
6.5.6 Consideration of Outliers
The CL:AIRE/CIEH statistical guidance advises that ‘…if outliers are identified, assessors have to decide whether they represent genuine soil concentrations or are the result of an error’.
The guidance further notes that outliers should only be excluded from a dataset where they ‘…are obviously and demonstrably the result of an error that can be identified and explained’ or ‘clearly indicate that more than one soil population exists within the dataset and this can be justified by (or informs the further development of) the conceptual model‐ in which case the different population expressed by the outliers(s) should be explored in more detail’.
Taking account of the foregoing, we have adopted a policy of interrogating the relevant dataset to calculate the UCL and to ascertain the possible presence of statistical outliers (where relevant). At this point the possible relevance of statistical outliers to the interpretation of the data is considered, in accordance with the following matrix.
TABLE 5 – OUTLIER DECISION MATRIX
UCL < SAC UCL > SAC
Outlier Test reveals No Hotspot(s)
Determinant present at acceptable concentrations.
Pervasive contamination present in soil at unacceptable concentrations.
Outlier Test reveals Hotspot(s)
Determinant present at acceptable concentrations. Possible second population identified. Only of potential concern where outlier is at an individual concentration in excess of the Tier 1 SAC.
Pervasive contamination present in soil at unacceptable concentrations with possible hotspots of contamination identified.
It should be noted that where the UCL of a determinant, and all individual determinant
concentrations are below the SAC, the outlier test has not been interrogated/interpreted.
6.5.7 CLEA Averaging Area
The CLEA Model requires consideration of an averaging area, i.e. an area within which the UCL is calculated and compared to the Tier 1 SAC. Within our assessments the site has been adopted as the averaging area in the first instance.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
29
6.6 Sampling Strategy Our sampling strategy for the site is based on a review of the historical, geological and environmental information obtained as part of the Phase I Desk study together with the current setting of the site, access restrictions and the ground conditions encountered during our Phase II exploratory works. Visually representative soil samples were obtained during our Phase II works from across the site and subjected to chemical analysis for a suite of contaminants deemed appropriate based on our Land Use Assessment.
6.7 Contamination Soil Test Results
6.7.1 General Screening Suite – Made Ground (containing anthropogenic materials)
The contamination assessment for the Made Ground at the site is summarised in Table 6.
TABLE 6 ‐ SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SITE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (SAC) DATA ASSESSMENT ‐ MADE GROUND
Determinants No. of Samples Tested
Conc. Range (mg/kg)
Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)
Residential
Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)
Commercial
Site Average Area UCL
Tier 1 SAC Exceeded @ UCL (Yes/No)
Metals Arsenic 7 5‐48 32 CLEA SGV 640 CLEA SGV 36.7 Yes(Resi.) Cadmium 7 0.6‐4.1 10 CLEA SGV 230 CLEA SGV 3.2 NoChromium 7 11‐25 3000 GAC 30400 GAC 22.4 No
Lead 7 25‐240 450 CLEA SGV 750 CLEA SGV 96.9 NoNickel 7 9‐48 130 CLEA SGV 1800 CLEA SGV 39 No Mercury 7 <0.17‐1.1 170 CLEA SGV 3600 CLEA SGV 0.6 NoCopper 7 14‐219 2330 GAC 71700 GAC 135.2 No Selenium 7 1‐2 350 CLEA SGV 13000 CLEA SGV 1.8 No
Zinc 7 47‐131 3750 GAC 665000 GAC 121.1 NoPAHs
Acenapthene 7 0.1‐2.7 210 GAC 85000 GAC 1.4 NoFluorene 7 0.1‐1.5 160 GAC 64000 GAC 0.8 No
Phenanthrene 7 0.2‐17.8 92 GAC 22000 GAC 9.6 NoAnthracene 7 0.1‐2.8 2300 GAC 530000 GAC 1.5 No Fluoranthene 7 0.1‐42.6 260 GAC 23000 GAC 20.6 No
Pyrene 7 0.2‐38.7 560 GAC 54000 GAC 18.5 NoBenzo(a)anthracene 7 0.1‐23.7 3.1 GAC 90 GAC 11.3 Yes(Resi.)
Chrysene 7 0.1‐24.8 6.0 GAC 140 GAC 11.9 Yes(Resi.)Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene 7 0.2‐34.3 5.6 GAC 100 GAC 16.1 Yes(Resi.)
Benzo(a)pyrene 7 0.1‐22.5 0.83 GAC 14 GAC 10.51 Yes(Resi.)Indeno(123‐cd)pyrene 7 0.1‐12.2 3.2 GAC 60 GAC 5.7 Yes(Resi.) Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 7 0.1‐4.0 0.76 GAC 13 GAC 1.9 Yes(Resi.) Benzo(ghi)perylene 7 0.1‐17.3 44 GAC 650 GAC 8.1 NoAcenaphthylene 7 0.1‐0.9 170 GAC 84000 GAC 0.4 No Naphthalene 7 0.1‐3.0 1.5 GAC 200 GAC 1.5 Yes(Resi.)
Key * ‐ Geometric Mean (see SGV10 pg14). CLEA SGV ‐ CLEA Published Generic Soil Guideline Values. GAC ‐ CIEH/LQM Generic Assessment Criteria.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
30
The UCL concentration for the following determinands were in excess of their respective Tier 1 SAC for a residential end use: • Arsenic. • Benzo(a)anthracene. • Chrysene. • Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene • Benzo(a)pyrene. • Indeno(123‐cd)pyrene. • Dibenzo(ah)anthracene. • Naphthalene.
An outlier test was undertaken for the above determinands to assess for the presence of potential contaminant ‘hot‐spots’. The Outlier Tests indicate that, based on the decision matrix presented in Table 5 and the data set available for assessment, the highest concentration of Arsenic is not a statistical outlier (i.e. not a contamination hot‐spot). The Outlier Test indicates that, based on the decision matrix presented in Table 4 and the data set available for assessment, the highest concentration of all of the above PAHs were statistical outliers (i.e. is a contamination hot‐spots). However, further consideration of the test results indicates that for a majority of these determinants there is more than one test result above the respective SAC. Therefore, whilst the highest value is a statistical outlier, the presence of other exceedances in the data set suggests that the contamination is also pervasive across the site. The remaining foregoing determinands were found to be present at UCL mean concentrations below the appropriate Tier 1 SAC for a residential end use. No individual or UCL concentrations were recorded above their respective Tier 1 SAC for a Commercial end use.
6.7.2 General Screening Suite – Natural Strata (possible reworked / disturbed natural soils) The contamination assessment for the natural strata (possible reworked / disturbed) at the site is summarised in Table 7.
TABLE 7 ‐ SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SITE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (SAC) DATA ASSESSMENT – NATURAL STRATA (POSSIBLE REWORKED)
Determinants No. of Samples Tested
Conc. Range (mg/kg)
Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)
Residential
Tier 1 SAC (mg/kg)
Commercial
Site Average Area UCL
Tier 1 SAC Exceeded @ UCL (Yes/No)
Metals Arsenic 5 3‐7 32 CLEA SGV 640 CLEA SGV 6.2 No Cadmium 5 1.4‐2 10 CLEA SGV 230 CLEA SGV 1.9 NoChromium 5 25‐30 3000 GAC 30400 GAC 28.9 No
Lead 5 16‐33 450 CLEA SGV 750 CLEA SGV 20.1 NoNickel 5 18‐33 130 CLEA SGV 1800 CLEA SGV 31.3 No Mercury 5 0.17‐0.2 170 CLEA SGV 3600 CLEA SGV 0.2 No
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
31
TABLE 7 ‐ SUMMARY OF TIER 1 SITE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (SAC) DATA ASSESSMENT – NATURAL STRATA (POSSIBLE REWORKED)
Copper 5 15‐29 2330 GAC 71700 GAC 25.4 No Selenium 5 1‐2 350 CLEA SGV 13000 CLEA SGV 2.1 No
Zinc 5 61‐96 3750 GAC 665000 GAC 91.4 No PAHs
Acenapthene 5 0.1‐0.5 210 GAC 85000 GAC 0.4 No Fluorene 5 0.1‐0.4 160 GAC 64000 GAC 0.3 No
Phenanthrene 5 0.1‐2.5 92 GAC 22000 GAC 1.7 NoAnthracene 5 0.1‐0.6 2300 GAC 530000 GAC 0.4 No Fluoranthene 5 0.1‐1.4 260 GAC 23000 GAC 0.9 No
Pyrene 5 0.1‐1.4 560 GAC 54000 GAC 0.9 No Chrysene 5 0.1‐0.8 6.0 GAC 140 GAC 0.6 No
Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene 5 0.2‐0.7 5.6 GAC 100 GAC 0.5 No Benzo(a)pyrene 5 0.1‐0.5 0.83 GAC 14 GAC 0.35 No
Indeno(123‐cd)pyrene 5 0.1‐0.2 3.2 GAC 60 GAC 0.2 NoBenzo(ghi)perylene 5 0.1‐0.4 44 GAC 650 GAC 0.3 No
Naphthalene 5 0.1‐0.6 1.5 GAC 200 GAC 0.4 NoKey * ‐ Geometric Mean (see SGV10 pg14). CLEA SGV ‐ CLEA Published Generic Soil Guideline Values. GAC ‐ CIEH/LQM Generic Assessment Criteria.
The assessment of soil test results for the Natural Strata (reworked / disturbed) has not revealed the presence of any determinands at UCL concentrations elevated above their respective Tier 1 SAC assuming a residential end use.
6.7.3 TPH The results of the hydrocarbon testing indicate that the concentrations of hydrocarbons in nine of the twelve samples tested were below the laboratory level of detection. The concentrations of hydrocarbons in the remaining three samples were considered to be low (maximum 89.5mg/kg Total TPH). Furthermore, none of the fractions of TPH were in excess of their Tier 1 SAC for a residential end use.
6.7.4 Asbestos Six samples of the shallow Made Ground were screened for asbestos fibres. No free asbestos fibres were detected within the samples analysed.
6.8 Contamination Assessment Summary The results of the chemical testing undertaken at the site indicate that the individual and UCL concentrations of Arsenic and a number of PAHs in the shallow Made Ground are in excess of their respective Tier 1 SACs and may represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use. The concentrations detected in the Natural Strata (reworked / disturbed) are not considered likely to represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use The concentrations detected are considered unlikely to represent a significant risk to controlled waters due to their relative insolubility and limited mobility in the given environmental scenario.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
32
7.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL 7.1 General
The DEFRA publication ‘Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 2A Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance’ (dated April 2012) states the following with regards to the production of a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for a site: ‘The process of risk assessment involves understanding the risks presented by land, and the associated uncertainties. In practice, this understanding is usually developed and communicated in the form of a “conceptual model”. The development of a CSM is typically undertaken in an iterative process, reflecting the changes in understanding as more detailed site information becomes available. In developing a CSM, and specifically in the context of land contamination, consideration needs to be given to three essential elements; which form the basis of any risk present. The statutory guidance sections 3.8 and 3.9 (April 2012) states the following with respect to Part 2A. Under Part 2A, for a relevant risk to exist there needs to be one or more contaminant‐pathway‐receptor [CPR] linkages – “contaminant linkage” – by which a relevant receptor might be affected by the contaminants in question. In other words, for a risk to exist there must be contaminants present in, on or under the land in a form and quantity that poses a hazard, and one or more pathways by which they might significantly harm people, the environment, or property; or significantly pollute controlled waters. For the purposes of this guidance: (a) A “contaminant” is a substance which is in, on or under the land and which has the potential to
cause significant harm to a relevant receptor, or to cause significant pollution of controlled waters.
(b) A “receptor” is something that could be adversely affected by a contaminant, for example a person, an organism, and ecosystem, property, or controlled waters. The various types of receptors that are relevant under the Part 2A regime are explained in later sections.
(c) A “pathway” is a route by which a receptor is or might be affected by a contaminant.
‘The term “contaminant linkage” means the relationship between a contaminant, a pathway and a receptor. All three elements of a contaminant linkage must exist in relation to a particular land before the land can be considered potentially to be contaminated land under Part 2A, including evidence of the actual presence of contaminants. The term “significant contaminant linkage”, as used in this Guidance, means a contaminant linkage which gives rise to a level of risk sufficient to justify a piece of land being determined as contaminated land. The term “significant contaminant” means the contaminant which forms part of a significant contaminant linkage.’ With respect to the presence of background levels of contaminants, section 3.21 to 3.23 states ‘The Part 2A regime was introduced to help identify and deal with land which poses unacceptable levels of risk. It was not intended to apply to land with levels of contaminants in soil that are commonplace and widespread throughout England or parts of it, and for which in the very large majority of cases there is no reason to consider that there is an unacceptable risk.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
33
Normal levels of contaminants in soil should not be considered to cause land to qualify as contaminated land, unless there is a particular reason to consider otherwise. Therefore, if it is established that land is at or close to normal levels of particular contaminants, it should usually not be considered further in relation to the Part 2A regime... For the purpose of this Guidance, “normal” levels of contaminants in soil may result from: (a) The natural presence of contaminants (e.g. caused by soil formation processes and underlying
geology) at levels that might reasonably be considered typical in a given area and have not been shown to pose an unacceptable risk to health or the environment.
(b) The presence of contaminants caused by low level diffuse pollution, and common human activity other than specific industrial processes. For example, this would include diffuse pollution caused by historic use of leaded petrol and the presence of benzo(a)pyrene from vehicle exhausts, and the spreading of domestic ash in gardens at levels that might reasonably be considered typical.’
In selecting appropriate generic assessment criteria Section 3.27 of the Guidance states: ‘It is common practice in contaminated land risk assessment to use “generic assessment criteria” (GACs) as screening tools in generic quantitative human health risk assessment to help assessors decide when land can be excluded from the need for further inspection and assessment, or when further work would be warranted’. With respect to assessing contaminated land, section 4.17 of the Guidance states: ‘In deciding whether or not land is contaminated land on grounds of significant possibility of significant harm to human health, the local authority should use the categorisations described in paragraphs 4.19 – 4.30 below. Categories 1 and 2 would encompass land which is capable of being determined as contaminated land on the grounds of significant possibility of harm to human health. Categories 3 and 4 would encompass land which is not capable of being determined on such grounds.’ In relation to the use of GAC values in the assessment of contaminated land, section 3.29 of the Guidance states: ‘GACs relating to human health risk assessment represent cautious estimates of levels of contaminants in soil at which there is considered to be no risk to health or, at most, a minimal risk to health. With regards to such GACs: (a) They may be used to indicate when land is very unlikely to pose a significant possibility of
significant harm to human health. This is on the basis that they are designed to estimate levels of contamination at which risks are likely to be negligible or minimal and far from posing a significant possibility of significant harm to human health.
(b) They should not be used as direct indicators of whether a significant possibility of significant harm to human health may exist. Also, the local authority should not view the degree by which the GACs are exceeded (in itself) as being particularly relevant to this consideration, given that the degree of risk posed by land would normally depend on many factors other than simply the amount of contaminants in soil.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
34
(c) They should not be seen as screening levels which describe the boundary between Categories 3 and 4 in terms of Section 4 (i.e. the two Categories in which land would not be contaminated land on grounds of risk to human health). In the very large majority of cases, these SGVs/GACs describe levels of contamination from which risks should be considered to be comfortably within Category 4.
(d) They should not be viewed as indicators of levels of contamination above which detailed risk assessment would automatically be required under Part 2A.
(e) They should not be used as generic remediation targets under the Part 2A regime. Nor should they be used in this way under the planning system, for example in relation to ensuring that land affected by contaminated does not meet the Part 2A definition of contaminated land after it has been developed.’
In undertaking a risk assessment and deriving a CSM for the purposes of the redevelopment of a site (i.e. planning and development control) reference has been made to both the Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, as well as the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, dated March 2012). Reference has also been made to the Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance (referenced above), although this is primarily concerned with Local Government determinations of Statutory ‘Contaminated Land’, which is separate to planning framework requirements.
7.2 SPR Considerations
The following SPR assessment has been undertaken based on the assumption that the site is proposed to be redeveloped with residential housing (i.e. the most conservative end use within the proposed development). For the purpose of the following Conceptual Site Model we have considered the Made Ground to comprise the near surface soils containing significant amounts of anthropogenic materials. The underlying soils, which comprise entirely natural soils (although there is evidence to suggest that they may have been historically reworked / disturbed), are regarded as ‘natural soils’.
7.3 Consideration of Potential Sources of Contamination
The potential sources of contamination at the site are primarily:
• Metals and metalloids associated with any Made Ground. • Natural Metal Enrichment (NME) in Natural Strata. • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in any Made Ground. • Hydrocarbons associated with the historical use and storage of fuel/oil at the site. • Acid/Sulphate contaminated soils. • Asbestos.
7.4 Consideration of Potential Receptors
The potential receptors at the site are:
• The construction personnel (i.e. site workers) involved with the development of the site (typically short term (acute) exposure).
• The final end users i.e. occupants (typically long term (chronic) exposure). • Controlled waters.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
35
• Buildings, construction materials and buried services. • Flora.
7.5 Consideration of Potential Pathways
The potential pathways at the site are primarily: • Direct ingestion of soil. • Plant uptake. • Direct skin contact with the ground. • Inhalation of dust. • Direct contact with buildings. • Vertical and lateral migration of contamination.
7.6 Summary
The conceptual site model of possible SPR pollutant linkages, produced by Jackson Purdue Lever, is summarised in Table 7. It must be understood that the foregoing SPR assessment relates to the sites proposed residential end use (as a conservative assessment).
TABLE 8 – SUMMARY OF SPR ASSESSMENT
Source/ Substance
Receptor Pathway Comments
Plau
sible
Pollu
tant
Link
age
Possible Mitigation
Possible Statutory
‘Contaminated Land’ following
mitigation
Contaminated Soils
Site Workers
Direct Ingestion & Direct Contact
Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground.
X Site workers to wear appropriate PPE for usual health and safety reasons.
X
Contaminated Soils
Site Workers
Inhalation of Dust
Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground. X
Site workers to wear appropriate PPE for usual health and safety reasons.
X
Contaminated Soils
End Users – Site Residents
Direct Ingestion & Direct Contact
Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground in excess of residential Tier 1 SACs.
X
Made Ground capped with 0.6m of approved clean soil in private gardens / soft landscaped areas of residential development. Alternatively, remove Made Ground from gardens / soft landscaped areas.
X
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
36
TABLE 8 – SUMMARY OF SPR ASSESSMENT
Source/ Substance
Receptor Pathway Comments
Plau
sible
Pollu
tant
Link
age
Possible Mitigation
Possible Statutory
‘Contaminated Land’ following
mitigation
Contaminated Soils
End Users – Site Residents
Inhalation of Dust
Elevated Arsenic and PAHs encountered in the Made Ground in excess of residential Tier 1 SACs. Following site development, generation of significant levels of dust on a chronic basis unlikely.
X
Made Ground capped with 0.6m of approved clean soil in private gardens / soft landscaped areas of residential development. Alternatively, remove Made Ground from gardens / soft landscaped areas.
X
Contaminated Soils
Controlled Waters
Vertical and lateral migration
The concentrations of determinants detected are considered unlikely to represent a significant risk to controlled waters.
X
Specific remediation in relation to controlled waters considered unnecessary based on the chemical status of the soils analysed at the site.
X
Contaminated Soils
Building Materials
Direct contact
Design Class DS‐1/ACEC Class AC‐1 (BRE Spec. Digest 1).
X Adopt appropriate concrete mix to all buried concrete.
X
Contaminated Soils
Services Direct contact
Consult utility companies regarding appropriate utility materials (including water supply pipes).
?
Subject to comment by water supply provider.
X
Elevated Ground Gases
End Users & Building Envelope
Vertical and lateral migration
Site classified as NHBC Amber 1 / CIRIA CS2.
Install appropriate ground gas precautions.
X
Radon End Users & Building Envelope
Vertical and lateral migration
The site is located within an area which does not require radon protection measures in the construction of new dwellings and extensions
X
No radon precautions required in proposed dwellings.
X
KEY Where text is in Bold Italic item is potentially present. Where normal text is used item is not present/plausible. X ‐ Pollutant linkage not plausible. - Pollutant linkage plausible, mitigation required.
? ‐ Insufficient information, further work necessary.
In the foregoing SPR assessment, determinants identified by chemical analysis are only considered to be contaminated with respect to generic guidance where:
• The determinant is present at a UCL concentration above the appropriate Tier 1 SAC.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
37
8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Ground Conditions Summary
Made Ground was encountered across the site to depths ranging between 0.75m to in excess of 4.65m (TP8). The Made Ground included anthropogenic materials (such as brick, slag, ash etc.) presumably derived from historical uses of the site. Underlying the Made Ground, variable natural strata (possibly reworked / disturbed) ranging from a soft to stiff sandy gravelly clay to a very loose wet brown silty fine to medium grained sand, was encountered to a maximum proven depth of 7.00m begl.
Whilst these soils did not include anthropogenic materials, there was evidence to suggest that they may have been reworked and / or disturbed in the past. The composition and strength of the soils was highly variable between test hole locations, with very soft peaty soils locally present, relatively high groundwater and collapsing excavations. Historically, the site appears to have been located at the edge of a flood plain (1848), with ground levels rising significantly in the southern part of the site. The site appears to have been subsequently regraded to accommodate Padiham Railway Station and associated sidings (circa late 19th century) and it is anticipated that this is when significant raising of ground levels occurred locally, presumably using natural soils excavated from elsewhere within the site. Therefore, the reworked materials have been in place over 100 years and in that time period have been locally surcharged by activities on site. The visual appearance of these reworked soils is therefore similar to natural Glacial Till deposits, although their significant variability in composition and strength appear to indicate reworking / disturbance of the soils.
8.2 Foundation Design Significant thickness of Made Ground (locally in excess of 4.65m) were encountered across the site, particularly in the west. Due to the high likelihood of extensive cut and fill works it is possible that reworked natural strata is present across much of the site. Given the absence of anthropogenic inclusions in the reworked natural strata the boundary between this material and the underlying natural strata is ambiguous. However, the material currently logged as ‘Possible Reworked Natural Strata’ is typically variable and locally poor in strength and is generally considered to be unsuitable for traditional spread foundations. Therefore, foundation solutions, such as piles or ground improvement (e.g. vibro stone columns or dynamic compaction techniques) are likely to be required for the proposed low rise residential and commercial developments. The advice of suitably competent piling and ground improvement contractors should be sought to determine the feasibility of this option. Further deep boreholes are recommended to prove the depth of competent bedrock and assist with foundation design.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
38
8.3 Floor Slabs Commercial Buildings
Ground bearing floor slabs will be appropriate for lightly loaded floor slabs where a limited depth of geotechnically competent ground is present. This would be subject to Structural Engineer design taking account of loading characteristics and tolerable settlement. Improvement of the ground by proof rolling of the formation and the inclusion of geotextile reinforcement in capping materials is recommended if ground bearing floor slabs are to be considered. Alternatively, ground floors may be designed as suspended. Residential Dwellings Made Ground has been encountered in excess of 0.60m across the site and therefore a suspended floor slab should be adopted. Suspended floors may be either reinforced concrete cast in‐situ or a pre‐cast concrete suspended floor with a clear ventilated void (i.e. beam and block), although if gas precautions in accordance with NHBC ‘Amber 1’ classification are proposed a beam and block floor will be required. Beam and block floors with a clear void and heave precautions will be required if deepening due to trees in excess of 1.50m depth.
8.4 Radon
The Landmark report for the site identifies that the site is not located within a radon affected area, and no radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensions.
8.5 Gas Precautions
The following two classifications are provided for residential and commercial properties respectively: Residential Priorities with a Suspended Ground Floor (NHBC Classification) In accordance with Table 14.1 of NHBC Guidance the site may be classified as ‘Amber 1’ where the following gas precautions are required assuming that residential properties will have a suspended floor slab (e.g. beam and block): • Provision of a minimum 2000g DPM membrane with all joints and penetrations sealed. • Ventilated sub‐floor void (minimum one complete volume change per 24 hours). • Gas protection measures should be installed as prescribed in BRE Report 414. Consideration may be given to the design of gas precautions in accordance with CIRIA C665 and BS8485: 2007 should alternative foundation / floor slab proposals be considered in residential properties. Commercial Properties (CIRIA C665)
In accordance with CIRIA C665, the site may be may be classified as ‘CS2’ for commercial properties as follows:
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
39
• Reinforced concrete cast in situ floor slab (suspended, non suspended or raft) with at least 1200g DPM.
• Or alternately, beam and block or pre cast concrete slab and minimum 2000g DPM/reinforced gas membrane.
The recommendations also include possible underfloor venting but it is considered unnecessary in this instance due to the absence of measurable gas flow, the absence of methane and the relatively low concentrations of Carbon Dioxide recorded.
All joints and penetrations should be sealed.
8.6 Building Near Trees
Foundations designs will require adjusting when building near existing, recently removed or proposed trees due to the presence of shallow cohesive soils beneath the site. Laboratory testing has generally revealed soils with a medium volume change potential and we would recommend that this classification is adopted for design purposes. The results indicate that the wet silty clayey fine to medium sand collected from TP12 is non plastic.
8.7 Coal Mining The coal mining report obtained for the site does not indicate the presence of any mining related issues which may adversely impact the redevelopment of the site. Therefore, no coal mining related investigations or precautions are considered necessary at the site.
8.8 Water Water was encountered during the advancement of nine of the twenty two exploratory holes as a slight to rapid seepage at depths ranging between 0.60 and 3.30m begl. The depth of the groundwater, as indicated during the four groundwater monitoring visits, varied between 0.51m and 2.34m begl. It is considered that excavations may locally require dewatering due to the presence of perched groundwater.
8.9 Excavations
The sides of eight of the twenty two exploratory holes were observed to collapse during the short period of time they were open. Several of the trial pits collapsed from the surface to the base of the hole. Consequently, excavations may require trench support. The requirement for trench support should be assessed by the groundworks contractor prior to commencing site works.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
40
8.10 Slope Stability / Retaining Walls Upon completion of the final development proposals (including proposed ground levels), an assessment of the impact of embankments / retaining walls (situated at the sites periphery) in relation to the proposed development layout should be commissioned to identify any specific requirements / constraints. Foundations and roads etc should be designed such that lateral loads are not imposed on the slopes and retaining walls. In conjunction with the above, an engineer assessment of the structural integrity of the retaining walls should be undertaken.
8.11 Sulphate Classification
Based on the laboratory soil test results, and in accordance with the Building Research Establishment publication Special Digest 1 ‘Concrete in Aggressive Ground’ (2005), the site falls into Design Sulfate Class DS‐1 and an Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC) classification of AC‐1.
Therefore an appropriate concrete mix should be adopted in accordance with BRE Special Digest 1 for all buried concrete in contact with the ground.
8.12 CBRs and Pavements
Typical CBR values of less than 2% could be initially anticipated at the site, subject to confirmation by in‐situ testing. However, a higher CBR value may be achieved locally during testing and following proof rolling of the formation layer. We would recommend that Topsoil (where present) is removed from beneath roads and hardstanding areas to avoid the potential for differential settlement.
8.13 Soakaways The use of soakaway drainage is unlikely to be feasible due to the depth of the Made Ground, the low permeability clayey soils which underlie the site at shallow depth and the presence of localised very shallow groundwater.
8.14 Contamination Assessment
The results of the chemical testing undertaken at the site indicate that the individual and UCL concentrations of Arsenic and a number of PAHs in the shallow Made Ground are in excess of their respective Tier 1 SACs and may represent a potential risk to human health for a residential end use. The concentrations detected are not considered likely to represent a significant risk to areas of commercial development at the site. The concentrations of TPH revealed during the current phase of exploratory works at the site were below detection or recorded in low concentrations (less than the Tier 1 SACs for human health for a residential end use). However, during a previous phase of works undertaken by others (2006), elevated concentrations of TPH were encountered at three locations across the site. These concentrations of TPH were not carbon banded and thus cannot be compared to Tier 1 SACs.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
41
The elevated concentrations of TPH were associated with Made Ground which included a constituent of ash or tarmacadam. When extracted with a solvent and analysed these materials can contain TPH in the mineral / diesel range. Visual and olfactory evidence of contamination was generally absent (excluding TP2 and WS2 where no elevated concentrations of TPH were detected) from the current and previous exploratory holes advanced at the site. Consequently, in light of the above, it is considered likely that the previous elevated concentrations of TPH detected were associated with the ash or tarmacadam constituents of the Made Ground and not leakages or spillages of hydrocarbons during historical site activities. The concentrations detected are considered unlikely to represent a significant risk to controlled waters due to their relative insolubility and limited mobility in the given environmental scenario.
8.15 Remediation Proposals Due to the potential risk to human health represented by the elevated concentrations of Arsenic and PAHs in the Made Ground remediation measures are required where residential development (private dwellings and the sheltered accommodation) is proposed at the site as follows: • A capping layer may be imported to site and placed in private gardens (0.60m thickness) and
soft landscaped areas (0.30m thickness) allowing the Made Ground to remain in‐situ where development levels permit.
• Alternatively, the Made Ground may be excavated from gardens and soft landscaped areas
and either removed off site to a licensed waste management facility or reused beneath areas of proposed hard standing.
The above recommendations are subject to Local Authority approval. Due to the historical use and storage of hydrocarbons over a pronged period at the site, the presence of undetected concentrations of hydrocarbons locally across the site which may require remedial action cannot be discounted (see Section 8.18), particularly as the location of above ground and underground fuel storage tanks has not been located and chemically validated. Further works should be undertaken to establish if the former underground fuel tanks in the west of the site are still present. Validation works should be undertaken in the soils underlying the tanks to confirm if hydrocarbon impaction is present. If hydrocarbon impaction is present remedial works may be required. A Remediation Method Statement and Remediation Validation Report are likely to be required by the Local Authority.
8.16 Topsoil
Topsoil was observed to be generally absent from the site. It will therefore be necessary to import additional topsoil for placement in proposed gardens and soft landscaped areas. Any imported soils should be tested at source to ensure they are suitably clean (prior to importation) in accordance with CLEA/generic guidance. Any imported topsoil should confirm to BS3882: 2007 ‘Specification for topsoil and requirements for use’, with respect to the presence of foreign objects, and ideally nutrient levels etc.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
42
8.17 Off‐site Disposal
If off‐site disposal is required the chemical testing regime can be different to the chemical testing required to assess the suitability of the soils for retention on site and the risks to human health and controlled waters. Therefore, effectively a new contamination assessment may be required to classify the soils for off‐site disposal with testing criteria to assess whether the soil is hazardous, non‐hazardous or inert waste. We would be pleased to undertake Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) testing of any soils proposed for disposal to landfill if requested. In the first instance, the test results from this investigation should be supplied to landfill operators to determine likely disposal costs before WAC testing is carried out.
8.18 Unforeseen Circumstances
Should any areas of potentially contaminated soil be encountered during site construction works, we would recommend consultation with Jackson Purdue Lever to ensure that our recommendations continue to apply. Due to the historical legacy of the site there is the potential for localised areas of contaminated soils to be present that have not been identified during the site investigation works (e.g. in areas where fuel tanks were present). However, based on our works to date, these should be localised to the source rather than the widespread across the site.
Any potentially contaminated soils should be left in‐situ and subjected to further assessment, to potentially include further chemical testing and risk assessment.
The following procedure should be adhered to if any areas of previously unidentified suspected contamination are encountered during the development of the site: i. Suspected contaminated material will remain in‐situ. ii. Jackson Purdue Lever to be notified, and will inform the Local Authority Environmental
Health Department and NHBC (if appropriate). iii. Jackson Purdue Lever will undertake a visual assessment of the possible contamination,
followed by appropriate sampling/testing (as necessary). iv. If necessary, an appropriate strategy to remove/remediate the contamination will be
submitted to the Local Authority and NHBC. 8.19 Construction Workers
It is recommended that construction personnel involved with direct contact with the soils at the site use appropriate PPE equipment together with welfare facilities in accordance with general health and safety guidelines.
8.20 Utilities
We would recommend that this report is supplied to utility companies (including water supply), and that their recommendations relating to appropriate supply pipes are adhered to.
REL00396/V1.0 Phase I & II Report
43
8.21 Licenses, Permits, Registrations and Approvals
The Contractor/Developer is responsible for, and must ensure that, all necessary licenses, permits, plans, registrations and approvals are in place prior to commencing with the works at the site. These will include any Site Waste Management Plans/Materials Management Plans, Mobile Treatment Licenses (MTLs) and/or Waste Management Licenses/Exemptions as necessary to enable the completion of the proposed works.
8.22 Statutory Consultation
In accordance with normal planning requirements, we would recommend that a copy of our report is issued by the Client to the Local Authority (and NHBC, if necessary) for review/comment and approval prior to commencing with the redevelopment of the site.
8.23 Further Works
• Further deep shell & auger boreholes to assist in foundation design. • Establish whether underground fuel tanks are still present in the west of the site.
Subsequently, remove tanks (where present), validate underlying soils and remediate as necessary.
• Engineer assessment of retaining walls.
APPENDIX I
Site Location Plan
REL00396
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS
Client Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd Checked Project Station Road Approved
Padiham Scale NTSDate Drawn 06/12/2012
Title Site Location PlanRev.
REPRODUCED FROM THE ORDNANCE SURVEY MAP WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. LICENCE NO. AL 100050180
Figure No. REL00396/01
SITE LOCATION
APPENDIX II
Annotated Site Plan
Project No. Drawn GJS
Client Checked Project Date Drawn Approved
ScaleRevision
NTSFigure No. REL00396/02
REPRODUCED FROM LDA Design Red Line Plan dated Dec. 2010 (ref. 3067_100)
REL00396 Title Annotated Site PlanRenaissanace Land Regeneration LtdStation Road, Padiham 06/12/2012
Pathways
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY Estimated 5‐6m
bank
Former railway embankment sloping downwards to the
north
School
Approx. 4m retaining wall
RailwayBridge
Approx. 1m retaining wall
Approx. 2m retaining wallretaining site
levels
Commercial Premises
Yard
Residential Housing
Leisure Centre
Residential Housing
Estimated 5‐6m bank
Stockpile of brick & concrete
Estimated 5m retaining wall
Predominantly gravel surfaced site with sporadic grasses, shrubs and trees
Former railway embankment sloping downwards to the
north
RailwayBridge
APPENDIX III
Site Plan Showing General Site Views
Project No. Drawn GJS
Client Checked Project Date Drawn Approved
ScaleRevision
Figure No. REL00396/03
REPRODUCED FROM LDA Design Red Line Plan dated Dec. 2010 (ref. 3067_100)
REL00396 Title Plan Showing General Site ViewsRenaissanace Land Regeneration LtdStation Road, Padiham 06/12/2012
NTS
APPENDIX IV
Exploratory Hole Location Plan & Depth of Made Ground
Project No. Drawn GJS
Client Checked Project Date Drawn Approved
ScaleRevision
REPRODUCED FROM LDA Design Red Line Plan dated Dec. 2010 (ref. 3067_100)
REL00396 Title Trial Pit and Window Sample Borehole Location PlanRenaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham 06/12/2012
Figure No. REL00396/04
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY
NB: All locations shown are approximate
Trial Pit
KEYWindow Sample Borehole
(G) Ground Gas Monitoring Well
WS1
WS2 (G)
WS3
WS4 (G)
WS5 (G)
WS6
WS7 (G)
WS8 (G)
TP1
TP2
TP3
TP4TP5
TP6
TP7
TP8
TP9
TP10
TP11
TP12
TP13
TP14
Project No. Drawn GJS
Client Checked Project Date Drawn Approved
ScaleRevision
REPRODUCED FROM LDA Design Red Line Plan dated Dec. 2010 (ref. 3067_100)
REL00396 Title Plan Indicating Depth of Made Ground (anthropogenic inclusions)Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham 06/12/2012
Figure No. REL00396/05
APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY
NB: All locations shown are approximate
Trial Pit
KEYWindow Sample Borehole
(G) Ground Gas Monitoring Well
[1.00] Depth of Made Ground
[1.00+] Depth of Made Ground (m) Unproven
WS1
WS2 (G)
WS3
WS4 (G)
WS5 (G)
WS6
WS7 (G)
WS8 (G)
TP1
TP2
TP3
TP4TP5
TP6
TP7
TP8
TP9
TP10
TP11
TP12
TP13
TP14
[2.00]
[2.00]
[0.95]
[1.00]
[1.70]
[0.50+]
[1.00]
[1.00]
[0.75]
[1.00+]
[1.10]
[1.50][0.85]
[0.30]
[2.20]
[4.65+]
[0.60]
[1.80]
[2.50]
[1.10]
[1.00]
[1.50]
APPENDIX V
Exploratory Hole Logs
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3.Borehole terminated at 3.00m due to SPT refusal.
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS1
WS1
0.30
0.80
1.00-1.45
2.00-2.452.10
2.30-2.80
3.00-3.45
D
D
C
CD
B
C
D1
D2
D3
B1
4
4
50/140mm
(0.70)
0.70
(1.00)
1.70(0.30)2.00
(0.95)
2.953.00
Loose grey-brown sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly subangular brick and concrete(MADE GROUND)
Soft to firm grey-brown slightly gravellysandy clay. Gravel is predominantly fine tomedium subangular brick and coal with frequentcarbonaceous inclusions(MADE GROUND)
Soft to firm grey-brown silty sandy gravellyclay. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Very loose brown very silty SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Hard red-brown to yellow very gravelly CLAY.Gravel is predominantly fine to mediumsubrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Borehole at 3.00 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.Water encountered at 1.00m.3. Plain pipe with bentonite seal installed from ground level to 1.00m, slotted pipe with gravel surround installed from
1.00m to 3.70m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.5.Borehole terminated at 4.00m due to SPT refusal on hard strata.
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS2
WS2
0.40
1.00-1.45
2.00-2.452.10
2.70
3.00-3.45
3.80
4.00-4.45
D/J/V
C
CD/J/V
D/J/V
C
J/V
C
D1/J1/V1
D2/J2/V2
D3/J3/V3
J4/V4
10
50/290mm
11
50/265mm
(1.00)
1.00
(1.00)
2.00
(0.50)
2.50
(1.45)
3.954.00
Medium dense black-brown gravel to cobblegrade brick, concrete and sandstone in an ashyclay matrix(MADE GROUND)
No recovery(NO RECOVERY)
Soft brown locally black stained wet sandySILT with a slight to moderate hydrocarbonodour(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Medium dense brown wet SAND and GRAVEL with amoderate hydrocarbon odour. Gravel ispredominanty fine to medium subroundedquartzite and flint(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Medium dense grey-brown silty clayey GRAVEL.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Borehole at 4.00 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3.Borehole terminated at 1.00m due to SPT refusal on hard strata.
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS3
WS3
0.50
1.00-1.45
D/J/V
C
D1/J1/V1
50/60mm
(0.80)
0.800.951.00
Loose to medium dense black-brown sandygravel. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subangular ash, brick, limestone, coal,clinker, concrete and sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Sandstone cobble(MADE GROUND)
Very stiff to stiff brown gravelly very siltyvery sandy CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subangular to subrounded sandstoneand quartzite(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Borehole at 1.00 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3. Plain pipe with bentonite seal installed from ground level to 1.00m, slotted pipe with gravel surround installed from
1.00m to 2.00m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.5.Borehole terminated at 2.00m due to refusal on hard strata (possible sandstone cobble).
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS4
WS4
0.20
0.70
1.00-1.451.10
2.00-2.45
2.30-2.80
D
D/J/V
CD/J/V
C
B
D1
D2/J1/V1
D3/J2/V2
B1
4
50/235mm
(0.40)
0.40
0.60
(0.40)
1.00
(1.00)
2.00
Dark brown sandy clayey topsoil(MADE GROUND)
Gravel to cobble grade sandstone in a gravellyclay matrix(MADE GROUND)
Loose black ashy sand(MADE GROUND)
Soft to firm becoming hard brown gravellysandy CLAY. Gravel is predominanty fine tomedium subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Borehole at 2.00 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3. Plain pipe with bentonite seal installed from ground level to 1.00m, slotted pipe with gravel surround installed from
1.00m to 4.00m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS5
WS5
0.50
0.80
1.00-1.45
2.00-2.45
2.50
2.80-3.20
3.00-3.453.00
4.00-4.45
5.00-5.45
6.00-6.45
6.50
7.00-7.45
D
D
C
C
D
B
CD
C
C
C
D
C
D1
D2
D3
B1
D4
D5
8
32
8
10
16
16
40
(0.30)0.30
(0.40)
0.70
(1.00)
1.70
(1.10)
2.80
(4.10)
6.907.00
Loose light brown sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly fine to medium subangularlimestone(MADE GROUND)
Loose to medium dense brown gravel to cobblegrade sandstone and mudstone(MADE GROUND)
Firm ashy gravelly sandy clay. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangularsandstone(MADE GROUND)
Hard becoming firm grey-brown sandy gravellyclayey SILT. Gravel is predominanty fine tomedium subangular to subrounded sandstone andquartzite(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Firm to stiff grey-brown gravelly very sandysilty CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subangular sandstone and quartzite(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Slightly clayey silty sandy PEAT(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Borehole at 7.00 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3.Borehole terminated at 0.50m due to hard strata.
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS6
WS6
(0.50)
0.50
Loose grey-brown gravelly sand. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangularconcrete(MADE GROUND)
End of Borehole at 0.50 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3. Plain pipe with bentonite seal installed from ground level to 1.00m, slotted pipe with gravel surround installed from
1.00m to 4.00m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS7
WS7
0.30
0.70
1.00-1.451.10
1.50-2.00
2.00-2.45
2.50
3.00-3.45
4.00-4.45
5.00-5.45
6.00-6.45
D
D/J/V
CD
B
C
D
C
C
C
C
D1
D2/J1/V1
D3
B1
D4
11
9
5
7
7
14
(0.60)
0.60
(0.40)
1.00
(5.00)
6.00
Loose grey sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangularlimestone and macadam(MADE GROUND)
Firm brown sandy gravelly clay. Gravel ispredominantly fine to medium subangular brick,coal, ash and concrete(MADE GROUND)
Firm grey-brown gravelly sandy very siltyCLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular to subrounded quartzite andsandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...becoming silty below 2.00m
End of Borehole at 6.00 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
Depth &LegendDepth (Thickness)
Project No.
Type Sample SPT
(m) Ref"N"
Value
Samples and Tests
Description of Strata
(m)
Casing
(m)
Ground-water
Installation
Remarks:
Project:
Logged:
Date:
Client:
Checked:
Approved:
Field Book Ref:Plant:
Scale:
Drawing Ref:
Key: D
U
B
J
W
=
=
=
=
=
Disturbed Sample
Undisturbed Sample
Bulk Sample
Jar Sample
Water Sample
S
C
=
=
Standard Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Test
=
=Water Strike (m)Steady Water Level (m)
(Split Spoon)
(Cone)
1.Borehole sides stable.2.No water encountered.3. Plain pipe with bentonite seal installed from ground level to 1.00m, slotted pipe with gravel surround installed from
1.00m to 4.00m.4.Bung, valve and protective cover installed.
GS
25/10/2012
Station Road, Padiham
GS1201
Renaissance Land Regeneration Ltd
Competitor Rig
REL00396
WS8
WS8
0.20
0.901.00-1.45
1.10
2.00-2.45
3.00-3.45
4.00-4.45
5.00-5.45
D
J/VCD
C
C
C
C
D1
J2/V2
D29
4
6
9
19
(0.30)0.30
(0.50)
0.80
1.00
(4.00)
5.00
Loose black sandy gravel. Gravel ispredominantly fine to medium subangularmudstone and clinker(MADE GROUND)
Loose to medium dense yellow to brown gravelto cobble grade sandstone in a clayey matrix(MADE GROUND)
Firm grey-brown silty sandy gravelly clay.Gravel is predominantly fine to mediumsubangular sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Soft to stiff grey-brown gravelly sandy siltyCLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular to subrounded quartzite andsandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...30% recovery between 1.00m to 2.00m
End of Borehole at 5.00 m
1:50
Sheet 1 of 1
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable from 1.65m.2.Water encountered at 1.65m.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP1
TP1REL00396
0.100.15
0.30
0.450.50
0.750.750.75
1.001.001.101.101.10
1.65
1.75
2.10
2.60
2.70
T1
T2
T3
T4/B1
T5
J1
D
D
D
D/B
D
J
SV
SV
686462
908088
Loose brownish grey sandy slightly cobbly gravel ofsandstone with inclusions of brick and black shale(MADE GROUND)
Loose black silty gravel with occasional glasspieces and slag. Gravel is predominantly fine tomedium angular ash(MADE GROUND)
Firm greenish brown becoming orange-brown and lightbrown silty very sandy clay(MADE GROUND)
...with timbers in southern side of pit and aslight organic odour to 0.80m
Stiff fissured light brown and light grey siltygravelly CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subrounded to subangular mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
...with pockets of sand and fragments oforange-brown sandstone below 1.45m
Very loose light grey fine to coarse grainedgravelly SAND. Gravel is predominantly medium tocoarse subrounded sandstone and mudstone withoccasional mudstone and sandstone cobbles(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Medium dense brown very sandy fine to coursesubrounded to subangular GRAVEL and COBBLE of flintand sandstone with moderate hydrocarbon/tar odourand metallic sheen(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Firm brown and grey sandy gravelly CLAY(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable from 1.65m.2.Water encountered at 1.65m.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP1
TP1REL00396
3.00
3.20
J2 JFirm brown and grey sandy gravelly CLAY(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 3.20 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Water encountered at 0.65m.3.Trial pit terminated at 1.00m due to rapid water ingress.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP2
TP2REL00396
1.00
Brown sandy gravel and cobble of concrete and rarebrick with rare polythene(MADE GROUND)
...with a layer of concrete cobble at 0.80m
End of Trial Pit at 1.00 m
1:20
Sheet 1 of 1
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable within Made Ground.2.Water encountered at 1.10m.3.Trial pit terminated at 2.75m due to hard strata.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP3
TP3REL00396
0.50
1.10
1.201.20
2.50
2.75
T1/J1
B1T2/J2
T3
D/J
BD/J
D
Loose light grey and black silty sandy gravel andcobble of limestone, slag, ash, bitumen and flintwith large boulders of sandstone(MADE GROUND)
...with a layer of large sandstone boulders at0.80m
Very stiff greyish brown fissured very sandygravelly SILT/CLAY. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subangular black mudstone and shale withcobbles and rare boulders of mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 2.75 m
1:20
Sheet 1 of 1
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing from 0.80m.2.Water encountered at 3.30m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.65m due to sidewalls collapsing.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP4
TP4REL00396
0.40
0.50
0.80
1.00
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.202.202.20
2.50
T1/J1
T2
T3/J2
B1
T4
D/J
D
D/J
B
D
SV 252822
Light brown sandy gravel of limestone(MADE GROUND)
...with fragments of macadam surfacing at southernend of pit
Stiff grey gravelly cobbly clayey sandy silt.Gravel and cobble is predominantly medium to coarseflint and mudstone(MADE GROUND)
Medium dense rusty brown sandy gravel and cobble offlint, sandstone, whole brick, rusty slag andpockets of black sandy ash(MADE GROUND)
Firm brown very sandy very gravelly CLAY withcobble of mudstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subrounded mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
..becoming soft and damp below 2.20m
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing from 0.80m.2.Water encountered at 3.30m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.65m due to sidewalls collapsing.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP4
TP4REL00396
3.10
3.65
SV 15Firm brown very sandy very gravelly CLAY withcobble of mudstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subrounded mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...becoming grey and very soft below 3.10m
End of Trial Pit at 3.65 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Slight water seepage at 1.10m.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP5
TP5REL00396
0.20
0.30
0.85
1.001.00
2.002.00
T1/J1
B1T2/J2
T3
D/J
BD/J
DSV 35
Light grey sandy fine to coarse gravel and cobbleof concrete(MADE GROUND)
Stiff brown and light brown silty gravelly claymixed with black fine to coarse sandy ash with rareslag(MADE GROUND)
...with a concrete slab with sub-base between 0.80mto 1.10m in northern end of pit
Very stiff fissured brownish grey clayey very sandygravelly cobbly SILT. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subrounded to angular black mudstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
...becoming soft and with occasional large bouldersof mudstone below 2.00m
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Slight water seepage at 1.10m.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP5
TP5REL00396
3.00
3.50
4.00
T4 D
SV 18Very soft grey gravelly cobbly SILT with boulders(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 4.00 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable from surface to base of pit.2.Water seepage encountered at 2.20m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.40m due to sidewalls collapsing.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP6
TP6REL00396
0.100.15
0.30
0.450.50
1.50
2.50
T1
T2/J1
T3/J2
B1
T4
D
D/J
D/J
B
D
Black sandy gravel of limestone, shale andsandstone(MADE GROUND)
Loose grey sandy gravel of limestone(MADE GROUND)...with 120mm diameter steel pipe filled withconcrete encountered at 0.30m
Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND withlenses of soft very sandy clay(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
...becoming damp and medium dense below 1.30m
...with running sand at 2.20m
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable from surface to base of pit.2.Water seepage encountered at 2.20m.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.40m due to sidewalls collapsing.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP6
TP6REL00396
3.40
Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND withlenses of soft very sandy clay(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 3.40 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable below 2.40m.2.Water encountered at 2.60m with running sand.3.Trial pit terminated due to running sand conditions.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP7
TP7REL00396
0.35
0.50
0.75
1.001.00
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.40
2.50
T1/J1
B1T2/J2
T3
T4
D/J
BD/J
D
D
SV 40
Light brown fine to medium subangular gravel oflimestone(MADE GROUND)
Medium dense brown sandy gravel and cobbles offlint, sandstone, mudstone with large boulders andfragments of sandstone and occasional timberfragments(MADE GROUND)
Very stiff fissured greenish brown slightly clayeyvery sandy gravelly cobbly silt with occasionalboulders(MADE GROUND)
...with local pockets of black silt, rare ceramic,wood fragments and coal
Firm fissured greenish brown slightly clayey verysandy gravelly cobbly silt with occasional bouldersand fragments of partially burnt shale(MADE GROUND)
Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable below 2.40m.2.Water encountered at 2.60m with running sand.3.Trial pit terminated due to running sand conditions.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP7
TP7REL00396
3.40
Loose light brown very silty fine grained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 3.40 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides generally stable.2.Water encountered at 0.95m from base of granular Made Ground.3.Trial pit terminated at 4.65m as full extent of JCB reached.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP8
TP8REL00396
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.40
1.50
2.50
T1/J1
B1
T2/J2
D/J
B
D/J
SV
SV
40
45
Medium dense brownish grey becoming grey cobble andgravel of sandstone, mudstone, bricks and concrete(MADE GROUND)
...with abundant boulders of sandstone and mudstoneand some timber below 1.00m
Firm brown slightly silty slightly sandy gravellyclay with local inclusions and pockets of blacksandy silt, red shale and yellow sandstone(MADE GROUND)
...with rare gravel of concrete, slag and ashbetween 2.50m to 3.00m
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides generally stable.2.Water encountered at 0.95m from base of granular Made Ground.3.Trial pit terminated at 4.65m as full extent of JCB reached.
25/10/2012
CJPGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP8
TP8REL00396
3.00
4.65
T3/J3 D/JFirm brown slightly silty slightly sandy gravellyclay with local inclusions and pockets of blacksandy silt, red shale and yellow sandstone(MADE GROUND)
...with a large sandstone boulder at 4.00m
End of Trial Pit at 4.65 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Water encountered at 0.60m as slight seepage.3.Shear vane readings taken at 2.00m are ex-situ.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP9
TP9REL00396
0.30
0.60
0.70
0.800.800.80
1.70
2.002.002.00
D1
D2
D3
D/J/V
D
D
SV
SV
509555
202025
Loose black sand and gravel with frequentsubrounded to subangular cobbles. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular ash,clinker, brick, ceramic and sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Firm becoming soft grey-brown silty sandy gravellyCLAY with occasional sandstone cobbles. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.Water encountered at 0.60m as slight seepage.3.Shear vane readings taken at 2.00m are ex-situ.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP9
TP9REL00396
4.40
Firm becoming soft grey-brown silty sandy gravellyCLAY with occasional sandstone cobbles. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 4.40 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing.2.Water encountered at 1.80m as moderate seepage.3.Trial pit terminated at 2.50m due to total collapse of sides.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP10
TP10REL00396
0.10
0.60
0.90
1.80
2.00
2.50
D1/J1
D2
D3
D/J
D
D
Loose black sand and gravel with occasionalsubrounded to subangular cobbles of sandstone.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subangularto subrounded ash, clinker, brick, quartzite andsandstone(MADE GROUND)
Loose damp brown silty clayey gravelly sand withoccasional cobbles of sandstone and rare pockets ofash and clinker. Gravel is predominantly fine tocoarse subangular to subrounded sandstone andquartzite(MADE GROUND)
Very loose very wet brown gravelly silty SAND.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subroundedsandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)...with running sand present locally between 1.80mto 2.50m
End of Trial Pit at 2.50 m
1:20
Sheet 1 of 1
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing below 2.50m.2.Water encountered at 2.50m as slight seepage.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.50m due to collapsing of sidewalls.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP11
TP11REL00396
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.70
0.800.800.800.901.00
1.90
2.502.50-3.00
2.60
D1
D2
D3
B1D4
D
D
D
BD
SV 404050
Loose grey sandy gravel to cobble grade limestone,quartzite and concrete(MADE GROUND)
Stiff grey-brown sandy gravelly clay with cobblesof sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Loose brown clayey sandy gravel with occasionalcobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto coarse subangular to subrounded brick, ash,clinker and quartzite(MADE GROUND)
Firm grey-brown gravelly silty sandy clay. Gravelis predominantly fine to coarse subangular tosubrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Firm to stiff grey-brown slightly gravelly claywith rare plastic and metal. Gravel is fine tocoarse subangular sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Very loose wet brown very silty fine to mediumgrained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing below 2.50m.2.Water encountered at 2.50m as slight seepage.3.Trial pit terminated at 3.50m due to collapsing of sidewalls.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP11
TP11REL00396
3.50
Very loose wet brown very silty fine to mediumgrained SAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 3.50 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing below 3.20m.2.Water encountered at 3.20m as slight seepage.3.Trial pit terminated at 4.30m due to collapsing of sidewalls.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP12
TP12REL00396
0.40
0.50
0.80
1.10
1.201.201.201.201.20
D1/J1
D2
D/J
DSV 20
252840
Loose black sandy gravel with cobble of brick andsandstone. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular ash, brick, clinker quartzite andsandstone(MADE GROUND)
Firm grey-brown sandy silty gravelly clay. Gravelis predominantly fine to coarse subangular tosubrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Loose black sandy gravel with cobbles of brick andsandstone. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular ash, brick, clinker quartzite andsandstone(MADE GROUND)
Soft grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY with somecobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides unstable and collapsing below 3.20m.2.Water encountered at 3.20m as slight seepage.3.Trial pit terminated at 4.30m due to collapsing of sidewalls.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP12
TP12REL00396
3.20
3.30-3.603.30
4.30
B1D3
BD
Soft grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY with somecobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Very loose wet silty clayey fine to medium grainedSAND(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 4.30 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.No water encountered.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP13
TP13REL00396
0.20
1.00
1.101.10-1.50
1.101.101.101.10
2.10
D1
B1D2
D3
D
BD
D
SV 30324550
Loose black-brown sandy gravel with frequent cobbleof brick and sandstone. Gravel is predominantlyfine to coarse subangular ash, clinker, brick,concrete and sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Soft to firm grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subangularto subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.No water encountered.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP13
TP13REL00396
4.40
Soft to firm grey-brown silty sandy gravelly CLAY.Gravel is predominantly fine to coarse subangularto subrounded sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 4.40 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.No water encountered.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP14
TP14REL00396
0.20
0.60
0.70
1.20
1.30
1.50
1.60-2.001.60
D1
D2/J1
D3/J2
B1D4
D
D/J
D/J
BD
Loose grey locally bituminous sandy gravel. Gravelis predominantly fine to coarse subangularlimestone(MADE GROUND)
...becoming cobbly below 0.50m
Stiff brown variable sandy gravelly clay withcobbles of sandstone. Gravel is predominantly fineto medium subangular to subrounded sandstone(MADE GROUND)
Loose black sandy gravel with occasional cobble ofsandstone. Gravel is predominantly fine to coarsesubangular ash, clinker, brick and sandstone(MADE GROUND)...with a length of metal encountered at 1.30m
Soft grey-brown sandy silty gravelly CLAY withfrequent cobble of sandstone. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
Continued on next sheet
1:20
Sheet 1 of 2
LegendDepth
Project No:
Description of Strata(m)
Sample
Ref
Sample
Type
Field
TypeTest
FieldTest
Result
Ground-
Water
Remarks:
Project: Client:
Logged:
Date: Approved:
Checked: Field Book Ref: Plant:
Scale:
Drawing No.
Key: B = Bulk Sample D = Disturbed Sample SV = Shear Vane (kN/m ) P = Penetrometer (kN/m )2 2
W = Water Sample
J = Jar Sample V = Vial Sample = Water Strike (m) = Steady Water Level (m)
Station Road, Padiham
1.Trial pit sides stable.2.No water encountered.
26/10/2012
GSGS1201
Renaissance Land RegenerationLtd
JCB 3CX
TP14
TP14REL00396
3.80
Soft grey-brown sandy silty gravelly CLAY withfrequent cobble of sandstone. Gravel ispredominantly fine to coarse subangular sandstone(POSSIBLE REWORKED NATURAL STRATA)
End of Trial Pit at 3.80 m
1:20
Sheet 2 of 2
APPENDIX VI
Laboratory Test Results
5 – 7 Hexthorpe Road, Hexthorpe,
Doncaster DN4 0AR
tel: +44 (0)844 815 6641
fax: +44 (0)844 815 6642
e-mail: rgunson@prosoils.co.uk
awatkins@prosoils.co.uk
A copy of the Laboratory Schedule of accredited tests as issued by UKAS is attached to this report. This certificate is
issued in accordance with the accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. The results
reported herein relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory. This certificate shall not be reproduced in full,
without the prior written approval of the laboratory.
Checked and Approved Signatories:
R Gunson A Watkins M Beastall
(Director) (Director) (Laboratory Manager)
Page 1 of
LABO RATO RY
REPO RT
4043
Contract Number: PSL12/3938
Client’s Reference: Report Date: 27 November 2012
Client Name: Geodyne
The Granary
Church Lane
Thrumpton
Nottingham
NG11 0AX
For the attention of: Gareth Smith
Contract Title: Padiham
Date Received: 7-Nov-12
Date Commenced: 7-Nov-12
Date Completed: 27-Nov-12
Notes: Observations and Interpretations are outside the UKAS Accreditation
* Denotes test not included in laboratory scope of accreditation
$ Denotes test carried out by approved contractor
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
Hole Sample Sample Depth Description of Sample
Number Number Type m
TP1 1.00 Brown slightly sandy silty CLAY.
TP12 3.30-3.60 Grey slightly clayey silty SAND.
WS4 2.30-2.80 Brown gravelly sandy CLAY.
WS5 2.80-3.20 Brown slightly gravelly sandy CLAY.
WS7 1.50-2.00 Grey gravelly slightly sandy CLAY.
Compiled by Date Checked by Date Approved by Date
26/11/12 27/11/12 27/11/12
Contract No:
Client Ref:PADIHAM.
PSL12/3938
32190
Page of .
SUMMARY OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTS(B.S. 1377 : PART 2 : 1990)
Moisture Bulk Dry Particle Liquid Plastic Plasticity %
Hole Sample Sample Depth Content Density Density Density Limit Limit Index Passing Remarks
Number Number Type m % Mg/m3
Mg/m3
Mg/m3
% % % .425mm
Clause 3.2 Clause 7.2 Clause 7.2 Clause 8. Clause 4.3/4.4 Clause 5. Clause 6.
TP1 1.00 34 62 29 33 100
TP12 3.30-3.60 25 NP
WS4 2.30-2.80 29 46 22 24 87
WS5 2.80-3.20 18 33 14 19 96
WS7 1.50-2.00 13 37 20 17 86
SYMBOLS : NP : Non Plastic * : Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Wet Sieved.
Compiled by Date Checked by Date Approved by Date
26/11/12 27/11/12 27/11/12
PSL12/3938
32190
Intermediate plasticity CI.
High plasticity CH.
Intermediate plasticity CI.
Low plasticity CL.
PADIHAM.Contract No:
Client Ref:
PSLR002 Issue 1 Jun 06 Page of .
PLASTICITY CHART FOR CASAGRANDE CLASSIFICATION.
(B.S.5930 : 1999)
Compiled by Date Checked by Date Approved by Date
26/11/12 27/11/12 27/11/12
PSL12/3938
32190PADIHAM.
Contract No:
Client Ref:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Liquid Limit (LL%).
Pla
sticity In
de
x (
PI%
).
CL CI CH CV CE
ML MI MH MV ME
PSLR002 Issue 1 Jun 06 Page of .
Page 1 of 10
Units 7 & 8 Sandpits Business Park Mottram Road, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 3AR
FINAL ANALYTICAL TEST REPORT
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Issue Number: 2 Date: 12 December, 2012
Client: GeoDyne (Nottingham) The Granary Church Lane Thrumpton Nottingham Nottinghamshire UK NG11 0AX
Project Manager: Gareth Smith Project Name: Station Road, Padiham Project Ref: 32190 Order No: 32190/GJS Date Samples Received: 08/11/12 Date Instructions Received: 08/11/12 Date Analysis Completed: 12/12/12
Prepared by: Approved by:
Melanie Marshall Carolyn Field Laboratory Coordinator Client Service Manager
Notes - Soil analysisAll results are reported as dry weight (<40°C). For samples with Matrix Codes 1 - 6 inert stones >10mm are removed or excluded from the sample prior to analysis and reported results corrected to a whole sample basis. For samples with Matrix Code 7 the whole sample is dried and crushed prior to analysis. Notes - GeneralSubscript "A" indicates analysis performed on the sample as received, "D" indicates analysis performed on the dried sample. All analysis is performed on the dried and crushed sample for samples with Matrix Code 7 and this supercedes any "A" subscripts. Superscript "M" indicates method accredited to MCERTS. For complex, multi-compound analysis, quality control results do not always fall within chart limits for every compound and we have criteria for reporting in these situations. If results are in italic font they are associated with such quality control failures and may be unreliable. A deviating samples report is appended and will indicate if samples or tests have been found to be deviating. Any test results affected may not be an accurate record of the concentration at the time of sampling. Predominant Matrix Codes - 1 = SAND, 2 = LOAM, 3 = CLAY, 4 = LOAM/SAND, 5 = SAND/CLAY, 6 = CLAY/LOAM, 7 = OTHER. Samples with Matrix Code 7 are not predominantly a SAND/LOAM/CLAY mix and are not covered by our MCERTS accreditation. Secondary Matrix Codes - A = contains stones, B = contains construction rubble, C = contains visible hydrocarbons, D = contains glass/metal, E = contains roots/twigs. IS indicates Insufficient sample for analysis. NDP indicates No Determination Possible. NAD indicates No Asbestos Detected. Superscript # indicates method accredited to ISO 17025. Analytical results reflect the quality of the sample at the time of analysis only. Opinions and interpretations expressed are outside the scope of our accreditation. Please contact us if you need any further information.
Page 2 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/1 12/05194/2 12/05194/3 12/05194/4 12/05194/5 12/05194/6 12/05194/7 12/05194/8
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP3 TP7 TP12 WS4 WS5 WS7 WS8 TP9
Depth to Top 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.20 0.70
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 26-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 4AE 4ABE 5AE 4AE 5AE 6ABE 4A 5A
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
Asbestos in soilD# - - NAD - - - - - A-T-045
pHDM# 9.63 8.50 8.35 8.24 8.20 8.59 7.64 8.11 pH A-T-031s
Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - 0.11 - - - 0.04 0.03 - g/l A-T-026s
Total Organic CarbonDM# 3.63 1.65 20.1 12.6 7.69 5.02 23.9 1.38 % w/w A-T-032s
ArsenicDM# 5 16 25 48 27 22 40 7 mg/kg A-T-024
CadmiumDM# 0.6 1.6 1.9 4.1 2.7 2.1 3.4 2.0 mg/kg A-T-024
CopperDM# 14 20 127 83 62 56 219 29 mg/kg A-T-024
ChromiumD# 11 21 18 20 20 25 20 25 mg/kg A-T-024
Chromium (hexavalent)D <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 mg/kg A-T-040s
Chromium (trivalent) 11 21 18 20 20 25 20 25 mg/kg Calc
LeadDM# 25 35 87 240 152 154 187 24 mg/kg A-T-024
MercuryD 0.28 0.19 <0.17 <0.17 0.24 0.47 1.10 <0.17 mg/kg A-T-024
NickelDM# 9 22 31 32 30 38 48 33 mg/kg A-T-024
SeleniumDM# 1 <1 <1 2 2 <1 2 2 mg/kg A-T-024
ZincDM# 47 98 122 102 104 106 131 83 mg/kg A-T-024
Page 3 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/1 12/05194/2 12/05194/3 12/05194/4 12/05194/5 12/05194/6 12/05194/7 12/05194/8
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP3 TP7 TP12 WS4 WS5 WS7 WS8 TP9
Depth to Top 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.20 0.70
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 26-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 4AE 4ABE 5AE 4AE 5AE 6ABE 4A 5A
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
PAH 16
Acenaphthene AM# 1.2 <0.1 0.2 2.7 0.4 <0.1 0.2 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s
Acenaphthylene AM# 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.9 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Anthracene AM# 1.3 <0.1 0.3 2.8 0.3 <0.1 0.6 0.6 mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(a)anthracene AM# 6.7 0.3 1.4 23.7 1.2 <0.1 1.9 0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(a)pyrene AM# 5.4 0.3 1.1 22.5 1.0 <0.1 1.5 0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(b)fluoranthene AM# 7.6 0.4 1.6 29.7 1.3 0.1 1.9 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(ghi)perylene AM# 4.2 0.3 1.1 17.3 0.9 <0.1 1.3 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(k)fluoranthene AM# 1.2 <0.1 0.2 4.6 0.2 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Chrysene AM# 7.4 0.4 1.6 24.8 1.3 <0.1 2.0 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene AM# 1.1 <0.1 0.3 4.0 0.2 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Fluoranthene AM# 13.4 0.7 2.5 42.6 2.6 0.1 3.6 0.3 mg/kg A-T-019s
Fluorene AM# 0.9 <0.1 <0.1 1.5 0.2 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Indeno(123-cd)pyrene AM# 2.9 0.2 0.8 12.2 0.5 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-019s
Naphthalene AM# 1.0 <0.1 0.2 3.0 0.4 <0.1 0.6 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s
Phenanthrene AM# 9.2 0.5 1.7 17.8 1.5 0.2 3.1 0.5 mg/kg A-T-019s
Pyrene AM# 11.0 0.6 2.2 38.7 2.5 0.2 3.0 0.2 mg/kg A-T-019s
Total PAH AM# 74.6 3.6 14.9 249 14.2 1.2 21.3 2.9 mg/kg A-T-019s
Page 4 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/1 12/05194/2 12/05194/3 12/05194/4 12/05194/5 12/05194/6 12/05194/7 12/05194/8
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP3 TP7 TP12 WS4 WS5 WS7 WS8 TP9
Depth to Top 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.20 0.70
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 26-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 4AE 4ABE 5AE 4AE 5AE 6ABE 4A 5A
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
TPH CWG
Ali >C5-C6A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C6-C8A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C8-C10A# - - - 0.02 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C10-C12A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C12-C16A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C16-C21A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C21-C35A# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Total AliphaticsA# - - - <0.1 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s
Aro >C5-C7A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C7-C8A# - - - <0.01 - 0.05 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C8-C9A# - - - <0.01 - 0.02 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C9-C10A# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C10-C12A# - - - 5.2 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C12-C16A# - - - 16.2 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C16-C21A# - - - 28.6 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C21-C35A# - - - 39.5 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Total AromaticsA# - - - 89.5 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s
TPH (Ali & Aro)A# - - - 89.5 - <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s
BTEX - BenzeneA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - TolueneA# - - - <0.01 - 0.05 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - Ethyl BenzeneA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - m & p XyleneA# - - - <0.01 - 0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - o XyleneA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
MTBEA# - - - <0.01 - <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Page 5 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/9 12/05194/10 12/05194/11 12/05194/12 12/05194/13 12/05194/14 12/05194/15 12/05194/16
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP11 TP14 WS1 WS7 TP1 TP1 TP1 TP6
Depth to Top 1.00 1.60 2.10 1.10 1.75 2.60 3.00 0.50
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 5 5A 5A 5A 1A 7 3A 5
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
Asbestos in soilD# - - - - - - - - A-T-045
pHDM# 7.09 8.07 7.53 8.49 - - - - pH A-T-031s
Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - - 0.04 - - - - - g/l A-T-026s
Total Organic CarbonDM# 1.69 1.25 0.76 0.86 - - - - % w/w A-T-032s
ArsenicDM# 5 3 5 3 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
CadmiumDM# 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.8 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
CopperDM# 15 20 18 22 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
ChromiumD# 30 27 29 29 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
Chromium (hexavalent)D <1 <1 <1 <1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-040s
Chromium (trivalent) 30 25 26 28 - - - - mg/kg Calc
LeadDM# 33 18 17 16 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
MercuryD <0.17 0.24 <0.17 0.24 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
NickelDM# 18 26 27 27 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
SeleniumDM# 2 <1 2 <1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
ZincDM# 61 64 84 63 - - - - mg/kg A-T-024
Page 6 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/9 12/05194/10 12/05194/11 12/05194/12 12/05194/13 12/05194/14 12/05194/15 12/05194/16
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP11 TP14 WS1 WS7 TP1 TP1 TP1 TP6
Depth to Top 1.00 1.60 2.10 1.10 1.75 2.60 3.00 0.50
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 5 5A 5A 5A 1A 7 3A 5
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
PAH 16
Acenaphthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Acenaphthylene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Anthracene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(a)anthracene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.7 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(a)pyrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(b)fluoranthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(ghi)perylene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Benzo(k)fluoranthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Chrysene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.8 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Fluoranthene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Fluorene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Indeno(123-cd)pyrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Naphthalene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.6 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Phenanthrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 2.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Pyrene AM# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1.4 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Total PAH AM# <0.1 0.3 <0.1 10.5 - - - - mg/kg A-T-019s
Page 7 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/9 12/05194/10 12/05194/11 12/05194/12 12/05194/13 12/05194/14 12/05194/15 12/05194/16
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP11 TP14 WS1 WS7 TP1 TP1 TP1 TP6
Depth to Top 1.00 1.60 2.10 1.10 1.75 2.60 3.00 0.50
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 5 5A 5A 5A 1A 7 3A 5
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
TPH CWG
Ali >C5-C6A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C6-C8A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C8-C10A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C10-C12A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C12-C16A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C16-C21A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C21-C35A# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Total AliphaticsA# - - - - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-022+23s
Aro >C5-C7A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C7-C8A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C8-C9A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C9-C10A# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C10-C12A# - - - - <0.1 1.6 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C12-C16A# - - - - <0.1 12.2 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C16-C21A# - - - - <0.1 26.5 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C21-C35A# - - - - <0.1 12.8 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-023s
Total AromaticsA# - - - - <0.1 53.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-022+23s
TPH (Ali & Aro)A# - - - - <0.1 53.1 <0.1 <0.1 mg/kg A-T-022+23s
BTEX - BenzeneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - TolueneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - Ethyl BenzeneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - m & p XyleneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - o XyleneA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
MTBEA# - - - - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/kg A-T-022s
Page 8 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/17 12/05194/18 12/05194/19 12/05194/20 12/05194/22 12/05194/23 12/05194/24 12/05194/25
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP8 WS2 WS2 WS2 WS5 WS8 TP9 TP10
Depth to Top 1.50 2.10 2.70 3.80 0.50 0.90 0.30 0.10
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 5A 5A 5A 7 5A 5
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
Asbestos in soilD# - - - - - - NAD NAD A-T-045
pHDM# - - - 8.37 - - - - pH A-T-031s
Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - - - 0.03 - - - - g/l A-T-026s
Page 9 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/17 12/05194/18 12/05194/19 12/05194/20 12/05194/22 12/05194/23 12/05194/24 12/05194/25
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP8 WS2 WS2 WS2 WS5 WS8 TP9 TP10
Depth to Top 1.50 2.10 2.70 3.80 0.50 0.90 0.30 0.10
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 5A 5A 5A 7 5A 5
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
TPH CWG
Ali >C5-C6A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C6-C8A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C8-C10A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Ali >C10-C12A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C12-C16A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C16-C21A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Ali >C21-C35A# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Total AliphaticsA# <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s
Aro >C5-C7A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C7-C8A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C8-C9A# 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C9-C10A# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Aro >C10-C12A# <0.1 <0.1 0.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C12-C16A# <0.1 <0.1 3.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C16-C21A# <0.1 <0.1 7.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Aro >C21-C35A# <0.1 <0.1 11.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-023s
Total AromaticsA# <0.1 <0.1 22.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s
TPH (Ali & Aro)A# <0.1 <0.1 22.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - mg/kg A-T-022+23s
BTEX - BenzeneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - TolueneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - Ethyl BenzeneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - m & p XyleneA# 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
BTEX - o XyleneA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
MTBEA# <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - - mg/kg A-T-022s
Page 10 of 10
Envirolab Job Number: 12/05194 Client Project Name: Station Road, Padiham
Client Project Ref: 32190
Lab Sample ID 12/05194/26 12/05194/27 12/05194/28 12/05194/29 12/05194/30 12/05194/31 12/05194/32 12/05194/33
Client Sample No
Client Sample ID TP11 TP13 TP14 TP12 WS5 WS7 TP9 TP13
Depth to Top 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.20 6.50 2.50 1.70 1.10
Depth To Bottom
Date Sampled 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 25-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12 26-Oct-12
Sample Type Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil
Sample Matrix Code 5 5A 5A 5 5A
Un
its
Met
ho
d r
ef
Asbestos in soilD# NAD NAD NAD - - - - - A-T-045
pHDM# - - - 7.58 8.00 8.18 8.54 8.32 pH A-T-031s
Sulphate (water sol 2:1)DM# - - - <0.01 0.01 0.07 0.03 0.17 g/l A-T-026s
APPENDIX VII
Historical Plans
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.260
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 1A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And FurnessPublished 1891Source map scale - 1:500The 1:500 scale Ordnance Survey mapping was introduced in 1855 as a replacement for the 1:528 scale and to compliment the 1:2500 scale that had been implemented in 1853. By 1895, the 1:500 scale covered most towns over a population of about 4000 at the time of survey, although very few towns were mapped more than once at this scale, and none have been since 1910. The 1:500 scale gives particular emphasis to such features as lamp posts, man holes, arched passages and minor building projections. Also oftenfeatured are divisions between tenements, interior ground floor layouts of public buildings, and on earlier plans, the functions of the various parts of larger industrial premises are also indicated. Content of the plans does vary however, from one town to the next in terms of, for example, the completeness of railway tracks and the coverage of public buildings.
Please note: Due to the partial coverage of Historical Town Plans, it is possible that not all segments within an order will contain mapping. Only the segments that have Town Plan coverage will be generated.
Historical Town Plan - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Historical Map - Slice A
Ordnance Survey County Series 1:10,560 Ordnance Survey Plan 1:10,000 1:10,000 Raster Mapping
Historical Mapping Legends
Historical Mapping & Photography included:
Lancashire And Furness
Yorkshire
Lancashire And Furness
Yorkshire
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
Burnley
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
10K Raster Mapping
10K Raster Mapping
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1848
1848
1894 - 1895
1896
1913 - 1914
1929
1932
1938
1955 - 1956
1965
1976
1977 - 1979
1988
1990 - 1991
2006
2012
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Mapping Type Scale Date Pg
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Russian Map - Slice A
1:5,000 and 1:10,000 mapping 1:25,000 mapping
Russian Military Mapping Legends
Historical Mapping & Photography included:
Lancashire And Furness
Yorkshire
Lancashire And Furness
Yorkshire
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
Burnley
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
10K Raster Mapping
10K Raster Mapping
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1848
1848
1894 - 1895
1896
1913 - 1914
1929
1932
1938
1955 - 1956
1965
1976
1977 - 1979
1988
1990 - 1991
2006
2012
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Mapping Type Scale Date Pg
Key to Numbers on Mapping
SD73SE_Burnley
No. Description
19 Post Office
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1848
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 4 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Yorkshire
Published 1848
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 5 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1894 - 1895
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 6 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Yorkshire
Published 1896
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 7 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1913 - 1914
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 8 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1929
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 9 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1932
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 10 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1938
Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 11 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1955 - 1956
Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 12 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1965
Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 13 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Burnley
Published 1976
Source map scale - 1:10,000These maps were produced by the Russian military during the Cold War between 1950 and 1997, and cover 103 towns and cities throughout the U.K. The maps are produced at 1:25,000, 1:10,000 and 1:5,000 scale, and show detailed land use, with colour-coded areas for development, green areas, andnon-developed areas. Buildings are coloured black and important building uses (such as hospitals, post offices, factories etc.) are numbered, with a numbered key describing their use. They were produced by the Russians for the benefit of navigation, as well as strategic military sites and transport hubs, for use if they were to have invaded the U.K. The detailed information provided indicates that the areas were surveyed using land-based personnel, on the ground, in the cities that are mapped.
Russian Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 14 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1977 - 1979
Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 15 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1988
Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 16 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1990 - 1991
Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 17 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
10k Raster Mapping
Published 2006
Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were produced from the Ordnance Survey`s 1:10,000 colour raster mapping. These maps are derived from Landplan which replaced the old 1:10,000 maps originally published in 1970. The data is highly detailed showing buildings, fences and field boundaries as well as allroads, tracks and paths. Road names are also included together with the relevant road number and classification. Boundary information depiction includes county, unitary authority, district, civil parish and constituency.
dummy
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 18 of 18A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
10k Raster Mapping
Published 2012
Source map scale - 1:10,000The historical maps shown were produced from the Ordnance Survey`s 1:10,000 colour raster mapping. These maps are derived from Landplan which replaced the old 1:10,000 maps originally published in 1970. The data is highly detailed showing buildings, fences and field boundaries as well as allroads, tracks and paths. Road names are also included together with the relevant road number and classification. Boundary information depiction includes county, unitary authority, district, civil parish and constituency.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Historical Map - Segment A13
Ordnance Survey County Series and
Ordnance Survey Plan 1:2,500
Ordnance Survey Plan, Additional SIMs and
Supply of Unpublished Survey Information
1:2,500 and 1:1,250
Large-Scale National Grid Data 1:2,500 and
1:1,250
Historical Mapping Legends
Historical Mapping & Photography included:
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Lancashire And Furness
Ordnance Survey Plan
Additional SIMs
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
Additional SIMs
Ordnance Survey Plan
Large-Scale National Grid Data
Large-Scale National Grid Data
1:2,500
1:2,500
1:2,500
1:1,250
1:1,250
1:2,500
1:1,250
1:2,500
1:2,500
1:1,250
1:1,250
1:1,250
1891 - 1893
1912
1931
1957 - 1965
1958 - 1990
1960
1965 - 1990
1969
1981
1990
1993
1994 - 1995
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Mapping Type Scale Date Pg
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1891 - 1893
Source map scale - 1:2,500The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1912
Source map scale - 1:2,500The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 4 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Lancashire And Furness
Published 1931
Source map scale - 1:2,500The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 5 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1957 - 1965
Source map scale - 1:1,250The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 6 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Additional SIMs
Published 1958 - 1990
Source map scale - 1:1,250The SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's `Survey of Information on Microfilm') are further, minor editions of mapping which were produced and published in between the main editions as an area was updated. They date from 1947 to 1994, and contain detailed information on buildings, roads and land-use. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 7 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1960
Source map scale - 1:2,500The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 8 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1965 - 1990
Source map scale - 1:1,250The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 9 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1969
Source map scale - 1:2,500The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 10 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Additional SIMs
Published 1981
Source map scale - 1:2,500The SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's `Survey of Information on Microfilm') are further, minor editions of mapping which were produced and published in between the main editions as an area was updated. They date from 1947 to 1994, and contain detailed information on buildings, roads and land-use. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 11 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1990
Source map scale - 1:1,250The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of GreatBritain. The published date given below is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 12 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Large-Scale National Grid Data
Published 1993
Source map scale - 1:1,250'Large Scale National Grid Data' superseded SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's 'Survey of Information on Microfilm') in 1992, and continued to be produced until 1999. These maps were the fore-runners of digital mapping and so provide detailed information on houses and roads, but tend to show less topographic features such as vegetation. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26100
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 13 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Large-Scale National Grid Data
Published 1994 - 1995
Source map scale - 1:1,250'Large Scale National Grid Data' superseded SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's 'Survey of Information on Microfilm') in 1992, and continued to be produced until 1999. These maps were the fore-runners of digital mapping and so provide detailed information on houses and roads, but tend to show less topographic features such as vegetation. These maps were produced at both 1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
APPENDIX VIII
Landmark Envirocheck Report
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Datasheet
Order Details:
Order Number:
Customer Reference:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
Site Details:
Client Details:
Prepared For:
41967635_1_1
REL00396
379300, 433600
A
2.26
250
Station RoadPadiham
Ms L DanielsGeoDyne LtdThe GranaryChurch LaneThrumptonNG11 0AX
Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited
Report:®Envirocheck
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Agency & Hydrological
Waste
Hazardous Substances
Geological
Industrial Land Use
Sensitive Land Use
Data Currency
Data Suppliers
Useful Contacts
Introduction
Copyright Notice
Natural England Copyright Notice
Ove Arup Copyright Notice
Peter Brett Associates Copyright Notice
Radon Potential dataset Copyright Notice
The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client.
In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.
© Landmark Information Group Limited 2012. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck® Report ("Report") is the property of Landmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency and Natural England, and must not be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions accepted by the Customer. A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the Index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.
Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar, Special Protection Area, Special Conservation Area, Marine Nature Reserve data (derived from Ordnance Survey 1:10000 raster) is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data.
The Data provided in this report was obtained on Licence from Ove Arup & Partners Limited (for further information, contact mining.review@arup.com). No reproduction or further use of such Data is to be made without the prior written consent of Ove Arup & Partners Limited. The information and data supplied in the product are derived from publicly available records and other third party sources and neither Ove Arup & Partners nor Landmark warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or data.
The cavity data presented has been extracted from the PBA enhanced version of the original DEFRA national cavity databases. PBA/DEFRA retain the copyright & intellectual property rights in the data. Whilst all reasonable efforts are made to check that the information contained in the cavity databases is accurate we do not warrant that the data is complete or error free. The information is based upon our own researches and those collated from a number of external sources and is continually being augmented and updated by PBA. In no event shall PBA/DEFRA or Landmark be liable for any loss or damage including, without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from the use of this data.
Information supplied from a joint dataset compiled by The British Geological Survey and the Health Protection Agency.
Report Section Page Number
Contents
Report Version v47.0
-
1
13
-
17
20
-
23
28
29
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Data TypePage
NumberOn Site
Agency & Hydrological
Waste
0 to 250m
Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices
Discharge Consents
Enforcement and Prohibition Notices
Integrated Pollution Controls
Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements
Nearest Surface Water Feature
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes
Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters
Registered Radioactive Substances
River Quality
River Quality Biology Sampling Points
River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points
Substantiated Pollution Incident Register
Water Abstractions
Water Industry Act Referrals
Groundwater Vulnerability
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Source Protection Zones
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences
Flood Water Storage Areas
Flood Defences
BGS Recorded Landfill Sites
Historical Landfill Sites
Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites
Registered Landfill Sites
Registered Waste Transfer Sites
Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites
1
1
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
16
2
Yes
28
1
1
1
1
n/a
n/a
n/a
Yes
Yes
Yes
3
4
1
1
2
1
(*3)
(*up to 500m)
pg 1
pg 4
pg 5
pg 5
pg 10
pg 10
pg 10
pg 10
pg 10
pg 11
pg 11
pg 11
pg 11
pg 11
pg 12
pg 13
pg 13
pg 14
pg 15
pg 15
pg 16
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Data TypePage
NumberOn Site
Hazardous Substances
Geological
Industrial Land Use
0 to 250m
Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)
Explosive Sites
Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)
Planning Hazardous Substance Consents
Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Recorded Mineral Sites
BGS Urban Soil Chemistry
BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages
Brine Compensation Area
Coal Mining Affected Areas
Mining Instability
Man-Made Mining Cavities
Natural Cavities
Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas
Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Fuel Station Entries
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
Yes
n/a
n/a
n/a
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
n/a
29
(*up to 500m)
pg 17
pg 17
pg 18
pg 18
pg 18
pg 19
pg 19
pg 19
pg 19
pg 20
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Data TypePage
NumberOn Site
Sensitive Land Use
0 to 250m
Areas of Adopted Green Belt
Areas of Unadopted Green Belt
Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Forest Parks
Local Nature Reserves
Marine Nature Reserves
National Nature Reserves
National Parks
Nitrate Sensitive Areas
Nitrate Vulnerable Zones
Ramsar Sites
Sites of Special Scientific Interest
Special Areas of Conservation
Special Protection Areas
(*up to 500m)
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 1 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
1
2
2
3
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
A13NW(NW)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(N)
89
94
94
178
1
1
1
1
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:
Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyAdjacent To Padiham Leisure Centre Cso, Park Road, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)017190925131st March 20072nd November 2006Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderNew Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as
amended by Environment Act 1995)
Located by supplier to within 10m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyRear Perseverance Mill Cso, Waterside Mews, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRiver Calder (Wyre)01719082311st March 200810th March 200627th November 2006Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
Green Brook Trib Of R CalderAuthorisation revokedRevokedLocated by supplier to within 10m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyRear Perseverance Mill Cso, Waterside Mews, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002011st January 19951st January 199528th February 2008Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderConsent revoked or revised: New Consent issued (Section 37(1))Located by supplier to within 100m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyInskip Street, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur002223rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderVaried under EPR 2010Located by supplier to within 10m
379120433690
379480433690
379480433690
379390433840
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 2 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
3
3
3
4
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13SE(SE)
178
208
208
183
1
1
1
1
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:
Positional Accuracy:
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyInskip Street, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002211st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderPost National Rivers Authority Legislation where issue date > 31/08/1989Located by supplier to within 100m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyStation Road, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur001823rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderVaried under EPR 2010Located by supplier to within 10m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyStation Road, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR001811st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderPost National Rivers Authority Legislation where issue date > 31/08/1989Located by supplier to within 100m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur0027231st March 200510th December 2004Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderModified (Water Resources Act 1991, Schedule 10 as amended by
Environment Act 1995)
Located by supplier to within 10m
379390433840
379370433870
379370433870
379570433450
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 3 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
4
4
5
5
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
A13SE(SE)
A13SE(SE)
A13NE(E)
A13NE(E)
197
197
214
214
1
1
1
1
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur003323rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderVaried under EPR 2010Located by supplier to within 10m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR003311st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderPost National Rivers Authority Legislation where issue date > 31/08/1989Located by supplier to within 100m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyOpp 76 Burnley Road, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur002123rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderVaried under EPR 2010Located by supplier to within 10m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyOpp 76 Burnley Road, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002111st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderPost National Rivers Authority Legislation where issue date > 31/08/1989Located by supplier to within 100m
379580433440
379580433440
379600433720
379600433720
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 4 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
6
7
8
8
9
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
A14SW(SE)
A13SW(SW)
A13NW(N)
A13NW(N)
A13NE(NE)
232
245
249
249
0
1
1
1
1
2
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:DischargeEnvironment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Authority:Permit Reference:Dated:Process Type:Description:Status:Positional Accuracy:
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyThompson Street (Levant Mill), Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot Given01BUR002711st January 1995Not Supplied30th March 2005Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderConsent revoked or revised: New Consent issued (Section 37(1))Located by supplier to within 10m
Central Electricity Generating Board (Nw Region)Production & Distribution Of ElectricityPadiham B Power Station, Padiham, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder - Lancs01627A126th March 195826th March 19587th April 1993Trade Discharges - Cooling WaterFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderAuthorisation revokedRevokedLocated by supplier to within 100m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyShuttleworth/Calder St, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01bur002423rd September 20103rd September 2010Not SuppliedPublic Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderVaried under EPR 2010Located by supplier to within 10m
United Utilities Water PlcSewerage Network - Sewers - Water CompanyShuttleworth/Calder St, Burnley, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCalder (Ribble)01BUR002411st January 1995Not Supplied2nd September 2010Public Sewage: Storm Sewage OverflowFreshwater Stream/River
River CalderPost National Rivers Authority Legislation where issue date > 31/08/1989Located by supplier to within 100m
Ej Riley LtdRiley House, Station Road, Padiham, BURNLEY, Lancashire, BB12 7ARBurnley Borough Council, Planning and EnvironmentCP 1415th March 1996Local Authority Air Pollution ControlPG6/33 Wood coatingAuthorisation revokedRevokedManually positioned to the address or location
379630433450
379003433400
379260433900
379260433900
379356433639
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 5 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
10
10
11
12
13
13
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
Nearest Surface Water Feature
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
A13NW(W)
A13NW(W)
A13NE(NE)
A13SE(E)
A13NE(E)
92
92
44
0
40
68
70
2
2
-
1
1
1
1
Name:Location:Authority:Permit Reference:Dated:Process Type:Description:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Authority:Permit Reference:Dated:Process Type:Description:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Skillings Crushing Company LtdThe Yard, Padiham, Bb12 8edBurnley Borough Council, Planning and EnvironmentLAPPC/Mineral 218th July 2008Local Authority Pollution Prevention and ControlPG3/16 Mobile screening and crushing processesPermittedLocated by supplier to within 100m
Skillings Crushing Company LtdThe Yard, Park Road, Padiham, Bb12 8edBurnley Borough Council, Planning and EnvironmentLAPPC/MIneral 125th July 2007Local Authority Pollution Prevention and ControlPG3/16 Mobile screening and crushing processesPermittedLocated by supplier to within 10m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - UnknownRiver Calder15th November 199191330357Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Textile industryGreen Brook , PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Paints / DyesGreen Brook; Trade Effluent12th March 199797330063Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverLeaking Underground PipeCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionAgricultural: CarcassesRiver Calder18th February 199595330040Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Detergents/SurfactantGreen Brook/Sweet4th October 199494330257Calder - LancsNot GivenMiscellaneous/Other Pollution TypeCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
379150433500
379150433500
379105433601
379200433600
379400433700
379500433595
379500433600
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 6 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
13
14
15
16
16
16
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
A13SE(E)
A13SE(SE)
A13SW(SW)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(NE)
73
98
108
114
117
119
1
1
1
1
1
1
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot GivenGreen Brook; None Pollution Found26th May 199393330148Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Garage PremisesMinisport Limited, Thompson Street, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - Vehicle Washings And De WaxingGreen Bk; Trade Effluent16th May 199797330134Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverOther CauseCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Industrial: OtherBurnley Pallets Limited, Park Road, PENDLEBURYEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubbishRiver Calder; Partially Burnt Pallets16th May 199797330133Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverVandalismCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubble/Litter Or SolidsGreen Bk; Rubbish2nd April 199696330036Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - OtherGreen Brook; Wood Ash22nd December 199494330318Calder - LancsNot GivenMiscellaneous/Other Pollution TypeCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Industrial: OtherRiver Calder At , PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - Waste OilRiver Calder; Waste Oil9th July 199797330162Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverAccidental Spillage/LeakageCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
379505433595
379500433500
379100433500
379500433695
379500433700
379505433695
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 7 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
17
18
18
19
20
20
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(NE)
A13SE(SE)
A13SE(SE)
139
139
144
178
182
187
1
1
1
1
1
1
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Not GivenRiver Calder At , PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubbishRiver Calder; Empty Kegs7th January 199797330003Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionUnknownRiver Calder; No Pollution Found22nd August 199696330202Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - Inert Suspended SolidsRiver Calder5th January 199393330002Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenWaterside Mews, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - UnknownNot Supplied2nd November 1998CE981030Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubble/Litter Or SolidsGreen Bk; Solid Refuse3rd April 199696330072Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot GivenNo Pollution Found; None Pollution Found5th November 199393330307Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
379400433800
379300433795
379300433800
379500433800
379500433400
379500433395
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 8 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
21
21
21
22
22
22
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
A13SE(E)
A13SE(E)
A13SE(E)
A13NE(E)
A13NE(E)
A13NE(E)
183
185
189
202
204
206
1
1
1
1
1
1
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Water Company Sewage: Sewage Treatment WorksLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionIndustrial Solid WasteGreen Brook; Drums (Empty)7th January 199393330007Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Detergents/SurfactantGreen Brook/Sweet Cl18th November 199494330295Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Private Sewage (Non-PLC): Sewerage SystemsLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionCrude SewageGreen Bk; Sewage10th May 199696330115Calder - LancsNot GivenBlocked SewerCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - Vehicle Washings And De WaxingRiver Calder; Trade Effluent9th July 199696330164Calder - LancsNot GivenWrong ConnectionCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOils - UnknownRiver Calder11th September 199191330249Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - OtherRiver Calder; Trade Effluent8th July 199696330165Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
379600433500
379600433495
379605433495
379600433695
379600433700
379605433695
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 9 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
22
23
23
23
23
23
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
A13NE(E)
A13SE(SE)
A13SE(SE)
A13SE(SE)
A13SE(SE)
A13SE(SE)
209
239
239
243
243
246
1
1
1
1
1
1
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Not GivenRiver Calder, Kwick SaveEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOrganic Wastes: Animal CarcassesRiver Calder; Dead Sheep1st May 199797330125Calder - LancsFreshwater Stream/RiverUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionChemicals - Detergents/SurfactantGreen Brook6th April 199393330090Calder - LancsNot GivenUnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionNot GivenNone Pollution Found3rd February 199292330104Calder - LancsNot GivenNot GivenCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionRubble/Litter Or SolidsGreen Brook; Drums26th June 199595330146Calder - LancsNot GivenVandalismCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - FoamSweet Clough; Detergent2nd November 199494330279Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Not GivenLocation Description Not AvailableEnvironment Agency, North West RegionMiscellaneous - FoamSweet Clough/Green; Detergent11th November 199494330284Calder - LancsNot GivenOther Incident/UnknownCategory 2 - Significant IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
379605433700
379600433400
379605433405
379605433400
379600433395
379605433395
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 10 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
24
25
26
27
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes
Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters
River Quality
River Quality
Substantiated Pollution Incident Register
Water Abstractions
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13SE(E)
A13NW(W)
A13SE(SE)
A14SW(SE)
244
172
169
0
15
210
457
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Property Type:Location:Authority:Pollutant:Note:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Catchment Area:Receiving Water:Cause of Incident:Incident Severity:Positional Accuracy:
Location:Prosecution Text:Prosecution Act:Hearing Date:Verdict:Fine:Costs:Positional Accuracy:
Location:Prosecution Text:Prosecution Act:Hearing Date:Verdict:Fine:Cost:Positional Accuracy:
Name:GQA Grade:Reach:Estimated Distance (km):Flow Rate:Flow Type:Year:
Name:GQA Grade:Reach:Estimated Distance (km):Flow Rate:Flow Type:Year:
Authority:Incident Date:Incident Reference:Water Impact:Air Impact:Land Impact:Positional Accuracy:Pollutant:
Operator:Licence Number:Permit Version:Location:Authority:Abstraction:Abstraction Type:Source:Daily Rate (m3):Yearly Rate (m3):Details:Authorised Start:Authorised End:Permit Start Date:Permit End Date:Positional Accuracy:
Domestic & Residential: Private DwellingsStation Road, LancashireEnvironment Agency, North West RegionGeneral Biodegradable : Crude SewageNot Supplied28th May 199929233Not GivenNot GivenWrong ConnectionCategory 3 - Minor IncidentLocated by supplier to within 100m
Station Road, Padiham, Bb12Failure to store and control wasteEpa90 S34(1)(B) & (B)16th December 2004Guilty20002124Manually positioned within the geographical locality
Green Brook, Station Road, Padiham, Bb12Allowing harmful waste (including rayon and rubber) to enter a watercourseWra91 S85(1) & (6)16th December 2004Guilty100002124Manually positioned within the geographical locality
Green BkRiver Quality BQsl At Hapton Colliery To Calder3.6
Flow less than 0.31 cumecsRiver2000
CalderRiver Quality DPendle Water To Padiham Power Station5.7
Flow less than 5 cumecsRiver2000
Environment Agency - North West Region, North Area19th July 2004252102Category 2 - Significant IncidentCategory 4 - No ImpactCategory 4 - No ImpactLocated by supplier to within 10mCrude Sewage
R J Mountfourd-Aram3223Not SuppliedPadiham, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionIndustrial Processing ( Miscellaneous)Not SuppliedBrook38200092444000Additional Purpose - Cooling. Green Brook. Licence RevokedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 100m
379300433900
379312433829
379312433826
379384433592
379138433623
379606433454
379800433300
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 11 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
Water Abstractions
Water Abstractions
Groundwater Vulnerability
Drift Deposits
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
A14SW(SE)
A9NW(SE)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(S)
A13NW(W)
A13NW(NW)
A13NE(E)
A13NE(E)
460
480
0
0
0
0
0
3
7
13
13
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
Operator:Licence Number:Permit Version:Location:Authority:Abstraction:Abstraction Type:Source:Daily Rate (m3):Yearly Rate (m3):Details:Authorised Start:Authorised End:Permit Start Date:Permit End Date:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Licence Number:Permit Version:Location:Authority:Abstraction:Abstraction Type:Source:Daily Rate (m3):Yearly Rate (m3):Details:Authorised Start:Authorised End:Permit Start Date:Permit End Date:Positional Accuracy:
Soil Classification:
Map Sheet:Scale:
Drift Deposit:
Map Sheet:Scale:
Aquifer Desination:
Aquifer Designation:
Aquifer Designation:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
R J Mountford-Aram2671331001Not SuppliedGreen Brook, PADIHAMEnvironment Agency, North West RegionIndustrial Cooling & ManufacturingNot SuppliedSurface1737420250Additional Purposes: Cooling; Manufacturing; Licence Status: RevokedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 100m
Perseverence Mills Ltd26713310191Borehole At PadihamEnvironment Agency, North West RegionOther Industrial/Commercial/Public Services: General Use (Medium Loss)Water may be abstracted from a single pointGroundwaterNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot Supplied01 January31 December16th August 2002Not SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m
Soils of High Leaching Potential (U) - Soil information for restored mineral workings and urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere. A worst case vulnerability classification (H) assumed, until proved otherwiseSheet 10 Central Lancashire1:100,000
Low permeability drift deposits occuring at the surface and overlying Major andMinor Aquifers are head, clay-with-flints, brickearth, peat, river terrace depositsand marine and estuarine alluviumSheet 10 Central Lancashire1:100,000
Secondary Aquifer - A
Secondary Aquifer - A
Unproductive Strata
Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
379800433295
379790433250
379299433599
379299433599
379299433599
379293433652
379299433599
379146433598
379251433680
379418433635
379418433635
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 12 of 29
Agency & Hydrological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences
Flood Water Storage Areas
Flood Defences
Flood Defences
A13SW(W)
A13NW(NW)
A13SE(E)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(N)
37
39
49
71
123
169
1
1
1
1
1
1
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Reference:
Type:Reference:
Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Flood DefencesNot Supplied
Flood DefencesNot Supplied
None
None
379114433584
379142433678
379482433581
379404433738
379414433788
379386433830
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 13 of 29
Waste
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
28
29
30
31
32
Historical Landfill Sites
Historical Landfill Sites
Historical Landfill Sites
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
A13SW(W)
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(W)
A13NE(E)
76
97
178
16
47
1
1
1
1
1
Licence Holder:Location:Name:Operator Location:Boundary Accuracy:Provider Reference:First Input Date:Last Input Date:Specified Waste Type:EA Waste Ref:Regis Ref:WRC Ref:BGS Ref:Other Ref:
Licence Holder:Location:Name:Operator Location:Boundary Accuracy:Provider Reference:First Input Date:Last Input Date:Specified Waste Type:EA Waste Ref:Regis Ref:WRC Ref:BGS Ref:Other Ref:
Licence Holder:Location:Name:Operator Location:Boundary Accuracy:Provider Reference:First Input Date:Last Input Date:Specified Waste Type:EA Waste Ref:Regis Ref:WRC Ref:BGS Ref:Other Ref:
Licence Number:Location:Operator Name:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Licence Status:Issued:Last Modified:Expires:Suspended:Revoked:Surrendered:IPPC Reference:Positional Accuracy:
Licence Number:Location:Operator Name:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Licence Status:Issued:Last Modified:Expires:Suspended:Revoked:Surrendered:IPPC Reference:Positional Accuracy:
PoloLand off Blackburn Road, Simonstone, Burnley, LancashirePadiham Power StationNot SuppliedAs SuppliedEAHLD07351Not SuppliedNot SuppliedDeposited Waste included Inert, Industrial and Household Waste
Not SuppliedNot Supplied2300/0534Not SuppliedK1/23/034
British Gas PlcBritish Gas Holder Station, Park Road, Padiham, LancashireBritish GasNot SuppliedAs SuppliedEAHLD0699331st December 19878th March 1989Deposited Waste included Inert Waste
Not SuppliedNot Supplied2300/0580Not SuppliedL1/12/322, 100/322, K1/12/082, Licence No 253
Not SuppliedElizabeth Street, Padiham, Burnley, LancashireElizabeth StreetNot SuppliedAs SuppliedEAHLD06990Not SuppliedNot SuppliedDeposited Waste included Unknown Material
Not SuppliedNot Supplied2300/0535Not SuppliedK1/12/035
103970125 Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancs, BB12 7ANTaylor KevinNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaHCI Waste Transfer StationIssued13th June 2012Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m
101694Greenbridge Mill, Station Road, Padiham, Lancashire, BB12 8EFRecycled Parts LtdNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaVehicle depollution facilityIssued6th October 2010Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedManually positioned to the address or location
379079433562
379193433475
379128433415
379146433581
379462433624
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 14 of 29
Waste
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
33
33
34
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
Local Authority Landfill Coverage
Local Authority Landfill Coverage
Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
74
120
0
0
200
1
1
4
11
4
Licence Number:Location:Operator Name:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Licence Status:Issued:Last Modified:Expires:Suspended:Revoked:Surrendered:IPPC Reference:Positional Accuracy:
Licence Number:Location:Operator Name:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Licence Status:Issued:Last Modified:Expires:Suspended:Revoked:Surrendered:IPPC Reference:Positional Accuracy:
Name:
Name:
Location:Reference:Authority:Last Reported
Status:
Types of Waste:Date of Closure:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:
54198Unit 10, Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EDMr Alf KymeNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaMetal Recycling Sites (Vehicle Dismantlers)Issued23rd May 1995Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m
54115Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANSita Lancashire LtdNot SuppliedEnvironment Agency - North West Region, North AreaHousehold Waste Amenity SitesSurrendered14th May 199321st July 2003Not SuppliedNot SuppliedNot Supplied20th January 2011Not SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m
Burnley Borough Council - Has supplied landfill data
Lancashire County Council - Had landfill data but passed it to the relevant environment agency
Not SuppliedNot SuppliedBurnley Borough CouncilUnknown
Not SuppliedNot SuppliedPositioned by the supplierModerate
379169433511
379159433465
379299433599
379299433599
379122433391
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 15 of 29
Waste
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
35
36
Registered Landfill Sites
Registered Waste Transfer Sites
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
137
137
1
1
Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Licence Easting:Licence Northing:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Accuracy:Authorised Waste
Environment Agencymust give specific authorisation for this waste to be acceptedWasterequires prior approval
Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Licence Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:Authorised Waste
Prohibited Waste
British Gas North WesternL 253British Gas Holder Station, Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire379150433450Distribution Dept, Russell Street, BLACKBURN, Lancashire, BB2 3BNEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaLandfillUndefinedSome restriction on source of waste
Licence lapsed/cancelled/defunct/not applicable/surrenderedCancelled1st March 1987Not Given
Not Given
Manually positioned to the address or locationNot ApplicableCementCeramicsGlassNon-Hazardous MetalsSlate,Concrete,BrickSoil,Rock,Clay,Natural SandSolid Fully-Polymerised PlasticsTimberWaste N.O.S
Sita (Lancashire) LtdL 493Padiham H.W.D.C, Park Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, Bb12 7amTustin Court, Portway, Preston, Lancashire, Pr2 2yqEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaCivic AmenityUndefinedNo known restriction on source of waste
Operational as far as is knownOperational14th May 1993SR 48
Not Given
Manually positioned to the address or locationNot SuppliedCar BatteriesGen.Household/Com/Ind.WasteHousehold ChemicalsMineral OilsClinical Wastes
379150433450
379150433450
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 16 of 29
Waste
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
36
37
Registered Waste Transfer Sites
Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
137
99
1
1
Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Licence Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:Authorised Waste
Prohibited Waste
Licence Holder:Licence Reference:Site Location:Operator Location:Authority:Site Category:Max Input Rate:Waste Source Restrictions:Licence Status:Dated:Preceded By Licence:Superseded By Licence:Positional Accuracy:Boundary Quality:Authorised WasteProhibited Waste
Lancs Waste ServicesSR 48Park Road H.W.D.C, Padiham, Burnley, LancashirePO Box 9, Guildhouse, Cross Street, PRESTON, Lancashire, PR1 8RDEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaCivic AmenityUndefinedNo known restriction on source of waste
Record supersededSuperseded1st February 1991Not Given
L 493
Manually positioned to the address or locationNot SuppliedBonded AsbestosGarden WasteGeneral Household + Commercial WasteWaste Mineral Oil From HouseholdersWaste Solvent From HouseholdersAnimal WastesClinical Wastes
A Kyme - A & J Van Breakers LtdL 622A & T Commercials, Park Road, Padiham, BURNLEY, Lancashire, BB12 7ANAs Site AddressEnvironment Agency - North West Region, Central AreaScrapyardVery Small (Less than 10,000 tonnes per year)No known restriction on source of waste
Operational as far as is knownOperational23rd May 1995Not Given
Not Given
Manually positioned to the road within the address or locationNot SuppliedScrap VehiclesWaste N.O.S.
379150433450
379130433500
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 17 of 29
Geological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A13NE(S)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(S)
A13SW(SW)
A13NW(W)
A13SW(SW)
A13NW(W)
0
0
0
37
78
86
96
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
Description:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Lower Westphalian (mainly Productive Coal Measures)
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment<15 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment<15 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment<15 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
379299433599
379293433651
379299433599
379138433529
379074433629
379155433497
379083433673
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 18 of 29
Geological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Measured Urban Soil Chemistry
BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages
Coal Mining Affected Areas
Mining Instability
Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
A13NW(W)
A13NE(NE)
A14NW(E)
A13SW(SW)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(N)
A13NW(W)
149
163
236
249
0
0
0
0
78
5
5
5
5
6
-
3
3
3
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:ArsenicConcentration:CadmiumConcentration:ChromiumConcentration:Lead Concentration:NickelConcentration:
Description:
Mining Evidence:Source:Boundary Quality:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment<15 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment<15 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceSediment15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
In an area which may be affected by coal mining activity. It is recommended that a coal mining report is obtained from the Coal Authority. Contact details are included in the Useful Contacts section of this report.
Inconclusive Coal MiningOve Arup & PartnersAs Supplied
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No data available
No data available
No Hazard
379000433599
379481433798
379633433706
379000433397
379299433599
379299433599
379299433599
379293433652
379074433628
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 19 of 29
Geological
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures
Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas
A13NE(S)
A13NE(N)
A13NW(W)
A13NE(S)
A13NW(W)
A13SW(W)
A13NW(W)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(S)
A13NW(W)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(S)
A13NE(S)
0
0
78
0
16
72
82
0
0
78
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Protection Measure:
Source:
Affected Area:
Source:
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
ModerateBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
ModerateBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
ModerateBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensionsBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
The property is in a lower probability radon area, as less than 1% of homes are above the action levelBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No Hazard
379299433599
379293433652
379074433628
379299433599
379140433617
379078433586
379101433676
379293433652
379299433599
379074433628
379299433599
379299433599
379299433599
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 20 of 29
Industrial Land Use
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
38
38
38
38
38
38
39
39
39
40
40
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
A13SW(W)
A13SW(W)
A13SW(W)
A13SW(W)
A13SW(W)
A13SW(W)
A13NE(E)
A13NE(E)
A13NE(E)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(NE)
31
43
47
65
65
65
47
47
47
47
47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:
Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Lws Waste ServicesPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANWaste Disposal ServicesInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Bates Car & CommercialPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANGarage ServicesActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Robert WaltonPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANCommercial Vehicle DealersActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Pendal PalletsPark Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANPallets, Crates & Packing CasesInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address
SitaPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANRecycling CentresInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Burnley PalletsPark Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANPallets, Crates & Packing CasesActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Axle DirectGreenbridge Mill, Station Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFEngine Rebuilding & ReconditioningActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Padiham Property LtdGreenbridge Mill Offices, Station Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFIndustrial ServicesActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
BrencliffeGreen Bridge Mill,Green La, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ADCleaning Materials & EquipmentInactiveManually positioned to the address or location
Mistral2, Carrwood Green, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EGCarpet, Curtain & Upholstery CleanersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
ShipstonStation Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFFurniture Manufacturers - Home & OfficeActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
379138433568
379136433556
379136433552
379125433537
379134433534
379125433537
379462433624
379462433624
379462433624
379348433707
379368433709
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 21 of 29
Industrial Land Use
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
40
41
42
42
42
43
43
44
45
46
46
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
A13NE(N)
A13SE(SE)
A13SE(E)
A13SE(E)
A13SE(E)
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
A13SE(SE)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
82
64
98
98
98
125
155
135
198
208
209
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:
Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Peugeot & Citroen BreakersGreenbridge Mill ,Station Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EFCar Breakers & DismantlersActiveManually positioned within the geographical locality
Monty TyresThompson St, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7APTyre Repairs & RetreadingActiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Richard HaworthFactory, 9a, Green Lane, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7AGTextile ManufacturingActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Stockbridge Mill Co LtdGreen Lane, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7AEClothing & Fabrics - ManufacturersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Thornley & CoGreen Lane, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7AETextile ManufacturingInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Riverstone (Uk) LtdPark Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANRecycling CentresInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Monmouth Garage LtdPark Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7ANGarage ServicesActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
A Hollis (Padiham) LtdThompson Street Works, Thompson Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7APCar Body RepairsInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Harry Garlick107-111, Burnley Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8BLElectrical Goods Sales, Manufacturers & WholesalersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
The Worx Body ShopStation Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EBGarage ServicesInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Padiham PalletsStation Rd, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EBPallets, Crates & Packing CasesInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
379335433741
379474433522
379530433594
379530433594
379530433594
379128433474
379115433446
379496433451
379536433794
379377433870
379379433871
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 22 of 29
Industrial Land Use
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
47
47
47
48
49
50
51
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(NE)
A13NE(NE)
A13NW(N)
A14SW(E)
A13NE(N)
A13NW(NW)
211
234
241
213
242
247
249
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:
Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
F Holdcroft & Co81, Burnley Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8BLElectrical Goods Sales, Manufacturers & WholesalersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Foil & Label18, Sowerby Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8DBPrintersInactiveAutomatically positioned in the proximity of the address
Leedham (Elliott & Elliott) Ltd18, Sowerby Street, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8DBPrintersActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Anderson'S Catering & Bakery EquipmentPark View Works, Park View, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EECatering EquipmentInactiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Auto-TradeThe Kiosk, Stockbridge Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7HACar Dealers - UsedInactiveManually positioned to the road within the address or location
Paws & Tail2, Station Road, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 8EAPet Foods & Animal FeedsActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Detail Plastics LtdShuttleworth Mead Buisness Park,Meadway, Padiham, Burnley, Lancashire, BB12 7NGPlastic Products - ManufacturersInactiveManually positioned within the geographical locality
379478433853
379491433872
379510433870
379256433863
379657433483
379419433906
378958433762
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 23 of 29
Data Currency
Agency & Hydrological Version Update Cycle
Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices
Discharge Consents
Enforcement and Prohibition Notices
Integrated Pollution Controls
Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements
Nearest Surface Water Feature
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes
Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters
Registered Radioactive Substances
River Quality
River Quality Biology Sampling Points
River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points
Substantiated Pollution Incident Register
Water Abstractions
Water Industry Act Referrals
July 2012
March 2012
March 2012
November 2011
July 2012
September 2012
October 2008
July 2012
January 2012
June 2012
March 2012
November 2011
January 2012
June 2012
March 2012
November 2011
January 2012
June 2012
March 2012
November 2011
July 2012
January 2000
September 2012
September 2012
July 2012
November 2001
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Quarterly
Quarterly
Not Applicable
Quarterly
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Quarterly
Not Applicable
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Not Applicable
Annually
Annually
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Hyndburn Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Burnley Borough Council - Planning and Environment
Ribble Valley Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Pendle Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region
Hyndburn Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Pendle Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Burnley Borough Council - Planning and Environment
Ribble Valley Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Hyndburn Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Pendle Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Burnley Borough Council - Planning and Environment
Ribble Valley Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Hyndburn Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Pendle Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Burnley Borough Council - Planning and Environment
Ribble Valley Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Ordnance Survey
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 24 of 29
Data Currency
Agency & Hydrological Version Update Cycle
Groundwater Vulnerability
Drift Deposits
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Source Protection Zones
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences
Flood Water Storage Areas
Flood Defences
January 2011
January 1999
September 2011
September 2011
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Annually
Annually
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 25 of 29
Data Currency
Waste Version Update Cycle
BGS Recorded Landfill Sites
Historical Landfill Sites
Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
Local Authority Landfill Coverage
Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites
Registered Landfill Sites
Registered Waste Transfer Sites
Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites
June 1996
July 2012
July 2012
October 2008
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
May 2000
May 2000
May 2000
May 2000
May 2000
April 2003
May 2000
May 2000
May 2000
May 2000
March 2003
March 2003
March 2003
March 2003
March 2003
March 2003
Not Applicable
Quarterly
Quarterly
Not Applicable
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area
Environment Agency - North West Region
Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area
Burnley Borough Council
Hyndburn Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Lancashire County Council - Waste Management Group
Pendle Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Ribble Valley Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Pendle Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Burnley Borough Council
Hyndburn Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Lancashire County Council - Waste Management Group
Ribble Valley Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - Central Area
Environment Agency - North West Region - North Area
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 26 of 29
Data Currency
Hazardous Substances
Geological
Version
Version
Update Cycle
Update Cycle
Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)
Explosive Sites
Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)
Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements
Planning Hazardous Substance Consents
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Recorded Mineral Sites
Brine Compensation Area
Coal Mining Affected Areas
Mining Instability
Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas
Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures
May 2012
June 2012
November 2000
June 2012
March 2012
March 2012
October 2011
September 2011
June 2012
March 2012
March 2012
October 2011
September 2011
August 1996
January 2010
April 2012
August 2011
January 2012
October 2000
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
July 2011
July 2011
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Not Applicable
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling Update
Not Applicable
Variable
Bi-Annually
Not Applicable
As notified
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
As notified
As notified
Health and Safety Executive
Health and Safety Executive
Health and Safety Executive
Ribble Valley Borough Council
Hyndburn Borough Council - Planning
Pendle Borough Council - Planning
Lancashire County Council
Burnley Borough Council - Planning Services
Ribble Valley Borough Council
Hyndburn Borough Council - Planning
Pendle Borough Council - Planning
Lancashire County Council
Burnley Borough Council - Planning Services
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board
The Coal Authority - Mining Report Service
Ove Arup & Partners
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 27 of 29
Data Currency
Industrial Land Use
Sensitive Land Use
Version
Version
Update Cycle
Update Cycle
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Fuel Station Entries
Areas of Adopted Green Belt
Areas of Unadopted Green Belt
Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Forest Parks
Local Nature Reserves
Marine Nature Reserves
National Nature Reserves
National Parks
Nitrate Sensitive Areas
Nitrate Vulnerable Zones
Ramsar Sites
Sites of Special Scientific Interest
Special Areas of Conservation
Special Protection Areas
May 2012
May 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
July 2012
February 2012
April 1997
February 2012
August 2012
February 2012
August 2012
February 2012
February 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
August 2012
Quarterly
Quarterly
As notified
As notified
As notified
As notified
As notified
As notified
As notified
As notified
Bi-Annually
Annually
Not Applicable
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Not Applicable
Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Thomson Directories
Catalist Ltd - Experian
Burnley Borough Council
Hyndburn Borough Council
Pendle Borough Council
Ribble Valley Borough Council
Burnley Borough Council
Hyndburn Borough Council
Pendle Borough Council
Ribble Valley Borough Council
Natural England
Natural England
Forestry Commission
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 28 of 29
Data Suppliers
Ordnance Survey
Environment Agency
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
The Coal Authority
British Geological Survey
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Countryside Council for Wales
Scottish Natural Heritage
Natural England
Health Protection Agency
Ove Arup
Peter Brett Associates
Data Supplier Data Supplier Logo
A selection of organisations who provide data within this report
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 29 of 29
Useful Contacts
Contact Name and Address Contact Details
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
-
-
Environment Agency - National Customer Contact
Centre (NCCC)
Burnley Borough Council - Planning and Environment
British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service
Burnley Borough Council
Landmark Information Group Limited
The Coal Authority - Mining Report Service
Ribble Valley Borough Council
Hyndburn Borough Council
Pendle Borough Council
Natural England
Lancashire County Council - Waste Management
Group
Health Protection Agency - Radon Survey, Centre for
Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards
Landmark Information Group Limited
PO Box 544, Templeborough, Rotherham, S60 1BY
1st Floor, Parker Lane, Burnley, Lancashire, BB11 2DT
British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG
Town Hall, Manchester Road, Burnley, Lancashire, BB11 1JA
5 - 7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY
200 Lichfield Lane, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG18 4RG
Council Offices, Church Walk, Clitheroe, Lancashire, BB7 2RA
Development Services, Eagle Street, Accrington, Lancashire, BB5 1LN
Town Hall, Market Street, Nelson, Lancashire, BB9 7PG
Northminster House, Northminster Road, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE1 1UA
Environment Directorate, Guild House, Cross Street, Preston, Lancashire,PR1 8RD
Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ
The Smith Centre, Henley On Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 6AB
Telephone: 08708 506 506Email: enquiries@environment-agency.gov.uk
Telephone: 01282 425011Fax: 01282 779012Website: www.burnley.gov.uk
Telephone: 0115 936 3143Fax: 0115 936 3276Email: enquiries@bgs.ac.ukWebsite: www.bgs.ac.uk
Telephone: 01282 425011Fax: 01282 414799Website: www.burnley.gov.uk
Telephone: 01392 441761Fax: 01392 441709Email: cssupport@landmarkinfo.co.ukWebsite: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk
Telephone: 0845 7626848Email: thecoalauthority@coal.gov.uk
Telephone: 01200 425111Fax: 01200 414488Website: www.ribblevalley.gov.uk
Telephone: 01254 388111Fax: 01254 391625Website: www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk
Telephone: 01282 661661Fax: 01282 691552Website: www.pendle.gov.uk
Telephone: 0845 600 3078Fax: 01733 455103Email: enquiries@naturalengland.org.ukWebsite: www.naturalengland.org.uk
Website: www.lancashire.gov.uk
Telephone: 01235 822622Fax: 01235 833891Email: radon@hpa.org.ukWebsite: www.hpa.org.uk
Telephone: 0844 844 9952Fax: 0844 844 9951Email: customerservices@landmarkinfo.co.ukWebsite: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk
Please note that the Environment Agency / SEPA have a charging policy in place for enquiries.
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 1A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Site Sensitivity Map - Segment A13
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 3A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Site Sensitivity Map - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 3A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Flood Map - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 16-Oct-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Groundwater Vulnerability
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 16-Oct-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Bedrock Aquifer Designation
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 16-Oct-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Superficial Aquifer Designation
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 4 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 16-Oct-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Source Protection Zones
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 5 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 16-Oct-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Sensitive Land Uses
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
BGS Boreholes
Datasheet
Order Details:
Order Number:
Customer Reference:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Borehole Search Buffer (m):
Site Details:
Client Details:
Prepared For:
41967635_1_1
REL00396
379300, 433600
A
2.26
250
Station RoadPadiham
Ms L DanielsGeoDyne LtdThe GranaryChurch LaneThrumptonNG11 0AX
Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited
Report:®Envirocheck
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
BGS Boreholes Summary
Data TypePage
NumberOn Site 0 to 250m
BGS Boreholes None 9pg 1
Introduction
Copyright Notice
The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client.
In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.
© Landmark Information Group Limited 2012. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck® Report ("Report") is the property ofLandmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency and Natural England, and must not be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions accepted by the Customer. A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.
A copy of the BGS Borehole Ordering Form is available to download from the Support section of www.envirocheck.co.uk.
Report Version v47.0
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 1 of 2
BGS Boreholes Detail
Map
IDDetails
Quadrant
Reference
(Compass
Direction)
Estimated
Distance
From Site
Contact NGR
52
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
54
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
BGS Boreholes
A13NW(NW)
A13NW(NW)
A13NW(NW)
A13NW(NW)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
57
64
80
90
150
171
171
171
171
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
BGS Reference:Drilled Length (m):Borehole Name:
Sd73se18911.43Padiham Swimming Baths 2
Sd73se1889.14Padiham Swimming Baths 1
Sd73se1909.14Padiham Swimming Baths 3
Sd73se1919.14Padiham Swimming Baths 4
Sd73se3629.75Padiham A.T.E.No.2
Sd73se4/A9.33Padiham Atc 1
Sd73se4/B9.75Padiham Atc 2
Sd73se4/C9.33Padiham Atc 3
Sd73se4/D9.14Padiham Atc 4
379199433685
379232433704
379188433706
379219433727
379350433810
379330433830
379330433830
379330433830
379330433830
Order Number: 41967635_1_1 Date: 16-Oct-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 2 of 2
Data Currency and Contact Details
BGS Boreholes Version Update Cycle
BGS Boreholes
July 2012 QuarterlyBritish Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Contact Details Contact Logo
3
-
British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service
Landmark Information Group Limited
British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG
The Smith Centre, Henley On Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 6AB
Telephone: 0115 936 3143Fax: 0115 936 3276Email: enquiries@bgs.ac.ukWebsite: www.bgs.ac.uk
Telephone: 0844 844 9952Fax: 0844 844 9951Email: customerservices@landmarkinfo.co.ukWebsite: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 3A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Borehole Map - Slice A
For Borehole information please refer to the Borehole datasheet which accompanied this slice.
A copy of the BGS Borehole Ordering Form is available to download from the Support section of www.envirocheck.co.uk.
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Details:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Estimated Soil Chemistry Arsenic - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Details:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Estimated Soil Chemistry Cadmium - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Details:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Estimated Soil Chemistry Chromium - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Details:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 4 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Estimated Soil Chemistry Lead - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsStation Road, Padiham
Order Details:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41967635_1_1REL00396379300, 433600A2.26250
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 5 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 16-Oct-2012
Estimated Soil Chemistry Nickel - Slice A
APPENDIX IX
Coal Authority Mining Report
APPENDIX X
Ground Gas and Water Monitoring Results
Project No.
Client
Site Location
Date
Weather
Atmospheric Pressure (mb)
Equipment
Operator
Borehole No. Peak Methane Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Gas Flow Depth to Time to steady Other Issues i.e. odour, condition of installation, etc
Steady (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (l/h) Groundwater (mbgl) reading (secs)
Peak 0.0 0.2 20.7 0.0
Steady 0.0 0.2 20.7 0.0
Peak 0.0 5.4 12.8 0.0
Steady 0.0 5.4 12.8 0.0
Peak 0.0 2.0 16.1 0.0
Steady 0.0 2.0 16.1 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.3 19.8 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.3 19.8 0.0
Peak 0.0 2.4 19.3 0.0
Steady 0.0 2.4 19.3 0.0
Ambient 0.0 0.0 21.1 NA NA NA
Notes
Cell is highlighted in the following conditions
1. Where Methane exceeds 1% v/v (after BR212)
2. Where Carbon Dioxide exceeds 5% v/v (after BR212)
NA - Not Applicable/ Not Available
BOH - Bottom of Hole
ND - Not Determined
NGW - No groundwater encountered
Monitored for 120 seconds
Monitored for 120 secondsWS8 0.53 90
Monitored for 120 seconds
WS7 2.08 30 Monitored for 180 seconds
971
GA2000+ (GEO 09=Derby) & Dipmeter
JPH
0.99
MONITORING OF SOIL GASES AND GROUNDWATER - IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIRIA C665
Monitored for 120 secondsWS2
WS5 2.34 40
20
WS4 1.70 60
REL00396
Padiham
31/10/2012
Sunny
Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited
Visit 1 - 31.10.2012
Project No.
Client
Site Location
Date
Weather
Atmospheric Pressure (mb)
Equipment
Operator
Borehole No. Peak Methane Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Gas Flow Depth to Time to steady Other Issues i.e. odour, condition of installation, etc
Steady (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (l/h) Groundwater (mbgl) reading (secs)
Peak 0.0 0.1 20.8 0.0
Steady 0.0 0.1 20.8 0.0
Peak 0.0 5.8 13.9 0.0
Steady 0.0 5.8 13.9 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.6 18.0 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.6 18.0 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.0 20.1 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.0 20.1 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.5 19.9 0.0
Steady 0.0 0.7 20.4 0.0
Ambient 0.0 0.0 20.8 NA NA NA
Notes
Cell is highlighted in the following conditions
1. Where Methane exceeds 1% v/v (after BR212)
2. Where Carbon Dioxide exceeds 5% v/v (after BR212)
NA - Not Applicable/ Not Available
BOH - Bottom of Hole
ND - Not Determined
NGW - No groundwater encountered
REL00396
Padiham
05/11/2012
Sunny
Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited
20
996
GA2000+ (GEO 09=Derby) & Dipmeter
RN
0.92
MONITORING OF SOIL GASES AND GROUNDWATER - IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIRIA C665
Monitored for 120 secondsWS2
WS4 1.55 60 Monitored for 120 seconds
Monitored for 120 seconds
WS7 1.95 30 Monitored for 180 seconds
WS5 1.68 40
Monitored for 120 secondsWS8 0.65 90
Visit 2 - 5.11.2012
Project No.
Client
Site Location
Date
Weather
Atmospheric Pressure (mb)
Equipment
Operator
Borehole No. Peak Methane Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Gas Flow Depth to Time to steady Other Issues i.e. odour, condition of installation, etc
Steady (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (l/h) Groundwater (mbgl) reading (secs)
Peak 0.0 0.1 20.4 0.0
Steady 0.0 0.1 20.4 0.0
Peak 0.0 5.2 14.2 0.0
Steady 0.0 5.2 14.2 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.7 18.0 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.7 18.0 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.0 19.8 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.0 19.8 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.6 19.2 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.4 19.5 0.0
Ambient 0.0 0.0 20.7 NA NA NA
Notes
Cell is highlighted in the following conditions
1. Where Methane exceeds 1% v/v (after BR212)
2. Where Carbon Dioxide exceeds 5% v/v (after BR212)
NA - Not Applicable/ Not Available
BOH - Bottom of Hole
ND - Not Determined
NGW - No groundwater encountered
Monitored for 120 seconds
Monitored for 120 secondsWS8 0.67 60
Monitored for 120 seconds
WS7 2.07 30 Monitored for 180 seconds
1000
GA2000+ (GEO 09=Derby) & Dipmeter
RN
1.11
MONITORING OF SOIL GASES AND GROUNDWATER - IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIRIA C665
Monitored for 120 secondsWS2
WS5 1.69 40
20
WS4 1.74 100
REL00396
Padiham
12/11/2012
Overcast and Rain
Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited
Visit 3 - 12.11.2012
Project No.
Client
Site Location
Date
Weather
Atmospheric Pressure (mb)
Equipment
Operator
Borehole No. Peak Methane Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Gas Flow Depth to Time to steady Other Issues i.e. odour, condition of installation, etc
Steady (% v/v) (% v/v) (% v/v) (l/h) Groundwater (mbgl) reading (secs)
Peak 0.0 0.1 20.1 0.0
Steady 0.0 0.1 20.2 0.0
Peak 0.0 5.1 14.7 0.0
Steady 0.0 5.1 14.7 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.9 17.5 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.9 17.5 0.0
Peak 0.0 0.9 20.2 0.0
Steady 0.0 0.9 20.2 0.0
Peak 0.0 1.3 19.4 0.0
Steady 0.0 1.3 19.4 0.0
Ambient 0.0 0.0 20.6 NA NA NA
Notes
Cell is highlighted in the following conditions
1. Where Methane exceeds 1% v/v (after BR212)
2. Where Carbon Dioxide exceeds 5% v/v (after BR212)
NA - Not Applicable/ Not Available
BOH - Bottom of Hole
ND - Not Determined
NGW - No groundwater encountered
WS5
995
GA2000+ (GEO 09=Derby) & Dipmeter
RN
MONITORING OF SOIL GASES AND GROUNDWATER - IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIRIA C665
REL00396
Padiham
21/11/2012
Cloudy
Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited
35
WS4 1.56 65
0.87
Monitored for 120 secondsWS8 0.51 30
40 Monitored for 180 seconds
Monitored for 120 secondsWS2
Monitored for 120 seconds
Monitored for 120 seconds
WS7 1.86
1.55 45
Visit 4 - 21.11.2012
APPENDIX XI
Statistical Assessment
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Arsenic Deg of Freedom t
SAC 32 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 5 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 16 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 25 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 48 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 27 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 22 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 40 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 26.14 Minimum 5Standard Deviation s 14.4 Maximum 48number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 36.7
Mean Test 1.15
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Arsenic Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)
SAC 32 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 3 1.153
TP3 0.50 5 4 1.462
TP7 0.50 16 5 1.671
TP12 0.40 25 6 1.822
WS4 0.70 48 7 1.938
WS5 0.80 27 8 2.032
WS7 0.70 22 9 2.11
WS8 0.20 40 10 2.176
11 2.234
12 2.285
13 2.331
14 2.372
15 2.409
16 2.443
17 2.475
18 2.504
19 2.531
20 2.557
21 2.58
22 2.603
23 2.624
24 2.644
25 2.663
26 2.681
27 2.698
28 2.714
29 2.73
30 2.745
Arithmetic Mean x 26.14
Standard Deviation s 14.4
Minimum 5
Maximum Value Xn 48
Number N 7
Critical Value Tcrit 1.938
Calculate Tn 1.521
Comment/Decision There are no outliers in the dataset
CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Cadmium Deg of Freedom t
SAC 10 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 0.6 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 1.6 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1.9 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 4.1 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 2.7 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 2.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 3.4 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 2.34 Minimum 0.6Standard Deviation s 1.2 Maximum 4.1number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 3.2
Mean Test 0.32
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Made Ground
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Chromium Deg of Freedom t
SAC 3000 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 11 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 21 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 18 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 20 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 20 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 25 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 20 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 19.29 Minimum 11Standard Deviation s 4.2 Maximum 25number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 22.4
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Lead n t
SAC 450 mg/kg
2 6.314
TP3 0.50 25 3 2.92
TP7 0.50 35 4 2.353
TP12 0.40 87 5 2.132
WS4 0.70 240 6 2.015
WS5 0.80 152 7 1.943
WS7 0.70 154 8 1.895
WS8 0.20 187 9 1.86
10 1.833
11 1.812
12 1.796
13 1.782
14 1.771
15 1.761
16 1.753
17 1.746
18 1.74
19 1.734
20 1.729
21 1.725
22 1.721
23 1.717
24 1.714
25 1.711
26 1.708
27 1.706
28 1.703
29 1.701
30 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 125.7 Minimum 25Standard Deviation s 79.8 Maximum 240number (N) 7
n2.6
Representative t value Not Applicable
Geometric Mean (See SGV10 pg14) 96.9
Mean Test 0.22
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test - Geometric Mean Model (Lead)
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Nickel Deg of Freedom t
SAC 130 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 9 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 22 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 31 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 32 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 30 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 38 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 48 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 30.00 Minimum 9Standard Deviation s 12.2 Maximum 48number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 39.0
Mean Test 0.30
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Mercury (inorganic) Deg of Freedom t
SAC 170 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 0.28 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.19 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.17 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 0.17 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.24 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.47 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 1.10 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.37 Minimum 0.17Standard Deviation s 0.3 Maximum 1.1number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.6
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Copper Deg of Freedom t
SAC 2330 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 14 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 20 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 127 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 83 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 62 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 56 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 219 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 83.00 Minimum 14Standard Deviation s 71.1 Maximum 219number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 135.2
Mean Test 0.06
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Selenium Deg of Freedom t
SAC 350 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 1 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 1 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 2 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 2 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 2 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 1.43 Minimum 1Standard Deviation s 0.5 Maximum 2number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 1.8
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Zinc Deg of Freedom t
SAC 3750 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 47 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 98 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 122 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 102 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 104 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 106 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 131 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 101.43 Minimum 47Standard Deviation s 26.8 Maximum 131number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 121.1
Mean Test 0.03
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Acenaphthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 210 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 1.2 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.2 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 2.7 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.4 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 0.2 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.70 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 1.0 Maximum 2.7number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 1.4
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Made Ground
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Fluorene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 160 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 0.9 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.1 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 1.5 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.2 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 0.2 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.44 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.5 Maximum 1.5number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.8
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Made Ground
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Phenanthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 92 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 9.2 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.5 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1.7 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 17.8 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 1.5 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.2 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 3.1 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 4.86 Minimum 0.2Standard Deviation s 6.5 Maximum 17.8number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 9.6
Mean Test 0.10
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Anthracene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 2300 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 1.3 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.3 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 2.8 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.3 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 0.6 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.79 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 1.0 Maximum 2.8number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 1.5
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 260 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 13.4 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.7 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 2.5 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 42.6 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 2.6 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 3.6 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 9.36 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 15.3 Maximum 42.6number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 20.6
Mean Test 0.08
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Pyrene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 560 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 11.0 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.6 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 2.2 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 38.7 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 2.5 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.2 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 3.0 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 8.31 Minimum 0.2Standard Deviation s 13.9 Maximum 38.7number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 18.5
Mean Test 0.03
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(a)anthracene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 3.1 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 6.7 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.3 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1.4 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 23.7 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 1.2 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 1.9 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 5.04 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 8.5 Maximum 23.7number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 11.30
Mean Test 3.65
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(a)anthracene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)
SAC 3.1 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 3 1.153
TP3 0.50 6.7 4 1.462
TP7 0.50 0.3 5 1.671
TP12 0.40 1.4 6 1.822
WS4 0.70 23.7 7 1.938
WS5 0.80 1.2 8 2.032
WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11
WS8 0.20 1.9 10 2.176
11 2.234
12 2.285
13 2.331
14 2.372
15 2.409
16 2.443
17 2.475
18 2.504
19 2.531
20 2.557
21 2.58
22 2.603
23 2.624
24 2.644
25 2.663
26 2.681
27 2.698
28 2.714
29 2.73
30 2.745
Arithmetic Mean x 5.04
Standard Deviation s 8.5
Minimum 0.1
Maximum Value Xn 23.7
Number N 7
Critical Value Tcrit 1.938
Calculate Tn 2.189
Comment/Decision
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
06/12/2012
Made Ground
The maximum value in the dataset is an outlier
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Chrysene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 6.0 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 7.4 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.4 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1.6 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 24.8 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 1.3 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 2.0 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 5.37 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 8.9 Maximum 24.8number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 11.9
Mean Test 1.99
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Chrysene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)
SAC 6 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 3 1.153
TP3 0.50 7.4 4 1.462
TP7 0.50 0.4 5 1.671
TP12 0.40 1.6 6 1.822
WS4 0.70 24.8 7 1.938
WS5 0.80 1.3 8 2.032
WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11
WS8 0.20 2.0 10 2.176
11 2.234
12 2.285
13 2.331
14 2.372
15 2.409
16 2.443
17 2.475
18 2.504
19 2.531
20 2.557
21 2.58
22 2.603
23 2.624
24 2.644
25 2.663
26 2.681
27 2.698
28 2.714
29 2.73
30 2.745
Arithmetic Mean x 5.37
Standard Deviation s 8.9
Minimum 0.1
Maximum Value Xn 24.8
Number N 7
Critical Value Tcrit 1.938
Calculate Tn 2.181
Comment/Decision
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
06/12/2012
Made Ground
The maximum value in the dataset is an outlier
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 5.6 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 8.8 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.5 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1.8 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 34.3 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 1.5 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.2 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 2.1 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 7.03 Minimum 0.2Standard Deviation s 12.4 Maximum 34.3number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 16.1
Mean Test 2.88
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)
SAC 5.6 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 3 1.153
TP3 0.50 8.8 4 1.462
TP7 0.50 0.5 5 1.671
TP12 0.40 1.8 6 1.822
WS4 0.70 34.3 7 1.938
WS5 0.80 1.5 8 2.032
WS7 0.70 0.2 9 2.11
WS8 0.20 2.1 10 2.176
11 2.234
12 2.285
13 2.331
14 2.372
15 2.409
16 2.443
17 2.475
18 2.504
19 2.531
20 2.557
21 2.58
22 2.603
23 2.624
24 2.644
25 2.663
26 2.681
27 2.698
28 2.714
29 2.73
30 2.745
Arithmetic Mean x 7.03
Standard Deviation s 12.4
Minimum 0.2
Maximum Value Xn 34.3
Number N 7
Critical Value Tcrit 1.938
Calculate Tn 2.204
Comment/Decision
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
06/12/2012
Made Ground
The maximum value in the dataset is an outlier
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(a)pyrene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 0.83 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 5.4 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.3 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1.1 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 22.5 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 1.0 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 1.5 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 4.56 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 8.1 Maximum 22.5number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 10.51
Mean Test 12.67
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
06/12/2012
Made Ground
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(a)pyrene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)
SAC 0.83 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 3 1.153
TP3 0.50 5.4 4 1.462
TP7 0.50 0.3 5 1.671
TP12 0.40 1.1 6 1.822
WS4 0.70 22.5 7 1.938
WS5 0.80 1.0 8 2.032
WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11
WS8 0.20 1.5 10 2.176
11 2.234
12 2.285
13 2.331
14 2.372
15 2.409
16 2.443
17 2.475
18 2.504
19 2.531
20 2.557
21 2.58
22 2.603
23 2.624
24 2.644
25 2.663
26 2.681
27 2.698
28 2.714
29 2.73
30 2.745
Arithmetic Mean x 4.56
Standard Deviation s 8.1
Minimum 0.1
Maximum Value Xn 22.5
Number N 7
Critical Value Tcrit 1.938
Calculate Tn 2.213
Comment/Decision
REL00396
06/12/2012
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
Made Ground
The maximum value in the dataset is an outlier
CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Indeno(123-cd)pyrene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 3.2 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 2.9 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.2 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.8 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 12.2 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.5 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 0.8 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 2.50 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 4.4 Maximum 12.2number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 5.7
Mean Test 1.79
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Indeno(123-cd)pyrene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)
SAC 3.2 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 3 1.153
TP3 0.50 2.9 4 1.462
TP7 0.50 0.2 5 1.671
TP12 0.40 0.8 6 1.822
WS4 0.70 12.2 7 1.938
WS5 0.80 0.5 8 2.032
WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11
WS8 0.20 0.8 10 2.176
11 2.234
12 2.285
13 2.331
14 2.372
15 2.409
16 2.443
17 2.475
18 2.504
19 2.531
20 2.557
21 2.58
22 2.603
23 2.624
24 2.644
25 2.663
26 2.681
27 2.698
28 2.714
29 2.73
30 2.745
Arithmetic Mean x 2.50
Standard Deviation s 4.4
Minimum 0.1
Maximum Value Xn 12.2
Number N 7
Critical Value Tcrit 1.938
Calculate Tn 2.215
Comment/Decision
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
06/12/2012
Made Ground
The maximum value in the dataset is an outlier
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 0.76 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 1.1 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.3 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 4.0 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.2 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 0.3 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.87 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 1.4 Maximum 4.0number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 1.9
Mean Test 2.52
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Dibenzo(ah)anthracene Sample Size Tcrit (@ 0.05)
SAC 0.76 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 3 1.153
TP3 0.50 1.1 4 1.462
TP7 0.50 0.1 5 1.671
TP12 0.40 0.3 6 1.822
WS4 0.70 4.0 7 1.938
WS5 0.80 0.2 8 2.032
WS7 0.70 0.1 9 2.11
WS8 0.20 0.3 10 2.176
11 2.234
12 2.285
13 2.331
14 2.372
15 2.409
16 2.443
17 2.475
18 2.504
19 2.531
20 2.557
21 2.58
22 2.603
23 2.624
24 2.644
25 2.663
26 2.681
27 2.698
28 2.714
29 2.73
30 2.745
Arithmetic Mean x 0.87
Standard Deviation s 1.4
Minimum 0.1
Maximum Value Xn 4
Number N 7
Critical Value Tcrit 1.938
Calculate Tn 2.200
Comment/Decision
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
CLEA Outlier Test (Grubbs Test) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
06/12/2012
Made Ground
The maximum value in the dataset is an outlier
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(ghi)perylene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 44 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 4.2 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.3 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 1.1 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 17.3 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.9 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 1.3 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 3.60 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 6.2 Maximum 17.3number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 8.1
Mean Test 0.19
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Made Ground
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Acenaphthylene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 170 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 0.1 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.1 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 0.9 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.1 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 0.1 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.21 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.3 Maximum 0.9number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.4
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Made Ground
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Naphthalene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 1.5 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP3 0.50 1.0 2 2.92
TP7 0.50 0.1 3 2.353
TP12 0.40 0.2 4 2.132
WS4 0.70 3.0 5 2.015
WS5 0.80 0.4 6 1.943
WS7 0.70 0.1 7 1.895
WS8 0.20 0.6 8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.77 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 1.0 Maximum 3.0number (N) 7
n 3
Representative t value 1.943
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 1.5
Mean Test 1.02
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Undertake Outlier Test
Accept null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is equal to or
greater than the Critical Concentraction - UCL Above SAC - FAIL
06/12/2012
Made Ground
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Arsenic Deg of Freedom t
SAC 32 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 7 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 5 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 3 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 5 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 4 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 4.80 Minimum 3Standard Deviation s 1.5 Maximum 7number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 6.2
Mean Test 0.19
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Cadmium Deg of Freedom t
SAC 10 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 2.0 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 1.6 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 1.4 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 1.5 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 1.7 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 1.64 Minimum 1.4Standard Deviation s 0.2 Maximum 2number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 1.9
Mean Test 0.19
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Chromium Deg of Freedom t
SAC 3000 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 25 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 30 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 25 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 26 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 28 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 26.80 Minimum 25Standard Deviation s 2.2 Maximum 30number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 28.9
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Lead n t
SAC 450 mg/kg
2 6.314
TP9 0.70 24 3 2.92
TP11 1.00 33 4 2.353
TP14 1.60 16 5 2.132
WS1 2.10 16 6 2.015
WS7 1.10 16 7 1.943
8 1.895
9 1.86
10 1.833
11 1.812
12 1.796
13 1.782
14 1.771
15 1.761
16 1.753
17 1.746
18 1.74
19 1.734
20 1.729
21 1.725
22 1.721
23 1.717
24 1.714
25 1.711
26 1.708
27 1.706
28 1.703
29 1.701
30 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 21.0 Minimum 16Standard Deviation s 7.5 Maximum 33number (N) 5
n2.2
Representative t value Not Applicable
Geometric Mean (See SGV10 pg14) 20.1
Mean Test 0.04
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test - Geometric Mean Model (Lead)
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Nickel Deg of Freedom t
SAC 130 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 33 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 18 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 26 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 27 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 27 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 26.20 Minimum 18Standard Deviation s 5.4 Maximum 33number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 31.3
Mean Test 0.24
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Mercury (inorganic) Deg of Freedom t
SAC 170 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.17 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.17 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.17 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.17 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.20 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.18 Minimum 0.17Standard Deviation s 0.0 Maximum 0.2number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.2
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Copper Deg of Freedom t
SAC 2330 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 29 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 15 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 19 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 18 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 21 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 20.40 Minimum 15Standard Deviation s 5.3 Maximum 29number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 25.4
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Selenium Deg of Freedom t
SAC 350 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 2 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 2 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 2 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 1 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 1.60 Minimum 1Standard Deviation s 0.5 Maximum 2number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 2.1
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Zinc Deg of Freedom t
SAC 3750 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 83 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 61 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 63 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 83 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 96 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 77.20 Minimum 61Standard Deviation s 14.9 Maximum 96number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 91.4
Mean Test 0.02
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Acenaphthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 210 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.5 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.20 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.2 Maximum 0.5number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.4
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Fluorene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 160 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.4 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.16 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.1 Maximum 0.4number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.3
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Phenanthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 92 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.5 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 2.5 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.66 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 1.0 Maximum 2.5number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 1.7
Mean Test 0.02
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Anthracene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 2300 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.6 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.3 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.24 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.2 Maximum 0.6number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.4
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 260 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.3 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 1.4 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.40 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.6 Maximum 1.4number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.9
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Pyrene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 560 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 1.4 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.38 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.6 Maximum 1.4number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.9
Mean Test 0.00
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Chrysene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 6.0 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.8 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.26 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.3 Maximum 0.8number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.6
Mean Test 0.09
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(b/k)fluoranthene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 5.6 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.3 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.2 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.2 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.2 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.7 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.32 Minimum 0.2Standard Deviation s 0.2 Maximum 0.7number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.5
Mean Test 0.09
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(a)pyrene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 0.83 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.5 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.18 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.2 Maximum 0.5number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.35
Mean Test 0.42
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Indeno(123-cd)pyrene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 3.2 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.2 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.12 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.0 Maximum 0.2number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.2
Mean Test 0.05
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Benzo(ghi)perylene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 44 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.1 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.4 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.16 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.1 Maximum 0.4number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.3
Mean Test 0.01
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
Client
Site
Our Ref
Date
Soil Type
Determinant Naphthalene Deg of Freedom t
SAC 1.5 mg/kg
Location Depth Conc (mg/kg) 1 6.314
TP9 0.70 0.2 2 2.92
TP11 1.00 0.1 3 2.353
TP14 1.60 0.1 4 2.132
WS1 2.10 0.1 5 2.015
WS7 1.10 0.6 6 1.943
7 1.895
8 1.86
9 1.833
10 1.812
11 1.796
12 1.782
13 1.771
14 1.761
15 1.753
16 1.746
17 1.74
18 1.734
19 1.729
20 1.725
21 1.721
22 1.717
23 1.714
24 1.711
25 1.708
26 1.706
27 1.703
28 1.701
29 1.699
Arithmetic Mean x 0.22 Minimum 0.1Standard Deviation s 0.2 Maximum 0.6number (N) 5
n 2
Representative t value 2.132
Upper 95th
%ile on the mean 0.4
Mean Test 0.28
Comment/Decision
Comment with respect to Maximum Value Test Do Not Undertake Outlier Test
Reject null hypothesis - The true mean concentration of the contaminant is less than the
Critical Concentration - UCL Below SAC - PASS
06/12/2012
Natural Strata
CLEA Mean Value Test (One Sample t-test ) NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Renaissanace Land Regeneration Ltd
Station Road, Padiham
REL00396
APPENDIX XII
Plates
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP1
Plate No. 1
Rev.Station Road, Padiham
TRIAL PIT TP1
TRIAL PIT TP1 ARISINGS TRIAL PIT TP1 ARISINGS
TRIAL PIT TP1
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP2
Plate No. 2
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP2
TRIAL PIT TP2 ARISINGS
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP3
Plate No. 3
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP3
TRIAL PIT TP3 ARISINGS
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP4
Plate No. 4
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP4
TRIAL PIT TP4 ARISINGS
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP5
Plate No. 5
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP5
TRIAL PIT TP5 ARISINGS
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP6
Plate No. 6
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP6
TRIAL PIT TP6 SIDEWALLS COLLAPSING
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP7
Plate No. 7
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP7 - WATER ENCOUNTERED AT 2.60M
TRIAL PIT TP7 ARISINGS WITH CERAMIC, COAL , WOOD AND BLACK SILT
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP8
Plate No. 8
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP8
TRIAL PIT TP8 ARISINGS
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Arisings of Trial Pit TP9 & TP10
Plate No. 9
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP9 ARISINGS
TRIAL PIT TP10 ARISINGS
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP11 & TP12
Plate No. 10
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP11
TRIAL PIT TP12
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title General Views of Trial Pit TP13 & TP14
Plate No. 11
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
TRIAL PIT TP13
TRIAL PIT TP14
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Views of Arisings from WS1 & WS2
Plate No. 12
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
BOREHOLE WS1
BOREHOLE WS2
1.00m
2.00m
3.00m
1.00m
2.00m
3.00m
4.00m
Loose very silty SAND
Poor recovery between 1.00m to 2.00m
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Views of Arisings from WS3 & WS4
Plate No. 13
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
BOREHOLE WS3
1.00m
Sandy gravel
Sandstone cobbles
BOREHOLE WS4
1.00m
2.00m
Sandy clayey topsoil Ashy sand
Gravelly sandy CLAY
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Views of Arisings from WS5 & WS7
Plate No. 14
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
BOREHOLE WS7
BOREHOLE WS5
1.00m
3.00m
2.00m
5.00m
6.00m
4.00m
1.00m
4.00m
3.00m
2.00m
6.00m
5.00m
7.00m
Clayey silty sandy PEAT
Gravelly very sandy silty CLAYSandy gravelly
clayey SILT
Gravelly sandy very silty CLAY
Sandy gravelly clay
Sandy gravel with macadam
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Views of Arisings from WS8
Plate No. 15
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
1.00m
4.00m
3.00m
2.00m
5.00m
Sandstone gravel
Gravelly sandy silty CLAY
Black sandy gravel
BOREHOLE WS8
Silty sandy gravelly clay
30% recovery between 1.00m to 2.00m
View from west of site looking south (off site) at retaining wall
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Site Views
Plate No. 16
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
View from along the line of the former railway (off site) looking
View of leisure centre looking northeast from footpath to the north of the site
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Site Views
Plate No. 17
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
View from of the embankment present to the north of the site looking east
View of the embankment present on the south of the site
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Site Views
Plate No. 18
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
View of the retaining wall from the former railway line to the east of the site
View from the northeast corner of the site looking southwest
Project No. REL00396 Drawn GJS Client Renaissance Land Regeneration Limited Checked
Approved Project Scale NTS
Date Drawn 06/12/2012 Title Site Views
Plate No. 19
Station Road, Padiham Rev.
View of the west of the site looking east
APPENDIX XII
Conditions and Limitations
Conditions & Limitations
Phase I Desk Studies
1. Works undertaken to provide the basis of the Phase I Desk Study report comprise a review of information available from a number
of sources/parties (potentially also including the Client) together with a walk over of the site (where applicable and included within
the quotation). The opinions given in the Phase I Desk Study are based on the information available from third parties/sources that
has been obtained within the available timeframe. Jackson Purdue Lever assumes all third party information to be true and correct
and therefore cannot accept liability for the accuracy of such information supplied.
2. Should additional information become available that may affect the comments and opinions made within the Phase I Desk Study,
Jackson Purdue Lever reserves the right to review such information and make modifications to comments/opinions as appropriate.
3. It should be borne in mind that a Phase I Desk Study collates available information to generate a conceptual model of the site. The
actual geotechnical and environmental considerations can only be fully quantified by intrusive investigation works to confirm the
accuracy of the conceptual site model.
Phase II Intrusive Investigations
1. Our quotation assumes that access to the site will be arranged by others at no cost to ourselves.
2. We have assumed that free access is available throughout to the entire site and that works can be undertaken during a single
mobilisation. Where restricted access is encountered, or where additional unscheduled mobilisations are required, additional costs
may be incurred to the client.
3. We have assumed that all available information relating to buried services will be supplied by the Client at no cost to ourselves. No
responsibility will be accepted for damage to underground services that have not been brought to our prior attention by the Client.
4. All excavations/boreholes will be backfilled with compacted arisings upon completion, with any excess arisings left proud of ground
levels. Excess arisings will not be removed from the site unless specifically requested by the Client. Where we are requested to
remove excess arisings, all associated costs will be passed to the Client.
5. We will attempt to leave the site in a clean and tidy state, however, it must be understood that some disturbance of the site is
unavoidable during intrusive works.
6. Exploratory holes are positioned approximately on site by Jackson Purdue Lever. Should the client require precise locations of all
exploratory points, additional fees will be incurred. It must be borne in mind that backfilled trial pits can create ‘soft spots’,
therefore, should the Client wish to designate ‘no dig’ zones, for example under the footprint of proposed structures, these must be
brought to our attention prior to commencement of works.
7. Groundwater observations relate to conditions encountered at the time of investigation. It must be understood that groundwater
levels may vary as a result of recent climatic conditions or seasonal variation.
8. Trial pits and boreholes examine only a small proportion of the total site area. No liability can be accepted for conditions not
revealed in exploratory holes, particularly between positions. All extrapolations of available data are given in good faith.
Payment
1. Payment terms are strictly 28 days from the invoice date.
2. Prior to commencement of works, we require receipt of formal written instruction from the party accepting full financial
responsibility for the work. In the absence of such an instruction, we would expect the instructing Consulting Engineers/Architects
to accept full financial responsibility for the works.
3. Receipt of instruction to commence work shall be taken as acceptance and compliance of the foregoing conditions.
Liability
1. No individual liability shall be implied to, or accepted by, any employee for works undertaken for and on the behalf of Jackson
Purdue Lever.
top related