antibiotics and biofilm: in vitro evidence and new ... · 16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro &...

Post on 28-Jul-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

116/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics

Antibiotics and biofilm: in vitro evidence and

new clinical applications

Prof. Françoise Van Bambeke, PharmD, PhD

Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaireLouvain Drug Research Institute

Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

<www.facm.ucl.ac.be>

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 2

Biofilms: what are we speaking about ?

Attachment Maturation Dispersion

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 3

History of biofilm development in vivoNatural history of biofilm formation in vivo during the establishment

of chronic implant-associated S.aureus osteomyelitis in mice

Nishitani et al; J Orthop Res. 2015;33:1311-9

Attachment Maturation Dispersion

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 4

Biofilms in human infections

aCDC 1999; bLewis et al, Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007; 5:48-56

earnosethroat

mouth & teetheyelungheart

kidneygall bladderpancreas

nervous systemskinbone***

implanted medical devices

Biofilms are associated to 65a-80b % of human infections and can colonize virtually all organs …

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 5

Main pathogens in biofilm-related diseases

Römling & Balsalobre; J Intern Med. 2012; 272:541-61

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 6

Antibiotics and biofilms in clinical practice

Treatment failure is not rare…

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 7

PK/PD parameters in biofilms

catheter, bone, skin, cardiac valve, …

nutrients &

oxygen

pharmacokinetics

diffusibility through the matrix bioavailability within the biofilm access to bacteria efflux out of bacteria

pharmacodynamics

bacterial responsiveness(metabolic activity of bacteria) antibiotic expression of activity(local environment [O2, pH, ..])

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 8

In vitro evidence : models in 96-well polystyrene plates

appropriate dyes

to evaluate biomass or bacterial load

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 9

Quantifying biomass and metabolic activity in biofilms

crystal violet

biofilm mass

Christensen et al, Infect. Immun. 1982; 37:318–26

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 10

Quantifying biomass and metabolic activity in biofilms

crystal violet

biofilm mass

resazurin

resorufin

metabolic activity

fluorescein diacetate

fluorescein

Gram(+) bacteria Gram(-) bacteria

Christensen et al, Infect. Immun. 1982; 37:318–26

Tote et al, 2008; Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46:249–254 Wanandy et al, J Microbiol Methods 2005;60:21-30

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 11

Kinetics of biofilm formation

Bauer, Siala et al, Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 2013;57:2726-37

6 12 18 24 30 36 42 480

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

resorufin fluorescencecrystal violet absorbance

time of incubation (h)

% o

f val

ue a

t 6 h

youngbiofilm

mature biofilm

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 12

Pharmacodynamic model for antibiotic activity

An example with a young biofilm of S. aureus - ATCC MSSA

vancomycin

CT0

20

40

60

80

100

120

RFCV

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0log10 concentration (X MIC)

% c

ontr

ol v

alue

Emax « efficacy »

C25-50-75« rel. potency »

Bauer, Siala et al, Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 2013;57:2726-37

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 13

Pharmacodynamic model for antibiotic activity

Young vs. mature biofilm of S. aureus - ATCC MSSA

vancomycin vs mature biofilm (24h)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

RFCV

log10 concentration (X MIC)

% c

ontro

l val

ue

CT

Bauer, Siala et al, Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 2013;57:2726-37

vancomycin vs. young biofilm (6h)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

RFCV

log10 concentration (X MIC)

% c

ontro

l val

ue

CT

Emax

C25-50-75

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 14

Pharmacodynamic model for antibiotic activity

Comparison of antibiotic efficacy – ATCC reference strains

Bauer, Siala et al, Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 2013;57:2726-37

LZDVAN RIF

TGCMXF

DFXOXA

FUSDAP

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

E max

(% re

duct

ion)

MSSA MRSA

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 15

Daptomycin, a lipoglycopeptide

Van Bambeke et al; Amstrong & Cohen – Infectious diseases 2016

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 16

Pharmacodynamic model for antibiotic activity

Bauer, Siala et al, Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 2013;57:2726-37

Comparison of antibiotic relative potency - ATCC MSSA

LZDVAN RIF

TGCMXF

DFXOXA

FUSDAP

0.0625

0.25

1

4

16

64

256

C25

(X M

IC)

MSSA MRSA

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 17

Delafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 18

Delafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 19

Comparison of antibiotic activity in confocal microscopy

Bauer, Siala et al, Antimicrob Ag Chemother. 2013;57:2726-37

Live/dead staining (antibiotics at 32 X MIC) – ATCC MRSA

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 20

Moving to clinical isolates from pandemic lineages

Siala et al, Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 2014, 58: 6385–6397.

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 21

Comparison of 2 strains & 3 antibiotics

Siala et al, Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 2014, 58: 6385–6397.

viability

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

DFXDAPVAN

CT

biomass

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50

20

40

60

80

100

120

CT

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5CT -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50

20

40

60

80

100

120

CT

Log10 concentration (mg/L)

Perc

enta

ge o

f con

trol

val

ue

2011S027

2003/651

Huge variability in activity

among strains…

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 22

Comparison of 7 strains & 5 antibiotics

Siala et al, Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 2014, 58: 6385–6397.

linezolid

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

25% 50% 75%

vancomycin

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

25% 50% 75%

moxifloxacin

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

25% 50% 75%

delafloxacin

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

25% 50% 75%

daptomycin

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

25% 50% 75%

S028179

104651

S027S0251083

relative potency (% reduction in resorufin fluorescence)

conc

. nee

ded

to re

ach

the

spec

ified

effe

ct (m

g/L)

Daptomycin and fluoroquinolones more potent…but again, high variability among strains

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 23

Importance of antibiotic concentration inside biofilms for activity

Siala et al, Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 2014, 58: 6385–6397.

Activity in biofilm is correlated with antibiotic penetration

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 24

Biofilm matrix: what is it made of ?

Rabin et al., Future Med. Chem. 2015; 7:493–512

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 25

Adjuvants acting on the matrix

Let’s try this amphipathic molecule …It looks like a detergent, doesn’t it ?

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 26

Adjuvants acting on the matrix

But do you recognize this

molecule ?

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 27

Adjuvants acting on the matrix

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 28

Adjuvants acting on the matrix

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 29

delafloxacin -/+ caspofungin on strain 2003/651

0

25

50

75

100

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0log10 DFX concentration (mg/l)

% c

ontro

l val

ue

2003/651

CT

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 30

delafloxacin -/+ caspofungin on strain 2003/651

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00

25

50

75

100

% control values

log10 DFX concentration (mg/l)CT

0

25

50

75

100

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0log10 DFX concentration (mg/l)

% c

ontro

l val

ue

2003/651

CT

Caspofungin increases efficacy and relative potency of delafloxacinagainst a recalcitrant stain

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 31

Caspofungin-fluoroquinolone combinations

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

The combination works for two FQs

and against several strains, but to different

extents …

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 32

Caspofungin increases FQ potency within biofilms

The combination works for two FQs and against several strains,

but to different extents …

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 33

Caspofungin increases fluoroquinolone activity in vitro and in vivo

Cat

hete

rs in

vitr

o

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

Cat

hete

rs in

viv

o

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 34

Caspofungin increases fluoroquinolone activity in vitro and in vivo

Caspofungin makes fluoroquinolones active at lower concentrations

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 35

Caspofungin increases fluoroquinolone penetration

CAS fluoroquinolone

penetration in biofilms

(strain dependent)

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 36

Effect of caspofungin on PNAG in biofilm matrix

CAS poly-N-acetylglucosamine content in biofilms

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

Poly-N-acetylglucosamine

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 37

Effect of caspofungin on PNAG in biofilm matrix

CAS poly-N-acetylglucosamine content and polymerization in biofilms

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

Poly-N-acetylglucosamine

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 38

IacA and polysaccharide synthesis in S. aureus

Otto et al., Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009; 7:555-67

Ica A is involved in N-acetylglucosamine homopolymer synthesis

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 39

Caspofungin, an unexpected IcaA inhibitor !

strain icaAexpression

ATCC33591 1

2011S027 1.8 ± 0.5*

2003/1083 4.0 ± 0.6 *

2009S025 2.5 ± 0.5*

2005/104 4.2 ± 0.4*

2005/179 6.0 ± 0.9*

2009S028 4.1 ± 0.2*

2003/651 16.3 ± 0.7*

CAS inhibits IcaA and increases FQ potencyin inverse proportion

to icaA expression

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 40

The antifungal caspofungin as an inhibitor of polysaccharide synthesis

Candida albicans

Adapted from Arnold, Kucer’s 6the edition

Glucan synthase

Atkin et al, FEBS Lett. 2014;588:1869-72

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 41

Caspofungin, an unexpected IcaA inhibitor ?

IcaA is homologous to glucan synthases (caspofungin target in fungi)

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 42

Caspofungin as a prototype for icaA inhibitors

Siala et al, Nature Communications 2016; 7:13286

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 43

Antibiofilm strategies under study in the lab …

Kostakioti et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2013;3:a010306

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 44

New clinical applications

1. Infections on medical devices

This is not the main

reason for contamination

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 45

Biofilms on endoscopes and cleaning procedures

https://www.educationaldimensions.com/eLearn/biofilm/photograph.php

glutaraldehyde/alcool

paracetic acid

removal of air/water noozle

manual cleaninguncleaned colonoscope

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 46

Importance of cleaning procedure

No biofilmbiofilm

Ren-Pei et al, Am J Infect Control 2014; 42:1203-6

GARUDA A B C D E F G H I J0

5

10

15

cleaner

Nb

of b

iofil

ms

rem

oved

of >

50%

by

clea

ner

GARUDA A B C D E F G H I J0

5

10

15

cleaner

Nb

of b

iofil

ms

not a

ffect

edby

cle

aner

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 47

Efficacy of biofilm-removing detergents

Siala et al, unpublished

In vitro evaluation of 12 detergent solutions against 15 biofilms from different species

High variability in capacity to act upon biofilms among detergents

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 48

Efficacy of biofilm-removing detergents

UNTREATED CLEANER A

GARUDA CLEANER J

Siala et al, unpublished

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 49

Efficacy of biofilm-removing detergents

AER: Automated Endoscope Reprocessors

Siala et al, unpublished

Ex vivo efficacy of GARUDA® for endoscope cleaning

GARUDA® removes most of remaining contamination

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 50

New clinical applications

2. Infections on catheters

Von Eiff, Lancet ID 2002; 2:677-685

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 51

New clinical applications

Infections on catheters

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 52

Lock therapy and catheter-related infections

Lebeaux et al. Lancet ID 2014;14:146-59.

Totally implanted venous access catheters

• Closed system but accessible to colonisation• Possibility to follow colonisation

in the chamber, in the catheter, the related infection

Antibiotic lock solution

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 53

Antibiotic lock therapy: current practice

Lebeaux et al, Lancet ID 2014; 14:146–159

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 54

Antibiotic lock therapy: current practice

Lebeaux et al, Lancet ID 2014; 14:146–159

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 55

Antibiotic lock therapy: current practice

Lebeaux et al, Lancet ID 2014; 14:146–159

VAN/cefazolin AmpB/CASFQ/AGVAN/AG

EtOH

50-80 % success > 50 % failure

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 56

Antibiotic locks: clinical efficacy

Van de Wetering et al, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013; 11

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 57

Anti-coagulant + antibiotic locks: clinical efficacy

Van de Wetering et al, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013; 11

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 58

Lock therapy in the lab: screening of antibiotics

Fernandez-Hidalgo et al, J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 525–530

Hogan et al, Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:5968-75.

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 59

Aminoglycosides + EDTA

Hogan et al, Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:6310-18.

cont

rol

Gen

ta+

EDTA

control Genta + EDTA

Genta + EDTA : highly synergistic combination

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 60

Modulation of gentamicin activity: L-Arginine

Lebeaux et al, J. Infect. Dis. 2014; 210; 1357–66.

In vitro synergismO

O

O

CH2H3N

NH3

OH

H2NH3C

CH3OH

HO

H3NO NH3

O

O

O

CH2H2N

NH2

OH

HNH3C

CH3OH

HO

H2NO NH2

L-Arginine improves Genta activity by increasing pH

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 61

Modulation of gentamicin activity: L-Arg

Lebeaux et al, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015; 70:1704-1712

In vivo synergismL-Arg; basic

pH

L-Arg; neutral

pHneutral

pH

In vivo, some of the L-Arg effects are pH independent

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 62

Grafting non-biocidal anti-adhesion molec. on catheters

Surface of the TIVAP

Titanium (Ti)

or Silicon (Si)

Polymer brush

Chauhan et al. J. Infect. Dis. 2014; 210:1347–1356.

Si

Si-Ti

Coating prevents bacterial adhesion

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 63

Grafting non-biocidal anti-adhesion molec. on catheters

Chauhan et al. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2014; 210:1347–1356.

adherence colonization at day 5

CT

Si

Si-Ti

Coating prevents bacterial adhesionand further colonization

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 64

New clinical applications

3. Orthopedic infections

biofilm observed in electron microscopy on a steel component of an Ilizarov device

obtained from a patient with clinical infection (S. aureus)

Bartoszewicz et al; Orttopediia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja 2007; 9:310-8

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 65

Evidence for biofilm in orthopedic infectionsIncreased risk of treatment failure for biofilmogenic

S. epidermidis in Device-Related Osteomyelitis of the Lower Extremity in Human Patients

Morgensten et al, J Orthop Res. 2016 doi: 10.1002/jor.23218.

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 66

Evidence for biofilm in orthopedic infectionsPersistent isolates of S. aureus are higher biofilms producers ….

Trouillet-Assant et al, Cellular Microbiology 2016; 18:1405–14

Biomaterials for antibiotic delivery

Available prophylactic biomaterials vehicles:

a. Collagen (hypersensitivity, poor handling)b-c: PMMA [methylmetacrylate] beads or spacers (non degradable)d. PDLLA [poly-D,L-lactide] (acidic degradation products)e. Calcium sulfates (osteoconductive)

ter Boo et al, Biomaterials 2015, 52:113-25.

a b c d e

Images: Dr. Mario Morgenstern BGU Murnau, Germany; Dr Menendez, Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, CA

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 67

Biomaterials for antibiotic delivery

Variable antibiotic release from commercial cements

ter Boo et al, Biomaterials 2015, 52:113-25.16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 68

Antibiotic-loaded bone cements: clinical experience

Iarikov et al., Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:1474-80 16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 69

New developments: an example

Thermoresponsive Hyaluronanhydrogel

Ter Boo et al., Acta Biomaterialia 2016; 43:185–194

Rapid release of gentamicin from the gel; low serum levels

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 70

New developments: an example

Ter Boo et al., Acta Biomaterialia 2016; 43:185–194

Thermoresponsive Hyaluronanhydrogel

Genta-loaded hydrogelreduces infection

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 71

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics 72

Take home messages

Antibiotic activity poor against biofilms due to PK/PD issues

Combinations with adjuvants effective in animal models

Prevention easier than cure …

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics

Acknowledgments

Patrick Van DijckWafi Siala Sona Kucharíková

73

Julia Bauer

16/11/2016 biofilms in vitro & clinics

Disclosures

74

• Research grant from Melinta therapeutics (delafloxacin)

• First entreprise program of the Region wallonne with OneLIFE(Specialized medical cleaning)

top related