agenda town of fort mill historic review...
Post on 21-Mar-2020
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
AGENDA TOWN OF FORT MILL
HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD MEETING September 19, 2017 Council Chambers
4:30 PM Rescheduled from September 12, 2017 due
to Hurricane Irma.
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
HRB Meeting: August 8, 2017 [Page 2-3]
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness: [Pages 4-22]
Applicant/Owner Name: Springland, Inc Property Address: 312 N. White Street Purpose: Demolish existing building and construct new 17,100
square foot office building Zoning: Local Commercial
2. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness: [Pages 22-24]
Applicant/Owner Name: Town of Fort Mill Property Address: Main Street – 100 Block - South Side Purpose: Install Railing Zoning: Local Commercial
OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURN
1
MINUTES TOWN OF FORT MILL
HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD MEETING August 8, 2017
Spratt Building – 215 Main Street 4:30 PM
Present: Melissa White, Chairman Louis Roman, Carolyn Blair, Chip Heemsoth, Assistant Planner Diane Dil
Absent: Jonathan Mauney, Nik Radovanovic, Michael Hirsch
Guests: Jordyn Wisniewski (Kuester Development); Kim Allman (Clebourne Holdings, LLC)
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Roman called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Heemsoth made a motion to approve the minutes from the July 11, 2017, meeting as presented. Ms. Blair seconded the motion. The motion passed with a vote of 4-0.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Certification of Appropriateness – 133 Clebourne StreetChairman Roman introduced the item. Assistant Planner Dil stated that the applicant has requestedthat this item be deferred to the next meeting as they were unable to attend. Ms. Blair made amotion to defer the item to the September meeting. Mr. Heemsoth seconded the motion. Themotion was approved by a vote of 4-0.
2. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness – 111 Clebourne StreetNote: Since the applicant for item 2 had not arrived. Assistant Planner Dil requested that itemnumber four be discussed next.
Chairman Roman introduced the item. Assistant Planner provided an overview of the requestwhich was to install a new blade sign to the side of the building at 111 Clebourne Street. This newsign will be attached with a black powder coated aluminum bracket. The color of the sign will becream with black letters and made from high density urethane. The sign will be approximately 7square feet. The applicant will remove the existing pole sign as part of the process.
2
Chairman Roman asked about the materials and bracket. The applicant confirmed the materials as listed in the application. Hearing no further discussion, Chairman Roman requested a motion. Ms. Blair made a motion to approve the signs as submitted. Ms. White seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 4-0.
3. Request for Recertification for Baily Bill – 200 Main StreetAssistant Planner Dil stated that this is a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install adeck/patio to the rear of a commercial building. She stated that this item was briefly discussed atthe previous meeting however, since full renderings were not available the Board requested thisitem be brought back when they were complete. This is the final item to update the PreliminaryCertification for the Baily Bill to include all changes made since prior precertification.
Assistant Planner Dil provided an overview of the application which is to install a wood deck tothe rear of the commercial building. The deck will include handrails and post made of wood. Therailing will also include equally spaced stainless steel cables. Since the support posts will not bevisible no additional screening of the underside is required.
Hearing no further discussion, Chairman Roman requested a motion. Ms. Blair made a motion toapprove the item as presented. Mr. Heemsoth seconded the motion. The motion was approved bya vote of 4-0.
4. Request for Certification of Appropriateness – 200 Main StreetChairman Roman introduced the item. Assistant Planner Dil provided an overview of theapplication which is to install a chiller/cooler and wood shed in the rear of the commercialbuildings at 200 Main Street. The chiller/cooler will be screened by a wood enclosure painted tomatch the proposed deck. The wood shed, which will store wood for the barbeque restaurant willbe made of wood lap siding. It will also be screened from view.
A discussion ensued to confirm location, materials and screening of the proposed equipment.Hearing no further discussion, Chairman Roman requested a motion. Ms. Blair made a motion toapprove the Certificate of Appropriateness. Ms. White seconded the motion. The motion wasapproved by a vote of 4-0.
OTHER BUSINESS There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Diane Dil, AICP Assistant Planner
3
Applicant: Springland, Inc. 312 N. White Street Tax Map # 020-04-04-005;020-04-04-006 Zoning District: Local Commercial/Historic
Request
The Town has received a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existing building at 312 N. White Street and construct a new 17,100 square foot two-story building.
Site Description and General Construction Plan
The property is located at 312 N. White Street at the intersection of Skipper Street. The parcel is currently zoned Local Commercial (LC)/Historic. Parcels in the area are zoned R-15, Local Commercial, and General Industrial. Properties along this section of N. White Street include, the Founder’s Home, the old Springs Headquarters, Walter Elisha Park and Fort Mill Automotive. According to the York County Tax Assessor’s property card for 312 N. White Street the existing building was built in 1971. It is a non-contributing single story brick building, approximately 5,000 square feet. The project also includes an adjacent vacant parcel to be used for additional parking.
The new building will be two stories and approximately 17,100 square feet. It will be masonry with a blended grey color selection to include dove, slate and pewter grey. The building will have a distinct water table, as well as various brick details. Large vertical windows will be located throughout each elevation. A generally rectangular shape building and flat roof are both consistent with many commercial buildings in the historic district. Please see attached drawings for project details.
Historic District Design Guidelines Review
New construction in the Historic District should be compatible with the surrounding historic fabric but also express its true age. A key objective is to retain the overall character of the district while accommodating creative, yet compatible new buildings. New commercial buildings located outside of the immediate Main Street area should draw inspiration from those located within its general vicinity.
To achieve compatibility, a new building should:
Historic Review Board
4
• Relate to character-defining features of the context, including setback and open space patterns,mass and form, entries and porches, materials and other features
• Relate to features in the surrounding historic context and on adjacent properties, includingsetbacks, building heights, porch and window heights, the proportions of windows andarchitectural features, as well as roof forms.
• Express its true age, rather than directly imitating a historic style, or using faux historicinterpretation of the context.
• A new building may use a variety of designs to achieve compatibility. These may includesimplified interpretations of historic styles, or creative contemporary designs that incorporatecompatible features.
• Additional parking will be located behind the existing parking loto Guideline 6.7 – Minimize the visual impact of surface parking. Locate parking at the rear
or to the side whenever possible.o Guideline 6.19 – Provide a visual buffer along the edge of a parking lot and between
parking lots.
Staff Recommendation and Comments
According to the Zoning Ordinance, the HRB may delay the granting of the Certificate of Appropriateness for a period of up to 180 days after a finding by the HRB that the structure is of extreme historical importance to the people of Fort Mill. If the board finds that a building proposed for demolition is of no particular historical significance or value towards maintaining the historical character of Fort Mill, it may issue the Certificate in the normal manner. In the case of the building at 312 N. White Street, staff has determined there is no historical value and would recommend the approval to demolish without delay.
The site plan within the application does not provide much detail of parking area. Staff would recommend adding additional landscaping / buffer notes to the site plan. Also, many recent projects such as Veterans Park, Millstone Park and Hobos Restaurant have incorporated brick columns with caps into the landscape. Including something similar into this project would help visually connect this area of downtown Fort Mill with Main Street.
By adding additional details throughout the building elevations, the applicant has responded to comments from the HRB when a concept drawing was brought forward for review at the July HRB meeting. For the construction of the new building the applicant has met the requirements and intent of the Historic District Design Guidelines and staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness.
5
6
7
THE SPRINGS COMPANY
HEADQUARTERS
HISTORIC REVIEW
BOARD SUBMIT TAL
9.12.2017
8
2THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
ILLUSTRATIVE RENDERING
9
3THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
BUILDING AB
C
N
HWY. 160
SKIP
PER
ST.
8/28/2017 7:34:02 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
SITE PLAN
10
4THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
Pull a building apart, create
great in-between spaces.
A foot in the Past,
A foot in the Future.
CON
TEM
PORA
RY
comfortable comfortable
Recognizable organization
TOP
MIDDLE
BASE
1. !
2.
3.
BIG IDEAS
THE BIG IDEAS
11
5THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
HOW WILL THIS BE A GREAT BUILDING FOR FORT MILL?
1. A richness of TEXTURE, DETAIL, and SHADOWS
2. An appropriate SCALE and PROPORTION
3. Articulated BASE, MIDDLE, and TOP
4. Celebrated corners, sills, and headers
5. Interprets the immediate context as part of a CAMPUS
APPROPRIATENESS
12
6THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
NORTH ELEVATION (FACING PARKING LOT)
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUMWINDOW FRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT ANDFASCIA (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:19 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
13
7THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOW FRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:12 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
EAST ELEVATION (FACING SKIPPER STREET)
14
8THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOWFRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT ANDFASCIA (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:26 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
SOUTH ELEVATION (FACING HWY 160)
15
9THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
LEVEL 010' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01 DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOWFRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT ANDFASCIA (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZINGSTONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:34 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANYWEST ELEVATION (FACING FM AUTO)
16
10THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
BRK01 - BLENDED GREY BRICK 60% DOVE GREY20% SLATE GREY
20% PEWTER GREY
BRK02 - ALTERNATING REVEAL COURSING STACKED BOND OF
BLENDED GREY BRICK
BRK03 - SOLDIER COURSE MST01 - MAN-MADE STONE WATER TABLE
AL01 - DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME
AL02 - GUN METAL GREY ANODIZED ALUMINUM
FASCIA, SOFFIT AND STORE-FRONT
MATERIALS & DETAILS
17
11THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOW FRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:12 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
8/28/2017 9:51:10 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
BRK02 - ALTERNATING REVEAL COURSING STACKED BOND OF
BLENDED GREY BRICK
MATERIALS & DETAILS
BASEMST01 - MAN-MADE STONE
WATER TABLE
18
12THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
BRK01 - BLENDED GREY BRICK 60% DOVE GREY20% SLATE GREY
20% PEWTER GREY
BRK02 - ALTERNATING REVEAL COURSING STACKED BOND OF
BLENDED GREY BRICK
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOW FRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:12 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
MATERIALS & DETAILS
MIDDLELEVEL 01
0' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
8/28/2017 9:51:10 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY 19
13THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOWFRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT ANDFASCIA (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:26 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
AL01 - DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME
AL02 - GUN METAL GREY ANODIZED ALUMINUM
FASCIA, SOFFIT AND STORE-FRONT
MATERIALS & DETAILS
MIDDLELEVEL 01
0' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
8/28/2017 9:51:10 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY 20
14THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
GL01 - SOLARBAN 70XL NEUTRAL GREY LOW-E GLAZING
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOWFRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT ANDFASCIA (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:26 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
GL02 - CERAMIC FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
MATERIALS & DETAILS
MIDDLELEVEL 01
0' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
8/28/2017 9:51:25 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
21
15THE SPRINGS COMPANY HEADQUARTERS September 12, 2017
MATERIALS & DETAILS
TOP
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
SOLIDER COURSE - BRK03
ALTERNATING BRICKREVEAL COURSING -BRK02
BLENDED BRICK - BRK01
DK. BRONZE ALUM WINDOWFRAMING
ANODIZED ALUM. MULLIONS
ANODIZED ALUM. SOFFIT ANDFASCIA (TO MATCH MULLIONS)
FRIT PATTERN ON GLAZING
STONE WATER TABLE - MST01
8/28/2017 8:03:26 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
BRK03 - SOLDIER COURSE
LEVEL 010' - 0"
LEVEL 0214' - 0"
UPPER PARAPET32' - 0"
8/28/2017 9:51:25 AM
ARCHITECTURALThe Springs Company HeadquartersTHE SPRINGS COMPANY
22
Applicant: Town of Fort Mill 100 Block of Main Street Tax Map: N/A Zoning District: Local Commercial/Historic
Request
The Town has submitted a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a handrail at the sidewalk edge on the south side of the 100 block of Main Street between Confederate and Academy Streets.
Site Description and General Construction Plan
The area for the handrail installation will be along Main Street between Confederate and Academy Streets. The area is currently zoned Local Commercial (LC)/Historic. Uses in the area include small scale retail, professional services and office. The purpose of the handrail is to prevent someone from falling from the raised sidewalk onto passing cars below.
The applicant has submitted two different styles of railing/fencing. The first one which is black, either aluminum or wrought iron, with vertical rails similar to the fencing around nearby Hobos Restaurant.
Historic Review Board
23
While this may be more in keeping with the character of the of the historic district it may also block the view of the buildings. The second example would consist of either aluminum or wrought iron posts with horizontal metal cables. This would be a simpler, less obtrusive view but may not be consistent with the character. It should also be noted that similar railings are being used and have recently been approved for other parcels along Main Street.
Historic District Design Guidelines Review
• 6.6 – Design a new handrail and/or barrier to be simpleo Simple metal work is most appropriate. Low brick walls are also appropriate.o Do not obscure or damage historic character-defining features of a building with a barrier
or railing.
Staff Recommendation
Either design submitted would be meet the requirements and intent of the Historic District Design Guidelines.
24
top related