aia iowa #a203 course title ensuring compliance of fenestration with today’s energy codes and...
Post on 02-Apr-2015
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
AIA Iowa #A203
Course Title Ensuring compliance of FENESTRATION WITH TODAY’S ENERGY CODES and green standards
Speaker: David WardenDate September 26, 2014 1:15 PM
Credit(s) earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request.
This course is registered with AIA
CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner ofhandling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product.___________________________________________Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.
This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the
presentation without written permission of the speaker is prohibited.
Copyright Materials
Fastening Products Architectural Products
Commercial Glazing Systems
Entrances
Curtain Walls
Windows & Balcony Doors
Residential Glazing Systems
Windows & Patio Doors
6.4 Billion $ in Sales
111 Companies
71 Countries
39,000 Employees/Team Members
1,760 Employees in the USA
Zippers
Webbings
Metal Snaps & Buttons
Plastic Buckles & Notions
Hook & Loop (Self Closing Tape)
CourseDescription
Understanding energy code changes and green standards as they relate to energy
performance of Aluminum commercial fenestration systems specifically thermal
performance characteristics of an elevation and using these products
effectively in green strategies.
LearningObjectives
Understand recent changes to energy codes and the new green standards
Learn how to pre-qualify thermal performance for a project
Determine when to use performance results based on NFRC sizes and project specific sizes
Work toward sustainable performance with aluminum commercial fenestration
What are the recent Energy Code and Green Standard
changes and requirements?
ASHRAE 90.1 - 2004ASHRAE 90.1 – 2007ASHRAE 90.1 – 2010ASHRAE 90.1 – 2013
ASHRAE 189.1 – 2009ASHRAE 189.1 – 2011
Energy Code Map Status update as of August 2014
www.bcap-ocean.org/ code-status-commercial
www.iccsafe.org www.energycodes.gov
www.bcap-ocean.org/ code-status-commercial
International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
International green Construction Code (IgCC)
Curtain Wall
Window Wall
Storefront
Fixed Windows (ASHRAE 90.1-2013 Only)
Fixed Fenestration
U-Factor Requirements of (Non-Residential Heated Space) Fixed FenestrationBased on Vertical Glazing of 0-40%Code Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
Standard Codes
ASHRAE 90.1-2004 1.22 1.22 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.46ASHRAE 90.1-2007 1.20 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40ASHRAE 90.1-2010 1.20 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40ASHRAE 90.1-2013 0.57 0.57 0.50 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.382006 IECC 1.20 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.452009 IECC 1.20 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.402012 IECC1 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.29 0.292015 IECC1 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.29 0.29
Green Codes
2012 IgCC1 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.34 0.34 0.32 0.26 0.26ASHRAE 189.1-2009 1.20 0.70 0.50 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30ASHRAE 189.1-20113 1.20 0.70 0.50 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30ASHRAE K-122 0.56 0.45 0.45 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.33 0.331 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-30%2 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-35%3 Vertical Glazing less than 40%
Operable FenestrationOperable Windows
Fixed Windows (90.1-2013)
Sliding Glass Doors
Terrace Doors
U-Factor Requirements of (Non-Residential Heated Space) Operable WindowsBased on Vertical Glazing of 0-40%Code Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
Standard Codes
ASHRAE 90.1-2004 1.27 1.27 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.47ASHRAE 90.1-2007 1.20 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45 0.45ASHRAE 90.1-2010 1.20 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45 0.45ASHRAE 90.1-2013 0.65 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.402006 IECC 1.20 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.50 0.502009 IECC 1.20 0.75 0.65 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45 0.452012 IECC1 0.65 0.65 0.60 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.37 0.372015 IECC1 0.65 0.65 0.60 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.37 0.37
Green Codes
2012 IgCC1 0.59 0.59 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.39 0.33 0.33ASHRAE 189.1-2009 1.20 0.75 0.55 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.35 0.35ASHRAE 189.1-20113 1.20 0.75 0.55 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.35 0.35ASHRAE K-122 0.56 0.45 0.45 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.33 0.331 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-30%
2 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-35%3 Vertical Glazing less than 40%
Glazed Entrances
Swinging Entrance Doors
U-Factor Requirements of (Non-Residential Heated Space) Glazed Entrance DoorsBased on Vertical Glazing of 0-40%Code Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
Standard Codes
ASHRAE 90.1-2004 1.27 1.27 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.47ASHRAE 90.1-2007 1.20 1.10 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80ASHRAE 90.1-2010 1.20 1.10 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80ASHRAE 90.1-2013 1.10 0.83 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.772006 IECC 1.20 1.10 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.802009 IECC 1.20 1.10 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.802012 IECC1 1.10 0.83 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.772015 IECC1 1.10 0.83 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77
Green Codes
2012 IgCC1 0.99 0.75 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69ASHRAE 189.1-2009 1.20 1.10 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70ASHRAE 189.1-20113 1.20 1.10 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70ASHRAE K-122 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.50 0.501 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-30%
2 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-35%3 Vertical Glazing less than 40%
SHGC Requirements
All Fenestration
SHGC: PF < 0.25
PF < 0.20 for 2015 IECC
Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) requirements of (Non-Residental Heated Space) Vertical FenestrationBased on Vertical Glazing of 0-40%
Code Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8
Standard Codes
ASHRAE 90.1-2004 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.49 NRASHRAE 90.1-2007 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45ASHRAE 90.1-2010 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45
ASHRAE 90.1-2013 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.452006 IECC 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 NR NR2009 IECC 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45
2012 IECC1 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45
2015 IECC1 0.25/0.33 0.25/0.33 0.25/0.33 0.40/0.53 0.40/0.53 0.40/0.53 0.45/NR 0.45/NR
Green Codes
2012 IgCC1 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.41 0.41ASHRAE 189.1-2009 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.45
ASHRAE 189.1-20113 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.45
ASHRAE K-122 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.451 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-30%
2 Based on Vertical Glazing of 0-35%
3 Vertical Glazing less than 40%
Fenestration Industry’s response Fixed Framing
Extra Thermally Enhanced Storefronts and Curtain Walls with U-factors under 0.39 Btu/hr.ft2.oF (W/m2.oC)
18% Better U-factor performance
Thermal Comparisons
Dual Thermal
0° 70°
(THERMALLY BROKEN)
Surface 4.8°
Surface 42.4°
Thermal Break Vs Dual Thermal Break
Thermal Break Vs Dual Thermal Break
0° 70°
(DUAL THERMAL BREAK)
Surface 3.8°
Surface 48.1°
0° 70°
(THERMALLY IMPROVED)
Surface 10.1°
Surface 49.2°
Thermal Break Vs Thermally Improved
Thermal Break Vs Thermally Improved
0° 70°
(THERMALLY IMPROVED & BROKEN)
Surface 6.6°
Surface 57.4°
18 to 20% Better U-factor performance
Fenestration Industry’s response Operable Windows
Extra Thermal Window designs achieving U-factors in the 0.40 to 0.35 range with C.O.G. U-factors of 0.29
29% to 31% Better U-factor performance
Fenestration Industry’s response Entrances
Thermal Doors achieving U-factors in the 0.50 to 0.60 range with C.O.G. U-factors of 0.29
Exterior doors are one of the leading energy loss areas in a building
30 to 37% Better U-factor performance
How much can extra thermal systems Improve Thermal Performance?
EXTRA EXTRA EXTRAEXTRA EXTRA
High Performance Storefront System Analysis (Performance vs Price)
High Performance CW System Analysis (Performance vs Price)
High Performance Window System Analysis (Performance vs Price)
High Performance Window System Analysis (Performance vs Price)
High Performance Entrance System Analysis (Performance vs Price)
ASHRAE 90.1 – 2007 & 2010
5.8.2 Fenestration and Doors
5.8.2.2 Labeling of fenestration Products. All manufactured fenestration products shall have a permanent nameplate, installed by the manufacturer, listing the U-factor, SHGC, and air leakage rate. 2010 also requires “Visible Transmittance (VT)”
Exception: When the fenestration product does not have a nameplate, the installer or supplier of such fenestration shall provided a signed and dated certification for the installed fenestration listing the U-factor, SHGC, and the air leakage rate.
303.1.3 Fenestration product rating. U-factors of fenestration products (windows, doors and Skylights) shall be determined in accordance with NFRC 100 by an accredited, independent laboratory, and labeled and certified by the manufacturer. Products lacking such a labeled U-factor shall be assigned a default U-factor from Table 303.1.3(1) or 303.1.3(2). The solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) of the glazed fenestration products (windows, glazed doors and skylights) shall be determined in accordance with NFRC 200 by an accredited, independent laboratory, and labeled and certified by the manufacturer. Products lacking such a labeled SHGC shall be assigned a default SHGC from table 303.1.3(3).
2009 IECC
2006 & 2009 IECC - Require Air Leakage labeling, but site –constructed windows and doors do not require labels. Curtain Wall and Storefront can be handled with ASTM E 283 Test Reports
Code Requirements
• Thermal Transmittance (U-factor)• Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC)• Visible Transmittance (VT)• Air Leakage (AL)
Does not effect energy use• Condensation Resistance Factor (CRF)
AAMA 507
PurposeA standard method for determining the thermal performance of building specific fenestration systems – The specific elevation
Thermal Characteristics to be discussed:
Scope
Standard Practice for Determining the Thermal Performance Characteristics of Fenestration Systems Installed in Commercial Buildings
How do we pre-qualify thermal performance of a fenestration system?
U-Factor: Rate of heat loss. The lower the U-factor the better the fenestration’s resistance to heat flow.
U-Factor is denoted as BTU/hr.ft2.oF (W/m2.oC)U-factor is the inverse of R-Value
From our previous example: 1 / 0.46 = 2.2 R-value
Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC): Ratio of the solar heat gain entering the space through the fenestration product to the incident solar radiation. The lower the SHGC, the less solar heat it transmits, and the greater its shading ability.
SHGC is denoted as a value between 0 and 1 without units.
Visible Transmittance (VT): Optical property that indicates the amount of visible light transmitted. The higher the VT the better the quality of daylight allowed thru the fenestration system. Note: The framing blocks all daylight.
VT is denoted as a value between 0 and 1, but most VT values fall between 0.30 and 0.80.
Defining the thermal characteristics of fenestration systems
Air Leakage (AL): Rate of air infiltration thru a fenestration system. Energy efficiency is lost as air passes thru a fenestration system therefore the lower the AL value the better. Choose systems with a 0.30 cfm/ft2 or preferably better.
AL is denoted as cubic feet per minute per square feet of opening - cfm/ft2
Condensation Resistance Factor (CRF): Is a ratio of the difference between an average inside surface temperature and the outside air temperature, and the difference between the inside air temperature and the outside air temperature. The higher the CRF, the higher the resistance to condensation.
CRF is denoted as a dimensionless rating number between 0 and 100 obtained under standard test conditions as prescribed in AAMA 1503 .
Referenced in AAMA 507 although it does not effect energy use, but is still an important thermal performance characteristic
CRF (g) = CRF Glass
CRF (f) = CRF Frame
TI = Warm Side Air Temperature
TII = Cold Side Air Temperature
CRF Prediction Formulas
CRF (g) = X 100gT – TII
TI - TII
CRF (f) = X 100fT – TII
TI - TII
gT = Glass Temperature Warm Side
fT = Frame Temperature Warm Side
Defining the thermal characteristics of fenestration systems
Pre-qualifies a Products ability tomeet & exceed code requirementswith a variety of glazing options.
Submit for Code Compliance
Consultative Sales * Estimating performance * Glass Spec check
U-Factor:(Btu/h•ft2•oF)
SHGC:
Certificate AuthorizationName: Company:
Signature: Date:
PROJECT INFORMATION:
Street Adress:
City: State: Zip:
GLAZING CONTRACTOR / INSTALLER: Contact Person:
Street Adress: Phone Number:
City: State: Zip:
GLAZING MATERIAL SUPPLIER: Contact Person:
Street Adress: Phone Number:
City: State: Zip:
Glass and Spacer Type:
Center-of-glass (C.O.G.) U-Factor: Center-of-glass (C.O.G.) SHGC:
Btu/h•ft2•oF
FRAMING MATERIAL SUPPLIER: Contact Person:
Street Adress: Phone Number:
City: State: Zip:
Product Line:
C.O.G. OVERALL C.O.G OVERALLU-Factor U-Factor SHGC SHGC
0.48 0.61 0.75 0.69
0.46 0.59 0.70 0.65 The overall ratings for U-factor and SHGC are based on a size of
0.44 0.58 0.65 0.60
0.42 0.56 0.60 0.56 2000 mm x 2000 mm (78 3/4 in x 78 3/4 in) as required in NFRC 100
0.40 0.55 0.55 0.51
0.38 0.53 0.50 0.47
0.36 0.51 0.45 0.42
0.34 0.50 0.40 0.38
0.32 0.48 0.35 0.33
0.30 0.46 0.30 0.29 ACCREDITED LABORATORY::
0.28 0.45 0.25 0.24
0.26 0.43 0.20 0.20
0.24 0.42 0.15 0.15 Reference Test Report #:
0.22 0.40 0.10 0.11
0.20 0.38 0.05 0.06
Overall U-factors and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients (SHGC) linisted in the matrix were determined in accordance with NFRC 100 and NFRC 200 respectively by a NFRC accredited laboratory.
1234.50 - 10
XYZ Labs
TA
BL
E 1
- G
LA
ZIN
GT
AB
LE
2 -
FR
AM
ING
U-Factor Matrix (Btu/h•ft2•oF) SHGC Matrix
CERTIFICATE of COMPLIANCE
STOREFRONT
CERTIFIES THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE WERE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT IDENTIFIED BELOW
10.0 - Certificate of Compliance
OVERALL RATING
Directions: Fill out form completely. Determine the Overall Rating for this project by using the C.O.G. U-Factor and C.O.G. SHGC from Table 1 and looking up the overall rating from Table 2. Indicate the Overall Rating in the space above. Linear interpolation is permitted.
FRAMING MATERIAL SUPPLIER: Contact Person:
Street Adress: Phone Number:
City: State: Zip:
Product Line:
C.O.G. OVERALL C.O.G OVERALLU-Factor U-Factor SHGC SHGC
0.48 0.61 0.75 0.69
0.46 0.59 0.70 0.65 The overall ratings for U-factor and SHGC are based on a size of
0.44 0.58 0.65 0.60
0.42 0.56 0.60 0.56 2000 mm x 2000 mm (78 3/4 in x 78 3/4 in) as required in NFRC 100
0.40 0.55 0.55 0.51
0.38 0.53 0.50 0.47
0.36 0.51 0.45 0.42
0.34 0.50 0.40 0.38
0.32 0.48 0.35 0.33
0.30 0.46 0.30 0.29 ACCREDITED LABORATORY::
0.28 0.45 0.25 0.24
0.26 0.43 0.20 0.20
0.24 0.42 0.15 0.15 Reference Test Report #:
0.22 0.40 0.10 0.11
0.20 0.38 0.05 0.06
Overall U-factors and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients (SHGC) linisted in the matrix were determined in accordance with NFRC 100 and NFRC 200 respectively by a NFRC accredited laboratory.
1234.50 - 10
XYZ Labs
TA
BL
E 2
- F
RA
MIN
G
U-Factor Matrix (Btu/h•ft2•oF) SHGC Matrix
STOREFRONT
AAMA 507 Develops a “Certificate of Compliance”
0.46 0.38
Why is Thermal Performance of specific elevations important?
Energy Software analysis and modeling – Energyplus, OpenStudio, Energy-10, Radiance, DOE-2 etc.
Determine % over LEED Baseline (LEED projects)
Payback analysis
HVAC sizing requirements
Annual energy costs predictions
Comparisons
AAMA 507 PurposeA standard method for determining the thermal performance of building specific fenestration systems – The specific elevation
Determining the Elevations Performance
Calculating a Storefront Elevation
Elevation 1
Typical Storefront
Information Required:
1. Request Elevation Drawings2. Determine Proper System3. Request Proposed Glass or Glass
Spec.4. Request “Center of Glass” (COG)
U-Factor and “Center of Glass” Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC)
5. Proper AAMA 507 test report*
• Understand that AAMA 507 test reports will be different for windows (Fixed, Awning, Casement) and Hurricane Products (Wet, Dry, LMI or SMI) .
Calculating a Storefront Elevation
The intermediate mullion is consider a jamb that contributes equally to the left and right lites
National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) Technical Interpretation (TI)
Storefront or Window Wall
Elevation
Calculating a Storefront Elevation
Calculating a Storefront Elevation
The calculation is to determine the vision to wall ratio.
1. Elevation is Shown
2. Storefront System
3. 1” Insulated Glass Unit (IGU), ½” Aluminum spacer, air infill
4. COG U-factor = 0.29 COG SHGC = 0.38
5. AAMA 507 test report for storefront system
Information Required:
First Step is to find the vision area: ((3(48”x78”))+(3(48”x24”)))/144 = 102.00 ft2
Second Step is to find total area: (150” x 108-3/8”)/144 = 112.89 ft2
Third Step is to find the Vision Area/ Total Area (%):
(102.00 / 112.89) x 100 = 90.35%
Vision Vision Vision
Vision Vision Vision
TI
the AAMA 507 Test Report
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
Required Information:
COG U-Factor = 0.29
Vision Area / Total Area (%) = 90 %
Determining the U-factor by using
Use the Graph to find the U-Factor of a Storefront system
Fourth Step
Storefront System
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
0.42
0.29
Required Information:
U-Factor (COG) = 0.29
Vision Area / Total Area (%) = 90%
Using the Graph to find the U-Factor of the Storefront System
We Get!
Assembly U-Factor = 0.42 Btu/hr.ft2.oF
0.42
Fourth Step
0.29
the AAMA 507 Test ReportDetermining the U-factor by using
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
Storefront System
Fifth (Last ) Step
Required Information:
SHGC (COG) = 0.38
Vision to Wall Ratio = 90%
Use the Graph to find the SHGC of the Storefront System
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
the AAMA 507 Test ReportDetermining the SHGC by using
Storefront System
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
0.380.35
Storefront System
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
Assembly SHGC =
0.35
Fifth (Last ) Step
Required Information:
SHGC (COG) = 0.38
Vision to Wall Ratio = 90%
Using the Graph to find the SHGC of the Storefront System
We get!
the AAMA 507 Test ReportDetermining the SHGC by using
0.380.35
Storefront System
Calculating a Curtain Wall Elevation
National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) Technical Interpretation (TI)
Curtain Wall Elevation
The intermediate mullion is considered a jamb that contributes equally to the left and right lites
The intermediate horizontals are considered the head and sill and contribute equally to the lites above and below
Calculating a Curtain Wall Elevation
The calculation is to determine the vision to wall ratio.First Step is to find the vision area: (((2(60”x36”))+(2(60”x84”))+(60”x45”)))/144 = 118.75 ft2
Second Step is to find total area: (62.5” x 297.5”)/144 = 129.12 ft2
Third Step is to find the Vision Area / Total Area (%):
(118.75 / 129.12) x 100 = 91.96%
1. Elevation is Shown
2. Curtain Wall
3. 1” Insulated Glass Unit (IGU), ½” Aluminum spacer, Air infill
4. COG U-factor = 0.29 COG SHGC = 0.38
5. AAMA 507 test report for Curtain Wall
Information Required:
the AAMA 507 Test Report
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
Required Information:
COG U-Factor = 0.29
Vision Area / Total Area (%) = 92%
Determining the U-factor by using
Use the Graph to find the U-Factor of the Curtain Wall System
Fourth Step
Curtain Wall System
0.42
0.29
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
Need the values:
U-Factor (COG) = 0.29
Vision Area / Total Area (%) = 92%
Using the Graph to find the U-Factor of the Curtain Wall System
We Get!
Assembly U-Factor = 0.42 Btu/hr.ft2.oF0.42
Fourth Step
0.29
the AAMA 507 Test ReportDetermining the U-factor by using
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
Curtain Wall System
Fifth (Last ) Step
Required Information:
SHGC (COG) = 0.38
Vision to Wall Ratio = 92%
Use the Graph to find the SHGC of the Curtain Wall System
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
the AAMA 507 Test ReportDetermining the SHGC by usingCurtain Wall System
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
0.360.38
Curtain Wall System
AAMA 507 Test Report: Using the Graphs
System SHGC =
0.36
0.360.38
Fifth (Last ) Step
Need the values:
SHGC (COG) = 0.38
Vision to Wall Ratio = 92%
Using the Graph to find the SHGC of the Curtain Wall System
We get!
the AAMA 507 Test ReportDetermining the SHGC by using
Curtain Wall System
U-Factor:(Btu/h•ft2•oF)
SHGC:
Certificate AuthorizationName: Company:
John Smith John Smith Glass Co., Inc.Signature: Date:
J ohn Smith
PROJECT INFORMATION:
Towson Towers Street Adress:
875 Dulaney Valley RoadCity: State: Zip:
Baltimore MDGLAZING CONTRACTOR / INSTALLER: Contact Person:
John Smith Glass Co., Inc. John SmithStreet Adress: Phone Number:
1010 E Joppa Rd (410) XXX-8800City: State: Zip:
Towson MD
GLAZING MATERIAL SUPPLIER: Contact Person:
Glass "R" Us Crystal GlassStreet Adress: Phone Number:
12 B Glass Fabricators Lane 1-800-XXX-4589City: State: Zip:
Crystal City VAGlass and Spacer Type:
1/4" Clear LowE x 1/2" Air space aluminum spacer x 1/4" ClearCenter-of-glass (C.O.G.) U-Factor: Center-of-glass (C.O.G.) SHGC:
0.29 Btu/h•ft2•oF 0.38
FRAMING MATERIAL SUPPLIER: Contact Person:
Street Adress: Phone Number:
City: State: Zip:
Product Line:
C.O.G. OVERALL C.O.G OVERALLU-Factor U-Factor SHGC SHGC
0.48 0.61 0.75 0.69
0.46 0.59 0.70 0.65 The overall ratings for U-factor and SHGC are based on a size of
0.44 0.58 0.65 0.60
0.42 0.56 0.60 0.56 2000 mm x 2000 mm (78 3/4 in x 78 3/4 in) as required in NFRC 100
0.40 0.55 0.55 0.51
0.38 0.53 0.50 0.47
0.36 0.51 0.45 0.42
0.34 0.50 0.40 0.38
0.32 0.48 0.35 0.33
0.30 0.46 0.30 0.29 ACCREDITED LABORATORY::
0.28 0.45 0.25 0.24
0.26 0.43 0.20 0.20
0.24 0.42 0.15 0.15 Reference Test Report #:
0.22 0.40 0.10 0.11
0.20 0.38 0.05 0.06
Overall U-factors and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients (SHGC) linisted in the matrix were determined in accordance with NFRC 100 and NFRC 200 respectively by a NFRC accredited laboratory.
1234.50 - 10
XYZ Labs
TA
BL
E 1
- G
LA
ZIN
GT
AB
LE
2 -
FR
AM
ING
22202
U-Factor Matrix (Btu/h•ft2•oF) SHGC Matrix
CERTIFICATE of COMPLIANCE
STOREFRONT
11/4/2010
21204
21204
CERTIFIES THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE WERE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT IDENTIFIED BELOW
0.42
0.35
OVERALL RATING
Directions: Fill out form completely. Determine the Overall Rating for this project by using the C.O.G. U-Factor and C.O.G. SHGC from Table 1 and looking up the overall rating from Table 2. Indicate the Overall Rating in the space above. Linear interpolation is permitted.
Review
“Certificate of Compliance”
Pre-qualify during submittals
Code Compliance
Consultative selling
AAMA 507 Test Reports
Find actual performance as designed:
For accurate energy models
Proper HVAC Sizing
Payback analysis
Product comparisons
Maximize FENESTRATION in Green Designs
Other12%
Computers2%
Appliances12%
Electronics7%
Water Heating10%
Ventilation3%
Lighting18%
Cooling13%
Heating23%
Potentially impacts 57% of the building’s
energy consumption to envelope relationship
Commercial fenestration products can have a big effect
Brick Street Mutual Insurance Co.,Charleston, West Virginia
Architect: Associated Architects, Inc.
Building Layout
EA Credit 1
Work toward achieving sustainable performance with aluminum commercial fenestration
What sustainable strategies are most effective when integrating aluminum commercial fenestration into the building design?
LEED 2009
Energy and Atmosphere
EA Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance (1-19 points) Building Layout Building Orientation Opening sizes Sun Control
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/alpha_list.cfm
Architect: Metro Architects
Energy Savings over a baseline building
Building Orientation can save 11.5%
Incorporating the proper Sunshades strategy can save 15%
Utilizing Light Shelves can save 25% (Based on 50% reduction in day time lighting)
Thermal Framing and LowE glass can save 13%
Integrating all these strategies could save 34% Plus
Based on an energy plus model study San Francisco, CA
EA Credit 1
NORTH
Materials and Resources
MR Credit 4 Recycled Content (1-2 points)
MR Credit 5 Regional Materials (Cannot qualify)
Achieve sustainable performance with aluminum commercial fenestration
Pre-Consumer
Post Consumer
Extracted, harvested or recovered
Recycled Content – Post Consumer
Aluminum Fenestration can contain Post Consumer recycled content, but due to quality issues with extrusions meeting tempering tolerances and finish post consumer
percentages are typically limited to 35%. Some manufacturers avoid post consumer recycled content because of these quality issues.
MR Credit 4
“Discarded materials fromone manufacturing processthat are used as constituentsin another manufacturingprocess are pre-consumerrecycled materials.”
AIA MASTERSPEC 2005
Recycled Content – Pre-Consumer (1/2)
Aluminum Fenestration can contain pre-consumer recycled content of 0% to 100% depending on the manufacturer and the requirements of the project
Recycled aluminum requires only 5 percent of the energy required to make "new" aluminum. Blending recycled metal with new metal allows considerable energy savings, as well as the efficient use of process heat. MR Credit 4
Regional Materials – Extracted
Aluminum is a by product of Bauxite mining and would not qualify due to the fact that there are no architectural grade aluminum Bauxite mines operating in the United States
Bauxite output in 2005 shown as a percentage of the top producer (Australia- 59,969,000 tonnes)
100 10 1 MR Credit 5
Indoor Environmental Quality
IEQ Credit 2 Increased Ventilation (1 point)
IEQ Credit 6.2 Controllability of Systems – Thermal Comfort (1 point)
IEQ Credit 8.1 Daylight and Views – Daylight (1 point) Schools (1-2 points)
IEQ Credit 8.2 Daylight and Views - Views
Work toward sustainable performance with aluminum commercial fenestration
Indoor Environmental Quality – Increased Ventilation
Operable Windows can be used if the naturally ventilated option is explored.
This strategy can sometimes be used meeting the IEQ Credit 6.2 credit as well to eliminate or reduces HVAC energy demands in some climates.
IEQ Credit 2
Indoor Environmental Quality – Controllability of Systems Thermal Comfort
20’ x 20’ = 400 sq. ft. x 4% = 16 sq. ft. of ventilation
ASHRAE standard 62.1-2007 paragraph 5.1 Natural Ventilation
IEQ Credit 6.2
Indoor Environmental Quality – Daylight and Views - Daylight
25 fc minimum
500 fc maximum
Measured on September 21 between 9 am and 3 pm
fc = foot-candle
IEQ Credit 8.1
Light Shelf
Duluth, MN
46.8° Latitude
3’ Sunshade
3’ Light Shelf 10’ Glazing
June 21 66.7o
Mar/Sep 21 43.2o
Dec 21 19.7o
South ElevationSun angles at Solar Noon
Calculating sun angles
IEQ Credit 8.1
Remember that light reflects at the same angle it is received
www.daylighting.org
Formulas and strategies
Daylighting Resources and Software Tools
http://btech.lbl.gov/tools
Software Tools and guides
http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/frameg.html
Radiance Simulation Software
IEQ Credit 8.1
DIALux Software
Can incorporate Sketch-Up models.
Daylighting Resources and Software Tools
Indoor Environmental Quality – Daylight and Views - Views
By using more interior glazed areas 90% of the regularly occupied spaces can maintain a direct line of sight to the out door spaces
IEQ Credit 8.2
Indoor Environmental Quality – Daylight and Views - Views
IEQ Credit 8.2
Indoor Environmental Quality
IEQ Credit 9 – Enhanced Acoustical Performance (1 Point)
For Schools only!
STC 35 Sound Transmission Class
Environmental Product Declarations
In the Life Cycle Analysis an EPD is a standardized way of quantifying the environmental impact of a product or system.
MARKET DEMAND for EPD’s is coming
Industry EPD Scope is Cradle to Gate (Gate is defined as installed)
LEED V4 – LCA … EPD … HPD
LEED V4 – LCA … EPD … HPD
Product Category
Rules
Life Cycle Analysis
Learning Objectives Understand recent changes to energy code
and the new green standards
Learn how to pre-qualify thermal performance for a project
Determine when to use performance results based on NFRC sizes and project specific sizes
Work toward sustainable performance with aluminum commercial fenestration
I hope you enjoyed this training session.
Questions?
David WardenCell: 678-822-4729
Email: davidwarden@ykkap.com
Local Representative: ???Cell: ???
Email: ???@ykkap.com
URL: www.ykkap.com
David WardenCell: 678-822-4729
Email: davidwarden@ykkap.com
Local Representative: ???Cell: ???
Email: ???@ykkap.com
URL: www.ykkap.com
top related