collective behaviour & social movements precipitating conditions

Collective Behaviour & Social Movements

Precipitating Conditions

Precipitating Conditions

When attempting to understand either collective behaviours or social movements a strategy has been to observe precipitating conditions.

 •What conditions give rise to collective behaviours or social movements?• 

Collective Behaviour happens

• Collective behavior can mean challenge to unjust authority, liberation and renewal.

• It may demonstrate humans at their most moral and heroic.

• It can also involve destruction, irrationality, barbarism and the most self-serving and least honorable of human qualities

• Is it nature? Lebon believed so,

• Is it nurture? This is the view of the SI theorist.

• Your own personal values emerge in context.

• This partly represents spontaneous factors characterizing any complex social enterprise.

• But it also reflects the ever-finer honing of the technology and the expansion of the resources needed for producing collective behavior

• A citizenry informed in these matters is a necessary condition for political democracy, rationality and individual freedom

• Collective behavior is unstructured or unorganized behavior.

• defining the behavior as emergent

Social Movement/precipating conditions

• Tilly argues that the early growth of social movements was connected to broad economic and political changes including:

1.  parliamentarization,

2. market capitalization,

3. and proletarianization

Social Movements Rise when

• Democracy-first parliamentary, then republican-US & France

• Industry- moves away from feudalism

• Proletarianization-distinctive class consciousness

19th Strain, Industry and Proletarianization

• Poor working conditions-15hr days, no

• Poor hygene

• Overcrowding

• Crime

• Poverty

Marx’s Solution

• Alienated labour

• =Class consciousness

• First class in history aware of their plight

• Workers should not accept anything less than SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION

• Reform is only a half way measure

IWA Movement

• 1. Structural Strain- somehow the system is not working

• 2. Ideological Shift -right to left

• 3. Catalyst - spark

IWA

• The First International showed how difficult it was to unite people when movement seemed abstract and distant.

• English Workers could organize, French could not, Canada was still quite agricultural.

Example

• In 1862, the First International was formed.

• Shows the push to left and its difficulty

• The experiences of workers varied from country to country but by in large, they began to unite.

Different Positions on IWW’s importance

• Some saw Internationals as a way of protecting workers from foreign labour power.

• Others saw International as a way of “smashing the capitalist state.

• Some were in favour of violence, others were not.

Other Ideological Differences

• Proudhon advocated non-violence

• Believed that early co-operative were an indication that the entire economy could gradually transform.

Marx

• Tries to put Socialism into practice• Opposed bourgeois socialism, opposed

Sects, opposed the Petite Bourgeoisie.

• Question: How is it possible to organize a large number of people, spread across great distances without sacrificing tolerance and diversity?

Problem of Bureaucratization

• Union officials, International representatives, different countries, back and forth may take 6 months.

• Worker horizontal relations (worker to worker) ends up being to down-from Union bosses

Other Problems

• Organized labour movement• And Union Movement

• Is it possible for Workers of the World to Unite given the nature of:

• organizations, • networks • and alliances.????

• Seeing the complexity of the precipitating condition for Movements such as IWA and later the IWW.

• The social movement literature since the 1970’s emphasizes the differences not the similarities between collective behaviour and social movements.

•

Social movements

•  

• Social movements are purposive, goal directed, organizations…scholars now look for the dynamics of social movements and social organizations.

• Leadership roles undergo elaboration Intiation of self and other appointments

• Committees formed

• Resources must be mobilized 

Types of Collectivities:

• Differ According to  

• Member oriented groups

• Religious communities

• Protest groups

Articulation

• Mainstream vs. subcultural values

• Membership compliance-pure ideologists, backsliders, free riders

Achievement

• Based Upon: whether the collectivity pursues change in the existing order-social, political, moral

• Or focuses on service to membership (AA)• whether the climate of public opinion is

favourable or unfavourable

Concentration-

• Social or member issues vs. public opinion

• Internal vs. External Target?•

Does a movement require

• additional public support,

• greater resources, • larger membership

•  Public Support for Cultish Groups ie. Moonies-deprogramming, programming,  

Expressive vs. Instrumental-

• Expressive groups -member serving, influence peddling, strategies of secrecy, isolation, strict boundaries.

• Instrument groups -social control through isolation and socialization,

People Serving Groups-

•  Favourable environmental support-ie self improvement groups or lifestyle change groups.

• Simpler strategies, more evolutionary in nature

Resource mobilization theory

• Resource mobilization theory in particular, argues that there is no automatic relationship between mass mobilization and a movement’s success.

• Its focus is on the organization (middle or meso level) and on the larger structures called institutions…

Emphasis is on the

• Rationality,

• Planning

• Institutional involvements in social movements…

CONFLICT THEORY

• INSTITUTIONS ARE DEVELOPED AND MAINTAINED BY THE RULING CLASS

• THE TWO KEY INSTITUTIONS ARE THE POLITICAL AND THE ECONOMIC.

• UNLIKE ADAM SMITH, MARX WAS A POLITICAL ECONOMIST

INSTITUTIONS

• ORGANIZE HUMAN SOCIETY

• DIRECT HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AND ACTIVE

• Are the means through which most change occurs..

• Structural Functionalists call this adaptation.

Political economy

• The key to class conflict…a capitalistic society is sustained by:

•  

• a.      exchange of commodified labour power

• b.     electoral-representative political system

American bourgeoisie

•  

• The American bourgeoisie has created new markets or tailored existing ones to further its economic, political and ideological objectives.

•  

Political Economists Maintain that…

• States tolerate markets, occasionally regulate or shut them down, but always shape the realm of possibilities-to exploit, to organize, to struggle-available actors in markets.

•  

Problems with Marxism

• How does one put theory into practice?

• How is it possible for workers to unite when they are so diverse, and different?

• Social Movement-emergent-define themselves against adversaries in a process.

• Adversaries….are organized collectivities with perceptible boundaries.

• Social Movement seek to set up a dichotomy between the establishment and movement.

• They are engaged in a war with an adversarial class….

Marx Quote

•Classes are not simply objective (born out of social relations of production) rather they are often motivated by the struggles of the actors to define themselves against their adversaries….as organized collectivities with perceptible boundaries.

• Indeed an interest of any one class is usually to disorganize,

• either directly or indirectly via manipulation • of the state or market, • to render it ineffective as an organized

collectively pursuing its often different, occasionally antagonistic, interests….

• The International Workingmen's Association (IWA), commonly known as the First International, was established in London in 1864. The organization was initially strictly European in composition, including prominently English, French, German, Polish, and Italian labor leaders and political activists.

• .

In the US

• For some, it had modest goals of raising wages, lowering working hours, and liberalizing election law through international cooperation,

• For others, the construction of an international organization as a tool for the winning of state power from the bourgeoisie.

• This means that movements can occur on either the right or left of the political spectrum.

• The owners of the means of production are equally effective in mounting opposition to social forces.

Precipitating Conditions

When attempting to understand either collective behaviours or social movements a strategy has been to observe precipitating conditions.

 •What conditions give rise to collective behaviours or social movements?• 

For Example

• The IWW began in the United States in 1905

• It held on to the belief that ONE BIG Union could be formed

In response Example:

•  

• Research Question: How did capital resist organization and mobilization during the pre-New Deal period between 1902-1928.:

Capital launched two major counter-movements:

Designed to resist Unionism • a.      open shop drive 1903-13

• b.     American Plan. (essentially the same movement)

Crusade against unionism.  

• The Chamber of Commerce and the National Grange pursued identical strategies as the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) National Civic Foundation (NCF).

• Each of the above waged a crusade against unionism.

•  

Union Busting Strategies: 

•  

• 1. They accused the unionists as having the same aim as the Socialists….The NAM adopted a hostile policy to unions by advocating an open shop strategy….

•  

•  

• 2, Ideology precipitates a movement or a countermovement: for example, NAM sought to inform the public about the “true nature of unionism”… 

• 3. They used money, the political center, and moral persuasion….Cooperated with a number of newly formed anti-union associations…..

• 4. They formed the National Council of Industrial Defense to defeat candidates and legislation pertaining to wages, hours and working conditions.

•  

•  

• 5.     National Civic Foundation-essentially dismantled the union movement-espoused a conservative and responsible unionism-some workers compensation to curb rapacious competition…. However, the NCF’s lofty ideology of tolerance and conciliation was never matched in practice

Results

•  

• a.      capitalists diminished the unity of the working class…divide and conquer-new system of scientific management, factor administration, mechanization of labour

• b.     Drew upon the heterogeneity of immigrant labour..reserve army, immigrants do not trust each other

• c.      skill differentiatials by selectively hiring or firing particular groups, keep groups together with no common tongue

• d.     mechanization led to the replacement of the craftsmen with semi-skill workers thereby undermining the monopoly of production knowledge

•  

• e. job hierarchies, specialized operations, incentive pay, managerial domination kills the “collective worker”

Political Changes

• a.      technical control-autmonization employee representation (individual grievances used as a management tool)

• b.     employee savings plans• c.      boycotting union goods• d.     hiring union spies• e.      use of propaganda

•  

• This article shows that social movements can be movements from the Right…

• Right Wing Social movements designed to preserve the status quo and maintain bourgeois hegemony….

Capital’s success in disorganizing the working class• Cost the worker dearly.

• It mobilization and collective action were hindered;

• its economic advancement in the market was visibly slowed;

• its understanding of itself as a collectivity with common struggles and objectives was shattered.

•  

• Fragmentation, internal cleavages cost the working class its struggle for equality and fairness……

•  

Antigonish Movement in Nova Scotia

• Bantjes’ hypothesis:

• “The state actively supports workers where there is a perceived threat that working people would otherwise organize their own, much more radical anti-capitalist movements.|

CCF ISSUE

• Could capitalists large or small, invested in private property ever break free of capitalism?

• Would they, as Lenin argued, “show their capitalist face”?

• Commonwealth cooperative federation was successful in moving Canada’s political spectrum.

• It was left wing movement counter by the Social Credit Movement in Alberta.

CCF

• DID BECOME CO-OPTED

• Transformed Canada’s political culture

• Social democratic reforms now part of the system

• Have adapted pragmatically to Canada’s parliamentary landscape

Overall Co-op Issue

• What would have happened if the State maintained a repressive stance against workers?

• Marx assumed militancy never happened situations were complex.

Summary

• The precipating political conditions are key to understanding the formation of social movement.

• The political environment swings between left and right.