appendix 8b: odour management plan - planning … · 8b.1.20 this document forms appendix 8b of the...
Post on 07-Jun-2018
224 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Environmental Statement – Volume III (Appendices)
July 2014 Appendix 1A
APPENDIX 8B: ODOUR MANAGEMENT PLAN
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref No: 6.4.11
PINS Ref: EN010061
The Proposed Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2) Order
Ferrybridge Power Station Site, Knottingley, West Yorkshire
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan
The Planning Act 2008
The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure)
Regulations 2009
Regulation 5(2)(a)
The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations
2009
Applicant: Multifuel Energy Limited
Date: July 2014
Document History
July 2014 (i)
Document Number 6.4.11
Revision
Author Sarah Taylor(URS)
Signed Date 25.06.14
Approved By Richard Lowe (URS)
Signed Date 25.06.14
Document Owner URS
Revision History
Revision No. Date Reason for Revision Authorised By
Submission version July 2014 K Cobb
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 (ii)
Glossary
MEL Multifuel Energy Limited
DCO Development Consent Order
PINS Planning Inspectorate
PA 2008 Planning Act 2008
MWe megawatts
FM2 Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 Power Station
SoS Secretary of State
FM1 Ferrybridge Multifuel 1
SSE SSE Generation Ltd
WTI Wheelabrator Technologies Inc.
EfW Energy from Waste
WMDC Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
ha hectares
APFP Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedures
CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
MSW Municipal Solid Waste
C&I Commercial & Industrial (Waste)
ES Environmental Statement
WDF Waste Derived Fuel
BAT Best Available Techniques
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 (iii)
Contents
8B.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
The Background to the Proposed Development ......................................................................... 1
The Applicant .............................................................................................................................. 1
The Application Site .................................................................................................................... 2
The Proposed Development ....................................................................................................... 2
The Purpose and Structure of this Document ............................................................................. 2
8B.2 Proposed Development Overview ........................................................................................... 3
Fuel Deliveries............................................................................................................................. 3
8B.3 Potential Sources of Odour ...................................................................................................... 4
8B.4 Potential Receptors .................................................................................................................. 5
8B.5 Legislative Controls .................................................................................................................. 6
8B.6 Physical Controls ...................................................................................................................... 7
Routine Operations ..................................................................................................................... 7
Abnormal Operations (Commissioning/ Maintenance/ Outage) ................................................. 7
Fuel Acceptance Procedures ...................................................................................................... 8
Monitoring .................................................................................................................................... 8
Management of OMP .................................................................................................................. 9
8B.7 References ...............................................................................................................................10
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 1 of Appendix 8B
8B. APPENDIX 8B - ODOUR MANAGEMENT PLAN
8B.1 Introduction
8B.1.1 This framework Odour Management Plan has been prepared in support of Multifuel
Energy Limited’s (the Applicant’s) application (the Application) for a Development
Consent Order (DCO) that has been made to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) under
Section 37 of the Planning Act 2008 (the PA 2008).
8B.1.2 The Application seeks a DCO for the construction and operation of a new build ‘multifuel’
power station of up to 90 megawatts (MW) gross output and associated development (the
Proposed Development). The Proposed Development is known as Ferrybridge Multifuel
Power Station (hereafter referred to as FM2) and will be located within the existing
Ferrybridge Power Station site in Knottingley, West Yorkshire.
8B.1.3 The DCO, if granted, would be known as the ‘Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2) Power Station
Order’.
The Background to the Proposed Development
8B.1.4 FM2 will be capable of producing low carbon electricity through the use of waste derived
fuels from various sources of processed municipal solid waste, commercial and industrial
waste and waste wood. It will therefore make a positive contribution toward the UK
Government’s climate change commitments, in addition to increasing the diversity and
security of national electricity supply, while also reducing the amount of waste sent to
landfill.
8B.1.5 A similar multifuel power station is already being constructed on land within the
Ferrybridge Power Station site. This project is known as Ferrybridge Multifuel 1 (FM1)
Power Station and was consented under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 in October
2011. It is anticipated that FM1 will be fully operational from Q3 2015.
8B.1.6 The level of interest received from potential fuel suppliers in relation to FM1 has
demonstrated that there is sufficient demand and fuel availability for a second multifuel
power station at Ferrybridge. This is one of the reasons that have led to the Applicant’s
decision to progress FM2.
The Applicant
8B.1.7 The Applicant, Multifuel Energy Limited (MEL) is a 50:50 joint venture that has been
formed by SSE Generation Ltd (SSE) and WTI/EfW Holdings Ltd, a subsidiary of
Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. (WTI) to develop low carbon electricity generating plant.
8B.1.8 SSE is one of the UK’s leading energy companies and the largest non-nuclear electricity
generator, operating a diverse portfolio across the UK and Ireland. A subsidiary of SSE
owns and operates the Ferrybridge Power Station site, which includes the operational
Ferrybridge ‘C’ coal-fired Power Station.
8B.1.9 WTI is a leading developer, owner and operator of energy from waste (EfW) facilities and
has been established for over 37 years. WTI currently owns and/or operates 21 energy
facilities in the USA, 17 of which are EfW facilities. It has also recently acquired part of a
business in China that has three operational plants and a further six under development.
8B.1.10 The Applicant has an option agreement in place to enter into a lease for the land within
the Application Site (the proposed DCO (‘the Order’) Limits’) that is within the control of
SSE, while the draft DCO seeks the necessary powers and authorisations in respect of
the land that lies outside SSE’s control.
8B.1.11 Further information on the Applicant can be found by going to the FM2 project website:
www.multifuelenergy.com/fm2 .
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 2 of Appendix 8B
The Application Site
8B.1.12 The Application Site (the Order Limits) comprises almost entirely land inside the
boundary of the Ferrybridge Power Station site and is entirely within the administrative
area of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council (WMDC). The Ferrybridge Power Station
site is situated between the River Aire to the north and east and the A1(M) immediately to
the west.
8B.1.13 The Application Site itself extends to approximately 32 hectares (ha) and consists
primarily of land that originally formed part of the Power Station’s former golf course,
including land that is currently being used in connection with the construction of FM1, in
addition to other land (some of which is outside the Power Station site) that may be
required for electricity grid and utilities connections.
8B.1.14 A detailed description of the Application Site and its location and surroundings is provided
in the ‘Application Site Description Document’ (Application Document Ref. No. 5.2), which
forms part of the Application.
The Proposed Development
8B.1.15 The Proposed Development comprises the multifuel power station (the ‘onshore
generating station’) and all the elements that are integral to it, including the fuel reception
and storage facilities, combustion system, steam turbine and emissions stack, amongst
others, as well as associated and supporting buildings, structures, plant and areas.
8B.1.16 In addition, it includes ‘Associated Development’ within the meaning of Section 115(2) of
the PA 2008 that will support the operational of the multifuel power station. This
comprises a connection to the electricity grid network, improvements to an existing
access road and a new foul water connection.
8B.1.17 The Proposed Development will also involve temporary works connected with the
construction phase, such as contractors’ compounds and laydown areas.
8B.1.18 A detailed description of all the elements of the Proposed Development is provided in the
‘Proposed Development Description Document’ (Application Document Ref. No. 5.3).
8B.1.19 It is currently anticipated that (subject to a DCO being granted and a final investment
decision being made) work will commence on the Proposed Development in Q4 of 2015,
with construction expected to be completed by Q2/Q3 of 2018. Subject to construction
being completed within this timescale, the multifuel power station would enter commercial
operation in Q4 2018.
The Purpose and Structure of this Document
8B.1.20 This document forms Appendix 8B of the Environmental Statement that accompanies the
DCO application. It provides a framework for the management of odour should it arise
from the operation of the Proposed Development. It has been prepared with reference to
Institute of Air Quality Management Guidance (Ref 8B-1)
8B.1.21 At this stage in the development process, the detailed design of the Proposed
Development has not been undertaken as a construction contractor has not yet been
appointed, and therefore any specific odour control measures cannot yet be designed or
sized. However, it is recognised that odour nuisance is a potential concern of the
community and therefore this framework has been developed to which the appointed
contractor must adhere. Odour control will also be managed in accordance with the
principles of Best Available Techniques (BAT) and regulated by the Environment Agency
through the Environmental Permit required for the operation of the multifuel power
station.
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 3 of Appendix 8B
8B.2 Proposed Development Overview
8B.2.1 The Proposed Development is a Multifuel Power Station with an electrical generation
capacity of up to 90 MW from the combustion of Waste Derived Fuel (WDF) from various
sources of processed Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), ‘commercial and industrial’ waste
and waste wood. Generated electricity will be exported to the electricity network.
8B.2.2 In outline the process will be as follows:
Fuel will be delivered to the Proposed Development by road, with the additional option
of rail deliveries. The fuel will be unloaded in the tipping hall and stored in a fuel
bunker;
there will be a single shared bunker serving two combustion lines;
for each line, fuel will be moved from the bunker to the furnace where it will be
combusted, generating gases and bottom ash residues;
bottom ash will be ejected to a water bath to cool the ash and provide a gas seal;
the gases will be passed through a boiler to raise steam. The steam from both boilers
will then be passed to a shared steam turbine to generate electricity for use within the
facility and for export;
the resulting flue gas will be cleaned in a Flue Gas Treatment (FGT) plant. This is
anticipated to include the injection of activated carbon (primarily to control dioxin and
furan and heavy metal emissions); the injection of lime or suitable equivalent to control
acid gas emissions; and the use of fabric filters to remove dust. Selective Non
Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) will be installed, which would be used to abate nitrogen
oxide emissions if required;
the cleaned exhaust gases will be released to atmosphere via a stack circa 120 m
high (with the top of the stack fixed at 136 mAOD): and
the facility will be Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Ready as defined within
Environment Agency guidance (Ref 8B-2). If a local heating demand becomes
available, the provision of a heat off-take to supply a potential network would be
possible with minimal modifications to the installed system.
8B.2.3 An Environmental Statement (ES) has been prepared as part of the Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) Process. Chapter 8 Air Quality of the ES (Application
Document Ref. No. 6.2) presents an air quality impact assessment which addresses the
potential effects on local air quality predicted to arise as a consequence of emissions to
air from the Proposed Development during construction, operation and eventual
decommissioning. Part of the air quality impact assessment discusses the potential for
odour to impact local receptors and the controls in place to manage this impact.
Fuel Deliveries
8B.2.4 Fuel will be delivered to the Proposed Development by road, with the additional option of
rail deliveries. The preferred and most sustainable transport route for different fuel
contracts will be determined on a case by case basis through discussions with the fuel
supplier, based on proximity to the Site, volume of fuel, economics and transport facilities
at the fuel provider locations.
8B.2.5 The fuel will be delivered to the Site in enclosed containers. Only once the vehicle is
inside the tipping hall will it be opened and tipped into the fuel bunker. Cranes will then lift
the fuel from the fuel bunker into hoppers to subsequently be discharged onto the grate
where it is burnt. This process ensures that all routine fuel handling is done inside the
tipping hall building where the systems described in this Management Plan (see Section
8B.6 below) can control the odour.
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 4 of Appendix 8B
8B.3 Potential Sources of Odour
8B.3.1 Odour could potentially be generated from the WDF used at the Proposed Development.
8B.3.2 The odour associated with the fuel could be due to the type of fuel itself or from the
decomposition/ degradation of the fuel during storage.
8B.3.3 No significant odours are envisaged from the handling and storage of combustion by-
products or Flue Gas Treatment (FGT) reagents; the latter (e.g. aqueous ammonia) will
be stored in sealed tanks and filled from tankers fitted with back-venting systems to
minimise fugitive emissions in accordance with indicative ‘Best Available Techniques’
(BAT).
8B.3.4 At this design stage it is anticipated that there will not be any significant odour releases
and therefore there are no likely significant effects anticipated (without mitigation) for
odour. However, the Applicant has given consideration to potential receptors located
near to the Site and outlined the legislative and physical controls to be put in place.
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 5 of Appendix 8B
8B.4 Potential Receptors
8B.4.1 The Ferrybridge Power Station site extends to an area of approximately 300 ha, of which
the Proposed Development is being constructed on land that was formerly used as a golf
course, in the north-western part of the Power Station site. The land uses immediately
surrounding the Ferrybridge Power Station site are summarised as:
North: River Aire and Fryston Wood, beyond which are arable fields, small villages
and farms;
South: Stranglands Lane, beyond which are the residential areas of Pollards Fields
and Knottingley;
East: River Aire, Kirkhaw Lane and railway lines, industrial and commercial premises
and a water treatment works, beyond which are arable fields, small villages (including
Brotherton) and farms; and
West: A1(M) and its embankment, wood land and agricultural land (including Fryston
Park and Holmfield Farm) beyond which is Castleford.
8B.4.2 Key receptors have been identified as part of the EIA process and summarised below.
Further details are included in the relevant ES chapters. Where distances are quoted
below, the distance is defined (unless otherwise stated) as the shortest distance between
two described locations, for example from closest point of the Proposed Development
Site boundary to the closest point of a designated site boundary.
8B.4.3 The potentially sensitive receptors to the Proposed Development include:
Local farms and including Holmfield Farm (200 m west), Top Farm (340 m west),
Manor Farm (40 m south-east) and Fryston Hall Farm (900 m north);
Local residents at Oakland Hill off Fryston Lane immediately west of the A1(M),
approximately 200m west of the Site;
Local residents immediately to the south of the Ferrybridge Power Station site off
Stranglands Lane and Kirkhaw Lane;
Local residents of the surrounding urban areas including Castleford, Brotherton,
Ferrybridge and Knottingley; and
Users of local recreational facilities including:
Fryston Park Local Wildlife Site;
Fairburn and Newton Ings Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Local Nature
Reserve;
Madbanks and Ledsham Banks SSSI and Local Nature Reserve;
Ledstone Hall and Park; and
Friarwood Valley Gardens.
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 6 of Appendix 8B
8B.5 Legislative Controls
8B.5.1 A number of legislative controls are in place to control emissions to air in the UK,
including the Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010, The Environment Act 1995, The
Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (as amended) (EPR)
and the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) (Ref. 8B-1).
8B.5.2 Of these, the key regulations which direct how odours are mitigated and managed at
regulated facilities are the EPR. These regulations require operators of specified
activities to apply to the Environment Agency for an Environmental Permit prior to
commencing works.
8B.5.3 The Environmental Permit for the operation of the Proposed Development will require the
control of emissions to avoid odour at a level which could cause annoyance outside the
Site, together with the implementation of appropriate control measures to minimise any
odour.
8B.5.4 Once duly made, the Environment Agency will regulate the facility to ensure its
compliance with the conditions stated within the permit (including those relating to odour
control).
8B.5.5 In accordance with the IED, the Environmental Permit will stipulate that control measures
at the facility use ‘Best Available Techniques’ (BAT). An odour assessment and high
level BAT justification has been prepared for the Environmental Permit application that is
being submitted at the same time as this DCO application, recognising that until a
contractor has been appointed for construction, definitive design information and BAT
justifications cannot be provided.
8B.5.6 The control of odour must be in accordance with the use of BAT as outlined in
Environment Agency and European sector guidance and the Environment Agency
Horizontal Guidance Note for Odour H4 (Ref. 8B-3).
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 7 of Appendix 8B
8B.6 Physical Controls
8B.6.1 There are two scenarios that need to be considered for odour control: when the power
station is in operation and when the power station is shut down, during periods of
maintenance for example. These two scenarios are considered below.
Routine Operations
8B.6.2 A competent person will be assigned as responsible for each of the routine control
procedures outlined below, which will be managed through the Environmental Permit for
the operational Proposed Development.
8B.6.3 Odours from delivery vehicles will be minimised by the use of enclosed vehicle
containers, in accordance with indicative BAT. The drivers will also be required to close
the containers after unloading, so that the empty trucks are also not open to the
atmosphere. The fuel will be kept enclosed until it is tipped from the vehicle within the
tipping hall, thereby complying with the BAT requirement to enclose waste derived fuel
until it is received in the furnace.
8B.6.4 When the power station is in operation, odour control will be achieved by drawing air from
the fuel bunker and tipping hall through into the combustion system, which will need air to
ensure effective combustion of the fuel. This is in accordance with the BAT requirement
for air from potentially odorous areas to be fed into the combustion system as far as
possible.
8B.6.5 The system will be designed to provide a slight negative pressure within the tipping hall,
minimising the risk of any odours being released as fugitive emissions from the tipping
hall and fuel bunker.
8B.6.6 During normal operation, air would be drawn into the combustion system via two potential
routes:
If the doors to the tipping hall are shut, air would be drawn through vents or louvers;
and
If the doors to the tipping hall are open (during lorry movements), air would be drawn
through the open doors.
8B.6.7 The fuel bunker will be accessed from the tipping hall via tipping bays. Each bay will have
its own cover that would be closed except when deliveries are taking place. When the
covers are in place, vents would allow a flow of air into the fuel bunker. Air would be
drawn from the fuel bunker by the primary air fan of each combustion line.
8B.6.8 The Proposed Development will be designed to maintain an appropriate negative
pressure within the fuel bunker and tipping hall; throughout operation the operational
practice will be to keep the main doors closed where possible so as to restrict
opportunities for fugitive emissions to be carried out of the building.
8B.6.9 Each of the two combustion lines is being designed to operate for around 90% of the time
and planned maintenance periods will be staggered with the intention of keeping at least
one combustion line in operation for 51 weeks of the year. Therefore, through the
installation and operation of two combustion lines, it is expected that at least one line will
be in operation up to 98% of the time throughout the year.
Abnormal Operations (Commissioning/ Maintenance/ Outage)
8B.6.10 A competent person will be assigned as responsible for each of the procedures outlined
below to manage abnormal operations such as commissioning, maintenance and outage.
8B.6.11 When the power station is shut down there will typically be some fuel stored in the fuel
bunker and there may also be deliveries of fuel during the period. However, for planned
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 8 of Appendix 8B
off-line periods, both the volume of stored fuel and the deliveries would be reduced where
possible, subject to contractual obligations, in accordance with indicative BAT.
8B.6.12 It is recognised that there is a risk of increased odour from fuel that is stored in situ for
extended periods. Fuel stocks will be managed by the trained operators who will first of
all screen incoming loads that arrive from new sources for example, so they can be
handled appropriately or, if necessary, returned to the supplier. Fuel within the bunker
will then be rotated where possible such that older fuel is prioritised for combustion over
newly received fuel. Good mixing of the fuel will be undertaken to minimise the potential
for development of anaerobic conditions thereby minimising the potential for generation of
odours.
8B.6.13 It is recognised that indicative BAT as specified in the EU BAT Reference document (Ref.
8B-4) is to make provision for the control of odour when the power station is not
operating, by avoiding fuel storage overload and/ or the use of an alternative odour
control system.
8B.6.14 At this stage, the management of fuel stocks is proposed for odour management as the
use of primary means to control a potential emission is higher up the BAT hierarchy than
the use of secondary abatement techniques. However, the Proposed Development will
be designed such that, should the need arise, additional odour control techniques could
be retrofitted to further control odour releases, using for example carbon filters. If
installed, any such control system would be cleaned and maintained under the Site
preventative maintenance regime to minimise the risk of failure. Should the abatement
technologies suffer a temporary break down, or loss of efficiency, the maintenance team
will investigate the cause and fix the issue as soon as practicable.
8B.6.15 Should fuel materials be spilled during handling, they will be collected and returned into
the fuel bunker or process as soon as practicable.
8B.6.16 As a back-up system to the proposed measures, it is intended that a deodorising spray
system will be fitted in the tipping hall for occasional short term use (e.g. depending on
the weather conditions or during periods of shut-down). While such de-odorising sprays
do not abate any odour, they are recognised within the industry as a useful tool to reduce
the intensity or offensiveness of an odour over short periods. This system is being
installed as a back-up control measure on the FM1 power station for example.
Fuel Acceptance Procedures
8B.6.17 Formal, documented fuel management procedures will be put in place to describe the
criteria for fuel acceptance, storage, management and its movement around the facility,
to minimise odour.
8B.6.18 The procedures will specify the types of fuel which can be accepted at the Site (in
accordance with the Environmental Permit). They will also stipulate fuel storage
methods, capacities and inspection processes to be put in place to manage potential
odours.
Monitoring
8B.6.19 Meteorological conditions for the Site have been considered and reported in the
Environmental Statement (see Application Document Ref. No. 6.4.10). The prevailing
wind direction for the Site is from the south-west/ west.
8B.6.20 Odour levels will be monitored by site management regularly around the Site perimeter to
assess the effectiveness of the odour control measures being applied.
8B.6.21 During the construction and operational phases of the Proposed Development,
monitoring of any odour complaints received will be undertaken regularly and appropriate
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 9 of Appendix 8B
responses will be initiated. The process for this will be set out in the Construction
Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and the operator’s Environmental
Management System.
8B.6.22 If the Applicant receives a complaint regarding odour generated at the Site, it will be
managed in accordance with a documented Complaints Procedure, which will include an
investigation into the source of the odour and whether any additional mitigation measures
are required (such as use of the deodorising spray). If necessary, operational procedures
will be amended as appropriate following the outcome of the investigation.
Management of OMP
8B.6.23 A competent person will be designated to implement and maintain this OMP during the
operation of the power station. The site management team will respond to odour-related
incidents and elevated odour levels identified during routine inspections or on receipt of
odour complaints; including carrying out investigations and taking appropriate remedial
action to prevent recurrence.
8B.6.24 The designated person will be responsible for undertaking at least an annual review of
the effectiveness of the odour controls in place, taking account of complaints, monitoring
results, inspections, surveys and other information and feedback received.
8B.6.25 The site maintenance team will undertake planned preventative maintenance including
containment of any odour sources and any control equipment.
8B.6.26 Ongoing liaison with the community and stakeholders will be undertaken via the
Community Liaison Group meetings.
8B.6.27 Records will be maintained of all activities and actions relating to odour and this OMP.
Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2)
Document Ref: 6.4.11
Appendix 8B - Odour Management Plan:
July 2014 Page 10 of Appendix 8B
8B.7 References
Ref 8B-1 Institute of Air Quality Management (2014) Guidance on the assessment of
odour for planning
Ref 8B-2 European Commission (2010) European Directive on Industrial Emissions
2010/75/EU
Ref. 8B-3 Environment Agency (2011) Environmental Permitting: H4 Odour
Management
Ref. 8B-4 European Commission (2006) Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control
Reference Document on the Best Available Techniques for Waste
Incineration
top related