“gateway” - denver · 2015-06-25 · ranking 1 to 10 weight x ranking; ranking 1 to 10. weight...

Post on 08-Aug-2020

10 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Conceptual Diagrams “Gateway”

Conceptual Diagrams “Gateway”

Conceptual Diagrams “Original”

Conceptual Diagrams “Original”

Conceptual Diagrams

Conceptual Diagrams

Conceptual Diagrams “Jewell Care”

Conceptual Diagrams “Jewell Care”

Conceptual Diagrams

Conceptual Diagrams “T.O.D.”

Conceptual Diagrams “T.O.D.”

Conceptual Diagrams “Colorado Station”

Conceptual Diagrams “Colorado Station”

Conceptual Diagrams “Colorado Station”

Conceptual Diagrams

Decision Matrix

COLORADO CENTER LOCATION MATRIX

CRITERIA WEIGHT LOCATIONTOTAL SCORE LOCATION

TOTAL SCORE LOCATION

TOTAL SCORE LOCATION

TOTAL SCORE LOCATION

TOTAL SCORE COMMENTS

Weight = 1 to 5

Ranking 1 to 10

Weight x Ranking

Ranking 1 to 10

Weight x Ranking

Ranking 1 to 10

Weight x Ranking

Ranking 1 to 10

Weight x Ranking

Ranking 1 to 10

Weight x Ranking

GATEWAY ORIGINALJEWELL

CARE TODCOLORADO

STATIONVISIBILITY - Visual relationship between

bridge and light rail station Good visibility = 10 Bad visibility = 0

North 3 7 21 9 27 6 18 2 6 8 24

South 3 0 0 2 6 1 3 1 3 10 30No visibility corridor - blocked by Colorado Center Development

SAFETY - Ramp in an active environment with perceived security

Safe = 10Unsafe = 0

North 5 10 50 6 30 6 30 4 20 7 35South 5 10 50 7 35 7 35 7 35 9 45

ACCESS - Direct, short, and intuitive connection to major destinations

Good access = 10Bad access = 0

North 5 1 5 9 45 9 45 9 45 9 45South 5 3 15 8 40 5 25 5 25 10 50

BIKES/(PEDS) USAGE - Density and potential users within landing area

Good usage = 10Bad usage = 0

North 4 1 4 8 32 8 32 8 32 8 32South 4 1 4 4 16 3 12 3 12 9 36

BRIDGE SPAN LENGTHShorter bridge length = 10longer = 0

4 3 12 9 36 8 32 5 20 8 32

RAMP GEOMETRY - Height, length, radius of turn, maintenance vehicle access

Good ramp geometry = 10Bad ramp geometry = 0

North 4 9 36 3 12 3 12 4 16 9 36South 4 9 36 6 24 3 12 5 20 10 40

AESTHETICS - Mass, fit into built environment and context

Good aesthetics = 10Bad aesthetics = 0

North 2 9 18 3 6 3 6 7 14 6 12South 2 8 16 6 12 5 10 6 12 9 18

KNOWN INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS -Parking, buildings, traffic, highway signage

No infrastructure impacts = 10High infrastructure impacts = 0

North 3 10 30 2 6 2 6 1 3 4 12South 3 10 30 7 21 7 21 7 21 10 30

UTILITY IMPACTS - Surface and subsurface public & private facilities

No utility impacts = 10High utility impacts = 0

North 4 7 28 5 20 5 20 8 32 6 24South 4 7 28 8 32 8 32 8 32 8 32

ROW - Amount and ease of acquisition No ROW impacts = 10High ROW impact = 0

North 5 8 40 2 10 2 10 0 0 2 10South 5 8 40 6 30 6 30 6 30 9 45

TOTALS 463 440 391 378 588

GATEWAY ORIGINAL JEWELL CARE TOD COLORADO STATION

HNTB Evaluation

top related