com a slideshow of epic proportions

COMA Slideshow of Epic Proportions

Sean Baxterhttp://www.eburg.com/~baxters/

What is COM?

• A standard for interoperable software

• A runtime library providing low-level or hard-to-implement functionality

• A competitive, capitalist marketplace for selling functionality to application developers

• An endless source of healthy obfuscation

That Last Slide Was Pulled From Booboo’s Rear End. What is COM, Really?

• A sacred covenant held by the world’s best developers. All software functionality is encapsulated through a COM class (coclass) and exposed through COM interfaces

Blah Blah BlahBlah Blah BlahBlah Blah Blah

Booboo

Mooooo

Interface and Coclass Fundamentals• An interface is a group of methods

• A coclass is a group of interfaces

• All coclasses implement the IUnknown interface

• All other interfaces derive IUnknown

• Lollipop diagrams describe coclassesIUnknown

O inkIFoo

IBar

About Interfaces• The client communicates with the server through

interface pointers (think base class pointers)• Methods implemented by the coclass are invoked

through interface pointers• Interface pointers are acquired through IUnknown• Because all interfaces derive IUnknown, any

interface pointer on an object can be acquired through any other interface pointer on the object

• The method to acquire an interface pointer is IUnknown::QueryInterface (think dynamic_cast)

More About Interfaces• Interfaces are equivalent to C++ abstract

base classes

• Because there is no standard thunk mechanism, interfaces do not support multiple inheritance

• Two IUnknown pointers point to the same object if their values are equal

• “Dispatch interfaces” are special case interfaces allowed by the COM Specification

Interfaces and Virtual Tables

• An interface pointer points to the corresponding slice of a COM object

• The first 4 bytes of this slice comprise a pointer to the interface’s virtual table

• Each slot in this virtual table is the address of an interface method

• A method implementation may be referenced by more than one vtbl entry

pAddRef

pRelease

pFooFunc1

pFooFunc2

pFooFunc3

pQueryInterface

pAddRef

pRelease

pBarFunc1

pBarFunc2

pBarFunc3

pQueryInterface

pAddRef

pRelease

pQueryInterfaceIUnknown

O ink

IFoo

IBar

m _pU nkV tb l

m _pFooV tb l

m _pB arV tb l

Q ueryInterface()

AddRef()

Release()

FooFunc1()

FooFunc2()

FooFunc3()

BarFunc1()

BarFunc2()

BarFunc3()

Interface Method Indirection

Reference Counting

• To regulate destruction of objects, COM requires that all coclasses implement a reference counter

• COM objects can have their methods invoked from other threads, processes, and even machines. Reference Counting eliminates a number of problems associated with synchronization

Reference Counting Rules

• Each object is given a reference count of 1 upon instantiation

• IUnknown::AddRef increments the reference count

• A successful IUnknown::QueryInterface call increments the reference count

• IUnknown::Release decrements the reference count

• When the reference count is decremented to zero, the object destroys itself

So Why All These Interface and Reference Counting Formalities?

• One of the most amazing features of COM objects is location transparency: COM marshals interfaces between processes and remote computers

• Reference counting guarantees that a client cannot prematurely destroy a shared object

• COM is language transparent: unsophisticated languages like Visual Basic, VBA, J-Script, and VB-Script would not otherwise be able to properly delete objects

Speaking of Location Transparency...

• COM objects (servers) can be delivered in two module types: EXEs or DLLs (aka OCXs)

• EXEs cannot run in-process

• DLLs can only run in-process

• A “surrogate” EXE can load a DLL to make it an out-of-process server

An In-process Server (same apartment)

IU nknown

Foo

IFoo

pAddRef

pRelease

pShake

pRattle

pRoll

pQueryInterface

pAddRef

pRelease

pQueryInterface

m _pU nkV tb l

m _pF ooV tb l

Q ueryInterface()

AddRef()

Release()

Shake()

Rattle()

Roll()

In-process Server(different apartment)

S TA

COM Invisible W indow

IU nknown

O ink_Stub

IFoo

IBarIU nknown

O ink

IFoo

IBar

IU nknown

O ink_Proxy

IFoo

IBar

Client Code

S TA

Local Server

IU nknown

Foo_P roxy

IFoo

pAddRef_Proxy

pRelease_Proxy

pShake_Proxy

pRattle_Proxy

pRoll_Proxy

pQueryInterface_Proxy

pAddRef_Proxy

pRelease_Proxy

pQueryInterface_Proxy

m _pU nkV tb l

m _pF ooV tb l

Q ueryIn te rface_P roxy()

A ddR e f_P roxy()

R e lease_P roxy()

S hake_P roxy()

R a ttle_P roxy()

R o ll_P roxy()

Q ueryIn te rface_S tub()

S hake_S tub()

R a ttle_S tub()

R o ll_S tub ()

P rocessB oundary

IFoo

IU nknown

Foo

m _pU nkV tb l

m _pF ooV tb l

IPC

Remote Server

IU nknown

Foo_P roxy

IFoo

pAddRef_Proxy

pRelease_Proxy

pShake_Proxy

pRattle_Proxy

pRoll_Proxy

pQueryInterface_Proxy

pAddRef_Proxy

pRelease_Proxy

pQueryInterface_Proxy

m _pU nkV tb l

m _pF ooV tb l

Q ueryIn te rface_P roxy()

A ddR e f_P roxy()

R e lease_P roxy()

S hake_P roxy()

R a ttle_P roxy()

R o ll_P roxy()

Q ueryIn te rface_S tub()

S hake_S tub()

R a ttle_S tub()

R o ll_S tub ()

IFoo

IU nknown

Foo

m _pU nkV tb l

m _pF ooV tb l

C lien tM ach ine

S erverM ach ine

MS-RPC

Things To Note• All interface method calls are synchronous; a

remote call to a New York server must complete its round-trip before the client can continue execution

• Asynchronous services are available through Microsoft Message Queue (MSMQ) and ICallFactory (Windows 2000)

• Encryption, authentication, and impersonation services are available with remote server connections (at least on NT)

Confused?

Where Am I?

The Guy In The Back Row

COM Owns You

So what does all this nonsense about location transparency and reference counting have to do with anything?

Ever heard of OLE? Ever heard of ActiveX? You may suspect that these have something to do with COM...

WRONG!

They are COM.

All will soon be clear

MS Marketecture:Common Misperceptions

• OLE is a system of linking and embedding data into a document (hence the acronym “Object Link and Embedding”)

• ActiveX, like Java, is a system for building web page applets

• Microsoft Transaction Server (MTS) processes business data from the internet

Faery Tales!

The Journey of COM

• Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) was introduced while the Earth was still cooling.

• DDE was unsavory. MS unveils OLE 1.0 after the villagers riot

• OLE 1.0 is a big success but hard to program. MS unveils OLE 2.0 for Windows 3.1: COM is born (it’s 16bit)

• Windows NT 3.5 is blessed with OLE (look ma - no version number!) and true 32bit COM. OLE is now “Olè,” which is synonymous with COM

The Journey of COM (II)

• To celebrate Windows 95, MS blesses COM with the apartment model

• 1996 sees Windows NT 4. DCOM brings network and multithreading enhancements to COM

• Microsoft Transaction Server (MTS) becomes available for NT Server. This doesn’t process web business data. It’s a COM runtime environment which allows components to run more efficiently (solving scalability difficulties often faced in processing business data)

The Journey of COM (III)

• OLE-DB provides consistency when accessing data from a variety of providers

• MS makes web browsers a priority (IE3) and simultaneously coins the term “ActiveX,” adding to the COM marketecture. Like OLE, ActiveX is a synonym for COM.

• Microsoft Message Queue (MSMQ) delivers asynchronous (and vastly more reliable) method calls

• Visual C++ 5.0 ships with ATL 2.1. OLE Control creation has never been so easy!

The Journey of COM (IV)• Windows 2000 ships in 2004. Microsoft introduces

COM+ acronym: COM+ is simply COM on Win2k• Win2k includes many COM updates including a third

threading model (the Neutral Threaded Apartment) and integration of MTS into the COM runtimes

• COM+ 2.0 delivers legendary COM virtual machine• Windows NT 6 device contexts replaced by

DirectDraw surfaces. Classic OLE Control interfaces deprecated for new, ultra-spiffy interfaces

COMprehension

• COM is a set of many, many technologies.

• COM is really Microsoft’s software engineering strategy

• Computer people (you) are betting the bank on Microsoft

• Microsoft is betting the bank on COM

• COM Owns You

COM Defined

A single sentence can’t define COM, because COM is such a monumental and omnipresent set of technologies.

So what is a COM technology? Any software creation that leverages interfaces and coclasses, as described in the earlier slides.

COM in Everyday Life

The Month View is from the Microsoft Windows CommonControls-2 6.0 controls library

Property Pages

How does Visual Basic know which properties to put in the box?

Events

How does Visual Basic know which events the control exposes?

What is a VB Control?

What Functionality Does It Expose?

Properties and Methods

The Secret of Property Pages

Property Page Coclasses

Property Pages Abound!

Standard Interfaces• Programming sucks. Best to fall back on

platform-provided functionality

• A container/client can interact with any server/control simply by implementing the required site interfaces

• Application developers who license your components are already familiar with the interfaces

• Standard interfaces can use the Microsoft-provided proxy/stubs

What Are Some COM-Based Technologies?

• OLE Controls• OLE-DB• ADO• DAO• DirectX• TAPI 3.0• Exchange Server• Exchange Client• Active Scripting

• CDO 2.0• MAPI• SQL-DMO• SQL-NS• Microsoft Repository• Broadcast Architecture• Still Image API• Microsoft Multimedia• Indexing Service

Still More COM Technologies!• Active Desktop• IIS• Microsoft Agent• Microsoft Java SDK• NetMeeting• NetShow• Microsoft Wallet• Active Directory• Active Accessibility• Clustering Service

• Fax Services• MSMQ• RAS• Synchronization Manager• Structured Storage• MTS• MMC• Windows Shell API• all OLE Applications

The Glory of COM• COM eliminates thread synchronization and

IPC/RPC confusion• COM enables real polymorphism: language

transparency and location transparency• COM mandates a consistency among

component interfaces to reduce learning curves• COM allows versionless updates• COM is the best component standard: it is by

far the most commercially successful

DLL Server Mechanisms

• DllRegisterServer and DllUnregisterServer manipulate the registry

• DllCanUnloadNow tells COM when the module is not being used

• DllGetClassObject provides the client with the class factory of the required COM object

EXE Server Mechanisms

• A /RegServer argument registers the EXE

• A /UnregServer argument un-registers the EXE

• CoRegisterClassObject registers a class factory for clients to connect to

• RegisterActiveObject adds an object to the Running Object Table (ROT)

COM Object Instantiation

• CoGetClassObject (wrapped by CoCreateInstance and CoCreateInstanceEx) launches a module and retrieves its class factory

• CoGetClassObjectFromURL downloads a module from an URL, decompresses it, registers it, and invokes CoGetClassObject on it

• GetActiveObject loads an object off the ROT

COM Security

• CoInitializeSecurity sets the authentication requirements for the current process

• The COSERVERINFO structure specifies the machine name and authentication info for clients connecting to remote objects

• CoImpersonateClient allows the server to impersonate the client when accessing other servers

Books of COMpetency

• The C++ Programming Language (Bjarne Stroustrup)

• Programming Windows (Charles Petzold)

• Advanced Windows (Jeffrey Richter)

• Design Patterns (Gamma, Helm, Johnson, Vlissides)

• Essential COM (Don Box)

Hoorah For Reading!

• Effective COM (Box, Brown, Ewald, Sells)• Inside OLE (Kraig Brockschmidt)• Professional ATL COM Programming

(Richard Grimes)• Microsoft Systems Journal

(www.microsoft.com/msj)• Sean’s Web Page

(www.eburg.com/~baxters/)

May the COM Be With You

Thank You