asian development bank - world bankpubdocs.worldbank.org/en/713791574195166712/pdf/icp-tag04-s2...

Post on 06-Jun-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Approach to Comparisons of Housing Expenditures - 2017 ICP in Asia and the Pacific

A Linked Rental and Volume Approach with Additional Quality Adjustments

Asian Development BankKaushal Joshi

4th Meeting of the ICP Technical Advisory Group

October 28-29, 2019, Washington, DC

2

▪ Background: Concerns in Asia and the Pacific

▪ ICP 2011 approach

▪ ICP 2017 approach: ADB Approach

▪ TAG asks: Issues and concerns

Content

3

Background

4

Concerns in Asia and the Pacific

▪ Lack of representative/functional rental markets in

many countries

▪ Share of rented dwellings in more than half of the

economies is below 20%

▪ Heterogeneity in the composition of the participating

economies

▪ Low to high income

▪ Low to high population

▪ Fully urban to largely rural

5

ICP 2011 Approach

6

ICP 2011 Approach

▪ Both direct rent and direct volume approaches were

attempted in 2011 ICP

▪ Lack of rental data for some countries

▪ Gaps in Volume data, too many imputations and ‘gap-filling’

▪ Data of uncertain quality, which are often incomparable,

▪ Quality differences across countries not adequately captured

by the indicators used

▪ Implausible results from both approaches

▪ Weaknesses in capturing housing expenditures especially for

owner-occupied dwellings in national accounts in the GDP

▪ Conclusion:

▪ Reference Volume Approach

▪ Relative volumes of housing services between

economies are equal to the relative volume of

household expenditures (excluding rents)

7

ICP 2017 Approach

8

ICP 2017 Approach

▪ Again, both direct rent and direct volume

approaches were attempted in 2017 ICP

▪ Efforts to collect complete data, minimize data

gaps/gap filling, rigorous data validation,

▪Not all countries could provide nationally

representative rentals surveys

▪Results however, suggest that the PPPs, PLIs and

relative levels of per capita housing again from the

two approaches are implausible for many countries

▪Both the approaches independently fail to

adequately account for the differences in the quality

of dwellings

9

Proposed Housing Approach (1)

Select Reliable

PPPs from

Direct Quantity

Approach

Rental DataQuantity Data

+ Quality Indicators

Rental PPPs

Real Expenditures

Housing Volumes

Implied Housing PPPs

Quality Adjustment Using Relative

Per Capita Expenditure

PPPadj = PPP x sqrt(Real PCHK/Real

PCcountry)

Quality Adjustment using Urbanization

rates

PPPadj = PPP x (Urb. Rate HK/Urb.

Rate country)

Select Reliable

PPPs from

Rental Approach

Compute Linking

Factor

Combined Housing PPPs and Real Expenditures

The New ADB Approach to Housing Comparisons

10

Proposed Housing Approach (2)

Steps on Linking

Step 1: Identify good and reliable rental PPPs and indirect PPPs from

direct quantity approach

Step 2: Identify economies for linking/filling gaps in PPPs

Step 3: Convert rental PPPs to estimate Volume PPPs and vice versa

for countries with PPPs available from only one approach using the

linking factor – thus all countries will have PPPs from rental and

volume approaches

Step 4: Final PPs are calculated as the geometric mean of the two

sets of rental and volume-based PPPs

11

Issues and concerns

▪ Adjustments (i.e., full or partial)

▪ Selecting link economies

▪ Sustainability of the method

THANK YOU

12

top related