appraisal assignment format: appraisal report docs/appraisal lot 3...appraisal assignment format:...
Post on 11-Jun-2020
27 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Rel
ian
t
9330 Vanguard Drive, Suite 201
Anchorage, Alaska 99507
Phone: (907) 929-2226
Fax: (907) 929-2260
Email: admin@reliantadvisory.com
www.reliantadvisory.com
Appraisal Assignment
Format: Appraisal Report
Former Fairview Substation
NSA E. 12th Avenue
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Latitude: 61°12'37.53'N, Longitude: 149°52'11.63'W
Client Reference Number: NTP 2011RED183
Reliant Reference Number: 16-0380
as of May 3, 2016
Prepared For:
Ms. Tawny Klebesadel MOA Real Estate Department / Heritage Land Bank
16-0380 Letter of Transmittal Page i
9330 Vanguard Drive, Suite 201
Anchorage, Alaska 99507
Phone: (907) 929-2226
Fax: (907) 929-2260
Email: admin@reliantadvisory.com www.reliantadvisory.com
Letter of Transmittal
May 4, 2016
Ms. Tawny Klebesadel
Office Manager
MOA Real Estate Department / Heritage Land Bank
4700 Elmore Road, 2nd Flr
Anchorage, Alaska 99507
RE: Former Fairview Substation
NSA E. 12th Avenue
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Client Reference Number: NTP 2011RED183
Reliant Reference Number: 16-0380
Dear Ms. Klebesadel:
At your request, an appraisal of the above referenced property has been prepared. The results of the
assignment are presented in Appraisal Report format. Note that the Client has requested a summary format (as
defined in USPAP prior to the 2014-2015 edition), and this report is intended to meet the Client’s requirements
in this regard. The purpose of the assignment is to estimate the market rent of the Fee Simple interest in the
subject real estate in its current As Is condition.
The report will be used by MOA Real Estate Department / Heritage Land Bank (the Client) for internal
decisions, asset management, and possible lease offering and it may not be suitable for other uses. Although
other parties may in some cases obtain a copy of this report, it should not be relied upon by anyone outside of
the intended user(s).
This assignment has been prepared and presented in conformance with the client’s instructions, the current
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as promulgated by the Appraisal Standards
Board of the Appraisal Foundation, as well as the bylaws of the Appraisal Institute.
The subject is a single, vacant lot which has been used in recent years as parking to support a nearby property.
The subject's exterior has been observed, and photographs taken. Market information and data regarding other
similar real estate has been obtained. This data has been analyzed using appropriate techniques and
methodologies necessary to develop a credible and reliable estimate of market rent.
Let
ter
of
Tra
nsm
itta
l
9330 Vanguard Drive, Suite 201
Anchorage, AK 99507
Phone: (907) 929-2226
Fax: (907) 929-2260
Email: admin@reliantadvisory.com
www.reliantadvisory.com
RE: Former Fairview Substation
16-0380 Letter of Transmittal Page ii
As a result of research and analysis, the value estimates for the subject are as follows:
FINAL MARKET RENT ESTIMATE
Former Fairview Substation
Property Rights Fee Simple
Condition As Is
Effective Date of Appraisal May 3, 2016
Lease Area Size 6,580 Sq Ft
Rent Escalations Mkt. Adj. / 5Yrs
Tenant Expenses NNN
Final Market Rent Estimate $6,900/Yr.
The value estimates are based on a marketing period of approximately 12 months and an exposure period of
approximately 12 months. The value opinion reported above is qualified by certain assumptions, limiting
conditions, certifications and definitions, which are set forth in the body of the report. This letter is invalid as
an opinion of value if detached from the report, which contains the text, exhibits and Addendum. Thank you
for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Respectfully submitted,
Theodore Jensen, MAI Managing Member
Alaska Certified General - No. 545
Appraisal Institute Member No. 482231
ted@reliantadvisory.com
Former Fairview Substation Certification
16-0380
Page iii
Certification
The undersigned certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief:
1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and
limiting conditions, and are their personal, impartial and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and
conclusions.
3. They have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no
personal interest with respect to the parties involved.
4. They have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved
with this assignment.
5. They have not provided a previous service, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the subject
within the three years prior to accepting this assignment.
6. Engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon their developing or reporting predetermined
results.
7. Compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a
predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value
opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to
the intended use of this appraisal.
8. Analysis, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with
the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.
9. A personal walk-through of the subject property has been made by Mr. Jensen.
10. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the persons signing this certification and
they are competent and qualified to perform the appraisal assignment.
11. The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in
conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute.
12. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its
duly authorized representatives.
13. As of the date of this report, Theodore Jensen has completed the requirements of the continuing education
program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute, and for certified appraisers in the State of
Alaska.
Cer
tifi
cati
on
Theodore Jensen, MAI
Alaska Certified General No. 545
Former Fairview Substation Table Of Contents
16-0380
Page v
Table of Contents
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL .................................................................................................................................. I
CERTIFICATION.................................................................................................................................................... III
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................... V
ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................ - 1 -
IDENTITY OF PROPERTY ........................................................................................................................................ - 1 - Name ............................................................................................................................................................... - 1 - Brief Description ............................................................................................................................................. - 1 - Address ............................................................................................................................................................ - 1 - Geo Coordinates ............................................................................................................................................. - 1 - Physical Location ............................................................................................................................................ - 1 - Assessor’s Tax Parcel Number(s) ................................................................................................................... - 1 - Abbreviated Legal Description ....................................................................................................................... - 1 - Current Use ..................................................................................................................................................... - 1 - Appraised Use ................................................................................................................................................. - 1 - Highest and Best Use ...................................................................................................................................... - 1 -
SCOPE OF ASSIGNMENT ........................................................................................................................................ - 1 - Value Definition(s) .......................................................................................................................................... - 1 - Other Definitions............................................................................................................................................. - 2 - Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... - 2 - Intended Use of Appraisal ............................................................................................................................... - 2 - Intended User(s) of Appraisal ......................................................................................................................... - 2 - Property Interest Appraised ............................................................................................................................ - 2 - Property Rights Appraised .............................................................................................................................. - 2 - Report Presentation ........................................................................................................................................ - 2 - Inspection Date ............................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Effective Date .................................................................................................................................................. - 3 - Report Date ..................................................................................................................................................... - 3 -
SCOPE OF WORK ................................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Overview ......................................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Limitations to Scope of Work .......................................................................................................................... - 3 - Compliance ..................................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Assignment Presentation ................................................................................................................................. - 3 - Subject Walk Through ..................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Information Provided to Appraiser for Consideration .................................................................................... - 4 - Market Analysis............................................................................................................................................... - 4 - Approaches to Value ....................................................................................................................................... - 4 - Valuation Process ........................................................................................................................................... - 4 -
OWNERSHIP AND SALES INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ - 5 - Current Owner of Record................................................................................................................................ - 5 - Three Year Transaction History ...................................................................................................................... - 5 -
EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITING CONDITIONS & SPECIAL RISK FACTORS .......................................... - 5 - HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................ - 6 - COMPETENCY OF APPRAISER ................................................................................................................................ - 6 -
AREA DATA .......................................................................................................................................................... - 7 -
REGIONAL AREA DATA ........................................................................................................................................ - 7 - LOCAL AREA DATA .............................................................................................................................................. - 9 - DEMOGRAPHIC DATA EXHIBIT ........................................................................................................................... - 12 -
Tab
le o
f C
on
ten
ts
Former Fairview Substation Table Of Contents
16-0380
Page vi
NEIGHBORHOOD DATA ....................................................................................................................................... - 13 - Name ............................................................................................................................................................. - 13 - Location & Access ........................................................................................................................................ - 13 - Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... - 13 - Character & Land Uses ................................................................................................................................ - 13 - Typical Age of Improvements ........................................................................................................................ - 13 - Percent Land Developed ............................................................................................................................... - 13 - Life Cycle ...................................................................................................................................................... - 13 - New Construction .......................................................................................................................................... - 13 - Trends ........................................................................................................................................................... - 14 -
CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................................... - 14 - Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................... - 14 -
IMPACT OF LOW OIL PRICES ............................................................................................................................ - 15 - Current Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... - 15 -
IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH .......................................................................................... - 16 - IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOGRAPHS ..................................................................................................... - 17 -
DESCRIPTION OF SITE .................................................................................................................................... - 19 -
DESCRIPTION OF SITE ......................................................................................................................................... - 19 - Name ............................................................................................................................................................. - 19 - Address .......................................................................................................................................................... - 19 - Geo Coordinates ........................................................................................................................................... - 19 - Physical Location .......................................................................................................................................... - 19 - Assessor’s Tax Parcel Number(s) ................................................................................................................. - 19 - Abbreviated Legal Description ..................................................................................................................... - 19 - Gross Site Area ............................................................................................................................................. - 19 - Shape ............................................................................................................................................................. - 19 - Street Frontage ............................................................................................................................................. - 19 - Access ............................................................................................................................................................ - 19 - Exposure ....................................................................................................................................................... - 19 - Adjacent Land Uses / Businesses .................................................................................................................. - 19 - Topography ................................................................................................................................................... - 20 - Soil Conditions .............................................................................................................................................. - 20 - Wetlands ........................................................................................................................................................ - 20 - Hazardous Conditions ................................................................................................................................... - 20 - Flood Zone .................................................................................................................................................... - 20 - Earthquake Zone ........................................................................................................................................... - 20 - Utilities .......................................................................................................................................................... - 20 -
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH EXHIBIT .......................................................................................................................... - 21 - GRID MAP EXHIBIT............................................................................................................................................. - 22 -
Zoning ........................................................................................................................................................... - 23 - Easements, Covenants, Encroachments & Restrictions ................................................................................ - 24 - Site Improvements ......................................................................................................................................... - 24 - Functional Utility .......................................................................................................................................... - 24 -
PROPERTY ASSESSMENT & TAXES ............................................................................................................ - 25 -
SUMMARY OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT & TAXES ............................................................................................... - 25 - Real Property ................................................................................................................................................ - 25 -
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS .............................................................................................................................. - 27 -
HIGHEST & BEST USE ..................................................................................................................................... - 29 -
DEFINITION & METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... - 29 - Scope of Highest & Best Use ........................................................................................................................ - 29 -
Former Fairview Substation Table Of Contents
16-0380
Page vii
AS VACANT ........................................................................................................................................................ - 29 - Legally Permissible ....................................................................................................................................... - 29 - Physically Possible ....................................................................................................................................... - 29 - Financially Feasible ..................................................................................................................................... - 29 - Maximally Productive ................................................................................................................................... - 29 -
PROBABLE BUYER .............................................................................................................................................. - 30 -
LAND VALUATION ........................................................................................................................................... - 31 -
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... - 31 - Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. - 31 - Units of Comparison ..................................................................................................................................... - 31 -
COMPARABLE DATA ........................................................................................................................................... - 31 - Sources of Data ............................................................................................................................................. - 31 - Availability of Data ....................................................................................................................................... - 31 - Presentation of Data ..................................................................................................................................... - 31 -
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES EXHIBIT ........................................................................................... - 32 - MAP OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES EXHIBIT ..................................................................................................... - 33 - DESCRIPTION OF DATA ....................................................................................................................................... - 34 -
Sale No. L-1 .................................................................................................................................................. - 34 - Sale No. L-2 .................................................................................................................................................. - 35 - Sale No. L-3 .................................................................................................................................................. - 36 - Sale No. L-4 .................................................................................................................................................. - 36 - Sale No. L-5 .................................................................................................................................................. - 37 - Sale No. L-6 .................................................................................................................................................. - 38 - Sale No. L-7 .................................................................................................................................................. - 39 -
OVERVIEW OF ADJUSTMENTS ............................................................................................................................. - 39 - Nature of Adjustments ................................................................................................................................... - 39 - Usable Land Area ......................................................................................................................................... - 39 - Property Rights Conveyed ............................................................................................................................. - 39 - Financing Terms ........................................................................................................................................... - 40 - Conditions of Sale ......................................................................................................................................... - 40 - Market Conditions ......................................................................................................................................... - 40 - Location ........................................................................................................................................................ - 40 - Size ................................................................................................................................................................ - 40 - Shape ............................................................................................................................................................. - 41 - Use / Zoning .................................................................................................................................................. - 41 - Other ............................................................................................................................................................. - 41 -
ADJUSTMENT GRID EXHIBIT ............................................................................................................................... - 42 - DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS AFTER ADJUSTMENT ................................................................................................. - 43 - FEE SIMPLE LAND VALUE CALCULATION .......................................................................................................... - 44 - GROUND RENT ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. - 44 -
Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... - 44 - Ground Lease Returns .................................................................................................................................. - 44 -
FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE .................................................................................................................................... - 46 - EXPOSURE PERIOD .............................................................................................................................................. - 46 - MARKETING TIME .............................................................................................................................................. - 46 -
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITING CONDITIONS ........................................................................... - 47 -
TERMS & DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................. - 55 -
ADDENDUM: LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT ................................................................................................ - 59 -
ADDENDUM: EXPERIENCE DATA ............................................................................................................... - 61 -
Former Fairview Substation Assignment Overview
16-0380
Page - 1 -
Assignment Overview
Identity of Property
Name Former Fairview Substation
Brief Description The subject is a single, vacant lot which has been used in recent years as parking
to support a nearby property.
Address NSA E. 12th Avenue
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Geo Coordinates Latitude: 61°12'37.53'N, Longitude: 149°52'11.63'W
Physical Location The subject is located on the south side of 12th Avenue between Gambell and
Hyder Streets, which is within the Fairview neighborhood just southeast of
downtown.
Assessor’s Tax Parcel
Number(s)1
002-131-41
Abbreviated Legal
Description
West 47' of Lot 3, Block 18D, Third Addition of Anchorage Townsite,
Anchorage Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska,
according to Plat C-10A. (Per Department of Natural Resources
Records)
Current Use Vacant Land
Appraised Use Vacant Land
Highest and Best Use
AS VACANT May include development as retail, auto-retail, restaurant, office or other
unidentified use once feasibility has been ascertained. Parking and yard storage
would be a likely interim use, as has been the case historically.
Scope of Assignment
Value Definition(s) The following definition(s) of value is/are utilized in this report:
MARKET RENT2 The most probable rent that a property should bring in a competitive and open
market reflecting the conditions and restrictions of a specified lease agreement,
including the rental adjustment and revaluation, permitted uses, use restrictions, expense obligations, term, concessions, renewal and purchase options, and tenant
improvements (TIs).
1 Per Tax Assessor Records. 2 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition, Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015.
Ass
ign
men
t O
ver
vie
w
Former Fairview Substation Assignment Overview
16-0380
Page - 2 -
Other Definitions Please refer to the Terms & Definitions section presented in the Addenda for
additional definitions of significant terminology used in this report.
Purpose To estimate the market rent of the real estate in its current As Is condition.
Intended Use of
Appraisal
The intended use of the appraisal is for internal decisions, asset management, and
possible lease offering, and it may not be suitable for other uses.
Intended User(s) of
Appraisal
MOA Real Estate Department / Heritage Land Bank (the Client)
Property Interest
Appraised
This is an appraisal of the real property. Any intangible and personal property is
specifically excluded from this valuation.
Property Rights
Appraised
Fee Simple
Report Presentation Appraisal Report (the level of reporting herein is intended to meet the Client’s requirements, consistent with a summary format as defined in USPAP prior to the
2014-15 edition)
APPRAISAL REPORT /
SUMMARY REPORT
Prior to the 2014-2015 edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP), USPAP specified two primary narrative reporting formats:
Summary or Self-Contained. Subsequent editions of USPAP replaced these with
the Appraisal Report, a narrative format that is intended to provide minimum
reporting standards. Standard 2-2(a) of current USPAP states the following: “The
content of an Appraisal Report must be consistent with the intended use of the
appraisal and at a minimum…
(iii) summarize information sufficient to identify the real estate involved in the appraisal, including the physical, legal, and economic property characteristics
relevant to the assignment…
(vii) summarize the scope of work used to develop the appraisal…
(viii) summarize the information analyzed, the appraisal methods and techniques employed, and the reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions, and
conclusions; exclusion of the sales comparison approach, cost approach, or
income approach must be explained;
Comment: An Appraisal Report must include sufficient information to indicate
that the appraiser complied with the requirements of Standard I. The amount of detail required will vary with the significance of the information to the appraisal.
The appraiser must provide sufficient information to enable the client and intended users to understand the rationale for the opinions and conclusions,
including reconciliation of the data and approaches, in accordance with
Standards Rule 1-6.”
In essence, the Appraisal Report format is consistent with the Summary appraisal
format described in the 2012-2013 and prior editions of USPAP under Standards
Rule 2-2(b).
Former Fairview Substation Assignment Overview
16-0380
Page - 3 -
Inspection Date May 3, 2016
Effective Date May 3, 2016
Report Date May 4, 2016
Scope of Work
Overview Current USPAP requires the appraiser(s) to develop and report a scope of work
that results in credible results that are appropriate for the appraisal problem,
intended user(s) and intended use.
Limitations to Scope of
Work
USPAP permits limitations to the scope of work consistent with the appraisal
problem, intended user and intended use. The scope of work has been limited by
the General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions, Extraordinary Assumptions,
Extraordinary Limiting Conditions and Hypothetical Conditions discussed in the
report and Addenda. The Scope of Work has also been limited based on the level
of information / documentation available to the appraiser. Please reference the
extraordinary assumptions and limiting and hypothetical conditions presented later
in this section. There are no other major limitations to the scope of work for this
assignment.
Compliance The analysis and reporting of this assignment is compliant with the following:
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as
promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal
Foundation.
The bylaws of the Appraisal Institute.
Client appraisal standards as set forth in the letter of engagement
presented in the Addendum.
Assignment
Presentation
This is an Appraisal Report as defined by the Uniform Standard of Professional
Appraisal Practice under Standards Rule 2-2(a). This format provides a summary
of the appraisal process, subject data and valuation. The level of detail and
discussion included varies with the significance of the information to the
appraisal, within the context of the intended use and intended user(s). Note that
the Client has requested a summary format (as defined in USPAP prior to the
2014-2015 edition), and this report is intended to meet the Client’s requirements in
this regard.
This is a two-sided document with new sections beginning on odd numbered
pages. Note, where a section ends on an odd page Microsoft Word will
automatically insert a blank, even numbered page at the end of a section.
Subject Walk Through The subject's exterior has been observed, and photographs taken. The scope of
this walk-through is presented on the following table.
SCOPE OF WALK THROUGH
Item Viewed?
Neighborhood Yes
Subject Exterior Yes
Former Fairview Substation Assignment Overview
16-0380
Page - 4 -
Information Provided
to Appraiser for
Consideration
Primary data was obtained by the appraiser during the property walk-through.
Secondary sources of property data include client, borrower, and public records.
The scope of work is specific to the information on the subject provided to the
appraiser by the client or property contact. A partial list of items provided
follows:
Legal description and Assessor parcel number
Plat and grid maps
The following information was not available to the appraiser:
As built
Title report
Copies of lease or rental documents
Environmental study
A prior appraisal
Market Analysis Extensive research on macro and micro economic conditions within the subject’s
market has been conducted. Extensive research on current market conditions
within the subject’s sector of the real estate market has been conducted. The
Appraisal Institute recognizes two categories of market analysis: inferred and
fundamental. Inferred analyses (Level A and B) are basic methods by which
future supply and demand conditions are inferred by current and general market
conditions (secondary data). In fundamental analyses (Level C and D), general
information is supplemented by detailed data in order to forecast supply and
demand, as well as subject-specific absorption and capture (primary data). The
market analysis performed in this assignment is based on inferred demand.
Approaches to Value
LAND VALUATION This approach was developed because it is necessary to develop a credible and
reliable estimate of market value for this property type or it has been requested by
the client.
DIRECT RENTAL COMPARISON
Direct comparison is the preferred method for estimating market rent, provided
adequate comparable data is available for analysis. In this case, direct comparison
was not feasible or appropriate, at the local market does not typically evaluate
ground rent in this manner (that is, on a $/sq ft basis). Instead, an appropriate,
market-derived rate of return was applied to the concluded fee simple land value
for an indication of market rent.
Valuation Process The valuation process may include research and analysis performed as part of a
prior assignment, as well as new research performed specifically for this
assignment, and included but was not limited to the following:
1. The problem or nature of assignment was identified.
2. A scope of work was created that lead to credible results that are appropriate
for the appraisal problem, intended user and intended use.
3. Information necessary to complete the assignment was requested and
Former Fairview Substation Assignment Overview
16-0380
Page - 5 -
obtained from the client / property contact.
4. An area, city and neighborhood analysis has been performed.
5. An analysis of the subject’s physical and economic characteristics has been
performed.
6. Interviews have been performed with property representatives (owners,
property managers or leasing agents), brokers, investors, developers and
other individuals that might have useful knowledge and insight on the
subject.
7. Knowledgeable market participants have been interviewed on the market
conditions for properties similar to the subject.
8. An examination of current zoning codes affecting the property has been
performed.
9. The functional utility of the site has been determined.
10. A detailed examination of the subject’s economic characteristics has been
made to determine the property’s risk profile and economic potential.
11. A highest and best use analysis for the property was performed.
12. Extensive research to identify transactions involving similar properties was
performed.
13. An analysis of the subject and available data was performed using commonly
accepted valuation techniques and methodologies.
14. The quantity and quality of available data was considered along with the
applicability of the methodology used, and a reconciliation was performed to
arrive at the final value estimate(s).
Ownership and Sales Information
Current Owner of
Record
According to Tax Assessor Records, the subject is presently owned by
Municipality of Anchorage.
Three Year
Transaction History
Disclosure and analysis of the subject’s transaction history (sales, agreements of
sale, options, and listings) within the prior three years is required by USPAP and,
if applicable, is presented below.
NO RECENT ACTIVITY
No transactions involving the subject within the prior three years are known or
have been disclosed. A search of State of Alaska Department of Natural Resource
records indicates that the subject has not changed ownership within the last three
years.
Extraordinary Assumptions, Limiting Conditions & Special Risk Factors
Extraordinary assumptions, extraordinary limiting conditions and special risk
factors specific to this assignment follow. The value estimate(s) presented in this
Former Fairview Substation Assignment Overview
16-0380
Page - 6 -
report may be amended in the event that the extraordinary assumptions or limiting
conditions are found to be false. The reader is advised that the use of these
assumptions might have affected the assignment results.
1. According to the Client, this site was formerly used as a utility substation.
The substation was decommissioned at an unknown point and neither the
Client nor the Technical Service Superintendent has any specific knowledge
of the decommissioning. Given this past use, it is possible the site is
impacted by PCBs or other hazardous materials, although, again, no specific
information is available. Although requested, no environmental reports were
provided for this assignment. It is an extraordinary assumption of the
appraisal that the property is free and clear of any hazardous materials or
environmental contamination. An engineer or other appropriate expert
should be contacted if more information is required on this potential issue.
Hypothetical Conditions
Hypothetical conditions specific to this assignment are as follows. The reader is
advised that the use of these hypothetical conditions (if any) might have affected
the assignment results.
This appraisal is not predicated on any hypothetical conditions.
Competency of Appraiser
The appraisers have previously performed similar assignments and meet the
Competency Rule of USPAP. Please refer to the Experience Data presented in the
Addendum for further information on the appraiser’s background and experience.
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 7 -
Area Data
Regional Area Data
Whereas the nation lost 7.5 million wage and salary jobs from December 2007 to
June 2009 (the official dates of the “Great Recession”), the Alaskan economy
actually made modest gains. State economists attribute this stark result to
differences in the structure of the Alaskan economy. Chief among these are
Alaska’s large natural resource base, the lack of a significant manufacturing
sector, strong federal spending, a growing health care industry, and a resilient
tourism industry. In recent years, Alaska benefited from rapid growth in
developing countries that resulted in an undersupply of commodities, placing
upward pressure on prices.
Alaska is highly dependent on the production and price of oil, and while
production has steadily decreased from a high in the late 1980s, the price has been
volatile. Between 2013 and early 2014, oil showed stability above $95/barrel.
Though the problem of low production remained (and remains) a longer-term
concern, these oil prices provided bountiful revenue to Alaska at a time when
many other states were struggling with crippling budget deficits. However, due
primarily to a glut of new supply from the U.S. and some decreases in global
demand, prices began to slide in mid-2014. Currently, Alaskan crude stands at
roughly $30 per barrel. Should prices remain this low, the state government will
face a revenue shortfall of $3 billion and substantial budget-tightening (or
additional revenue sources) will presumably follow. Fortunately, the new More
Alaska Production Act (MAPA, upheld by voters in August 2014) brings in
somewhat more revenue to the state than did the prior ACES tax structure at these
lower prices. Moreover, the state has roughly $10 billion in budget reserves
which can offset revenue shortfalls for nearly three years without budget cuts.
The State also has $52 billion within the Permanent Fund, which while not legal
for lawmakers to spend without amending the State constitution (requiring a
2/3rds majority vote), does suggest a strong balance sheet. That said, the State has
700 fewer full-time positions as of December 2015 than it did in December 2014.
The pressure on the State’s budget is obvious, as reflected by recent downgrading
of its credit outlook to “negative” by both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s (which
also downgraded its rating from AAA to AA+). Ultimately, the full impact of
lower oil prices will not be known until more clarity is available regarding the
period of time these prices are likely to persist.
Looking to the future, the state awaits progress in the development of a proposed
natural gas pipeline that would provide a significant boost to the economy. A
number of options are currently being discussed, including route, pipeline
diameter, and level of State ownership. The likelihood and timing of an LNG
pipeline remain uncertain. With respect to offshore drilling, Royal Dutch Shell’s
recent experience and subsequent decision to pull-out of Alaska for the
foreseeable future likely means there is little near-term prospect for exploration by
other firms in the Arctic waters as well. Beyond oil and gas, the state economy
continues to benefit from a confluence of strong production and stable prices for
several other natural resources (minerals and seafood).
Are
a D
ata
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 8 -
Also buttressing the Alaskan economy is the level of federal spending in the state.
For example, in FY2010, the U.S. government sent a total of $15 billion to Alaska
and its residents. This sum made Alaska the highest recipient of per capita federal
dollars for the year. The level of federal spending has decreased in subsequent
years, but the state's amount per-capita is still thought to be roughly 40% above
the national average. Meanwhile, job gains in the health care industry have been
consistent and strong for most of the last decade. According to the Alaska
Department of Labor, the health care industry added 500 jobs in 2015, and it is
expected to add another 500 jobs in 2016. Lastly, after down years in 2009 and
2010, tourism leveled out and then experienced more noticeable improvement in
2012 through 2015. State economists expect that the combination of a
strengthening national economy and the addition of several cruise ships to the
Alaskan market will continue to provide a boost for this important industry.
Historic employment changes, as well as the forecast for 2016 are presented in the
following chart:
According to state economists, Alaska has significantly outperformed the nation’s
economy as a whole during the past decade. After the minor losses in 2009 ended
21 straight years of overall job growth, Alaska has gained jobs every year since.
That said, growth was modest in both 2014 and 2015. Employment gains in 2015
were seen in the leisure and hospitality trade, construction and oil and gas sector,
among others. Federal government in 2015 remained flat, state government
experienced a loss of 2.6% of its workforce, while local government lost 0.7%.
The outlook for 2016 is a minor loss of jobs directly tied to low oil prices. Health
care and the leisure and hospitality industries should lead the way in overall job
gains while most other industries will likely decline slightly or remain flat. The
only other sectors expected to grow slightly are retail and manufacturing. In
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 9 -
summary, the Alaska economy remains healthy and stable at this time, although
there is clearly nervousness stemming from low oil prices and State government
budget pressures.
Local Area Data
Anchorage is located in Southcentral Alaska. It is the largest city in Alaska and is
home to over 40% of the state’s population. As the state’s economic hub, the
local economy benefits from its substantial commerce with other communities
throughout Alaska. Major economic influences include trade, transportation, and
utilities (21% of employment), government (18%), education and health services
(16%), and professional and business services (12%). The oil and gas industry
comprises less than 2% of employment - although its total impact is certainly
more significant than that figure would imply. Per capita income levels in
Anchorage are among the highest in the state, while unemployment is generally
less seasonal and lower overall.
After shedding jobs and ending a 20-year streak of employment growth in 2009,
the Anchorage economy gained 500 jobs in 2010. Contrasted with the nation as a
whole, which lost 6% of its wage and salary jobs during the official dates of the
recession, the Anchorage economy lost less than a mere 1% in 2009. Similar to
the state of Alaska, 2011 through 2013 built upon the minor growth of 2010.
Though the employment gains seen in 2013 were less than that of 2012, modest
job growth was still seen in this year as well. A net loss of jobs was seen in 2014,
at -0.5%, and a small gain of 0.4% was seen in 2015. Among industries
experiencing gains in 2015 were educational and health services, leisure and
hospitality, and retail trade. Conversely, manufacturing, financial activities, and
federal and state government lost a relatively modest number of jobs. Data
released by the Alaska Department of Labor indicates that the average monthly
unemployment rate in Anchorage during 2015 was 5.3%, which is a relatively
healthy rate by historical standards and slightly below the national average of
5.4%. Historic employment changes as well as the forecast for 2016 are presented
in the following chart:
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 10 -
The Alaska Department of Labor projects a year of minor job losses in Anchorage
for 2016. Among the industries forecast to experience growth are educational and
health services, and leisure and hospitality. Meanwhile, those forecast to shed
jobs are state government, natural resources and mining, construction and
professional and business services.
A recent summary of Anchorage, according to Moody’s Analytics: “Anchorage’s
expansion is losing steam, but the resilient energy and white-collar services
industries are limiting the severity of the slowdown. The large public sector is
declining thanks to decreased federal funding and local government layoffs.”
That said, the metro area is anchored by two large military bases, and as Alaska’s
economic hub, it benefited from the federal stimulus - of which the state was the
largest recipient on a per capita basis. Moody’s also observes that it has a
relatively diverse economy, serves as the transportation gateway to Alaska, offers
an educated workforce, and is seeing an expanding population. Taken together,
the Anchorage economy is currently stable and healthy, though it is anticipated to
experience modest job loss in the upcoming year. As with Alaska as a whole,
there is obviously concern stemming from low oil prices and subsequent revenue
shortfalls at the state government level. For comparison, detailed demographics
for Alaska’s major cities are presented on the Demographic Data Exhibit on the
following page.
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 11 -
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 12 -
Demographic Data Exhibit
Anchorage Municipality Fairbanks North Star Juneau Ketchikan Gateway Matanuska-Susitna Alaska United States
Summary 2010 2015 2020 2010 2015 2020 2010 2015 2020 2010 2015 2020 2010 2015 2020 2010 2015 2020 2010 2015 2020
Population 291,826 301,202 312,101 97,581 103,197 107,546 31,275 33,392 35,384 13,477 13,712 13,916 88,995 97,117 105,918 710,231 741,123 773,619 308,745,538 318,536,439 330,622,575
Households 107,332 111,338 115,631 36,441 38,853 40846 12,187 13,130 14,023 5,305 5,445 5,543 31,824 35,047 38,423 258,058 271,419 284,770 116,716,292 120,746,349 125,477,562
Families 70,544 72,640 75,093 23,726 25,106 26,267 7,742 8,278 8,797 3,369 3,430 3,475 22,579 24,712 26,987 170,750 178,364 186,373 77,538,296 79,691,683 82,498,212
Average Household Size 2.64 2.63 2.63 2.56 2.54 2.52 2.49 2.48 2.46 2.49 2.47 2.46 2.75 2.73 2.72 2.65 2.63 2.62 2.58 2.57 2.57
Owner Occupied HUs 64,285 65,138 67,691 21,410 22,432 23,638 7,590 8,037 8,583 3,076 3,118 3,182 24,181 26,373 28,916 162,765 168,584 177,360 75,986,074 76,019,723 78,734,306
Renter Occupied HUs 43,047 46,200 47,940 15,031 16,421 17,208 4,597 5,093 5,440 2,229 2,327 2,361 7,643 8,674 9,507 95,293 102,835 107,410 40,730,218 44,726,626 46,743,256
Median Age 33.0 33.7 34.4 31.2 32.4 33.6 38.0 38.5 38.3 38.3 39.1 39.7 34.8 35.6 36.1 33.9 34.6 35.3 37.1 37.9 38.6
Trends: 2015-2020 Annual Rate
Population 0.71% 0.83% 1.17% 0.30% 1.75% 0.86% 0.75%
Households 0.76% 1.01% 1.32% 0.36% 1.86% 0.96% 0.77%
Families 0.67% 0.91% 1.22% 0.26% 1.78% 0.88% 0.69%
Owner HHs 0.77% 1.05% 1.32% 0.41% 1.86% 1.02% 0.70%
Median Household Income 2.39% 3.61% 2.65% 2.94% 2.31% 2.77% 2.66%
Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
< $15,000 6,654 6.0% 2,968 7.6% 652 5.0% 306 5.6% 2,400 6.8% 19,874 7.3% 15,400,466 12.8%
$15,000 - $24,999 7,765 7.0% 2,873 7.4% 481 3.7% 364 6.7% 2,021 5.8% 19,767 7.3% 12,433,476 10.3%
$25,000 - $34,999 7,267 6.5% 3,048 7.8% 896 6.8% 609 11.2% 1,804 5.1% 20,164 7.4% 12,393,437 10.3%
$35,000 - $49,999 13,434 12.1% 5,462 14.1% 1,410 10.7% 609 11.2% 3,318 9.5% 32,624 12.0% 16,288,264 13.5%
$50,000 - $74,999 20,333 18.3% 7,820 20.1% 2,202 16.8% 1,297 23.8% 7,346 21.0% 51,353 18.9% 21,288,338 17.6%
$75,000 - $99,999 15,554 14.0% 5,155 13.3% 2,936 22.4% 922 16.9% 5,917 16.9% 41,226 15.2% 15,085,777 12.5%
$100,000 - $149,999 21,513 19.3% 7,061 18.2% 2,628 20.0% 727 13.4% 7,763 22.2% 48,689 17.9% 15,564,784 12.9%
$150,000 - $199,999 10,088 9.1% 2,481 6.4% 1,060 8.1% 288 5.3% 2,847 8.1% 21,319 7.9% 6,172,851 5.1%
$200,000+ 8,730 7.8% 1,985 5.1% 865 6.6% 323 5.9% 1,631 4.7% 16,402 6.0% 6,117,224 5.1%
2000 2015 2020 2000 2015 2020 2000 2015 2020 2000 2015 2020 2000 2015 2020 2000 2015 2020 2000 2015 2020
Median Household Income $55,401 $75,257 $84,700 $49,145 $63,870 $76,264 $61,862 $80,932 $92,242 $51,088 $63,500 $73,393 $51,062 $76,972 $86,265 $51,581 $69,682 $79,881 $42,164 $53,217 $60,683
Average Household Income $67,906 $96,173 $108,061 $58,561 $83,381 $94,654 $69,983 $96,014 $109,216 $61,519 $83,796 $96,449 $59,782 $90,172 $100,967 $62,475 $88,585 $99,528 $56,644 $74,699 $84,910
Per Capita Income $25,287 $36,279 $40,753 $21,553 $32,522 $37,055 $26,719 $38,085 $43,602 $23,994 $33,532 $38,675 $21,105 $32,899 $36,962 $22,660 $33,111 $37,289 $21,587 $28,597 $32,501
Source: STDB Online
Adversity Index http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29976394/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/
2015 20152015 20152015 2015 2015
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 13 -
Neighborhood Data
Name East Downtown Anchorage / Fairview
Location & Access The neighborhood is located southeast of the Anchorage Central Business District
(CBD) proper, within the Fairview residential neighborhood. The neighborhood
location and access / linkages are shown on the street and aerial photos that
follow. Neighborhood access is considered typical of the market.
Overview The subject is located at the far edge of Downtown Anchorage. In general terms,
Downtown Anchorage is the civic, tourist, artistic, and cultural center of
Anchorage. Some of Anchorage’s most prestigious office locations are found
downtown. Surrounding this professional aspect of Downtown are a wide variety
of bars, restaurants, hotels, shopping destinations and tourist activities, which
make Downtown appealing to a wide variety of real estate market segments.
Beyond the edge of downtown proper are a wide array of uses, including auto-
retail, light industrial, single-family and multi-family residential.
Character & Land
Uses
The neighborhood character is demonstrated by the neighborhood photos that
follow. These photos were taken within close proximity to the subject and are
representative of the character of the neighborhood. As with most of Alaska and
Anchorage, neighborhood land uses are mixed. Major streets are developed
predominantly with office, retail, auto dealerships, and other commercial uses
while interior streets are developed with a combination of commercial, light
industrial, older residential and yard storage.
Typical Age of
Improvements
Most construction in the immediate vicinity (east downtown) occurred in the
1960s through 1970s. New construction has occurred only sporadically since that
time. In the primary downtown area, more significant construction has occurred
so much of the product is incrementally newer than that of east downtown.
Percent Land
Developed
Roughly 90%+
Life Cycle Mature / Revitalization
This is an established neighborhood. Older improvements continue to be
periodically renovated, converted to new uses, or demolished to make way for
more intensive uses. In fact, downtown parcels – admittedly those closer to the
CBD – are typically bought and sold based on underlying land value, with little if
any contributory value assigned to older residences and other such under-
improvements.
New Construction The immediate neighborhood surrounding the subject consists of a mix of older
residential and commercial uses. At the southeastern fringe of Downtown, it is
situated between the commercial neighborhood along 5th / 6th Avenues and the
Fairview residential neighborhood to the east. Renovation of older buildings is
occurring sporadically here. A significant development in the last few years was
the complete renovation of the old Mackay Building, which had stood derelict for
decades. This building was renovated and converted into apartments and assisted
living, and is now known as McKinley Tower. The adjacent Annex Building was
also renovated and converted to office, now known as the JGB Memorial building.
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 14 -
In addition, Sullivan Manor, a senior housing facility, was developed to the east of
McKinley Tower in 2005. The former Holiday Inn at 4th Avenue and C Street was
converted to 200 units of multifamily residential (roughly half of which are set
aside as affordable housing) in early 2013, and it is now known as The Lofts.
A 33,000 sq ft low-rise office building on the corner of Cordova and 4th Avenue
was completely renovated prior to the building’s recent signing of a long-term
lease with The State of Alaska. A new fire station was constructed at 4th Avenue
and A Street in 2000.
In the greater Downtown area, the Anchorage Museum, located at 6th Avenue and
A Street, just underwent a $116 million expansion. The 80,000 sq ft addition
includes a planetarium and theatre; a large open-air common featuring outdoor
galleries and an outdoor ice-skating rink; new galleries and shops; the Arctic
Studies Center, which will contain some 600 artifacts; and numerous activities
designed to engage families and children.
The 210,000 sq ft Dena’ina Civic and Convention Center, located at 7th Avenue
and G Street, opened to the public in Fall 2008. The $111 million project will
allow Anchorage to host large conventions or multiple mid-sized conventions and
is anticipated to increase visitor volumes in Anchorage. The $44 million Linny
Pacillo Parking Garage, located across the street from Dena’ina on 7th Avenue and
F Street, opened in Fall 2008 as well. The new garage can accommodate 844
vehicles and also offers street level suites occupied by restaurants and a bank
branch.
The JC Penney Garage, at 6th Avenue and D Street, underwent a $1.6 million
renovation. Significant road improvements were completed during 2008 and
2009, which targeted high traffic areas and are intended to improve the roads and
surrounding area throughput
Trends The neighborhood is currently stabilized; however, anticipated increases in the
demand for office and retail space as well as multi-family housing around the
Downtown periphery will continue to drive sporadic development in the future.
The immediate area has vacant land available (typically used as yard storage or
used car lots), but it is mostly developed. This limited supply is beginning to put
older properties in demand among investors and developers, who will then either
renovate them, or else demolish them and develop new structures on the site.
However, this is occurring closer to the CBD while the subject’s immediate
vicinity has seen little activity. Given surrounding land uses, future development
in the longer term will continue to be a mixture of commercial and multi-family
residential uses that complement the wide variety of users comprising the greater
Downtown market.
Conclusion
Conclusion The subject is located at the southeastern edge of downtown. The immediate
neighborhood is characterized by a mixture of older commercial uses, ranging
from retail to restaurants, to used car lots and service garages – along with older
residential uses. This particular portion of downtown is generally not held in high
regard - it was recently labeled a “deteriorated area” by Assemblyman Patrick
Flynn, who proposed real estate tax exemptions for developers in order to
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 15 -
hopefully spur new construction, redevelopment, and remediation of
environmental contamination. Even so, it has been experiencing very sporadic re-
development over the past decade. As underlying land values continue to
gradually increase in the long run, more redevelopment of improvements past their
economic lives is expected. Overall, the subject’s neighborhood has a marginally
positive influence on market value, although it is recognized that current demand
is relatively low here which often leads to more extended marketing times.
Impact of Low Oil Prices
Current Conditions As discussed in the Area Data chapter(s), the price of crude oil has dropped to
roughly half of what it was just over one year ago. Although it has been holding
fairly steady since then, most experts do not expect a return to previous high price
levels in the near to mid-term. This is obviously of concern in Alaska, as the vast
majority of state government revenue stems from oil. However, available sale and
lease transactions in the local market have not yet demonstrated a change in
vacancy rates, prices, rents or capitalization rates. There is certainly nervousness
as low oil prices drag on and the State debates spending cuts (and/or revenue
increases via new taxes), but the market data does not indicate that real estate
fundamentals have been negatively impacted thus far.
Discussions with local brokers indicate that some buyers and tenants have begun
raising state economy issues for leverage in their negotiations. However, thus far
at least, the sellers and landlords apparently have not been appreciably changing
their positions. Lease renewals continue to be reported at approximately the same
rates as the prior term, although some landlords appear more willing to offer minor
concessions in the form of included parking downtown or perhaps slightly higher
TI allowances. In some cases, landlords have even achieved minor rent bumps
with no concessions given. Regarding sale prices, the number of transactions
available for analysis remains low in most cases. This is not a departure from
historic patterns in this relatively small market.
With respect to capitalization rates, it should be recognized that there has been rate
compression nationally over the last few years primarily due to historically-low
interest rates. Yet this has shown up in only muted fashion in Alaska, as cap rates
have held mostly steady based on available sale transactions. It could well be that
the downward pressure from interest rates has been responsible for counteracting
some upward pressure beginning to stem from low oil prices and other state-
specific realities. That said, it could also be that gradually increasing investor
return requirements are not yet reflected in the historic transactional data.
Generally speaking, appraisers must be careful to reflect the market based on
evidence rather than dictate it based on emotion or opinion. Interviews with
brokers, property managers and owners can provide meaningful insight into
market expectations. While consideration is given to expected future trends,
weight is necessarily (and appropriately) placed on actual, documented market
activity to date. Efforts have been made to obtain and analyze the most recent sale
and lease transactions available in the subject’s market segment. It is the
appraiser’s opinion the available data fairly represents current market and
economic conditions.
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 16 -
Immediate Neighborhood Aerial Photograph
Former Fairview Substation Area Data
16-0380
Page - 17 -
Immediate Neighborhood Photographs
Alexander’s Body Shop Typical storage yard Barry’s Lounge
Vacant retail (former Spirits of Alaska liquor store) Typical office/shop. Light-n Up shop building
Former Fairview Substation Description of Site
16-0380
Page - 19 -
Description of Site
Description of Site
Name Former Fairview Substation
Address NSA E. 12th Avenue
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Geo Coordinates Latitude: 61°12'37.53'N, Longitude: 149°52'11.63'W
Physical Location The subject is located on the south side of 12th Avenue between Gambell and
Hyder Streets, which is within the Fairview neighborhood just southeast of
downtown..
Assessor’s Tax Parcel
Number(s)3
002-131-41
Abbreviated Legal
Description
West 47' of Lot 3, Block 18D, Third Addition of Anchorage Townsite, Anchorage Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska,
according to Plat C-10A. (Per Department of Natural Resources
Records)
Gross Site Area 6,580 Sq Ft
Upon review of the site’s physical and economic characteristics, there do not
appear to be any factors that would reduce the usable area. Nonetheless, a survey
of the site indicating usable area was not provided to the appraiser. The market
value of this report assumes that all of the site’s gross land area is usable. In the
event that a portion of the site were found to be un-usable, the market value of the
subject could be less than the current estimate.
Shape The site is roughly rectangular.
Street Frontage The subject has approximately 47'’ of frontage on East 12th Avenue, as well as
along the alleyway to the south. East 12th is a low-traffic, interior, commercial
neighborhood street.
Access Access to and from the subject is considered average relative to competing
properties.
Exposure Exposure of the subject is considered average relative to competing properties,
although it would not be adequate for most retail uses.
Adjacent Land Uses /
Businesses
NORTH East 12th Avenue and auto shop
3 Per Tax Assessor Records.
Des
crip
tion
of
Sit
e
Former Fairview Substation Description of Site
16-0380
Page - 20 -
SOUTH Office
EAST Fenced yard area, older residence
WEST Shop/office
Topography The subject has level topography, and is at grade with surrounding properties.
Soil Conditions Soils conditions in the subject’s market are not uniform and can vary widely from
one site to another. No soils report was provided. It is an ordinary assumption of
this report that the soil conditions are sufficient quality to support the existing
parking lot and any future development likely for the site.
Wetlands No surface water was noted during the walk-through and the subject does not
appear to contain any wetlands.
Hazardous Conditions A complete environmental site assessment was not available to the appraiser.
There are no known or disclosed environmental issues, or hazardous conditions,
impacting the subject. The detection of hazardous materials or conditions is
beyond the scope of expertise and competency of an appraiser, however, and it is
recommended that any concerns relating to hazardous conditions be addressed by
a qualified environmental specialist. Furthermore, it is an extraordinary
assumption of this report that there are no hazardous conditions present at the
subject.
Flood Zone The Flood Emergency Management Agency or FEMA has prepared flood
insurance rate maps for various communities in the State. According to the flood
insurance map, community panel number 020005-0753D, issued by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency and last updated September 25, 2009, the
subject is located within the following zone:
ZONE C / X (UNSHADED)
Minimal risk areas outside the 1-percent and .2-percent-annual-chance
floodplains. No BFEs or base flood depths are shown within these zones. (Zone X
(unshaded) is used on new and revised maps in place of Zone C.)
Earthquake Zone Alaska is a seismically active region. A geotechnical hazards survey was
completed for the Municipality of Anchorage in 1979. This survey indicates the
subject is located in Zone 2, which is described as having a moderately low risk of
ground failure. In certain instances, lending institutions will require that
earthquake insurance be obtained for properties located within high risk zones.
Other than the premium in the cost of obtaining earthquake insurance, data does
not indicate any discount in value for properties located in higher risk areas. In
fact, most competing properties in the subject’s area have similar levels of
earthquake risk.
Utilities All public utilities appear to be available to the site.
Former Fairview Substation Description of Site
16-0380
Page - 21 -
Aerial Photograph Exhibit
Former Fairview Substation Description of Site
16-0380
Page - 22 -
Grid Map Exhibit
Former Fairview Substation Description of Site
16-0380
Page - 23 -
Zoning
GENERAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT (B-3), MUNICIPALITY OF
ANCHORAGE
Intent: The B-3 district is intended primarily for general commercial uses in
commercial centers and areas exposed to heavy traffic. These commercial uses are
intended to be located on arterials, or within commercial centers of town, and to
be provided with adequate public services and facilities. They are subject to the
public view and should provide an attractive appearance with landscaping,
sufficient parking, and controlled traffic movement. Environmental impacts
should be minimized. Abutting residential areas should be protected from
potentially negative impacts associated with commercial activity. While B-3
district areas shall continue to meet the need for auto-related and other auto-
oriented uses, it is the municipality’s intent that the B-3 district also shall provide
for safe and convenient personal mobility in other forms. Planning and design
shall accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. In addition to a wide range of
commercial office, retail and commercial services, other use categories such as
residential and community uses, and mixed-use projects, are allowed.
Permitted Uses: Business, professional and personal services, office, mixed-use
and multi-family residential, parks & playgrounds, child and adult care facilities,
educational, religious assembly, retail, food & beverage services, agricultural uses,
vehicle sales, rental & repair, hotel/motel/inn, parking structure, hospital and
nursing facilities.
Conditional Uses: High voltage transmission tower, vocational or trade school,
correctional community residential centers, public safety facility, light contractor
and special trades, commercial food production, light warehouse or wholesale
establishment, snow disposal sites, natural resource extraction.
Prohibited Uses: Single-family dwellings, duplexes, cemetery or mausoleum,
correctional institution, airport or airstrip, rail yard or railroad freight terminal,
utility facility, wind energy conservation system, civic/convention center, golf
course, motorized sports facility, shooting range, general industrial services, heavy
equipment sales and rental, general manufacturing, marine facilities, impound,
salvage or storage yards, composting facility, landfill, solid waste transfer facility.
Basic Design Standards:
Permitted Residential Units: Multi-family
Minimum Lot Size: 6,000 sq ft
Minimum Width: 50’
Front Setback: 0’ if mixed-use development; 10' for all other
uses
Side Setback: 15' if adjacent to residential; 0' nonresidential
Rear Setback: 15' if adjacent to residential; 0' nonresidential
Maximum Height: 45' except certain Midtown areas where height is
unrestricted
Maximum Site Coverage: 50% for residential uses; 100% all other uses
The subject’s zoning is not unduly restrictive, permits a wide variety of uses that
are consistent with its highest and best use as vacant, and does not appear to
materially limit the economic potential or functional utility of the property.
Former Fairview Substation Description of Site
16-0380
Page - 24 -
Easements, Covenants,
Encroachments &
Restrictions
Although requested, a title report was not provided for this assignment. Neither
the grid map nor the plat map (which is admittedly quite old) show any easements.
That said, normal easements along property boundaries for streets or utilities are
assumed. No legal restrictions or encumbrances that would adversely affect use or
marketability of the property are known. Title and land use, however are legal
issues and an attorney should be consulted relating to questions on these matters.
It is an ordinary assumption of this report that there are no significant restrictions
that would adversely affect use or marketability of the property.
Site Improvements The site is paved, and the asphalt appears to be older but in average condition
overall. There is also chain link fencing along the north, east and south
boundaries (again, older but in average condition). The contributory value of
these site improvements is nominal, and is considered implicitly in the
reconciliation of value.
Functional Utility The site is small and could accommodate only a very small development. All
utilities are present, and soils are presumably buildable. Access and exposure are
average, but as an interior lot this would not likely appeal to most retail users.
Generally speaking, the property is located in a relatively low-demand portion of
east downtown for most retail and office uses. There are no other known physical
or economic characteristics that limit the site’s development potential and level of
functional utility. Overall, the site is concluded to provide below average utility
for the variety of uses consistent with zoning.
Former Fairview Substation Property Assessment & Taxes
16-0380
Page - 25 -
Property Assessment & Taxes
Summary of Property Assessment & Taxes
Real Property Properties located within the subject’s market are assessed by the assessor every
year. By statute, each property must be assessed at 100% of market value. The
millage rate (on which property taxes are based) is determined annually based on
spending and assessment levels. Millage rates vary constantly and are influenced
by state law and services provided in each individual district. The assessed value
of all properties located within a district is divided by a particular year’s budget
requirements to arrive at a millage rate. Thus, actual spending determines the
amount of tax, and assessment allocates the tax among property owners.
Therefore, an increase or decrease in total assessment will not, by itself, result in a
change in the total property tax collected.
While mass appraisal is useful for the allocation of the total tax liability among
property owners, it is not always a reliable indicator of the market value of a
specific property. As such, market participants do not generally use assessed
value to determine market value. Market participants do carefully analyze the
impact of current and projected real estate taxes on cash flow and market value.
While Alaska is a non-disclosure state and the assessor does not have access to
sale information, they do have confirmation from the recorder’s office of a sale
occurring. Often times the assessment the year following a sale increases
dramatically with the burden of disproving the assessment falling on the property
owner. This in turn often requires disclosure of any subject sale. Because of these
factors, irrespective of actual historic assessment, most market participants input
real estate taxes on a stabilized basis, where projected assessment correlates with
the estimated market value and is reflective of assessment in a post-sale
environment.
In recent years, the assessment-to-value ratio has been increasing within the
subject’s market. Most similar properties in the subject’s market have been
historically assessed at between 70% and 90% of their actual market values. This
is in part because Alaska is a non-disclosure state and in part that values have been
increasing and it often takes several years for this to be reflected in the assessment.
While not a regular occurrence, on occasion the assessment on a property will be
above market value. In these cases, an MAI appraisal is usually sufficient
documentation for the assessor to make an adjustment to the assessed valuation.
In the event that the assessor is unwilling to change the assessment an appeal may
be filed. If the appeal is not granted by the assessor the tax payer has the right to
be heard in front of the Board of Equalization. Of note, the taxpayer also has the
right to appeal assessed value based on equity (the relative assessment of the
subject compared to similar properties).
In the subject’s case, no historic assessment information is available due to its
public ownership. Were the property to sell to a non-tax-exempt entity, it would
presumably be assessed at that point.
Prop
erty
Ass
essm
en
t &
Taxes
Former Fairview Substation Subject Photographs
16-0380
Page - 27 -
Subject Photographs
Facing east along 12th
Avenue; Subject at right..
Facing south from 12th
Avenue towards subject.
Su
bje
ct P
hoto
gra
ph
s
Former Fairview Substation Subject Photographs
16-0380
Page - 28 -
Facing west along 12th
Avenue; Subject at left.
Former Fairview Substation Highest & Best Use
16-0380
Page - 29 -
Highest & Best Use
Definition & Methodology
“Highest & Best Use” is defined as:
“The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest
value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and
maximum productivity.”4
Scope of Highest &
Best Use
A specific determination of highest and best use would require specific cost
estimates, which were not available to the appraiser, and is beyond the scope of
this assignment. Unless otherwise indicated, the highest and best use as vacant
analysis should not be construed as a feasibility study, which is beyond the scope
of the current assignment. Rather, the analysis is meant to provide a general
indication of highest and best use based on a qualitative review of the available
evidence. Furthermore, unless otherwise indicated, the assignment is not a
feasibility study of potential conversion or renovation of the property and
continued use “as is” or “as proposed” is implicit in the current value estimate.
As Vacant
Legally Permissible Private restrictions, zoning, building codes, historic district controls and
environmental regulations determine those uses legally permissible on a site. No
private restrictions or historical district controls encumber the subject site. In
addition, there are no known environmental regulations that inhibit development
of the site.
Physically Possible Size, shape, area, terrain, accessibility and availability of utilities affect the uses
under which a property can be developed.
Financially Feasible Feasibility is indicated by construction trends in the vicinity and current market
conditions. All uses that are expected to produce a positive return are regarded as
financially feasible.
Maximally Productive When development options are available, a determination must be made as to
which feasible use is the maximally profitable use.
Within this market, the presence of developer’s margin is highly specific to the
individual project. Nonetheless, it is noted that developer’s margins have been
attained within the subject’s geographic area for a wide variety of property types
in certain cases. The majority of new construction, however, has been by owner-
users whose needs were not met by the existing inventory and there has been less
speculative development.
In general, this specific portion of east downtown is not an in-demand location for
retail or office use. The vicinity is comprised of a mixture of shop/industrial
buildings, liquor stores, lower quality retail and office buildings, older residential
4 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015.
Hig
hes
t &
Bes
t U
se
Former Fairview Substation Highest & Best Use
16-0380
Page - 30 -
and yard storage. While there is residential nearby (to serve or which could
accommodate employees), the Fairview neighborhood is regarded by typical
market participants as being of lower appeal than most other residential districts in
Anchorage. Rents in the neighborhood tend to fall towards the lower end of the
local market. Thus, while redevelopment with a more intensive use will
presumably make sense at some point in the future, indications are that the current
use (interim) will remain the highest and best use for the foreseeable future.
Based on a review of the subject’s zoning, land use trends, neighborhood
characteristics and trends, shape, size, functional utility as well as market vacancy
rates, rental rates and other factors, the subject’s highest and best use as vacant
may include holding for future development or immediate development as retail,
auto-retail, restaurant, office, or other unidentified use that provides the highest
return to the underlying land once feasibility has been ascertained. Surface
parking or yard storage would be an obvious interim use, as in fact the property
has been used historically.
Probable Buyer
As vacant land, the subject could potentially appeal to investors (developers) or
users. Either type could be considered a probable buyer.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 31 -
Land Valuation
Introduction
Methodology Land is customarily valued as though unimproved and available for development
to the use, which would justify the highest price and the greatest net return. Sales
of unimproved land most similar to the subject are investigated and the most
appropriate transactions are analyzed. The land value estimate traditionally
reflects the fee simple value of raw land with good soils, available access,
available utilities, minimal site work completed, generally level and at grade, with
no site improvements (paving, landscaping, lighting, fencing, etc.).
Units of Comparison Units of comparison, components into which properties may be divided for
purposes of comparison, are derived from comparable sales data. Brokers,
developers and other market participants indicated a common unit of comparison
for properties in this market is the price per sq ft of usable land area.
Comparable Data
Sources of Data The following transactions were obtained from various sources including web
sites (Alaska Multiple Listing Service, Loopnet and Craigslist), brokers, assessors,
appraisers, other individuals and most notably the Reliant, LLC internal database.
Availability of Data The availability of comparable data is a function of the subject’s location, property
type, property size, market size and market activity. Sales activity involving
vacant parcels in east downtown / Fairview has been sporadic in past years. That
said, market research identified a number of relatively recent (for this area) sale
transactions. The available data is considered adequate if not ideal to derive a
credible indication of value in this case. An additional sale from south Anchorage
was included to supplement the more dated data. Several local brokers were also
interviewed for this assignment to provide additional anecdotal evidence given the
data limitations.
Presentation of Data The most relevant data for these transactions is presented on the following
summary table. The following map highlights the location of the comparables
relative to the subject.
Lan
d V
alu
ati
on
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 32 -
Summary of Comparable Land Sales Exhibit
No. Name Usable Land
Sq Ft
Utilities Soil Conditions Current Use Access / Exposure Shape Date Marketing
Time
Nominal
Price
Analysis
Price
No. Legal Description Acres Zoning Intended Use Road Frontage Topography Transaction
Type
$/Sq Ft
L-1 626 Gambell St. - 1415 3,100 Good Office Average / Good Rectangular Nov-10 24 months $70,000 $70,000
E 1/2 Lot 12, Block 16, East Addn.
Original Townsite
0.07 B-3, General Business Office 44' Generally Level Closed $22.58
L-2 640 Gambell St. - 1409 13,643 Good Vacant Land Average / Good Rectangular Sep-11 1 month $235,000 $305,000
Lot 14A, Block 16, East Addition
Subd.
0.31 B-3, General Business Commercial 243' Generally Level Closed $22.36
L-3 744 E. 12th Ave. - 2659 7,000 Good Vacant Land Average / Average Rectangular Jul-13 18 months $78,000 $85,800
Lot 1, Block 18D, Third Addition 0.16 B-3, General Business Residential 190' Generally Level Closed $12.26
L-4 3208 Spenard Rd - 2654 16,383 Good Vacant Land Average / Average Trapezoidal Dec-14 9 months $225,000 $270,000
Lts 1-3, Roberts & Wilson 0.38 B-3, General Business 0 150' Generally Level Closed $16.48
L-5 702 W 27th Ave - 2635 6,944 Average Vacant Land Average / Average Rectangular Oct-15 3 Months $140,000 $140,000
Lt 6 Blk 2, Parmenter 0.16 B-3, General Business Auto Detail 56' Level & At
Grade
Closed $20.16
L-6 1401 Hyder St - 2653 7,000 Good Vacant Land Average / Average Rectangular Dec-15 9 years $114,900 $114,900
Lot 12, Block 27C, Third Addn 0.16 B-3, General Business Investment 190' Generally Level Expired Listing-
w/ Offers
$16.41
L-7 636 Ingra St - 2655 42,000 Good Parking Average / Average Rectangular May-16 3 months $800,000 $800,000
Lts 7-12, Blk 15C, East Addn. 0.96 B-3, General Business Unknown 300' Generally Level Listing $19.05
Subj Former Fairview Substation 6,580 Good Parking Average / Average Rectangular Appraisal - - - - - - $92,000
Subj West 47' of Lot 3, Block 18D, Third
Addition of Anchorage Townsite,
0.15 B-3, General Business 47' Level $14.00
All Available
All Available
All Available
All Available
All Available
All Available
All Available
All available
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 33 -
Map of Comparable Land Sales Exhibit
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 34 -
Description of Data
Sale No. L-1
This is the sale of a vintage 1960 772 sq ft single family residence that was in poor
condition at time of sale. The buyer intended to convert the residence into office,
which will require a complete interior gutting, including new mechanical and
electrical. Exterior work will also be required. Note that the property was
originally listed for $200,000 in November 2008 and was incrementally lowered
over time to $89,000 in July 2010. While the lot was improved at the time of sale,
at $70,000 ($22.58/sq ft) the property essentially sold for land value. According
to the listing agent/seller, the buyer intends to owner-occupy the improvements as
office space for his business. Given the condition of the improvements at time of
sale they are concluded to have contributed no value to the property at time of
sale. Overall, this was an arms-length transaction with typical financing, and was
representative of market conditions at the time of sale.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 35 -
Sale No. L-2
This is the sale of a distressed property. The owner owed back taxes and had until
October 3, 2011 to sell the property or it would be seized by the municipality.
While the seller received back up offers at $285,000 he had to accept the lower
offer in order to push the sale through before the October 3rd deadline. At the
time of sale, the property was a used car lot and was improved with a small
building. The new owners indicated they would be removing the old building and
putting in a small restaurant. Therefore, the analysis price has been adjusted
upward $5,000 for the cost to remove the building, and $60,000 for conditions of
sale. An analysis price of $305,000 for the property is supported by the broker
who stated she could have sold it for $300,000 if it were not for the condition of
sale. For reference, the adjacent property owner offered $275,000 for the site in
2010.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 36 -
Sale No. L-3
This is the sale of B-3 zoned lot located at the southwest corner of East 12th Ave
and Hyder St. At the time of sale, there was an old (1959), small (300 sq ft)
residence in poor condition on the site. However, the structure did not have a
permanent foundation and was not determined to provide any additional value to
the site. This was an estate sale, as the previous owners had died. It was listed for
18 months, beginning at $16.43/sq ft then decreasing to $12.57/sq ft, before
selling at $11.14/sq ft. For reference, it sold previously in January 2009 for
$91,500 ($13.07/sq ft). Upward adjustment for conditions of sale is made at 10%,
resulting in an analysis price for the most recent transaction of $85,800 or
$12.26/sq ft.
Sale No. L-4
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 37 -
This is the sale of three adjoining lots at the northwest corner of Spenard Rd and
33rd Ave in midtown. The parcel was marketed for approximately 9 months,
beginning at $299,000 but later reduced to $249,900. It ultimately sold for
$225,000. However, this was a bankruptcy estate sale with an outside trustee
unfamiliar with Alaska, and the broker indicated this negatively impacted
marketing and, ultimately, the price. Based on discussions with the broker as well
as the reported appraised value at the time, upward adjustment of 20% is
warranted for conditions of sale, resulting in an analysis price of $270,000.
Sale No. L-5
This is the sale of a commercial site just east of Arctic Blvd on W 27th Ave, just
north of Northern Lights Boulevard. The buyer owned the lot directly west of this
lot and planned to operate an auto-detailing business on this lot. Overall, it was an
arms-length transaction reflective of market at the time.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 38 -
Sale No. L-6
This is the expired listing for a vacant lot at the southeast edge of downtown. At
the corner of Hyder Street and 14th Avenue, it is located one block away from the
heavily-trafficked 15th Avenue, Ingra Street and Gambell Street. For reference, it
sold in January 2007 for $105,000 or $15/sq ft. It has been listed on and off since
May 2007 - usually with ~6 months spacing between offerings - yet no sales have
occurred. The asking price began at $21/sq ft and ultimately decreased to
$16.41/sq ft before the listing expired again at the end of December 2015. There
was reportedly one offer of $16/sq ft several years ago, but this was withdrawn. It
is an example of the relatively low demand for vacant land in east downtown that
lacks frontage along a main thoroughfare. Moreover, the agent indicated the lot
size limited development potential to a very small building, which also made
marketing difficult.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 39 -
Sale No. L-7
This is the current listing for 6 contiguous commercial lots (half a block) on the
north side of 7th Ave between Hyder and Ingra Streets. It has been used as
parking historically. The property was listed for sale at $1,100,000 or
approximately $26/ sq ft for one year before the listing expired in January 2014.
The broker reported that there was sporadic interest, but not at the asking price.
An offer was made at approximately $15/sq ft (for retail/warehouse development),
but this was rejected. The property was re-listed at its current asking price of
$800,000 or $19/sq ft in early 2016.
Overview of Adjustments
Nature of Adjustments Adjustments to the comparables are necessary to reflect advantages and
disadvantages relative to the subject. Ideally, quantitative adjustments are
determined through paired sale analysis or other definitive data. However, when
quantitative adjustments cannot be reliably ascertained - as is often the case in
Alaskan markets due to data limitations - qualitative adjustments may be applied
through a weighted analysis of each comparable based on its relative merits.
These adjustments may be supported by available market data, discussions with
local market participants, and/or information contained within the appraiser’s
files.
Note that qualitative adjustments - based on the above as well as on appraiser
judgment - are applied on a numeric (percentage) basis in this appraisal.
Ultimately, the adjustment grid presented further in this chapter is not intended to
imply that all of the adjustments were performed on a quantitative basis. Rather,
the adjustment grid is presented to more precisely communicate the appraiser’s
opinion on the direction and degree of adjustment required to a given comparable.
Usable Land Area Non-usable areas due to topography, wetlands, overhead utilities or other issues
are subtracted from gross site area.
Property Rights When real property rights are sold the contract may include rights that are less
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 40 -
Conveyed than or more than all of the real property rights. Examples include the inclusion of
another property, personal property, or the sale of a property subject to a below
market or above market lease. Therefore, the sale price of the comparable
property must be adjusted to reflect the property rights that are similar to those
being appraised. In this analysis the comparables are adjusted to reflect the fee
simple sale price of the real property. Adjustments to the comparables are
required in cases where the property interest sold was less than or greater than the
fee simple value.
Financing Terms Seller-provided financing can play an important role in the sale of a project. Low
down payments and terms that are significantly less stringent than those available
in the market at the time of sale contribute to sale prices in excess of that
obtainable by an all-cash or typically financed (by a disinterested third party)
buyer. In order to analyze all properties on a comparable basis, those sales with
financing not typically available for the property at the time of sale must be
converted to typical terms and cash equivalency.
Conditions of Sale Adjustments for conditions of sale are intended to reflect the motivations of the
buyer and the seller. Conditions of sale that are outside the definition of market
value must be adjusted to reflect a fully marketed property with adequate exposure
and an arms-length transaction where neither the buyer nor the seller is unduly
motivated. Adjustments may be required to properties where one party was
unusually motivated, foreclosure sales, properties that were not fully exposed to
the market, and active listings that have not closed.
Market Conditions Market values have generally increased in recent years as the available supply of
substitute properties has decreased and the number of investors and users actively
seeking properties has increased. In the process of completing this assignment, or
as part of previously completed assignments for similar properties in this segment,
consideration was given to the limited available paired sales, along with rent
trends, assessment trends, MLS trends, and discussions with market participants.
Based on the available information, prices in this particular neighborhood have
essentially remained flat over the past several years. Accordingly, all of the
selected transactions are considered to be fairly reflective of the current
environment, and no market conditions adjustments are warranted in this case.
Location Location is a broad term that includes non-property specific factors such as
neighborhood and surrounding demographics and property specific factors such as
surrounding streets, street frontage, access, exposure, number of corners, traffic
counts, adjacent properties and other factors. Where appropriate adjustments for
certain components of location may be performed individually.
Size If an adequate supply of larger sites exists, then generally smaller parcels tend to
sell for higher prices per sq ft. If supply of larger parcels is limited, then they
occasionally sell for a premium. A review of data indicates that within the
subject’s market segment (specifically, midtown Anchorage), size does not have
as significant an influence on unit price as in other districts. That said, smaller
parcels do tend generally to sell for somewhat higher prices per sq ft than much
larger parcels. Accordingly, very large parcels (relative to the subject) would
warrant upward adjustment.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 41 -
Shape The shape of a parcel may impact its development potential or site configuration.
Adjustment may be warranted for parcels with a significantly different shape than
the subject.
Use / Zoning Differences in the current use or the highest and best use of a potential comparable
and the subject must be analyzed. Site development potential depends heavily on
zoning requirements. Zoning determines how large a structure and for what type
of use a site can be developed. Adjustments are required to comparables with
zoning designations that provide a lower or higher level of overall functional
utility relative to the subject’s zoning.
Other The adjustments listed above are not inclusive of all the adjustments considered by
the appraiser. Physical and economic differences where adjustments have not
been explicitly made are implicitly considered in the appraiser’s analysis of the
comparable and value estimate.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 42 -
Adjustment Grid Exhibit
Name
Date
Price
Land SF
$/Sq Ft
Property Rights Fee Simple 0.0% Fee Simple 0.0% Fee Simple 0.0% Fee Simple 0.0% Fee Simple 0.0% Fee Simple 0.0% Fee Simple 0.0%
Financing Conventional 0.0% Conventional 0.0% Conventional 0.0% Cash 0.0% Cash 0.0% Conventional 0.0%Conventional0.0%
Conditions of Sale Arms Length 0.0% Distressed/F 0.0% Motivated Se 0.0% Distressed 0.0% Arms Length 0.0% Asking -15.0%Arms Length 0.0%
Market Cond. Thru 5/16 0.0%
Location
% Adjustment
$ Adjustment
Land SF (Size)
% Adjustment
$ Adjustment
Shape
% Adjustment
$ Adjustment
Utilities
% Adjustment
$ Adjustment
Zoning
% Adjustment
$ Adjustment
Net Adjustments
Gross Adjustments
Rectangular RectangularTrapezoidalRectangularRectangular
$0.00
0%
$0.00
42,0006,9447,000
Rectangular
B-3, General
Business
15.0%
-15.0%
$19.15
-5.0%
15.0%
$13.95 $14.29
-10.0%
25.0%
-25.0%
10.0%
Adjusted Land SF Unit Price
0.0%
$22.36
0.0%
$19.05
0.0% 0.0%
$13.95
$19.05$16.48$22.58
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0%
All Available
0%
$0.00
B-3, General
Business
B-3, General
Business
0%
0%
$0.00
$0.00
$1.01
All AvailableAll Available
$0.00
B-3, General
Business
$0.00
0%
5%
0%
$0.00
RectangularRectangular
B-3, General
Business
All Available
$0.00
0%
$0.00
0%
All Available
0%
$0.00
-25.0% 0.0%
$14.83$12.26
25.0%
$16.94Adjusted Land SF Unit Price
0.0%25.0%
-25.0%
$16.77
0%
$0.00$0.00
$0.00
0%
B-3, General
Business
0%
$85,800
5/3/2016
7,000
$305,000
$12.26
6,580
- - - $22.58
11/4/2010
$70,000
$22.36
13,6433,100
Transaction Adjustments
$12.26
744 E. 12th Ave. -
2659
L-6Land Analysis Grid L-1 L-2
Former Fairview
Substation
626 Gambell St. -
1415
640 Gambell St. -
1409
12/31/201510/16/2015
3208 Spenard Rd -
2654
1401 Hyder St - 2653
$140,000
702 W 27th Ave -
2635
L-4
$114,900
L-3 L-5
636 Ingra St -
2655
$19.05
B-3, General
Business
16,383
$0.00
$0.00
0%
All Available
0%
0%
$0.00
All Available
16,383
$20.16
L-7
42,000
5/4/2016
$800,000
7,000
0%0%
-$4.76
-25%
7,0006,944
$13.95
0.0%
$20.16$16.48
$16.41
$20.16
$0.00 -$1.65 -$2.02 $0.00
0% -10% -10% 0%
Appraisal
9/1/2011
$270,000
$16.48
7/18/2013
Conventional
12/23/2014
$12.26
Arms Length
Fee Simple
0.0%
$22.36
0.0%
Adjusted Land SF Unit Price $22.58
6,580
0%0%
3,100
$0.00
-$5.65 -$5.59
-25% -25%
13,643
0%0%
$0.00
0%
0%
$0.00
$0.00 $0.00
0%
B-3, General
Business
$0.00
0%
$0.00
All available
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 43 -
Discussion & Analysis After Adjustment
The comparables bracket the physical and economic characteristics of the subject.
They bracket the market value of the subject on an unadjusted basis, and inferior
comparables were adjusted upward while superior comparables were adjusted
downward. Prior to adjustments, the sale prices fall within a relatively wide
range. After adjustments this range is narrowed, supporting the overall
reasonableness of the adjustments made. Comparables requiring a lower degree of
gross adjustment are generally the most reliable indicators of value. Comparables
requiring higher degrees of gross adjustment are generally less reliable indicators
of value, but may still be meaningful and given weight if the adjustments made
were strongly supported.
Prior to adjustment, the comparables range from $12.26/sq ft to $22.58/sq ft, with
an average of $18.47/sq ft. After adjustment, they range from $12.26/sq ft to
$19.15/sq ft, with an average of $15.45/sq ft. All of the comparables except L-4
and L-5 are located in the downtown area, although location adjustments were still
warranted in several cases. This is reasonable, given the substantial drop-off in
land values as one moves away from the central CBD - which has been
demonstrated in land sale prices over the years. Moreover, in east downtown
particularly there is a substantial pricing difference between interior parcels and
those with frontage along major thoroughfares. No adjustments are warranted for
size, shape, topography, soil conditions or utilities in this case, however.
Overall, the degree of adjustment suggests that all of the selected comparables
provide reasonable indications of value. Particular attention is paid to L-3 as it is
located in close proximity and sold relatively recently (for this market segment, at
least). The recently expired listing of L-6 is also considered a strong indicator,
after downward adjustment is applied due to it being an asking price rather than a
consummated sale. Both of these comparables are interior lots and are similar to
the subject in most other regards as well. The remaining comparables required
varying levels of downward adjustment for location, and most offered direct
frontage on well-trafficked streets (i.e. Ingra St, Gambell St, and Spenard Rd).
For additional support, several local brokers were contacted regarding land values
in this location. While opinions varied slightly, the responses of these
knowledgeable brokers was that value for an interior parcel such as this would be
most likely expected in the range of $13-$15/sq ft. Several pointed out that the
site is not especially well positioned for most retail or office uses. While clearly
anecdotal, the brokers’ feedback is given consideration in this case particularly
due to the limitations of recent sale transactions in the vicinity.
After careful consideration, based on analysis of the data presented previously as
well as data contained within the appraiser’s work file, the market value of the
subject site is estimated towards the lower middle of the range at $14.00/sq ft.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 44 -
Fee Simple Land Value Calculation
FEE SIMPLE LAND VALUE CALCULATION
Usable Land Area 6,580
Land Value / Sq Ft $14.00
Estimated Land Value $92,120
Rounded $92,000
Ground Rent Analysis
Overview The Client has requested an estimate or market rent for the vacant site. In the
local area, direct rental comparison is not typically used by market participants to
set ground rent. Instead, a specified rate of return – most commonly between 7%
and 9% - is applied to the underlying fee simple site value, resulting in annual
ground rent on a fully triple net (NNN) basis. This is the common methodology
for new ground leases in the area, as well as periodic rent adjustments at existing
ground leased properties (with the adjustments most often being made at 5-year
intervals). It is employed by all of the major ground-lessors in this market,
including the Alaska Railroad Corporation, Calais Company, and Alaska Pacific
University.
Ground Lease Returns The following information summarizes typical annual ground rent rates, as a
percentage of fee simple land value. These rates are form the basis of calculating
market ground rent for the subject.
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 45 -
STANDARD LAND LEASE RATES
Lessor Type Low High Typical
Calais Ground Lease Private 6.7% 9.0% 8.0%
White Pass Railroad Private - - 8.0%
Tlingit/Haida Central Council Private - - 8.0%
Ounalashka Corporation Private 8.0% 11.0% 10.0%
Alaska Pacific University Private 8.0% 8.0% 8.0%
Alaska Railroad (Standard) Quasi Private 8.0% 10.0% 8.0%
Alaska Railroad (Water & Comm.) Quasi Private - - 9.0%
Petersburg City 6.0% 10.0% 8.0%
Sitka City 8.0% 10.0% 9.0%
Juneau City 8.0% 10.0% 9.0%
Craig City - - 8.0%
Haines City - - 8.0%
Klawock City - - 8.0%
Kenai City - - 8.0%
Seward City - - 8.0%
University of Alaska State - - 10.0%
SOA - Dept. of Natural Resources State - - 8.0%
State of Alaska State 8.0% 9.0% 8.5%
Bureau of Land Management Federal - - 8.0%
Department of Justice Federal 8.0% 12.0% 9.0%
Low 6.0%
Average 8.4%
High 12.0%
Ann. Rent as % of F.S. Value
The vast majority of ground leases in the subject’s market area are based on an 8%
annual return rate. That said, many of the leases have been in place for decades,
with far less activity occurring recently. Of the new leases created during the past
decade, most have been at 8% as well, but two are known to have been done at a
lower initial rate (around 7%) to encourage development. Given this information,
a reasonable rate of return in the current environment is concluded at 7.5%.
Applying this rate to the previously reconciled fee simple value for the subject,
annual ground rent is calculated as shown below.
MARKET GROUND RENT CALCULATION
Estimated Land Value $92,000
Concluded Ground Lease Rate 7.5%
Market Rent (Annual) $6,900
Former Fairview Substation Land Valuation
16-0380
Page - 46 -
Final Value Estimate
FINAL MARKET RENT ESTIMATE
Former Fairview Substation
Property Rights Fee Simple
Condition As Is
Effective Date of Appraisal May 3, 2016
Lease Area Size 6,580 Sq Ft
Rent Escalations Mkt. Adj. / 5Yrs
Tenant Expenses NNN
Final Market Rent Estimate $6,900/Yr.
Exposure Period
As reflected by the local sales, properties were marketed for anywhere from just
a few months to several years before offers were obtained. Other land sales,
although not included as comparables for this specific appraisal, were typically
marketed for up to 12 months. At the concluded market value, a reasonable
exposure period of 12 months is concluded.
Marketing Time
Based on current market trends, a reasonable marketing time should be similar
to the exposure period. For a property of this type and size, in this
neighborhood, and given expected market conditions, a reasonable marketing
time would be up to 12 months. Note that it may be inappropriate for the Client
to assume value remains stable during the estimated marketing period.
Former Fairview Substation General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
16-0380
Page - 47 -
General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
1. Applicable to All Assignments: Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, the following General
Assumptions & Limiting Conditions apply to all assignments:
2. Acceptance of Report/Limit of Liability: The client’s acceptance and/or use of this report also
establishes the complete acceptance of all contingencies, assumptions, limiting conditions, etc., as stated
within the report. The client is responsible to become familiar with these assumptions and limiting
conditions. If placed in the possession of anyone other than the client, the client shall make such party
aware of these assumptions and limiting conditions. The appraiser(s) assume no liability for the client or
third party’s lack of familiarization and comprehension of the same. The appraiser(s) has no
responsibility or liability to correct any deficiencies of any type in the property, or any costs incurred to
correct such deficiencies whether legal, physical, or financial.
3. Responsibility of Client/Intended User to Accurately Communicate Appraisal Results: If placed in
the possession of anyone other than the client or intended user, they shall make such party aware of these
assumptions and limiting conditions. The appraiser(s) assume no liability for the client or third party’s
lack of familiarization and comprehension of the same. The appraiser(s) has no responsibility or liability
to correct any deficiencies of any type in the property, or any costs incurred to correct such deficiencies
whether legal, physical, or financial.
4. Post Appraisal Services: The contract for appraisal, consultation, or other service is fulfilled upon
completion of the assignment. The appraiser(s) or others assisting in this report will not be required to
provide testimony in court or other hearing, and will not participate in post appraisal services other than
routine questions with the client or third parties so designated by the client without a separate engagement
and for an additional fee. If testimony or deposition is required due to subpoena, the client shall become
responsible for the incursion of fees and charges for any additional time, regardless of the party.
5. Duplication and Dissemination of Report or Report Contents: This appraisal has been completed for
the client’s specific use as well as any other intended user(s) specifically identified in the report. The
appraiser(s) has no liability, accountability, or obligation to any other third party. The appraiser(s) retain
copyright of the data, discussions, and conclusions contained herein. Possession of this report does not
constitute the right of publication either in whole or in part. The client may only disseminate complete
final copies to third parties engaged in the course of underwriting and loan securitization, as well as to
any other intended user(s) identified in the report. Duplication and dissemination of selected sections of
this report to third parties without express written consent of the signatories of the report are prohibited
and may be misleading. This report in whole or in part may not be distributed to the general public by
use of advertising media, public relations, new outlets, etc. without the written consent of the signatories.
Exemptions from this restriction include duplication for the client’s internal use, dissemination to
accountants, attorneys, or advisors of the client. The exemption also extends to any court, governmental
authority, or regulatory agency that has jurisdiction or subpoena power over the individuals or parties for
whom the appraisal has been prepared or for ethics enforcement, provided that the report will not be
published in whole or in part in any public document or medium. This report shall not be advertised to
the public to make a “sale” or any “security” as defined by the Securities Act of 1933.
6. Appraisal Institute Use Restrictions: Disclosure of the contents of this appraisal report is governed by
the By-Laws & Regulations of the Appraisal Institute. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this
report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraisers or the firm with which they
are connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or to the MAI designation) shall be disseminated
to the public through advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media or any other
public means of communication without the prior written consent and approval of the undersigned. No
part of this report or any of the conclusions may be included in any offering statement, memorandum,
Gen
eral
Ass
um
pti
on
s &
Lim
itin
g C
on
dit
ion
s
Former Fairview Substation General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
16-0380
Page - 48 -
prospectus or registration without the prior written consent of the appraisers.
7. Unauthorized User: The report has been prepared for the client and any other intended user(s)
specifically identified in the report, within the context of the intended use only. The appraiser(s) has no
liability to any other third party. Any authorized user of this document who provides a copy of this
document to, or permits reliance thereon by, any person or entity not authorized by Reliant, LLC in
writing to use or rely thereon, hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Reliant, LLC, its affiliates and their
respective shareholders, directors, officers, and employee’s harmless from and against all damages,
expenses, claims and costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred in investigating and defending any claim
arising from or in any way connected to the use of, or reliance upon, the document by any such
unauthorized person or entity. Such unauthorized distributor accepts all liability to the unauthorized user
whom they distribute a copy of the report to. Any unauthorized distributor of this report is cautioned that
they may incur liabilities to the unauthorized user that they are providing a copy of the report to as well as
to Reliant LLC.
8. Reliability of Information Used: Through the course of this assignment the appraiser(s) collected data
from numerous sources deemed reliable, but not guaranteed. No liability is assumed for the inaccuracies
of data supplied by the various sources either public or private. Data relied upon in this report has been
confirmed with primary or secondary sources considered reliable and/or reasonable, and appropriate for
inclusion in the analysis. Although there were no reasons to doubt the general accuracy of such data,
unimpeachable verification or affidavits of all data is an impractical and an uneconomic expenditure of
time and resources and/or may involve legal or confidentiality issues.
9. Right to Amend Report: The appraiser(s) reserves the right to amend, modify, alter, or correct any and
all statements, analyses, and conclusions of the value indications in the event that incorrect data was
supplied, withheld, altered, or that any other pertinent data unknown, not disclosed, or revealed to the
appraiser(s), whether intentionally or unintentionally, during the course of this assignment subsequently
becomes available. Examples of such data that could impact the opinions of market value include but are
not limited to: street addresses, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers, site area, site dimensions, gross building
area, net rentable area, usable area, common area, number of units, number of room, rent rolls, historical
operating statements and budgets, sales data, etc.
10. Purchase and Sale Agreement: In the event of a pending sale, as of the report date, any purchase and
sale agreement (PSA, EMA, etc.) provided has been represented as being the final agreed upon document
reflecting the final price and terms negotiated between the parties. This information reflects the
perspective of a buyer and seller, and so may have been given significant weight in the final conclusion of
market value. In the event that the sale information provided subsequently turns out not to represent the
final agreed upon price and/or terms, or in the event that the price and/or terms are amended post-delivery
of this report, the market value estimate contained herein may be invalidated. The intended user(s) of this
report is advised not to rely upon it in this situation until the appraiser is provided the final/amended sale
information for their full consideration and possible amendment to the opinions and conclusions
originally stated in this report.
11. Obligation of User to Report Errors: Any authorized user is required immediately contact the
appraiser(s) and report errors, discrepancies, or alterations to the proposed properties or land parcels to
determine the impact on the opinion(s) of market value.
12. Integrated Analysis. The individual components of the analysis contained herein are highly interrelated
and subject-specific. As such, individual items such as rent, vacancy allowance, expenses, and rate of
return cannot be viewed individually without the context of the whole analysis. Moreover, conclusions or
individual components from this specific analysis cannot and should not be extracted for application to
other properties and/or situations.
13. Market Dynamic and Valuation Fluctuations: The opinions of market value expressed within the
report are subject to change over time as a result of market dynamics. Market values are highly
Former Fairview Substation General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
16-0380
Page - 49 -
susceptible to both macro and micro economic forces that influence the property. Such forces include but
are not limited to: exposure on the market, length of time, marketing efforts, motivations and preferences
of market participants, productivity of the property, the property’s market appeal, changes in investor
requirements regarding income and yields, etc. The opinions of market value are made as of the report
date and subject to fluctuations over time as a result of natural market forces.
14. Date of Value, Dollar Values, and Purchasing Power: The date of the report and the effective date of
the market value opinions are stated in the letter of transmittal or with the appropriate sections of the
report. All dollar amounts are based on the purchasing power of the United States Dollar (USD). The
analyses and conclusions of the appraisal are based upon the known market conditions as of the date of
report. Changes in market conditions or purchasing power may warrant a new appraisal assignment. The
appraiser(s) is available for consultations regarding changes in the economic conditions.
15. Fixtures, Furniture, and Equipment (FF&E) and Business Concerns: Personal property, FF&E,
intangibles, going concerns, etc., unless specifically stated as a component of the real estate, are excluded
from the market value estimates.
16. Non-Viewed Units/Spaces: In certain instances, due to current occupancy or lack of access, portions of
the subject’s units/spaces are not available to be viewed during the walk through. Unless otherwise stated
in the report, in these cases the person accompanying the appraiser on the walk through has represented
that the condition and quality of these units/spaces are similar to that of the property (viewed areas) as a
whole. It is a general assumption of this assignment that the units/spaces that were not viewed are
commensurate condition and quality with those viewed by the appraiser during the walk through.
17. Proposed Improvements, Renovations, and Repairs: For the purposes of this analysis, the proposed
improvements, renovations, and/or repairs are presumed to be completed in a workman-like manner, and
according to the detail, plans, and specifications supplied to the appraiser(s). The market value opinions
for such construction, renovations, and repairs are subject to an inspection of the improvements to
determine completion as per plans and specifications.
18. Date of Completion Value: The actual delivery date of proposed product may vary widely from the
anticipated date of delivery due to weather and other variables. If proposed or under construction, it is an
ordinary assumption of this assignment that the subject is completed as of the at completion date, which
has been developed based on discussions with ownership, contractors, architects and typical market
derived construction deliveries.
19. Limitations of Competency: The appraiser is competent in the valuation of real estate, which is a subset
of the field of economics. The appraiser is not competent in the fields of law, engineering, construction,
architecture, surveying or other areas of expertise. Clients bear the responsibility of consulting and
retaining experts outside the appraisal profession as required by the situation.
20. Lease Verification / Validation: Where applicable, the scope of lease verification was generally limited
to their economic characteristics and legal aspects of the leases were not reviewed or analyzed. It is
assumed that all of the leases are valid, legally binding documents.
21. Divisions or Fractional Interests: The opinions of market value apply to the entire property unless
specifically identified and established within the conclusions and analyses of the report. Division of
fractional interests by the client or third party will render this report invalid.
22. Component Values: The distribution of total valuation between the land and the building improvements
in this report are applicable only under the existing program or utilization of the property. The
component values between land and building are not intended, nor are they to be used in conjunction with
any other appraisal assignment, and are rendered invalid if used.
23. Survey: Site plans, sketches, or other illustrations are not surveys unless specifically identified as an
exhibit from a licensed survey. Surveys of the site boundaries were not completed, nor does the
Former Fairview Substation General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
16-0380
Page - 50 -
appraiser(s) imply such expertise. Dimensions and areas of the site were obtained from sources deemed
reliable but not guaranteed. Additionally, it is further assumed that no encroachments exist.
24. Exhibits: Maps, plats, sketches, photographs, and other exhibits are intended for illustration,
visualization, and assistance in describing and analyzing the property in full context. Such exhibits may
not be removed, reproduced, or separately used beyond this report.
25. Building Area: Reliant, LLC makes no warranty or certification relating to building area. In instances
when building area is not provided and is either partially or entirely unknown the appraiser may be
required to measure the property to provide an indication of building area. Measurements by the
appraiser may be made onsite or be made from property drawings, sketches, or actual architectural plans.
The user(s) of this assignment are cautioned not to view the appraisers building area estimate as having
the same degree of accuracy as a building area study performed by an appropriately qualified/certified
individual such as an architect or engineer and are recommended to engage such individuals for this type
of information.
26. Clear Title: It is specifically assumed, unless otherwise indicated, that the title to the property is clear
and marketable, that there are no recorded, unrecorded, or potential liens, defaults, encumbrances, etc.
that would adversely affect the marketability and transfer of ownership. Unless otherwise stated, all
applicable property taxes are assumed to be paid current. The appraiser(s) does not imply expertise in
determining defects in the title, nor has the appraiser(s) been informed of such adversities. Specific
questions regarding the title, including title insurance should be directed to a well qualified real estate title
company. The legal description provided by title report, surveyor, government records, etc. is assumed to
be correct.
27. Subsurface Rights, Avigation Easements, and Transferable Development Rights (TDR’s): The
market value opinion(s) specifically assume that there are no mineral deposit rights or other subsurface
rights, avigation easements, or transferable development rights associated with the property unless
explicitly stated within the report.
28. Private Deed Restrictions: The appraiser(s) makes the explicit assumption that there are no private deed
restrictions that in any way limit the use of the subject property.
29. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The ADA became effective on January 26, 1992. The
appraiser(s) does not imply expertise in the interpretation of the ADA, nor has a compliance survey been
completed. The potential exists that if a compliance survey is completed combined with a detailed
analysis of the ADA requirements, deficiencies may be revealed that could adversely impact the market
value conclusion(s). No specific information regarding any non-compliance issues have been provided to
the appraiser(s) and the possibility of non-compliance was not considered in the developing the opinions
of value contained herein. Specific compliance questions should be directed to the appropriate governing
jurisdictional agency.
30. Zoning Ordinances: It is assumed that no changes to the current zoning code/ordinances or other
regulations regarding the use of the property, density of development, construction components and/or
quality of components, etc. are imminent or under consideration by the jurisdictional governing body,
unless otherwise noted in the report. The property is appraised under the assumption that the
improvements are approved, that certificates of occupancy or permits have been or will be issued, and
that all other applicable national, state, local, or other administrative requirements have successfully been,
or will be obtained or renewed for any use considered in the opinion(s) of market value.
31. Adverse Governmental Controls: Unless otherwise stated, the appraiser(s) is unaware of any
governmental controls on the property, public initiative issues, rent or price controls, or any other adverse
governmental or public controls contemplated regarding the legal use of the property.
32. Property Compliance: The appraiser(s) expresses no opinions or warranties that may require legal
expertise or specialized investigations beyond the methods and investigations typically employed by real
Former Fairview Substation General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
16-0380
Page - 51 -
estate appraisers. Market value opinion(s) and conclusions contained within the report assume that the
property is compliant with all environmental and government regulations such as building permits, fire
department approvals, occupancy permits, building codes, licenses, etc. If the appraiser(s) has not been
supplied with a termite inspection, occupancy permit, etc., no responsibility or representation is assumed
for correction costs associated with obtained those items or deficiencies discovered before or after they
were obtained. The appraiser(s) assumes no responsibility for costs incurred to obtain flood hazard
determination, flood hazard insurance, or consequences arising for failure to obtain flood hazard
insurance. Although the appraiser(s) has searched publicly available FEMA maps, a flood certification
should be obtained from a qualified agent for the Federal Flood Insurance Program.
33. Structural Integrity and System Components: No advice or warranty of any kind are expressed or
implied regarding the condition or adequacy of the mechanical systems, structural integrity of the
improvements, soils, settlements, drainage, or other factors regarding the integrity and adequacy of the
component systems of the improvements. The appraiser(s) is not a qualified engineer, nor is expertise
implied with respect to engineering matters. Client may desire to retain the services of a qualified
licensed contractor, civil engineer, structural engineer, architect, or other expert in determining the
quality, condition, and adequacy of the improvements prior to the disbursement of funds. It is assumed
that the existing improvements are structurally sound and constructed to the applicable federal, state, and
local building codes and ordinances. That assumption includes, but is not limited to: the superstructure,
roofing, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, HVAC, elevator, etc. The opinion(s) of market value are based
upon no hidden or unapparent adverse conditions of the improvements, the site, or the subsoil, which
would cause a loss in value. No responsibility or liability is assumed for any adverse conditions or for the
expertise and retention of experts in discovery, detection, and cost to cure. In the event that professional
consultations or reports reveal negative factors that would create a loss in value, the appraiser(s) reserves
the right to amend the opinion(s) of market value and other conclusions contained herein.
34. Environmental Hazards: Unless specifically stated, the appraiser(s) has no knowledge regarding the
presence or absence of toxic materials including but not limited to: asbestos, urea-formaldehyde
insulation, leaking underground storage tanks, contaminated groundwater, or other potentially hazardous
materials and substances that would adversely affect the market value and marketability of the property.
The appraiser(s) does not imply expertise and no liability is assumed for the detection or remediation of
such materials or substances, whether above or below the ground surface. Although a perfunctory
observation was made during the walk-through, the client is referred to an environmental expert for
further details, if so desired. If environmental hazards are discovered, the market value opinion(s) may be
negatively affected, requiring a re-appraisal of the property for an additional fee.
35. Environmental Compliance: Unless otherwise noted, the appraiser(s) makes the assumption that the
property is in compliance with all applicable national, state, or local environmental regulations.
36. Competent Property Management: It is assumed that the subject property analyzed currently is, or will
be under efficient and competent management and that said management is not, or will not be, inefficient
or super-efficient.
37. Ongoing Operations. In the event that the subject is a special purpose property or going concern,
ongoing business operations are assumed unless otherwise stated in the body of the report.
38. Financial Documentation: Historic income and expenses may have been provided by ownership, a
lender, property manager, real estate agent or other third party. The financial information is assumed to
reflect actual income and expenses at the subject using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP). This information is assumed to be accurate and it has not been audited in any way.
39. Cash Flow Projections: The cash flow projections presented in this report are forecasts of future
performance characteristics based upon the macro and micro economic data detailed in the analysis. The
income, vacancy, expenses, and general economic conditions presented are not to be construed as
predictions of the future, but rather reasonable expectations of future performance based on market
Former Fairview Substation General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
16-0380
Page - 52 -
modeling practices. Unless otherwise stated, the cash flow modeling is intended to reflect the opinions
and practices of market participants and is not the analyst’s forecast of what will actually occur. Actual
results will vary, and are affected by fluctuating economic conditions and efficiency of management. The
appraiser makes no warranty, express or implied, that the forecasts will occur as outlined. Additionally,
future economic projections may be adversely affected by unforeseen circumstances and economic
repercussions beyond the realm of knowledge or control, such as the events of September 11, 2001.
40. Asset Recommendations and Consultations: Asset Recommendations and Consultations: No
statements contained within the report shall constitute recommendations with regard to any decision by
the client(s) or intended user(s) with respect to prospective underwriting, financing, acquisition,
disposition, holding of the asset, or any other subsequent event, at the stated market value indication(s) or
otherwise. If the client requests a recommendation with respect to such a decision, it should be requested
in writing, be explicitly listed in the scope of work and explicitly addressed in the appraisal report. Such
decisions warrant significant research and strategy, with specific investment questions requiring
additional consultations and financial analysis. Any client or intended user should consider this
document as only one factor together with its independent investment considerations and underwriting
criteria, in its overall investment decision. The assignment is not intended to be either a positive or a
negative indication, nor endorsement, of the soundness of an investment or underwriting decision.
41. Agreement to Mediation and Binding Arbitration: If a dispute arises out of or relates to this
assignment and if the dispute cannot be settled through negotiation, the parties agree first to try in good
faith to settle the dispute by mediation administered by the American Arbitration Association under its
applicable procedures. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this assignment that cannot
be resolved through said mediation shall be settled by binding arbitration administered by the American
Arbitration Association under its applicable rules and binding judgment on the award rendered by the
arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
42. Property Specific Assumptions, Limiting Conditions and Hypothetical Conditions: The user is
directed to the Assignment Overview section of this report for a listing of Extraordinary Assumptions and
Hypothetical Conditions specific to this assignment. The user is specifically cautioned to understand
each of the items listed and their impact on the property and scope of this assignment.
43. Dissemination to Assessor: The user(s) of this report may not provide a copy of this appraisal to any
assessment office or agency without the prior written consent of Reliant LLC, as redaction of certain
market and/or property level information may be required prior to submission for confidentiality reasons.
44. Duration (Term) of Assignment Reliance: The period of time that an assignment remains appropriate
for the client and intended user(s) intended use, including the factual conditions that form the premise of
the assignment, the research, data, analysis and conclusions, are dependent on a variety of factors
including the intended users, intended use, changes in market conditions, legal/regulatory/statutory
requirements, property specific conditions and other factors. This assignment shall not be relied upon by
the Client or intended user(s) after a period of thirty six (36) months from the earlier date of either A)
assignment delivery, which is most commonly the date of report, or B) an invoice is submitted to the
Client.
45. Duration (Term) of Assignment Validity & Reliant Liability: The assignment is valid only as of the
effective date. The applicability of the assignment for the intended use is a function of a variety of
factors, including the degree of changes in market and property conditions. However, the market/subject
factual information, analysis and conclusions, or any other aspect of the assignment, are valid for a period
no greater than thirty six (36) months from the earlier date of either A) assignment delivery, which is
most commonly the date of report, or B) an invoice is submitted to the Client. The assignment may only
be relied upon by the Client(s) or Intended User(s) for this specified period of time and Reliant shall have
no liability under this agreement to the Client, intended user(s) or any other party after this specified
period of time.
Former Fairview Substation General Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
16-0380
Page - 53 -
46. Resolution of Violations & Deficiencies: Any violations or deficiencies resolved under the terms of this
agreement shall remain confidential between Reliant LLC and the Client, intended user(s) and reviewers.
Except as provided under this agreement, the Client, Intended User(s) or reviewers agree not to submit
the assignment to any applicable private or governmental body with jurisdiction over the matter. If any
aspect of the assignment is determined by the Client, intended user(s) or their reviewers, to not meet the
minimum standards of any applicable Local, State or Federal laws, including the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) the Client or intended user(s) agree to not submit the
assignment or individuals performing the assignment to any governing Local, State or Federal authorities
or any private entity with jurisdiction without first 1) notifying Reliant LLC of the violations and 2)
providing Reliant LLC an opportunity to correct and address any deficiencies that may exist. In the event
that Reliant LLC fully addresses any deficiencies to the satisfaction of the Client, intended user(s) or their
reviewers, these Parties agree that no further action shall be taken. If, however, that the Client, intended
user(s) or their reviewers do not believe that the issues have been fully resolved, Reliant LLC shall
engage a third party expert of their choice to perform a professional review of the assignment. If that
third party reviewer determines that the alleged issues have been resolved, the Client, intended user(s) or
reviewers shall be responsible for the fee to that third party reviewer. If, however, the third party
reviewer determines that the alleged issues have not been resolved, Reliant LLC shall have the
opportunity to correct and address any deficiencies that may exist and is responsible for the fee to the
third party reviewer. If, however, such issues are not fully addressed by Reliant LLC to the satisfaction
of the third party reviewer, the Client, intended user(s) or their reviewers are released from the
confidentiality requirement of this agreement and may submit the assignment to any applicable private or
governmental body with jurisdiction over the matter.
47. Unauthorized Third Party Liability to Reliant LLC for False Accusation: The assignment is a
private contract between Reliant LLC and the Client and intended user(s). Subject to the terms of this
agreement, only the Client or intended user are permitted to submit this document to any applicable
private or governmental body with jurisdiction over the matter without incurring any liability to Reliant
LLC and the signatories of the assignment for false accusation, misrepresentation, slander or libel. In the
event that the signatories of this assignment are found not to be in violation of any applicable governing
regulations, any unauthorized third party that makes false accusations or submits this assignment to any
applicable private or governmental body with jurisdiction over the matter accepts liability to Reliant LLC
for attorney’s fees incurred in their defense, lost income, damages to reputation of the signatories and
firm and any and all other sources of economic damage that may result directly or indirectly from their
said actions.
48. Data Utilization: The market and comparable data developed by the appraiser and presented in this
report is being provided to the Client and Intended User(s) only within the context of this specific
assignment. The Client and Intended User(s) are prohibited from distributing, disseminating, selling or
otherwise profiting from this data outside the context of this assignment. The Client and Intended User(s)
are, however, permitted to utilize this data strictly for their own internal purposes.
Former Fairview Substation Terms & Definitions
16-0380
Page - 55 -
Terms & Definitions
As Is Value5 The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use
and zoning as of the appraisal date.
Prospective Value6 A value opinion effective as of a specified future date. The term does not define a type
of value. Instead, it identifies a value opinion as being effective at some specific future
date. An opinion of value as of a prospective date is frequently sought in connection
with projects that are proposed, under construction, or under conversion to a new use,
or those that have not yet achieved sellout or a stabilized level of long-term
occupancy.
Retrospective Value7 A value opinion effective as of a specified historical date. The term retrospective does
not define a type of value. Instead, it identifies a value opinion as being effective at
some specific prior date. Value as of a historical date is frequently sought in
connection with property tax appeals, damage models, lease renegotiation, deficiency
judgments, estate tax, and condemnation. Inclusion of the type of value with this term
is appropriate, e.g., “retrospective market value opinion.”
At Completion Value8 The market value at the effective date construction is completed or the certificate of
occupancy is issued.
At Stabilization Value9 The concept of value at stabilization is based on stabilized occupancy. Stabilized
occupancy is defined as occupancy at that point in time when abnormalities in supply
and demand or any additional transitory conditions cease to exist and the existing
conditions are those expected to continue over the economic life of the property.
Aggregate of Retail
Values / Sum of Retail
Values10
The sum of the separate and distinct market value opinions for each of the units in a
condominium, subdivision development, or portfolio of properties, as of the date of
valuation. The aggregate of retail values does not represent the value of all the units
as though sold together in a single transaction; it is simply the total of the individual
market value conclusions. Also called the aggregate of the retail values or aggregate
retail selling price.
Value in Use (Use
Value)11
The value of a specific property for a specific use.
Business Value12 The market value of a going concern, including real estate, personal property, and the
intangible assets of the business.
Going Concern
Value13
An outdated label for the market value of all the tangible and intangible assets of an
established and operating business with an indefinite life, as if sold in aggregate;
5 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition, Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 6 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition, Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 7 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 8 Source: The Appraisal of Real Estate, Fourteenth Edition, Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2013. 9 Source: The Appraisal of Real Estate, Fourteenth Edition, Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2013. 10 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 11 Source: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency under 12 CFR, Part 34, Subpart C-Appraisals, 34.42
Definitions [f]. 12 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 13 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015.
Ter
ms
& D
efin
itio
ns
Former Fairview Substation Terms & Definitions
16-0380
Page - 56 -
more accurately termed the market value of the going concern or market value of the
total assets of the business.
Client14 The party or parties who engage, by employment or contract, an appraiser in a
specific assignment.
Intended Use15 The use or uses of an appraiser’s reported appraisal or appraisal review assignment
opinions and conclusions, as identified by the appraiser based on communication with
the client at the time of the assignment.
Intended User16 The client and any other party as identified, by name or type, as users of the appraisal
or appraisal review report by the appraiser on the basis of communication with the
client at the time of the assignment.
Fee Simple Estate17 Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the
limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police
power, and escheat.
Leased Fee Interest18 The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the right to receive the
contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires.
Leasehold Interest19 The right held by the lessee to use and occupy real estate for a stated term and under
the conditions specified in the lease.
Real Property20 An interest or interests in real estate.
Personal Property21 The interests, benefits, and rights inherent in the ownership of tangible objects that
are considered by the public as being personal; also called tangible personal
property.
Fixture22 An article that was once personal property but has since been installed or attached to
the land or building in a rather permanent manner so that it is regarded in law as part
of the real estate.
Intangible Property23 Nonphysical assets, including but not limited to franchises, trademarks, patents,
copyrights, goodwill, equities, securities, and contracts as distinguished from physical
assets such as facilities and equipment.
Extraordinary
Assumption24
An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, as of the effective date of the
assignment results, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or
conclusions.
14 Source: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice 2016-2017 Edition, The Appraisal Foundation. 15 Source: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice 2016-2017 Edition, The Appraisal Foundation. 16 Source: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice 2016-2017 Edition, The Appraisal Foundation. 17 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 18 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 19 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 20 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 21 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 22 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 23 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 24 Source: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice 2016-2017 Edition, The Appraisal Foundation.
Former Fairview Substation Terms & Definitions
16-0380
Page - 57 -
Hypothetical
Condition25
A condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is
known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is
used for the purpose of analysis.
Gross Building Area26 Total floor area of a building, excluding unenclosed areas, measured from the exterior
of the walls of the above-grade area. This includes mezzanines and basements if and
when typically included in the market area of the type of property involved.
Rentable Area27 For office or retail buildings, the tenant’s pro rata portion of the entire office floor,
excluding elements of the building that penetrate through the floor to the areas below.
The rentable area of a floor is computed by measuring to the inside finished surface of
the dominant portion of the permanent building walls, excluding any major vertical
penetrations of the floor. Alternatively, the amount of space on which the rent is
based; calculated according to local practice.
Usable Area28 For office buildings, the actual occupiable area of a floor or an office space;
computed by measuring from the finished surface of the office side of corridor and
other permanent walls, to the center of partitions that separate the office from
adjoining usable areas, and to the inside finished surface of the dominant portion of
the permanent outer building walls. Sometimes called net building area or net floor
area.
Gross Leasable Area29 Total floor area designed for the occupancy and exclusive use of tenants, including
basements and mezzanines; measured from the center of joint partitioning to the
outside wall surfaces.
Tidelands Lands that lie below the mean high watermark. These include lands that are awash by
normal tidal flows and submerged lands below the mean low watermark.
Upland30 A piece of land that abuts a parcel with riparian rights; describes an owner once
removed from a water right by a riparian owner.
Special Purpose
Property31
A property with a unique physical design, special construction materials, or a layout
that particularly adapts its utility to the use for which it was built; also called a
special design property.
Excess Land32 Land that is not needed to serve or support the existing use. The highest and best use
of the excess land may or may not be the same as the highest and best use of the
improved parcel. Excess land has the potential to be sold separately and is valued
separately.
Surplus Land33 Land that is not currently needed to support the existing use but cannot be separated
from the property and sold off for another use. Surplus land does not have an
independent highest and best use and may or may not contribute value to the improved
25 Source: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice 2016-2017 Edition, The Appraisal Foundation. 26 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 27 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 28 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 29 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 30 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 31 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 32 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 33 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015.
Former Fairview Substation Terms & Definitions
16-0380
Page - 58 -
parcel.
Depreciation34 In appraisal, a loss in property value from any cause; the difference between the cost
of an improvement on the effective date of the appraisal and the market value of the
improvement on the same date.
Entrepreneurial Profit
(Developer’s Margin)35
A market-derived figure that represents the amount an entrepreneur receives for his or
her contribution to a project and risk; the difference between the total cost of a
property (cost of development) and its market value (property value after completion),
which represents the entrepreneur’s compensation for the risk and expertise
associated with development. An entrepreneur is motivated by the prospect of future
value enhancement (i.e., the entrepreneurial incentive). An entrepreneur who
successfully creates value through new development, expansion, renovation, or an
innovative change of use is rewarded by entrepreneurial profit. Entrepreneurs may
also fail and suffer losses.
Market Rent36 The most probable rent that a property should bring in a competitive and open market
reflecting the conditions and restrictions of a specified lease agreement, including the
rental adjustment and revaluation, permitted uses, use restrictions, expense
obligations, term, concessions, renewal and purchase options, and tenant
improvements (TIs).
Exposure Time37 The estimated length of time that the property interest being appraised would have
been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market
value on the effective date of the appraisal. Comment: Exposure time is a
retrospective opinion based on an analysis of past events assuming a competitive and
open market.
Marketing Time38 An opinion of the amount of time it might take to sell a real or personal property
interest at the concluded market value level during the period immediately after the
effective date of an appraisal. Marketing time differs from exposure time, which is
always presumed to precede the effective date of an appraisal.
34 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 35 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 36 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition, Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 37 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015. 38 Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition. Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015.
Former Fairview Substation Addendum: Letter of Engagement
16-0380
Page - 59 -
Addendum: Letter of Engagement
Ad
den
du
m:
Lett
er o
f E
ngagem
ent
Former Fairview Substation Addendum: Experience Data
16-0380
Page - 61 -
Addendum: Experience Data
Ad
den
du
m:
Exp
erie
nce
Data
Theodore S. Jensen, MAI
9330 Vanguard Dr., Suite 201
Anchorage AK, 99507
P: 907.341.2230 F: 907.929.2260 Email: ted@reliantadvisory.com
Theodore S. Jensen, MAI
Managing Member
Background
Mr. Jensen has an extensive background in commercial real estate
appraisal and consulting. He has analyzed all common property types
as well as numerous special purpose properties throughout the State.
Operating primarily in Anchorage, Fairbanks and the Mat-Su Valley,
he has also appraised real estate in outlying areas, from King Cove to
Wrangell. Mr. Jensen is well acquainted with complex appraisal
situations such as government subsidized affordable housing,
proposed construction, underlying ground leases, and “go dark”
analyses. Beyond valuation, his real estate skills and knowledge
make him well suited for market research and analysis, feasibility
studies, property tax appeals, due diligence, site selection,
purchase/sale consultation, and risk assessment.
An Alaskan resident since 1992, Mr. Jensen graduated from the
University of Alaska Anchorage with Bachelor of Arts degrees in
both Economics and Criminal Justice in 1995. Since earning his
degrees, he has been active as both a private commercial appraiser
and, for several years, as a public appraiser with the Municipality of
Anchorage Assessor’s office.
Education
Real Estate Education Advanced Applications, AI
Advanced Income
Capitalization, AI
Advanced Sales
Comparison and Cost
Approaches, AI
Highest and Best Use
Market Analysis, AI
7-Hour USPAP Update
(current), AI
Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP), AI
Business Practices and
Ethics, AI
Uniform Appraisal
Report Writing and Valuation
Analysis, AI
General Applications, AI
Basic Income Capitalization,
AI
Appraisal Principles, AI
Appraisal Procedures, AI
Subdivision Valuation, AI
Fundamentals of Separating
Real Property, Personal
Property and Intangible
Business Assets, AI
Forecasting Revenue, AI
Appraisal of Land, IAAO
Advanced Income Approach
Th
eod
ore
S.
Jen
sen
, M
AI
Theodore S. Jensen, MAI
9330 Vanguard Dr., Suite 201
Anchorage AK, 99507
P: 907.341.2230 F: 907.929.2260 Email: ted@reliantadvisory.com
Standards for Federal Land
Acquisitions, AI
The Appraiser as an Expert
Witness: Preparation &
Testimony, AI
Litigation Appraising:
Specialized Topics and
Applications, AI
to Valuation, IAAO
Fundamentals of Mass
Appraisal, IAAO
Supervisory Appraiser /
Trainee Appraiser Course, AI
Review Theory – General, AI
College Education A.A., Business Administration, Frederick Community College
B.A., Economics, University of Alaska Anchorage
B.A., Criminal Justice, University of Alaska Anchorage
Employment History
Reliant, LLC (formerly
Integrated Realty Resources)
Managing Member, 2008 to Present, Anchorage, Alaska.
Howard and Wing Commercial Appraiser, 2000 to 2008, Anchorage, Alaska.
Municipality of Anchorage Senior Commercial Appraiser, 1998 to 2000, Anchorage, Alaska.
Kincaid & Riely LLC Research Analyst / Associate Appraiser, 1995 to 1998, Anchorage,
Alaska.
Designations, Certifications and Awards
State License’s / Certifications State of Alaska, Certified General Real Estate Appraiser, License
No. 545 (expires June 30, 2017).
Designations Mr. Jensen is one of roughly 6,000 individuals worldwide that have
earned the Appraisal Institute’s prestigious MAI designation (MAI
Designation No. 12532). The continuing education requirements
have been completed for the cycle ending December 31, 2018.
Organization Affiliations, Offices & Memberships
President, Alaska Chapter of the Appraisal Institute, 2011-2013
Vice President, Alaska Chapter of the Appraisal Institute, 2009-
2010
Secretary / Treasurer, Alaska Chapter of the Appraisal Institute,
2016
Secretary, Alaska Association of Assessing Officers, 1999
Education Committee Chair, Alaska Chapter of the Appraisal
Institute, 2014-2016
Member, BOMA Anchorage
Theodore S. Jensen, MAI
9330 Vanguard Dr., Suite 201
Anchorage AK, 99507
P: 907.341.2230 F: 907.929.2260 Email: ted@reliantadvisory.com
Partial List of Clients
Our clients include:
· Alaska Native Organizations
· National Financial Institutions
· Alaska Financial Institutions
· Government Sector (Local, State and Federal)
· Legal Sector
· Private Sector
. Local/National Healthcare Providers
A more detailed list of clients and professional
references is available upon request.
Sample of Completed Assignments
Special Purpose Properties
Captain Cook Parking Garage, Anchorage AK
A.P.C. Wrangell Sawmill Facility, Wrangell AK
Tesoro / Burger King (proposed), Seward AK
Automatic Carwash (proposed), Seward AK
Auto Wash Express (proposed), Soldotna AK
Dragnet Fisheries Dock, Seward AK
St. Andrew Kim Church, Anchorage AK
Greek Orthodox Church, Anchorage AK
Peter Pan Seafoods Facility, King Cove AK
Ocean Beauty Seafoods Facility, Kodiak AK
Pacific Star Seafoods Facility, Kenai AK
Shoreside Petroleum Tank Farm, Seward AK
The Wharf, Ketchikan AK
Mt. McKinley Meat and Sausage Facility, Palmer AK
Bethel Fuels Tank Farm, Bethel AK
AGLAD Air Cargo Facility, Anchorage AK
DH Ports Cold Storage Facility, Unalaska AK
Subway Sports Center Ice Rink, Anchorage AK
AT&T Sports Pavilion, Anchorage AK
Aramark Chevron Stations, Cantwell / Healy / Nenana AK
Children’s World Montessori School, Anchorage AK
Northern Lights ABC School, Anchorage AK
Medical Properties
Alaska Surgery Center (proposed), Anchorage AK
Southcentral Foundation DOBH Building (proposed),
Anchorage AK
Valley Hospital Medical Office Building, Palmer AK
4200 Lake Otis Medical Office Building, Anchorage AK
Alaska Women’s Health Building, Anchorage AK
St. Elias Long Term Acute Care Hospital (proposed),
Anchorage AK
3600 Lake Otis Medical Office Building, Anchorage AK
Laurel Street Medical Office Condominiums, Anchorage
AK
Latouche Medical Center, Anchorage AK
Abbott Road Medical, Anchorage AK
Medical Park Condominiums, Anchorage AK
Muldoon Medical Plaza (proposed), Anchorage AK
HealthSouth Building, Anchorage AK
Anchorage Neighborhood Health Center, Anchorage AK
American Hyperbaric Medical Office Building (proposed),
Anchorage AK
Midtown Dental, Anchorage AK
Eagle River Medical Condos, Eagle River AK
Ketchikan Indian Corporation Medical Clinic, Ketchikan
AK
Hotel Properties
Holiday Inn Express (proposed), Anchorage AK
Al’s Alaskan Inn, Anchorage AK
Puffin Inn, Anchorage AK
Alaska Backpacker Inn, Anchorage AK
Frontier Hotel (proposed), Juneau AK
Theodore S. Jensen, MAI
9330 Vanguard Dr., Suite 201
Anchorage AK, 99507
P: 907.341.2230 F: 907.929.2260 Email: ted@reliantadvisory.com
Grande Denali Hotel / Denali Alaskan Lodge, Denali AK
Comfort Inn, Fairbanks AK
MagTek Mancap, Deadhorse AK
Trail Lakes Lodge, Moose Pass AK
The Narrows, Ketchikan AK
Reluctant Fisherman Inn, Cordova AK
Multifamily / Condominium Properties
Highlander Apartments (32 units), Anchorage AK
Chugach and Diamond Willow Estates (56 units),
Anchorage AK
Jillian Square Apartments (356 units), Fairbanks AK
Brighton Park LIHTC (80 units - proposed), Anchorage
AK
Driftwood Apartments (39 units), Anchorage AK
Greenbriar Apartments (193 units), Anchorage AK
Central Park Apartments (69 units), Anchorage AK
College View Apartments (96 units), Anchorage AK
Diamond Willow Apartments (32 units), Anchorage AK
Quad Shot Luxury Condominiums (10 units - proposed),
Anchorage AK
Panoramic View Apartments (268 units), Anchorage AK
Sophie Plaza Apartments (355 units), Fairbanks AK
Wood River Park (63 units), Eagle River AK
Willow Woods Apartments (228 units), Fairbanks AK
Richardson Vista Apartments (406 units) - Subsidized Rent
Project, Anchorage AK
Ladera Villa (55 units), Anchorage AK
Arctic Sun Apartments (77 units), Anchorage AK
Bootlegger Cove Apartments (8 units), Anchorage AK
Rivers Edge Condominiums (42 units - proposed), Eagle
River AK
Lauren Creek Townhome Apartments (62 units),
Anchorage AK
The Glen Apartments (76 units) - Subsidized Rent Project,
Anchorage AK
Legacy Apartments (147 units), Anchorage AK
Strawberry Lane Apartments (184 units), Anchorage AK
Glenn-Muldoon Mobile Home Park (129 spaces),
Anchorage, AK
Olympic Subdivision (29 lots - proposed), Anchorage AK
Kathy ‘O Estates Mobile Home Park (79 spaces),
Anchorage AK
Covenant House R.O.P. Transitional Living, Anchorage,
AK
Grass Creek North LIHTC (52 units), Anchorage AK
Elmendorf Air Force Base Privatized Housing - Aurora
Phase II (1,194 units), Anchorage AK
Ft. Wainwright Privatized Housing (1,850 units), Fairbanks
AK
Ft. Greely Privatized Housing (126 units), Delta Junction
AK
Eielson Air Force Base Privatized Housing (possessory
interest, 934 units), Fairbanks AK
Industrial Properties
Brown Jug / Sadler’s Warehouse, Anchorage AK
ASRC Office Warehouse Facility, Anchorage AK
Puget Sound Pipe and Supply Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Alaska Fish and Farm Products Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Airport Business Park, Anchorage AK
Summit Paving Facility, Anchorage AK
Karakash Transfer Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Superior Plumbing Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Call’s Repair Garage (proposed), Eagle River AK
National-Oilwell Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Tri-Star Distributing Warehouse Expansion, Anchorage
AK
National Bank of Alaska Hangar, Anchorage AK
Wesco Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Alaska Power Systems, Anchorage AK
Reeve Air Motive Building, Anchorage AK
Keystone Distribution Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Chevron Service Station, Anchorage AK
Danza’s International Transfer Warehouse (now DHL),
Anchorage AK
Royal Celebrity Tours Bus Barn, Anchorage AK
Midtown Business Park, Anchorage AK
Polaris Retail/Warehouse (proposed), Eagle River AK
Odom Warehouse Properties, Anchorage AK
Hotwire Electric Office/Warehouse (proposed), Anchorage
AK
Fairbanks Waste Shop, Fairbanks AK
K&L Warehouse, Fairbanks AK
SKS Commercial Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Airline Support Warehouse, Anchorage AK
GE Supply Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Pacific Plumbing, Anchorage AK
AAA Fencing Warehouse (proposed), Anchorage AK
Northern Air Cargo Hangar, Anchorage AK
Former Bailey’s Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Theodore S. Jensen, MAI
9330 Vanguard Dr., Suite 201
Anchorage AK, 99507
P: 907.341.2230 F: 907.929.2260 Email: ted@reliantadvisory.com
Pool Arctic Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Action Security Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Reeve Aleutian Airlines Hangar, Anchorage AK
General Mechanical Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Kenai Waste Facility, Kenai AK
Huffman Business Park (Buildings D, Q & S), Anchorage
AK
Schoon Street Warehouses, Anchorage AK
4000 West 50th Avenue Airport Transfer Warehouse,
Anchorage AK
Hultquist Homes Truss Manufacturing Plant, Anchorage
AK
Hultquist Homes Prefab Housing Facility (proposed),
Anchorage AK
Shaub Tires, Juneau AK
Capital Glass Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Animal Food Warehouse (proposed), Anchorage AK
Alaska Pacific Transfer Warehouse, Anchorage AK
Pacific Diversified International Warehouse, Anchorage
AK
250 Post Road Warehouse Facility, Anchorage AK
Lake-Aire Alaska Hangar, Anchorage AK
Pro Mech Hangar, Ketchikan AK
Arctic Imports Repair Shop, Anchorage AK
Global Rides Hangar, Anchorage AK
International Freight Terminal, Anchorage AK
Johnson’s Tire Service Distribution Facility - Denali Street,
Anchorage AK
Anchorage Distribution Center, Anchorage, AK
Denali Group Warehouse, Fairbanks, AK
AAA Moving Warehouses, Fairbanks, AK
Norcon Warehouse, Fairbanks AK
Arctic Couriers Warehouse, Fairbanks AK
Spenard Builders Supply, Anchorage AK
Freshwater Adventures Hangar, Dillingham AK
Central Mini Storage, Anchorage AK
Tudor Mini Storage, Anchorage AK
King Street Mini Storage, Anchorage AK
Best Storage South, Anchorage AK
Polar Heated Storage, Anchorage AK
Foothills Mini Storage, Anchorage AK
Retail Properties
Reeve Museum Building at the 5th Avenue Mall,
Anchorage, AK
Schucks Auto (proposed),Anchorage AK
Flooring America Building, Anchorage AK
Debenham Plaza, Anchorage AK
Muldoon Mall, Anchorage AK
Former Long’s Drug Store, Anchorage AK
Downtown Retail Rental Rate Analysis, Anchorage AK
Pippel Center, Eagle River AK
GCI Store (proposed), Anchorage AK
Olympic Center, Anchorage AK
Country Village Mall, Anchorage AK
Southtown Center (Diamond Pink Mall), Anchorage AK
College Mall, Anchorage AK
Tempura Kitchen Restaurant, Anchorage AK
DQ Grill ‘n Chill, Anchorage AK
Lone Star Restaurant, Anchorage AK
Red Robin, Anchorage AK
Red Robin, Wasilla AK
Applebees Restaurant, Anchorage AK
Sea Galley Restaurant, Anchorage AK
The Bridge Restaurant, Anchorage AK
Little Italy Restaurant, Anchorage AK
Firetap Restaurant, Anchorage AK
Dowling Park and Sell Facility, Anchorage AK
Diamond International, Skagway AK
Steadman Building, Ketchikan AK
Nye Frontier Ford Dealership, Wasilla AK
Red Diamond Center, Soldotna AK
Wayne’s Texas BBQ Restaurant (proposed), Anchorage
AK
Wasilla Shopping Center, Wasilla AK
Eagle River Plaza, Eagle River AK
UAS Bookstore, Auke Bay AK
Nugget Mall, Juneau AK
Lewis Chevrolet Dealership, Ketchikan AK
Hutchings Auto Dealership, Soldotna AK
Midas Auto, Anchorage AK
Office Properties
3230 C Street, Anchorage AK
3333 Denali Street, Anchorage AK
Fairbanks Office Building, Fairbanks AK
Blackstone Building, Anchorage AK
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation Building, Anchorage
AK
Theodore S. Jensen, MAI
9330 Vanguard Dr., Suite 201
Anchorage AK, 99507
P: 907.341.2230 F: 907.929.2260 Email: ted@reliantadvisory.com
Solar Building, Anchorage AK
Peterson Tower, Anchorage AK
Eagle River Financial Center, Eagle River AK
Enstar Administrative Headquarters, Anchorage AK
Residential Mortgage Building (proposed), Anchorage AK
Centerpoint II Building (proposed), Anchorage AK
KeyBank Center, Anchorage AK
645 G Street, Anchorage AK
Fish and Game Headquarters, Anchorage AK
Nome Federal Building, Nome AK
Alutiiq Center (proposed), Anchorage AK
CBA Building, Anchorage AK
Greatland Office Building (360 Benson), Anchorage AK
KeyBank Plaza, Anchorage AK
188 West Northern Lights Building (proposed), Anchorage
AK
808 E Street, Anchorage AK
Resolution Tower, Anchorage AK
750 West 2nd Avenue, Anchorage AK
Former VECO Headquarters, Anchorage AK
Idaska Office Building, Anchorage AK
AVCP-RHA Headquarters, Bethel AK
PN&D Office Building Expansion, Anchorage AK
Alaska Public Radio Network Building, Anchorage AK
3000 C Street Office Complex, Anchorage AK
Midtown Business Center, Anchorage AK
Alaska Legal Center, Anchorage AK
Newcore Building, Anchorage AK
Credit Union 1 - 36th Avenue, Anchorage AK
Emerald Office Building, Anchorage AK
Inuit Office Building (4141 Ambassador), Anchorage AK
LIO Building, Anchorage AK
Bivin Plaza, Anchorage AK
AKI Building (1400 West Benson), Anchorage AK
Willoughby Office Building complex, Juneau AK
UAS Natural Sciences Research Lab, Juneau AK
JL Tower, Anchorage AK
Centerpoint West, Anchorage AK
Ketchikan Federal Building, Ketchikan AK
Petersburg Federal Building, Petersburg AK
Old Anchorage Federal Building, Anchorage AK
New Anchorage Federal Building, Anchorage AK
Miscellaneous
Ground Lease, Numerous Assignments, throughout Alaska
Vacant Land, Numerous Assignments, throughout Alaska
Surface Parking Lots, Anchorage AK
Subdivisions, Anchorage and Homer AK
Mendenhall Mall Ground Leases, Juneau AK
Alaska Economic Overview Analysis (for KeyBank)
Apartment Housing Study (for Anchorage Telephone
Authority)
Assessed Value Ratio Study (for Seafirst Bank), Anchorage
AK
A Commitment to Client Service
9330 Vanguard Drive, Suite 201
Anchorage, Alaska 99507
Phone: (907) 929-2226
Fax: (907) 929-2260
Email: admin@reliantadvisory.com
www.reliantadvisory.com
Rel
ian
t
A Foundation to Build On:
Vision
Integrity
Commitment
Performance
A Commitment to Client Service:
Quality Research & Analysis
Quality Presentation
Fast Turn Around Times
Competitive Fees
On Time Delivery
Solid Confidentiality
Extensive Valuation & Consulting Services:
Mortgage Financing
Market & Feasibility Analysis
Litigation & Arbitration Support
Sale & Lease Negotiation
Property Tax Consulting
Estate Planning / Documentation
Site Selection
Due Diligence
Investment Analysis
Market Research
Eminent Domain
Partial Interest Valuations
Extensive Market Knowledge:
Institutional
Hotels
Apartment & Condominiums
Medical
Affordable Housing
Senior Housing
Lumber & Sawmills
Shipyards & Marinas
Truck Stops & Travel Centers
Seafood Processing Plants
Right-of-Way / Condemnation
Industrial
Ground Leases
Office
Retail
Bio-Tech
Athletic Clubs
High-Tech
Vacant Land
Parking Garages
Movie Theatres
Wetland Banking/Mitigation
top related