american society of naval engineers (asne) brief rdml jeff harley president, board of inspection and...
Post on 28-Dec-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE) Brief
RDML Jeff Harley
President, Board of Inspection and Survey
31 July 2014
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
U.S. Code Title 10Section 7304. Examination by Board
(a) The Secretary of the Navy shall designate Boards of Naval Officers to examine Naval vessels … Each vessel shall be examined at least once every three years, if practicable.
(b) A Board designated under subsection (a) shall submit to the Secretary in writing its recommendations as to which vessels, if any, among those it examined should be stricken from the Naval Vessel Register.
MissionInspect the Fleet’s in-service and new construction ships,
determine their material readiness, and report this assessment to Congress and Navy Leadership.
3
Legal Authority And Mission
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
• Inspect Naval Vessels and recommend to SECNAV which to strike from the Naval Vessel Register.
• Inspect ships to determine fitness for service, through trials, material inspections, and surveys.
• Identify performance capabilities and material conditions which limit mission capability.
• Compile statistical information on material deficiencies.• Develop and maintain Fleet-wide standardized assessment
procedures … and metrics.
4
Why Do We Exist?
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
MATERIAL INSPECTIONS (MI): 35 so far this fiscal year: 25 surface ships, 8 submarines, and 2 CVNs.
- Surface MI trends: Of the 20 surface functional areas inspected, none are significantly down although Aviation and Habitability are trending toward “degraded.” Aviation was degraded primarily by JP-5 fuel system problems, and habitability was degraded due to emergency egress panels, electrical safety, and leakage from fuel tank coverings into berthing spaces.
- Submarines continue to score well in all areas except Information Systems.
- CVN scores were at or above historical averages in all areas except Information Systems.
TRIALS: 7 trials conducted year to date. There are 6 trials scheduled for the 4th quarter including a one-day Special Trial on LCS 2. This past quarter included the first ever Final Contract Trial on an LCS 2 variant, the USS CORONADO LCS 4.
Inspection Findings
5
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
5-Year Fleet IFOM Average
*No CVN MIs conducted in 2013.
Fleet: 43
Surface: 27
CVN: 2
Sub: 14
Fleet: 43
Surface: 25
CVN: 3
Sub: 15
Fleet: 30
Surface: 19
CVN: 1
Sub: 10
Fleet: 39
Surface: 30
CVN: 0
Sub: 9
Fleet: 35
Surface: 25
CVN: 2
Sub: 8
6
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
8
Resourced Level
Acceptable Readiness
Design Standard (Ship Specs)
0
100
Below Acceptable Readiness
80
INSURV Readiness Measures
• Ships historical IFOM (and other resourcing levels) is approx 80%• Above 80% is thus not resourced• Scoring attributes above 80% skew ship’s force performance• Two actions: (1) as a separate INSURV score, adjust 80% as the resourced norm
(2) normalize scoring matrix for “ship’s force capable” and Program of Record shortfalls
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey9
Audits
OPNAVINST 4700.7L directs INSURV to audit and validate material condition metrics. To this end, INSURV conducts maintenance process audits. Summary highlights below:
• Class Maintenance Plan (CMP) accomplishment: – Surface force remains steady at 92% as recorded by the technical community for
FY14, up from 72% in 2010. – Submarine and CVN compliance remains strong and is only spot-checked.
• Surface Ship Tank & Void assessments reveal that the material condition of 92% of T&Vs is known, up from 87% last year.
• Surface Ship Hull Structure assessments reveal that the material condition of 66% of Hull Structures is known, up from 61% last year.
• Modernization audits reveal both fewer temporary alterations remaining onboard past scheduled removal date and fewer alteration installations that were reported complete with missing items than last year.
• Manpower and Training audit commenced this year and reveals that ships are manned to 93% with 82% of required NECs onboard.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
Surface EOC Scores
Definitions:0.00 – 0.03: STEADY0.04 – 0.08: UP / DOWN >0.08: SIGNIFICANTLY UP / DOWN
3 of 20 Functional Area scores have IMPROVED over 2013, while 6 DECLINED.
Functional Areas 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014TRENDS
2014 vs 2013(Ships Inspected) (27) (25) (19) (30) (25)
Main Propulsion 0.79 0.79 0.85 0.85 0.80 DOWN
Auxiliaries 0.77 0.81 0.88 0.87 0.89 STEADY
Electrical 0.80 0.83 0.85 0.85 0.87 STEADY
Damage Control 0.73 0.83 0.77 0.78 0.74 DOWN
Deck 0.66 0.81 0.85 0.87 0.83 DOWN
Mine Warfare 0.76 0.87 0.83 0.79 0.88 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
Anti-Sub Warfare 0.86 0.89 0.78 0.78 0.80 STEADY
Operations 0.82 0.83 0.85 0.82 0.82 STEADY
Navigation 0.87 0.87 0.90 0.90 0.89 STEADY
Weapons Systems 0.81 0.84 0.76 0.76 0.81 UP
Communications 0.78 0.83 0.81 0.83 0.82 STEADY
Information Systems 0.85 0.85 0.83 0.67 0.61 DOWN*
Aviation 0.83 0.83 0.86 0.85 0.79 DOWN
Supply 0.85 0.87 0.83 0.84 0.83 STEADY
Habitability 0.85 0.87 0.83 0.83 0.79 DOWN
NAVOSH 0.80 0.81 0.87 0.90 0.93 STEADY
Ventilation 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.76 0.83 UP
Environmental Protection 0.71 0.79 0.83 0.83 0.83 STEADY
Medical 0.90 0.93 0.95 0.93 0.95 STEADY
Preservation 0.68 0.81 0.85 0.86 0.86 STEADY
10
* INSURV began an enhancedinspection of Information Systems in 2013.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
Surface Demos
Definitions:0.00 – 0.03: STEADY0.04 – 0.08: UP / DOWN >0.08: SIGNIFICANTLY UP / DOWN
3 of 12 demos scores have IMPROVED over 2013; 4 have DECLINED.
Demos 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TRENDS2014 vs 2013
Full Power Ahead 0.79 0.80 0.81 0.86 0.73 SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN
Quick Reversal Astern 0.89 0.77 0.95 0.92 0.83 SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN
Quick Reversal Ahead 0.90 0.81 0.98 0.91 0.82 SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN
Steering 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.95 0.96 STEADY
Anchoring 0.69 0.88 0.93 0.96 0.94 STEADY
AD DTE 0.78 0.83 0.75 0.74 0.73 STEADY
Self Defense DTE 0.78 0.83 0.72 0.66 0.70 UP
BMD NA NA 0.81 0.78 .78 STEADY
USW DTE 0.84 0.95 0.72 0.77 0.82 UP
Ballast 0.83 1.00 0.88 0.85 0.91 UP
Mine Sweeping 0.49 0.82 0.67 0.79 0.80 STEADY
Mine Hunting 0.28 0.87 0.78 0.85 0.66 SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN
11
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
Surface Worst 10 For 2014 Worst 10 of 184 sub-systems. Ranked by lowest % of SAT/green.
(Numbers in bars indicate ships inspected)
12
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
Submarine EOC Scores
Definitions:0.00 – 0.03: STEADY0.04 – 0.08: UP / DOWN >0.08: SIGNIFICANTLY UP / DOWN
13 of 16 EOC scores have remained STEADY from 2013; 3 have DECLINED.
Functional Areas 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TRENDS (Boats Inspected) (14) (15) (10) (9) (8) 2014 vs 2013
Main Propulsion 0.88 0.86 0.90 0.89 0.89 STEADY
Auxiliaries 0.86 0.84 0.80 0.85 0.84 STEADY
Electrical 0.86 0.84 0.83 0.86 0.86 STEADY
Damage Control 0.86 0.87 0.89 0.88 0.86 STEADY
Weapons 0.82 0.84 0.85 0.81 0.80 STEADY
Navigation 0.87 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.89 DOWN
Operations 0.83 0.90 0.87 0.90 0.87 STEADY
Information Systems 0.87 0.91 0.90 0.88 0.64 SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN*
Deck 0.86 0.87 0.90 0.92 0.93 STEADY
Supply 0.82 0.83 0.81 0.86 0.81 DOWN
Habitability 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.92 0.91 STEADY
NAVOSH 0.80 0.79 0.83 0.85 0.88 STEADY
Environmental Protection 0.83 0.86 0.85 0.88 0.91 STEADY
Survivability/Escape 0.81 0.81 0.82 0.86 0.85 STEADY
Medical NA 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.93 STEADY
Preservation 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.89 STEADY
13
* INSURV began an enhancedinspection of Information Systems in 2014.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
Submarine Demos
Definitions:0.00 – 0.03: STEADY0.04 – 0.08: UP / DOWN >0.08: SIGNIFICANTLY UP / DOWN
Demos 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TRENDS2014 vs 2013
Full Power Ahead 0.90 0.91 0.90 0.91 0.92 STEADY
Quick Reversal Astern 0.82 0.92 0.87 0.88 0.93 UP
Quick Reversal Ahead 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 STEADY
Steering 0.81 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.97 STEADY
Anchoring 0.69 0.65 0.84 0.75 0.84 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
Angles 0.84 0.84 0.91 0.87 0.88 STEADY
External Countermeasures NA NA NA 0.96 0.93 STEADY
2 of 7 demos scores have IMPROVED over 2013; none have DECLINED.
14
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
Submarine Worst 10 For 2014 Worst 10 of 72 sub-systems. Ranked by lowest % of SAT/green.
(Numbers in bars indicate ships inspected)
15
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
CVN EOC Scores
Definitions:0.00 – 0.03: STEADY0.04 – 0.08: UP / DOWN >0.08: SIGNIFICANTLY UP / DOWN
Functional Areas(ships inspected)
2010(4)
2011(1)
2012(1)
2013(0)
2014(2)
TRENDS 2014 VS 2012
Main Propulsion 0.78 0.71 0.86 0.83 STEADY
Auxiliaries 0.72 0.87 0.88 0.81 DOWN
Electrical 0.76 0.90 0.78 0.82 UP
Damage Control 0.65 0.81 0.55 0.69 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
Deck 0.62 0.84 0.73 0.87 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
Operations 0.81 0.87 0.77 0.80 STEADY
Navigation 0.79 0.85 0.88 0.90 STEADY
Weapons Systems 0.79 0.86 0.74 0.81 UP
Communication 0.74 0.75 0.78 0.85 UP
Information Systems 0.82 0.88 0.85 0.58 SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN*
Aviation 0.87 0.79 0.91 0.84 DOWN
Supply 0.79 0.82 0.69 0.74 UP
Habitability 0.82 0.92 0.78 0.80 STEADY
NAVOSH 0.78 0.84 0.83 0.88 UP
Ventilation 0.70 0.74 0.62 0.89 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
Environmental Protection
0.76 0.86 0.76 0.96 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
Medical 0.90 0.82 0.92 0.90 STEADY
Preservation 0.71 0.87 0.79 0.88 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
1610 of 18 Functional Area scores have IMPROVED over 2012, while 3 DECLINED.
* INSURV began an enhancedinspection of Information Systems in 2014.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
CVN Demos
Definitions:0.00 – 0.03: STEADY0.04 – 0.08: UP / DOWN >0.08: SIGNIFICANTLY UP / DOWN
Demos 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TRENDS 2014 VS 2012
Full Power Ahead 0.76 0.81 0.47 0.75 SIGNIFICANTLY UP
Quick Reversal Astern 0.80 0.33 0.32 0.88 SIGNIFICANTLY
UP
Quick Reversal Ahead 0.72 0.68 0.59 0.87 SIGNIFICANTLY
UP
Steering 0.72 0.30 0.98 0.76 SIGNIFICANTLY DOWN
Anchoring 0.61 0.90 0.78 0.80 STEADY
Self Defense DTE 0.78 0.90 0.67 0.65 STEADY
17
3 of 6 demos scores have IMPROVED over 2012; 1 has DECLINED.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
CVN Worst 10 For 2014 Worst 10 of 144 sub-systems. Ranked by lowest % of SAT/green.
(Numbers in bars indicate ships inspected)
18
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
INSURV Initiatives(Complete)
OBJECTIVE HOW ACHIEVED RESULT
• Safer • 0700 underway time• All events complete by
2200• Tuesday start
• ORM compliant
• Increase efficiency • Eliminated outdated requirements
• 3-days vice 5-days
• More data • Leveraging linkages from other material assessments
• Exploiting Mid-Cycle data
• 2X assessment data
• Reduce costs • 3-days vice 5-days • Travel costs reduced by up to 40%
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
INSURV Initiatives(In Progress)
OBJECTIVE HOW ACHIEVED RESULT
• Reduce RMC workload • PMS checks conducted during TMIT/READ-E-7
• Two part inspection, but RMC workload and costs reduced by up to 50%
• Relevant scoring • Develop “ship capable” in addition to design score
• Started in July
• Enables analysis of operational readiness
• More realistic functional area scores (less prep)
• Relevant timing • Annual report based on fiscal vice calendar year
• Can better inform testimony season
• Expand analysis capacity • Partnerships with CNA, NSWC Corona, and FAC
• More staff analysts
• Be able to answer the “so what” questions
20Creating a smarter INSURV!
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
SignificantlyBelow
Average
Below Average Average
AboveAverage
Excellent
TwoStandard
Deviations
OneStandardDeviation
MeanTwo
StandardDeviations
OneStandardDeviation
68%
13.5%13.5%
2.5% 2.5%
Ships Capable Grading
22
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
Contact Us:
INSURV_LTLC_FEEDBACK@navy.milOr
Jeffrey.Harley@navy.mil
23
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey
5 - Year Score Trend
FiscalYear
Material InspectionsMajor Mission Degrades
0 1 >1
MI Rate0 Mission Degrades
Trial InspectionsMajor Mission Degrades
0 1 >1
Trial Rate0 Mission Degrades
2010 33 – 9 – 1 80% 14 – 0 – 1 93%
2011 34 – 5 – 4 81% 14 – 0 – 1 93%
2012 24 – 5 – 1 81% 11 – 2 – 0 85%
2013 32 – 6 – 1 81% 14 – 1 – 0 93%
2014 29 – 3 – 3 83% 6 – 0 – 1 86%
24
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Board of Inspection and Survey* Rank is a rolling average over past five years of inspections.
FY 2014 IFOM Results
Ship IFOM Rank*
BUNKER HILL (CG 52) 0.80 12 of 19CAPE ST GEORGE (CG 71) 0.85 3 of 19
ARLEIGH BURKE (DDG 51) 0.81 30 of 46JOHN PAUL JONES (DDG 53) 0.86 13 of 46FITZGERALD (DDG 62) 0.87 11 of 46ROSS (DDG 71) 0.84 21 of 46DECATUR (DDG 73) 0.77 39 of 46
DONALD COOK (DDG 75) 0.86 15 of
46
O’KANE (DDG 77) 0.78 37 of
46SHOUP (DDG 86) 0.69 45 of 46JAMES E WILLIAMS (DDG 95) 0.84 20 of 46
TRUXTUN (DDG 103) 0.83 26 of
46STERETT (DDG 104) 0.83 25 of 46DEWEY (DDG 105) 0.73 44 of 46
MESA VERDE (LPD 19) 0.73 4 of 4
THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN 71)
0.83 1 of 6
HARRY S TRUMAN (CVN 75) 0.78 2 of 6
Ship IFOM Rank*
VANDEGRIFT (FFG 48) 0.82 11 of 17GARY (FFG 51) 0.69 17 of 17ELROD (FFG 55) 0.87 2 of 17RODNEY M DAVIS (FFG 60) 0.86 5 of 17INGRAHAM (FFG 61) 0.81 12 of 17
COMSTOCK (LSD 45) 0.69 5 of 5
DEVASTATOR (MCM 6) 0.85 7 of 10PATRIOT (MCM 7) 0.89 2 of 10
TYPHOON (PC 5) 0.95 1 of 8WHIRLWIND (PC 11) 0.93 3 of 8
OHIO (SSGN 726) 0.82 16 of 17NEBRASKA (SSBN 736) 0.82 15 of 17RHODE ISLAND (SSBN 740) 0.88 2 of 17
BREMERTON (SSN 698) 0.82 36 of 41
PITTSBURGH (SSN 720) 0.90 5 of 41
PASADENA (SSN 752) 0.89 7 of 41SANTA FE (SSN 763) 0.84 28 of 41TOLEDO (SSN 769) 0.87 11 of 41
25
top related