binp tau-charm project

1

BINP Tau-Charm Project

3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba

E.Levichev

For the BINP C-Tau team

2

Outline

1. Introduction of Crab Waist collision approach2. Scientific program and specifications3. Optics4. FF and QD05. Polarization insertions6. Energy calibration

3

Crabbed waist is realized with a sextupole inphase with the I P in X and at / 2 in Y

2z

2x

z

x

2x/

2z*

e-e+Y

1. Large Piwinski’s angle = tg(z/x

2. Vertical beta comparable with overlap area y x/

3. Crab waist transformation y = xy’/(2)

Crab Waist in 3 Steps

1. P.Raimondi, 2° SuperB Workshop, March 2006

2. P.Raimondi, D.Shatilov, M.Zobov, physics/0702033

M.Zobov, Tau08, Novosibirsk

4

x

y 2

x

y 2

Crabbed Waist Scheme

x

x

yy

K

*

*

1

2

1

Sextupole (Anti)sextupole

20 2

1yxpHH

Sextupole strength Equivalent Hamiltonian

IPyx , yx ,** ,

yx

*

2* /

yyy

xs

M.Zobov, Tau08, Novosibirsk

5

Collisions with and without Crab Sextupoles

1. Bigger blowup

2. Sharp lifetime reduction for bunch currents > 8 -10 mA

February

2009

Courtesy G. Mazzitelli

6

Frequency Map Analysis for CW

7

Scientific case for the BINP C-tau project

► D-Dbar mixing► CP violation searches in charm decays► Rare and forbidden charm decays► Standard Model tests in leptons decays► Searches for lepton flavor violation →► CP/T violation searches in leptons decays► Production of the polarized anti-nucleons E = 1 GeV (may be with reduced luminosity)

Requirements: L > 1034 cm-2 s-1, longitudinal polarization, beam energy range from 1 GeV to 2.5 GeV

8

Specifications

► Variable energy Ecm= 2 – 5 GeV

► Luminosity L = 1÷2×1035 cm-2s-1

► Electrons are polarized longitudinally at IP

► No energy asymmetry

► No beam monochromatization

► Energy calibration with medium accuracy

is sufficient (Compton backscattering)

9

Facility key features and principles

► Two rings with a single interaction point► Crab waist collision► SC wigglers to keep the same damping and emittance in the whole energy range (optimal luminosity)► Polarized e- injector and spin control to get the longitudinally polarized electron beam at IP► Wide re-using of the existing structures and facilities tosave the cost

10

Layout

Injection facility exists

Tunnel for the linac and the technical straight section of the factory is ready

11

Main ring

12

Main ring: tunnelReady-built tunnel FF region

Technical reg. (RF and injection)

Damping wiggler sections

13

Main accelerator parameters

6 m of the SC wigglers with 20-cm-period are used to control the beam parameters at different energies

Energy 1.0 GeV 1.5 GeV 2.0 GeV 2.5 GeV

Circumference 783 m

Emittance hor/ver 10 nm/0.05 nm @ 0.5% coupling

Damping time hor/ver/long 30/30/15 ms

Bunch length 20 mm 13 mm 10 mm 10 mm

Energy spread 10.5·10-4 10.4·10-4 8.8·10-4 7.6·10-4

Energy loss/turn 174 keV 261 keV 349 keV 430 keV

Momentum compaction 1.00·10-3 1.06·10-3 1.06·10-3 1.06·10-3

Synchrotron tune 0.013 0.014 0.012 0.010

Wiggler field 5.4 T 4.0 T 2.8 T 0

RF frequency 500 MHz

Harmonic number 1260

Particles/bunch 7·1010

Number of bunches 294

Bunch current 4.3 mA

Total beam current 1.3 A

Beam-beam parameter 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.12

Luminosity 0.55·1035 0.81·1035 1.08·1035 1.08·1035

14

Main ring: arc cellFODO but close to the theoretical minimum emittance

x, y

15

Main ring: injection section

x, y

16

IR optics

L1/2 = 75 m

x, y

IP

FF telescope

Y Section of chroms correction

X Section of chroms correction

Crab Sext

End of the telescope

17

Luminosity D.Shatilov

0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

Crab ON: ξy=0.13

Lbeam=2.76·1032 @ Np=7·1010

Lmax=1.05·1035 @ Nb=380

Crab OFF: ξy=0.06

Lbeam=4.94·1031 @ Np=3·1010

Lmax=0.44·1035 @ Nb=890

y=750 um, Θ=50, mrad, σz=1cm, x=10 nm·rad, 0.5% coupling

18

Polarization scheme

IP

snake1

snake2 snake3

dampingwiggler1

dampingwiggler2

Polarization scheme with 3 snakes (arc=1200

+2 damping wigglers in the arc’s middle )

19

Polarization vs energy

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.60

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Beam Energy, GeV

Po

lari

zati

on

Deg

ree

5 snakes

1 snake

3 snakes

20

QD0

SC iron yoke twin aperture magnet Excitation current 1150 ASingle aperture 2 cmGradient 150 T/m

21

Damping wigglers

Field amplitude at 1.0 GeV 5.4 T

Period length 0.2 m

Total length 8 m

Damping integral i2 at 1.0 GeV 12.4 m-1

Excitation integral i5 at 1.0 GeV 0.08 m-1

The damping wigglers keep the damping time x =30 ms and thehorizontal emittance (εx=10 nm) in the energy range 1.0 – 2.5 GeV

Wiggler field amplitude vs energy

Wiggler with similar parameters produced by BINP

22

Energy calibration

Compton backscattering Ecalibration (~10-410-5)

Spectrum edge 5105 E

E

Na24 (1)=1368.625 keV Na24 (2)=2754.008 keV

Na24 (1+2)=4122.633 keV

23

Injection facility

24

Injection facility upgrade

• Today:• 21010 e-/pulse (1.5% conversion) 3 108

e+/pulse 50 Hz = 1.51010 e+/s

• Upgrade:• e- current increase ( 3)• Better focusing in positron linac ( 1.5)• Debuncher usage ( 2)• = 1.351011 e+/s

• Reserve: electron energy can be increased by 100 MeV ( 1.3)

25

Summary

► Crab Waist collision seems a very promising idea to enhance a circular colliders luminosity beyond the present value by factor of 10-100 without current increase.

► CW approach was successfully proved experimentally at DAFNE in the end of 2008

► Novosibirsk SuperCT project is under way. The key issues like IR design, DA optimization, polarization scheme, QD0 design, etc. seem solved successfully

► In 2010 we hope to finish a CDR and in parallel apply for funding to Russian Government.