clustering asas applications asas-tn2 first workshop, malmö 26 to 28 september 2005 fraser mcgibbon...
Post on 30-Dec-2015
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Clustering ASAS Applications
ASAS-TN2 First Workshop, Malmö26 to 28 September 2005
Fraser McGibbonBAE Systems
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 2
Contents
• Objectives of ASAS clustering
• Background to ASAS clustering
• Characteristics and Requirements of ASAS applications
• Definition of ASAS Clusters
• Clustering Table
• Examples of how the Clustering Table can be used
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 3
Objectives of ASAS Clustering
• To group ASAS applications by similar characteristics, for example:
– Operational goal
– Operational procedures for controllers and flight crew
– Requirements on aircraft systems supporting ASAS
– Requirements on ATC systems
– Who are the decision makers
– Who benefits
• ASAS clusters will form homogeneous sets of applications which will enable the
structuring of development and deployment plans to support ASAS-TN2 WP3
(ASAS Application Maturity)
• Additionally, Clustering ASAS applications can also provide a useful decision
making tool to allow airlines, ANSPs or airports to answer the following questions:
– What can I do with …?
– What do I need to do if I want to …?
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 4
Background
• PO-ASAS* defines the following packages of airborne applications:
– Package 1:• Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness (ATSA)• Airborne Spacing (ASPA)
– Package 2:• Airborne Separation (ASEP)
– Package 3:• Airborne Self-separation (SSEP)
• Ground surveillance (ADS-B) applications have been included in Package 1
• Runway Incursion Alerting applications have been included in Package 2/3
Airspace users through JAFTI (Joint User Requirements Group [JURG] ADS-B Fast Track Initiative) consider Package 1 applications as the first “building block”
which will be the basis for further Packages, enabling high benefits.
This position has been endorsed by EUROCONTROL, FAA and ICAO.
*Principles of Operation for the Use of Airborne Separation Assurance Systems (PO-ASAS), version 7.1, FAA / EUROCONTROL, 19 June 2001
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 5
Characteristics and Requirements of ASAS Applications
Airborne Equipment•ADS-B in•ADS-B out•CDTI•Pilot Guidance•Safety Criticality
Ground Infrastructure•Modified Ground Display•Controller Tools•ADS-B Receiver•TIS-B Transmitter
Progress•e.g. Concepts, Standards, Simulations, Trials
•By whom?
Near Term Benefit•e.g. Safety, Economic, Efficiency, Capacity, Situational Awareness
•In which airspace region?
Decision Makers• i.e. Airline, Regulator, Airport or ANSP
•Single or Multiple
Training• i.e. Pilots or ATCos
Who invests•e.g. Airline, ANSP, Airport
Competing or Complementary
Solutions
Role and Implications
ASASASAS
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 6
ASAS Clustering – Package 1 Applications
Airborne Spacing (ASPA)
• Enhanced Crossing and Passing Operations (ASPA-C&P)
• Enhanced Sequencing and Merging Operations (ASPA-S&M)
Ground Surveillance
• ATC Surveillance on the Airport Surface (ADS-B-APT)
• ATC Surveillance in Radar Airspace (ADS-B-RAD)
• ATC Surveillance in Non-Radar Airspace (ADS-B-NRA)
• Aircraft Derived Data for Ground Tools (ADS-B-ADD)
Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness (ATSA)• Enhanced Traffic Situational Awareness during Flight Operations (ATSA-AIRB)• Traffic Situational Awareness on the Airport Surface (ATSA-SURF)• In-Trail Procedure in Oceanic Airspace (ATSA-ITP)• Enhanced Visual Separation on Approach (ATSA-VSA)
All currently
being defined
by the RFG…
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 7
ASAS Clustering – Package 2 and 3 Applications
Self Separation (SSEP)
• Self-Separation in an Organised Track System (SSEP-OTS)
• Self-Separation in Segregated Free Flight Airspace (SSEP-FFAS)
• Self-Separation in Managed Airspace (SSEP-MAS)
Airborne Separation (ASEP)
• Lateral Crossing and Passing (ASEP-LC&P)
• Vertical Crossing and Passing (ASEP-VC&P)
• In-Trail Follow (ASEP-ITF)
• Flight Level Change (ASEP-FLC)
Alerting for Runway Incursion
• Airborne Tool
• Ground Tool
Currently being investigated in
ASSTAR, NUP II and other
programmes
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 8
Clustering Spreadsheet
Application Airborne Equipment Ground Infrastructure Progress Airborne Integrity Role Implications Near term Benefit Decision Makers Training Who invests Competing/
Pk Long Name Short Name ADS-B out ADS-B In CDTIGuidance (for pilot)
OtherModified Ground Display
Controller Tools
ADS-B Rx TIS-B Tx
(e.g. Concept, Standards, Simulation, Trials, and by whom?)
A/B/C/D (see DO 178B)
notes
(When and why used, links with other concepts) Type Area
(Equipment and Training)
(Airlines/ ANSP/ Airport)
Complementary Solution
Enhanced traffic situational awareness during flight operations
ATSA-AIRBAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes No None No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP, MFF
CHigher if used for routine decision making
Supplements traffic information supplied by ATCos and other flight crews
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Situational Awareness (not for decision making)
All areasAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and ANSP (if TIS-B used)
None
Traffic situational awareness on the airport surface
ATSA-SURFAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes NoTaxi Map desirable
No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP CHigher if used for routine decision making
Used for safety, not for navigation. Linked to surface traffic alerts.
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Safety LocalAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and Airport (if TIS-B)
Multilateration and TIS-B
In-trail procedure in oceanic airspace
ATSA-ITP (aka AIFLC)
All aircraft involved
Own ship Optional
Flight path vector of adjacent aircraft, decision support useful
ADS-C Desirable
Desirable if ADS-C available
No No No RFG, NLR, NASA CAllows access to optimum flight levels
EconomicOceanic/ Remote
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
No
1Enhanced visual separation on approach
ATSA-VSATarget aircraft
Following aircraft
Yes NoHUD Optional for target acquisition
No No No No RFG, FAA, NASA C
Visual contact to be maintained with the preceding aircraft throughout the application
Rules for transition to non-visual approach unclear
Capacity Local AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
Enhanced crossing and passing operations
ASPA-C&PTarget aircraft
Own ship Optional Yes None NoYes, including alerting
No No RFG (Low priority) C
Assuming spacing application but in practice unlikely
Link with ATCo conflict detection and resolution tools
May not be viable as spacing task
Efficiency Regional AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
Current Procedures
Enhanced sequencing and merging operations
ASPA-S&MAll target aircraft
All following aircraft
Optional Yes NoneDesirable (aircraft coupling lines)
No No No RFG (Fast Track) CLink with CDA, AMAN and DMAN. Link with 4D for en-route sequencing
Capacity/ Efficiency
Local/ Regional
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
ATC surveillance on the airport surface
ADS-B-APT All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP A or C A if only meansFor safer and more efficient ATC ground movements
Full equipage or surveillance data fusion
Safety/ Efficiency Local Single Airport Controllers Airport and AirlineMultilateration and Radar
ATC surveillance in radar airspace
ADS-B-RADDepends on use
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG C?depending on use
Supplements radar coverage
Radar/ADS-B fusion, accuracy improvements?
Efficiency Local Single ANSP Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Aircraft derived data for ground tools
ADS-B-ADDAll aircraft (depending on use)
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A RFG (Low priority) Cdepending on use
Link with CDM
May need datalink upgrade for additional parameters
Capacity and Efficiency
Regional Single/Multiple ANSP(s) Controllers Airline and ANSP None
ATC surveillance in non-radar area
ADS-B-NRA All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes NoRFG (Fast Track), Air Services Australia
C or B? As good as radarTo provide radar like service
Full equipage CapacityLocal/ Regional
Regulator (mandate) Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Lateral Crossing and Passing
ASEP-LC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
ASPA-C&P as a separation application. Addressed lateral case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Vertical Crossing and Passing
ASEP-VC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDAddressed vertical Crossing and Passing case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
In-Trail Follow ASEP-ITF All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
Yes TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
Conceptually similar to ASPA-S&M (remain behind) but this application for non-radar areas
Higher integrity than Package 1
CapacityOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
2 or 3 Flight Level Change ASEP-FLC All involved Own ship Desirable Yes ?None Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDConceptually similar to ATSA-ITP but as a separation application
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Runway Incursion Alerting (airborne)
All aircraft All aircraft YesResolution Advisories
Alerting System and Runway Info
N/A N/A N/A N/AMA-AFAS, NUP II, EMMA, SLATS
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local Airline PilotsAirline and ANSP (unless using TIS-B)
None
Runway Incursion Alerting (ground tool)
All aircraft N/A N/A N/APossible datalink alert to aircraft
Yes YesNot essential if radar
No MA-AFAS, NUP II TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local ANSPPilots (if datalink alert) and Controllers
Airline and ANSPGround radar and SMGCS
Self separation in an Organised Track System
SSEP-OTS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A ASSTAR TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in segregated Free Flight Airspace
SSEP-FFAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/ANLR, NASA, INTENT, MFF
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in Managed Airspace
SSEP-MAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A NASA Langley TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Efficiency Regional ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 9
Clustering Spreadsheet (ASPA-S&M Example)
Application Airborne Equipment Ground Infrastructure Progress Airborne Integrity Role Implications Near term Benefit Decision Makers Training Who invests Competing/
Pk Long Name Short Name ADS-B out ADS-B In CDTIGuidance (for pilot)
OtherModified Ground Display
Controller Tools
ADS-B Rx TIS-B Tx
(e.g. Concept, Standards, Simulation, Trials, and by whom?)
A/B/C/D (see DO 178B)
notes
(When and why used, links with other concepts) Type Area
(Equipment and Training)
(Airlines/ ANSP/ Airport)
Complementary Solution
Enhanced traffic situational awareness during flight operations
ATSA-AIRBAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes No None No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP, MFF
CHigher if used for routine decision making
Supplements traffic information supplied by ATCos and other flight crews
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Situational Awareness (not for decision making)
All areasAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and ANSP (if TIS-B used)
None
Traffic situational awareness on the airport surface
ATSA-SURFAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes NoTaxi Map desirable
No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP CHigher if used for routine decision making
Used for safety, not for navigation. Linked to surface traffic alerts.
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Safety LocalAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and Airport (if TIS-B)
Multilateration and TIS-B
In-trail procedure in oceanic airspace
ATSA-ITP (aka AIFLC)
All aircraft involved
Own ship Optional
Flight path vector of adjacent aircraft, decision support useful
ADS-C Desirable
Desirable if ADS-C available
No No No RFG, NLR, NASA CAllows access to optimum flight levels
EconomicOceanic/ Remote
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
No
1Enhanced visual separation on approach
ATSA-VSATarget aircraft
Following aircraft
Yes NoHUD Optional for target acquisition
No No No No RFG, FAA, NASA C
Visual contact to be maintained with the preceding aircraft throughout the application
Rules for transition to non-visual approach unclear
Capacity Local AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
Enhanced crossing and passing operations
ASPA-C&PTarget aircraft
Own ship Optional Yes None NoYes, including alerting
No No RFG (Low priority) C
Assuming spacing application but in practice unlikely
Link with ATCo conflict detection and resolution tools
May not be viable as spacing task
Efficiency Regional AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
Current Procedures
Enhanced sequencing and merging operations
ASPA-S&MAll target aircraft
All following aircraft
Optional Yes NoneDesirable (aircraft coupling lines)
No No No RFG (Fast Track) CLink with CDA, AMAN and DMAN. Link with 4D for en-route sequencing
Capacity/ Efficiency
Local/ Regional
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
ATC surveillance on the airport surface
ADS-B-APT All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP A or C A if only meansFor safer and more efficient ATC ground movements
Full equipage or surveillance data fusion
Safety/ Efficiency Local Single Airport Controllers Airport and AirlineMultilateration and Radar
ATC surveillance in radar airspace
ADS-B-RADDepends on use
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG C?depending on use
Supplements radar coverage
Radar/ADS-B fusion, accuracy improvements?
Efficiency Local Single ANSP Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Aircraft derived data for ground tools
ADS-B-ADDAll aircraft (depending on use)
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A RFG (Low priority) Cdepending on use
Link with CDM
May need datalink upgrade for additional parameters
Capacity and Efficiency
Regional Single/Multiple ANSP(s) Controllers Airline and ANSP None
ATC surveillance in non-radar area
ADS-B-NRA All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes NoRFG (Fast Track), Air Services Australia
C or B? As good as radarTo provide radar like service
Full equipage CapacityLocal/ Regional
Regulator (mandate) Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Lateral Crossing and Passing
ASEP-LC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
ASPA-C&P as a separation application. Addressed lateral case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Vertical Crossing and Passing
ASEP-VC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDAddressed vertical Crossing and Passing case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
In-Trail Follow ASEP-ITF All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
Yes TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
Conceptually similar to ASPA-S&M (remain behind) but this application for non-radar areas
Higher integrity than Package 1
CapacityOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
2 or 3 Flight Level Change ASEP-FLC All involved Own ship Desirable Yes ?None Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDConceptually similar to ATSA-ITP but as a separation application
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Runway Incursion Alerting (airborne)
All aircraft All aircraft YesResolution Advisories
Alerting System and Runway Info
N/A N/A N/A N/AMA-AFAS, NUP II, EMMA, SLATS
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local Airline PilotsAirline and ANSP (unless using TIS-B)
None
Runway Incursion Alerting (ground tool)
All aircraft N/A N/A N/APossible datalink alert to aircraft
Yes YesNot essential if radar
No MA-AFAS, NUP II TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local ANSPPilots (if datalink alert) and Controllers
Airline and ANSPGround radar and SMGCS
Self separation in an Organised Track System
SSEP-OTS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A ASSTAR TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in segregated Free Flight Airspace
SSEP-FFAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/ANLR, NASA, INTENT, MFF
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in Managed Airspace
SSEP-MAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A NASA Langley TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Efficiency Regional ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 10
Using the Table
What can I do with …?
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 11
CDTI
Ground Display / ATCo Tools
Pilot Guidance
ATSA-AIRB
ATSA-ITP
ASPA-C&P
ASPA-S&M
ASEP-LC&P
ASEP-VC&P
ASEP-ITFASEP-FLC
SSEP-MAS
Package 1Package 2/3
ATSA-VSA
Note: ADS-B / TIS-B assumed
SSEP-FFAS
SSEP-OTS
ASAS Clustering – Airborne Applications
ATSA-SURF
Surface Map
RunwayIncursion
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 12
ASAS Clustering – Ground Perspective
Modified Ground Display
ATCo ToolsADS-B
Receiver
Package 1Package 2/3
Note: ADS-B out assumed
ADS-B-APT
ADS-B-RAD
ADS-B-NRA
ADS-B-ADD
RunwayIncursion
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 13
Using the Table
What do I need to do if I want to …?
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 14
What do I need to do if I want to … ?
ANSP
“I am an ANSP who provides the ATC service for a busy hub airport with a dominant carrier. What do I need to do to improve efficiency and increase
capacity of my terminal airspace?”
Airport
“I am an airport operator who manages an airport frequently affected by fog. What do I need to do to improve safety and efficiency during low visibility
conditions?”
Airline
“I am an airline who is often not able to fly the most efficient flight profile in oceanic airspace. What do I need to do to increase flight efficiency and
reduce my operating costs?”
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 15
Airline(Increase efficiency and reduce operating costs in oceanic airspace)
Application Airborne Equipment Ground Infrastructure Progress Airborne Integrity Role Implications Near term Benefit Decision Makers Training Who invests Competing/
Pk Long Name Short Name ADS-B out ADS-B In CDTIGuidance (for pilot)
OtherModified Ground Display
Controller Tools
ADS-B Rx TIS-B Tx
(e.g. Concept, Standards, Simulation, Trials, and by whom?)
A/B/C/D (see DO 178B)
notes
(When and why used, links with other concepts) Type Area
(Equipment and Training)
(Airlines/ ANSP/ Airport)
Complementary Solution
Enhanced traffic situational awareness during flight operations
ATSA-AIRBAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes No None No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP, MFF
CHigher if used for routine decision making
Supplements traffic information supplied by ATCos and other flight crews
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Situational Awareness (not for decision making)
All areasAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and ANSP (if TIS-B used)
None
Traffic situational awareness on the airport surface
ATSA-SURFAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes NoTaxi Map desirable
No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP CHigher if used for routine decision making
Used for safety, not for navigation. Linked to surface traffic alerts.
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Safety LocalAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and Airport (if TIS-B)
Multilateration and TIS-B
In-trail procedure in oceanic airspace
ATSA-ITP (aka AIFLC)
All aircraft involved
Own ship Optional
Flight path vector of adjacent aircraft, decision support useful
ADS-C Desirable
Desirable if ADS-C available
No No No RFG, NLR, NASA CAllows access to optimum flight levels
EconomicOceanic/ Remote
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
No
1Enhanced visual separation on approach
ATSA-VSATarget aircraft
Following aircraft
Yes NoHUD Optional for target acquisition
No No No No RFG, FAA, NASA C
Visual contact to be maintained with the preceding aircraft throughout the application
Rules for transition to non-visual approach unclear
Capacity Local AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
Enhanced crossing and passing operations
ASPA-C&PTarget aircraft
Own ship Optional Yes None NoYes, including alerting
No No RFG (Low priority) C
Assuming spacing application but in practice unlikely
Link with ATCo conflict detection and resolution tools
May not be viable as spacing task
Efficiency Regional AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
Current Procedures
Enhanced sequencing and merging operations
ASPA-S&MAll target aircraft
All following aircraft
Optional Yes NoneDesirable (aircraft coupling lines)
No No No RFG (Fast Track) CLink with CDA, AMAN and DMAN. Link with 4D for en-route sequencing
Capacity/ Efficiency
Local/ Regional
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
ATC surveillance on the airport surface
ADS-B-APT All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP A or C A if only meansFor safer and more efficient ATC ground movements
Full equipage or surveillance data fusion
Safety/ Efficiency Local Single Airport Controllers Airport and AirlineMultilateration and Radar
ATC surveillance in radar airspace
ADS-B-RADDepends on use
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG C?depending on use
Supplements radar coverage
Radar/ADS-B fusion, accuracy improvements?
Efficiency Local Single ANSP Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Aircraft derived data for ground tools
ADS-B-ADDAll aircraft (depending on use)
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A RFG (Low priority) Cdepending on use
Link with CDM
May need datalink upgrade for additional parameters
Capacity and Efficiency
Regional Single/Multiple ANSP(s) Controllers Airline and ANSP None
ATC surveillance in non-radar area
ADS-B-NRA All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes NoRFG (Fast Track), Air Services Australia
C or B? As good as radarTo provide radar like service
Full equipage CapacityLocal/ Regional
Regulator (mandate) Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Lateral Crossing and Passing
ASEP-LC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
ASPA-C&P as a separation application. Addressed lateral case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Vertical Crossing and Passing
ASEP-VC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDAddressed vertical Crossing and Passing case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
In-Trail Follow ASEP-ITF All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
Yes TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
Conceptually similar to ASPA-S&M (remain behind) but this application for non-radar areas
Higher integrity than Package 1
CapacityOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
2 or 3 Flight Level Change ASEP-FLC All involved Own ship Desirable Yes ?None Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDConceptually similar to ATSA-ITP but as a separation application
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Runway Incursion Alerting (airborne)
All aircraft All aircraft YesResolution Advisories
Alerting System and Runway Info
N/A N/A N/A N/AMA-AFAS, NUP II, EMMA, SLATS
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local Airline PilotsAirline and ANSP (unless using TIS-B)
None
Runway Incursion Alerting (ground tool)
All aircraft N/A N/A N/APossible datalink alert to aircraft
Yes YesNot essential if radar
No MA-AFAS, NUP II TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local ANSPPilots (if datalink alert) and Controllers
Airline and ANSPGround radar and SMGCS
Self separation in an Organised Track System
SSEP-OTS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A ASSTAR TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in segregated Free Flight Airspace
SSEP-FFAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/ANLR, NASA, INTENT, MFF
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in Managed Airspace
SSEP-MAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A NASA Langley TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Efficiency Regional ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 16
ANSP(Improve efficiency and increase capacity for hub operations)
Application Airborne Equipment Ground Infrastructure Progress Airborne Integrity Role Implications Near term Benefit Decision Makers Training Who invests Competing/
Pk Long Name Short Name ADS-B out ADS-B In CDTIGuidance (for pilot)
OtherModified Ground Display
Controller Tools
ADS-B Rx TIS-B Tx
(e.g. Concept, Standards, Simulation, Trials, and by whom?)
A/B/C/D (see DO 178B)
notes
(When and why used, links with other concepts) Type Area
(Equipment and Training)
(Airlines/ ANSP/ Airport)
Complementary Solution
Enhanced traffic situational awareness during flight operations
ATSA-AIRBAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes No None No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP, MFF
CHigher if used for routine decision making
Supplements traffic information supplied by ATCos and other flight crews
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Situational Awareness (not for decision making)
All areasAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and ANSP (if TIS-B used)
None
Traffic situational awareness on the airport surface
ATSA-SURFAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes NoTaxi Map desirable
No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP CHigher if used for routine decision making
Used for safety, not for navigation. Linked to surface traffic alerts.
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Safety LocalAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and Airport (if TIS-B)
Multilateration and TIS-B
In-trail procedure in oceanic airspace
ATSA-ITP (aka AIFLC)
All aircraft involved
Own ship Optional
Flight path vector of adjacent aircraft, decision support useful
ADS-C Desirable
Desirable if ADS-C available
No No No RFG, NLR, NASA CAllows access to optimum flight levels
EconomicOceanic/ Remote
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
No
1Enhanced visual separation on approach
ATSA-VSATarget aircraft
Following aircraft
Yes NoHUD Optional for target acquisition
No No No No RFG, FAA, NASA C
Visual contact to be maintained with the preceding aircraft throughout the application
Rules for transition to non-visual approach unclear
Capacity Local AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
Enhanced crossing and passing operations
ASPA-C&PTarget aircraft
Own ship Optional Yes None NoYes, including alerting
No No RFG (Low priority) C
Assuming spacing application but in practice unlikely
Link with ATCo conflict detection and resolution tools
May not be viable as spacing task
Efficiency Regional AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
Current Procedures
Enhanced sequencing and merging operations
ASPA-S&MAll target aircraft
All following aircraft
Optional Yes NoneDesirable (aircraft coupling lines)
No No No RFG (Fast Track) CLink with CDA, AMAN and DMAN. Link with 4D for en-route sequencing
Capacity/ Efficiency
Local/ Regional
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
ATC surveillance on the airport surface
ADS-B-APT All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP A or C A if only meansFor safer and more efficient ATC ground movements
Full equipage or surveillance data fusion
Safety/ Efficiency Local Single Airport Controllers Airport and AirlineMultilateration and Radar
ATC surveillance in radar airspace
ADS-B-RADDepends on use
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG C?depending on use
Supplements radar coverage
Radar/ADS-B fusion, accuracy improvements?
Efficiency Local Single ANSP Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Aircraft derived data for ground tools
ADS-B-ADDAll aircraft (depending on use)
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A RFG (Low priority) Cdepending on use
Link with CDM
May need datalink upgrade for additional parameters
Capacity and Efficiency
Regional Single/Multiple ANSP(s) Controllers Airline and ANSP None
ATC surveillance in non-radar area
ADS-B-NRA All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes NoRFG (Fast Track), Air Services Australia
C or B? As good as radarTo provide radar like service
Full equipage CapacityLocal/ Regional
Regulator (mandate) Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Lateral Crossing and Passing
ASEP-LC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
ASPA-C&P as a separation application. Addressed lateral case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Vertical Crossing and Passing
ASEP-VC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDAddressed vertical Crossing and Passing case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
In-Trail Follow ASEP-ITF All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
Yes TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
Conceptually similar to ASPA-S&M (remain behind) but this application for non-radar areas
Higher integrity than Package 1
CapacityOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
2 or 3 Flight Level Change ASEP-FLC All involved Own ship Desirable Yes ?None Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDConceptually similar to ATSA-ITP but as a separation application
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Runway Incursion Alerting (airborne)
All aircraft All aircraft YesResolution Advisories
Alerting System and Runway Info
N/A N/A N/A N/AMA-AFAS, NUP II, EMMA, SLATS
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local Airline PilotsAirline and ANSP (unless using TIS-B)
None
Runway Incursion Alerting (ground tool)
All aircraft N/A N/A N/APossible datalink alert to aircraft
Yes YesNot essential if radar
No MA-AFAS, NUP II TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local ANSPPilots (if datalink alert) and Controllers
Airline and ANSPGround radar and SMGCS
Self separation in an Organised Track System
SSEP-OTS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A ASSTAR TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in segregated Free Flight Airspace
SSEP-FFAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/ANLR, NASA, INTENT, MFF
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in Managed Airspace
SSEP-MAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A NASA Langley TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Efficiency Regional ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 17
Application Airborne Equipment Ground Infrastructure Progress Airborne Integrity Role Implications Near term Benefit Decision Makers Training Who invests Competing/
Pk Long Name Short Name ADS-B out ADS-B In CDTIGuidance (for pilot)
OtherModified Ground Display
Controller Tools
ADS-B Rx TIS-B Tx
(e.g. Concept, Standards, Simulation, Trials, and by whom?)
A/B/C/D (see DO 178B)
notes
(When and why used, links with other concepts) Type Area
(Equipment and Training)
(Airlines/ ANSP/ Airport)
Complementary Solution
Enhanced traffic situational awareness during flight operations
ATSA-AIRBAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes No None No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP, MFF
CHigher if used for routine decision making
Supplements traffic information supplied by ATCos and other flight crews
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Situational Awareness (not for decision making)
All areasAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and ANSP (if TIS-B used)
None
Traffic situational awareness on the airport surface
ATSA-SURFAll aircraft or TIS-B support
All aircraft Yes NoTaxi Map desirable
No No NoYes, if not full ADS-B out equipage
RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP CHigher if used for routine decision making
Used for safety, not for navigation. Linked to surface traffic alerts.
Full equipage or TIS-B ground support
Safety LocalAirlines or Regulator (mandate)
PilotsAirline and Airport (if TIS-B)
Multilateration and TIS-B
In-trail procedure in oceanic airspace
ATSA-ITP (aka AIFLC)
All aircraft involved
Own ship Optional
Flight path vector of adjacent aircraft, decision support useful
ADS-C Desirable
Desirable if ADS-C available
No No No RFG, NLR, NASA CAllows access to optimum flight levels
EconomicOceanic/ Remote
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
No
1Enhanced visual separation on approach
ATSA-VSATarget aircraft
Following aircraft
Yes NoHUD Optional for target acquisition
No No No No RFG, FAA, NASA C
Visual contact to be maintained with the preceding aircraft throughout the application
Rules for transition to non-visual approach unclear
Capacity Local AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
Enhanced crossing and passing operations
ASPA-C&PTarget aircraft
Own ship Optional Yes None NoYes, including alerting
No No RFG (Low priority) C
Assuming spacing application but in practice unlikely
Link with ATCo conflict detection and resolution tools
May not be viable as spacing task
Efficiency Regional AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
Current Procedures
Enhanced sequencing and merging operations
ASPA-S&MAll target aircraft
All following aircraft
Optional Yes NoneDesirable (aircraft coupling lines)
No No No RFG (Fast Track) CLink with CDA, AMAN and DMAN. Link with 4D for en-route sequencing
Capacity/ Efficiency
Local/ Regional
AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP (Training)
None
ATC surveillance on the airport surface
ADS-B-APT All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG, MA-AFAS, NUP A or C A if only meansFor safer and more efficient ATC ground movements
Full equipage or surveillance data fusion
Safety/ Efficiency Local Single Airport Controllers Airport and AirlineMultilateration and Radar
ATC surveillance in radar airspace
ADS-B-RADDepends on use
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes No RFG C?depending on use
Supplements radar coverage
Radar/ADS-B fusion, accuracy improvements?
Efficiency Local Single ANSP Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Aircraft derived data for ground tools
ADS-B-ADDAll aircraft (depending on use)
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A RFG (Low priority) Cdepending on use
Link with CDM
May need datalink upgrade for additional parameters
Capacity and Efficiency
Regional Single/Multiple ANSP(s) Controllers Airline and ANSP None
ATC surveillance in non-radar area
ADS-B-NRA All aircraft N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No Yes NoRFG (Fast Track), Air Services Australia
C or B? As good as radarTo provide radar like service
Full equipage CapacityLocal/ Regional
Regulator (mandate) Controllers Airline and ANSP Radar
Lateral Crossing and Passing
ASEP-LC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
ASPA-C&P as a separation application. Addressed lateral case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Vertical Crossing and Passing
ASEP-VC&P All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDAddressed vertical Crossing and Passing case separately
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyLocal/ Regional
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
In-Trail Follow ASEP-ITF All involved Own ship Desirable YesNone Anticipated
Yes TBD No No ASSTAR TBD
Conceptually similar to ASPA-S&M (remain behind) but this application for non-radar areas
Higher integrity than Package 1
CapacityOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
2 or 3 Flight Level Change ASEP-FLC All involved Own ship Desirable Yes ?None Anticipated
No TBD No No ASSTAR TBDConceptually similar to ATSA-ITP but as a separation application
Higher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSP/AirlinePilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Runway Incursion Alerting (airborne)
All aircraft All aircraft YesResolution Advisories
Alerting System and Runway Info
N/A N/A N/A N/AMA-AFAS, NUP II, EMMA, SLATS
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local Airline PilotsAirline and ANSP (unless using TIS-B)
None
Runway Incursion Alerting (ground tool)
All aircraft N/A N/A N/APossible datalink alert to aircraft
Yes YesNot essential if radar
No MA-AFAS, NUP II TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Safety Local ANSPPilots (if datalink alert) and Controllers
Airline and ANSPGround radar and SMGCS
Self separation in an Organised Track System
SSEP-OTS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A ASSTAR TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in segregated Free Flight Airspace
SSEP-FFAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/ANLR, NASA, INTENT, MFF
TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
EfficiencyOceanic/ Remote
ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Self-Separation in Managed Airspace
SSEP-MAS All aircraft All aircraft Yes Yes TBD Yes TBD N/A N/A NASA Langley TBDHigher integrity than Package 1
Efficiency Regional ANSPPilots and Controllers
Airline and ANSP None
Airport(Improve safety and efficiency of low visibility ground operations)
ASAS-TN2, First Workshop, Malmo, 26 to 28 September 2005 Slide 18
Conclusions
• ASAS Clustering proposed:
– Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness
– Airborne Spacing
– Ground Surveillance
– Airborne Separation
– Alerting for Runway Incursion
– Self Separation
• These clusters will be used in ASAS-TN2 WP3 (ASAS Application Maturity)
• The clustering table can also be used as a decision making tool
top related