application of rules on child abduction of brussels iibis regulation and 1980 hague convention in...
Post on 31-Dec-2015
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
Application of rules on child abduction of Brussels IIbis Regulation and 1980 Hague Convention in the courts of LatviaAgris SkudraRepresentative from the Latvian Central Authority for International Child Abduction
conference Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgements in cross-border matrimonial matters, July 9-10, 2009, Riga
-
LEGAL REGULATIONSUN Convention on the Rights of the Children of November 20, 1989; 1980 Hague Convention;1996 Hague Convention;Brussels IIbis Regulation;Civil Law;Civil Procedure Law;Regulations of the Cabinet of Minister No. 322 of May 15, 2007.
-
INSTITUTIONSMinistry of Justice(Central Authority since July 1, 2009)City/district courts and regional courts(35 city/district courts, 6 regional courts)Orphans Courts(In 2008 510)State Police
-
BASIC PRINCIPLESChilds interests;Childs habitual place of residence;Other countrys law is respected;Quick, effective mechanisms;Successful cooperation;Effective enforcement of the decision.
-
Preconditions for the childs return Concept of the habitual place of residence: definition;ECJ judgement of 02.04.2009. in the case No. C-523/07, Korkein hallinto - oikeus; courts practice.Detecting unlawfulness:applicable law;courts practice.
-
PRINCIPLES OF NON-RETURNChild has been settled in the new environment;Risk of physical or psychological harm;Childs objections;Person has not used his/her rights, has agreed to childs removal/retention;Recipient countrys basic principles regarding the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
-
STATISTICS
Chart1
30
51
114
42
178
120
FROM Latvia
TO Latvia
CHILD ABDUCTION CASES
Sheet1
NO Latvijas aizvestieUZ Latviju atvestie
2004
Janvris1. Bfs () GBR
Februris
Marts
Aprlis
Maijs
Jnijs
Jlijs
Augusts
Septembris
Oktobris
Novembris1. Jaseavski () GER
Decembris1. Uvarovs (1997) GER
2005
Janvris1. amans (2000) GBR
Februris
Marts
Aprlis
Maijs
Jnijs
Jlijs1. Greidns (1999) IRL
Augusts
Septembris1. Bulatkins (2001) FRA2. ikonovs (1996) ESP
Oktobris1. Raksti (1994) GBR1. Goldrins (2004) IZR
Novembris
Decembris
2006
Janvris1. Liepi (1996) IRL1. Barstads (2001) NOR
Februris
Marts1. Levenkova (2002) TUR2. ukovs (2003) IRL
Aprlis1. Masjule (2001) GBR2. Dukure (2000) GBR
Maijs1. Dria (1997) FIN
Jnijs
Jlijs1. Gributs (2000) IRL
Augusts1. Ribakova (1998) IRL
Septembris1. ikute (2003) IRL
Oktobris1. Komorovskis (1999) GBR2. Petrovs (2001) IRL
Novembris1. Brzi (2002) GBR
Decembris1. Sutkalne (2002) GBR1. D'Agostino (2004) ITA
2007
Janvris1. Campanella (2002) ITA
Februris1. Dagovis () TR
Marts
Aprlis
Maijs
Jnijs
Jlijs
Augusts
Septembris
Oktobris1. Neimanis (2004) SWE
Novembris
Decembris1. Brikena (2001) ASV2. Burve (1997) SWE3. ulca (2000) GBR
2008
Janvris
Februris1.Bogdanovas () SWE1. Mahmouda (2006) GBR2. Bermane (2003) EST
Marts1. Luns (2001) IRL2. Brders (2002) IRL1. Brauns (2006) GBR
Aprlis1. Gtmane (2001) IRL1. Peterson (2007) GBR
Maijs1. Zarne (2002) IRL1. Gleks (2004) GER
Jnijs1. Slti (2002) IRL2. Kolomejeva (2003) GBR
Jlijs1. Krauklis (2001) IRL2. Hadkevica (2000) POL3. Lapke (2001) GER4. Stepane (1995) GBR
Augusts1. Dombrovska (2002) IRL1. bergs (2004) SWE
Septembris1. Soubbotina (2002) GER2. Silicka (2002) IRL3. Gavars (1996) IRL1. damsone (2005) AUSTR
Oktobris1. Flaks (1997) IRL1. Kudelka (2003) AUSTRIJA
Novembris1.Daiicki (1995; 1999) GER
Decembris
FROM LatviaTO Latvia
200430
200551
2006114
200742
2008178
2009120
KOP:5215
TOFROM
Ireland16UK4
UK10Italy2
Germany5Sweden2
Sweden2Ireland1
Spain1Norway1
Turkey1Israel1
Finland1Estonia1
China1Germany1
France1Austria1
USA1Australia1
Poland1
Sheet1
FROM Latvia
TO Latvia
CHILD ABDUCTION CASES
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
OUTCOMESFROM Latvia:
Return 18Non-return 6Withdrawals 14Continuing 14
From these: 6 Section 771. of CPL
Total: 52
TO Latvia:
Voluntarily 1Return 6Non-return 4Withdrawals 4
Total: 15
-
COMMON FEATURESDisagreement among parents;Childs abductors interests vs. childs interests;Role of relatives;Role of mass media;Lack of legal consciousness;I know I will lose.
-
Cases in the Courts of Latvia ISection 771 of Civil Procedure Law Article 15 of Hague Convention;6 weeks rule;National Law vs. International;Role of Orphans Courts;Lack of direct communication among judges;Training.
-
Cases in the Courts of Latvia IIDetecting of unlawfulness;Article13 of Hague Convention the most considered and applied grounds for non-return;Consequences after the application of Article 13 of Hague Convention;Article 20 of Hague Convention;Formulation of decision.
-
Thank you!Questions?Comments?
-
Application of rules on child abduction of Brussels IIbis Regulation and 1980 Hague Convention in the courts of LatviaAgris SkudraRepresentative from the Latvian Central Authority for International Child Abduction
conference Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgements in cross-border matrimonial matters, July 9-10, 2009, Riga
top related