agenda
Post on 17-Jan-2016
26 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda
• Review of Faculty Tracks
• Mentoring Committees
• Third- and Sixth-Year Reviews
• Tenure Statistics Pre- and Post- “Artman”
AssistantProfessor
Instructor
AssistantProfessor(Research)
AssistantProfessor
AssistantProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssistantProfessor
ResearchAssistantProfessor
Investigator /Educator
Track
InvestigatorClinician /Educator
Track
ClinicianInvestigator /
EducatorTrack
ResearchTrack
Research /Educator
TrackClinicalTrack
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Research)
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssociateProfessor
ProfessorProfessor(Research) Professor
Professor(Clinical)
ClinicalProfessor
ResearchAssociateProfessor
ResearchProfessor
3 Years
10 Years
Full TimePart Time Part Time
Tenure Track
3 Years
Primary ThemesTenure Tracks
• Investigator / Educator Track, a full-time tenure track for those faculty members in any department whose primary career is in independent, investigator-initiated research and who devote some time to education and service.
• Investigator Clinician / Educator Track, a full-time tenure track…for those faculty in the clinical departments whose primary career combines independent research with clinical activities and who devote some time to education and service.
Promotion & TenurePromotion & Tenure
In addition to research and scholarly activities, all tenure track faculty members are required to participate in teaching.
Tenure track faculty members are also expected to contribute to the School of Medicine in a service capacity. They can fulfill this obligation by participating in committee work, internal governance and/or community service.
AssistantProfessor
Instructor
AssistantProfessor(Research)
AssistantProfessor
AssistantProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssistantProfessor
ResearchAssistantProfessor
Investigator /Educator
Track
InvestigatorClinician /Educator
Track
ClinicianInvestigator /
EducatorTrack
ResearchTrack
Research /Educator
TrackClinicalTrack
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Research)
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssociateProfessor
ProfessorProfessor(Research) Professor
Professor(Clinical)
ClinicalProfessor
ResearchAssociateProfessor
ResearchProfessor
3 Years
10 Years
Full TimePart Time Part Time
Tenure Track
3 Years
Primary ThemesPrimary ThemesFull-time, Non-tenureFull-time, Non-tenure
• Clinician Investigator / Educator Track, a full-time non-tenure track for those faculty members in clinical departments whose primary career is in the provision of clinical care and who devote a substantial portion of their efforts to teaching, research, and service.
• Research / Educator Track, a full-time non-tenure track for those faculty members in any department whose primary career is in research, but who devote a portion of their efforts to education and service.
PromotionPromotionFull-time, non-tenureFull-time, non-tenure
Promotion to the level of Associate Professor in must be considered within the first ten years as a member of the full-time faculty at New York University in the rank and/or ranks of Assistant Professor and Associate Professor. Promotion on either of these tracks will require documentation of: (1) excellence in teaching, research, and/or patient care; (2) evidence of peer recognition; and (3) contributions of service to the school.
AssistantProfessor
Instructor
AssistantProfessor(Research)
AssistantProfessor
AssistantProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssistantProfessor
ResearchAssistantProfessor
Investigator /Educator
Track
InvestigatorClinician /Educator
Track
ClinicianInvestigator /
EducatorTrack
ResearchTrack
Research /Educator
TrackClinicalTrack
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Research)
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssociateProfessor
ProfessorProfessor(Research) Professor
Professor(Clinical)
ClinicalProfessor
ResearchAssociateProfessor
ResearchProfessor
3 Years
10 Years
Full TimePart Time Part Time
Tenure Track
3 Years
Primary ThemesPart-Time Tracks
• Clinical Track, a part-time non-tenure track for those faculty members in clinical departments whose primary career is in the provision of clinical care and who devote some time to teaching, research and/or service.
• Research Track, a part-time non-tenure track for those faculty involved in part-time or time-limited research in other's laboratories and who devote limited time to teaching and service.
PromotionPromotionPart-time FacultyPart-time Faculty
Clinical Track Faculty members in this track will fulfill a variety of teaching, clinical and service responsibilities in the institution according to the needs of the departments and divisions…[and] will be expected to demonstrate excellence in patient care and teaching, and, when appropriate, to contribute to the service activities of the School of Medicine.
Research Track …In general, promotion for faculty members will be dependent upon the grants of others [and] will be expected to maintain a high level of proficiency and participation in the research program and, when appropriate, may contribute to the educational and service activities of the School of Medicine.
Mentoring Committees and Three and Six Year Reviews
Mentoring Committees
• All full-time Assistant Professors must have a mentoring committee.
• The goal of the committee is to provide the junior faculty member with a critical assessment of his/her progress.
• Two senior faculty, including one from the same department.
• Meet annually.• The committee must provide annual written reports to
the faculty member, the department Chair and (where appropriate) the Program Coordinator/Division Director.
LCME Self-Study Regarding Feedback
• A survey was sent to all junior faculty in April 2006.
• The response rate was 52%.
6376
59
79
41
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cent
of
resp
onde
nts
All Basic Clinical Ten Track Non-TenTrack
Awareness of Mentoring
63
46
29
83
0
20
40
60
80
100
Aw are Have Reports Requirement*
Mentoring Committees
*Believes that mentoring committees should be a requirement.
Third- and Sixth-Year Reviews
• Reviews are conducted for all full-time faculty• The Dean’s office notifies the Chair when a review is due• The review is conducted by the Chair and the
Departmental Appointments and Promotions Committee• If tenure is considered unlikely, the Chair meets with the
faculty member to discuss his/her options• The Chair notifies the Dean and faculty member of the
outcome of the meeting in writing
Notice of Non-reappointment of Non-tenured Tenure-Track Faculty
For appointments ending August 31:• First year of academic service……………Notice by March 1• Second year of academic service………..Notice by December 15• All others………………………………...….Notice by previous August 31
For appointments ending on a date other than August 31:• At least one year’s notice• Faculty can request an extension to the following August 31• Request must be in writing and at least 120 days before termination date
Information adapted from the NYU Faculty Handbook – Title II, Section XI, paragraph 2. (www.nyu.edu/oaa/faculty_hbk.html)
Non-reappointment ofNon-Tenure Track Faculty
• Appointment is for no more than one year• Appointment terminates automatically• No notice of non-reappointment is required• Three months’ notice is recommended as a
matter of good practice• Be attentive to issues of discrimination in
documenting reasons for non-reappointment• Discuss with Vice Dean for E/F/A for full-time
faculty
Tenure DecisionsTenure Decisions
• GrantsGrants • NIH Grants, including evidence of renewalNIH Grants, including evidence of renewal • Peer reviewed Peer reviewed publications (especially 1st or publications (especially 1st or
last-author publications)last-author publications)• Innovative technologiesInnovative technologies• Non-peer reviewed publicationsNon-peer reviewed publications• Book Book chapterschapters• AbstractsAbstracts• PresentationsPresentations
Summary of Pre-Artman v. Post-ArtmanApplicants for Tenure: 38% Increase
– Pre-Artman: 69 – Post-Artman: 95
Success Rate for All Applicants (Not Statistically Significant)– Pre-Artman: 65%– Post-Artman: 76%
Success Rate for Basic Scientists (Not Statistically Significant)– Pre-Artman: 79%– Post-Artman: 89%
Success Rate for Clinicians (Not Statistically Significant)– Pre-Artman: 62%– Post-Artman: 68%
Difference between basic and clinical success rates not statistically significant pre-Artman, but statistically significant post-Artman (P = 0.02).
Overall Effects of the Artman Report: Success Rates for Pre- and Post-Artman Tenure Applications
65
79
62
76
89
68
0
25
50
75
100
All Basic Clinical
Per
cen
t g
ran
ted
Pre-Artman
Post-Artman
Pre-Artman and Post-Artman Tenure Grantees (Basic Science Departments)
Pre Post
Category Mean SD Median Mean SD Median
# Grants 9.91 ± 7.54 8 7.88 ± 4.70 6
# NIH Grants 4.27 ± 2.87 4 3.88 ± 3.41 3
$ Amount of grants
3,198,638 ± 3,152,668 2,943,069
4,317,331 ± 3,434,494 3,791,750
# Peer reviewed publications 40.1 ± 14.4 40 47.6 ± 29.2 32.5
# 1st/last author publications 24.6 ± 8.71 25 27.2 ± 17.6 21
Pre-Artman and Post-Artman Grantees (Clinical Departments)
Pre Post
Category Mean SD Median Mean SD Median
# Grants* 6.03 ± 4.96 5.5 10.3 ± 9.51 7.5
# NIH Grants* 1.65 ± 2.24 0.5 3.78 ± 3.75 3.5
$ Amount of grants
3,331,543 ± 4,744,420 1,409,500
5,208,596 ± 6,087,578 3,709,375
# Peer reviewed publications* 35 7 ± 24.0 28 66.9 ± 53.1 44.5
# 1st/last author publications* 21.0 ± 20.2 15 36.1 ± 30.0 25
* Statistically significant difference between means for pre- v. post-Artman clinical grantees
Characteristics of Basic and Clinical Grantees, Pre-Artman
Basic Clinical
Category Mean SD Median Mean SD Median
# Grants 9.91 ± 7.54 8 6.03 ± 4.96 5.5
# NIH Grants* 4.27 ± 2.87 4 1.65 ± 2.24 0.5
$ Amount of grants
3,198,638 ± 3,152,668 2,943,069 3,331,543 ± 4,744,420
1,409,500
# Peer reviewed publications 40.1 ± 14.4 40 35 7 ± 24.0 28
# 1st/last author publications 24.6 ± 8.71 25 21.0 ± 20.2 15
* Statistically significant difference between means for basic v. clinical applicants
Characteristics of Basic and Clinical Grantees, Post-Artman
Basic Clinical
Category Mean SD Median Mean SD Median
# Grants 7.88 ± 4.70 6 10.3 ± 9.51 7.5
# NIH Grants 3.88 ± 3.41 3 3.78 ± 3.75 3.5
$ Amount of grants
4,317,331 ± 3,434,494 3,791,750
5,208,596 ± 6,087,578 3,709,375
# Peer reviewed publications 47.6 ± 29.2 32.5 66.9 ± 53.1 44.5
# 1st/last author publications 27.2 ± 17.6 21 36.1 ± 30.0 25
* Statistically significant difference between means for basic v. clinical applicants
Information
• http://www.med.nyu.edu/faa/resources/
• Steven.abramson@med.nyu.edu
• Janice.tobia@med.nyu.edu
Discussion
top related