cibc whistler institutional investor conference 2014
Post on 16-May-2015
534 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
agnicoeagle.com
Building and Managing a Quality Gold Business in a Challenging Price Environment
CIBC Whistler Conference January 2014
David Smith, SVP Finance and CFO
agnicoeagle.com
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The information in this document has been prepared as at January 15, 2014. Certain statements contained in this document constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward looking information under the provisions of Canadian provincial securities laws. When used in this document, the words “anticipate”, “expect”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “will”, “planned”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.
Such statements include without limitation: statements regarding timing and amounts of capital expenditures and other assumptions; estimates of future reserves, resources, mineral production, optimization efforts and sales; estimates of mine life; estimates of future internal rates of return, mining costs, cash costs, minesite costs and other expenses; estimates of future capital expenditures and other cash needs, and expectations as to the funding thereof; statements and information as to the projected development of certain ore deposits, including estimates of exploration, development and production and other capital costs, and estimates of the timing of such exploration, development and production or decisions with respect to such exploration, development and production; estimates of reserves and resources, and statements and information regarding anticipated future exploration; the anticipated timing of events with respect to the Company’s mine sites and statements and information regarding the sufficiency of the Company’s cash resources. Such statements and information reflect the Company’s views as at the date of this document and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Many factors, known and unknown could cause the actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward looking statements and information. Such risks include, but are not limited to: the volatility of prices of gold and other metals; uncertainty of mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and mineral recovery estimates; uncertainty of future production, capital expenditures, and other costs; currency fluctuations; financing of additional capital requirements; cost of exploration and development programs; mining risks; community protests; risks associated with foreign operations; governmental and environmental regulation; the volatility of the Company’s stock price; and risks associated with the Company’s byproduct metal derivative strategies. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors that may affect the Company’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this document, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, as well as the Company’s other filings with the Canadian Securities Administrators and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements and information. Alain Blackburn, a Qualified Person and the Company’s Senior Vice-President, Exploration, reviewed the technical information disclosed herein. For a detailed breakdown of the Company’s reserve and resource position see the February 13, 2013 press release on the Company’s website. That press release also lists the Qualified Persons for each project.
agnicoeagle.com 2
agnicoeagle.com
NOTES TO INVESTORS
Note Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures This document presents estimates of future “total cash cost per ounce”, and “all-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold produced” that are not recognized measures under United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”). This data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. These future estimates are based upon the total cash costs per ounce that the Company expects to incur to mine gold at the applicable sites and do not include production costs attributable to accretion expense and other asset retirement costs, which will vary over time as each project is developed and mined. It is therefore not practicable to reconcile these forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure. A reconciliation of the Company’s total cash cost per ounce to the most comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with US GAAP for the Company’s historical results of operations is set forth in the notes to the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 20-F, for the year ended December 31, 2012, as well as the Company’s other filings with the Canadian Securities Administrators and the SEC. Note Regarding Production Guidance The gold production guidance is based on the Company’s mineral reserves but includes contingencies and assumes metal prices and foreign exchange rates that are different from those used in the reserve estimates. These factors and others mean that the gold production guidance presented in this disclosure does not reconcile exactly with the production models used to support these mineral reserves.
agnicoeagle.com 3
agnicoeagle.com
GOLD PRICE ENVIRONMENT 2013 was a volatile year for gold prices
The gold price averaged $1425/oz in 2013 (with a high of $1694/oz in January and a low of $1192/oz in June)
Investors sold ETF positions and gold shares in favor of US equity investments Physical demand has remained strong, especially in eastern markets China, India, and Central Bank demand roughly equals annual mine supply –
physical gold moving to stronger hands Mine supply could be under pressure; Unlike previous cycles, gold producers
appear to have no safety margin to manage much lower gold prices:
No hedge books No ability to high-grade deposits Few sources of new financing
Gold price likely to remain range bound ($1,150 - $1,400/oz) in the medium term
4
agnicoeagle.com
DEFINING A HIGH QUALITY GOLD EQUITY
Investor Requirements:
Producers with solid, achievable growth
Ability to deliver on guidance
Low Cost Structure with ability to deliver margin expansion
Low political risk
Experienced management with consistent, focused strategy
Return of capital (Yield)
5
Agnico Eagle
Manageable business
agnicoeagle.com 6
Source: Bloomberg
-26%
-15%
-13%
-12%
-12%
-11%
-9%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
5%
-30% -20% -10% 0% 10%
IAMGOLD
Newmont
Randgold
Yamana
Goldcorp
Eldorado
Average
Kinross
Osisko
Centerra
Barrick
Agnico
Q4 Performance
-70%
-55%
-54%
-52%
-51%
-50%
-49%
-47%
-46%
-43%
-38%
-38%
-80% -60% -40% -20% 0%
IAMGOLD
Centerra
Eldorado
Kinross
Newmont
Barrick
Average
Agnico
Yamana
Osisko
Randgold
Goldcorp
1 Year Performance
AEM Stock Performance in 2014 A challenging year, but strong Q3 results lifted the stock through year-end
agnicoeagle.com
AEM – DELIVERING RESULTS IN A CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT
► Record Q3’13 gold production of 315,828 oz at a total cash cost of $591/oz
► 2013 Production guidance increased to approximately 1,060,000 oz of gold
► 2013 Total cash cost guidance reduced to approximately $690/oz
► 2013 all-in sustaining cost estimate is reduced to $1,025/oz (from $1,100/oz)
► Improved cash flow generation for 2013 and 2014 expected through cost savings and increased production guidance – potential total impact approximately $400 million
► Goldex and La India contributing to ~20% production growth through 2015
7
agnicoeagle.com
AEM – MANAGEABLE, SOLID BUSINESS Full year 2013 production revised higher to 1,060,000 moz gold
YTD 2013 EXPECTED
PRODUCTION1
Production Total
Cash Cost 2014 2015 (Gold oz) ($/oz) (Gold oz) (Gold oz) LaRonde 130,445 $801 215,000 250,000
Goldex 1,505 N/A 49,000 85,000
Kittila 104,711 $564 165,000 160,000
Lapa 74,407 $687 96,000 65,000
Meadowbank 307,180 $828 367,000 350,000
Northern Business 618,248 $760 892,000 910,000 Pinos Altos 135,283 $402 136,000 161,000
Creston Mascota 23,361 $511 52,000 55,000
La India 40,000 81,000
Southern Business 158,644 $428 228,000 297,000
AEM Total 776,892 $692 1,120,000 1,207,000
1.As per Feb 14, 2013 press release.
CANADA 62%
FINLAND 13%
MEXICO 25%
Agnico Eagle 2015E Production Profile By Country
8
agnicoeagle.com
Production weighted Fraser institute Policy Potential Index scores by company (2012-2015)
LOW POLITICAL RISK, MINING FRIENDLY JURISDICTIONS
Source: Fraser Institute, Barclays, Absa and company data
Operating in low political risk theatres helps create a manageable business
9
agnicoeagle.com
FINANCIAL POSITION Adequate cash balance with financial flexibility
Long-Term Debt Maturities
2017 2020 2022 2024
Notes Outstanding (millions) $115 $360 $225 $100
Coupon 6.13% 6.67% 5.93% 5.02%
ALL AMOUNTS ARE IN US$, (unless otherwise indicated) Sep. 30, 2013
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (millions) $142
LONG TERM DEBT (millions) $950
AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES $1.05 Billion
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC (Q3’13 Weighted average, millions) 173.1
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING, FULLY DILUTED (Q3’13 Weighted average, millions) 173.5
10
agnicoeagle.com
MODERATE, ACHIEVABLE PRODUCTION GROWTH Low political risk, mining-friendly jurisdictions
900,000
950,000
1,000,000
1,050,000
1,100,000
1,150,000
1,200,000
1,250,000
2010A 2011A 2012A 2013E 2014E 2015E
Actual Estimate
Payable Gold Production Profile (oz)
11
agnicoeagle.com
PROJECTED CAPITAL SPENDING
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013E 2014E
Actual Estimate
Capital Expenditures (US$ 000’s)
12
agnicoeagle.com
SOUTHERN BUSINESS
agnicoeagle.com
Skilled workforce, excellent mineral potential, and a well respected mining industry
Mining is the fourth largest sector in the Mexico economy
AEM operations are in two of the top gold producing northern states of Chihuahua and Sonora
Capital Investment in Mexican Mining Industry (US$M)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Sonora
Zacatecas
Chihuahua
Guerrero
Durango
SLP
Oxaca
Other
2012 Gold Production by State (koz)
Source: Camimex Annual Report 2012.
$2,858 $3,310
$5,612
$8,043
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
2009 2010 2011 2012Years
MEXICO – WORLD CLASS MINING JURISDICTION
14
agnicoeagle.com
AGNICO EAGLE MEXICO - LARGE LAND POSITIONS
15
agnicoeagle.com
Pinos Altos was acquired in 2006 for $80 million; Began operations in Q4 2009
Creston Mascota was developed as a satellite project to Pinos Altos in 2011
Pinos Altos is now the 3rd largest gold producer in Mexico and is one of AEM’s biggest cash flow generators (~$800 million in cumulative operating cash flow)
With an estimated 17 year LOM, and several potential satellite targets, Pinos Altos should remain a key cash flow contributor
The company acquired the La India project in November 2011; Commissioning and first gold pour less than two years after acquisition
1500 AEM employees in Mexico have a proven track record and are well positioned to continue delivering shareholder returns and future growth
AEM SUCCESS IN MEXICO Solid operations, Steady growth and Exploration upside
16
agnicoeagle.com
Cubiro
Creston Mascota
Bravo
Sinter
Reyna de Plata
San Eligio
Santo Nino
El Apache
Oberon de Weber
2.5 km
Cerro Colorado
PINOS ALTOS & CRESTON MASCOTA Future development potential at various satellite zones
17
agnicoeagle.com
PINOS ALTOS & CRESTON MASCOTA - Gold & Silver Production Trends
10,8
23 26
,228
25,6
19
35,2
48
39,9
55
43,4
40
51,0
66
52,7
39
52,5
74
57,0
16
63,3
56
61,9
73
52,4
92
46,0
71 57
,530
55,0
43
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Q4 09 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11 Q1 12 Q2 12 Q3 12 Q4 12 Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13
Quarterly Payable Au Oz Production
90,0
00 22
2,00
0
225,
000
290,
000 42
8,00
0
406,
000
452,
000
485,
000
508,
000
507,
000
537,
000
639,
000
628,
000
616,
000
619,
000
614,
000
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Q4 09 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11 Q1 12 Q2 12 Q3 12 Q4 12 Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13
Quarterly Payable Ag Oz Production
18
agnicoeagle.com
PINOS ALTOS & CRESTON MASCOTA Stable Production Expenses Over the Past 2.5 Years
19
39.0 40.1
36.5 35.1
40.8
36.9
40.0
34.7
38.9
35.4
-
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
Q2
2011
Q3
2011
Q4
2011
Q1
2012
Q2
2012
Q3
2012
Q4
2012
Q1
2013
Q2
2013
Q3
2013
Production Expenses by Quarter- Pinos Altos and Creston Mascota
agnicoeagle.com
LA INDIA Commercial production expected in Q1 2014
20
• Leaching commenced in Q4 2013, with the first gold pour in November
• Gold production expected to average approximately 90 koz/yr @ average total cash costs of approximately $500/oz
• Project ahead of schedule and on budget -$157.6 million
• Commissioning began 22 months after acquisition
• Low technical risk
• Metallurgical testing of La India sulphides and Tarachi mineralization continues
agnicoeagle.com
NORTHERN BUSINESS
agnicoeagle.com
CANADA - QUEBEC Established, experienced business with upside potential
LaRonde – Agnico Eagle’s flagship mine, operating for 25 years with 14 years of remaining mine life
Commissioning of cooling plant underway
Gold production expected to expand to over 300,000 oz in 2015-2018; Driven by significant increases in expected gold grade
Lapa – Steady operation demonstrates effective cost control
Potential to expand mine life past 2015 through Zulapa extension
Goldex – Commercial production achieved in Q4’13
Expected to add approximately 90,000 oz annually to the Company’s production profile
Technical studies continue on other satellite zones; Could provide meaningful extension to the mine life
22
agnicoeagle.com
CANADA - NUNAVUT Record quarterly gold production at Meadowbank
Meadowbank - Record quarterly production – 133 koz at $623 cash costs
Excellent cost control due to improved productivity and cost reduction initiatives
Grades forecast to remain strong through the first half of 2014
Meliadine - Project has possibility to be the Company’s largest producing asset
2014 capital expenditures reduced by $80 million to $45 million
Program will focus on ramp development and exploration drilling
Updated technical study on track for H2 2014
Encouraging exploration results from Tiriganiaq, Normeg, Pump South, and F Zones
23
agnicoeagle.com
FINLAND – KITTILA Production positively impacted by high-grade pit pillar
Better SAG mill performance and simplified autoclave operation following the Q2 2013 relining
Record 3Q’13 gold production on increased throughput, and recoveries
750 tpd mill expansion remains on budget and schedule
Remains Agnico Eagle’s largest reserve asset, with significant exploration and expansion potential
P&P GOLD RESERVES (million oz) 4.8
AVERAGE GOLD RESERVE GRADE (g/t) 4.5
Indicated resource (million oz) (7.8 M tonnes @ 2.65 g/t) 0.7
Inferred resource (million oz) (19.0 M tonnes @ 3.88 g/t) 2.4
Estimated LOM (years) 25
See AEM Feb 13, 2013 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources.
24
agnicoeagle.com
Why Agnico Eagle? ► Delivering on production - strong operating performance expected to
continue into 2014
► Funded production growth - expecting ~20% growth from 2013 to 2015 ► Experienced management team with historical perspective
– CEO Sean Boyd has been with the company for 28 years
► Diversified technical expertise – deep UG, open pit, high arctic, and autoclave operations
► Mines in stable, low political risk jurisdictions
► Balance sheet flexibility
► 31 years of consecutive dividend payments
► Consistent acquisition strategy – small scale, early stage investments with exploration upside
25
agnicoeagle.com
APPENDIX
agnicoeagle.com
15-Year Indexed Share Performance
0%
500%
1000%
1500%
2000%
02/01/1998 19/05/2000 11/10/2002 02/03/2005 20/07/2007 04/12/2009 24/04/2012
AEM US Equity
XAU Index
Gold Spot
AEM - US XAU Index Gold Spot Start Date 2/6/1998 Start Date 2/6/1998 Start Date 2/6/1998 End Date 12/31/2013 End Date 12/31/2013 End Date 12/31/2013 Start Price $6.19 Start Price $76.18 Start Price $298.15 Final Price $26.79 Final Price $85.77 Final Price $1,225.99 CAGR 10.37% CAGR 0.69% CAGR 9.33%
Source: Bloomberg
27
agnicoeagle.com
COST EFFECTIVE EXPLORATION REFLECTS SUCCESSFUL M&A STRATEGY Significant exploration results at acquired properties
0
3,000
6,000
9,000Ki
ttila
'05
Kitt
ila '1
2
Pino
sAl
tos '
06
Pino
sAl
tos '
12
Mea
dow
bank
'07
Mea
dow
bank
'12
Mel
iadi
ne'1
0
Mel
iadi
ne'1
2
La In
dia
'11
La In
dia
'12
Mined
Proven &ProbableMeasured &IndicatedInferred
+1105 koz
+5644 koz
+3161 koz
+3085 koz
+1097 koz
$54 $43
$173
$121
$186
$18 $27 $48
$26 $10
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
Kittila Pinos Altos Meadowbank Meliadine La India
Purchase Cost per OzDiscovery Cost per Oz
Note: The terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” and “inferred resources” are not recognized under the SEC guidelines. Detailed information can be found in the February 13, 2013 press release.
28
agnicoeagle.com
GOLD AND SILVER RESERVES AND RESOURCES December 31, 2012
Gold
Tonnes (000’s)
Gold (g/t)
Gold (ounces)
(000’s)
Proven 13,836 3.13 1,394
Probable 170,300 3.16 17,286
Total Reserves 184,136 3.16 18,681
Measured & Indicated 140,995 1.79 8,104
Inferred 199,503 1.90 12,159
Silver
Tonnes (000’s)
Silver
(g/t)
Silver (ounces)
(000’s)
Proven 9,390 47.30 14,281
Probable 57,536 43.93 81,256
Total Reserves 66,926 44.40 95,537
Measured & Indicated 23,379 31.95 24,015
Inferred 36,479 20.66 24,228
See AEM Feb 13, 2013 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources. Reserves are not a subset of resources.
29
agnicoeagle.com
COPPER, ZINC AND LEAD RESERVES AND RESOURCES December 31, 2012
See AEM Feb 13, 2013 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources. Reserves are not a subset of resources.
Copper Tonnes (000’s)
Copper (%)
Copper (tonnes)
Proven 6,323 0.30 18,744
Probable 22,462 0.24 53,835
Total Reserves 28,786 0.25 72,580
Indicated 5,432 0.12 6,644
Inferred 11,887 0.25 29,317
Zinc Tonnes (000’s)
Zinc (%)
Zinc (tonnes)
Proven 6,323 1.06 67,211
Probable 22,462 0.68 152,973
Total Reserves 28,786 0.76 220,184
Indicated 5,432 1.50 81,551
Inferred 11,887 0.58 69,048
Lead Tonnes (000’s)
Lead (%)
Lead (tonnes)
Proven 6,323 0.12 7,738
Probable 22,462 0.05 10,304
Total Reserves 28,786 0.06 18,042
Indicated 5,432 0.15 8,071
Inferred 11,887 0.05 5,375
30
agnicoeagle.com
NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES
Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources This document uses the terms “measured resources” and “indicated resources”. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Resources This document also uses the term “inferred resources”. We advise investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it. “Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable. Scientific and Technical Data Agnico Eagle Mines Limited is reporting mineral resource and reserve estimates in accordance with the CIM guidelines for the estimation, classification and reporting of resources and reserves. Cautionary Note To U.S. Investors – The SEC permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. Agnico Eagle uses certain terms in this press release, such as “measured”, “indicated”, and “inferred”, and “resources” that the SEC guidelines strictly prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, which may be obtained from us, or from the SEC’s website at: http://sec.gov/edgar.shtml. A “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to meet the requirements to designate reserves under Industry Guide 7. Estimates for all properties were calculated using historic three-year average metals prices and foreign exchange rates in accordance with the SEC Industry Guide 7. Industry Guide 7 requires the use of prices that reflect current economic conditions at the time of reserve determination, which the Staff of the SEC has interpreted to mean historic three-year average prices. The assumptions used for the mineral reserves and resources estimates at the Lapa, Meadowbank and Creston Mascota mines and the Goldex and Meliadine projects reported by the Company on February 13, 2013 are based on three-year average prices for the period ending December 31, 2012 of $1,490 per ounce gold, $29.00 per ounce silver, $0.95 per pound zinc, $3.67 per pound copper, $1.00 per pound lead and C$/US$, US$/Euro and MXP/US$ exchange rates of 1.00, 1.34 and 12.75, respectively. The assumptions used for the mineral reserves and resources estimates at the LaRonde, Pinos Altos and Kittila mines and the La India and Tarachi projects reported by the Company on February 13, 2013 were based on three-year average prices for the period ending June 30, 2012 of $1,345 per ounce gold, $25.00 per ounce silver, $0.95 per pound zinc, $3.49 per pound copper, $0.99 per pound lead and C$/US$, US$/Euro and MXP/US$ exchange rates of 1.00, 1.30 and 13.00, respectively. The Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) requires mining companies to disclose reserves and resources using the subcategories of “proven” reserves, “probable” reserves, “measured” resources, “indicated” resources and “inferred” resources. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
agnicoeagle.com 31
agnicoeagle.com
NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES
A mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A mineral reserve includes diluting materials and allows for losses that may occur when the material is mined. A proven mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. A probable mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of an indicated, and in some circumstances, a measured mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. A mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals in or on the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. A measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity. An indicated mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed. An inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable. A Feasibility Study is a comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project that includes appropriately detailed assessments of realistically assumed mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental considerations together with any other relevant operational factors and detailed financial analysis, that are necessary to demonstrate at the time of reporting that extraction is reasonably justified (economically mineable). The results of the study may reasonably serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of the project. The confidence level of the study will be higher than that of a Pre-Feasibility Study. The effective date for all of the Company’s mineral resource and reserve estimates in this presentation is December 31, 2012. Additional information about each of the mineral projects that is required by NI 43-101, sections 3.2 and 3.3 and paragraphs 3.4 (a), (c) and (d) can be found in the Technical Reports referred to above, which may be found at www.sedar.com. Other important operating information can be found in the Company’s Form 20-F and this news release dated February 13, 2013. Alain Blackburn, a Qualified Person and the Company’s Senior Vice-President, Exploration, reviewed the technical information disclosed herein.
agnicoeagle.com 32
agnicoeagle.com
agnicoeagle.com
Trading Symbol: AEM on TSX & NYSE
Investor Relations: 416-847-8665 info@agnicoeagle.com
top related