adams tire models
Post on 01-Dec-2015
406 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Tire Models
Adams/Tire
12
Using the Fiala Handling Force ModelThis section of the help provides detailed technical reference material for defining tires on a mechanical
system model using Adams/Tire. It assumes that you know how to run Adams/Car, Adams/Solver, or
Adams/Chassis. It also assumes that you have a moderate level of tire-modeling proficiency.
The Fiala tire model is the standard tire model that comes with all Adams/Tire modules. This chapter
contains information for using the Fiala tire model:
• Assumptions
• Inputs
• Tire Slip Quantities and Transient Tire Behavior
• Force Evaluation
• Tire Carcass Shape
• Property File Format Example
• Contact Methods
Fiala Tire AssumptionsThe background of the Fiala tire model is a physical tire model, where the carcass is modeled as a beam
on an elastic foundation in the lateral direction. Elastic brush elements provide the contact between
carcass and road. Under these assumptions, analytical expressions for the steady-state slip characteristics
can be derived, which are the basis for the calculation of the longitudinal and lateral forces in Adams.
• Rectangular contact patch or footprint.
• Pressure distribution uniform across contact patch.
• No tire relaxation effects are considered.
• Camber angle has no effect on tire forces.
Fiala Tire InputsThe inputs to the Fiala tire model come from two sources:
• Input parameters from the tire property file (.tir), such as tire undeflected radius, that the tire
references.
• Tire kinematic states, such as slip angle ( ), which Adams/Tire calculates.
The following table summarizes the input that the Fiala tire model uses to calculate force.
α
13Tire Models
Input for Calculating Tire Forces
Quantity: Description: Use by Fiala: Source:
Mt Mass of tire • Damping
• Vertical force (Fz)
Alpha Slip angle Lateral force (Fy) Tire kinematic state from
Adams/Solver
Ss Longitudinal slip ratio Longitudinal force (Fx) Tire kinematic state from
Adams/Solver
pen Penetration (tire deflection) Vertical force (Fz) Tire kinematic state from
Adams/Solver
Vpen d/dt (penetration) Vertical force (Fz) Tire kinematic state from
Adams/Solver
Vertical_damping Vertical damping coefficient • Damping
• Vertical force (Fz)
Tire property file (.tir)
Vertical_stiffness Vertical tire stiffness Vertical force (Fz) Tire property file (.tir)
CSLIP Partial derivative of longitudinal
force (Fx) with respect to
longitudinal slip ratio (S) at zero
longitudinal slip
Longitudinal force (Fx) Tire property file (.tir)
CALPHA Partial derivative of lateral force
(Fy) with respect to slip angle
( ) at zero slip angle
Lateral force (Fy) Tire property file (.tir)
UMIN Coefficient of friction at zero
slip
Fx, Fy, Tz Tire property file (.tir)
UMAX Coefficient of friction when tire
is sliding
Fx, Fy, Tz Tire property file (.tir)
Rolling_resistance Rolling resistance coefficient Rolling resistance moment (Ty) Tire property file (.tir)
α
Adams/Tire
14
Tire Slip Quantities and Transient Tire Behavior
Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities at combined cornering and braking/traction
The longitudinal slip velocity Vsx in the SAE-axis system is defined using the longitudinal speed Vx, the
wheel rotational velocity , and the loaded rolling radius Rl:
The lateral slip velocity is equal to the lateral speed in the contact point with respect to the road
plane:
The practical slip quantities (longitudinal slip) and (slip angle) are calculated with these slip
velocities in the contact point:
and
Note that for realistic tire forces the slip angle is limited to 900 and the longitudinal slip in
between -1 (locked wheel) and 1.
Lagged longitudinal and lateral slip quantities (transient tire behavior)
In general, the tire rotational speed and lateral slip will change continuously because of the changing
interaction forces in between the tire and the road. Often the tire dynamic response will have an important
role on the overall vehicle response. For modeling this so-called transient tire behavior, a first-order
system is used both for the longitudinal slip ? as the side slip angle, ?. Considering the tire belt as a
stretched string, which is supported to the rim with lateral springs, the lateral deflection of the belt can
be estimated (see also reference [1]). The figure below shows a top-view of the string model.
Ω Vsx Vx ΩRl–=
Vsy Vy=
κ α
κVsx
Vx
--------–= αtanVsy
Vx
---------=
α κ
15Tire Models
Stretched String Model for Transient Tire behavior
When rolling, the first point having contact with the road adheres to the road (no sliding assumed).
Therefore, a lateral deflection of the string will arise that depends on the slip angle size and the history
of the lateral deflection of previous points having contact with the road.
For calculating the lateral deflection v1 of the string in the first point of contact with the road, the
following differential equation is valid during braking slip:
with the relaxation length in the lateral direction. The turnslip can be neglected at radii larger than
10 m. This differential equation cannot be used at zero speed, but when multiplying with Vx, the equation
can be transformed to:
When the tire is rolling, the lateral deflection depends on the lateral slip speed; at standstill, the deflection
depends on the relaxation length, which is a measure for the lateral stiffness of the tire. Therefore, with
this approach, the tire is responding to a slip speed when rolling and behaving like a spring at standstill.
A similar approach yields the following for the deflection of the string in longitudinal
direction:
1
Vx
------dv1
dt--------
v1
σ α------+ αtan aφ+=
σ α φ
σ α
dv1dt-------- Vx v1+ σ αVsy=
σ κ
du1dt-------- Vx u1+ σ– κVsx=
Adams/Tire
16
Now the practical slip quantities, and , are defined based on the tire
deformation:
These practical slip quantities and are used instead of the usual and definitions for steady-
state tire behavior.
The longitudinal and lateral relaxation length are read from the tire property file, see Fiala Tire Property
File Format Example
Fiala Tire Force EvaluationTypes of force evaluation:
• Normal Force of Road on Tire
• Longitudinal Force
• Lateral Force
• Rolling Resistance Moment
• Aligning Moment
• Smoothing
Normal Force of Road on Tire
The normal force of a road on a tire at the contact patch in the SAE coordinates (+Z downward) is always
negative (directed upward). The normal force is:
Fz = min (0.0, Fzk + Fzc)
where:
• Fzk is the normal force due to tire vertical stiffness
• Fzc is the normal force due to tire vertical damping
• Fzk = - vertical_stiffness × pen
• Fzc = - vertical_damping × Vpen
Instead of the linear vertical tire stiffness, also an arbitrary tire deflection - load curve can be defined in
the tire property file in the section [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] (see the Property File Format
Example). If a section called [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] exists, the load deflection datap oints
with a cubic spline for inter- and extrapolation are used for the calculation of the vertical force of the tire.
Note that you must specify VERTICAL_STIFFNESS in the tire property file, but it does not play any
role.
κ' α '
κ'u1σ κ------ Vx( )sgn=
α 'v1
σ α------
atan=
κ' α ' κ α
17Tire Models
Longitudinal Force
The longitudinal force depends on the vertical force (Fz), the current coefficient of friction (U), the
longitudinal slip ratio (Ss), and the slip angle (Alpha). The current coefficient of friction depends on the
static (UMAX) and dynamic (UMIN) friction coefficients and the comprehensive slip ratio (SsAlpha).
UMAX specifies the tire/road coefficient of friction at zero slip and represents the static friction
coefficient. This is the y-intercept on the friction coefficient versus slip graph. Note that this value is an
unobtainable maximum friction value, because there is always slip within a footprint. This value is used
in conjunction with UMIN to define a linear friction versus slip relation. UMAX will normally be larger
than UMIN.
UMIN specifies the tire/road coefficient of friction for the full slip case and represents the sliding friction
coefficient. This is the friction coefficient at 100% slip, or pure sliding. This value is used in conjunction
with UMAZ to define a linear friction versus slip relationship.
The comprehensive slip ( ):
The current value coefficient of friction (U):
Fiala defines a critical longitudinal slip ( ):
This is the value of longitudinal slip beyond which the tire is sliding.
Case 1. Elastic Deformation State: |Ss| S_critical
Fx = -CSLIP × Ss
Case 2. Complete Sliding State: |Ss| S_critical
Fx = -sign(Ss)(Fx1- Fx2)
where:
Ssα
Ssα Ss2
tan2 α( )+=
U Umax Umax Umin–( ) Ssα⋅( )–=
Scritical
ScriticalU Fz⋅
2 CSLIP⋅-------------------------=
<
>
Fx1 U Fz⋅=
Fx2U Fz⋅( )2
4 Ss CSLIP⋅ ⋅--------------------------------------=
Adams/Tire
18
Lateral Force
Like the longitudinal force, the lateral force depends on the vertical force (Fz) and the current coefficient
of friction (U). And similar to the longitudinal force calculation, Fiala defines a critical lateral slip
( ):
The lateral force peaks at a value equal to U × |Fz| when the slip angle (Alpha) equals the critical slip
angle ( ).
Case 1. Elastic Deformation State: |Alpha|
Fy = - U × |Fz|× (1-H3) × sign(Alpha)
where:
Case 2. Sliding State: |Alpha| Alpha_critical
Fy = -U|Fz|sign(Alpha)
Rolling Resistance Moment
When the tire is rolling forward: Ty = -rolling_resistance * Fz
When the tire is rolling backward: Ty = rolling_resistance * Fz
Aligning Moment
Case 1. Elastic Deformation State: |Alpha|
Mz = U × |Fz|× WIDTH × (1-H) × H3 × sign(Alpha)
where:
Case 2. Complete Sliding State: |Alpha|
Mz= 0.0
α critical
α critical
3 U Fz⋅ ⋅
CALPHA-------------------------
atan=
α critical
α critical≤
H 1CALPHA α( )tan⋅
3 U Fz⋅ ⋅--------------------------------------------------–=
α critical≤
H 1CALPHA α( )tan⋅
3 U Fz⋅ ⋅--------------------------------------------------–=
α critical>
19Tire Models
Smoothing
Adams/Tire can smooth initial transients in the tire force over the first 0.1 seconds of simulation. The
longitudinal force, lateral force, and aligning torque are multiplied by a cubic step function of time. (See
STEP in the Adams/Solver online help).
Longitudinal Force FLon = S*FLon
Lateral Force FLat = S*FLat
Aligning Torque Mz = S*Mz
The USE_MODE parameter in the tire property file allows you to switch smoothing on or off:
• USE_MODE = 1, smoothing is off
• USE_MODE = 2, smoothing is on
Fiala Tire Carcass ShapeUsing Fiala tire, you can optionally supply a tire carcass cross-sectional shape in the tire property file in
the [SHAPE] block. The 3D-durability, tire-to-road contact algorithm uses this information when
calculating the tire-to-road volume of interference. To learn more about this topic, see Applying the Tire
Carcass Shape. If you omit the [SHAPE] block from a tire property file, the tire carcass cross-section
defaults to the rectangle that the tire radius and width define.
You specify the tire carcass shape by entering points in fractions of the tire radius and width. Because
Adams/Tire assumes that the tire cross-section is symmetrical about the wheel plane, you only specify
points for half the width of the tire. The following apply:
• For width, a value of zero (0) lies in the wheel center plane.
• For width, a value of one (1) lies in the plane of the side wall.
• For radius, a value of one (1) lies on the tread.
For example, suppose your tire has a radius of 300 mm and a width of 185 mm and that the tread is joined
to the side wall with a fillet of 12.5 mm radius. The tread then begins to curve to meet the side wall at
+/- 80 mm from the wheel center plane. If you define the shape table using six points with four points
along the fillet, the resulting table might look like the shape block that is at the end of the following
property format example.
Fiala Tire Property File Format Example$------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER[MDI_HEADER]FILE_TYPE = 'tir'FILE_VERSION = 2.0FILE_FORMAT = 'ASCII'(COMMENTS)comment_string'Tire - XXXXXX''Pressure - XXXXXX'
Adams/Tire
20
'Test Date - XXXXXX''Test tire''New File Format v2.1'$----------------------------------------------------units[UNITS]LENGTH = 'mm'FORCE = 'newton'ANGLE = 'degree'MASS = 'kg'TIME = 'sec'$-----------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]! use mode 12 11 12 ! -------------------------------------------- ! smoothingX X! transient X X!PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT = 'FIALA'USE_MODE = 11.0$-------------------------------------------------dimension[DIMENSION]UNLOADED_RADIUS = 309.9WIDTH = 235.0ASPECT_RATIO = 0.45$-------------------------------------------------parameter[PARAMETER]VERTICAL_STIFFNESS = 310.0VERTICAL_DAMPING = 3.1ROLLING_RESISTANCE = 0.0CSLIP = 1000.0CALPHA = 800.0CGAMMA = 0.0UMIN = 0.9UMAX = 1.0RELAX_LENGTH_X = 0.05RELAX_LENGTH_Y = 0.15$---------------------------------------------carcass shape[SHAPE]radius width1.0000 0.00001.0000 0.50001.0000 0.86490.9944 0.92350.9792 0.98190.9583 1.0000$------------------------------------------------load_curve$ Maximum of 100 points (optional)[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen fz0 0.01 212.02 428.03 648.05 1100.0
21Tire Models
10 2300.020 5000.030 8100.0
Fiala Tire Contact MethodsThe Fiala tire model supports the following roads:
• 2D Roads, see Using the 2D Road Model.
• 3D Roads, see Adams/3D Road Model
Adams/Tire
22
Using the PAC2002Tire ModelThe PAC2002 Magic-Formula tire model has been developed by MSC.Software according to Tyre and
Vehicle Dynamics by Pacejka [1]. PAC2002 is latest version of a Magic-Formula model available in
Adams/Tire.
Learn about:
• When to Use PAC2002
• Modeling of Tire-Road Interaction Forces
• Axis Systems and Slip Definitions
• Contact Point and Normal Load Calculation
• Basics of Magic Formula
• Steady-State: Magic Formula
• Transient Behavior
• Gyroscopic Couple
• Left and Right Side Tires
• USE_MODES OF PAC2002: from Simple to Complex
• Quality Checks for Tire Model Parameters
• Contact Methods
• Standard Tire Interface (STI)
• Definitions
• References
• Example of PAC2002 Tire Property File
When to Use PAC2002Magic-Formula (MF) tire models are considered the state-of-the-art for modeling tire-road interaction
forces in vehicle dynamics applications. Since 1987, Pacejka and others have published several versions
of this type of tire model. The PAC2002 contains the latest developments that have been published in
Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics by Pacejka [1].
In general, a MF tire model describes the tire behavior for rather smooth roads (road obstacle
wavelengths longer than the tire radius) up to frequencies of 8 Hz. This makes the tire model applicable
for all generic vehicle handling and stability simulations, including:
• Steady-state cornering
• Single- or double-lane change
• Braking or power-off in a turn
• Split-mu braking tests
• J-turn or other turning maneuvers
• ABS braking, when stopping distance is important (not for tuning ABS control strategies)
23Tire Models
• Other common vehicle dynamics maneuvers on rather smooth roads (wavelength of road
obstacles must be longer than the tire radius)
For modeling roll-over of a vehicle, you must pay special attention to the overturning moment
characteristics of the tire (Mx) and the loaded radius modeling. The last item may not be sufficiently
accurate in this model.
The PAC2002 model has proven to be applicable for car, truck, and aircraft tires with camber
(inclination) angles to the road not exceeding 15 degrees.
PAC2002 and Previous Magic Formula Models
Compared to previous versions, PAC2002 is backward compatible with all previous versions of
PAC2002, MF-Tyre 5.x tire models, and related tire property files.
New Features
The enhancements for PAC2002 in Adams/Tire 2005 r2 are:
• More advanced tire-transient modeling using a contact mass in the contact point with the road.
This results in more realistic dynamic tire model response at large slip, low speed, and standstill
(usemode > 20).
• Parking torque and turn-slip have been introduced: the torque around the vertical axis due to
turning at standstill or at low speed (no need for extra parameters).
• Extended loaded radius modeling (see Contact Point and Normal Load Calculation) are suitable
for driving under extreme conditions like roll-over events and racing applications.
• The option to use a nonlinear spline for the vertical tire load-deflection instead of a linear tire
stiffness. See Contact Point and Normal Load Calculation.
• Modeling of bottoming of the tire to the road by using another spline for defining the bottoming
forces. Learn more about wheel bottoming.
• Online scaling of the tire properties during a simulation; the scaling factors of the PAC2002 can
now be changed as a function of time, position, or any other variable in your model dataset. See
Online Scaling of Tire Properties.
Modeling of Tire-Road Interaction ForcesFor vehicle dynamics applications, an accurate knowledge of tire-road interaction forces is inevitable
because the movements of a vehicle primarily depend on the road forces on the tires. These interaction
forces depend on both road and tire properties, and the motion of the tire with respect to the road.
In the radial direction, the MF tire models consider the tire to behave as a parallel linear spring and linear
damper with one point of contact with the road surface. The contact point is determined by considering
the tire and wheel as a rigid disc. In the contact point between the tire and the road, the contact forces in
longitudinal and lateral direction strongly depend on the slip between the tire patch elements and the
road.
Adams/Tire
24
The figure, Input and Output Variables of the Magic Formula Tire Model, presents the input and output
vectors of the PAC2002 tire model. The tire model subroutine is linked to the Adams/Solver through the
Standard Tire Interface (STI) [3]. The input through the STI consists of:
• Position and velocities of the wheel center
• Orientation of the wheel
• Tire model (MF) parameters
• Road parameters
The tire model routine calculates the vertical load and slip quantities based on the position and speed of
the wheel with respect to the road. The input for the Magic Formula consists of the wheel load (Fz), the
longitudinal and lateral slip ( , ), and inclination angle ( ) with the road. The output is the forces (Fx,
Fy) and moments (Mx, My, Mz) in the contact point between the tire and the road. For calculating these
forces, the MF equations use a set of MF parameters, which are derived from tire testing data.
The forces and moments out of the Magic Formula are transferred to the wheel center and returned to
Adams/Solver through STI.
Input and Output Variables of the Magic Formula Tire Model
Axis Systems and Slip Definitions• Axis Systems
• Units
• Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
κ α γ
25Tire Models
Axis Systems
The PAC2002 model is linked to Adams/Solver using the TYDEX STI conventions, as described in the
TYDEX-Format [2] and the STI [3].
The STI interface between the PAC2002 model and Adams/Solver mainly passes information to the tire
model in the C-axis coordinate system. In the tire model itself, a conversion is made to the W-axis system
because all the modeling of the tire behavior as described in this help assumes to deal with the slip
quantities, orientation, forces, and moments in the contact point with the TYDEX W-axis system. Both
axis systems have the ISO orientation but have different origin as can be seen in the figure below.
TYDEX C- and W-Axis Systems Used in PAC2002, Source [2]
The C-axis system is fixed to the wheel carrier with the longitudinal xc-axis parallel to the road and in
the wheel plane (xc-zc-plane). The origin of the C-axis system is the wheel center.
The origin of the W-axis system is the road contact-point defined by the intersection of the wheel plane,
the plane through the wheel carrier, and the road tangent plane.
The forces and moments calculated by PAC2002 using the MF equations in this guide are in the W-axis
system. A transformation is made in the source code to return the forces and moments through the STI
to Adams/Solver.
The inclination angle is defined as the angle between the wheel plane and the normal to the road tangent
plane (xw-yw-plane).
Units
The units of information transferred through the STI between Adams/Solver and PAC2002 are according
to the SI unit system. Also, the equations for PAC2002 described in this guide have been developed for
use with SI units, although you can easily switch to another unit system in your tire property file. Because
of the non-dimensional parameters, only a few parameters have to be changed.
Adams/Tire
26
However, the parameters in the tire property file must always be valid for the TYDEX W-axis system
(ISO oriented). The basic SI units are listed in the table below.
SI Units Used in PAC2002
Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
The longitudinal slip velocity Vsx in the contact point (W-axis system, see Slip Quantities at Combined
Cornering and Braking/Traction) is defined using the longitudinal speed Vx, the wheel rotational velocity
, and the effective rolling radius Re:
(1)
Slip Quantities at Combined Cornering and Braking/Traction
Variable type: Name: Abbreviation: Unit:
Angle Slip angle
Inclination angle
Radians
Force Longitudinal force
Lateral force
Vertical load
Fx
Fy
Fz
Newton
Moment Overturning moment
Rolling resistance moment
Self-aligning moment
Mx
My
Mz
Newton.meter
Speed Longitudinal speed
Lateral speed
Longitudinal slip speed
Lateral slip speed
Vx
Vy
Vsx
Vsy
Meters per second
Rotational speed Tire rolling speed Radians per second
α
γ
ω
ω
Vsx Vx ΩRe–=
27Tire Models
The lateral slip velocity is equal to the lateral speed in the contact point with respect to the road plane:
(2)
The practical slip quantities (longitudinal slip) and (slip angle) are calculated with these slip
velocities in the contact point with:
(3)
(4)
The rolling speed Vr is determined using the effective rolling radius Re:
(5)
Turn-slip is one of the two components that form the spin of the tire. Turn-slip is calculated using the
tire yaw velocity :
(6)
The total tire spin is calculated using:
(7)
The total tire spin has contributions of turn-slip and camber. denotes the camber reduction factor for
the camber to become comparable with turn-slip.
Vsy Vy=
κ α
κVsx
Vx
--------–=
αtanVsy
Vx
---------=
Vr ReΩ=
φ
ψ·
Wtψ·
Vx
------=
ϕ
ψ 11
Vx
------ ψ· 1 εγ–( )Ω γsin– =
ε
Adams/Tire
28
Contact Point and Normal Load Calculation• Contact Point
• Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius
• Wheel Bottoming
Contact Point
In the vertical direction, the tire is modeled as a parallel linear spring and damper having one point of
contact (C) with the road. This is valid for road obstacles with a wavelength larger than the tire radius
(for example, for car tires 1m).
For calculating the kinematics of the tire relative to the road, the road is approximated by its tangent plane
at the road point right below the wheel center (see the figure below).
Contact Point C: Intersection between Road Tangent Plane, Spin Axis Plane, and Wheel Plane
The contact point is determined by the line of intersection of the wheel center-plane with the road tangent
(ground) plane and the line of intersection of the wheel center-plane with the plane through the wheel
spin axis. The normal load Fz of the tire is calculated with the tire deflection as follows:ρ
29Tire Models
(8)
Using this formula, the vertical tire stiffness increases due to increasing rotational speed and
decreases by longitudinal and lateral tire forces. If qFz1 is zero, qFz1 will be CzR0/Fz0.
When you do not provide the coefficients qV2, qFcx, qFcy, qFz1, qFz2 and qFc in the tire property
file, the normal load calculation is compatible with previous versions of PAC2002, because, in that case,
the normal load is calculated using the linear vertical tire stiffness Cz and tire damping Kz according to:
(9)
Instead of the linear vertical tire stiffness Cz (= qFz1Fz0/R0), you can define an arbitrary tire deflection
- load curve in the tire property file in the section [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] (see the Example
of PAC2002 Tire Property File). If a section called [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] exists, the load
deflection data points with a cubic spline for inter- and extrapolation are used for the calculation of the
vertical force of the tire. Note that you must specify Cz in the tire property file, but it does not play any
role.
Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius
With the loaded tire radius Rl defined as the distance of the wheel center to the contact point of the tire
with the road, the tire deflection can be calculated using the free tire radius R0 and a correction for the
tire radius growth due to the rotational tire speed :
(10)
The effective rolling radius Re (at free rolling of the tire), which is used to calculate the rotational speed
of the tire, is defined by:
(11)
For radial tires, the effective rolling radius is rather independent of load in its load range of operation
because of the high stiffness of the tire belt circumference. Only at low loads does the effective tire radius
decrease with increasing vertical load due to the tire tread thickness. See the figure below.
Fz 1 qV2 ΩRo
Vo
------ qFcxlFxFz0--------
2
– qFcylFyFz0--------
2
– qFcylγ2
+ +
qFzlρR0
------ qFz2ρR0
------ 2+ Fz0 Kz ρ·•+
=
ω
γ
Fz Czρ λ Cz Kzρ·
+=
ω
ρ R0 R1– qV1R0 ΩR0
V0
------
2
+=
Re
Vx
Ω------=
Adams/Tire
30
Effective Rolling Radius and Longitudinal Slip
To represent the effective rolling radius Re, a MF-type of equation is used:
(12)
in which Fz0 is the nominal tire deflection:
Rf R0 qV1R0
ΩR0
V0
-----------
2
RFz0 DPeffarc BReffρd
( ) FReffρd
+tan[ ]–+=
ρ
31Tire Models
(13)
and is called the dimensionless radial tire deflection, defined by:
(14)
Example of Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius as Function of Vertical Load
Normal Load and Rolling Radius Parameters
Name:Name Used in Tire Property
File: Explanation:
Fz0 FNOMIN Nominal wheel load
Ro UNLOADED_RADIUS Free tire radius
B BREFF Low load stiffness effective rolling radius
D DREFF Peak value of effective rolling radius
F FREFF High load stiffness effective rolling radius
Cz VERTICAL_STIFFNESS Tire vertical stiffness (if qFz1=0)
ρ Fz0Fz0
Czλ Cz----------------=
ρ
ρd ρ
ρ Fz0---------=
Adams/Tire
32
Wheel Bottoming
You can optionally supply a wheel-bottoming deflection, that is, a load curve in the tire property file in
the [BOTTOMING_CURVE] block. If the deflection of the wheel is so large that the rim will be hit
(defined by the BOTTOMING_RADIUS parameter in the [DIMENSION] section of the tire property
file), the tire vertical load will be increased according to the load curve defined in this section.
Note that the rim-to-road contact algorithm is a simple penetration method (such as the 2D contact) based
on the tire-to-road contact calculation, which is strictly valid for only rather smooth road surfaces (the
length of obstacles should have a wavelength longer than the tire circumference). The rim-to-road contact
algorithm is not based on the 3D-volume penetration method, but can be used in combination with the
3D Contact, which takes into account the volume penetration of the tire itself. If you omit the
[BOTTOMING_CURVE] block from a tire property file, no force due to rim road contact is added to the
tire vertical force.
You can choose a BOTTOMING_RADIUS larger than the rim radius to account for the tire's material
remaining in between the rim and the road, while you can adjust the bottoming load-deflection curve for
the change in stiffness.
Kz VERTICAL_DAMPING Tire vertical damping
qFz1 QFZ1 Tire vertical stiffness coefficient (linear)
qFz2 QFZ2 Tire vertical stiffness coefficient
(quadratic)
qFcx1 QFCX1 Tire stiffness interaction with Fx
qFcy1 QFCY1 Tire stiffness interaction with Fy
qFc 1 QFCG1 Tire stiffness interaction with camber
qV1 QV1 Tire radius growth coefficient
qV2 QV2 Tire stiffness variation coefficient with
speed
Name:Name Used in Tire Property
File: Explanation:
γ
33Tire Models
If (Pentire - (Rtire - Rbottom) - ½·width ·| tan(g) |) < 0, the left or right side of the rim has contact with
the road. Then, the rim deflection Penrim can be calculated using:
= max(0 , ½·width ·| tan( ) | ) + Pentire- (Rtire - Rbottom)
Penrim= 2/(2 · width ·| tan( ) |)
δ γ
δ γ
Adams/Tire
34
Srim= ½·width - max(width , /| tan( ) |)/3
with Srim, the lateral offset of the force with respect to the wheel plane.
If the full rim has contact with the road, the rim deflection is:
Penrim = Pentire - (Rtire - Rbottom)
Srim = width2 · | tan( ) | · /(12 · Penrim)
Using the load - deflection curve defined in the [BOTTOMING_CURVE] section of the tire property file,
the additional vertical force due to the bottoming is calculated, while Srim multiplied by the sign of the
inclination is used to calculate the contribution of the bottoming force to the overturning moment.
Further, the increase of the total wheel load Fz due to the bottoming (Fzrim) will not be taken into account
in the calculation for Fx, Fy, My, and Mz. Fzrim will only contribute to the overturning moment Mx using
the Fzrim·Srim.
Basics of the Magic Formula in PAC2002The Magic Formula is a mathematical formula that is capable of describing the basic tire characteristics
for the interaction forces between the tire and the road under several steady-state operating conditions.
We distinguish:
• Pure cornering slip conditions: cornering with a free rolling tire
• Pure longitudinal slip conditions: braking or driving the tire without cornering
• Combined slip conditions: cornering and longitudinal slip simultaneously
For pure slip conditions, the lateral force Fy as a function of the lateral slip , respectively, and the
longitudinal force Fx as a function of longitudinal slip , have a similar shape (see the figure,
Characteristic Curves for Fx and Fy Under Pure Slip Conditions). Because of the sine - arctangent
combination, the basic Magic Formula equation is capable of describing this shape:
(15)
where Y(x) is either Fx with x the longitudinal slip , or Fy and x the lateral slip .
δ γ
γ
γ
Note: Rtire is equal to the unloaded tire radius R0; Pentire is similar to effpen (= ).ρ
α
κ
Y x( ) D Carc Bx E Bx arc Bx( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos=
κ α
35Tire Models
Characteristic Curves for Fx and Fy Under Pure Slip Conditions
The self-aligning moment Mz is calculated as a product of the lateral force Fy and the pneumatic trail t
added with the residual moment Mzr. In fact, the aligning moment is due to the offset of lateral force Fy,
called pneumatic trail t, from the contact point. Because the pneumatic trail t as a function of the lateral
slip a has a cosine shape, a cosine version the Magic Formula is used:
(16)
in which Y(x) is the pneumatic trail t as function of slip angle .
The figure, The Magic Formula and the Meaning of Its Parameters, illustrates the functionality of the B,
C, D, and E factor in the Magic Formula:
• D-factor determines the peak of the characteristic, and is called the peak factor.
• C-factor determines the part used of the sine and, therefore, mainly influences the shape of the
curve (shape factor).
• B-factor stretches the curve and is called the stiffness factor.
• E-factor can modify the characteristic around the peak of the curve (curvature factor).
Y x( ) D Carc Bx E Bx arc Bx( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos=
α
Adams/Tire
36
The Magic Formula and the Meaning of Its Parameters
In combined slip conditions, the lateral force Fy will decrease due to longitudinal slip or the opposite, the
longitudinal force Fx will decrease due to lateral slip. The forces and moments in combined slip
conditions are based on the pure slip characteristics multiplied by the so-called weighing functions.
Again, these weighting functions have a cosine-shaped MF equation.
The Magic Formula itself only describes steady-state tire behavior. For transient tire behavior (up to 8
Hz), the MF output is used in a stretched string model that considers tire belt deflections instead of slip
velocities to cope with standstill situations (zero speed).
37Tire Models
Input Variables
The input variables to the Magic Formula are:
Output Variables
The output variables are defined in the W-axis system of TYDEX.
Basic Tire Parameters
All tire model parameters of the model are without dimension. The reference parameters for the model
are:
As a measure for the vertical load, the normalized vertical load increment dfz is used:
(17)
with the possibly adapted nominal load (using the user-scaling factor, ):
(18)
Longitudinal slip [-]
Slip angle [rad]
Inclination angle [rad]
Normal wheel load Fz [N]
Longitudinal force Fx [N]
Lateral force Fy [N]
Overturning couple Mx [Nm]
Rolling resistance
moment
My [Nm]
Aligning moment Mz [Nm]
Nominal (rated) load Fz0 [N]
Unloaded tire radius R0 [m]
Tire belt mass mbelt [kg]
κ
α
γ
fzdFz F'z0–
F'z0--------------------=
γΦ z0
F'z0 Fz0 λ Fz0•=
Adams/Tire
38
Nomenclature of the Tire Model Parameters
In the subsequent sections, formulas are given with non-dimensional parameters aijk with the following
logic:
Tire Model Parameters
User Scaling Factors
A set of scaling factors is available to easily examine the influence of changing tire properties without
the need to change one of the real Magic Formula coefficients. The default value of these factors is 1.
You can change the factors in the tire property file. The peak friction scaling factors, l and ,
are also used for the position-dependent friction in 3D Road Contact and 3D Road. An overview of all
scaling factors is shown in the following tables.
Parameter: Definition:
a = p Force at pure slip
q Moment at pure slip
r Force at combined slip
s Moment at combined slip
i = B Stiffness factor
C Shape factor
D Peak value
E Curvature factor
K Slip stiffness = BCD
H Horizontal shift
V Vertical shift
s Moment at combined slip
t Transient tire behavior
j = x Along the longitudinal axis
y Along the lateral axis
z About the vertical axis
k = 1, 2, ...
µξ γµψ ψ
39Tire Models
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Pure Slip
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
Fzo LFZO Scale factor of nominal (rated) load
Cz LCZ Scale factor of vertical tire stiffness
Cx LCX Scale factor of Fx shape factor
x LMUX Scale factor of Fx peak friction coefficient
Ex LEX Scale factor of Fx curvature factor
Kx LKX Scale factor of Fx slip stiffness
Hx LHX Scale factor of Fx horizontal shift
Vx LVX Scale factor of Fx vertical shift
x LGAX Scale factor of inclination for Fx
Cy LCY Scale factor of Fy shape factor
y LMUY Scale factor of Fy peak friction coefficient
Ey LEY Scale factor of Fy curvature factor
Ky LKY Scale factor of Fy cornering stiffness
Hy LHY Scale factor of Fy horizontal shift
Vy LVY Scale factor of Fy vertical shift
gy LGAY Scale factor of inclination for Fy
t LTR Scale factor of peak of pneumatic trail
Mr LRES Scale factor for offset of residual moment
LGAZ Scale factor of inclination for Mz
Mx LMX Scale factor of overturning couple
VMxMx LVMX Scale factor of Mx vertical shift
My LMY Scale factor of rolling resistance moment
λ
λ
λ
λ µ
λ
λ
λ
λ
λ γ
λ
λ µ
λ
λ
λ
λ
λ
λ
λ
λ γzγz
λ
λ
λ
Adams/Tire
40
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Combined Slip
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Transient Response
Note that the scaling factors change during the simulation according to any user-introduced function. See
the next section, Online Scaling of Tire Properties.
Online Scaling of Tire Properties
PAC2002 can provide online scaling of tire properties. For each scaling factor, a variable should be
introduced in the Adams .adm dataset. For example:
!lfz0 scaling! adams_view_name='TR_Front_Tires until wheel_lfz0_var'VARIABLE/53, IC = 1, FUNCTION = 1.0
This lets you change the scaling factor during a simulation as a function of time or any other variable in
your model. Therefore, tire properties can change because of inflation pressure, road friction, road
temperature, and so on.
You can also use the scaling factors in co-simulations in MATLAB/Simulink.
For more detailed information, see Knowledge Base Article 12732.
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
LXAL Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
LYKA Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
LVYKA Scale factor of kappa-induced Fy
LS Scale factor of moment arm of Fx
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
sk LSGKP Scale factor of relaxation length of Fx
sa LSGAL Scale factor of relaxation length of Fy
gyr LGYR Scale factor of gyroscopic moment
λ xαα
λ yκκ
λ Vyκκ
λ s
λ
λ
λ
41Tire Models
Steady-State: Magic Formula in PAC2002• Steady-State Pure Slip
• Steady-State Combined Slip
Steady-State Pure Slip
• Longitudinal Force at Pure Slip
• Lateral Force at Pure Slip
• Aligning Moment at Pure Slip
• Turn-slip and Parking
Formulas for the Longitudinal Force at Pure Slip
For the tire rolling on a straight line with no slip angle, the formulas are:
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
with following coefficients:
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
the longitudinal slip stiffness:
(27)
(28)
Fx Fx0 κ Fz γ, ,( )=
Fx0 Dx Cxarc Bxκx Ex Bxκx arc Bxκx( )tan–( )– tan[ ] SVx+( )sin=
κx κ SHx+=
γx γ λ γx⋅=
Cx pCx1 λ Cx⋅=
Dx µx Fz ζ1⋅ ⋅=
µx pDx1 pDx2 fzd+( ) 1 pDx3 γ2
⋅–( )λ µx⋅=
Ex pEx1 pEx2 fz2
d+( ) 1 pEx4 κx( )sgn– λ Ex with Ex 1≤⋅ ⋅=
Kx Fz pKx1 pKx2 fzd+( ) pKx3 fzd( ) λ Kx⋅exp⋅ ⋅=
Kx BxCxDx κx∂
∂ Fx0at κ 0= = =
Bx Kx CxDx( )⁄=
Adams/Tire
42
(29)
(30)
Longitudinal Force Coefficients at Pure Slip
Formulas for the Lateral Force at Pure Slip
(31)
(32)
(33)
The scaled inclination angle:
(34)
with coefficients:
(35)
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pCx1 PCX1 Shape factor Cfx for longitudinal force
pDx1 PDX1 Longitudinal friction Mux at Fznom
pDx2 PDX2 Variation of friction Mux with load
pDx3 PDX3 Variation of friction Mux with inclination
pEx1 PEX1 Longitudinal curvature Efx at Fznom
pEx2 PEX2 Variation of curvature Efx with load
pEx3 PEX3 Variation of curvature Efx with load squared
pEx4 PEX4 Factor in curvature Efx while driving
pKx1 PKX1 Longitudinal slip stiffness Kfx/Fz at Fznom
pKx2 PKX2 Variation of slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
pKx3 PKX3 Exponent in slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
pHx1 PHX1 Horizontal shift Shx at Fznom
pHx2 PHX2 Variation of shift Shx with load
pVx1 PVX1 Vertical shift Svx/Fz at Fznom
pVx2 PVX2 Variation of shift Svx/Fz with load
SHx pHx1 pHx2 dfz⋅+( )λ Hx=
SVx Fz pHx1 pHx2 dfz⋅+( )λ Vx λ Hµx ζ1⋅ ⋅⋅=
Fy Fy0 α γ Fz, ,( )=
Fy0 Dy Cyarc Byα y Ey Byαy arc Byα y( )tan–( )– tan[ ] SVy+sin=
α y α SHy+=
γy γ λ γy⋅=
Cy pCy1 λ Cy⋅=
43Tire Models
(36)
(37)
(38)
The cornering stiffness:
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
The camber stiffness is given by:
(44)
Lateral Force Coefficients at Pure Slip
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pCy1 PCY1 Shape factor Cfy for lateral forces
pDy1 PDY1 Lateral friction Muy
pDy2 PDY2 Variation of friction Muy with load
pDy3 PDY3 Variation of friction Muy with squared inclination
pEy1 PEY1 Lateral curvature Efy at Fznom
pEy2 PEY2 Variation of curvature Efy with load
pEy3 PEY3 Inclination dependency of curvature Efy
pEy4 PEY4 Variation of curvature Efy with inclination
pKy1 PKY1 Maximum value of stiffness Kfy/Fznom
pKy2 PKY2 Load at which Kfy reaches maximum value
pKy3 PKY3 Variation of Kfy/Fznom with inclination
pHy1 PHY1 Horizontal shift Shy at Fznom
Dy µy Fz ζ2⋅ ⋅=
µy pDy1 pDy2dfz+( ) 1 pDy3γy2
–( ) λ µy⋅ ⋅=
Ey pEy1 pEy2dfz+( ) 1 pEy3 pEy4γy+( ) α y( )sgn– γEy with Ey 1≤⋅ ⋅=
Ky0 PKy1 Fz0 2acFz
PKy2F0λ Fz0---------------------------
tan λ Fz0 λ Ky⋅ ⋅
sin⋅ ⋅=
Ky Ky0 1 pKy3 γy–( ) ζ3⋅ ⋅=
By Ky CyDy( )⁄=
SHy pHy1 pHy2dfz+( ) λ Hy pHy3γy ζ0 ζ4 1–+⋅+⋅=
SVy Fz pVy1 pVy2dfz+( ) λ Vy pVy3 pVy4dfz+( ) γy⋅+⋅ λ µy ζ4⋅ ⋅ ⋅=
Kyγ0 PHy3Ky0 Fz pνy3 pνy4dfz+( )+=
Adams/Tire
44
Formulas for the Aligning Moment at Pure Slip
(45)
with the pneumatic trail t:
(46)
(47)
and the residual moment Mzr:
(48)
(49)
(50)
The scaled inclination angle:
(51)
with coefficients:
(52)
(53)
(54)
pHy2 PHY2 Variation of shift Shy with load
pHy3 PHY3 Variation of shift Shy with inclination
pVy1 PVY1 Vertical shift in Svy/Fz at Fznom
pVy2 PVY2 Variation of shift Svy/Fz with load
pVy3 PVY3 Variation of shift Svy/Fz with inclination
pVy4 PVY4 Variation of shift Svy/Fz with inclination and load
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
M'z Mz0 α γ Fz, ,( )=
Mz0 t Fy0 Mzr+⋅–=
t α t( ) Dt Ctarc Btα t Et Btα t arc Btα t( )tan–( )– tan[ ] α( )coscos=
α t α SHt+=
Mzr α r( ) Dr Crarc Brα r( )tan[ ] α( )cos⋅cos=
α r α SHf+=
SHf SHy SVy Ky⁄+=
γz γ λ γz⋅=
Bt qBz1 qBz2dfz qBz3dfz2
+ +( ) 1 qBz4γz qBz5 γz+ +( ) λ Ky λ µy⁄⋅ ⋅=
Ct qCz1=
Dt Fz qDz1 qDz2dfz+( ) 1 qDz3γz qDz4γz2
+ +( )R0
Fz0-------- λ t ζ5⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅=
45Tire Models
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
An approximation for the aligning moment stiffness reads:
(59)
Aligning Moment Coefficients at Pure Slip
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qBz1 QBZ1 Trail slope factor for trail Bpt at Fznom
qBz2 QBZ2 Variation of slope Bpt with load
qBz3 QBZ3 Variation of slope Bpt with load squared
qBz4 QBZ4 Variation of slope Bpt with inclination
qBz5 QBZ5 Variation of slope Bpt with absolute inclination
qBz9 QBZ9 Slope factor Br of residual moment Mzr
qBz10 QBZ10 Slope factor Br of residual moment Mzr
qCz1 QCZ1 Shape factor Cpt for pneumatic trail
qDz1 QDZ1 Peak trail Dpt = Dpt*(Fz/Fznom*R0)
qDz2 QDZ2 Variation of peak Dpt with load
qDz3 QDZ3 Variation of peak Dpt with inclination
qDz4 QDZ4 Variation of peak Dpt with inclination squared.
qDz6 QDZ6 Peak residual moment Dmr = Dmr/ (Fz*R0)
qDz7 QDZ7 Variation of peak factor Dmr with load
qDz8 QDZ8 Variation of peak factor Dmr with inclination
Et qEz1 qEz2dfz qEz3dfz2
+ +( )=
1 qEz1 qEz2γz+( )2
π---
arc Bt Ct α t⋅ ⋅( )tan⋅
+
with Et 1≤( )
SHt qHz1 qHz2dfz qHz3 qHz4 dfz⋅+( )γz+ +=
Br qBz9λ Kyλ µy--------- qBz10 By Cy⋅ ⋅+⋅
ζ6⋅=
Cr ζ7=
Dr Fz qDz6 qDz7dfz+( ) γr⋅ qDz8 qDz9dfz+( ) γz⋅+[ ] Ro λ µγ ζ8 1–+⋅ ⋅ ⋅=
Kz t Ky α∂∂
– Mz at α≈ ⋅– 0 )= =
Adams/Tire
46
Turn-slip and Parking
For situations where turn-slip may be neglected and camber remains small, the reduction factors i that
appear in the equations for steady-state pure slip, are to be set to 1:
For larger values of spin, the reduction factors are given below.
The weighting function is used to let the longitudinal force diminish with increasing spin, according
to:
with:
The peak side force reduction factor reads:
with:
The cornering stiffness reduction factor is given by:
qDz9 QDZ9 Variation of Dmr with inclination and load
qEz1 QEZ1 Trail curvature Ept at Fznom
qEz2 QEZ2 Variation of curvature Ept with load
qEz3 QEZ3 Variation of curvature Ept with load squared
qEz4 QEZ4 Variation of curvature Ept with sign of Alpha-t
qEz5 QEZ5 Variation of Ept with inclination and sign Alpha-t
qHz1 QHZ1 Trail horizontal shift Sht at Fznom
qHz2 QHZ2 Variation of shift Sht with load
qHz3 QHZ3 Variation of shift Sht with inclination
qHz4 QHZ4 Variation of shift Sht with inclination and load
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
ζi
ζi 1= i 0.= 1.… 8
ζ1
ζi arc Bxϕ R0ϕ( )tan[ ]cos=
Bxϕ pDxϕ 1 1 pDxϕ 2dfz+( ) arc pDx ϕ 3κ( )tan[ ]cos=
ζ2
ζ2 arc Byϕ R0 ϕ pDyϕ 4 R0 ϕ+( ) tan[ ]cos=
Byϕ pDxϕ 1 1 pDxϕ 2dfz+( ) arc pDx ϕ 3 αtan( )tan[ ]cos=
ζ3
47Tire Models
The horizontal shift of the lateral force due to spin is given by:
The factors are defined by:
The spin force stiffness KyR0 is related to the camber stiffness Ky0:
in which the camber reduction factor is given by:
The reduction factors and for the vertical shift of the lateral force are given by:
The reduction factor for the residual moment reads:
The peak spin torque Dr is given by:
The maximum value is given by:
ζ3 arc pKyϕ 1R02ϕ2
( )tan[ ]cos=
SHyϕ DHyϕ CHyϕ arc BHyϕ Roϕ EHyϕ BHyϕ arc BHyϕ R0ϕ( )tan–( )– tan[ ]sin=
CHyϕ pHyϕ 1
DHyϕ pHyϕ 2 pHyϕ 3dfz+( ) Vx( )
EHyϕ
sin⋅
PHyϕ 4
BHyϕKyRϕ 0
CyDyKy0
-----------------------
=
=
=
=
KyRϕ 0
Kyγ0
1 εγ–-------------=
εγ pεγϕ 1 1 pεγϕ 2dfz+( )=
ζ0 ζ4
ζ0 0
ζ4 1 SHyϕ SVyγ Ky⁄–+
=
=
ζ8 1 Drϕ+=
ϕ
Drϕ DDrϕ e CDrϕ arc BDrϕ R0ϕ EDrϕ BDrϕ R0ϕ arc BDrϕ R0ϕ( )tan–( )– tan[ ]sin=
Adams/Tire
48
The moment at vanishing wheel speed at constant turning is given by:
The shape factors are given by:
in which:
The reduction factor reads:
The spin moment at 90º slip angle is given by:
The spin moment at 90º slip angle is multiplied by the weighing function Gy to account for the action of
the longitudinal slip (see steady-state combined slip equations).
The reduction factor is given by:
DDrϕ
Mzϕ ∞
π2---CDrϕ
sin
-----------------------------=
Mzϕ ∞ qCrϕ 1µyR0Fz Fz Fz0⁄=
CDrϕ qDrϕ 1
EDrϕ qDrϕ 2
BDrϕ
Kzγr0
CDrϕ DDr ϕ 1 εy–( )--------------------------------------------
=
=
=
Kzγr0 FzR0 qDz8 qDz9dfz+( )=
ζ6
ζ6 arc qBrϕ 1R0ϕ( )tan[ ]cos=
Mzϕ 90 Mzϕ ∞2
π--- arc qCr ϕ 2R0ϕ( ) Gyx κ( )⋅tan⋅ ⋅=
ζ7
ζ72
π--- arc Mzϕ 90 DDrϕ⁄[ ]cos⋅=
49Tire Models
Turn-Slip and Parking Parameters
The tire model parameters for turn-slip and parking are estimated automatically. In addition, you can
specify each parameter individually in the tire property file (see example).
Steady-State Combined Slip
PAC2002 has two methods for calculating the combined slip forces and moments. If the user supplies
the coefficients for the combined slip cosine 'weighing' functions, the combined slip is calculated
according to Combined slip with cosine 'weighing' functions (standard method). If no coefficients are
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
p 1 PECP1 Camber spin reduction factor parameter in camber stiffness
p 2 PECP2 Camber spin reduction factor varying with load parameter in
camber stiffness
pDx 1 PDXP1 Peak Fx reduction due to spin parameter
pDx 2 PDXP2 Peak Fx reduction due to spin with varying load parameter
pDx 3 PDXP3 Peak Fx reduction due to spin with kappa parameter
pDy 1 PDYP1 Peak Fy reduction due to spin parameter
pDy 2 PDYP2 Peak Fy reduction due to spin with varying load parameter
pDy 3 PDYP3 Peak Fy reduction due to spin with alpha parameter
pDy 4 PDYP4 Peak Fy reduction due to square root of spin parameter
pKy 1 PKYP1 Cornering stiffness reduction due to spin
pHy 1 PHYP1 Fy-alpha curve lateral shift limitation
pHy 2 PHYP2 Fy-alpha curve maximum lateral shift parameter
pHy 3 PHYP3 Fy-alpha curve maximum lateral shift varying with load
parameter
pHy 4 PHYP4 Fy-alpha curve maximum lateral shift parameter
qDt 1 QDTP1 Pneumatic trail reduction factor due to turn slip parameter
qBr 1 QBRP1 Residual (spin) torque reduction factor parameter due to side
slip
qCr 1 QCRP1 Turning moment at constant turning and zero forward speed
parameter
qCr 2 QCRP2 Turn slip moment (at alpha=90deg) parameter for increase
with spin
qDr 1 QDRP1 Turn slip moment peak magnitude parameter
qDr 2 QDRP2 Turn slip moment peak position parameter
εϕεϕ
ϕϕϕϕϕϕϕϕϕϕϕ
ϕϕϕ
ϕ
ϕ
ϕϕ
Adams/Tire
50
supplied, the so-called friction ellipse is used to estimate the combined slip forces and moments, see
section Combined Slip with friction ellipse
Combined slip with cosine 'weighing' functions
• Longitudinal Force at Combined Slip
• Lateral Force at Combined Slip
• Aligning Moment at Combined Slip
• Overturning Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
• Rolling Resistance Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
Formulas for the Longitudinal Force at Combined Slip
(60)
with Gx the weighting function of the longitudinal force for pure slip.
We write:
(61)
(62)
with coefficients:
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
The weighting function follows as:
(68)
Fx Fx0 Gxα α κ Fz, ,( )⋅=
α
Fx Dxα Cxαarc Bxαα s Exα Bxαα s arc Bxαα s( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos=
α s α SHxα+=
Bxα rBx1 arc rBx2κ tan[ ] λ xα⋅cos=
Cxα
Dxα
Fxo
Cxαarc BxαSHxα Exα BxαSHxα arc BxαSHxα( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Exα rEx1 rEx2dfz with Exα 1≤+=
SHxα rHx1=
Gxα
Cxαarc Bxαα s Exα Bxαα s arc Bxαα s( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
Cxαarc BxαSHxα Exα BxαSHxα arc BxαSHxα( )tan–( )–[ ]tan[ ]cos----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
51Tire Models
Longitudinal Force Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Lateral Force at Combined Slip
(69)
with Gyk the weighting function for the lateral force at pure slip and SVyk the ' -induced' side force;
therefore, the lateral force can be written as:
(70)
(71)
with the coefficients:
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
rBx1 RBX1 Slope factor for combined slip Fx reduction
rBx2 RBX2 Variation of slope Fx reduction with kappa
rCx1 RCX1 Shape factor for combined slip Fx reduction
rEx1 REX1 Curvature factor of combined Fx
rEx2 REX2 Curvature factor of combined Fx with load
rHx1 RHX1 Shift factor for combined slip Fx reduction
Fy Fy0 Gyκ α κ γ Fz, , ,( )⋅=
Fy Dyκ Cyκarc Byκκ s Eyκ Byκκs arc Byκκ s( )tan–( )– tan[ ] SVyκ+cos=
κ s κ SHyκ+=
Byκ rBy1 arc rBy2 α rBy3–( ) tan[ ] λ yκ⋅cos=
Cyκ rCy1=
Dyκ
Fyo
Cyκarc ByκSHyκ Eyκ ByκSHyκ arc ByκSHyκ( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Eyκ rEy1 rEy2dfz with Eyκ 1≤+=
SHyκ rHy1 rHy2dfz+=
SVyκ DVyκ rVy5arc rVy6κ( )tan[ ]sin=
Adams/Tire
52
(78)
The weighting function appears is defined as:
(79)
Lateral Force Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Aligning Moment at Combined Slip
(80)
with:
(81)
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
rBy1 RBY1 Slope factor for combined Fy reduction
rBy2 RBY2 Variation of slope Fy reduction with alpha
rBy3 RBY3 Shift term for alpha in slope Fy reduction
rCy1 RCY1 Shape factor for combined Fy reduction
rEy1 REY1 Curvature factor of combined Fy
rEy2 REY2 Curvature factor of combined Fy with load
rHy1 RHY1 Shift factor for combined Fy reduction
rHy2 RHY2 Shift factor for combined Fy reduction with load
rVy1 RVY1 Kappa induced side force Svyk/Muy*Fz at Fznom
rVy2 RVY2 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with load
rVy3 RVY3 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with inclination
rVy4 RVY4 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with alpha
rVy5 RVY5 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with kappa
rVy6 RVY6 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with atan (kappa)
DVyκ µyFz rVy1 rVy2dfz rVy3γ+ +( ) arc rVy4α( )tan[ ]cos⋅ ⋅=
Gyκ
Cyκarc Byκκ s Eyκ Byκκsarc Byκκs( )tan( )– tan[ ]cos
Cyκarc ByκSHyκ Eyκ ByκSHyκarc ByκSHyκ( )tan( )– tan[ ]cos---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
M'z t Fy' Mzr s Fx⋅+ +⋅–=
t t α t eq,( )=
53Tire Models
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
with the arguments:
(86)
(87)
Aligning Moment Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Overturning Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
For the overturning moment, the formula reads both for pure and combined slip situations:
(88)
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
ssz1 SSZ1 Nominal value of s/R0 effect of Fx on Mz
ssz2 SSZ2 Variation of distance s/R0 with Fy/Fznom
ssz3 SSZ3 Variation of distance s/R0 with inclination
ssz4 SSZ4 Variation of distance s/R0 with load and inclination
Dt Ctarc Btα t eq, Et Btα t eq, arc Btα t eq,( )tan–( )– tan[ ] α( )coscos=
F'y γ, 0= Fy SVyκ–=
Mzr Mzr α r eq,( ) Dr arc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ] α( )coscos= =
t t α t eq,( )=
α t eq, arc α2
t
Kx
Ky
------
2
κ2
α t( )sgn⋅+tantan=
α r eq, arc α2
r
Kx
Ky
------
2
κ2
α r( )sgn⋅+tantan=
Mx Ro Fz qSx1λ VMx qSx2 λ qSx3FyFz0--------⋅+⋅–
λ Mx⋅ ⋅=
Adams/Tire
54
Overturning Moment Coefficients
Formulas for Rolling Resistance Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
The rolling resistance moment is defined by:
(89)
If qsy1 and qsy2 are both zero and FITTYP is equal to 5 (MF-Tyre 5.0), then the rolling resistance is
calculated according to an old equation:
(90)
Rolling Resistance Coefficients
Combined Slip with friction ellipse
In case the tire property file does not contain the coefficients for the 'standard' combined slip method
(cosine 'weighing functions), the friction ellipse method is used, as described in this section. Note that
the method employed here is not part of one of the Magic Formula publications by Pacejka, but is an in-
house development of MSC.Software.
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qsx1 QSX1 Lateral force induced overturning couple
qsx2 QSX2 Inclination induced overturning couple
qsx3 QSX3 Fy induced overturning couple
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qsy1 QSY1 Rolling resistance moment coefficient
qsy2 QSY2 Rolling resistance moment depending on Fx
qsy3 QSY3 Rolling resistance moment depending on speed
qsy4 QSY4 Rolling resistance moment depending on speed^4
Vref LONGVL Measurement speed
My Ro Fz qSy1 qSy3Fx Fz0⁄ qSy3 Vx Vref( )⁄ qSy4Vx Vref( )⁄4
+ + + ⋅ ⋅=
My R0 SVx Kx SHx⋅+( )=
κc κ SHxSVxKx
---------+ +=
55Tire Models
The following friction coefficients are defined:
The forces corrected for the combined slip conditions are:
α c α SHySVy
Ky
---------+ +=
α∗ α c( )sin=
βκc
κc2
α∗ 2+
-------------------------
acos=
µx act,
Fx 0, SVx–
Fz-------------------------= µy act,
Fy 0, SVy–
Fz-------------------------=
µx max,
Dx
Fz------= µy max,
Dy
Fz------=
µx1
1
µx act,-------------
2 βtan
µy max,----------------
2+
---------------------------------------------------------=
µyβtan
1
µx max,----------------
2 βtan
µy act,-------------
2+
---------------------------------------------------------=
Fxµx
µx act,-------------Fx 0,= Fy
µy
µy act,-------------Fy 0,=
Adams/Tire
56
For aligning moment Mx, rolling resistance My and aligning moment Mz the formulae (76) until and
including (85) are used with =0.
Transient Behavior in PAC2002The previous Magic Formula equations are valid for steady-state tire behavior. When driving, however,
the tire requires some response time on changes of the inputs. In tire modeling terminology, the low-
frequency behavior (up to 15 Hz) is called transient behavior. PAC2002 provides two methods to model
transient tire behavior:
• Stretched String
• Contact Mass
Stretched String Model
For accurate transient tire behavior, you can use the stretched string tire model (see reference [1]). The
tire belt is modeled as stretched string, which is supported to the rim with lateral (and longitudinal)
springs. Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior shows a top-view of the string model. When
rolling, the first point having contact with the road adheres to the road (no sliding assumed). Therefore,
a lateral deflection of the string arises that depends on the slip angle size and the history of the lateral
deflection of previous points having contact with the road.
Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior
SVyκ
57Tire Models
For calculating the lateral deflection v1 of the string in the first point of contact with the road, the
following differential equation is valid:
(91)
with the relaxation length in the lateral direction. The turnslip can be neglected at radii larger
than 10 m. This differential equation cannot be used at zero speed, but when multiplying with Vx, the
equation can be transformed to:
(92)
When the tire is rolling, the lateral deflection depends on the lateral slip speed; at standstill, the deflection
depends on the relaxation length, which is a measure for the lateral stiffness of the tire. Therefore, with
this approach, the tire is responding to a slip speed when rolling and behaving like a spring at standstill.
A similar approach yields the following for the deflection of the string in longitudinal direction:
(93)
Both the longitudinal and lateral relaxation length are defined as of the vertical load:
(94)
(95)
Now the practical slip quantities, and , are defined based on the tire deformation:
(96)
(97)
Using these practical slip quantities, and , the Magic Formula equations can be used to calculate
the tire-road interaction forces and moments:
(98)
1
Vx
------td
dv1 v1σ α------+ α( ) aφ+tan=
σ α φ
σ α td
dv1Vx v1+ σ αVsy=
σ x td
du1Vx u1+ σ xVsx=
σ x Fz pTx1 pTx2dfz+( ) pTx3dfz( ) R0 Fz0⁄( )λ σ x⋅exp⋅ ⋅=
σ α pTy1Fz0 2arcFz
pTy2Fz0λ Fz0( )---------------------------------
tan 1 pKy3 γy–( ) R0λ Fz0 λ σ α⋅⋅ ⋅sin=
κ α
κ'u1
σ x
------ Vx( )sin⋅=
α 'v1σ α------
atan=
κ α
Fx Fx α ' κ' Fz, ,( )=
Adams/Tire
58
(99)
(100)
Coefficients and Transient Response
Contact Mass Model
The contact mass model is based on the separation of the contact patch slip properties and the tire carcass
compliance (see reference [1]). Instead of using relaxation lengths to describe compliance effects, the
carcass springs are explicitly incorporated in the model. The contact patch is given some inertia to ensure
computational causality. This modeling approach automatically accounts for the lagged response to slip
and load changes that diminish at higher levels of slip. The contact patch itself uses relaxation lengths to
handle simulations at low speed.
The contact patch can deflect in longitudinal, lateral, and yaw directions with respect to the lower part of
the wheel rim. A mass is attached to the contact patch to enable straightforward computations.
The differential equations that govern the dynamics of the contact patch body are:
The contact patch body with mass mc and inertia Jc is connected to the wheel through springs cx, cy, and
c and dampers kx, ky, and k in longitudinal, lateral, and yaw direction, respectively.
The additional equations for the longitudinal u, lateral v, and yaw deflections are:
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pTx1 PTX1 Longitudinal relaxation length at Fznom
pTx2 PTX2 Variation of longitudinal relaxation length with load
pTx3 PTX3 Variation of longitudinal relaxation length with exponent
of load
pTy1 PTY1 Peak value of relaxation length for lateral direction
pTy2 PTY2 Shape factor for lateral relaxation length
qTz1 QTZ1 Gyroscopic moment constant
Mbelt MBELT Belt mass of the wheel
Fy Fy α ' κ' γ Fz, , ,( )=
M'z M'z α ' κ' γ Fz, , ,( )=
mc V·cx Vcyψ
·c–( ) kxu
· cxu+ + Fx=
mc V·cy Vcxψ
·c–( ) kyu
· cyu+ + Fy=
Jcψ··c kψ β· cψ β+ + Mz=
ψ ψ
β
u· Vcx Vsx–=
59Tire Models
in which Vcx, Vcy and are the sliding velocity of the contact body in longitudinal, lateral, and yaw
directions, respectively. Vsx, Vsy, and are the corresponding velocities of the lower part of the wheel.
The transient slip equations for side slip, turn-slip, and camber are:
where the calculated deflection angle has been used:
The tire total spin velocity is:
With the transient slip equations, the composite transient turn-slip quantities are calculated:
v· Vcy Vsy–=
β· ψ· c ψ–=
ψ· c
ψ·
σ c td
d α ' Vx α '+ Vcy Vxβ– Vx βst+=
σ c td
dα 'tVx α 't+ Vx α '=
σ c td
dϕ 'cVx ϕ 'c+ ψ· γ=
σ F2 td
dϕ 'F2Vx ϕ 'cF2+ ψ· γ=
σ ϕ 1 td
dϕ '1Vx ϕ '1+ ψ· γ=
σ ϕ 2 td
dϕ '2Vx ϕ '2+ ψ· γ=
βstMz
cφ-------=
ψ· γ ψ c 1 εγ–( )Ω γsin–=
ϕ 'F 2ϕ 'c ϕ 'F2–=
ϕ 'M εϕ ϕ 'c εϕ 12 ϕ '1 ϕ '2–( )+=
Adams/Tire
60
The tire forces are calculated with and the tire moments with .
The relaxation lengths are reduced with slip:
Here a is half the contact length according to:
The composite tire parameter reads:
and the equivalent slip:
Coefficients and Transient Response
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
mc MC Contact body mass
Ic IC Contact body moment of inertia
kx KX Longitudinal damping
ky KY Lateral damping
k KP Yaw damping
cx CX Longitudinal stiffness
ϕ 'F ϕ 'M
σ c a 1 θζ–( )⋅=
σ 2
t0
a----σ c=
σ F2 bF2σ c=
σ ϕ 1 bϕ 1σ c=
σ ϕ 2 bϕ 2σ c=
a pA1R0 ρz
R0
------ pA2ρ zR0
------+
=
θKy0
2µyFx---------------=
ζ1
1 κ'+------------- α ' aεϕ 12 ϕ '1 ϕ '2–+
2 Kx0
Ky0
---------
2
κ'2
3---b ϕ 'c+
2
+=
ϕ
61Tire Models
The remaining contact mass model parameters are estimated automatically based on longitudinal and
lateral stiffness specified in the tire property file.
Gyroscopic Couple in PAC2002When having fast rotations about the vertical axis in the wheel plane, the inertia of the tire belt may lead
to gyroscopic effects. To cope with this additional moment, the following contribution is added to the
total aligning moment:
(101)
with the parameter (in addition to the basic tire parameter mbelt):
(102)
and:
(103)
The total aligning moment now becomes:
(104)
cy CY Lateral stiffness
c CP Yaw stiffness
pA1 PA1 Half contact length with vertical tire deflection
pA2 PA2 Half contact length with square root of vertical tire
deflection
EP Composite turn-slip (moment)
EP12 Composite turn-slip (moment) increment
bF2 BF2 Second relaxation length factor
b 1 BP1 First moment relaxation length factor
b 2 BP2 Second moment relaxation length factor
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
ϕ
εϕεϕ 12
ϕϕ
Mz gyr, cgyrmbeltVrl td
dvarc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ]cos=
cgyr qTz1 λ gyr⋅=
arc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ]cos 1=
Mz M'z Mz gyr,+=
Adams/Tire
62
Coefficients and Transient Response
Left and Right Side TiresIn general, a tire produces a lateral force and aligning moment at zero slip angle due to the tire
construction, known as conicity and plysteer. In addition, the tire characteristics cannot be symmetric for
positive and negative slip angles.
A tire property file with the parameters for the model results from testing with a tire that is mounted in a
tire test bench comparable either to the left or the right side of a vehicle. If these coefficients are used for
both the left and the right side of the vehicle model, the vehicle does not drive straight at zero steering
wheel angle.
The latest versions of tire property files contain a keyword TYRESIDE in the [MODEL] section that
indicates for which side of the vehicle the tire parameters in that file are valid (TIRESIDE = 'LEFT' or
TIRESIDE = 'RIGHT').
If this keyword is available, Adams/Car corrects for the conicity and plysteer and asymmetry when using
a tire property file on the opposite side of the vehicle. In fact, the tire characteristics are mirrored with
respect to slip angle zero. In Adams/View, this option can only be used when the tire is generated by the
graphical user interface: select Build -> Forces -> Special Force: Tire.
Next to the LEFT and RIGHT side option of TYRESIDE, you can also set SYMMETRIC: then the tire
characteristics are modified during initialization to show symmetric performance for left and right side
corners and zero conicity and plysteer (no offsets).Also, when you set the tire property file to
SYMMETRIC, the tire characteristics are changed to symmetric behavior.
Create Wheel and Tire Dialog Box in Adams/View
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
pTx1 PTX1 Longitudinal relaxation length at Fznom
pTx2 PTX2 Variation of longitudinal relaxation length with load
pTx3 PTX3 Variation of longitudinal relaxation length with exponent of
load
pTy1 PTY1 Peak value of relaxation length for lateral direction
pTy2 PTY2 Shape factor for lateral relaxation length
qTz1 QTZ1 Gyroscopic moment constant
Mbelt MBELT Belt mass of the wheel
63Tire Models
USE_MODES of PAC2002: from Simple to ComplexThe parameter USE_MODE in the tire property file allows you to switch the output of the PAC2002 tire
model from very simple (that is, steady-state cornering) to complex (transient combined cornering and
braking).
The options for the USE_MODE and the output of the model have been listed in the table below.
Adams/Tire
64
USE_MODE Values of PAC2002 and Related Tire Model Output
Quality Checks for the Tire Model ParametersBecause PAC2002 uses an empirical approach to describe tire - road interaction forces, incorrect
parameters can easily result in non-realistic tire behavior. Below is a list of the most important items to
ensure the quality of the parameters in a tire property file:
• Rolling Resistance
• Camber (Inclination) Effects
• Validity Range of the Tire Model Input
USE_MODE: State: Slip conditions:
PAC2002 output(forces and moments):
0 Steady state Acts as a vertical spring &
damper
0, 0, Fz, 0, 0, 0
1 Steady state Pure longitudinal slip Fx, 0, Fz, 0, My, 0
2 Steady state Pure lateral (cornering) slip 0, Fy, Fz, Mx, 0, Mz
3 Steady state Longitudinal and lateral (not
combined)
Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
4 Steady state Combined slip Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
11 Transient Pure longitudinal slip Fx, 0, Fz, 0, My, 0
12 Transient Pure lateral (cornering) slip 0, Fy, Fz, Mx, 0, Mz
13 Transient Longitudinal and lateral (not
combined)
Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
14 Transient Combined slip Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
15 Transient Combined slip and Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
21 Advanced transient Pure longitudinal slip Fx, 0, Fz, My, 0
22 Advanced transient Pure lateral (cornering slip) 0, Fy, Fz, Mx, 0, Mz
23 Advanced transient Longitudinal and lateral (not
combined)
Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
24 Advanced transient Combined slip Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
25 Advanced transient Combined slip and Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
Note: Do not change Fz0 (FNOMIN) and R0 (UNLOADED_RADIUS) in your tire property file.
It will change the complete tire characteristics because these two parameters are used to
make all parameters without dimension.
65Tire Models
Rolling Resistance
For a realistic rolling resistance, the parameter qsy1 must be positive. For car tires, it can be in the order
of 0.006 - 0.01 (0.6% - 1.0%); for heavy commercial truck tires, it can be around 0.006 (0.6%).
Tire property files with the keyword FITTYP=5 determine the rolling resistance in a different way (see
equation (85)). To avoid the ‘old’ rolling resistance calculation, remove the keyword FITTYP and add a
section like the following:
$---------------------------------------------------rolling resistance[ROLLING_COEFFICIENTS]QSY1 = 0.01QSY2 = 0QSY3 = 0QSY4 = 0
Camber (Inclination) Effects
Camber stiffness has not been explicitly defined in PAC2002; however, for car tires, positive inclination
should result in a negative lateral force at zero slip angle. If positive inclination results in an increase of
the lateral force, the coefficient may not be valid for the ISO but for the SAE coordinate system. Note
that PAC2002 only uses coefficients for the TYDEX W-axis (ISO) system.
Effect of Positive Camber on the Lateral Force in TYDEX W-axis (ISO) System
The table below lists further checks on the PAC2002 parameters.
Adams/Tire
66
Checklist for PAC2002 Parameters and Properties
Validity Range of the Tire Model Input
In the tire property file, a range of the input variables has been given in which the tire properties are
supposed to be valid. These validity range parameters are (the listed values can be different):
$------------------------------------------------------long_slip_range[LONG_SLIP_RANGE]KPUMIN
= -1.5 $Minimum valid wheel slip
KPUMAX = 1.5
$Maximum valid wheel slip$-----------------------------------------------------slip_angle_range[SLIP_ANGLE_RANGE]ALPMIN
= -1.5708 $Minimum valid slip angle
ALPMAX = 1.5708 $Maximum valid slip angle
$-----------------------------------------------inclination_slip_range[INCLINATION_ANGLE_RANGE]CAMMIN
= -0.26181 $Minimum valid camber angle
CAMMAX = 0.26181 $Maximum valid camber angle
$-------------------------------------------------vertical_force_range
Parameter/property: Requirement: Explanation:
LONGVL 1 m/s Reference velocity at which parameters are
measured
VXLOW Approximately 1 m/s Threshold for scaling down forces and moments
Dx > 0 Peak friction (see equation (22))
pDx1/pDx2 < 0 Peak friction Fx must decrease with increasing load
Kx > 0 Long slip stiffness (see equation (25))
Dy > 0 Peak friction (see equation (34))
pDy1/pDy2 < 0 Peak friction Fx must decrease with increasing load
Ky < 0 Cornering stiffness (see equation (37))
qsy1 > 0 Rolling resistance, in the range of 0.005 - 0.015
67Tire Models
[VERTICAL_FORCE_RANGE]FZMIN
= 225 $Minimum allowed wheel load
FZMAX = 10125 $Maximum allowed wheel load
If one of the input parameters exceeds a minimum or maximum validity value, the calculation in the tire
model is performed with the minimum or maximum value of this range to avoid non-realistic tire
behavior. In that case, a message appears warning you that one of the inputs exceeds a validity value.
Standard Tire Interface (STI) for PAC2002Because all Adams products use the Standard Tire Interface (STI) for linking the tire models to
Adams/Solver, below is a brief background of the STI history (see also reference [4]).
At the First International Colloquium on Tire Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis on October 21-22,
1991, the International Tire Workshop working group was established (TYDEX).
The working group concentrated on tire measurements and tire models used for vehicle simulation
purposes. For most vehicle dynamics studies, people used to develop their own tire models. Because all
car manufacturers and their tire suppliers have the same goal (that is, development of tires to improve
dynamic safety of the vehicle) it aimed for standardization in tire behavior description.
In TYDEX, two expert groups, consisting of participants of vehicle industry (passenger cars and trucks),
tire manufacturers, other suppliers and research laboratories, had been defined with following goals:
• The first expert group's (Tire Measurements - Tire Modeling) main goal was to specify an
interface between tire measurements and tire models. The result was the TYDEX-Format [2] to
describe tire measurement data.
• The second expert group's (Tire Modeling - Vehicle Modeling) main goal was to specify an
interface between tire models and simulation tools, which resulted in the Standard Tire Interface
(STI) [3]. The use of this interface should ensure that a wide range of simulation software can be
linked to a wide range of tire modeling software.
Definitions• General
• Tire Kinematics
• Slip Quantities
• Force and Moments
Adams/Tire
68
General
General Definitions
Tire Kinematics
Tire Kinematics Definitions
Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities Definitions
Term: Definition:
Road tangent plane Plane with the normal unit vector (tangent to the road) in the tire-road contact
point C.
C-axis system Coordinate system mounted on the wheel carrier at the wheel center
according to TYDEX, ISO orientation.
Wheel plane The plane in the wheel center that is formed by the wheel when considered a
rigid disc with zero width.
Contact point C Contact point between tire and road, defined as the intersection of the wheel
plane and the projection of the wheel axis onto the road plane.
W-axis system Coordinate system at the tire contact point C, according to TYDEX, ISO
orientation.
Parameter: Definition: Units:
R0 Unloaded tire radius [m]
R Loaded tire radius [m]
Re Effective tire radius [m]
Radial tire deflection [m]
d Dimensionless radial tire deflection [-]
Fz0 Radial tire deflection at nominal load [m]
mbelt Tire belt mass [kg]
Rotational velocity of the wheel [rads-1]
Parameter: Definition: Units:
V Vehicle speed [ms-1]
Vsx Slip speed in x direction [ms-1]
Vsy Slip speed in y direction [ms-1]
Vs Resulting slip speed [ms-1]
Vx Rolling speed in x direction [ms-1]
ρρρ
ω
69Tire Models
Forces and Moments
Force and Moment Definitions
References1. H.B. Pacejka, Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics, 2002, Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 0 7506 5141 5.
2. H.-J. Unrau, J. Zamow, TYDEX-Format, Description and Reference Manual, Release 1.1,
Initiated by the International Tire Working Group, July 1995.
3. A. Riedel, Standard Tire Interface, Release 1.2, Initiated by the Tire Workgroup, June 1995.
4. J.J.M. van Oosten, H.-J. Unrau, G. Riedel, E. Bakker, TYDEX Workshop: Standardisation of
Data Exchange in Tyre Testing and Tyre Modelling, Proceedings of the 2nd International
Colloquium on Tyre Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis, Vehicle System Dynamics, Volume
27, Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam/Lisse, 1996.
Example of PAC2002 Tire Property File[MDI_HEADER]FILE_TYPE
='tir'FILE_VERSION
=3.0FILE_FORMAT
Vy Lateral speed of tire contact center [ms-1]
Vr Linear speed of rolling [ms-1]
Longitudinal slip [-]
Slip angle [rad]
Inclination angle [rad]
Abbreviation: Definition: Units:
Fz Vertical wheel load [N]
Fz0 Nominal load [N]
dfz Dimensionless vertical load [-]
Fx Longitudinal force [N]
Fy Lateral force [N]
Mx Overturning moment [Nm]
My Braking/driving moment [Nm]
Mz Aligning moment [Nm]
Parameter: Definition: Units:
καγ
Adams/Tire
70
='ASCII'! : TIRE_VERSION :
PAC2002! : COMMENT :
Tire 235/60R16
! : COMMENT : Manufacturer
! : COMMENT : Nom. section with
(m) 0.235
! : COMMENT : Nom. aspect ratio
(-) 60
! : COMMENT : Infl. pressure
(Pa) 200000
! : COMMENT : Rim radius
(m) 0.19
! : COMMENT : Measurement ID
! : COMMENT : Test speed
(m/s) 16.6! : COMMENT :
Road surface! : COMMENT :
Road condition Dry
! : FILE_FORMAT : ASCII
! : Copyright MSC.Software, Fri Jan 23 14:30:06 2004!! USE_MODE specifies the type of calculation performed:! 0: Fz only, no Magic Formula evaluation! 1: Fx,My only! 2: Fy,Mx,Mz only! 3: Fx,Fy,Mx,My,Mz uncombined force/moment calculation! 4: Fx,Fy,Mx,My,Mz combined force/moment calculation! +10: including relaxation behaviour! *-1: mirroring of tyre characteristics!! example: USE_MODE = -12 implies:! -calculation of Fy,Mx,Mz only! -including relaxation effects! -mirrored tyre characteristics!$----------------------------------------------------------------units[UNITS]
71Tire Models
LENGTH ='meter'
FORCE ='newton'
ANGLE ='radians'
MASS ='kg'
TIME ='second'
$----------------------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT='PAC2002'USE_MODE
= 14 $Tyre use switch (IUSED)
VXLOW = 1
LONGVL = 16.6
$Measurement speedTYRESIDE
= 'LEFT' $Mounted side of tyre at vehicle/test bench
$-----------------------------------------------------------dimensions[DIMENSION]UNLOADED_RADIUS
= 0.344 $Free tyre radius
WIDTH = 0.235
$Nominal section width of the tyreASPECT_RATIO
= 0.6 $Nominal aspect ratio
RIM_RADIUS = 0.19
$Nominal rim radiusRIM_WIDTH
= 0.16 $Rim width
$----------------------------------------------------------------shape[SHAPE]radial width 1.0
0.0 1.0
0.4 1.0
0.9 0.9
Adams/Tire
72
1.0$------------------------------------------------------------parameter[VERTICAL]VERTICAL_STIFFNESS = 2.1e+005 $Tyre vertical stiffness
VERTICAL_DAMPING = 50
$Tyre vertical dampingBREFF
= 8.4 $Low load stiffness e.r.r.
DREFF = 0.27
$Peak value of e.r.r.FREFF
= 0.07 $High load stiffness e.r.r.
FNOMIN = 4850
$Nominal wheel load$-----------------------------------------------------------load_curve$ For a non-linear tire vertical stiffness (optional)$ Maximum of 100 points[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen
fz0.000
0.00.001
212.00.002
428.00.003
648.00.005
1100.00.010
2300.00.020
5000.00.030
8100.0$------------------------------------------------------long_slip_range[LONG_SLIP_RANGE]KPUMIN
= -1.5 $Minimum valid wheel slip
KPUMAX = 1.5
$Maximum valid wheel slip
73Tire Models
$-----------------------------------------------------slip_angle_range[SLIP_ANGLE_RANGE]ALPMIN
= -1.5708 $Minimum valid slip angle
ALPMAX = 1.5708
$Maximum valid slip angle$-----------------------------------------------inclination_slip_range[INCLINATION_ANGLE_RANGE]CAMMIN
= -0.26181 $Minimum valid camber angle
CAMMAX = 0.26181
$Maximum valid camber angle$-------------------------------------------------vertical_force_range[VERTICAL_FORCE_RANGE]FZMIN
= 225 $Minimum allowed wheel load
FZMAX = 10125
$Maximum allowed wheel load$--------------------------------------------------------------scaling[SCALING_COEFFICIENTS]LFZO
= 1 $Scale factor of nominal (rated) load
LCX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx shape factorLMUX
= 1 $Scale factor of Fx peak friction coefficient
LEX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx curvature factorLKX
= 1 $Scale factor of Fx slip stiffness
LHX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx horizontal shiftLVX
= 1 $Scale factor of Fx vertical shift
LGAX = 1
$Scale factor of camber for Fx
Adams/Tire
74
LCY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy shape factorLMUY
= 1 $Scale factor of Fy peak friction coefficient
LEY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy curvature factorLKY
= 1 $Scale factor of Fy cornering stiffness
LHY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy horizontal shiftLVY
= 1 $Scale factor of Fy vertical shift
LGAY = 1
$Scale factor of camber for FyLTR
= 1 $Scale factor of Peak of pneumatic trail
LRES = 1
$Scale factor for offset of residual torqueLGAZ
= 1 $Scale factor of camber for Mz
LXAL = 1
$Scale factor of alpha influence on FxLYKA
= 1 $Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
LVYKA = 1
$Scale factor of kappa induced FyLS
= 1 $Scale factor of Moment arm of FxL
SGKP = 1
$Scale factor of Relaxation length of FxLSGAL
= 1 $Scale factor of Relaxation length of Fy
LGYR = 1
$Scale factor of gyroscopic torqueLMX
= 1 $Scale factor of overturning couple
75Tire Models
LVMX = 1
$Scale factor of Mx vertical shiftLMY
= 1 $Scale factor of rolling resistance torque
$---------------------------------------------------------longitudinal[LONGITUDINAL_COEFFICIENTS]PCX1
= 1.6411 $Shape factor Cfx for longitudinal force
PDX1 = 1.1739 $Longitudinal friction Mux at Fznom
PDX2 = -0.16395
$Variation of friction Mux with loadPDX3
= 0 $Variation of friction Mux with camber
PEX1 = 0.46403 $Longitudinal curvature Efx at Fznom
PEX2 = 0.25022 $Variation of curvature Efx with load
PEX3 = 0.067842
$Variation of curvature Efx with load squaredPEX4
= -3.7604e-005 $Factor in curvature Efx while driving
PKX1 = 22.303 $Longitudinal slip stiffness Kfx/Fz at Fznom
PKX2 = 0.48896 $Variation of slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
PKX3 = 0.21253 $Exponent in slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
PHX1 = 0.0012297
$Horizontal shift Shx at FznomPHX2
= 0.0004318 $Variation of shift Shx with load
PVX1 = -8.8098e-006
$Vertical shift Svx/Fz at FznomPVX2
= 1.862e-005 $Variation of shift Svx/Fz with loadRBX1
Adams/Tire
76
= 13.276 $Slope factor for combined slip Fx reduction
RBX2 = -13.778
$Variation of slope Fx reduction with kappaRCX1
= 1.2568 $Shape factor for combined slip Fx reduction
REX1 = 0.65225
$Curvature factor of combined FxREX2
= -0.24948 $Curvature factor of combined Fx with load
RHX1 = 0.0050722
$Shift factor for combined slip Fx reductionPTX1
= 2.3657 $Relaxation length SigKap0/Fz at Fznom
PTX2 = 1.4112 $Variation of SigKap0/Fz with load
PTX3 = 0.56626
$Variation of SigKap0/Fz with exponent of load$----------------------------------------------------------overturning[OVERTURNING_COEFFICIENTS]QSX1
= 0 $Lateral force induced overturning moment
QSX2 = 0
$Camber induced overturning coupleQSX3
= 0 $Fy induced overturning couple
$--------------------------------------------------------------lateral[LATERAL_COEFFICIENTS]PCY1
= 1.3507 $Shape factor Cfy for lateral forces
PDY1 = 1.0489 $Lateral friction Muy
PDY2 = -0.18033
$Variation of friction Muy with loadPDY3
= -2.8821 $Variation of friction Muy with squared camber
PEY1
77Tire Models
= -0.0074722 $Lateral curvature Efy at FznomPEY2
= -0.0063208 $Variation of curvature Efy with loadPEY3
= -9.9935 $Zero order camber dependency of curvature Efy
PEY4 = -760.14 $Variation of curvature Efy with camber
PKY1 = -21.92 $Maximum value of stiffness Kfy/Fznom
PKY2 = 2.0012 $Load at which Kfy reaches maximum value
PKY3 = -0.024778
$Variation of Kfy/Fznom with camberPHY1
= 0.0026747 $Horizontal shift Shy at Fznom
PHY2 = 8.9094e-005$Variation of shift Shy with load
PHY3 = 0.031415
$Variation of shift Shy with camberPVY1
= 0.037318 $Vertical shift in Svy/Fz at Fznom
PVY2 = -0.010049
$Variation of shift Svy/Fz with loadPVY3
= -0.32931 $Variation of shift Svy/Fz with camber
PVY4 = -0.69553
$Variation of shift Svy/Fz with camber and loadRBY1
= 7.1433 $Slope factor for combined Fy reduction
RBY2 = 9.1916 $Variation of slope Fy reduction with alpha
RBY3 = -0.027856
$Shift term for alpha in slope Fy reductionRCY1
= 1.0719 $Shape factor for combined Fy reduction
REY1 = -0.27572
$Curvature factor of combined FyREY2
Adams/Tire
78
= 0.32802 $Curvature factor of combined Fy with load
RHY1 = 5.7448e-006$Shift factor for combined Fy reduction
RHY2 = -3.1368e-005
$Shift factor for combined Fy reduction RVY1
= -0.027825 $Kappa induced side force Svyk/Muy*Fz at Fznom
RVY2 = 0.053604
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with loadRVY3
= -0.27568 $Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with camber
RVY4 = 12.12 $Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with alpha
RVY5 = 1.9$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with kappa
RVY6 = -10.704
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with atan(kappa)PTY1
= 2.1439 $Peak value of relaxation length SigAlp0/R0
PTY2 = 1.9829 $Value of Fz/Fznom where SigAlp0 is extreme
$---------------------------------------------------rolling resistance[ROLLING_COEFFICIENTS]QSY1
= 0.01 $Rolling resistance torque coefficient
QSY2 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on FxQSY3
= 0 $Rolling resistance torque depending on speed
QSY4 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on speed ^4$-------------------------------------------------------------aligning[ALIGNING_COEFFICIENTS]QBZ1
= 10.904 $Trail slope factor for trail Bpt at Fznom
QBZ2 = -1.8412
$Variation of slope Bpt with load
79Tire Models
QBZ3 = -0.52041
$Variation of slope Bpt with load squaredQBZ4
= 0.039211 $Variation of slope Bpt with camber
QBZ5 = 0.41511 $Variation of slope Bpt with absolute camber
QBZ9 = 8.9846 $Slope factor Br of residual torque Mzr
QBZ10 = 0
$Slope factor Br of residual torque MzrQCZ1
= 1.2136 $Shape factor Cpt for pneumatic trail
QDZ1 = 0.093509
$Peak trail Dpt" = Dpt*(Fz/Fznom*R0)QDZ2
= -0.0092183 $Variation of peak Dpt" with loadQDZ3
= -0.057061 $Variation of peak Dpt" with camber
QDZ4 = 0.73954 $Variation of peak Dpt" with camber squared
QDZ6 = -0.0067783 $Peak residual torque Dmr" = Dmr/(Fz*R0)
QDZ7 = 0.0052254
$Variation of peak factor Dmr" with loadQDZ8
= -0.18175 $Variation of peak factor Dmr" with camber
QDZ9 = 0.029952
$Var. of peak factor Dmr" with camber and loadQEZ1
= -1.5697 $Trail curvature Ept at Fznom
QEZ2 = 0.33394 $Variation of curvature Ept with load
QEZ3 = 0
$Variation of curvature Ept with load squaredQEZ4
= 0.26711 $Variation of curvature Ept with sign of Alpha-t
QEZ5 = -3.594
Adams/Tire
80
$Variation of Ept with camber and sign Alpha-tQHZ1
= 0.0047326 $Trail horizontal shift Sht at Fznom
QHZ2 = 0.0026687
$Variation of shift Sht with loadQHZ3
= 0.11998 $Variation of shift Sht with camber
QHZ4 = 0.059083
$Variation of shift Sht with camber and loadSSZ1
= 0.033372 $Nominal value of s/R0: effect of Fx on Mz
SSZ2 = 0.0043624
$Variation of distance s/R0 with Fy/FznomSSZ3
= 0.56742 $Variation of distance s/R0 with camber
SSZ4 = -0.24116
$Variation of distance s/R0 with load and camberQTZ1
= 0.2 $Gyration torque constant
MBELT = 5.4
$Belt mass of the wheel$-----------------------------------------------turn-slip parameters
[TURNSLIP_COEFFICIENTS]
PECP1 = 0.7
$Camber stiffness reduction factor
PECP2 = 0.0
$Camber stiffness reduction factor with load
PDXP1 = 0.4
$Peak Fx reduction due to spin
PDXP2 = 0.0
$Peak Fx reduction due to spin with load
PDXP3 = 0.0
$Peak Fx reduction due to spin with longitudinal slip
81Tire Models
PDYP1 = 0.4
$Peak Fy reduction due to spin
PDYP2 = 0.0
$Peak Fy reduction due to spin with load
PDYP3 = 0.0
$Peak Fy reduction due to spin with lateral slip
PDYP4 = 0.0
$Peak Fy reduction with square root of spin
PKYP1 = 1.0
$Cornering stiffness reduction due to spin
PHYP1 = 1.0
$Fy lateral shift shape factor
PHYP2 = 0.15
$Maximum Fy lateral shift
PHYP3 = 0.0
$Maximum Fy lateral shift with load
PHYP4 = -4.0
$Fy lateral shift curvature factor
QDTP1 = 10.0
$Pneumatic trail reduction factor
QBRP1 = 0.1
$Residual torque reduction factor with lateral slip
QCRP1 = 0.2
$Turning moment at constant turning with zero speed
QCRP2 = 0.1
$Turning moment at 90 deg lateral slip
QDRP1
Adams/Tire
82
= 1.0 $Maximum turning moment
QDRP2 = -1.5
$Location of maximum turning moment
$----------------------------------------------contact patch parameters
[CONTACT_COEFFICIENTS]
PA1 = 0.4147
$Half contact length dependency on Fz)
PA2 = 1.9129
$Half contact length dependency on sqrt(Fz/R0)
$-----------------------------------------------contact patch slip model
[DYNAMIC_COEFFICIENTS]
MC = 1.0 $Contact mass
IC = 0.05 $Contact moment of inertia
KX = 409.0
$Contact longitudinal damping
KY = 320.8
$Contact lateral damping
KP = 11.9 $Contact yaw damping
CX = 4.350e+005 $Contact longitudinal stiffness
CY = 1.665e+005 $Contact lateral stiffness
CP = 20319
$Contact yaw stiffness
83Tire Models
EP = 1.0
EP12 = 4.0
BF2 = 0.5
BP1 = 0.5
BP2 = 0.67
$--------------------------------------------------------loaded radius[LOADED_RADIUS_COEFFICIENTS]QV1
= 0.000071 $Tire radius growth coefficient
QV2 = 2.489 $Tire stiffness variation coefficient with speed
QFCX1 = 0.1
$Tire stiffness interaction with FxQFCY1
= 0.3 $Tire stiffness interaction with Fy
QFCG1 = 0.0
$Tire stiffness interaction with camberQFZ1
= 0.0 $Linear stiffness coefficient, if zero, VERTICAL_STIFFNESS is
takenQFZ2
= 14.35 $Tire vertical stiffness coefficient (quadratic)
Contact MethodsThe PAC2002 model supports the following roads:
• 2D Roads, see Using the 2D Road Model
• 3D Roads, see Adams/3D Road Model
Note that the PAC2002 model has only one point of contact with the road; therefore, the wavelength of
road obstacles must be longer than the tire radius for realistic output of the model. In addition, the contact
force computed by this tire model is normal to the road plane. Therefore, the contact point does not
generate a longitudinal force when rolling over a short obstacle, such as a cleat or pothole.
Adams/Tire
84
For ride and comfort analyses, we recommend more sophisticated tire models, such as Ftire.
85Tire Models
Using the PAC-TIME Tire ModelThe PAC-TIME Magic-Formula tire model has been developed by MSC.Software according to a
publication, A New Tyre Model for TIME Measurement Data, by J.J.M. van Oosten e.a. [5]. PAC-TIME
has improved equations for side force and aligning moment under pure slip conditions. For longitudinal
pure slip and combined slip, the tire model is similar to PAC-TIME.
Learn about:
• When to Use PAC-TIME
• Modeling of Tire-Road Interaction Forces
• Axis Systems and Slip Definitions
• Contact Point and Normal Load Calculation
• Basics of Magic Formula
• Steady-State: Magic Formula
• Transient Behavior
• Gyroscopic Couple
• Left and Right Side Tires
• USE_MODES OF PAC-TIME: from Simple to Complex
• Quality Checks for Tire Model Parameters
• Standard Tire Interface (STI)
• Definitions
• References
• Example of PAC-TIME Tire Property File
• Contact Methods
When to Use PAC-TIMEMagic-Formula (MF) tire models are considered the state-of-the-art for modeling tire-road interaction
forces in vehicle dynamics applications. Since 1987, Pacejka and others have published several versions
of this type of tire model. The PAC-TIME model is similar to PAC2002, but has improved equations for
side force (Fy) and aligning moment (Mz) under pure side slip conditions.
The following is background information about the PAC-TIME tire model, as stated in the paper, A New
Tyre Model for TIME Measurement Data, J.J.M. van Oosten, E. Kuiper, G. Leister, D. Bode, H.
Schindler, J. Tischleder, S. Köhne [5]:
In 1999 a new method for tyre Force and Moment (F&M) testing has been developed by a consortium of
European tyre and vehicle manufacturers: the TIME procedure. For Vehicle Dynamics studies often a
Magic Formula (MF) tyre model is used based upon such F&M data. However when calculating MF
parameters for a standard MF model out of the TIME F&M data, several difficulties are observed. These
are mainly due to the non-uniform distribution of the data points over the slip angle, camber and load
area and the mutual dependency in between the slip angle, camber and load. A new MF model for pure
cornering slip conditions has been developed that allows the calculation of the MF parameters despite
of the dependency of the three input variables in the F&M data and shows better agreement with the
Adams/Tire
86
measured F&M data points. From mathematical point of view the optimisation process for deriving MF
parameters is better conditioned with the new MF-TIME, resulting in less sensitivity to starting values
and better convergence to a global minimum. In addition the MF-TIME has improved extrapolation
performance compared to the standard MF models for areas where no F&M data points are available.
Next to the use for TIME F&M data, the new model is expected to have interesting prospects for
converting ‘on-vehicle’ measured tyre data into a robust set of MF parameters.
In general, an MF tire model describes the tire behavior for rather smooth roads (road obstacle
wavelengths longer than the tire radius) up to frequencies of 8 Hz. This makes the tire model applicable
for all generic vehicle handling and stability simulations, including:
• Steady-state cornering
• Single- or double-lane change
• Braking or power-off in a turn
• Split-mu braking tests
• J-turn or other turning maneuvers
• ABS braking, when stopping distance is important (not for tuning ABS control strategies)
• Other common vehicle dynamics maneuvers on rather smooth roads (wavelength of road
obstacles must be longer than the tire radius)
For modeling roll-over of a vehicle, you must pay special attention to the overturning moment
characteristics of the tire (Mx), and the loaded radius modeling. The last item may not be sufficiently
addressed in this model.
The PAC-TIME model has been developed for car tires with camber (inclination) angles to the road not
exceeding 15 degrees.
Modeling of Tire-Road Interaction ForcesFor vehicle dynamics applications, an accurate knowledge of tire-road interaction forces is inevitable
because the movements of a vehicle primarily depend on the road forces on the tires. These interaction
forces depend on both road and tire properties, and the motion of the tire with respect to the road.
In the radial direction, the MF tire models consider the tire to behave as a parallel linear spring and linear
damper with one point of contact with the road surface. The contact point is determined by considering
the tire and wheel as a rigid disc. In the contact point between the tire and the road, the contact forces in
longitudinal and lateral direction strongly depend on the slip between the tire patch elements and the
road.
The figure, Input and Output Variables of the Magic Formula Tire Model, presents the input and output
vectors of the PAC2002 tire model. The tire model subroutine is linked to the Adams/Solver through the
Standard Tire Interface (STI) [3]. The input through the STI consists of:
• Position and velocities of the wheel center
• Orientation of the wheel
• Tire model (MF) parameters
87Tire Models
• Road parameters
The tire model routine calculates the vertical load and slip quantities based on the position and speed of
the wheel with respect to the road. The input for the Magic Formula consists of the wheel load (Fz), the
longitudinal and lateral slip ( , ), and inclination angle ( ) with the road. The output is the forces
(Fx, Fy) and moments (Mx, My, Mz) in the contact point between the tire and the road. For calculating
these forces, the MF equations use a set of MF parameters, which are derived from tire testing data.
The forces and moments out of the Magic Formula are transferred to the wheel center and returned to
Adams/Solver through STI.
Input and Output Variables of the Magic Formula Tire Model
Axis Systems and Slip Definitions• Axis Systems
• Units
• Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
Axis Systems
The PAC-TIME model is linked to Adams/Solver using the TYDEX STI conventions, as described in
the TYDEX-Format [2] and the STI [3].
κ α γ
Adams/Tire
88
The STI interface between the MF-TIME model and Adams/Solver mainly passes information to the tire
model in the C-axis coordinate system. In the tire model itself, a conversion is made to the W-axis system
because all the modeling of the tire behavior, as described in this help, assumes to deal with the slip
quantities, orientation, forces, and moments in the contact point with the TYDEX W-axis system. Both
axis systems have the ISO orientation but have different origin as can be seen in the figure below.
TYDEX C- and W-Axis Systems Used in PAC-TIME , Source [2]
The C-axis system is fixed to the wheel carrier with the longitudinal xc-axis parallel to the road and in
the wheel plane (xc-zc-plane). The origin of the C-axis system is the wheel center.
The origin of the W-axis system is the road contact-point defined by the intersection of the wheel plane,
the plane through the wheel carrier, and the road tangent plane.
The forces and moments calculated by PAC-TIME using the MF equations in this guide are in the W-axis
system. A transformation is made in the source code to return the forces and moments through the STI
to Adams/Solver.
The inclination angle is defined as the angle between the wheel plane and the normal to the road tangent
plane (xw-yw-plane).
Units
The units of information transferred through the STI between Adams/Solver and PAC-TIME are
according to the SI unit system. Also, the equations for PAC-TIME described in this guide have been
developed for use with SI units, although you can easily switch to another unit system in your tire
property file. Because of the non-dimensional parameters, only a few parameters have to be changed.
However, the parameters in the tire property file must always be valid for the TYDEX W-axis system
(ISO oriented). The basic SI units are listed in the table below.
89Tire Models
SI Units Used in PAC-TIME
Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities at Combined Cornering and Braking/Traction
The longitudinal slip velocity Vsx in the contact point (W-axis system, see Slip Quantities at Combined
Cornering and Braking/Traction) is defined using the longitudinal speed Vx, the wheel rotational
velocity , and the effective rolling radius Re:
Variable type: Name: Abbreviation: Unit:
Angle Slip angle
Inclination angle
Radians
Force Longitudinal force
Lateral force
Vertical load
Fx
Fy
Fz
Newton
Moment Overturning moment
Rolling resistance moment
Self-aligning moment
Mx
My
Mz
Newton.meter
Speed Longitudinal speed
Lateral speed
Longitudinal slip speed
Lateral slip speed
Vx
Vy
Vsx
Vsy
Meters per second
Rotational speed Tire rolling speed Radians per second
α
γ
ω
ω
Adams/Tire
90
(105)
The lateral slip velocity is equal to the lateral speed in the contact point with respect to the road plane:
(106)
The practical slip quantities (longitudinal slip) and (slip angle) are calculated with these slip
velocities in the contact point with:
(107)
(108)
The rolling speed Vr is determined using the effective rolling radius Re:
(109)
Contact Point and Normal Load Calculation• Contact Point
• Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius
Contact Point
In the vertical direction, the tire is modeled as a parallel linear spring and damper having one point of
contact (C) with the road. This is valid for road obstacles with a wavelength larger than the tire radius
(for example, for car tires 1m).
For calculating the kinematics of the tire relative to the road, the road is approximated by its tangent plane
at the road point right below the wheel center (see the figure below).
Contact Point C: Intersection between Road Tangent Plane, Spin Axis Plane, and Wheel Plane
Vsx Vx ΩRe–=
Vsy Vy=
κ α
κVsx
Vx
--------–=
αtanVsy
Vx
---------=
Vr ReΩ=
91Tire Models
The contact point is determined by the line of intersection of the wheel center-plane with the road tangent
(ground) plane and the line of intersection of the wheel center-plane with the plane though the wheel spin
axis.
The normal load Fz of the tire is calculated with:
(110)
where is the tire deflection and is the deflection rate of the tire.
Instead of the linear vertical tire stiffness Cz, you can also define an arbitrary tire deflection - load curve
in the tire property file in the section [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] (see the Example of PAC-TIME
Tire Property File). If a section called [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] exists, the load deflection data
points with a cubic spline for inter- and extrapolation are used for the calculation of the vertical force of
the tire. Note that you must specify Cz in the tire property file, but it does not play any role.
Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius
With the loaded rolling tire radius R defined as the distance of the wheel center to the contact point of
the tire with the road, where is the deflection of the tire, and R0 is the free (unloaded) tire radius, then
the loaded tire radius Rl is:
(111)
In this tire model, a constant (linear) vertical tire stiffness Cz is assumed; therefore, the tire deflection
can be calculated using:
Fz Czρ Kz ρ·⋅+=
ρ ρ
ρ
R1 R0 ρ–=
ρ
Adams/Tire
92
(112)
The effective rolling radius Re (at free rolling of the tire), which is used to calculate the rotational speed
of the tire, is defined by:
(113)
For radial tires, the effective rolling radius is rather independent of load in its load range of operation
because of the high stiffness of the tire belt circumference. Only at low loads does the effective tire radius
decrease with increasing vertical load due to the tire tread thickness. See the figure below.
Effective Rolling Radius and Longitudinal Slip
To represent the effective rolling radius Re, an MF type of equation is used:
(114)
ρFzCz
------=
Re
Vx
Ω------=
Re R0 ρ Fz0 Darc Bρd
( ) Fρd
+tan( )–=
93Tire Models
in which Fz0 is the nominal tire deflection:
(115)
and d is called the dimensionless radial tire deflection, defined by:
(116)
Effective Rolling Radius and Longitudinal Slip
Normal Load and Rolling Radius Parameters
Name:Name Used in Tire Property File: Explanation:
Fz0 FNOMIN Nominal wheel load
Ro UNLOADED_RADIUS Free tire radius
B BREFF Low load stiffness effective rolling radius
D DREFF Peak value of effective rolling radius
ρ
ρ Fz0Fz0Cz
--------=
ρ
ρ d ρρ Fz0---------=
Adams/Tire
94
Basics of the Magic Formula in PAC-TIMEThe Magic Formula is a mathematical formula that is capable of describing the basic tire characteristics
for the interaction forces between the tire and the road under several steady-state operating conditions.
We distinguish:
• Pure cornering slip conditions: cornering with a free rolling tire
• Pure longitudinal slip conditions: braking or driving the tire without cornering
• Combined slip conditions: cornering and longitudinal slip simultaneously
For pure slip conditions, the lateral force Fy as a function of the lateral slip , respectively, and the
longitudinal force Fx as a function of longitudinal slip , have a similar shape. Because of the sine -
arctangent combination, the basic Magic Formula example is capable of describing this shape:
(117)
where Y(x) is either Fx with x the longitudinal slip , or Fy and x the lateral slip .
Characteristic Curves for Fx and Fy Under Pure Slip Conditions
F FREFF High load stiffness effective rolling radius
Cz VERTICAL_STIFFNESS Tire vertical stiffness
Kz VERTICAL_DAMPING Tire vertical damping
Name:Name Used in Tire Property File: Explanation:
α
κ
Y x( ) D Carc Bx E Bx arc Bx( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos=
κ α
95Tire Models
The self-aligning moment Mz is calculated as a product of the lateral force Fy and the pneumatic trail t
added with the residual moment Mzr. In fact, the aligning moment is due to the offset of lateral force Fy,
called pneumatic trail t, from the contact point. Because the pneumatic trail t as a function of the lateral
slip has a cosine shape, a cosine version the Magic Formula is used:
(118)
in which Y(x) is the pneumatic trail t as function of slip angle .
The figure, The Magic Formula and the Meaning of Its Parameters, illustrates the functionality of the B,
C, D, and E factor in the Magic Formula:
• D-factor determines the peak of the characteristic, and is called the peak factor.
• C-factor determines the part used of the sine and, therefore, mainly influences the shape of the
curve (shape factor).
• B-factor stretches the curve and is called the stiffness factor.
• E-factor can modify the characteristic around the peak of the curve (curvature factor).
The Magic Formula and the Meaning of Its Parameters
α
Y x( ) D Carc Bx E Bx arc Bx( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos=
α
Adams/Tire
96
In combined slip conditions, the lateral force Fy will decrease due to longitudinal slip or the opposite, the
longitudinal force Fx will decrease due to lateral slip. The forces and moments in combined slip
conditions are based on the pure slip characteristics multiplied by the so-called weighting functions.
Again, these weighting functions have a cosine-shaped MF examples.
The Magic Formula itself only describes steady-state tire behavior. For transient tire behavior (up to 8
Hz), the MF output is used in a stretched string model that considers tire belt deflections instead of slip
velocities to cope with standstill situations (zero speed).
Inclination Effects in the Lateral Force
From a historical point of view, the camber stiffness always has been modeled implicit in the Magic
Formulas. For deriving coefficients of a Pacejka tire model usually so-called tire tests with slip angle
sweeps at various values of constant load and inclination are performed. In the resulting Force & Moment
measurement data, the effects of camber on the side force Fy are relatively small compared to side force
97Tire Models
effects by slip angle, which can easily result in non-realistic camber stiffness properties. Because there
is no explicit definition of the camber stiffness, the effects on camber stiffness cannot be controlled in
the coefficient optimization process.
The TIME measurement procedure guarantees more realistic tire test data, because they are performed
under realistic tire operating conditions and specific parts of the test program concentrate on getting
accurate cornering and camber stiffness. Because the inputs to the test program (side and longitudinal
slip, inclination, and load) are not independent, for the parameter optimization process, a Pacejka tire
model was required that has a better definition of cornering and camber stiffness from mathematical
point of view (for a more detailed explanation, see [5]).
Therefore, the PAC-TIME tire model has an explicit definition of camber effects, similar to the tire
model for motorcycle tires (PAC_MC). The basic Magic Formula sine function for the lateral force Fy
has been extended with an argument for the inclination as follows:
(119)
In the PAC-TIME tire model, C has been set to ½, and E is not used (zero value). This approach
results in an explicit definition of the camber stiffness, because:
(120)
Input Variables
The input variables to the Magic Formula are:
Input Variables
Output Variables
Its output variables are:
Output Variables.
Longitudinal slip [-]
Slip angle [rad]
Inclination angle [rad]
Normal wheel load Fz [N]
Longitudinal force Fx [N]
Lateral force Fy [N]
γ
Fy0 Dy Cyarc Byα y Ey Byα y arc Byαy( )tan–( )– Cγarc Byαγ Eγ Bγαγ arc Bγαγ( )tan–( )– tan+
tan[]
cos=
γ γ
Kγ BγCγDγ
Fyo
γδ-------- at αγ∂ 0= = =
καγ
Adams/Tire
98
The output variables are defined in the W-axis system of TYDEX.
Basic Tire Parameters
All tire model parameters of the model are without dimension. The reference parameters for the model
are:
Basic Tire Parameters
As a measure for the vertical load, the normalized vertical load increment dfz is used:
(121)
with the possibly adapted nominal load (using the user-scaling factor, Fz0):
(122)
Nomenclature of the Tire Model Parameters
In the subsequent sections, formulas are given with non-dimensional parameters aijk with the following
logic:
Tire Model Parameters
Overturning couple Mx [Nm]
Rolling resistance moment My [Nm]
Aligning moment Mz [Nm]
Nominal (rated) load Fz0 [N]
Unloaded tire radius R0 [m]
Tire belt mass mbelt [kg]
Parameter: Definition:
a = p Force at pure slip
q Moment at pure slip
r Force at combined slip
s Moment at combined slip
dfzFz F'z0–
F'z0--------------------=
λ
F'z0 Fz0 λ Fz0⋅=
99Tire Models
User Scaling Factors
A set of scaling factors is available to easily examine the influence of changing tire properties without
the need to change one of the real Magic Formula coefficients. The default value of these factors is 1.
You can change the factors in the tire property file. The peak friction scaling factors, factors, and
', are also used for the position-dependent friction in 3D Road Contact and Adams/3D Road. An
overview of all scaling factors is shown in the next tables.
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Pure Slip
i = B Stiffness factor
C Shape factor
D Peak value
E Curvature factor
K Slip stiffness = BCD
H Horizontal shift
V Vertical shift
s Moment at combined slip
t Transient tire behavior
j = x Along the longitudinal axis
y Along the lateral axis
z About the vertical axis
k = 1, 2, ...
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
Fzo LFZO Scale factor of nominal (rated) load
Cx LCX Scale factor of Fx shape factor
LMUX Scale factor of Fx peak friction coefficient
Ex LEX Scale factor of Fx curvature factor
Kx LKX Scale factor of Fx slip stiffness
Vx LVX Scale factor of Fx vertical shift
Hx LHX Scale factor of Fx horizontal shift
xx LGAX Scale factor of camber for Fx
Cy LCY Scale factor of Fy shape factor for side slip
y LMUY Scale factor of Fy peak friction coefficient
Parameter: Definition:
λ µξ
λ γψ
λλλ µξλλλλλ γλλ µ
Adams/Tire
100
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Combined Slip
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Transient Response
Steady-State: Magic Formula in PAC-TIME• Steady-State Pure Slip
• Steady-State Combined Slip
EyEy LEY Scale factor of Fy curvature factor
KyKy LKY Scale factor of Fy cornering stiffness
VVy LVY Scale factor of Fy vertical shift
HyHyy LHY Scale factor of Fy horizontal shift
K K LKC Scale factor of camber stiffness (K-factor)
LGAY Scale factor of camber force stiffness
t LTR Scale factor of peak of pneumatic trail
Mr LRES Scale factor for offset of residual torque
z LGAZ Scale factor of camber torque stiffness
Mx LMX Scale factor of overturning couple
VMx LVMX Scale factor of Mx vertical shift
My LMY Scale factor of rolling resistance torque
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
x LXAL Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
y LYKA Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
Vy LVYKA Scale factor of kappa induced Fy
s LS Scale factor of moment arm of Fx
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
LSGKP Scale factor of relaxation length of Fx
LSGAL Scale factor of relaxation length of Fy
gyr LGYR Scale factor of gyroscopic moment
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
λλλλλ γ γλ γψλλλ γλλλ
λ αλ κλ κλ
λ σ κκλ σ ααλ
101Tire Models
Steady-State Pure Slip
• Longitudinal Force at Pure Slip
• Lateral Force at Pure Slip
• Aligning Moment at Pure Slip
Formulas for the Longitudinal Force at Pure Slip
For the tire rolling on a straight line with no slip angle, the formulas are:
(123)
(124)
(125)
(126)
with following coefficients:
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
the longitudinal slip stiffness:
(131)
(132)
(133)
Fx Fx0 κ Fz γ, ,( )=
Fx0 Dx Cxarc Bxκx Ex Bxκx arc Bxκs( )tan–( )– tan[ ] SVx+cos=
κx κ SHx+=
γx γ λ γx⋅=
Cx pCx1 λ cx⋅=
Dx µx Fz⋅=
µx pDx1 pDx2dfz+( ) 1 pDx3 γx2⋅( )γµx–⋅=
Ex pEx1 pEx2dfz pEx2dfz2+ +( ) 1 pEx4 κx( )sgn– λ Ex with Ex 1≤⋅ ⋅=
Kx Fz pKx1 pKx2dfz+( ) pKx3dfz( )λ K
Kx
exp⋅
BxCxDx κx∂
∂ Fx0at κx 0
=
= = =
Bx Kx CxDx( )⁄=
SHx pHx1 pHx2dfz+( )λ Hx=
SVx Fz pVx1 pVx2dfz+( ) λ Vx λ µx⋅ ⋅ ⋅=
Adams/Tire
102
Longitudinal Force Coefficients at Pure Slip
Formulas for the Lateral Force at Pure Slip
(134)
(135)
(136)
The scaled inclination angle:
(137)
with coefficients:
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
The cornering stiffness:
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pCx1 PCX1 Shape factor Cfx for longitudinal force
pDx1 PDX1 Longitudinal friction Mux at Fznom
pDx2 PDX2 Variation of friction Mux with load
pDx3 PDX3 Variation of friction Mux with inclination
pEx1 PEX1 Longitudinal curvature Efx at Fznom
pEx2 PEX2 Variation of curvature Efx with load
pEx3 PEX3 Variation of curvature Efx with load squared
pEx4 PEX4 Factor in curvature Efx while driving
pKx1 PKX1 Longitudinal slip stiffness Kfx/Fz at Fznom
pKx2 PKX2 Variation of slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
Fy Fy0 α γ Fz, ,( )=
Fy0 Dy Cyarc Byαy Ey Byα y arc Byα y( )tan–( )– 1
2---arc Bγγy( )tan+tan SVy+sin=
α y α SHy+=
γy γ λ γy⋅=
Cy pCy1 λ Cy⋅=
Dy µy Fz⋅=
µy pDy1 pDy2dfz+( ) 1 pDy3γy2–( ) λ µy⋅ ⋅=
Ey pEy1 pEy2dfz pEy3 pEy4γy+( ) α y( )sgn+ + λ Ey⋅=
103Tire Models
() (142)
(143)
(144)
(145)
(146)
(147)
Lateral Force Coefficients at Pure Slip
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pCy1 PCY1 Shape factor Cfy for lateral forces
pDy1 PDY1 Lateral friction Muy
pDy2 PDY2 Variation of friction Muy with load
pDy3 PDY3 Variation of friction Muy with squared inclination
pEy1 PEY1 Lateral curvature Efy at Fznom
pEy2 PEY2 Variation of curvature Efy with load
pEy3 PEY3 Inclination dependency of curvature Efy
pEy4 PEY4 Variation of curvature Efy with inclination
pKy1 PKY1 Maximum value of stiffness Kfy/Fznom
pKy2 PKY2 Load at which Kfy reaches maximum value
pKy3 PKY3 Variation of Kfy/Fznom with inclination
pKy4 PKY4 Shape factor of Kfy
pKy5 PKY5 Linear variation of Kg with load
pKy6 PKY6 Quadratic variation of Kg with load
Ky α∂
∂ FypKy1Fz0 pKy4arc
FzpKy2Fz0λ Fz0-------------------------------
tan 1 pKy3γy2–( ) λ Kyλ Fz0⋅ ⋅sin= =
with pKy4 2≤
Kγ γ∂
∂ FyFz pKy5 pKy5dfz+( ) λ Ky⋅= =
By
Ky
CyDy
-------------=
Bγ
2Kγ
Dy
---------=
SHy pHy1 pHy2dfz+( ) λ Hy⋅=
SHy Fz pVy1 pVy2dfz+( ) λ Vyλ µy⋅=
Adams/Tire
104
Formulas for the Aligning Moment at Pure Slip
(148)
with the pneumatic trail t:
(149)
and the residual moment Mzr:
(150)
(151)
(152)
The scaled inclination angle:
(153)
with coefficients:
(154)
(155)
(156)
pHy1 PHY1 Horizontal shift Shy at Fznom
pHy2 PHY2 Variation of shift Shy with load
pVy1 PVY1 Vertical shift in Svy/Fz at Fznom
pVy2 PVY2 Variation of shift Svy/Fz with load
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
M'z Mz0 α γ Fz, ,( )=
Mz0 t Fy0 SVy–( )γ 0=Mzr+⋅–=
t α t( ) Dt Ctarc Btα t Et Btα t arc Btα t( )tan–( )– tan[ ] α( )coscos=
α t α SHt+=
Mzr α r( ) Dr arc Brα r( )tan[ ] α( )coscos=
α r α SHt+=
SHr 0=
γz γ λ γz⋅=
Bt qBz1 qBz2dfz+( ) 1 qBz4γz2 qBz5 γz+ +( ) λ k λ µy⁄⋅( )=
Ct qCz1=
Dt Fz qDz1 qDz2dfz+( ) R0 Fz0⁄( ) λ t⋅=
105Tire Models
(157)
(158)
(159)
(160)
An approximation for the aligning moment stiffness reads:
(161)
and the aligning stiffness for inclination is:
(162)
Aligning Moment Coefficients at Pure Slip
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qBz1 QBZ1 Trail slope factor for trail Bpt at Fznom
qBz2 QBZ2 Variation of slope Bpt with load
qBz4 QBZ4 Variation of slope Bpt with inclination
qBz5 QBZ5 Variation of slope Bpt with absolute inclination
qCz1 QCZ1 Shape factor Cpt for pneumatic trail
qDz1 QDZ1 Peak trail Dpt = Dpt*(Fz/Fznom*R0)
qDz2 QDZ2 Variation of peak Dpt with load
qDz6 QDZ6 Peak residual moment Dmr = Dmr/ (Fz*R0)
qDz7 QDZ7 Variation of peak factor Dmr with load
qDz8 QDZ8 Variation of peak factor Dmr with inclination
qDz9 QDZ9 Variation of Dmr with inclination and load
qEz1 QEZ1 Trail curvature Ept at Fznom
Et qEz1 qEz2dfz+( ) 1 qEz42
π---arc BtCtα t( )tan+
with Et 1≤
=
SHt qHz1 qHz2dfz qHz3 qHz4dfz+( )γz+ +=
Br λ Kz λ µy⁄=
Dr Fz qDz6 qDz7dfz+( )λ r qDz8 qDz9dfz+( )γz+ R0λ µy=
α∂
∂ MztKy– Fz qDz1 qDz2dfz+( ) R0 Fz0⁄( ) pKy5 pKy6dfz+( )Fz λ tλ Ky⋅= =
γd
dMzqDz8 qDz9dfz+( )R0Fzλ µy=
Adams/Tire
106
Steady-State Combined Slip
PAC-TIME has two methods for calculating the combined slip forces and moments. If the user supplies
the coefficients for the combined slip cosine 'weighing' functions, the combined slip is calculated
according to Combined slip with cosine 'weighing' functions (standard method). If no coefficients are
supplied, the so-called friction ellipse is used to estimate the combined slip forces and moments, see
section Combined Slip with friction ellipse
Combined slip with cosine 'weighing' functions
• Longitudinal Force at Combined Slip
• Lateral Force at Combined Slip
• Aligning Moment at Combined Slip
• Overturning Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
• Rolling Resistance Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
Formulas for the Longitudinal Force at Combined Slip
(163)
with Gx the weighting function of the longitudinal force for pure slip.
We write:
(164)
(165)
with coefficients:
(166)
(167)
qEz2 QEZ2 Variation of curvature Ept with load
qEz4 QEZ4 Variation of curvature Ept with sign of Alpha-t
qHz1 QHZ1 Trail horizontal shift Sht at Fznom
qHz2 QHZ2 Variation of shift Sht with load
qHz3 QHZ3 Variation of shift Sht with inclination
qHz4 QHZ4 Variation of shift Sht with inclination and load
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
Fx Fx0 Gxα α κ Fz, ,( )⋅=
α
Fx Dxα Cxαarc Bxαα s Exα Bxαα s arc Bxαα s( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos=
α s α SHxα+=
Bxα rBx1 arc rBx2κ tan[ ] λ xα⋅cos=
Cxα rCx1=
107Tire Models
(168)
(169)
(170)
The weighting function follows as:
(171)
Longitudinal Force Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Lateral Force at Combined Slip
(172)
with Gyk the weighting function for the lateral force at pure slip and SVyk the ' -induced' side force;
therefore, the lateral force can be written as:
(173)
(174)
with the coefficients:
(175)
(176)
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
rBx1 RBX1 Slope factor for combined slip Fx reduction
rBx2 RBX2 Variation of slope Fx reduction with kappa
rCx1 RCX1 Shape factor for combined slip Fx reduction
rEx1 REX1 Curvature factor of combined Fx
rEx2 REX2 Curvature factor of combined Fx with load
rHx1 RHX1 Shift factor for combined slip Fx reduction
Dxα
FxoCxαarc BxαSHxα Exα BxαSHxα arc BxαSHxα( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Exα rEx1 rEx2dfz with Exα 1≤+=
SHxα rHx1=
Gxα
Cxαarc Bxαα s Exα Bxαα s arc Bxαα s( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
Cxαarc BxαSHxα Exα BxαSHxα arc BxαSHxα( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Fy Fy0 Gyκ α κ γ Fz, , ,( ) SVyκ+⋅=
κ
Fy Dyκ Cyκarc Byκκ s Eyκ Bxακs arc Byκκs( )tan–( )– tan[ ] SVyκ+cos=
κ s κ SHyκ+=
Byκ rBy1 arc rBy2 α rBy3–( ) tan[ ] λ yκ⋅cos=
Cyκ rCy1=
Adams/Tire
108
(177)
(178)
(179)
(180)
The weighting function appears is defined as:
(181)
Lateral Force Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Aligning Moment at Combined Slip
(182)
with:
(183)
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
rBy1 RBY1 Slope factor for combined Fy reduction
rBy2 RBY2 Variation of slope Fy reduction with alpha
rBy3 RBY3 Shift term for alpha in slope Fy reduction
rCy1 RCY1 Shape factor for combined Fy reduction
rEy1 REY1 Curvature factor of combined Fy
rEy2 REY2 Curvature factor of combined Fy with load
rHy1 RHY1 Shift factor for combined Fy reduction
rHy2 RHY2 Shift factor for combined Fy reduction with load
rVy1 RVY1 Kappa induced side force SVyk/my·Fz at Fznom
rVy2 RVY2 Variation of SVyk/my·Fz with load
rVy3 RVY3 Variation of SVyk/my·Fz with inclination
rVy4 RVY4 Variation of SVyk/my·Fz with a
rVy5 RVY5 Variation of SVyk/my·Fz with k
rVy6 RVY6 Variation of SVyk/my·Fz with atan(k)
Dyκ
FyoCyκarc ByκSHyκ Eyκ BxαSHyκ arc ByκSHyκ( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Eyκ rEy1 rEy2dfz with Eyκ 1≤+=
SHyκ rHy1 rHy2dfz+=
DVyκ µyFz rVy1 rVy2dfz rVy3γ+ +( ) arc rVy4α( )tan[ ]cos⋅ ⋅=
Gyκ
Cyκarc Byκκs Eyκ Bxακs arc Byκκs( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
Cyκarc ByκSHyκ Eyκ BxαSHyκ arc ByκSHyκ( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
M'z t F'y Mzr s Fx⋅+ +⋅–=
t t α t eq,( )=
109Tire Models
(184)
(185)
(186)
with the arguments:
(187)
(188)
Aligning Moment Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Overturning Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
For the overturning moment, the formula reads both for pure and combined slip situations:
(189)
Overturning Moment Coefficients
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
ssz1 SSZ1 Nominal value of s/R0 effect of Fx on Mz
ssz2 SSZ2 Variation of distance s/R0 with Fy/Fznom
ssz3 SSZ3 Variation of distance s/R0 with inclination
ssz4 SSZ4 Variation of distance s/R0 with load and inclination
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qsx1 QSX1 Lateral force induced overturning couple
qsx2 QSX2 Inclination induced overturning couple
qsx3 QSX3 Fy induced overturning couple
Dt Ctarc Btα t eq, Et Btα t eq, arc Btα t eq,( )tan–( )– tan[ ] α( )coscos=
F'y γ, 0= Fy SVyκ–=
Mzr Mzr α r eq,( ) Dr arc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ] α( )coscos= =
t t α t eq,( )=
α t eq, arc α2
t
Kx
Ky
------
2
κ2 α t( )sgn⋅+tantan=
α r eq, arc α2
r
Kx
Ky
------
2
κ2 α r( )sgn⋅+tantan=
Mx Ro Fz qsx1λ VMx qsx2 qsx3FyFz0--------⋅+–
λ Mx⋅ ⋅=
Adams/Tire
110
Formulas for Rolling Resistance Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
The rolling resistance moment is defined by:
(190)
Rolling Resistance Coefficients
Combined Slip with friction ellipse
In case the tire property file does not contain the coefficients for the 'standard' combined slip method
(cosine 'weighing functions), the friction ellipse method is used, as described in this section. Note that
the method employed here is not part of one of the Magic Formula publications by Pacejka, but is an in-
house development of MSC.Software.
The following friction coefficients are defined:
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qsy1 QSY1 Rolling resistance moment coefficient
qsy2 QSY2 Rolling resistance moment depending on Fx
qsy3 QSY3 Rolling resistance moment depending on speed
qsy4 QSY4 Rolling resistance moment depending on speed^4
Vref LONGVL Measurement speed
My Ro Fz qSy1 qSy2Fx Fz0⁄ qSy3 Vx Vref( )⁄ qSy4 Vx Vref⁄( )4+ + ⋅ ⋅=
κc κ SHxSVx
Kx
---------+ +=
α c α SHySVyKy
---------+ +=
α∗ α c( )sin=
βκc
κc2
α∗ 2+
-------------------------
acos=
µx act,
Fx 0, SVx–
Fz-------------------------= µy act,
Fy 0, SVy–
Fz-------------------------=
µx max,
Dx
Fz------= µy max,
Dy
Fz------=
111Tire Models
The forces corrected for the combined slip conditions are:
For aligning moment Mx, rolling resistance My and aligning moment Mz the formulae (76) until and
including (84) are used with =0.
Transient Behavior in PAC-TIMEThe previous Magic Formula equations are valid for steady-state tire behavior. When driving, however,
the tire requires some response time on changes of the inputs. In tire modeling terminology, the low-
frequency behavior (up to 8 Hz) is called transient behavior.
For accurate transient tire behavior, you can use the stretched string tire model (see reference [1]). The
tire belt is modeled as stretched string, which is supported to the rim with lateral (and longitudinal)
springs. Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior shows a top-view of the string model. When
rolling, the first point having contact with the road adheres to the road (no sliding assumed). Therefore,
a lateral deflection of the string arises that depends on the slip angle size and the history of the lateral
deflection of previous points having contact with the road.
Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior
µx1
1
µx act,-------------
2 βtan
µy max,----------------
2+
---------------------------------------------------------=
µyβtan
1
µx max,----------------
2 βtan
µy act,-------------
2+
---------------------------------------------------------=
Fxµx
µx act,-------------Fx 0,= Fy
µy
µy act,-------------Fy 0,=
SVyκ
Adams/Tire
112
For calculating the lateral deflection v1 of the string in the first point of contact with the road, the
following differential equation is valid:
(191)
with the relaxation length in the lateral direction. The turnslip can be neglected at radii larger
than 10 m. This differential equation cannot be used at zero speed, but when multiplying with Vx, the
equation can be transformed to:
(192)
When the tire is rolling, the lateral deflection depends on the lateral slip speed; at standstill, the deflection
depends on the relaxation length, which is a measure for the lateral stiffness of the tire. Therefore, with
this approach, the tire is responding to a slip speed when rolling and behaving like a spring at standstill.
A similar approach yields the following for the deflection of the string in longitudinal direction:
1
Vx
------td
dv1 v1σ α------+ α( ) aφ+tan=
σ α φ
σ α td
dv1Vx v1+ σ αVsy=
113Tire Models
(193)
Both the longitudinal and lateral relaxation length are defined as of the vertical load:
(194)
(195)
Now the practical slip quantities, and , are defined based on the tire deformation:
(196)
(197)
Using these practical slip quantities, and , the Magic Formula equations can be used to calculate
the tire-road interaction forces and moments:
(198)
(199)
(200)
Gyroscopic Couple in PAC-TIMEWhen having fast rotations about the vertical axis in the wheel plane, the inertia of the tire belt may lead
to gyroscopic effects. To cope with this additional moment, the following contribution is added to the
total aligning moment:
(201)
with the parameters (in addition to the basic tire parameter mbelt):
(202)
and:
σ x td
du1Vx u1+ σ xVsx–=
σ x Fz pTx1 pTx2dfz+( ) pTx3dfz( ) R0 Fz0⁄( )λ σ κ⋅exp⋅ ⋅=
σ α pTy1Fz0 pKy4arcFz
pTy2Fz0λ Fz0-----------------------------
tan 1 pKy3γ2–( ) R0λ Fz0λ σ α⋅ ⋅sin=
κ' α '
κ'u1σ x
------ Vx( )sin=
α 'v1
σ α------
atan=
κ' α '
Fx Fx α ' κ' Fz, ,( )=
Fy Fy α ' κ' γ Fz, , ,( )=
Mz Mz α ' κ' γ Fz, , ,( )=
Mz gyr, cgyrmbeltVr1 td
dvarc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ]cos=
cgyr qTz1 λ gyr⋅=
Adams/Tire
114
(203)
The total aligning moment now becomes:
Coefficients and Transient Response
Left and Right Side TiresIn general, a tire produces a lateral force and aligning moment at zero slip angle due to the tire
construction, known as conicity and plysteer. In addition, the tire characteristics cannot be symmetric for
positive and negative slip angles.
A tire property file with the parameters for the model results from testing with a tire that is mounted in a
tire test bench comparable either to the left or the right side of a vehicle. If these coefficients are used for
both the left and the right side of the vehicle model, the vehicle does not drive straight at zero steering
wheel angle.
The latest versions of tire property files contain a keyword TYRESIDE in the [MODEL] section that
indicates for which side of the vehicle the tire parameters in that file are valid (TIRESIDE = 'LEFT' or
TIRESIDE = 'RIGHT').
If this keyword is available, Adams/Car corrects for the conicity, plysteer, and asymmetry when using a
tire property file on the opposite side of the vehicle. In fact, the tire characteristics are mirrored with
respect to slip angle zero. In Adams/View, this option can only be used when the tire is generated by the
graphical user interface: select Build -> Forces -> Special Force: Tire, as shown in the figure below.
Create Wheel and Tire Dialog Box in Adams/View
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pTx1 PTX1 Longitudinal relaxation length at Fznom
pTx2 PTX2 Variation of longitudinal relaxation length with load
pTx3 PTX3 Variation of longitudinal relaxation length with exponent
of load
pTy1 PTY1 Peak value of relaxation length for lateral direction
pTy2 PTY2 Shape factor for lateral relaxation length
qTz1 QTZ1 Gyroscopic moment constant
Mbelt MBELT Belt mass of the wheel
arc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ]cos 1=
Mz Mz' Mz gyr,+=
115Tire Models
Next to the LEFT and RIGHT side option of TYRESIDE, you can also set SYMMETRIC: then the tire
characteristics are modified during initialization to show symmetric performance for left and right side
corners and zero conicity and plysteer (no offsets). Also, when you set the tire property file to
SYMMETRIC, the tire characteristics are changed to symmetric behavior.
USE_MODES of PAC-TIME: from Simple to ComplexThe parameter USE_MODE in the tire property file allows you to switch the output of the PAC-TIME
tire model from very simple (that is, steady-state cornering) to complex (transient combined cornering
and braking).
Adams/Tire
116
The options for the USE_MODE and the output of the model have been listed in the table below.
USE_MODE Values of PAC-TIME and Related Tire Model Output
Quality Checks for the Tire Model ParametersBecause PAC-TIME uses an empirical approach to describe tire - road interaction forces, incorrect
parameters can easily result in non-realistic tire behavior. Below is a list of the most important items to
ensure the quality of the parameters in a tire property file:
• Rolling Resistance
• Camber (Inclination) Effects
• Validity Range of the Tire Model Input
Rolling Resistance
For a realistic rolling resistance, the parameter qsy1 must be positive. For car tires, it can be in the order
of 0.006 - 0.01 (0.6% - 1.0%).
$---------------------------------------------------rolling resistance[ROLLING_COEFFICIENTS]QSY1 = 0.01QSY2 = 0QSY3 = 0
USE_MODE: State: Slip conditions:PAC-TIME output
(forces and moments):
0 Steady state Acts as a vertical spring and
damper
0, 0, Fz, 0, 0, 0
1 Steady state Pure longitudinal slip Fx, 0, Fz, 0, My, 0
2 Steady state Pure lateral (cornering) slip 0, Fy, Fz, Mx, 0, Mz
3 Steady state Longitudinal and lateral (not
combined)
Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
4 Steady state Combined slip Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
11 Transient Pure longitudinal slip Fx, 0, Fz, 0, My, 0
12 Transient Pure lateral (cornering) slip 0, Fy, Fz, Mx, 0, Mz
13 Transient Longitudinal and lateral (not
combined)
Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
14 Transient Combined slip Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz
Note: Do not change Fz0 (FNOMIN) and R0 (UNLOADED_RADIUS) in your tire property file.
It will change the complete tire characteristics because these two parameters are used to
make all parameters without dimension.
117Tire Models
QSY4 = 0
Camber (Inclination) Effects
Camber stiffness has been explicitly defined in PAC-TIME, so camber stiffness can be easily checked
by the tire model parameters itself, see the table, Checklist for PAC-TIME Parameters and Properties,
below. For car tires, positive inclination should result in a negative lateral force at zero slip angle (see
Effect of Positive Camber on the Lateral Force in TYDEX W-axis (ISO) System below). If positive
inclination results in an increase of the lateral force, the coefficient may not be valid for the ISO, but for
the SAE coordinate system. Note that PAC-TIME only uses coefficients for the TYDEX W-axis (ISO)
system.
Effect of Positive Camber on the Lateral Force in TYDEX W-axis (ISO) System
The following table lists further checks on the PAC-TIME parameters.
Checklist for PAC-TIME Parameters and Properties
Parameter/property: Requirement: Explanation:
LONGVL 1 m/s Reference velocity at which parameters are measured
VXLOW Approximately 1 m/s Threshold for scaling down forces and moments
Dx > 0 Peak friction (see equation (22))
Adams/Tire
118
Validity Range of the Tire Model Input
In the tire property file, a range of the input variables has been given in which the tire properties are
supposed to be valid. These validity range parameters are (the listed values can be different):
$------------------------------------------------------long_slip_range[LONG_SLIP_RANGE]KPUMIN
= -1.5 $Minimum valid wheel slip
KPUMAX = 1.5
$Maximum valid wheel slip$-----------------------------------------------------slip_angle_range[SLIP_ANGLE_RANGE]ALPMIN
= -1.5708 $Minimum valid slip angle
ALPMAX = 1.5708 $Maximum valid slip angle
$-----------------------------------------------inclination_slip_range[INCLINATION_ANGLE_RANGE]CAMMIN
= -0.26181 $Minimum valid camber angle
CAMMAX = 0.26181 $Maximum valid camber angle
$-------------------------------------------------vertical_force_range[VERTICAL_FORCE_RANGE]FZMIN
= 225 $Minimum allowed wheel load
FZMAX = 10125
pDx1/pDx2 < 0 Peak friction Fx must decrease with increasing load
Kx > 0 Long slip stiffness (see equation (25))
Dy > 0 Peak friction (see equation (34))
pDy1/pDy2 < 0 Peak friction Fx must decrease with increasing load
Ky < 0 Cornering stiffness (see equation (37a))
Kg < 0 Camber stiffness (see equation (37b))
qsy1 > 0 Rolling resistance, in the range of 0.005 - 0.015
Parameter/property: Requirement: Explanation:
119Tire Models
$Maximum allowed wheel load
If one of the input parameters exceeds a minimum or maximum validity value, the calculation in the tire
model is performed with the minimum or maximum value of this range to avoid non-realistic tire
behavior. In that case, a message appears warning you that one of the inputs exceeds a validity value.
Standard Tire Interface (STI) for PAC-TIMEBecause all Adams products use the Standard Tire Interface (STI) for linking the tire models to
Adams/Solver, below is a brief background of the STI history (see reference [4]).
At the First International Colloquium on Tire Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis on October 21-22,
1991, the International Tire Workshop working group was established (TYDEX).
The working group concentrated on tire measurements and tire models used for vehicle simulation
purposes. For most vehicle dynamics studies, people previously developed their own tire models.
Because all car manufacturers and their tire suppliers have the same goal (that is, development of tires
to improve dynamic safety of the vehicle), it aimed for standardization in the tire behavior description.
In TYDEX, two expert groups, consisting of participants of vehicle industry (passenger cars and trucks),
tire manufacturers, other suppliers and research laboratories, had been defined with following goals:
• The first expert group's (Tire Measurements - Tire Modeling) main goal was to specify an
interface between tire measurements and tire models. The result was the TYDEX-Format [2] to
describe tire measurement data.
• The second expert group's (Tire Modeling - Vehicle Modeling) main goal was to specify an
interface between tire models and simulation tools, which resulted in the Standard Tire Interface
(STI) [3]. The use of this interface should ensure that a wide range of simulation software can be
linked to a wide range of tire modeling software.
Definitions• General
• Tire Kinematics
• Slip Quantities
• Force and Moments
Adams/Tire
120
General
General Definitions
Tire Kinematics
Tire Kinematics Definitions
Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities Definitions
Term: Definition:
Road tangent plane Plane with the normal unit vector (tangent to the road) in the tire-road contact
point C.
C-axis system Coordinate system mounted on the wheel carrier at the wheel center according to
TYDEX, ISO orientation.
Wheel plane The plane in the wheel center that is formed by the wheel when considered a rigid
disc with zero width.
Contact point C Contact point between tire and road, defined as the intersection of the wheel
plane and the projection of the wheel axis onto the road plane.
W-axis system Coordinate system at the tire contact point C, according to TYDEX, ISO
orientation.
Parameter: Definition: Units:
R0 Unloaded tire radius [m]
R Loaded tire radius [m]
Re Effective tire radius [m]
Radial tire deflection [m]
d Dimensionless radial tire deflection [-]
Fz0 Radial tire deflection at nominal load [m]
mbelt Tire belt mass [kg]
Rotational velocity of the wheel [rads-1]
Parameter: Definition: Units:
V Vehicle speed [ms-1]
Vsx Slip speed in x direction [ms-1]
Vsy Slip speed in y direction [ms-1]
Vs Resulting slip speed [ms-1]
Vx Rolling speed in x direction [ms-1]
ρρρ
ω
121Tire Models
Forces and Moments
Force and Moment Definitions
References1. H.B. Pacejka, Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics, 2002, Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 0 7506 5141 5.
2. H.-J. Unrau, J. Zamow, TYDEX-Format, Description and Reference Manual, Release 1.1,
Initiated by the International Tire Working Group, July 1995.
3. A. Riedel, Standard Tire Interface, Release 1.2, Initiated by the Tire Workgroup, June 1995.
4. J.J.M. van Oosten, H.-J. Unrau, G. Riedel, E. Bakker, TYDEX Workshop: Standardisation of
Data Exchange in Tyre Testing and Tyre Modelling, Proceedings of the 2nd International
Colloquium on Tyre Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis, Vehicle System Dynamics, Volume
27, Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam/Lisse, 1996.
5. J.J.M. van Oosten, E. Kuiper, G. Leister, D. Bode, H. Schindler, J. Tischleder, S. Köhne,A new
tyre model for TIME measurement data,Tire Technology Expo 2003, Hannover.
Example of PAC-TIME Tire Property File[MDI_HEADER]FILE_TYPE
='tir'
Vy Lateral speed of tire contact center [ms-1]
Vr Linear speed of rolling [ms-1]
Longitudinal slip [-]
Slip angle [rad]
Inclination angle [rad]
Abbreviation: Definition: Units:
Fz Vertical wheel load [N]
Fz0 Nominal load [N]
dfz Dimensionless vertical load [-]
Fx Longitudinal force [N]
Fy Lateral force [N]
Mx Overturning moment [Nm]
My Braking/driving moment [Nm]
Mz Aligning moment [Nm]
Parameter: Definition: Units:
καγ
Adams/Tire
122
FILE_VERSION =3.0
FILE_FORMAT ='ASCII'
! : TIRE_VERSION : PAC-TIME
! : COMMENT : Tire
205/55 R16 90H ! : COMMENT :
Manufacturer Continental
! : COMMENT : Nom. section with
(m) 0.205
! : COMMENT : Nom. aspect ratio
(-) 55
! : COMMENT : Infl. pressure
(Pa) 250000
! : COMMENT : Rim radius
(m) 0.2032
! : COMMENT : Measurement ID
! : COMMENT : Test speed
(m/s) 11.11
! : COMMENT : Road surface
! : COMMENT : Road condition
! : FILE_FORMAT : ASCII
! : Copyright MSC.Software, Thu Oct 14 13:52:26 2004!! USE_MODE specifies the type of calculation performed:! 0: Fz only, no Magic Formula evaluation! 1: Fx,My only! 2: Fy,Mx,Mz only! 3: Fx,Fy,Mx,My,Mz uncombined force/moment calculation! 4: Fx,Fy,Mx,My,Mz combined force/moment calculation
123Tire Models
! +10: including relaxation behaviour! *-1: mirroring of tyre characteristics!! example: USE_MODE = -12 implies:! -calculation of Fy,Mx,Mz only! -including relaxation effects! -mirrored tyre characteristics!$----------------------------------------------------------------units[UNITS]LENGTH
='meter'FORCE
='newton'ANGLE
='radians'MASS
='kg'TIME
='second'$----------------------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT
='PAC-TIME'USE_MODE
= 14 $Tyre use switch (IUSED)
VXLOW = 2
LONGVL = 30 $Measurement speed
TYRESIDE = 'LEFT'
$Mounted side of tyre at vehicle/test bench$-----------------------------------------------------------dimensions[DIMENSION]UNLOADED_RADIUS
= 0.317 $Free tyre radius
WIDTH = 0.205
$Nominal section width of the tyre ASPECT_RATIO
= 0.55 $Nominal aspect ratio
RIM_RADIUS = 0.203
Adams/Tire
124
$Nominal rim radius
RIM_WIDTH = 0.165 $Rim width
$----------------------------------------------------------------shape[SHAPE]radial width1.0
0.0 1.0
0.4 1.0
0.9 0.9
1.0$-----------------------------------------------------------load_curve$ For a non-linear tire vertical stiffness (optional)$ Maximum of 100 points[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen
fz0.000
0.00.001
212.00.002
428.00.003
648.00.005
1100.00.010
2300.00.020
5000.00.030
8100.0$------------------------------------------------------------parameter[VERTICAL]VERTICAL_STIFFNESS
= 2.648e+005 $Tyre vertical stiffness
VERTICAL_DAMPING = 500
$Tyre vertical damping
BREFF = 4.90
125Tire Models
$Low load stiffness e.r.r.
DREFF = 0.41
$Peak value of e.r.r.
FREFF = 0.09
$High load stiffness e.r.r.
FNOMIN = 4704
$Nominal wheel load$------------------------------------------------------long_slip_range[LONG_SLIP_RANGE]KPUMIN
= -1.5 $Minimum valid wheel slip
KPUMAX = 1.5
$Maximum valid wheel slip
$-----------------------------------------------------slip_angle_range[SLIP_ANGLE_RANGE]ALPMIN
= -1.5708 $Minimum valid slip angle
ALPMAX = 1.5708
$Maximum valid slip angle
$-----------------------------------------------inclination_slip_range[INCLINATION_ANGLE_RANGE]CAMMIN
= -0.26181 $Minimum valid camber angle
CAMMAX = 0.26181
$Maximum valid camber angle
$-------------------------------------------------vertical_force_range[VERTICAL_FORCE_RANGE]FZMIN
= 140 $Minimum allowed wheel load
Adams/Tire
126
FZMAX = 10800
$Maximum allowed wheel load
$--------------------------------------------------------------scaling[SCALING_COEFFICIENTS]LFZO
= 1 $Scale factor of nominal load
LCX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx shape factor
LMUX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx peak friction coefficient
LEX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx curvature factor
LKX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx slip stiffness
LHX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx horizontal shift
LVX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx vertical shift
LGAX = 1
$Scale factor of camber for Fx
LCY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy shape factor
LMUY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy peak friction coefficient
LEY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy curvature factor
LKY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy cornering stiffness
127Tire Models
LHY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy horizontal shift
LVY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy vertical shift
LGAY = 1
$Scale factor of camber for Fy
LKC = 1
$Scale factor of camber stiffness
LTR = 1
$Scale factor of Peak of pneumatic trail
LRES = 1
$Scale factor of Peak of residual torque
LGAZ = 1
$Scale factor of camber torque stiffness
LXAL = 1
$Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
LYKA = 1
$Scale factor of kappa influence on Fy
LVYKA = 1 $Scale factor of kappa induced Fy
LS = 1
$Scale factor of Moment arm of Fx
LSGKP = 1 $Scale factor of Relaxation length of Fx
LSGAL = 1 $Scale factor of Relaxation length of Fy
LGYR
Adams/Tire
128
= 1 $Scale factor of gyroscopic torque
LMX = 1
$Scale factor of overturning couple
LVMX = 1
$Scale factor of Mx vertical shift
LMY = 1
$Scale factor of rolling resistance torque
$---------------------------------------------------------longitudinal[LONGITUDINAL_COEFFICIENTS]PCX1
= 1.3178 $Shape factor Cfx for longitudinal force
PDX1 = 1.0455
$Longitudinal friction Mux at Fznom
PDX2 = 0.063954
$Variation of friction Mux with load
PDX3 = 0
$Variation of friction Mux with camber
PEX1 = 0.15798
$Longitudinal curvature Efx at Fznom
PEX2 = 0.41141
$Variation of curvature Efx with load
PEX3 = 0.1487
$Variation of curvature Efx with load squared
PEX4 = 3.0004
$Factor in curvature Efx while driving
PKX1 = 23.181
$Longitudinal slip stiffness Kfx/Fz at Fznom
129Tire Models
PKX2 = -0.037391
$Variation of slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
PKX3 = 0.80348
$Exponent in slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
PHX1 = -0.00058264
$Horizontal shift Shx at Fznom
PHX2 = -0.0037992
$Variation of shift Shx with load
PVX1 = 0.045118
$Vertical shift Svx/Fz at Fznom
PVX2 = 0.058244
$Variation of shift Svx/Fz with load
RBX1 = 13.276
$Slope factor for combined slip Fx reduction
RBX2 = -13.778
$Variation of slope Fx reduction with kappa
RCX1 = 1.0
$Shape factor for combined slip Fx reduction
REX1 = 0
$Curvature factor of combined Fx
REX2 = 0
$Curvature factor of combined Fx with load
RHX1 = 0
$Shift factor for combined slip Fx reduction
PTX1 = 0.85683
$Relaxation length SigKap0/Fz at Fznom
PTX2 = 0.00011176
Adams/Tire
130
$Variation of SigKap0/Fz with load
PTX3 = -1.3131
$Variation of SigKap0/Fz with exponent of load
$----------------------------------------------------------overturning[OVERTURNING_COEFFICIENTS]QSX1
= 0 $Lateral force induced overturning moment
QSX2 = 0
$Camber induced overturning moment
QSX3 = 0
$Fy induced overturning moment
$--------------------------------------------------------------lateral[LATERAL_COEFFICIENTS]PCY1
= 1.18 $Shape factor Cfy for lateral forces
PDY1 = 0.90312
$Lateral friction Muy
PDY2 = -0.17023
$Exponent lateral friction Muy
PDY3 = -0.76512
$Variation of friction Muy with squared camber
PEY1 = -0.57264
$Lateral curvature Efy at Fznom
PEY2 = -0.13945
$Variation of curvature Efy with load
PEY3 = 0.030873
$Zero order camber dependency of curvature Efy
PEY4 = 0
$Variation of curvature Efy with camber
131Tire Models
PKY1 = -25.128
$Maximum value of stiffness Kfy/Fznom
PKY2 = 3.2018
$Load with peak of cornering stiffness
PKY3 = 0
$Variation with camber squared of cornering stiffness
PKY4 = 1.9998
$Shape factor for cornering stiffness with load
PKY5 = -0.50726
$Camber stiffness/Fznom
PKY6 = 0
$Camber stiffness depending on Fz squared
PHY1 = 0.0031414
$Horizontal shift Shy at Fznom
PHY2 = 0
$Variation of shift Shy with load
PVY1 = 0.0068801
$Vertical shift in Svy/Fz at Fznom
PVY2 = -0.0051
$Variation of shift Shv with load
RBY1 = 7.1433
$Slope factor for combined Fy reduction
RBY2 = 9.1916
$Variation of slope Fy reduction with alpha
RBY3 = -0.027856
$Shift term for alpha in slope Fy reduction
Adams/Tire
132
RCY1 = 1.0
$Shape factor for combined Fy reduction
REY1 = 0
$Curvature factor of combined Fy
REY2 = 0
$Curvature factor of combined Fy with load
RHY1 = 0
$Shift factor for combined Fy reduction
RHY2 = 0
$Shift factor for combined Fy reduction with load
RVY1 = 0
$Kappa induced side force Svyk/Muy*Fz at Fznom
RVY2 = 0
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with load
RVY3 = 0
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with camber
RVY4 = 0
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with alpha
RVY5 = 0
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with kappa
RVY6 = 0
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with atan(kappa)
PTY1 = 4.1114
$Peak value of relaxation length SigAlp0/R0
PTY2 = 6.1149
$Value of Fz/Fznom where SigAlp0 is extreme
$---------------------------------------------------rolling resistance
133Tire Models
[ROLLING_COEFFICIENTS]QSY1
= 0.01 $Rolling resistance torque coefficient
QSY2 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on Fx
QSY3 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on speed
QSY4 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on speed^4
$-------------------------------------------------------------aligning[ALIGNING_COEFFICIENTS]QBZ1
= 5.6241 $Trail slope factor for trail Bpt at Fznom
QBZ2 = -2.2687
$Variation of slope Bpt with load
QBZ4 = 6.891
$Variation of slope Bpt with camber
QBZ5 = -0.35587
$Variation of slope Bpt with absolute camber
QCZ1 = 1.0904
$Shape factor Cpt for pneumatic trail
QDZ1 = 0.082871
$Peak trail Dpt = Dpt*(Fz/Fznom*R0)
QDZ2 = -0.012677
$Variation of peak Dpt with load
QDZ6 = 0.00038069
$Peak residual torque Dmr = Dmr/(Fz*R0)
QDZ7 = 0.00075331
Adams/Tire
134
$Variation of peak factor Dmr with load
QDZ8 = -0.083385
$Variation of peak factor Dmr with camber
QDZ9 = 0
$Variation of peak factor Dmr with camber and load
QEZ1 = -34.759
$Trail curvature Ept at Fznom
QEZ2 = -37.828
$Variation of curvature Ept with load
QEZ4 = 0.59942
$Variation of curvature Ept with sign of Alpha-t
QHZ1 = 0.0025743
$Trail horizontal shift Sht at Fznom
QHZ2 = -0.0012175
$Variation of shift Sht with load
QHZ3 = 0.038299
$Variation of shift Sht with camber
QHZ4 = 0.044776
$Variation of shift Sht with camber and load
SSZ1 = 0.0097546
$Nominal value of s/R0: effect of Fx on Mz
SSZ2 = 0.0043624
$Variation of distance s/R0 with Fy/Fznom
SSZ3 = 0
$Variation of distance s/R0 with camber
SSZ4 = 0
$Variation of distance s/R0 with load and camber
135Tire Models
QTZ1 = 0
$Gyroscopic torque constant
MBELT = 0 $Belt mass of the wheel -kg-
Contact MethodsThe PAC-TIME model supports the following roads:
• 2D Roads, see Using the 2D Road Model
• 3D Roads, see Adams/3D Road Model
Note that the PAC-TIME model has only one point of contact with the road; therefore, the wavelength
of road obstacles must be longer than the tire radius for realistic output of the model. In addition, the
contact force computed by this tire model is normal to the road plane. Therefore, the contact point does
not generate a longitudinal force when rolling over a short obstacle, such as a cleat or pothole.
For ride and comfort analyses, we recommend more sophisticated tire models, such as Ftire.
Adams/Tire
136
Using Pacejka '89 and '94 ModelsAdams/Tire provides you with the handling force models, Pacejka '89 and Pacejka '94.
• About Pacejka '89 and '94
• Using Pacejka '89 Handling Force Model
• Using Pacejka '94 Handling Force Model
• Combined Slip
• Left and Right Side Tires
• Contact Methods
About Pacejka '89 and '94
The Pacejka '89 and '94 handling models are special versions of the Magic-Formula Tyre model as cited
in the following publications:
• Pacejka '89 - H.B Pacejka, E. Bakker, and L. Lidner. A New Tire Model with an Application in
Vehicle Dynamics Studies, SAE paper 890087, 1989.
• Pacejka '94 - H.B Pacejka and E. Bakker. The Magic Formula Tyre Model. Proceedings of the
1st International Colloquium on Tyre Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis, Swets &
Zeitlinger B.V., Amsterdam/Lisse, 1993.
PAC2002 is technically superior, continuously kept up to date with latest Magic Formula developments,
and MSC’s recommended handling model. However, because many Adams/Tire users have pre-existing
tire data or new data from tire suppliers and testing organizations in a format that is compatible with the
Pacejka '89 and '94 models, the Adams/Tire Handling module includes these models in addition to the
PAC2002.
The material in this help is intended to illustrate only the formulas used in the Pacejka '89 and '94 tire
models. For general information on the PAC2002 and the Magic Formula method, see the papers cited
above or the PAC2002 help.
• History of the Pacejka Name in Adams/Tire
• About Coordinate Systems
• Normal Force
History of the Pacejka Name in Adams/Tire
The formulas used in the Pacejka '89 and '94 tire models are derived from publications by Dr. H.B.
Pacejka, and are commonly referred to as the Pacejka method in the automotive industry. Dr. Pacejka
himself is not personally associated with the development of these tire models, nor does he endorse them
in any way.
About Coordinate Systems
The coordinate systems used in tire modeling and measurement are sometimes confusing. The coordinate
systems employed in the Pacejka ’89 and ’94 tire models are no exception. They are derived from the
tire-measurement systems that the majority of Adams/Tire customers were using at the time when the
models were originally developed.
137Tire Models
The Pacejka '89 and '94 tire models were developed before the implementation of the TYDEX STI. As
a result, Pacejka ’89 conforms to a modified SAE-based tire coordinate system and sign conventions,
and Pacejka ’94 conforms to the standard SAE tire coordinate system and sign conventions. MSC
maintains these conventions to ensure file compatibility for Adams/Tire customers.
Future tire models will adhere to one single coordinate system standard, the TYDEX C-axis and W-axis
system. For more information on the TYDEX standard, see Standard Tire Interface (STI).
Normal Force
The normal force Fz is calculated assuming a linear spring (stiffness: kz) and damper (damping constant
cz), so the next equation holds:
If the tire loses contact with the road, the tire deflection and deflection velocity become zero, so the
resulting normal force Fzwill also be zero. For very small positive tire deflections, the value of the
damping constant is reduced and care is taken to ensure that the normal force Fz will not become
negative.
In stead of the linear vertical tire stiffness cz , also an arbitrary tire deflection - load curve can be defined
in the tire property file in the section [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE], see also the example tire
property files, Example of Pacejka ’89 Property File and Example of Pacejka ’94 Property File. If a
section called [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] exists, the load deflection datapoints with a cubic
spline for inter- and extrapolation are used for the calculation of the vertical force of the tire. Note that
you must specify VERTICAL_STIFFNESS in the tire property, but it does not play any role.
Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities at combined cornering and braking/traction
The longitudinal slip velocity Vsx in the SAE-axis system is defined using the longitudinal speed Vx, the
wheel rotational velocity , and the loaded rolling radius Rl:
Fz kzρ czρ·
+=
ρ ρ·
Ω
Adams/Tire
138
The lateral slip velocity is equal to the lateral speed in the contact point with respect to the road plane:
The practical slip quantities (longitudinal slip) and (slip angle) are calculated with these slip
velocities in the contact point:
and
Note that for realistic tire forces the slip angle is limited to 900 and the longitudinal slip in
between -1 (locked wheel) and 1.
Lagged longitudinal and lateral slip quantities (transient tire behavior)
In general, the tire rotational speed and lateral slip will change continuously because of the changing
interaction forces in between the tire and the road. Often the tire dynamic response will have an important
role on the overall vehicle response. For modeling this so-called transient tire behavior, a first-order
system is used both for the longitudinal slip ? as the side slip angle, ?. Considering the tire belt as a
stretched string, which is supported to the rim with lateral springs, the lateral deflection of the belt can
be estimated (see also reference [1]). The figure below shows a top-view of the string model.
Stretched String Model for Transient Tire behavior
When rolling, the first point having contact with the road adheres to the road (no sliding assumed).
Therefore, a lateral deflection of the string will arise that depends on the slip angle size and the history
of the lateral deflection of previous points having contact with the road.
Vsx Vx ΩRl–=
Vsy Vy=
κ α
κVsx
Vx
--------–= αtanVsy
Vx
---------=
α κ
139Tire Models
For calculating the lateral deflection v1 of the string in the first point of contact with the road, the
following differential equation is valid during braking slip:
with the relaxation length in the lateral direction. The turnslip can be neglected at radii larger than
10 m. This differential equation cannot be used at zero speed, but when multiplying with Vx, the equation
can be transformed to:
When the tire is rolling, the lateral deflection depends on the lateral slip speed; at standstill, the deflection
depends on the relaxation length, which is a measure for the lateral stiffness of the tire. Therefore, with
this approach, the tire is responding to a slip speed when rolling and behaving like a spring at standstill.
A similar approach yields the following for the deflection of the string in longitudinal direction:
Now the practical slip quantities, and , are defined based on the tire deformation:
These practical slip quantities and are used instead of the usual and definitions for steady-
state tire behavior.
The longitudinal and lateral relaxation length are estimated with the longitudinal and lateral stiffness of
the non-rolling tire:
For BCDx and BCDy see section Force and Moment Formulation for Pacejka '89 or '94.
In case the longitudinal stiffness is not available in the tire property file the longitudinal stiffness is
estimated with:
1
Vx
------dv1
dt--------
v1
σ α------+ αtan aφ+=
σ α φ
σ α
dv1
dt-------- Vx v1+ σ αVsy=
σ κ
du1dt-------- Vx u1+ σ– κVsx=
κ' α '
κ'u1
σ κ------ Vx( )sgn=
α 'v1
σ α------
atan=
κ' α ' κ α
σ κ
BCDx
longitudinal_stiffness--------------------------------------------------------= and σ α
BCDy
lateral_stiffness-------------------------------------------=
Adams/Tire
140
Using Pacejka '89 Handling Force Model
Learn about the Pacejka '89 handling force model:
• Using Correct Coordinate System and Units
• Force and Moment Formulation for Pacejka ’89
• Example of Pacejka ’89 Property File
Using Correct Coordinate System and Units in Pacejka '89The test data and resulting coefficients that come from the Pacejka '89 tire model conform to a modified
SAE tire coordinate system. The standard SAE tire coordinate system is shown next and the modified
sign conventions for Pacejka '89 are described in the table below.
SAE Tire Coordinate System
longitudinal_stiffness 4 lateral_stiffness×=
Note: The section [UNITS] in the tire property file does not apply to the Magic Formula
coefficients.
141Tire Models
Conventions for Naming Variables
Force and Moment Formulation for Pacejka '89• Longitudinal Force for Pacejka '89
• Lateral Force
• Self-Aligning Torque
• Overturning Moment
• Rolling Resistance
• Smoothing
Longitudinal Force for Pacejka '89
C - Shape Factor
C=B0
D - Peak Factor
D=(B1*FZ2+B2*FZ)
BCD
BCD=(B3*FZ2+B4*FZ)*EXP(-B5*FZ)
B - Stiffness Factor
B=BCD/(C*D)
Variable name and abbreviation: Description:
Normal load Fz (kN) Positive when the tire is penetrating the
road.*
Lateral force Fy (N) Positive in a right turn.
Negative in a left turn.
Longitudinal force Fx (N) Positive during traction.
Negative during braking.
Self-aligning torque Mz (Nm) Positive in a left turn.
Negative in a right turn.
Inclination angle (deg) Positive when the top of the tire tilts to the
right (when viewing the tire from the
rear).*
Sideslip angle (deg) Positive in a right turn.*
Longitudinal slip (%) Negative in braking (-100%: wheel lock).
Positive in traction.
* Opposite convention to standard SAE coordinate system shown in SAE Tire Coordinate System.
γ
ακ
Adams/Tire
142
Horizontal Shift
Sh=B9*FZ+B10
Vertical Shift
Sv=0.0
Composite
X1=(k+Sh)
E Curvature Factor
E=(B6*FZ2+B7*FZ+B8)
FX Equation
FX=(D*SIN(C*ATAN(B*X1-E*(B*X1-ATAN(B*X1)))))+Sv
Longitudinal Force
Example Longitudinal Force Plot for Pacejka ’89
Parameters: Description:
B0 Shape factor
B1, B2 Peak factor
B3, B4, B5 BCD calculation
B6, B,7 B8 Curvature factor
B9, B10 Horizontal shift
143Tire Models
Lateral Force for Pacejka '89
C - Shape Factor
C=A0
D - Peak Factor
D=(A1*FZ2+A2*FZ)
BCD
BCD=A3*SIN(ATAN(FZ/A4)*2.0)*(1.0-A5*ABS(g))
B - Stiffness Factor
B=BCD/(C*D)
Horizontal Shift
Sh=A9*FZ+A10+A8*g
Vertical Shift
Sv=A11*FZ*g+A12*FZ+A13
Composite
X1=(a+Sh)
E - Curvature Factor
E=(A6*FZ+A7)
Adams/Tire
144
FY Equation
FY=(D*SIN(C*ATAN(B*X1-E*(B*X1-ATAN(B*X1)))))+Sv
Parameters for Lateral Force
Example Lateral Force Plot for Pacejka ’89
Self-Aligning Torque
C - Shape Factor
C=C0
D - Peak Factor
Parameters: Description:
A0 Shape factor
A1, A2 Peak factor
A3, A4, A5 BCD calculation
A6, A7 Curvature factor
A8, A9, A10 Horizontal shift
A11, A12, A13 Vertical shift
145Tire Models
D=(C1*FZ2+C2*FZ)
BCD
BCD=(C3*FZ2+C4*FZ)*(1-C6*ABS(g))*EXP(-C5*FZ)
B - Stiffness Factor
B=BCD/(C*D)
Horizontal Shift
Sh=C11*g+C12*FZ+C13
Vertical Shift
Sv= (C14*FZ2+C15*FZ)*g+C16*FZ+C17
Composite
X1=(a+Sh)
E - Curvature Factor
E=(C7*FZ2+C8*FZ+C9)*(1.0-C10*ABS(g))
MZ Equation
MZ=(D*SIN(C*ATAN(B*X1-E*(B*X1-ATAN(B*X1)))))+Sv
Parameters for Self-Aligning Torque
Example Self-Aligning Torque Plot for Pacejka ’89
Parameters: Description:
C0 Shape factor
C1, C2 Peak factor
C3, C4, C5, C6 BCD calculation
C7, C8, C9, C10 Curvature factor
C11, C12, C13 Horizontal shift
C14, C15, C16, C17 Vertical shift
Adams/Tire
146
Overturning Moment
The lateral stiffness is used to calculate an approximate lateral deflection of the contact patch when there
is a lateral force present:
deflection = Fy / lateral_stiffness
This deflection, in turn, is used to calculate an overturning moment due to the vertical force:
Mx (overturning moment) = -Fz * deflection
And an incremental aligning torque due to longtiudinal force (Fx)
Mz = Mz,Magic Formula + Fx * deflection
Here Mz,Magic Formula is the magic formula for aligning torque and Fx * deflection is the contribution
due to the longitudinal force.
Rolling Resistance
The rolling resistance moment My is opposite to the wheel angular velocity. The magnitude is given by:
My = Fz * Lrad * rolling_resistance
Where Fz equals the vertical force and Lrad is the tyre loaded radius. The rolling resistance coefficient
can be entered in the tire property file:
[PARAMETER]ROLLING_RESISTANCE = 0.01
A value of 0.01 introduces a rolling resistance force that is 1% of the vertical load.
147Tire Models
Smoothing
When you indicate smoothing by setting the value of use mode in the tire property file, Adams/Tire
smooths initial transients in the tire force over the first 0.1 seconds of simulation. The longitudinal force,
lateral force, and aligning torque are multiplied by a cubic step function of time. (See STEP in the
Adams/Solver online help.)
Longitudinal Force
FLon = S*FLon
Lateral Force
FLat = S*FLat
Overturning Moment
Mx = S*Mx
Rolling resistance moment
My = S*My
Aligning Torque
Mz = S*Mz
The USE_MODE parameter in the tire property file allows you to switch smoothing on or off:
• USE_MODE = 1 or 2, smoothing is off
• USE_MODE = 3 or 4, smoothing is on
Example of Pacejka '89 Property File$-------------------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER[MDI_HEADER]FILE_TYPE = 'tir'FILE_VERSION = 2.0FILE_FORMAT = 'ASCII'(COMMENTS)comment_string'Tire - XXXXXX''Pressure - XXXXXX''Test Date - XXXXXX''Test tire'$-------------------------------------------------------------UNITS[UNITS]LENGTH = 'mm'FORCE = 'newton'ANGLE = 'radians'MASS = 'kg'TIME = 'sec'$--------------------------------------------------------------------------MODEL
Adams/Tire
148
[MODEL]! use mode 123411121314! ------------------------------------------------------------------------! smoothingXXXX! combinedXXXX! transient X X X X!PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT = 'PAC89'USE_MODE = 12.0TYRESIDE = 'LEFT'$-------------------------------------------------------------DIMENSION[DIMENSION]UNLOADED_RADIUS = 326.0WIDTH = 245.0ASPECT_RATIO = 0.35$-------------------------------------------------------------PARAMETER[PARAMETER]VERTICAL_STIFFNESS = 310.0VERTICAL_DAMPING = 3.1LATERAL_STIFFNESS = 190.0ROLLING_RESISTANCE = 0.0$---------------------------------------------------------------------LOAD_CURVE$ For a non-linear tire vertical stiffness (optional)$ Maximum of 100 points[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen fz 0 0.0 1 212.0 2 428.0 3 648.0 5 1100.010 2300.020 5000.030 8100.0$-------------------------------------------------------------LATERAL_COEFFICIENTS[LATERAL_COEFFICIENTS]a0 = 1.65000a1 = -34.0a2 = 1250.00a3 = 3036.00a4 = 12.80a5 = 0.00501a6 = -0.02103a7 = 0.77394a8 = 0.0022890a9 = 0.013442a10 = 0.003709a11 = 19.1656a12 = 1.21356
149Tire Models
a13 = 6.26206$-------------------------------------------------------------longitudinal[LONGITUDINAL_COEFFICIENTS]b0 = 1.67272b1 = -9.46000b2 = 1490.00b3 = 30.000b4 = 176.000b5 = 0.08860b6 = 0.00402b7 = -0.06150b8 = 0.20000b9 = 0.02990b10 = -0.17600$-------------------------------------------------------------aligning[ALIGNING_COEFFICIENTS]c0 = 2.34000c1 = 1.4950c2 = 6.416654c3 = -3.57403c4 = -0.087737c5 = 0.098410c6 = 0.0027699c7 = -0.0001151c8 = 0.1000c9 = -1.33329c10 = 0.025501c11 = -0.02357c12 = 0.03027c13 = -0.0647c14 = 0.0211329c15 = 0.89469c16 = -0.099443c17 = -3.336941$--------------------------------------------------------------------------shape[SHAPE]radial width 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.85 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0
Using Pacejka '94 Handling Force Model
Learn about the Pacejka '94 handling force model:
Adams/Tire
150
• Using Correct Coordinate System and Units
• Force and Moment Formulation for Pacejka ’94
• Example of Pacejka ’94 Property File
Using Correct Coordinate System and Units in Pacejka '94The test data and resulting coefficients that come from the Pacejka '94 tire model conform to the standard
SAE tire coordinate system. The standard SAE coordinates are shown in SAE Tire Coordinate System.
(See also About Coordinate Systems.) The corresponding sign conventions for Pacejka '94 are described
next
Conventions for Naming Variables
Force and Moment Formulation for Pacejka '94• Longitudinal Force for Pacejka '94
• Lateral Force for Pacejka '94
• Self-Aligning Torque
• Overturning Moment
• Rolling Resistance
• Smoothing
Note: The section [UNITS] in the tire property file does not apply to the Magic Formula
coefficients.
Variable name and abbreviation: Description:
Normal load Fz (kN) Positive when the tire is penetrating the road.
Lateral force Fy (N) Positive in a right turn.
Negative in a left turn.
Longitudinal force Fx (N) Positive during traction.
Negative during braking.
Self-aligning torque Mz (Nm) Positive in a left turn.
Negative in a right turn.
Inclination angle (deg) Positive when the top of the tire tilts to the right
(when viewing the tire from the rear).
Sideslip angle (deg) Positive in a left turn.
Longitudinal slip (%) Negative in braking (-100%: wheel lock).
Positive in traction.
γ
ακ
151Tire Models
Longitudinal Force for Pacejka '94
C - Shape Factor
C=B0
D - Peak Factor
D=(B1*FZ2+B2*FZ) * DLON
BCD
BCD=((B3*FZ2+B4*FZ)*EXP(-B5*FZ)) * BCDLON
B - Stiffness Factor
B=BCD/(C*D)
Horizontal Shift
Sh=B9*Fz+B10
Vertical Shift
Sv=B11*FZ+B12
Composite
X1=(k+Sh)
E Curvature Factor
E=((B6*FZ+B7)*FZ+B8)*(1-(B13*SIGN(1,X1))))
FX Equation
FX=(D*SIN(C*ATAN(B*X1-E*(B*X1-ATAN(B*X1)))))+Sv
Parameters for Longitudinal Force
Lateral Force for Pacejka '94
C - Shape Factor
C=A0
Parameters: Description:
B0 Shape factor
B1, B2 Peak factor
B3, B4, B5 BCD calculation
B6, B7, B8, B13 Curvature factor
B9, B10 Horizontal shift
B11, B12 Vertical shift
DLON, BCDLON Scale factor
Adams/Tire
152
D - Peak Factor
D=((A1*FZ+A2) *(1-A15* 2)*FZ) * DLAT
BCD
BCD=(A3*SIN(ATAN(FZ/A4)*2.0)*(1-A5*ABS( )))* BCDLAT
B - Stiffness Factor
B=BCD/(C*D)
Horizontal Shift
Sh=A8*FZ+A9+A10*
Vertical Shift
Sv=A11*FZ+A12+(A13*FZ2+A14*FZ)*
Composite
X1=(a+Sh)
E - Curvature Factor
E=(A6*FZ+A7)*(1-(((A16*g)+A17)*SIGN(1,X1))))
FY Equation
FY=(D*SIN(C*ATAN(B*X1-E*(B*X1-ATAN(B*X1)))))+Sv
Parameters for Lateral Force
Self-Aligning Torque for Pacejka '94
C - Shape Factor
C=C0
D - Peak Factor
Parameters: Description:
A0 Shape factor
A1, A2, A15 Peak factor
A3, A4, A5 BCD calculation
A6, A7, A16, A17 Curvature factor
A8, A9, A10 Horizontal shift
A11, A12, A13, A14 Vertical shift
DLAT, BCDLAT Scale factor
γ
γ
γ
γ
153Tire Models
D=(C1*FZ2+C2*FZ)*(1-C18* 2)
BCD
BCD=(C3*FZ2+C4*FZ)*(1-(C6*ABS(g)))*EXP(-C5*FZ)
B - Stiffness Factor
B=BCD/(C*D)
Horizontal Shift
Sh=C11*FZ+C12+C13*
Vertical Shift
Sv=C14*FZ+C15+(C16*FZ2+C17*FZ)*
Composite
X1=( +Sh)
E - Curvature Factor
E=(((C7*FZ2)+(C8*FZ)+C9)*(1-(((C19* )+C20)*SIGN(1,X1))))/(1-(C10*ABS( )))
MZ Equation
MZ=(D*SIN(C*ATAN(B*X1-E*(B*X1-ATAN(B*X1)))))+Sv
Parameters for Self-Aligning Torque
Overturning Moment
The lateral stiffness is used to calculate an approximate lateral deflection of the contact patch when there
is a lateral force present:
deflection = Fy / lateral_stiffness
This deflection, in turn, is used to calculate an overturning moment due to the vertical force:
Mx (overturning moment) = -Fz * deflection
Parameters: Description:
C0 Shape factor
C1, C2, C18 Peak factor
C3, C4, C5, C6 BCD calculation
C7, C8, C9, C19, C20 Curvature factor
C11, C12, C13 Horizontal shift
C14, C15, C16, C17 Vertical shift
γ
γ
γ
α
γ γ
Adams/Tire
154
And an incremental aligning torque due to longtiudinal force (Fx):
Mz = Mz,Magic Formula + Fx * deflection
Here Mz,Magic Formula is the magic formula for aligning torque and Fx * deflection is the contribution
due to the longitudinal force.
Rolling Resistance
The rolling resistance moment My is opposite to the wheel angular velocity. The magnitude is given by:
My = Fz * Lrad * rolling_resistance
Where Fz equals the vertical force and Lrad is the tyre loaded radius. The rolling resistance coefficient
can be entered in the tire property file:
[PARAMETER]ROLLING_RESISTANCE = 0.01
A value of 0.01 will introduce a rolling resistance force, which is 1% of the vertical load.
Smoothing
Adams/Tire smooths initial transients in the tire force over the first 0.1 seconds of simulation. The
longitudinal force, lateral force, and aligning torque are multiplied by a cubic step function of time. (See
STEP in the Adams/Solver online help.)
Longitudinal Force
FLon = S*FLon
Lateral Force
FLat = S*FLat
Overturning Moment
Mx = S*Mx
Rolling resistance moment
My = S*My
Aligning Torque
Mz = S*Mz
The USE_MODE parameter in the tire property file allows you to switch smoothing on or off:
• USE_MODE = 1 or 2, smoothing is off
• USE_MODE = 3 or 4, smoothing is on
Example of Pacejka '94 Property File!:FILE_TYPE: tir!:FILE_VERSION: 2
155Tire Models
!:TIRE_VERSION: PAC94!:COMMENT: New File Format v2.1!:FILE_FORMAT: ASCII!:TIMESTAMP: 1996/02/15,13:22:12!:USER: ncos$--------------------------------------------------------------------------units[UNITS] LENGTH = 'inch' FORCE = 'pound_force' ANGLE = 'radians' MASS = 'pound_mass' TIME = 'second'$-------------------------------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]! use mode 12341234! ------------------------------------------------------------------------! smoothingXXXX! combinedXXXX! transient X X X X! PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT = 'PAC94' USE_MODE = 12.0 TYRESIDE = 'LEFT'$--------------------------------------------------------------------dimensions[DIMENSION] UNLOADED_RADIUS = 12.95 WIDTH = 10.0 ASPECT_RATIO = 0.30$---------------------------------------------------------------------parameter[PARAMETER] VERTICAL_STIFFNESS = 2500 VERTICAL_DAMPING = 250.0 LATERAL_STIFFNESS = 1210.0 ROLLING_RESISTANCE = 0.01$---------------------------------------------------------------------load_curve$ Maximum of 100 points (optional)[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen fz0.000 00.039 9430.079 19040.118 28820.197 48930.394 102310.787 222411.181 36031$-----------------------------------------------------------------------scaling
Adams/Tire
156
[SCALING_COEFFICIENTS] DLAT = 0.10000E+01 DLON = 0.10000E+01 BCDLAT = 0.10000E+01 BCDLON = 0.10000E+01 $-----------------------------------------------------------------------lateral [LATERAL_COEFFICIENTS] A0 = 1.5535430E+00 A1 = -1.2854474E+01 A2 = -1.1133711E+03 A3 = -4.4104698E+03 A4 = -1.2518279E+01 A5 = -2.4000120E-03 A6 = 6.5642332E-02 A7 = 2.0865589E-01 A8 = -1.5717978E-02 A9 = 5.8287762E-02 A10 = -9.2761963E-02 A11 = 1.8649096E+01 A12 = -1.8642199E+02 A13 = 1.3462023E+00 A14 = -2.0845180E-01 A15 = 2.3183540E-03 A16 = 6.6483573E-01 A17 = 3.5017404E-01$----------------------------------------------------------------longitudinal[LONGITUDINAL_COEFFICIENTS] B0 = 1.4900000E+00 B1 = -2.8808998E+01 B2 = -1.4016957E+03 B3 = 1.0133759E+02 B4 = -1.7259867E+02 B5 = -6.1757933E-02 B6 = 1.5667623E-02 B7 = 1.8554619E-01 B8 = 1.0000000E+00 B9 = 0.0000000E+00 B10 = 0.0000000E+00 B11 = 0.0000000E+00 B12 = 0.0000000E+00 B13 = 0.0000000E+00$---------------------------------------------------------------------aligning[ALIGNING_COEFFICIENTS] C0 = 2.2300000E+00 C1 = 3.1552342E+00 C2 = -7.1338826E-01 C3 = 8.7134880E+00 C4 = 1.3411892E+01 C5 = -1.0375348E-01 C6 = -5.0880786E-03 C7 = -1.3726071E-02
157Tire Models
C8 = -1.0000000E-01 C9 = -6.1144302E-01 C10 = 3.6187314E-02 C11 = -2.3679781E-03 C12 = 1.7324400E-01 C13 = -1.7680388E-02 C14 = -3.4007351E-01 C15 = -1.6418691E+00 C16 = 4.1322424E-01 C17 = -2.3573702E-01 C18 = 6.0754417E-03 C19 = -4.2525059E-01 C20 = -2.1503067E-01$--------------------------------------------------------------------------shape[SHAPE]radial width 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.85 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0
Combined Slip of Pacejka '89 and '94The combined slip calculation of the Pacejka '89 and '94 tire models is identical. Note that the method
employed here is not part of the Magic Formula as developed by Professor Pacejka, but is an in-house
development of MSC.
Inputs:
• Dimensionless longitudinal slip k (range –1 to 1) and side slip angle a in radians
• Longitudinal force Fx and lateral force Fy calculated using the Magic Formula
• Horizontal/vertical shifts and peak values of the Magic Formula (Sh, Sv, D)
Output:
• Adjusted longitudinal force Fx and lateral force Fy to incorporate the reduction due to combined
slip:
κ* κ Shx+=
α * α Shy+=
SAG α *( )sin=
Adams/Tire
158
Friction coefficients:
Forces corrected for combined slip conditions:
Contact MethodsThe Pacejka '89 and '94 models support the following roads:
• 2D roads, see Using the 2D Road Model.
• 3D roads, see Adams/3D Road Model
These tire models use a one point of contact method; therefore, the wavelength of road obstacles must be
longer than the tire radius for realistic output of the model.
β arcκ*
κ*
( )2
SAG2+
---------------------------------------
cos=
µx act,
Fx Svx–
Fz-------------------- µy act,
Fy Svy–
Fz--------------------
µx max,
Dx
Fz------ µy max,
Dy
Fz------
= =
= =
µx1
1
µx act,-------------
2 βtan
µy max,----------------
2+
--------------------------------------------------------- µyβtan
1
µx max,----------------
2 βtan
µy max,----------------
2+
------------------------------------------------------------= =
Fx comb,
µx
µx act,------------- Fx Svx+( ) Fy comb,
µy
µy act,------------- Fy Svy+( )= =
159Tire Models
Using the UA-Tire ModelLearn about using the University of Arizona (UA) tire model:
• Background Information
• Tire Model Parameters
• Force Evaluation
• Operating Mode: USE_MODE
• Tire Carcass Shape
• Property File Format Example
Background Information for UA-TireThe University of Arizona tire model was originally developed by Drs. P.E. Nikravesh and G. Gim.
Reference documentation: G. Gim, Vehicle Dynamic Simulation with a Comprehensive Model for
Pneumatic Tires, PhD Thesis, University of Arizona, 1988. The UA-Tire model also includes relaxation
effects, both in the longitudinal and lateral direction.
The UA-Tire model calculates the forces at the ground contact point as a function of the tire kinematic
states, see Inputs and Output of the UA-Tire Model. A description of the inputs longitudinal slip k, side
slip a and camber angle can be found in About Tire Kinematic and Force Outputs. The tire
deflection and deflection velocity are determined using either a point follower or durability contact
model. For more information, see Road Models in Adams/Tire. A description of outputs, longitudinal
force Fx, lateral force Fy, normal force Fz, rolling resistance moment My and self aligning moment Mz
is given in About Tire Kinematic and Force Outputs. The required tire model parameters are described
in Tire Model Parameters.
Inputs and Output of the UA-Tire Model
γ
ρ ρ·
Adams/Tire
160
Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities at Combined Cornering and Braking/Traction
161Tire Models
The longitudinal slip velocity Vsx in the SAE-axis system is defined using the longitudinal speed Vx,
the wheel rotational velocity , and the effective rolling radius Re:
The lateral slip velocity is equal to the lateral speed in the contact point with respect to the road plane:
The practical slip quantities (longitudinal slip) and (slip angle) are calculated with these slip
velocities in the contact point:
When the UA Tire is used for the force calculation the slip quantities during positive Vsx (driving) are
defined as:
The rolling speed Vr is determined using the effective rolling radius Re:
Note that for realistic tire forces the slip angle is limited to 45 degrees and the longitudinal slip Ss
(= ) in between -1 (locked wheel) and 1.
Lagged longitudinal and lateral slip quantities (transient tire behavior)
In general, the tire rotational speed and lateral slip will change continuously because of the changing
interaction forces in between the tire and the road. Often the tire dynamic response will have an
important role on the overall vehicle response. For modeling this so-called transient tire behavior, a first-
order system is used both for the longitudinal slip as the side slip angle, . Considering the tire belt as
a stretched string, which is supported to the rim with lateral spring, the lateral deflection of the belt can
be estimated (see also reference [1]). The figure below shows a top-view of the string model.
Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior
ω
Vsx Vx ΩRe–=
Vsy Vy=
κ α
κVsx
Vx
-------- and αtan–Vsy
Vx
---------= =
κVsx
Vr
-------- and αtan–Vsy
Vr
---------= =
Vr ReΩ=
α
κ
κ
Adams/Tire
162
When rolling, the first point having contact with the road adheres to the road (no sliding assumed).
Therefore, a lateral deflection of the string will arise that depends on the slip angle size and the history
of the lateral deflection of previous points having contact with the road.
For calculating the lateral deflection v1 of the string in the first point of contact with the road, the
following differential equation is valid during braking slip:
with the relaxation length in the lateral direction. The turnslip can be neglected at radii larger
than 10 m. This differential equation cannot be used at zero speed, but when multiplying with Vx, the
equation can be transformed to:
When the tire is rolling, the lateral deflection depends on the lateral slip speed; at standstill, the deflection
depends on the relaxation length, which is a measure for the lateral stiffness of the tire. Therefore, with
this approach, the tire is responding to a slip speed when rolling and behaving like a spring at standstill.
When the UA Tire is used for the force calculations, at positive Vsx (traction) the Vx should be replaced
by Vr in these differential equations.
A similar approach yields the following for the deflection of the string in longitudinal direction:
1
Vx
------td
dv1 v1
σ α------+ α( ) aφ+tan=
σ α φ
σ α td
dv1Vx v1+ σ αVsy=
163Tire Models
Now the practical slip quantities, ’ and ’, are defined based on the tire deformation:
These practical slip quantities and are used instead of the usual and definitions for steady-
state tire behavior. kVlow_x and kVlow_y are the damping rates at low speed applied below the
LOW_SPEED_THRESHOLD speed. For the LOW_SPEED_DAMPING parameter in the tire property
file yields:
kVlow_x= 100 · kVlow_y= LOW_SPEED_DAMPING
Tire Model ParametersDefinition of Tire Parameters
σ x td
dv1Vx v1+ σ– αVsx=
κ α
κ'u1σ κ------ kVlowxVsx–
Vx( )sin=
α 'v1
σ α------
kVlowyvsy–
atan=
κ' α ' κ α
Note: If the tire property file's REL_LEN_LON or REL_LEN_LAT = 0, then steady-state tire
behavior is calculated as tire response on change of the slip and .κ α
Symbol:Name in tire property file: Units*: Description:
r1 UNLOADED_R
ADIUS
L Tire unloaded radius
kz VERTICAL_STI
FFNESS
F/L Vertical stiffness
cz VERTICAL_DA
MPING
FT/L Vertical damping
Cr ROLLING_RES
ISTANCE
L Rolling resistance parameter
Cs CSLIP F Longitudinal slip stiffness,
C CALPHA F/A Cornering stiffness,
C CGAMMA F/A Camber stiffness,
UMIN UMIN - Minimum friction coefficient (Sg=1)
κ∂
∂ Fx
κ 0=αα∂
∂ Fy
α 0=γγ∂
∂ Fy
γ 0=
Adams/Tire
164
* L=length, F=force, A=angle, T=time
Force Evaluation in UA-Tire• Normal Force
• Slip Ratios
• Friction Coefficient
Normal Force
The normal force F z is calculated assuming a linear spring (stiffness: k z ) and damper (damping constant
c z ), so the next equation holds:
If the tire loses contact with the road, the tire deflection and deflection velocity become zero so the
resulting normal force F z will also be zero. For very small positive tire deflections the value of the
damping constant is reduced and care is taken to ensure that the normal force Fz will not become
negative.
In stead of the linear vertical tire stiffness cz , also an arbitrary tire deflection - load curve can be defined
in the tire property file in the section [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE], see also the Property File
Format Example. If a section called [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] exists, the load deflection
datapoints with a cubic spline for inter- and extrapolation are used for the calculation of the vertical force
of the tire. Note that you must specify VERTICAL_STIFFNESS in the tire property file but it does not
play any role.
Slip Ratios
For the calculation of the slip forces and moments a number of slip ratios will be introduced:
Longitudinal Slip Ratio: Ss
The absolute value of longitudinal slip ratio, Ss, is defined as:
Where k is limited to be within the range -1 to 1.
UMAX UMAX - Maximum friction coefficient (Ssg=0)
x REL_LEN_LON L Relaxation length in longitudinal direction
y REL_LEN_LAT L Relaxation length in lateral direction
Symbol:Name in tire property file: Units*: Description:
σσ
Fz kzρ czρ·
+=
ρ ρ·
Ss κ=
165Tire Models
Lateral Slip Ratios: Sa , Sg , Sag
The lateral slip ratio due to slip angle, S , is defined as:
The lateral slip ratio due to inclination angle, S , is defined as:
A combined lateral slip ratio due to slip and inclination angles, S , is defined as:
where is the length of the contact patch.
Comprehensive Slip Ratio: Ssag
A comprehensive slip ratio due to longitudinal slip, slip angle, and inclination angle may be defined as:
α
Sα* αtan during braking
1 Ss–( ) αtan during traction
Sα min 1.0 Sα*,( )
=
=
γ
Sγ γsin=
αγ
Sα*
αl γsin
2rl------------–tan during braking
1 Ss–( ) αl γsin
2rl------------tan during traction
=
l 8r1ρ=
Sαγ min 1.0 S*αγ,( )=
S*sαγ Ss2 S2αγ+
Sαγ min 1.0 S*αγ,( )=
=
Adams/Tire
166
Friction Coefficient
The resultant friction coefficient between the tire tread base and the terrain surface is determined as a
function of the resultant slip ratio (Ss ) and friction parameters (UMAX and UMIN ). The friction
parameters are experimentally obtained data representing the kinematic property between the surfaces of
tire tread and the terrain.
A linear relationship between Ss and , the corresponding road-tire friction coefficient, is assumed.
The figure below depicts this relationship.
Linear Tire-Terrain Friction Model
This can be analytically described as:
m = UMAX - (UMAX - UMIN) * Ssag
The friction circle concept allows for different values of longitudinal and lateral friction coefficients ( x
and y) but limits the maximum value for both coefficients to . See the figure below.
Friction Circle Concept
αγ
αγ µ
µ
µ µ
167Tire Models
The relationship that defines the friction circle follows:
or and
where:
Slip Forces and Moments
To compute longitudinal force, lateral force, and self-aligning torque in the SAE coordinate system, you
must perform a test to determine the precise operating conditions. The conditions of interest are:
µx
µ-----
2 µy
µ-----
2
+ 1=
µx µ βcos= µy µ βsin=
βcosSs
Ssαγ
---------- and βsinSαγ
Ssαγ----------= =
Adams/Tire
168
• Case 1: 0
• Case 2: 0 and C S C S
• Case 3: 0 and C S C S
• Forces and moments at the contact point
The lateral force Fh can be decomposed into two components: Fha and Fhg. The two components are in
the same direction if a· g < 0 and in opposite direction if 0.
Case 1. ag < 0
Before computing the longitudinal force, the lateral force, and the self-aligning torque, some slip
parameters and a modified lateral friction coefficient should be determined. If a slip ratio due to the
critical inclination angle is denoted by S c, then it can be evaluated as:
If Ssc represents a slip ratio due to the critical (longitudinal) slip ratio, then it can be evaluated as:
If a slip ratio due to the critical slip angle is denoted by S c, then it can be determined as:
when Ss Ssc.
The term critical stands for the maximum value which allows an elastic deformation of a tire during pure
slip due to pure slip ratio, slip angle, or inclination angle. Whenever any slip ratio becomes greater than
its corresponding critical value, an elastic deformation no longer exists, but instead complete sliding state
represents the contact condition between the tire tread base and the terrain surface.
A nondimensional slip ratio Sn is determined as:
where:
αγ<
αγ≥ α αγ< γ γ
αγ< α αγ< γ γ
αγ<
γ
Sγc µFzCγ------=
Ssc 3µFzCs
-----=
α
Sαc
Cs
Cα------- Ssc
2 Ss2– 3Cγ
Sγ
Cα-------–=
≤
SnB2 B2
2 B1B3–+
B1
-------------------------------------------=
169Tire Models
A nondimensional contact patch length is determined as:
A modified lateral friction coefficient is evaluated as:
where is the available friction as determined by the friction circle.
To determine the longitudinal force, the lateral force, and the self-aligning torque, consider two subcases
separately. The first case is for the elastic deformation state, while the other is for the complete sliding
state without any elastic deformation of a tire. These two subcases are distinguished by slip ratios caused
by the critical values of the slip ratio, the slip angle, and the inclination angle. Specifically, if all of slip
ratios are smaller than those of their corresponding critical values, then there exists an elastic
deformation state, otherwise there exists only complete sliding state between the tire tread base and the
terrain surface.
(i) Elastic Deformation State: S S c, Ss Ssc, and S S c
In the elastic deformation state, the longitudinal force F , the lateral force F , and three components
of the self-aligning torque are written as functions of the elastic stiffness and the slip ratio as well as the
normal force and the friction coefficients, such as:
B1 3µFz( )2 3CγSγ( )2
B2
–
2CαSαCγSγ
B3 CsSs( )2 CαSα( )2+[ ]–
=
=
=
ln 1 Sn–=
µym( )
µym( ) µy
CγSγ
Fz-----------
–=
µy µ βsin=
γ< γ < α < α
ξ τ
Adams/Tire
170
where:
• is the offset between the wheel plane center and the tire tread base.
• is set to zero if it is negative.
• the length of the contact patch.
Mz is the portion of the self-aligning torque generated by the slip angle . Mzs and Mzs are other
components of the self-aligning torque produced by the longitudinal force, which has an offset between
the wheel center plane and the tire tread base, due to the slip angle and the inclination angle ,
respectively. The self-aligning torque Mz is determined as combinations of Mz , Mzs and Mzs .
(ii) Complete Sliding State: S S c, Ss Ssc, and S S c
In the complete sliding state, the longitudinal force, the lateral force, and three components of the self-
aligning torque are determined as functions of the normal force and the friction coefficients without any
elastic stiffness and slip ratio as:
Fξ CsSsln2 µxFz 1 3ln
2– 2ln3+( )
Fη
+
CαSsln2 µy
m( )Fz 1 3ln2– 2ln
3+( ) CγSγ
Mzα
+ +
CαSα1
2---–
2
3---ln+
3
2---µy
m( )FzSn2+ lln
2
Mzsα2
3---CsSsSα ln
33µxµyFz
2
5Cα---------------------- 1 10ln
3– 15ln4 6ln
5–+( )
Mzsγ
+
η Fξ
=
=
=
=
=
η Sγ rl2 l'2 4⁄–=
rl2 l2 4⁄–
l 8rlρ=
α α α γ
α γ
α α γ
γ ≥ γ ≥ α ≥ α
171Tire Models
Case 2: 0 and C S C S
As in Case 1, a slip ratio due to the critical value of the slip ratio can be obtained as:
A slip ratio due to the critical value of the slip angle can be found as:
when Ss Ssc.
The nondimensional slip ratio Sn, is determined as:
where:
Fξ µxFz
Fη µyFz
Mzα 0
Mzα s
3µxµyFz2l
5Cα------------------------
Mzsγ η Fξ
=
=
=
=
=
α γ ≥ α α ≥ γ γ
Sγc 3µFz
Cγ------=
Sαc
Cs
Cα------- Ssc
2 Ss2– 3Cγ
Sγ
Cα-------+=
≤
SnB2 B2
2 B1B3–+
B1
-------------------------------------------=
Adams/Tire
172
The nondimensional contact patch length ln is found from the equation ln = 1 - Sn, and the modified
lateral friction coefficient is expressed as:
For the longitudinal force, the lateral force and the self-aligning torque two subcases should also be
considered separately. A slip ratio due to the critical value of the inclination angle is not needed here since
the required condition for Case 2, C S C S , replaces the critical condition of the inclination
angle.
(i) Elastic Deformation State: Ss Ssc and S Sac
In the elastic deformation state:
(ii) Complete Sliding State: Ss Ssc and S Sac
B1 3µFz( )2 3CγSγ( )2
B2
–
2CαSαCγSγ
B3 CsSs( )2 CαSα( )2+[ ]–
=
=
=
µym( )
µym( ) µy
CγSγ
Fz-----------
+=
α α ≥ γ γ
< α <
Fξ CsSsln2 µxFz 1 3ln
2– 2ln3+( )
Fη
+
CαSsln2 µy
m( )Fz 1 3ln2– 2ln
3+( ) CγSγ
Mzα
+ +
CαSα1
2---–
2
3---ln+
3
2---µy
m( )FzSn2+ lln
2
Mzsα2
3---CsSsSα ln
33µxµyFz
2
5Cα---------------------- 1 10ln
3– 15ln4 6ln
5–+( )
Mzsγ
+
η Fξ
=
=
=
=
=
≥ α ≥
173Tire Models
Case 3: 0 and C S C S
Similar to Cases 1 and 2, slip ratios due to the critical values of the inclination angle and the slip ratio
are obtained as:
The nondimensional slip ratio Sn, is expressed as:
where:
Fξ µxFz
Fη µyFz
Mzα 0
Mzα s
3µxµyFz2l
5Cα------------------------
Mzsγ η Fξ
=
=
=
=
=
α γ ≥ α α < γ γ
Sγc
3µFz CαSα+
3Cγ--------------------------------
Ssc1
Cs
----- 3µFz( )2 CαSα 3CγSγ–( )–
=
=
SnB2 B2
2 B1B3–+
B1
-------------------------------------------=
B1 3µFz( )2 3CγSγ( )2
B2
–
2CαSαCγSγ
B3 CsSs( )2 CαSα( )2+[ ]–
=
=
=
Adams/Tire
174
For the longitudinal force, the lateral force, and the self-aligning torque, two subcases should also be
considered similar to Cases 1 and 2. A slip ratio due to the critical value of the slip angle is not needed
here since the required condition for Case 3, C S C S , replaces the critical condition of
the slip angle.
(i) Elastic Deformation State: S S c and Ss Ssc
In the elastic deformation state, F and Mz can be written:
(ii) Complete Sliding State: S S c and Ss Ssc
In the complete sliding state, F , F , Mz , Mzs , and Mzs can be determined by using:
α α < γ γ
γ < γ <
η α
Fξ CsSsln2 µxFz 1 3ln
2– 2ln3+( )
Fη
+
CαSsln2 µy
m( )Fz 1 3ln2– 2ln
3+( ) CγSγ
Mzα
+ +
CαSα1
2---–
2
3---ln+
3
2---µy
m( )FzSn2+ lln
2
Mzsα2
3---CsSsSα ln
33µxµyFz
2
5Cα---------------------- 1 10ln
3– 15ln4 6ln
5–+( )
Mzsγ
+
η Fξ
=
=
=
=
=
γ ≥ γ ≥
ξ η α α γ
Fξ µxFz
Fη µyFz
Mzα 0
Mzα s
3µxµyFz2l
5Cα------------------------
Mzsγ η Fξ
=
=
=
=
=
175Tire Models
respectively. The longitudinal force F , the lateral force F , and three components of the self-aligning
torques, Mz , Mzs , and Mzs , always have positive values, but they can be transformed to have
positive or negative values depending on the slip ratio s, the slip angle , and the inclination angle in
the SAE coordinate system.
Tire Forces and Moments in the SAE Coordinate System
For the general formulations of the longitudinal force Fx, lateral force Fy, and self-aligning torque Mz,
in the SAE coordinate system, the three possible combinations of the slip ratio, the slip angle, and the
inclination angle are also considered.
Longitudinal Force:
Fx = sin(k) F , for all cases
Lateral Force:
Fy = -sin( ) F , for cases 1 and 2
Fy = sin( ) F , for case 3
Self-aligning Torque:
Mz = sin( ) Mz - sin( ) [-sin( ) Mzs + sin( )Mzs ]
Rolling Resistance Moment:
My = -Cr Fz, for a forward rolling tire.
My = Cr Fz, for a backward rolling tire.
Operating Mode: USE_MODEYou can change the behavior of the tire model through the switch USE_MODE in the [MODEL] section
of the tire property file.
• USE_MODE = 0: Steady-state forces and moments
• The tire forces and moments react instantaneously to changes in the tire kinematic states.
• USE_MODE = 1: Transient tire behavior
• The tire will have a lagged response because of the so-called relaxation length in both
longitudinal and lateral direction. See Lagged Longitudinal and Lateral Slip Quantities
(transient tire behavior).
• The effect of the relaxation lengths will be most pronounced at low forward velocity and/or high
excitation frequencies.
• USE_MODE = 2: Smoothing of forces and moments on startup of the simulation
ξ η
α α γ
α γ
ξ
α η
γ η
α α κ α α γ γ
Adams/Tire
176
• When you indicate smoothing by setting the value of use mode in the tire property file,
Adams/Tire smooths initial transients in the tire force over the first 0.1 seconds of simulation.
The longitudinal force, lateral force, and aligning torque are multiplied by a cubic step function
of time. (See STEP in the Adams/Solver online help.)
Longitudinal Force FLon = S*FLon
Lateral Force FLat = S*FLat
Aligning Torque Mz = S*Mz
Tire Carcass ShapeYou can optionally supply a tire carcass cross-sectional shape in the tire property file in the [SHAPE]
block. The 3D-durability, tire-to-road contact algorithm uses this information when calculating the tire-
to-road volume of interference. If you omit the [SHAPE] block from a tire property file, the tire carcass
cross-section defaults to the rectangle that the tire radius and width define.
You specify the tire carcass shape by entering points in fractions of the tire radius and width. Because
Adams/Tire assumes that the tire cross-section is symmetrical about the wheel plane, you only specify
points for half the width of the tire. The following apply:
• For width, a value of zero (0) lies in the wheel center plane.
• For width, a value of one (1) lies in the plane of the side wall.
• For radius, a value of one (1) lies on the tread.
For example, suppose your tire has a radius of 300 mm and a width of 185 mm and that the tread is joined
to the side wall with a fillet of 12.5 mm radius. The tread then begins to curve to meet the side wall at
>+/- 80 mm from the wheel center plane. If you define the shape table using six points with four points
along the fillet, the resulting table might look like the shape block that is at the end of the property format
example (see SHAPE).
Property File Format Example$--------------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER[MDI_HEADER]FILE_TYPE = 'tir' FILE_VERSION = 2.0FILE_FORMAT = 'ASCII'(COMMENTS) comment_string'Tire - XXXXXX''Pressure - XXXXXX''TestDate - XXXXXX''Test tire''New File Format v2.1'$-------------------------------------------------------------units[UNITS]LENGTH
= 'meter'FORCE
= 'newton'
177Tire Models
ANGLE = 'rad'
MASS = 'kg'
TIME = 'sec'
$-------------------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]! use mode
1 2 3
! ------------------------------------------! relaxation lengths
X
! smoothing X
!PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT
= 'UATIRE'USE_MODE
= 2$---------------------------------------------------------dimension[DIMENSION]UNLOADED_RADIUS
= 0.295WIDTH
= 0.195ASPECT_RATIO
= 0.55$---------------------------------------------------------parameter[PARAMETER]VERTICAL_STIFFNESS
= 190000VERTICAL_DAMPING
= 50ROLLING_RESISTANCE
= 0.003CSLIP
= 80000CALPHA
= 60000CGAMMA
= 3000UMIN
= 0.8UMAX
= 1.1REL_LEN_LON
= 0.6REL_LEN_LAT
= 0.5
Adams/Tire
178
$-------------------------------------------------------------shape[SHAPE]radial width1.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.0$---------------------------------------------------------------------load_curve$ For a non-linear tire vertical stiffness (optional)$ Maximum of 100 points[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen
fz0.000
0.00.001
212.00.002
428.00.003
648.00.005
1100.00.010
2300.00.020
5000.00.030
8100.0
Contact MethodsThe UA-Tire Model supports the following roads
• 2D roads, see Using the 2D Road Model.
• 3D roads, see Adams/3D Road Model
The UA-Tire Model uses a one point of contact method; therefore, the wavelength of road obstacles must
be longer than the tire radius for realistic output of the model.
179Tire Models
PAC MCLearn about using the University of Arizona (UA) tire model:
When to Use PAC MotorcycleMagic-Formula (MF) tire models are considered the state-of-the-art for modeling of the tire-road
interaction forces in Vehicle Dynamics applications. First versions of the mode that were published by
Pacejka considered tire models for car and truck tires. In his book, Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics [1], he
also described a model for motorcycle tires that is backwards compatible with the MF-MCTyre,
previously resold by MSC.Software, and contains the latest developments in this field.
In general, a MF tire model describes the tire behavior for rather smooth roads (road obstacle
wavelengths longer than the tire radius) up to frequencies of 8 Hz. This makes the tire model applicable
for all generic vehicle handling and stability simulations, including:
• Steady-state cornering
• Lane-change maneuvers
• Braking or power-off in a turn
• Split-mu braking tests
• J-turn or other turning maneuvers
• ABS braking, when stopping distance is important (not for tuning ABS control strategies)
• Shimmy and weave phenomena, which can be analyzed when the tire model is used in transient
mode (see USE_MODES of PAC MC: from Simple to Complex)
• All other common vehicle dynamics maneuvers on rather smooth road (wavelength of road
obstacles must be longer than the tire radius)
The PAC MC model has proven to be applicable to motorcycle tires with inclination angles to the road
up to 60 degrees. In some cases, it can be used for car tires when exposed to large camber.
PAC MC and Previous Magic Formula Models
Compared to previous versions, PAC MC is backward compatible with all MF-MCTyre 1.x tire models,
generates the same output, and deals with all previous versions of MF-MCTyre property files.
In addition to PAC MC in Adams, the PAC MC in v2 contins a more advanced tire-road contact modeling
method that takes the tire's cross-section shape into account, which plays an important role at large
inclination angles of the wheel with the road. Learn more about the tire cross-section profile contact
method.
Modeling Tire-Road Interaction ForcesFor vehicle dynamics applications, accurate knowledge of tire-road interaction forces is inevitable
because the movements of a vehicle primarily depend on the road forces on the tires. These interaction
forces depend on both road and tire properties and the motion of the tire with respect to the road.
Adams/Tire
180
In the radial direction, the MF tire models consider the tire to behave as a parallel linear spring and linear
damper with one point of contact with the road surface. The contact point is determined by considering
the tire and wheel as a rigid disc. In the contact point between the tire and the road the contact forces in
longitudinal and lateral direction strongly depend on the slip between the tire patch elements and the
road.
The figure, Input and Output Variables of the Magic Formula Tire Model, presents the input and output
vectors of the PAC MC tire model. The tire model subroutine is linked to the Adams/Solver through the
Standard Tire Interface (STI) ([3]). The input through the STI consists of the:
• Position and velocities of the wheel center
• Orientation of the wheel
• Tire model (MF) parameters
• Road parameters
The tire model routine calculates the vertical load and slip quantities based on the position and speed of
the wheel with respect to the road. The input for the Magic Formula consists of the wheel load ( ), the
longitudinal and lateral slip ( , ), and inclination angle ( ) with the road. The output is the forces
( , ) and moments ( , , ) in the contact point between the tire and the road. For
calculating these forces, the MF equations use a set of MF parameters, which are derived from tire testing
data.
The forces and moments out of the Magic Formula are transferred to the wheel center and returned to
Adams/Solver through the STI.
Input and Output Variables of the Magic Formula Tire Model
Fz
κ α γ
Fx Fy Mx My Mz
181Tire Models
Axis Systems and Slip Definitions• Axis System
• Units
• Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
Axis System
The PAC MC model is linked to Adams/Solver using the TYDEX STI conventions as described in the
TYDEX-Format [2] and the STI [3].
The STI interface between the PAC MC model and Adams/Solver mainly passes information to the tire
model in the C-axis coordinate system. In the tire model itself, a conversion is made to the W-axis system
because all the modeling of the tire behavior, as described in this help, assumes to deal with the slip
quantities, orientation, forces, and moments in the contact point with the TYDEX W-axis system. Both
axis systems have the ISO orientation but have a different origin as can be seen in the figure below.
TYDEX C- and W-Axis Systems Used in PAC MC, Source[2]
The C-axis system is fixed to the wheel carrier with the longitudinal xc-axis parallel to the road and in
the wheel plane (xc-zc-plane). The origin of the C-axis system is the wheel center.
The origin of the W-axis system is the road contact-point defined by the intersection of the wheel plane,
the plane through the wheel carrier, and the road tangent plane.
The forces and moments calculated by PAC MC using the MF equations in this guide are in the W-axis
system. A transformation is made in the source code to return the forces and moments through the STI
to Adams/Solver.
The inclination angle is defined as the angle between the wheel plane and the normal to the road tangent
plane (xw-yw-plane).
Adams/Tire
182
Units
The units of information transferred through the STI between Adams/Solver and PAC MC are according
to the SI unit system. Also, the equations for PAC MC described in this guide have been developed for
use with SI units, although you can easily switch to another unit system in your tire property file. Because
of the non-dimensional parameters, only a few parameters have units to be changed.
However, the parameters in the tire property file must always be valid for the TYDEX W-axis system
(ISO oriented). The basic SI units are listed in the table below.
SI Units Used in PAC MC
Definition of Tire Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities at Combined Cornering and Braking/Traction
Variable Type: Name: Abbreviation: Unit:
Angle Slip angle
Inclination angle
Radians
Force Longitudinal force
Lateral force
Vertical load
Newton
Moment Overturning moment
Rolling resistance
moment
Self-aligning moment
Newton.meter
Speed Longitudinal speed
Lateral speed
Longitudinal slip speed
Lateral slip speed
Meters per second
Rotational speed Tire rolling speed Radians per second
α
γFx
Fy
FzMx
My
Mz
Vx
Vy
Vsx
Vsy
ω
183Tire Models
The longitudinal slip velocity in the contact point (W-axis system, see the figure, Slip Quantities
at Combined Cornering) is defined using the longitudinal speed , the wheel rotational velocity ,
and the effective rolling radius :
(204)
The lateral slip velocity is equal to the lateral speed in the contact point with respect to the road plane:
(205)
The practical slip quantities (longitudinal slip) and (slip angle) are calculated with these slip
velocities in the contact point with:
(206)
(207)
The rolling speed Vr is determined using the effective rolling radius Re:
(208)
Contact-Point and Normal Load Calculation• Contact Point
• Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius
Contact Point
In the vertical direction, the tire is modeled as a parallel linear spring and damper having one point of
contact (C) with the road. This is valid for road obstacles with a wavelength larger than the tire radius
(for example, for car tires 1m).
Vsx
Vx ω
Re
Vsx Vx ΩRe–=
Vsy Vy=
κ α
κVsx
Vx
--------–=
α( )tanVsy
Vx
---------=
Vr ReΩ=
Adams/Tire
184
For calculating the kinematics of the tire relative to the road, the road is approximated by its tangent plane
at the road point right below the wheel center (see figure below).
Contact Point C: Intersection between Road Tangent Plane, Spin Axis Plane, and Wheel Plane
The contact point is determined by the line of intersection of the wheel center-plane with the road tangent
(ground) plane and the line of intersection of the wheel center-plane with the plane though the wheel spin
axis.
The normal load of the tire is calculated with:
(209)
where is the tire deflection and is the deflection rate of the tire.
To take into account the effect of the tire cross-section profile, you can choose a more advanced method
(see the Tire Cross Section Profile Contact Method).
Instead of the linear vertical tire stiffness Cz, also an arbitrary tire deflection - load curve can be defined
in the tire property file in the section [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]. If a section called
[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] exists, the load deflection datapoints with a cubic spline for inter- and
extrapolation are used for the calculation of the vertical force of the tire. Note that you must specify
in the tire property file, but it does not play any role.
Fz
Fz Czρ Kz ρ·⋅+=
ρ ρ·
Cz
185Tire Models
Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius
With the loaded rolling tire radius R defined as the distance of the wheel center to the contact point of
the tire with the road (see Effective Rolling Radius and Longitudinal Slip), where r is the deflection of
the tire, and R0 is the free (unloaded) tire radius, then the loaded tire radius Rl reads:
(210)
In this tire model, a constant (linear) vertical tire stiffness is assumed; therefore, the tire deflection
can be calculated using:
(211)
The effective rolling radius Re (at free rolling of the tire), which is used to calculate the rotational speed
of the tire, is defined by:
(212)
For radial tires, the effective rolling radius is rather independent of load in its load range of operation due
to the high stiffness of the tire belt circumference. Only at low loads does the effective tire radius
decrease with increasing vertical load due to the tire tread thickness. See the figure below.
Effective Rolling Radius and Longitudinal Slip
R1 R0 ρ–=
Cz
ρ
ρFzCz
------=
Re
Vx
Ω------=
Adams/Tire
186
To represent the effective rolling radius Re, a MF-type of equation is used:
(213)
in which is the nominal tire deflection:
(214)
and is called the dimensionless radial tire deflection, defined by:
(215)
Re R0 ρ Fz0 D Bρ d( ) Fρ d+( )atan⋅( )–=
ρ Fz0
ρ Fz0Fz0
Cz
--------=
ρ d
ρ d ρρ Fz0---------=
187Tire Models
Example of the Loaded and Effective Tire Rolling Radius as a Function of the Vertical Load
Normal Load and Rolling Radius Parameters
Basics of the Magic Formula in PAC MCThe Magic Formula is a mathematical formula that is capable of describing the basic tire characteristics
for the interaction forces between the tire and the road under several steady-state operating conditions.
We distinguish:
• Pure cornering slip conditions: cornering with a free rolling tire
Name:
Name Used in Tire Property File: Explanation:
FNOMIN Nominal wheel load
UNLOADED_RADIUS Free tire radius
BREFF Low load stiffness effective rolling radius
DREFF Peak value of effective rolling radius
FREFF High load stiffness effective rolling radius
VERTICAL_STIFFNESS Tire vertical stiffness
VERTICAL_DAMPING Tire vertical damping
Fz0R0
B
D
F
Cz
KZ
Adams/Tire
188
• Pure longitudinal slip conditions: braking or driving the tire without cornering
• Combined slip conditions: cornering and longitudinal slip simultaneously
For pure slip conditions, the lateral force as a function of the lateral slip , respectively, and the
longitudinal force as a function of longitudinal slip , have a similar shape (see the figure,
Characteristic Curves for Fx and Fy Under Pure Slip Conditions). Because of the sine - arctangent
combination, the basic Magic Formula example is capable of describing this shape:
(216)
where Y(x) is either with x the longitudinal slip , or and x the lateral slip .
Characteristic Curves for Fx and Fy Under Pure Slip Conditions
The self-aligning moment is calculated as a product of the lateral force and the pneumatic trail t
added with the residual moment . In fact, the aligning moment is due to the offset of lateral force ,
called pneumatic trail t, from the contact point. Because the pneumatic trail t as a function of the lateral
slip has a cosine shape, a cosine version the Magic Formula is used:
(217)
in which Y(x) is the pneumatic trail t as function of slip angle .
The figure, The Magic Formula and the Meaning of Its Parameters, illustrates the functionality of the B,
C, D, and E factor in the Magic Formula:
• D-factor determines the peak of the characteristic, and is called the peak factor.
Fy α
Fx κ
Y x( ) D c bx E bx bx( )atan–( )–( )atan⋅[ ]cos⋅=
Fx κ Fy α
Mz Fy
Mzr Fy
α
Y x( ) D C Bx E Bx Bx( )atan–( )–( )atan⋅[ ]cos⋅=
α
189Tire Models
• C-factor determines the part used of the sine and, therefore, mainly influences the shape of the
curve (shape factor).
• B-factor stretches the curve and is called the stiffness factor.
• E-factor can modify the characteristic around the peak of the curve (curvature factor).
The Magic Formula and the Meaning of Its Parameters
Adams/Tire
190
In combined slip conditions, the lateral force decreases due to longitudinal slip or the opposite, the
longitudinal force decreases due to lateral slip. The forces and moments in combined slip conditions
Fy
Fx
191Tire Models
are based on the pure slip characteristics multiplied by the so-called weighting functions. Again, these
weighting functions have a cosine-shaped MF examples.
The Magic Formula itself only describes steady-state tire behavior. For transient tire behavior (up to 8
Hz), the MF output is used in a stretched string model that considers tire belt deflections instead of slip
velocities to cope with standstill situations (zero speed).
Inclination Effects in the Lateral Force
From a historical point of view, the basic Magic Formulas have always been developed for car and truck
tires, which cope with inclinations angles of not more than 10 degrees. To be able to describe the effects
at large inclinations, an extension of the basic Magic Formula for the lateral force Fy has been developed.
A contribution of the inclination has also been added within the MF sine function:
(218)
This elegant formulation has the advantage of an explicit definition of the camber stiffness, because this
results now in:
(219)
Input Variables
The input variables to the Magic Formula are:
Input Variables
Output Variables
Its output variables are:
Output Variables
Longitudinal slip [-]
Slip angle [rad]
Inclination angle [rad]
Normal wheel load Fz [N]
Longitudinal force Fx [N]
Lateral force Fy [N]
γ
Fy0 Dy Cyarc Byαy Ey Byα y arc Byα y( )tan–( )– Cγarc Bγγy Eγ Bγγy arc Bγγy( )tan–( )– tan+
tan[]
sin=
Kγ BγCγDγ γ∂
∂ Fyo= = at α y 0=
καγ
Adams/Tire
192
The output variables are defined in the W-axis system of TYDEX.
Basic Tire Parameters
All tire model parameters of the model are without dimension. The reference parameters for the model
are:
Basic Tire Parameters
As a measure for the vertical load, the normalized vertical load increment dfz is used:
(220)
with the possibly adapted nominal load (using the user-scaling factor, ):
(221)
Nomenclature of the Tire Model Parameters
In the subsequent sections, formulas are given with non-dimensional parameters aijk with the following
logic:
Tire Model Parameters
Overturning couple Mx [Nm]
Rolling resistance moment My [Nm]
Aligning moment Mz [Nm]
Nominal (rated) load Fz0 [N]
Unloaded tire radius R0 [m]
Tire belt mass mbelt [kg]
Parameter: Definition:
a = p Force at pure slip
q Moment at pure slip
r Force at combined slip
s Moment at combined slip
dfzFz F'z0–
F'z0--------------------=
λ Fz0
F'z0 Fz0 λ Fz0⋅=
193Tire Models
User Scaling Factors
A set of scaling factors is available to easily examine the influence of changing tire properties without
the need to change one of the real Magic Formula coefficients. The default value of these factors is 1.
You can change the factors in the tire property file. The peak friction scaling factors, and ,
are also used for the position-dependent friction in 3D Road Contact and Adams/3D Road. An overview
of all scaling factors is shown in the next tables.
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Pure Slip
i = B Stiffness factor
C Shape factor
D Peak value
E Curvature factor
K Slip stiffness = BCD
H Horizontal shift
V Vertical shift
s Moment at combined slip
t Transient tire behavior
j = x Along the longitudinal axis
y Along the lateral axis
z About the vertical axis
k = 1, 2, ...
Name:
Name used in tire
property file: Explanation:
LFZO Scale factor of nominal (rated) load
Cx LCX Scale factor of Fx shape factor
LMUX Scale factor of Fx peak friction coefficient
Ex LEX Scale factor of Fx curvature factor
Kx LKX Scale factor of Fx slip stiffness
Vx LVX Scale factor of Fx vertical shift
x LGAX Scale factor of camber for Fx
Cy LCY Scale factor of Fy shape factor
Parameter: Definition:
λ µξ λ γψ
λ Fz0λλ µξλλλλ γλ
Adams/Tire
194
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Combined Slip
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Combined Slip
y LMUY Scale factor of Fy peak friction coefficient
Ey LEY Scale factor of Fy curvature factor
Ky LKY Scale factor of Fy cornering stiffness
C LCC Scale factor of camber shape factor
K LKC Scale factor of camber stiffness (K-factor)
E LEC Scale factor of camber curvature factor
Hyy LHY Scale factor of Fy horizontal shift
LGAY Scale factor of camber force stiffness
t LTR Scale factor of peak of pneumatic trail
Mr LRES Scale factor for offset of residual torque
gz LGAZ Scale factor of camber torque stiffness
Mx LMX Scale factor of overturning couple
VMxMx LVMX Scale factor of Mx vertical shift
My LMY Scale factor of rolling resistance torque
Name:
Name used in tire property
file: Explanation:
x LXAL Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
y LYKA Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
Vy LVYKA Scale factor of kappa induced Fy
s LS Scale factor of Moment arm of Fx
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
x LXAL Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
y LYKA Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx
Vy LVYKA Scale factor of kappa induced Fy
s LS Scale factor of Moment arm of Fx
Name:
Name used in tire
property file: Explanation:
λ µλλλ γλ γλ γλλ γψλλλλλλ
λ αλ κλ κλ
λ αλ κλ κλ
195Tire Models
Scaling Factor Coefficients for Transient Response
Steady-State: Magic Formula for PAC MC• Steady-State Pure Slip
• Steady-State Combined Slip
Steady-State Pure Slip
• Longitudinal Force at Pure Slip
• Lateral Force at Pure Slip
• Aligning Moment at Pure Slip
Formulas for the Longitudinal Force at Pure Slip
For the tire rolling on a straight line with no slip angle, the formulas are:
(222)
(223)
(224)
(225)
with following coefficients:
(226)
(227)
(228)
(229)
the longitudinal slip stiffness:
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
LSGKP Scale factor of relaxation length of Fx
LSGAL Scale factor of relaxation length of Fy
gyr LGYR Scale factor of gyroscopic moment
σ κσ αλ
Fx Fx0 κ Fz γ, ,( )=
Fx0 Dx Cxarc Bxκx Ex Bxκx arc Bxκx( )tan–( )– tan[ ] SVx+sin=
κx κ SHx+=
γx γ λ γx⋅=
Cx pCx1 λ Cx⋅=
Dx µx Fz ζ1⋅ ⋅=
µx pDx1 pDx2dfz+( ) 1 pDx3 γx2⋅–( )λ µx⋅=
Ex pEx1 pEx2dfz pEx3dfz2+ +( ) 1 pEx4 κx( )sgn– λ Ex with Ex 1≤⋅ ⋅=
Adams/Tire
196
(230)
(231)
(232)
(233)
Longitudinal Force Coefficients at Pure Slip
Formulas for the Lateral Force at Pure Slip
(234)
(235)
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pCx1 PCX1 Shape factor Cfx for longitudinal force
pDx1 PDX1 Longitudinal friction Mux at Fznom
pDx2 PDX2 Variation of friction Mux with load
pDx3 PDX3 Variation of friction Mux with camber
pEx1 PEX1 Longitudinal curvature Efx at Fznom
pEx2 PEX2 Variation of curvature Efx with load
pEx3 PEX3 Variation of curvature Efx with load squared
pEx4 PEX4 Factor in curvature Efx while driving
pKx1 PKX1 Longitudinal slip stiffness Kfx/Fz at Fznom
pKx2 PKX2 Variation of slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
pKx3 PKX3 Exponent in slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load
pVx1 PVX1 Vertical shift Svx/Fz at Fznom
pVx2 PVX2 Variation of shift Svx/Fz with load
Kx Fz pKx1 pKx2dfz+( ) pKx3dfz( ) λ K
(Kx
⋅exp⋅ ⋅
BxCxDx κx∂
∂ Fx0at κx 0 )
=
= = =
Bx Kx CxDx( )⁄=
SHx psy1Fzλ My SVx+( ) Kx⁄–=
SVx Fz pVx1 pVx2dfz+( ) λ Vx λ µx ζ1⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅=
Fy Fy0 α γ Fz, ,( )=
Fy0 Dy Cyarc Byα y Ey Byαy arc Byα y( )tan–( )–
Cγarc Bγγy Eγ Bγγy arc Bγγy( )tan–( )– tan+
tan[
]
sin=
197Tire Models
(236)
The scaled inclination angle:
(237)
with coefficients:
(238)
(239)
(240)
(241)
The cornering stiffness:
(242)
(243)
(244)
(245)
and the explicit camber stiffness:
(246)
(247)
(248)
α y α SHy Cy Cγ 2<+( )+=
γy γ λ γy⋅=
Cy pCy1 λ Cy⋅=
Dy µy Fz ζ2⋅ ⋅=
µy pDy1 pDy2dfz( ) 1 pDy3γy2–( ) λ µy⋅ ⋅exp⋅=
Ey pEy1 pEy2γy2 pEy3 pEy4γy+( ) α y( )sin⋅–+ λ Ey with Ey 1≤⋅=
Ky pKy1Fzo pKy2arcFz
pKy3 pKy4γy2+( )Fzoλ Fzo
-----------------------------------------------------------
tan
1 pKy5γy2–( ) λ Fzo λ Ky
(Ky
⋅ ⋅
sin
ByCyDy α y∂
∂ Fyoat α y 0 )
=
= = =
By Ky CyDy( )⁄=
SHy pHy1 λ Hy⋅=
Cγ pCy2 λ Cγ⋅=
Kγ pKy6 pKy7dfz+( ) Fz λ Kγ (=BγCγDγ⋅ ⋅γ∂
∂ Fyoat α y 0= = =
Eγ pEy5 λ Eγ with Eγ 1≤⋅=
Bγ Kγ CγDγ( )⁄=
Adams/Tire
198
Lateral Force Coefficients at Pure Slip
Formulas for the Aligning Moment at Pure Slip
(249)
with the pneumatic trail t:
(250)
(251)
and the residual moment Mzr:
(252)
Name:Name used in
tire property file: Explanation:
pCy1 PCY1 Shape factor Cfy for lateral forces
pCy2 PCY2 Shape factor Cfc for camber forces
pDy1 PDY1 Lateral friction Muy
pDy2 PDY2 Exponent lateral friction Muy
pDy3 PDY3 Variation of friction Muy with squared camber
pEy1 PEY1 Lateral curvature Efy at Fznom
pEy2 PEY2 Variation of curvature Efy with camber squared
pEy3 PEY3 Asymmetric curvature Efy at Fznom
pEy4 PEY4 Asymmetric curvature Efy with camber
pEy5 PEY5 Camber curvature Efc
pKy1 PKY1 Maximum value of stiffness Kfy/Fznom
pKy2 PKY2 Curvature of stiffness Kfy
pKy3 PKY3 Peak stiffness factor
pKy4 PKY4 Peak stiffness variation with camber squared
pKy5 PKY5 Lateral stiffness dependency with camber squared
pKy6 PKY6 Camber stiffness factor Kfc
pKy7 PKY7 Vertical load dependency of camber stiffness Kfc
pHy1 PHY1 Horizontal shift Shy at Fznom
Mz' Mz0 α γ Fz, ,( )=
Mz0 t Fy0 Mzr+⋅–=
t α t( ) Dt Ctarc Btα t Et Btα t arc Btα t( )tan–( )– tan[ ] α( )coscos=
α t α SHt+=
Mzr α r( ) Dr Crarc Brα r( )tan[ ] α( )cos⋅cos=
199Tire Models
(253)
The scaled inclination angle:
(254)
with coefficients:
(255)
(256)
(257)
(258)
(259)
(260)
(261)
(262)
(263)
An approximation for the aligning moment stiffness reads:
(264)
Aligning Moment Coefficients at Pure Slip
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qBz1 QBZ1 Trail slope factor for trail Bpt at Fznom
qBz2 QBZ2 Variation of slope Bpt with load
qBz3 qBz3 Variation of slope Bpt with load squared
qBz4 QBZ4 Variation of slope Bpt with camber
qBz5 QBZ5 Variation of slope Bpt with absolute camber
α r α SHr+=
γz γ λ γz⋅=
Bt qBx1 qBx2dfz qBx3dfz2+ +( ) 1 qBx4γz qBz5 γz+ + λ Ky λ µy⁄⋅ ⋅=
Ct qCz1=
Dt Fz qDz1 qDz2dfz+( ) 1 qDz3 γz qDz4γz2+ +( ) R0 Fz0⁄( )⋅ ⋅ ⋅=
Et qEx1 qEx2dfz qEx3dfz2+ +( )=
1 qEz4 qEz5γz+( )2
π---
arc Bt Ct α t⋅ ⋅( )tan⋅ ⋅+
with Et 1≤
SHt 0=
Br qBz9 λ Ky λ µy⁄⋅=
Dr Fz qDz6 qDz7dfz+( )λ r qDz8 qDz9dfz+( )γz qDz10 qDz11dfz+( ) γz γz⋅( )+ +[ ]R0λ µy=
SHr qHz1 qHz2dfz qHz3 qHz4dfz+( )γz+ +=
Kz t Ky αd
dMzat α–≈
⋅– 0 )= =
Adams/Tire
200
Steady-State Combined Slip
PAC-TIME has two methods for calculating the combined slip forces and moments. If the user supplies
the coefficients for the combined slip cosine 'weighing' functions, the combined slip is calculated
according to Combined slip with cosine 'weighing' functions (standard method). If no coefficients are
supplied, the so-called friction ellipse is used to estimate the combined slip forces and moments, see
section Combined Slip with friction ellipse
Combined slip with cosine 'weighing' functions
• Longitudinal Force at Combined Slip
• Lateral Force at Combined Slip
• Aligning Moment at Combined Slip
• Overturning Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
qBz9 QBZ9 Slope factor Br of residual torque Mzr
qCz1 QCZ1 Shape factor Cpt for pneumatic trail
qDz1 QDZ1 Peak trail Dpt = Dpt*(Fz/Fznom*R0)
qDz2 QDZ2 Variation of peak Dpt with load
qDz3 QDZ3 Variation of peak Dpt with camber
qDz4 QDZ4 Variation of peak Dpt with camber squared.
qDz6 QDZ6 Peak residual moment Dmr = Dmr/ (Fz*R0)
qDz7 QDZ7 Variation of peak factor Dmr with load
qDz8 QDZ8 Variation of peak factor Dmr with camber
qDz9 QDZ9 Variation of Dmr with camber and load
qDz10 QDZ10 Variation of peak factor Dmr with camber squared
qDz11 QDZ11 Variation of Dmr with camber squared and load
qEz1 QEZ1 Trail curvature Ept at Fznom
qEz2 QEZ2 Variation of curvature Ept with load
qEz3 QEZ3 Variation of curvature Ept with load squared
qEz4 QEZ4 Variation of curvature Ept with sign of Alpha-t
qEz5 QEZ5 Variation of Ept with camber and sign Alpha-t
qHz1 QHZ1 Trail horizontal shift Shr at Fznom
qHz2 QHZ2 Variation of shift Shr with load
qHz3 QHZ3 Variation of shift Shr with camber
qHz4 QHZ4 Variation of shift Sht with camber and load
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
201Tire Models
• Rolling Resistance Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
Formulas for the Longitudinal Force at Combined Slip
(265)
with Gx o the weighting function of the longitudinal force for pure slip.
We write:
(266)
(267)
with coefficients:
(268)
(269)
(270)
(271)
(272)
The weighting function follows as:
(273)
Longitudinal Force Coefficients at Combined Slip
Name:Name used in tire property
file: Explanation:
rBx1 RBX1 Slope factor for combined slip Fx reduction
rBx2 RBX2 Variation of slope Fx reduction with kappa
rBx3 RBX3 Influence of camber on stiffness for Fx reduction
rCx1 RCX1 Shape factor for combined slip Fx reduction
Fx Fx0 Gxα α κ Fz, ,( )⋅=
α
Fx Dxα Cxαarc Bxαα s Exα Bxαα s arc Bxαα s( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos=
α s α SHxα+=
Bxα rBx1 rBx3γ2+( ) arc rBx2κ tan[ ] λ xα⋅cos=
Cxα rCx1=
Dxα
FxoCxαarc BxαSHxα Exα BxαSHxα arc BxαSHxα( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Exα rEx1 rEx2dfz with Exα 1≤+=
SHxα rHx1=
Gxα
Cxαarc Bxαα s Exα Bxαα s arc Bxαα s( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
Cxαarc BxαSHxα Exα BxαSHxα arc BxαSHxα( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Adams/Tire
202
Formulas for Lateral Force at Combined Slip
(274)
with Gyk the weighting function for the lateral force at pure slip and SVyk the ' -induced' side force;
therefore, the lateral force can be written as:
(275)
(276)
with the coefficients:
(277)
(278)
(279)
(280)
(281)
(282)
(283)
The weighting function appears is defined as:
(284)
rEx1 REX1 Curvature factor of combined Fx
rEx2 REX2 Curvature factor of combined Fx with load
rHx1 RHX1 Shift factor for combined slip Fx reduction
Name:Name used in tire property
file: Explanation:
Fx Fx0 Gxα α κ Fz, ,( )⋅=
κ
Fy Dyκ Cyκarc Byκκs Eyκ Byκκs arc Byκκs( )tan–( )– tan[ ] SVyκ+cos=
κs κ SHyk+=
Byκ rBy1 rBy4γ2+( ) arc rBy2 α rBy3–( ) tan[ ] λ yκ⋅cos=
Cyκ rCy1=
Dyκ
FyoCyκarc ByκSHyκ Eyκ ByκSHyκ arc ByκSHyκ( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Eyκ rEy1 rEy2dfz with Eyκ 1≤+=
SHyκ rHy1 rHy2dfz+=
SVyk DVyκ rVy5arc rvy6κ( )tan[ ] λ Vyκ⋅sin=
DVyκ µyFz rVy1 rVy2dfz rVy3γ+ +( ) arc rVy4α( )tan[ ]cos⋅ ⋅=
Gyκ
Cyκarc Byκκs Eyκ Byκκ s arc Byκκs( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos
Cyκarc ByκSHyκ Eyκ ByκSHyκ arc ByκSHyκ( )tan–( )– tan[ ]cos---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
203Tire Models
Lateral Force Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Aligning Moment at Combined Slip
(285)
with:
(286)
(287)
(288)
(289)
(290)
with the arguments:
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
rBy1 RBY1 Slope factor for combined Fy reduction
rBy2 RBY2 Variation of slope Fy reduction with alpha
rBy3 RBY3 Shift term for alpha in slope Fy reduction
rCy1 RCY1 Shape factor for combined Fy reduction
rEy1 REY1 Curvature factor of combined Fy
rEy2 REY2 Curvature factor of combined Fy with load
rHy1 RHY1 Shift factor for combined Fy reduction
rHy2 RHY2 Shift factor for combined Fy reduction with load
rVy1 RVY1 Kappa-induced side force Svyk/Muy*Fz at
Fznom
rVy2 RVY2 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with load
rVy3 RVY3 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with inclination
rVy4 RVY4 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with alpha
rVy5 RVY5 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with kappa
rVy6 RVY6 Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with atan (kappa)
Mz' t Fy' Mzr s Fx⋅+ +⋅–=
t t α t eq,( )=
Dt Ctarc Btα t eq, Et Btα t eq, ac Btα t eq,( )tan–( )– tan[ ] α( )coscos=
F'y γ, 0= Fy SVyκ–=
Mzr Mzr α r eq,( ) Dr arc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ] α( )coscos= =
s ssz1 ssz2 Fy Fz0⁄( ) ssz3 ssz4dfz+( )γ+ + R0 λ s⋅ ⋅=
Adams/Tire
204
(291)
(292)
Aligning Moment Coefficients at Combined Slip
Formulas for Overturning Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
For the overturning moment, the formula reads both for pure and combined slip situations:
(293)
Overturning Moment Coefficients
Formulas for Rolling Resistance Moment at Pure and Combined Slip
The rolling resistance moment is defined by:
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
ssz1 SSZ1 Nominal value of s/R0
effect of Fx on Mz
ssz2 SSZ2 Variation of distance s/R0
with Fy/Fznom
ssz3 SSZ3 Variation of distance s/R0
with inclination
ssz4 SSZ4 Variation of distance s/R0
with load and inclination
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qsx1 QSX1 Lateral force-induced
overturning couple
qsx2 QSX2 Inclination-induced
overturning couple
qsx3 QSX3 Fy-induced overturning
couple
α t eq, arc α2
t
Kx
Ky
------
2
κ2+tan α t( )sgn⋅tan=
α r eq, arc α2
r
Kx
Ky
------
2
κ2+tan α r( )sgn⋅tan=
Mx R0 Fz qsx1λ VMx qsx2 γ qsx3Fy
Fz0--------⋅+⋅–
λ Mx⋅ ⋅=
205Tire Models
(294)
Rolling Resistance Coefficients
Combined Slip with friction ellipse
In case the tire property file does not contain the coefficients for the 'standard' combined slip method
(cosine 'weighing functions), the friction ellipse method is used, as described in this section. Note that
the method employed here is not part of one of the Magic Formula publications by Pacejka, but is an in-
house development of MSC.Software.
The following friction coefficients are defined:
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
qsy1 QSY1 Rolling resistance moment
coefficient
qsy2 QSY2 Rolling resistance moment
depending on Fx
qsy3 QSY3 Rolling resistance moment
depending on speed
qsy4 QSY4 Rolling resistance moment
depending on speed^4
Vref LONGVL Measurement speed
My R0 Fz qSy1 qSy2Fx Fz0⁄ qSy3 Vx Vref⁄ qSy4 Vx Vref⁄( )4+ + + ⋅ ⋅=
κc κ SHxSVxKx
---------+ +=
α c α SHySVyKy
---------+ +=
α∗ α c( )sin=
βκc
κc2
α∗ 2+
-------------------------
acos=
µx act,
Fx 0, SVx–
Fz-------------------------= µy act,
Fy 0, SVy–
Fz-------------------------=
Adams/Tire
206
The forces corrected for the combined slip conditions are:
For aligning moment Mx, rolling resistance My and aligning moment Mz the formulae (283) until and
including (291) are used with =0.
Transient Behavior in PAC MCThe previous Magic Formula examples are valid for steady-state tire behavior. When driving, however,
the tire requires some response time on changes of the inputs. In tire modeling terminology, the low-
frequency behavior (up to 8 Hz) is called transient behavior.
Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior
µx max,
Dx
Fz------= µy max,
Dy
Fz------=
µx1
1
µx act,-------------
2 βtan
µy max,----------------
2+
---------------------------------------------------------=
µyβtan
1
µx max,----------------
2 βtan
µy act,-------------
2+
---------------------------------------------------------=
Fxµx
µx act,-------------Fx 0,= Fy
µy
µy act,-------------Fy 0,=
SVyκ
207Tire Models
For accurate transient tire behavior, you can use the "stretched string" tire model (see also reference [1]).
The tire belt is modeled as stretched string, which is supported to the rim with lateral (and longitudinal)
springs. The figure, Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior, shows a top-view of the string
model. When rolling, the first point having contact with the road adheres to the road (no sliding
assumed). Therefore, a lateral deflection of the string arises that depends on the slip angle size and the
history of the lateral deflection of previous points having contact with the road.
For calculating the lateral deflection v1 of the string in the first point of contact with the road, the
following differential equation is valid:
(295)
with the relaxation length in the lateral direction. The turnslip can be neglected at radii larger
than 10 m. This differential example cannot be used at zero speed, but when multiplying with Vx, the
example can be transformed to:
1
Vx
------td
dv1 v1σ α------+ α( ) aφ+tan=
σ α φ
Adams/Tire
208
(296)
When the tire is rolling, the lateral deflection depends on the lateral slip speed; at standstill, the deflection
depends on the relaxation length, which is a measure for the lateral stiffness of the tire. Therefore, with
this approach, the tire is responding to a slip speed when rolling and behaving like a spring at standstill.
A similar approach yields the following for the deflection of the string in longitudinal direction:
(297)
Both the longitudinal and lateral relaxation length are defined as of the vertical load:
(298)
(299)
Now the practical slip quantities, and , are defined based on the tire deformation:
(300)
(301)
Using these practical slip quantities, and , the Magic Formula examples can be used to calculate
the tire-road interaction forces and moments:
(302)
(303)
(304)
Gyroscopic Couple in PAC MCWhen having fast rotations about the vertical axis in the wheel plane, the inertia of the tire belt may lead
to gyroscopic effects. To cope with this additional moment, the following contribution is added to the
total aligning moment:
σ α td
dv1Vx v1+ σ αVsy=
σ x td
du1Vx u1+ σ xVsx–=
σ x Fz pTx1 pTx2dfz+( ) pTx3dfz( ) R0 Fz0⁄( )λ σ κ⋅exp⋅ ⋅=
σ α pTy1 pTy2arcFz
pTy3 pKy4γ2+( )Fz0λ Fz0
---------------------------------------------------------
tan 1 pKy5γ2–( ) R0λ Fz0λ σ α⋅sin=
κ' α '
κ'u1
σ x
------ Vx( )sin⋅=
α 'v1σ α------
atan=
κ' α '
Fx' Fx α ' κ' Fz, ,( )=
Fy' Fy α ' κ' γ Fz, , ,( )=
Mz' Mz' α ' κ' γ Fz, , ,( )=
209Tire Models
(305)
with the parameters (in addition to the basic tire parameter mbelt):
(306)
and:
(307)
The total aligning moment now becomes:
(308)
Coefficients and Transient Response
Left and Right Side TiresIn general, a tire produces a lateral force and aligning moment at zero slip angle due to the tire
construction, known as conicity and plysteer. In addition, the tire characteristics cannot be symmetric for
positive and negative slip angles.
A tire property file with the parameters for the model results from testing with a tire that is mounted in
a tire test bench comparable either to the left or the right side of a vehicle. If these coefficients are used
Name:Name used in tire property file: Explanation:
pTx1 PTX1 Relaxation length
sigKap0/Fz at Fznom
pTx2 PTX2 Variation of sigKap0/Fz
with load
pTx3 PTX3 Variation of sigKap0/Fz
with exponent of load
pTy1 PTY1 Peak value of relaxation
length Sig_alpha
pTy2 PTY2 Shape factor for lateral
relaxation length
pTy3 PTY3 Load where lateral
relaxation is at maximum
qTz1 QTZ1 Gyroscopic torque constant
Mbelt MBELT Belt mass of the wheel
Mz gyr, cgyrmbeltVr1 td
dvarc Brα r eq,( )tan[ ]cos=
cgyr qTz1 λ gyr⋅=
arc Brα r eq,( )tan cos 1=
Mz Mz' Mz gyr,+=
Adams/Tire
210
for both the left and the right side of the vehicle model, the vehicle does not drive straight at zero steering
wheel angle.
The latest versions of tire property files contain a keyword TYRESIDE in the [MODEL] section that
indicates for which side of the vehicle the tire parameters in that file are valid (TIRESIDE = 'LEFT' or
TIRESIDE = 'RIGHT').
If this keyword is available, Adams/Car corrects for the conicity and plysteer and asymmetry when using
a tire property file on the opposite side of the vehicle. In fact, the tire characteristics are mirrored with
respect to slip angle zero.
In Adams/View this option can only be used when the tire is generated by the graphical user interface:
select Build -> Forces -> Special Force: Tire (see figure of dialog box below).
Next to the LEFT and RIGHT side option of TYRESIDE, you can also select SYMMETRIC: then the
tire characteristics are modified during initialization to show symmetric performance for left and right
side corners and zero conicity and plysteer (no offsets). Also, when you set the tire property file to
SYMMETRIC, the tire characteristics are changed to symmetric behavior.
Create Wheel and Tire Dialog Box in Adams/View
211Tire Models
USE_MODES of PAC MC: from Simple to ComplexThe parameter USE_MODE in the tire property file allows you to switch the output of the PAC MC tire
model from very simple (that is, steady-state cornering) to complex (transient combined cornering and
braking).
The options for USE_MODE and the output of the model are listed in the table below.
Adams/Tire
212
USE_MODE Values of PAC MC and Related Tire Model Output
Contact MethodsThe PAC MC model supports the following roads:
• 2D Roads, see Using the 2D Road Model
• 3D Roads, see Adams/3D Road Model
By default the PAC-MC uses a one point of contact model similar to all the other Adams/Tire Handling
models. However the PAC-MC has an option to take the tire cross section shape into account:
Tire Cross-Section Profile Contact Method
In combination with the 2D Road Model and the 3D Road Model, you can improve the tire-road contact
calculation method by providing the tire's cross-section profile, which has an important influence on the
wheel center height at large inclination angles with the road.
USE MODE: State: Slip conditions:
PAC MC output(forces and moments)
0 Steady state Acts as a vertical
spring and damper
0, 0, Fz, 0, 0, 0
1 Steady state Pure longitudinal
slip
Fx, 0, Fz, 0, My, 0
2 Steady state Pure lateral
(cornering) slip
0, Fy, Fz, Mx, 0, Mz
3 Steady state Longitudinal and
lateral (not
combined)
Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My,
Mz
4 Steady state Combined slip Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My,
Mz
11 Transient Pure longitudinal
slip
Fx, 0, Fz, 0, My, 0
12 Transient Pure lateral
(cornering) slip
0, Fy, Fz, Mx, 0, Mz
13 Transient Longitudinal and
lateral (not
combined)
Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My,
Mz
14 Transient Combined slip Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My,
Mz
213Tire Models
If the tire model reads a section called [SECTION_PROFILE_TABLE] in the tire property file, the cross
section profile will be taken into account for the vertical load calculation of the tire. The method assumes
that the tire deformation will not influence the position of the point with largest penetration (P), which
is valid for motor cycle tires.
The vertical tire load Fz is calculated using the penetration (effpen = ) of the tire through the tangent
road plane in the point C, see Figure above, according to:
(309)
Because in this method the tangent to the cross section profile determines the point P, a high accuracy of
the cross section profile is required. The section height y as function of the tire width x must be a
continous and monotone increasing function. To avoid singularities and instability, it is highly
ρ
Fz Czρ Kz ρ·⋅+=
Adams/Tire
214
recommended to fit measured cross section data with a polynom (for example y = a·x2 + b·x4 + c·x6 +
..) and provide the y cross section height data (y) from the polynom in the tire property file up to the
maximum width of the tire. The profile is assumed to be symmetric with respect to the wheel plane.
Note that the PAC MC model has only one point of contact with the road; therefore, the wavelength of
road obstacles must be longer than the tire radius for realistic output of the model. In addition, the contact
force computed by this tire model is normal to the road plane. Therefore, the contact point does not
generate a longitudinal force when rolling over a short obstacle, such as a cleat or pothole.
For ride and comfort analysis, we recommend more sophisticated tire models, such as Ftire.
Quality Checks for the Tire Model ParametersBecause PAC MC uses an empirical approach to describe tire - road interaction forces, incorrect
parameters can easily result in non-realistic tire behavior. Below is a list of the most important items to
ensure the quality of the parameters in a tire property file:
• Camber (Inclination) Effects
• Validity Range of the Tire Model Input
Camber (Inclination) Effects
Camber stiffness has been explicitly defined in PAC MC (see equation (246). For realistic tire behavior,
the sign of the camber stiffness must be negative (TYDEX W-axis (ISO) system). If the sign is positive,
the coefficients may not be valid for the ISO but for the SAE coordinate system. Note that PAC MC only
uses coefficients for the TYDEX W-axis (ISO) system.
Effect of Positive Camber on the Lateral Force in TYDEX W-axis (ISO) System
Note: Do not change Fz0 (FNOMIN) and R0 (UNLOADED_RADIUS) in your tire property file.
It will change the complete tire characteristics because these two parameters are used to
make all parameters without dimension.
215Tire Models
The table below lists further checks on the PAC MC parameters.
Checklist for PAC MC Parameters and Properties
Parameter/property: Requirement: Explanation:
LONGVL 1 m/s Reference velocity at which
parameters are measured
VXLOW Approximately 1m/s Threshold for scaling down
forces and moments
Dx 0 Peak friction (see equation
(137))
pDx1/pDx2 0 Peak friction Fx must
decrease with increasing
load
Kx 0 Long slip stiffness (see
equation (140))
Dy 0 Peak friction (see equation
(149))
pDy1/pDy2 0 Peak friction Fx must
decrease with increasing
load
>
>
<
<
>
<
Adams/Tire
216
Validity Range of the Tire Model Input
In the tire property file, a range of the input variables has been given in which the tire properties are
supposed to be valid. These validity range parameters are (the listed values can be different):
$------------------------------------------------------long_slip_range [LONG_SLIP_RANGE]KPUMIN
= -1.5 $Minimum valid wheel slip
KPUMAX = 1.5
$Maximum valid wheel slip$-----------------------------------------------------slip_angle_range[SLIP_ANGLE_RANGE]ALPMIN
= -1.5708 $Minimum valid slip angle
ALPMAX = 1.5708 $Maximum valid slip angle
$-----------------------------------------------inclination_slip_range[INCLINATION_ANGLE_RANGE]CAMMIN
= -1.0996 $Minimum valid camber angle
CAMMAX = 1.0996 $Maximum valid camber angle
$-------------------------------------------------vertical_force_range[VERTICAL_FORCE_RANGE]FZMIN
= 73.75 $Minimum allowed wheel load
FZMAX = 3319.5
$Maximum allowed wheel load
Ky 0 Cornering stiffness (see
equation (152))
qsy1 0 Rolling resistance, should in
range of 0.005 - 0.015
K 0 Camber stiffness (see
equation (156))
Parameter/property: Requirement: Explanation:
<
<
γ <
217Tire Models
If one of the input parameters exceeds a minimum or maximum validity value, the calculation in the tire
model will be performed with the minimum or maximum value of this range to avoid non-realistic tire
behavior. In that case, a message appears warning you that one of the inputs exceeds a validity value.
Standard Tire Interface (STI) for PAC MCBecause all Adams products use the Standard Tire Interface (STI) for linking the tire models to
Adams/Solver, below is a brief background of the STI history (see reference [4]).
At the First International Colloquium on Tire Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis on October 21-22,
1991, the International Tire Workshop working group was established (TYDEX).
The working group concentrated on tire measurements and tire models used for vehicle simulation
purposes. For most vehicle dynamics studies, people previously developed their own tire models.
Because all car manufacturers and their tire suppliers have the same goal (that is, development of tires
to improve dynamic safety of the vehicle), it aimed for standardization in tire behavior description.
In TYDEX, two expert groups, consisting of participants of vehicle industry (passenger cars and trucks),
tire manufacturers, other suppliers and research laboratories, had been defined with following goals:
• The first expert group's (Tire Measurements - Tire Modeling) main goal was to specify an
interface between tire measurements and tire models. The result was the TYDEX-Format [2] to
describe tire measurement data.
• The second expert group's (Tire Modeling - Vehicle Modeling) main goal was to specify an
interface between tire models and simulation tools, which resulted in the Standard Tire Interface
(STI) [3]. The use of this interface should ensure that a wide range of simulation software can be
linked to a wide range of tire modeling software.
Definitions• General
• Tire Kinematics
• Slip Quantities
• Force and Moments
Adams/Tire
218
General
General Definitions
Tire Kinematics
Tire Kinematics Definitions
Term: Definition:
Road tangent plane Plane with the normal unit vector (tangent
to the road) in the tire-road contact point C.
C-axis system Coordinate system mounted on the wheel
carrier at the wheel center according to
TYDEX, ISO orientation.
Wheel plane The plane in the wheel centre that is formed
by the wheel when considered a rigid disc
with zero width.
Contact point C Contact point between tire and road,
defined as the intersection of the wheel
plane and the projection of the wheel axis
onto the road plane.
W-axis system Coordinate system at the tire contact point
C, according to TYDEX, ISO orientation.
Parameter: Definition: Units:
R0 Unloaded tire radius [m]
R Loaded tire radius [m]
Re Effective tire radius [m]
Radial tire deflection [m]
d Dimensionless radial tire
deflection
[-]
Fz0 Radial tire deflection at
nominal load
[m]
mbelt Tire belt mass [kg]
Rotational velocity of the
wheel
[rads-1]
ρρ
ρ
ω
219Tire Models
Slip Quantities
Slip Quantities Definitions
Forces and Moments
Force and Moment Definitions
References1. H.B. Pacejka, Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics, 2002, Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 0 7506 5141 5.
2. H.-J. Unrau, J. Zamow, TYDEX-Format, Description and Reference Manual, Release 1.1,
Initiated by the International Tire Working Group, July 1995.
3. A. Riedel, Standard Tire Interface, Release 1.2, Initiated by the Tire Workgroup, June 1995.
Parameter: Definition: Units:
V Vehicle speed [ms-1]
Vsx Slip speed in x direction [ms-1]
Vsy Slip speed in y direction [ms-1]
Vs Resulting slip speed [ms-1]
Vx Rolling speed in x direction [ms-1]
Vy Lateral speed of tire contact
center
[ms-1]
Vr Linear speed of rolling [ms-1]
Longitudinal slip [-]
Slip angle [rad]
Inclination angle [rad]
Abbreviation: Definition: Units:
Fz Vertical wheel load [N]
Fz0 Nominal load [N]
dfz Dimensionless vertical load [-]
Fx Longitudinal force [N]
Fy Lateral force [N]
Mx Overturning moment [Nm]
My Braking/driving moment [Nm]
Mz Aligning moment [Nm]
καγ
Adams/Tire
220
4. J.J.M. van Oosten, H.-J. Unrau, G. Riedel, E. Bakker, TYDEX Workshop: Standardisation of
Data Exchange in Tyre Testing and Tyre Modelling, Proceedings of the 2nd International
Colloquium on Tyre Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis, Vehicle System Dynamics, Volume
27, Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam/Lisse, 1996.
Example of PAC MC Tire Property File[MDI_HEADER]FILE_TYPE ='tir'FILE_VERSION =3.0FILE_FORMAT ='ASCII'! : TIRE_VERSION : PAC Motorcycle! : COMMENT : Tire 180/55R17! : COMMENT : Manufacturer $! : COMMENT : Nom. section with (m) 0.18$! : COMMENT : Nom. aspect ratio (-) 55! : COMMENT : Infl. pressure (Pa) 200000! : COMMENT : Rim radius (m) 0.216$! : COMMENT : Measurement ID$! : COMMENT : Test speed (m/s) 16.7$! : COMMENT : Road surface $! : COMMENT : Road condition Dry! : FILE_FORMAT : ASCII! : Copyright MSC.Software, Mon Oct 20 10:46:57 2003!! USE_MODE specifies the type of calculation performed:! 0: Fz only, no Magic Formula evaluation! 1: Fx,My only! 2: Fy,Mx,Mz only! 3: Fx,Fy,Mx,My,Mz uncombined force/moment calculation! 4: Fx,Fy,Mx,My,Mz combined force/moment calculation! +10: including relaxation behaviour! *-1: mirroring of tyre characteristics!! example: USE_MODE = -12 implies:! -calculation of Fy,Mx,Mz only! -including relaxation effects! -mirrored tyre characteristics!$----------------------------------------------------------------units[UNITS]LENGTH ='meter'FORCE ='newton'
ANGLE ='radians'
MASS ='kg'
TIME ='second'
$----------------------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]
221Tire Models
PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT ='PAC_MC'USE_MODE
= 14 $Tyre use switch (IUSED)
VXLOW = 1
LONGVL = 16.7
$Longitudinal speed during measurements $TYRESIDE
= 'SYMMETRIC' $Mounted side of tyre at vehicle/test bench
$-----------------------------------------------------------dimensions[DIMENSION]UNLOADED_RADIUS
= 0.322 $Free tyre radius $
WIDTH = 0.18
$Nominal section width of the tyre $RIM_RADIUS
= 0.216 $Nominal rim radius $
RIM_WIDTH = 0.135
$Rim width $$----------------------------------------------------------------shape[SHAPE]radial width1.0 0.00.994 0.2110.975 0.4230.947 0.6340.894 0.8450.841 1.0$------------------------------------------------section_profile_table $ For taking the tire's cross shape into account (optional), max 100 pnts[SECTION_PROFILE_TABLE] x y 0.00000
0.00000000.00300
0.00004680.00600
0.00018770.00900
0.00042350.01200
0.00075610.01500
Adams/Tire
222
0.00118770.01800
0.00172160.02100
0.00236130.02400
0.00311140.02700
0.00397700.03000
0.00496390.03300
0.00607850.03600
0.00732820.03900
0.00872070.04200
0.01026460.04500
0.01196940.04800
0.01384490.05100
0.01590180.05400
0.01815170.05700
0.02060650.06000
0.02327930.06300
0.02618360.06600
0.02933370.06900
0.03274470.07200
0.03643230.07500
0.04041320.07800
0.04470470.08100
0.04932480.08400
0.05429230.08700
0.0596270$------------------------------------------------------------parameter[VERTICAL]VERTICAL_STIFFNESS = 2e+005
$Tyre vertical stiffness $
223Tire Models
VERTICAL_DAMPING = 50 $Tyre vertical damping $
BREFF = 8.4 $Low load stiffness eff. rolling radius $
DREFF = 0.27 $Peak value of eff. rolling radius $
FREFF = 0.07 $High load stiffness eff. rolling radius $
FNOMIN = 1475 $Nominal wheel load
$-----------------------------------------------------------load_curve$ For a non-linear tire vertical stiffness (optional)$ Maximum of 100 points[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen
fz0.000
0.00.001
212.00.002
428.00.003
648.00.005
1100.00.010
2300.00.020
5000.00.030
8100.0$------------------------------------------------------long_slip_range[LONG_SLIP_RANGE]KPUMIN = -1.5
$Minimum valid wheel slip $KPUMAX = 1.5
$Maximum valid wheel slip $$-----------------------------------------------------slip_angle_range[SLIP_ANGLE_RANGE]ALPMIN = -1.5708
$Minimum valid slip angle $ALPMAX = 1.5708
$Maximum valid slip angle $$-----------------------------------------------inclination_slip_range[INCLINATION_ANGLE_RANGE]CAMMIN = -1.0996
$Minimum valid camber angle $CAMMAX = 1.0996
$Maximum valid camber angle $
Adams/Tire
224
$-------------------------------------------------vertical_force_range[VERTICAL_FORCE_RANGE]FZMIN = 73.75
$Minimum allowed wheel load $FZMAX = 3319.5
$Maximum allowed wheel load $$--------------------------------------------------------------scaling[SCALING_COEFFICIENTS]LFZO = 1
$Scale factor of nominal load $LCX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx shape factor $LMUX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx peak friction coefficient $LEX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx curvature factor $LKX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx slip stiffness $LVX = 1
$Scale factor of Fx vertical shift $LGAX = 1
$Scale factor of camber for Fx $LCY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy shape factor $LMUY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy peak friction coefficient $LEY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy curvature factor $LKY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy cornering stiffness $LCC = 1
$Scale factor of camber shape factor $LKC = 1
$Scale factor of camber stiffness (K-factor) $LEC = 1
$Scale factor of camber curvature factor $LHY = 1
$Scale factor of Fy horizontal shift $LGAY = 1
$Scale factor of camber force stiffness $LTR = 1
$Scale factor of Peak of pneumatic trail $LRES = 1
$Scale factor of Peak of residual torque $
225Tire Models
LGAZ = 1 $Scale factor of camber torque
stiffness $LXAL = 1
$Scale factor of alpha influence on Fx $LYKA = 1
$Scale factor of kappa influence on Fy $LVYKA = 1
$Scale factor of kappa induced Fy $LS = 1
$Scale factor of Moment arm of Fx $LSGKP = 1
$Scale factor of Relaxation length of Fx $LSGAL = 1
$Scale factor of Relaxation length of Fy $LGYR = 1
$Scale factor of gyroscopic torque $LMX = 1
Scale factor of overturning couple $LVMX = 1
$Scale factor of Mx vertical shift $LMY = 1
$Scale factor of rolling resistance torque $$---------------------------------------------------------longitudinal[LONGITUDINAL_COEFFICIENTS]PCX1 = 1.7655
$Shape factor Cfx for longitudinal force $PDX1 = 1.2839
$Longitudinal friction Mux at Fznom $PDX2 = -0.0078226
$Variation of friction Mux with load $PDX3 = 0
$Variation of friction Mux with camber $PEX1 = 0.4743
$Longitudinal curvature Efx at Fznom $PEX2 = 9.3873e-005
$Variation of curvature Efx with load $PEX3 = 0.066154
$Variation of curvature Efx with load squared $PEX4 = 0.00011999
$Factor in curvature Efx while driving $PKX1 = 25.383
$Longitudinal slip stiffness Kfx/Fz at Fznom $PKX2 = 1.0978
Adams/Tire
226
$Variation of slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load $PKX3 = 0.19775
$Exponent in slip stiffness Kfx/Fz with load $PVX1 = 2.1675e-005
$Vertical shift Svx/Fz at Fznom $PVX2 = 4.7461e-005
$Variation of shift Svx/Fz with load $RBX1 = 12.084
$Slope factor for combined slip Fx reduction $RBX2 = -8.3959
$Variation of slope Fx reduction with kappa $RBX3 = 2.1971e-009
$Influence of camber on stiffness for Fx combined $RCX1 = 1.0648
$Shape factor for combined slip Fx reduction $REX1 = 0.0028793
$Curvature factor of combined Fx $REX2 = -0.00037777
$Curvature factor of combined Fx with load $RHX1 = 0
$Shift factor for combined slip Fx reduction $PTX1 = 0.83
$Relaxation length SigKap0/Fz at Fznom $PTX2 = 0.42
$Variation of SigKap0/Fz with load $PTX3 = 0.21
$Variation of SigKap0/Fz with exponent of load $$----------------------------------------------------------overturning[OVERTURNING_COEFFICIENTS]QSX1 = 0
$Lateral force induced overturning moment $QSX2 = 0.16056
$Camber induced overturning moment $QSX3 = 0.095298
$Fy induced overturning moment $$--------------------------------------------------------------lateral[LATERAL_COEFFICIENTS]PCY1 = 1.1086
$Shape factor Cfy for lateral forces $PCY2 = 0.66464
$Shape factor Cfc for camber forces $PDY1 = 1.3898
$Lateral friction Muy $PDY2 = -0.0044718
$Exponent lateral friction Muy $
227Tire Models
PDY3 = 0.21428 $Variation of friction Muy with squared
camber $PEY1 = -0.80276
$Lateral curvature Efy at Fznom $PEY2 = 0.89416
$Variation of curvature Efy with camber squared $PEY3 = 0
$Asymmetric curvature Efy at Fznom $PEY4 = 0
$Asymmetric curvature Efy with camber $PEY5 = -2.8159
$Camber curvature Efc $PKY1 = -19.747
$Maximum value of stiffness Kfy/Fznom $PKY2 = 1.3756
$Curvature of stiffness Kfy $PKY3 = 1.3528
$Peak stiffness factor $PKY4 = -1.2481
$Peak stiffness variation with camber squared $PKY5 = 0.3743
$Lateral stiffness depedency with camber squared $PKY6 = -0.91343
$Camber stiffness factor Kfc $PKY7 = 0.2907
$Vertical load dependency of camber stiffn. Kfc $PHY1 = 0
$Horizontal shift Shy at Fznom $RBY1 = 10.694
$Slope factor for combined Fy reduction $RBY2 = 8.9413
$Variation of slope Fy reduction with alpha $RBY3 = 0
$Shift term for alpha in slope Fy reduction $RBY4 = -1.8256e-010
$Influence of camber on stiffness of Fy combined $RCY1 = 1.0521
$Shape factor for combined Fy reduction $REY1 = -0.0027402
$Curvature factor of combined Fy $REY2 = -0.0094269
$Curvature factor of combined Fy with load $RHY1 = -7.864e-005
$Shift factor for combined Fy reduction $RHY2 = -6.9003e-006
$Shift factor for combined Fy reduction with load $
Adams/Tire
228
RVY1 = 0 $Kappa induced side force Svyk/Muy*Fz
at Fznom $RVY2 = 0
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with load $RVY3 = -0.00033208
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with camber $RVY4 = -4.7907e+015
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with alpha $RVY5 = 1.9
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with kappa $RVY6 = -30.082
$Variation of Svyk/Muy*Fz with atan(kappa) $PTY1 = 0.75
$Peak value of relaxation length Sig_alpha $PTY2 = 1
$Shape factor for Sig_alpha $PTY3 = 0.6
$Value of Fz/Fznom where Sig_alpha is maximum $$---------------------------------------------------rolling resistance[ROLLING_COEFFICIENTS]QSY1 = 0.01
$Rolling resistance torque coefficient $QSY2 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on Fx $QSY3 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on speed $QSY4 = 0
$Rolling resistance torque depending on speed^4 $$-------------------------------------------------------------aligning[ALIGNING_COEFFICIENTS]QBZ1 = 9.246
$Trail slope factor for trail Bpt at Fznom $QBZ2 = -1.4442
$Variation of slope Bpt with load $QBZ3 = -1.8323
$Variation of slope Bpt with load squared $QBZ4 = 0
$Variation of slope Bpt with camber $QBZ5 = 0.15703
$Variation of slope Bpt with absolute camber $QBZ9 = 8.3146
$Slope factor Br of residual torque Mzr $QCZ1 = 1.2813
$Shape factor Cpt for pneumatic trail $
229Tire Models
QDZ1 = 0.063288 $Peak trail Dpt = Dpt*(Fz/Fznom*R0) $
QDZ2 = -0.015642 $Variation of peak Dpt with load $
QDZ3 = -0.060347 $Variation of peak Dpt with camber $
QDZ4 = -0.45022 $Variation of peak Dpt with camber squared $
QDZ6 = 0 $Peak residual torque Dmr = Dmr/(Fz*R0)
$QDZ7 = 0 $Variation of peak factor Dmr with load
$QDZ8 = -0.08525
$Variation of peak factor Dmr with camber $QDZ9 = -0.081035
$Variation of peak factor Dmr with camber and load $QDZ10 = 0.030766
$Variation of peak factor Dmr with camber squared $QDZ11 = 0.074309
$Variation of Dmr with camber squared and load $QEZ1 = -3.261
$Trail curvature Ept at Fznom $QEZ2 = 0.63036
$Variation of curvature Ept with load $QEZ3 = 0
$Variation of curvature Ept with load squared $QEZ4 = 0
$Variation of curvature Ept with sign of Alpha-t $QEZ5 = 0
$Variation of Ept with camber and sign Alpha-t $QHZ1 = 0
$Trail horizontal shift Sht at Fznom $QHZ2 = 0
$Variation of shift Sht with load $QHZ3 = 0
$Variation of shift Sht with camber $QHZ4 = 0
$Variation of shift Sht with camber and load $SSZ1 = 0
$Nominal value of s/R0: effect of Fx on Mz $SSZ2 = 0.0033657
$Variation of distance s/R0 with Fy/Fznom $SSZ3 = 0.16833
$Variation of distance s/R0 with camber $SSZ4 = 0.017856
Adams/Tire
230
$Variation of distance s/R0 with load and camber $QTZ1 = 0
$Gyroscopic torque constant $MBELT = 0
$Belt mass of the wheel -kg- $
231Tire Models
521-Tire ModelOverview
The 521-Tire model is a simple model that requires a small set of parameters or experimental data to
simulate the behavior of tires.
This chapter includes the following sections:
• About 521-Tire
• Tire Slip Quantities and Transient Tire Behaviour
• Force Calculations
• Converting Slip Ratio Data to Velocity Data
• Contact Methods
• 521-Tire Tire and Road Property Files
About 521-Tire
The 521-Tire is the first tire model incorporated in Adams. The name “521” (actually “5.2.1”) refers to
the version number of Adams/Tire when it was first released.
The slip forces and moments can be calculated in two ways:
• Using the Equation method
• Using the Interpolation method
Two dedicated contact methods exist for the 521-Tire:
• Point Follower, used for Handling analysis models
• Equivalent Plane Method, used for 3D Contact analysis models
Any combination of force and contact method is allowed.
The road data files used for the 521-Tire are unique and cannot be used in combination with any other
Handling tire model. The 521 road file format is described in Road Data File 521_pnt_follow.rdf.
Note that the capability and generality of the 521-Tire have been superseded by other, newer tire models,
described throughout this guide. We’ve retained the 521-Tire model primarily for backward
compatibility. We recommend that you use other tire models for new work.
Tire Slip Quantities and Transient Tire Behaviour
Definition of Tire Slip QuantitiesSlip Quantities at Combined Cornering and Braking/Traction
Adams/Tire
232
The longitudinal slip velocity Vsx in the SAE-axis system is defined using the longitudinal speed Vx, the
wheel rotational velocity , and the loaded rolling radius Rl:
The lateral slip velocity is equal to the lateral speed in the contact point with respect to the road plane:
The practical slip quantities (longitudinal slip) and (slip angle) are calculated with these slip
velocities in the contact point:
Note that for realistic tire forces the slip angle is limited to 90 degrees and the longitudinal slip in
between -1 (locked wheel) and 1.
Lagged longitudinal and lateral slip quantities (transient tire behavior)In general, the tire rotational speed and lateral slip will change continuously because of the changing
interaction forces in between the tire and the road. Often the tire dynamic response will have an important
role on the overall vehicle response. For modeling this so-called transient tire behavior, a first-order
system is used both for the longitudinal slip as the side slip angle, . Considering the tire belt as a
stretched string, which is supported to the rim with lateral springs, the lateral deflection of the belt can
be estimated (see also reference [1]). The figure below shows a top-view of the string model.
Stretched String Model for Transient Tire Behavior
Ω
Vsx Vz ΩR1–=
Vsy Vy=
κ α
κVsx
Vx
-------- and αtan–Vsy
Vx
---------= =
α κ
κ α
233Tire Models
When rolling, the first point having contact with the road adheres to the road (no sliding assumed).
Therefore, a lateral deflection of the string will arise that depends on the slip angle size and the history
of the lateral deflection of previous points having contact with the road.
For calculating the lateral deflection v1 of the string in the first point of contact with the road, the
following differential equation is valid during braking slip:
with the relaxation length in the lateral direction. The turnslip can be neglected at radii larger than
10 m. This differential equation cannot be used at zero speed, but when multiplying with Vx, the equation
can be transformed to:
When the tire is rolling, the lateral deflection depends on the lateral slip speed; at standstill, the deflection
depends on the relaxation length, which is a measure for the lateral stiffness of the tire. Therefore, with
this approach, the tire is responding to a slip speed when rolling and behaving like a spring at standstill.
A similar approach yields the following for the deflection of the string in longitudinal direction:
Now the practical slip quantities, and are defined based on the tire deformation:
1
Vx
------dv1
dt--------
v1
σ α------+ α( )tan aφ+=
σ α φ
σ α
dv1
dt-------- Vx v1+ σ– κVsx=
σ α
du1
dt-------- Vx u1+ σ– κVsx=
κ′ α′
Adams/Tire
234
These practical slip quantities and are used instead of the usual and definitions for steady-
state tire behavior.
The longitudinal and lateral relaxation length are read from the tire property file, see Tire Property File
521_equation.tir and 521_interpol.tir
Force Calculations
You can use the 521-Tire model for handling and durability analyses.
Directional Vectors for the Application of Tire Forces and Torques at the Center of the Tire-Road
Surface Contact Patch
The forces act along the directional vectors. From the tire spin vector and various information you supply
in the tire property and the road profile data files, Adams/Tire determines the positions and orientations
of the tire vertical, lateral, and longitudinal directional vectors. Figure 3 shows these directional vectors.
The tire vertical force acts along the vertical directional vector, the tire aligning torque acts about the
same vector, the tire lateral force acts along the lateral directional vector, and the tire longitudinal force
acts along the longitudinal directional vector. At this point, Adams/Tire determines the force directions
as if it were going to apply the tire aligning torque and all of the tire forces at the center of the tire-road
surface contact patch.
κ'u1σ κ------ Vx( )sin=
α 'v1σ α------
atan=
κ′ α′ κ α
235Tire Models
The tire-road surface contact patch may deflect laterally. Adams/Tire calculates the lateral deflection in
the direction (and with the sign) of the lateral force. The magnitude of the deflection is equal to the lateral
force divided by the tire lateral stiffness you provide in the tire property data file.
The tire vertical, lateral, and longitudinal forces are forces in the tire vertical, lateral, and longitudinal
directions (as determined at the tire-road surface contact patch). The tire aligning torque is a torque about
the tire vertical vector. The vehicle durability force has components in both the tire vertical and the tire
longitudinal directions.
Normal ForceThe tire normal force Fz is calculated based on the tire deflection and radial velocity. A progressive
spring and linear damping constant are employed:
where Fstiff is tire stiffness force and Fdamp is tire damping force. The vertical stiffness force is calculated
from:
where Kz is the tire vertical stiffness, δ is tire deflection, and is the stiffness exponent. The tire
damping force is calculated from:
where Cz is the tire damping constant.
The damping constant is reduced for small tire deflections, which are below 5% of the unloaded tire
radius.
The tire vertical stiffness can also be described using a spline function (force versus deflection) in the
Adams dataset. The user array is used to switch between tire property file stiffness and spline stiffness.
If the first value in the user array is equal to '5215', the spline vertical stiffness is used. The second value
of the user array refers to the ID of the spline. The message, 'Using spline data for the vertical spring', is
shown in the message file. If the first value in the user array is not equal to '5215', the tire property file
stiffness is used.
The following is an example of using the spline vertical stiffness:
! adams_view_name='spline_vertical_stiffness'SPLINE/10, X = -1,0,10,30, Y = 0,0,2000,6000!! adams_view_name='wheel_user_array'ARRAY/102
Fz Fstiff Fdamp–=
Fstiff Kzδθ
=
θ
Fdamp Cz RadialVelocity×=
Adams/Tire
236
, NUM=5215,10
Another option for having a non-linear tire stiffness is to introduce a deflection-load table in the tire
property file in a section called [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]. See 521-Tire Tire and Road Property
Files on page 20. If a section called [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] exists, the load deflection
datapoints with a cubic spline for inter- and extrapolation are used for the calculation of the vertical force
of the tire.
Longitudinal ForceThe tire longitudinal force Fx can have up to three contributions:
• Traction/braking force
• Rolling resistance force
• Durability force (in case of durability contact)
Traction/Braking Force
Traction force is developed if the vehicle is starting to move and a braking force if the vehicle is
beginning to stop. In either case, the absolute magnitude of the force is calculated from:
where the friction coefficient µ is a function of the longitudinal slip velocity Vsx in the contact patch.
Note that this is somewhat unusual, since all the other Handling tire models in Adams/Tire assume that
the longitudinal force Fx is a function of the slip ratio.
Schematic of Friction Coefficient Versus Local Slip Velocity
Fx µFz=
237Tire Models
The µ curve as a function of longitudinal slip velocity is created using standard Adams STEP functions (see body 4 on page 10). You have to specify two points on the curve to define this characteristic:
• The coordinates of the curve at µstatic: (velocity µstatic, µstatic)
• The coordinates of the curve at µdynamic: (velocity µdynamic, µdynamic)
The friction values may be available to you as function of slip ratio instead of slip velocity. Converting
Slip Ratio Data to Velocity Data on page 16 explains how the slip ratios can be converted to slip
velocities.
Rolling Resistance Force
Rolling resistance Moment My is calculated from:
where coefrr is the rolling resistance coefficient that should be supplied in the tire property data file.
Durability Force
Durability force, sometimes known as radial planar force, is a special kind of tire vertical force. It is the
durability force that resists the action of road bumps. This force acts along the instantaneous vertical
directional vector calculated by Adams/Tire. The Adams/Tire durability tire forces are limited to two-
dimensional forces that lie in the plane of the tire and are directed toward the wheel-center marker.
Adams/Tire superimposes these forces upon any traction or lateral forces developed in the tire-road
surface interaction.
My coefrr Fz⋅=
Adams/Tire
238
You must select the Equivalent Plane Method for generating these durability forces.
Lateral Force and Aligning TorqueTwo methods exist for calculating the lateral force Fy and self-aligning moment Mz:
• Interpolation Method
• Equation Method
Interpolation Method
The AKIMA spline is employed to calculate Fy and Mz as a function of the slip angle α , camber angle γ,
and vertical load Fz. You should provide the data in the SAE axis system.
Note that the slip angle α and vertical load Fz input for the force and moment calculation of Fx, Fy, Mx,
My, and Mz are limited to minimum and maximum values in the input to avoid unrealistic extrapolated
values.
Equation Method
The Equation Method uses the following equation to generate the lateral force Fy:
where Kα denotes the tire cornering stiffness coefficient.
The aligning moment Mz is calculated using the pneumatic trail t according to:
while the pneumatic trails are calculated with half the contact length a:
with R0 and Rl are, respectively, the unloaded and loaded tire radius.
Overturning MomentIn both methods, the overturning moment Mx calculation is based on the lateral tire force Fy, the lateral
tire stiffness Ky, and the vertical load:
Fy µstatFz 1 eKα α–
–( )⋅ sign α( )⋅( )–=
Mz t– Fy⋅=
t1
3--- a e
Kα α–⋅⋅=
a R02
R12
–=
239Tire Models
Tire Lateral Force as a Function of Slip Angle
• The contribution of the camber is disregarded in the Equation Method.
• The cornering stiffness equals .
Combined Slip of 5.2.1The combined slip calculation of the 5.2.1. is using the friction ellipse and is similar to the combined slip
calculation of the Pacejka '89 and '94 tire models.
Inputs:
• Dimensionless longitudinal slip (range -1 to 1) and side slip angle in radians
• Longitudinal force Fx and lateral force Fy calculated using the equations of 521-Tire
• The vertical shift of Fy,a=0 is Fy calculated at zero slip angle
Output:
• Adjusted longitudinal force Fx and lateral force Fy incorporates the reduction due to combined
slip:
•
Friction coefficients:
Mx
FyKy
------= Fz
γ
µstatFzKa–
κ α
βk
k2
α2
sin+
------------------------------
acos=
Adams/Tire
240
Forces corrected for combined slip conditions:
Due to the lateral deflection of the tire patch, the aligning moment under combined slip conditions
increases by the effect of the longitudinal force Fx and the lateral tire stiffness Ky:
and the overturning moment uses the lateral force for combined slip:
SmoothingWhen you indicate smoothing by setting the value of USE_MODE in the tire property file, Adams/Tire
smooths initial transients in the tire force over the first 0.1 seconds of the simulation. The longitudinal
force, lateral force, and aligning torque are multiplied by a cubic step function of time. (See STEP in the
Adams/Solver online help.)
• Longitudinal Force Fx = SFx.
• Lateral Force Fy = SFy
• Overturning moment torque Mx = SMz
• Aligning torque Mz = SMz
Changing the Operating Mode: USE_MODEYou can change the behavior of the tire model by changing the value of USE_MODE in the [MODEL]
section of the tire property file. If USE_MODE equals zero, or when it is absent, the smoothing time
equals 0.001 seconds and the
521-Tire model is compatible with the previous Adams/Solver implementation.
µx act,
Fx
Fz-----= µy act,
Fy Fy α 0=,–
Fz------------------------------=
µx1
1
µx act,-------------
2 βtan
µstat
----------- 2+
----------------------------------------------------= µyβtan
1
µstat
---------- 2 βtan
µy act,-------------
2+
---------------------------------------------------=
Fx comb,
µx
µx act,-------------Fx= Fy comb,
µy
µy act,------------- Fy Fy α 0=,+( )=
Mz comb, Mz pure, Fx comb,+=Fy comb,
Ky
------------------⋅
Mx comb,
Fy comb,
Ky
------------------Fz=
241Tire Models
By selecting a value of USE_MODE between 1 and 4, smoothing and combined slip correction can be
switched on and off, as shown in Table 1. The smoothing time equals 0.1 seconds for these values of
USE-MODE.
Converting Slip Ratio Data to Velocity Data
Adams/Tire requires that you enter the velocities that correspond to µstatic and µdynamic. You will often
obtain this information as the coefficient of friction versus slip ratio. You can calculate the velocities
required by Adams/Tire from the coefficient of friction versus slip ratio curve in the following way:
where:
• = Slip ratio
• = Free rolling rotational velocity (no slip)
• = Actual rotational velocity
Kinematic relationships between translational and rotational velocities and the effective rolling radius
give:
where:
• = Contact patch velocity reletive to road surface
• = Actual longitudinal velocity
• = Effective rolling radius
USE_MODE: Smoothing: Combined slip correction:
1 off off
2 off on
3 on off
4 on on
κωa ωf–
ωf
------------------=
κ
ωf
ωa
ωa
Vx Vsx–
Re
---------------------=
ωf
Vx
Re
------=
Vsx
Vx
Re
Adams/Tire
242
Substituting these relationships into the original slip ratio equation with some cancelling of variables
gives:
Therefore:
During testing for the coefficient of friction as a function of slip ratio, the longitudinal velocity Vx is held
constant. Therefore, you can obtain Vsx, the relative velocity of the contact patch with respect to the road
surface, from the test data curves for the static and dynamic values of friction.
Contact Methods
For handling analyses (which use a flat road surface profile), the 521-Tire model uses the point-follower
contact method. For durability analyses (which use uneven road surface profiles), the Equivalent Plane
Method yields the instantaneous tire radius directly, while finding the new road surface orientation
vector.
About the Point-Follower MethodThe point-follower contact method assumes a single contact point between the tire and road. The contact
point is the point nearest to the wheel center that lies on the line formed by the intersection of the tire
(wheel) plane with the local road plane.
The contact force computed by the point-follower contact method is normal to the road plane. Therefore,
in a simulation of a tire hitting a pothole, the point-follower contact method does not generate the
expected longitudinal force.
About the Equivalent Plane Method 521-Tire uses the Equivalent Plane method to reorient the vertical road surface vector, which gives the
direction of the vertical force, and to calculate the new tire radius. To do this, a new smooth road surface
is generated at an angle calculated such that only the shape of the tire is different (see body 6 on page 18).
Equivalent Plane Method
κVsx
Vx
--------–=
Vsx Vxκ–=
243Tire Models
Both the deflected tire area and its centroid remain unchanged. The vector between the deflected area
centroid and the wheel-center marker then determines the orientation of the. vertical vector
perpendicular to the road surface.
The Equivalent Plane method is best suited for relatively large obstacles because it assumes the tire
encompasses the obstacle uniformly. In reality, the pneumatics and the bending stiffness of the tire
carcass prevent this. The result is an uneven pressure distribution and possibly gaps between the tire and
the road. If the obstacle is larger than the tire contact patch (such as a pothole or curb), the uniform
assumption is good. If the obstacle is much smaller than the tire patch, however (such as a tar strip or
expansion joint), the assumption is poor, and the Equivalent Plane method may greatly underestimate the
durability force.
Definition of Equivalent Plane Parameters
Adams/Tire
244
When using the Equivalent Plane method the following parameters need to be specified in the tire
property file:
Equivalent_plane_angle
Specifies the subtended angle (in degrees) bisected by the z-axis of the wheel-center marker, as shown
in Figure 7. This angle determines the extent of the road the tire can envelop. The value of the
equivalent_plane_angle must be between 0 and 180 degrees.
Equivalent_plane_increments
Specifies the number of increments into which the shadow of the tire subtended section is divided, as
shown in Figure 7.
521-Tire Tire and Road Property Files
This section contains four example input data files. For reference, the files are called:
• 521_equation.tir
• 521_interpol.tir
• 521_pnt_follow.rdf
• 521_equiv_plane.rdf
The first two files are tire property files, and the last two are road files. The file 521_equation.tir
illustrates the required format and parameters when you use the Equation method. The file
521_interpol.tir illustrates the Interpolation method. The two *.rdf files show how road data files must
be specified when either of the contact methods is used.
Tire Property File 521_equation.tir and 521_interpol.tir
You can select the method for calculating the normal force by setting the
VERTICAL_FORCE_METHOD parameter to either POINT_FOLLOWER (for the Point Follower
245Tire Models
method) or EQUIVALENT_PLANE (for the Equivalent Plane method). See Contact Methods on page
17 for details on these methods.
You can select the method for calculating the lateral force by setting the LATERAL_FORCE_METHOD
parameter to either INTERPOLATION or symbol. See Lateral Force and Aligning Torque on page 11
for details on these calculation methods.
The following table specifies how some of the parameter names used in the tire property file correspond
to parameters introduced in the equations that were presented in the previous sections.
521-equation.tir
The 521-equation.tir example tire property file starts here.
$---------------------------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER[MDI_HEADER] FILE_TYPE = 'tir' FILE_VERSION = 3.0 FILE_FORMAT = 'ASCII'(COMMENTS)comment_string'Tire - XXXXXX''Pressure - XXXXXX''Test Date - XXXXXX''Test tire'$--------------------------------------------------------------------------units[UNITS] LENGTH = 'mm'
Parameter in file: Used in equation: As parameter:
vertical_stiffness [10] Kz
vertical_damping [11] Cz
lateral_stiffness [18] Ky
cornering_stiffness_coefficient [6] Kα
Mu_Static Figure 4 µstaticMu_Dynamic Figure 4 µdynamicMu_Static_velocity Figure 4 velocity µstaticMu_Dynamic_Velocity Figure 4 velocity µdynamicrolling_resistance_coefficient [13] coeffrr
vertical_stiffness_exponent [141] Note: If you do not specify vertical_stiffness_exponent in the tire property file, 521-Tire uses the default value of 1.1.
Adams/Tire
246
FORCE = 'newton' ANGLE = 'rad' MASS = 'kg' TIME = 'second'$-------------------------------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]! use mode 12341234! ------------------------------------------------------------------------! smoothingXXXX! combinedXXXX! transient X X X X! PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT = '5.2.1' FUNCTION_NAME = 'TYR913' USE_MODE = 12$---------------------------------------------------------------------dimension[DIMENSION] UNLOADED_RADIUS = 310.0 WIDTH = 195.0 ASPECT_RATIO = 0.70 RIM_RADIUS = 195,0 RIM_WIDTH = 139.7$---------------------------------------------------------------------parameters! VERTICAL_FORCE_METHOD = EQUIVALENT_PLANE LATERAL_FORCE_METHOD = EQUATION! vertical_stiffness = 206.0 vertical_stiffness_exponent = 1.1 vertical_damping = 2.06! lateral_stiffness = 50 cornering_stiffness_coefficient = 50! Mu_Static = 0.95 Mu_Dynamic = 0.75 Mu_Static_Velocity = 3000 Mu_Dynamic_Velocity = 6000! rolling_resistance_coefficient = 0.01! EQUIVALENT_PLANE_ANGLE= 100 EQUIVALENT_PLANE_INCREMENTS= 50! RELAX_LENGTH_X = 0.10 RELAX_LENGTH_Y = 0.30
247Tire Models
521_equation.tir
The 521-interpol.tir example tire property file starts here. In addition to the file for 521_equation.tir, it
contains data that is used for calculating the lateral force and aligning moment, instead of using formula
6 to 9. Note that the [DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE] can also be used in the tire property file for the
Equation method.
$---------------------------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER[MDI_HEADER] FILE_TYPE = 'tir' FILE_VERSION = 3.0 FILE_FORMAT = 'ASCII'
(COMMENTS)comment_string'Tire - XXXXXX''Pressure - XXXXXX''Test Date - XXXXXX''Test tire'$--------------------------------------------------------------------------units[UNITS] LENGTH = 'mm' FORCE = 'newton' ANGLE = 'rad' MASS = 'kg' TIME = 'second'$-------------------------------------------------------------------------model[MODEL]! use mode 12341234! ------------------------------------------------------------------------! smoothingXXXX! combinedXXXX! transient X X X X! PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT = '5.2.1' FUNCTION_NAME = 'TYR913' USE_MODE = 12$---------------------------------------------------------------------dimension[DIMENSION] UNLOADED_RADIUS = 310.0 WIDTH = 195.0 ASPECT_RATIO = 0.70 RIM_RADIUS = 195,0 RIM_WIDTH = 139.7$---------------------------------------------------------------------parameters! VERTICAL_FORCE_METHOD = POINT_FOLLOWER ! or EQUIVALENT_PLANE
Adams/Tire
248
LATERAL_FORCE_METHOD = INTERPOLATION ! or EQUATION! vertical_stiffness = 206.0 vertical_stiffness_exponent = 1.1 vertical_damping = 2.06 lateral_stiffness = 50 cornering_stiffness_coefficient = 50! Mu_Static = 0.95 Mu_Dynamic = 0.75 Mu_Static_Velocity = 3000 Mu_Dynamic_Velocity = 6000! rolling_resistance_coefficient = 0.01! EQUIVALENT_PLANE_ANGLE= 100 EQUIVALENT_PLANE_INCREMENTS= 50!! RELAX_LENGTH_X = 0.10 RELAX_LENGTH_Y = 0.30!------------------CAMBER ANGLE VALUES------------------------------------------! Conversion! No. of pnts factor(D to R) pnt1 pnt2 pnt3 pnt4 pnt5! CAMBER_ANGLE_DATA_LIST 5 0.017453292 -3.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 10.0!!------------------SLIP ANGLE VALUES--------------------------------------------! Conversion! No. of pnts factor(D to R) pnt1 ...... pnt9! SLIP_ANGLE_DATA_LIST 9 0.017453292 -15.0 -10.0 -5.0 -2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 10.0 15.0!!-----------------VERTICAL FORCE VALUES-----------------------------------------! Conversion ! No. of pnts factor! pnt1 pnt2 pnt3 pnt4 pnt5 ! VERTICAL_FORCE_DATA_LIST 5 4.448 200.0 600.0 1100.0 1500.0 1900.0!!-----------------ALLIGNING TORQUE VALUES---------------------------------------! No. of pnts Conversion! factor!
249Tire Models
! pnt1 .... pnt225! ALIGNING_TORQUE_DATA_LIST 225 -1355.7504
5.31 6.52 22.88 26.41 30.58 0.11 2.84 5.49 -3.92 -14.04 0.47 -12.44 -37.99 -67.22 -116.07 0.04 -21.38 -69.04 -111.44 -168.11 0.80 -3.70 -27.94 -44.25 -53.74 1.75 17.43 52.20 81.97 145.78 2.54 11.08 40.53 73.54 95.55 -1.28 0.02 14.82 2.93 10.35 1.59 -3.77 -17.17 6.60 -11.91
0.06 14.23 22.93 11.45 15.74 5.95 5.54 13.72 -1.65 -15.64 -1.29 -9.45 -26.98 -57.25 -107.71 -5.05 -17.73 -62.62 -109.03 -161.88 0.46 -2.48 -19.48 -33.54 -49.52 4.71 26.10 60.80 90.85 119.51 4.26 16.60 52.46 93.32 141.34 2.41 4.28 2.21 9.11 30.44 -0.92 0.22 12.61 2.51 -18.77
0.43 -4.62 15.36 7.16 11.70 6.70 15.92 0.14 -4.20 -11.81 -2.20 -5.53 -13.28 -47.48 -92.88 -1.39 -17.28 -52.17 -102.80 -161.71 2.87 -0.38 -14.27 -29.03 -42.42 6.99 24.54 66.06 93.27 126.38 7.10 18.78 58.20 104.51 156.39 1.63 2.91 8.33 20.32 42.09 -0.78 10.13 -9.94 -13.02 -11.95
5.62 4.36 23.16 38.03 8.73 2.31 6.41 14.10 6.03 -11.66 7.87 1.33 -16.31 -40.24 -82.58 1.40 -10.04 -50.94 -93.06 -157.50 2.10 0.56 -16.15 -27.15 -40.13 5.60 26.48 62.92 90.16 122.03 3.56 20.63 60.74 108.26 162.97 -0.08 1.81 14.39 34.98 59.72 1.38 -2.13 -2.42 -4.08 -2.72
3.69 1.71 29.06 10.05 11.38 3.09 7.15 -7.92 13.53 -5.78 6.08 0.38 -2.69 -32.10 -62.17 0.76 -7.65 -37.28 -89.05 -145.09 0.70 4.37 -7.59 -23.71 -28.49 5.92 34.39 72.55 92.88 129.34 4.36 29.81 76.70 118.91 180.59 -2.03 5.94 26.18 53.59 89.76 0.39 -5.52 -6.06 10.16 7.81
Adams/Tire
250
!-----------------LATERAL FORCE VALUES--------------------------------------- ! No. of pnt Conversion ! factor ! pnt1 .... pnt225 ! LATERAL_FORCE_DATA_LIST 225 4.448 234.08 585.56 1000.29 1307.77 1603.78 269.79 628.82 1040.78 1331.72 1624.83 213.70 565.29 974.49 1198.82 1387.74 150.79 452.18 752.21 885.23 960.13 11.52 50.58 199.87 199.50 208.75 -116.75 -367.42 -618.68 -683.16 -857.81 -224.15 -588.24 -1001.01 -1235.88 -1488.88 -242.08 -612.70 -1059.55 -1344.53 -1658.66 -213.99 -597.29 -988.14 -1343.86 -1689.35
234.40 572.75 981.30 1352.37 1698.90 239.27 647.77 1007.37 1357.22 1666.30 252.34 603.75 1033.50 1288.76 1483.64 167.55 481.45 826.41 962.64 1028.74 32.23 78.77 231.31 250.14 254.32 -122.59 -423.13 -552.58 -613.52 -607.61 -208.93 -576.28 -948.45 -1149.44 -1314.69 -261.05 -634.90 -1064.15 -1338.52 -1581.84 -241.50 -607.16 -1021.87 -1322.30 -1598.25
210.20 578.56 968.72 1344.05 1730.40 237.91 600.60 1025.67 1377.57 1733.03 226.60 629.48 1084.97 1354.12 1575.22 154.74 496.21 878.72 1028.03 1095.59 34.37 74.19 240.00 284.42 283.85 -130.29 -339.00 -509.04 -543.75 -555.05 -226.48 -557.52 -884.91 -1083.18 -1175.12 -270.70 -595.22 -1059.76 -1314.74 -1564.43 -254.64 -602.76 -1032.71 -1313.22 -1609.96
238.28 531.25 945.70 1305.28 1786.96 227.13 594.51 1038.87 1365.33 1733.29 221.76 633.49 1135.31 1375.28 1619.82 195.50 505.90 899.88 1059.92 1135.28 28.51 68.59 241.99 311.15 331.84 -145.10 -319.56 -464.11 -499.27 -500.83 -230.33 -548.99 -815.88 -991.78 -1108.36 -230.62 -597.10 -1009.76 -1261.43 -1504.09 -218.36 -570.13 -1049.72 -1344.94 -1589.60
228.49 564.69 954.06 1332.84 1687.50 221.19 595.52 1019.74 1378.35 1749.40 224.63 590.58 1108.01 1408.87 1707.09 178.96 474.70 918.87 1125.97 1242.75 42.58 65.26 230.69 306.58 428.45
251Tire Models
-144.43 -290.91 -368.02 -398.98 -394.66 -224.99 -494.65 -761.78 -886.03 -941.20 -246.51 -563.13 -980.33 -1249.57 -1462.88 -239.34 -567.10 -1050.56 -1348.66 -1611.11$---------------------------------------------------------------------load_curve$ For a non-linear tire vertical stiffness (optional)$ Maximum of 100 points[DEFLECTION_LOAD_CURVE]pen fz0.0 0.01.0 212.02.0 428.03.0 648.05.0 1100.010.0 2300.020.0 5000.030.0 8100.0
521-Tire Road Data Files
The road data files used with the 521-Tire are unique and cannot be used with any other tire model. The
data files are fully described by the following two examples.
Road Data File 521_pnt_follow.rdf
This example file shows that, if you use the Point Follower method and indicate it in the associated tire
property file, the road_profile_type parameter must be set to FLAT.
1. $-----------------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER
2. FILE_TYPE = ’rdf’
3. FILE_VERSION = 2.0
4. FILE_FORMAT = ’ASCII’
5. (COMMENTS)
6. comment_string
7. ’Example of 521-Tire, point follower flat road’
8. $----------------------------------------------------------------units
9. [UNITS]
10. LENGTH = ’mm’
11. FORCE = ’newton’
12. ANGLE = ’radians’
13. MASS = ’kg’
14. TIME = ’sec’
15. $-----------------------------------------------------------definition
Adams/Tire
252
16. [MODEL]
17. METHOD = ’5.2.1’
18. $-----------------------------------------------------------parameters
19. road_profile_type = FLAT
20. initial_height = 0
21. Road Data File 521_equiv_plane.rdf
The following example shows which data the road data file must contain if the Equivalent Plane method
is used and specified in the associated tire property file. The main difference with the road data file used
in association with the Point Follower method is that here the ROAD_PROFILE_TYPE parameter is set
to INPUT and a ROAD_INPUT_DATA_LIST is specified.
22. $---------------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER
23. FILE_TYPE = ’rdf’
24. FILE_VERSION = 2.0
25. FILE_FORMAT = ’ASCII’
26. (COMMENTS)
27. comment_string
28. ’Example of 521-Tire, equivalent plane method 2-D road’
29. $--------------------------------------------------------------units
30. [UNITS]
31. LENGTH = ’mm’
32. FORCE = ’newton’
33. ANGLE = ’radians’
34. MASS = ’kg’
35. TIME = ’sec’
36. $---------------------------------------------------------definition
37. [MODEL]
38. METHOD = ’5.2.1’
39. $---------------------------------------------------------parameters
40. ROAD_PROFILE_TYPE = INPUT ! or FLAT
41. INITIAL_HEIGHT = 0.000
42. !
43. ! if "ROAD_PROFILE_TYPE = INPUT" the road must be specified with a table
44. !
45. ROAD_INPUT_DATA_LIST
46. 23, 1
253Tire Models
47. -10000.00, 0.00
48. 1740.00, 0.00
49. 1740.94, 1.92
50. (.... a number of columns were removed here for clarity)
51. 1892.40, 0.00
52. 40000.00, 0.00
Adams/Tire
254
Using FTire Tire ModelLearn about:
• About FTire
• Modeling Approach
• Using FTire with Road Models
• Using FTire with Adams
• Parameters
• About FTire Parameters
• Procedure for Parameterizing FTire
• List of FTire Parameters
• About the Tire Data File
• Choosing Operating Conditions
This help describes the Flexible Ring Tire Model (FTire)™, as it is invoked from Adams.
© Michael Gipser, Cosin Consulting
About FTireThe tire model, FTire (Flexible ring tire model), is a sophisticated tire force element. You can use it in
MBS-models for vehicle-ride comfort investigations and other vehicle dynamics simulations on even or
uneven roadways.
255Tire Models
The main benefits of FTire are:
• Fully nonlinear.
• Valid in frequency domain up to 120 Hz, and beyond.
• Valid for obstacle wave lengths up to half the length of the contact patch, and less.
• Parameters, among others, are the natural frequencies and damping factors of the linearized
model, and easy-to-obtain global static properties.
• Models both the in-plane and out-of-plane forces and moments.
• Computational effort no more than 5 to 20 times real time, depending on platform and model
level.
• High accuracy when passing single obstacles, such as cleats and potholes.
• Applicable in extreme situations like many kinds of tire misuse and sudden pressure loss.
• Sufficiently accurate in predicting steady-state tire characteristics.
In contrast to other tire models, FTire does not need any complicated road data preprocessing. Rather, it
takes and resolves road irregularities, and even extremely high and sharp-edged obstacles, just as they
are defined.
We recommend that you visit www.ftire.com, to learn more about FTire theory, validation, data supply,
and application. Also, at the FTire Web site, you will be kept informed about the latest FTire
improvements, and how to receive them. In the download section, you will find a set of auxiliary
programs, called FTire/tools for Windows™. These tools help to analyze and parameterize an FTire
Adams/Tire
256
Model. FTire/tools is free for FTire licensees. It comprises static, steady-date, and modal analysis,
linearization, data estimation, identification and validation tools, road data visualization, and more. In the
site's documentation section, you will find a more detailed and permanently updated FTire
documentation, together with as some additional literature.
Modeling ApproachFTire uses the following modeling approach:
• The tire belt is described as an extensible and flexible ring carrying bending stiffnesses,
elastically founded on the rim by distributed, partially dynamic stiffnesses in radial, tangential,
and lateral directions. The degrees of freedom of the ring are such that rim in-plane as well as
out-of-plane movements are possible. The ring is numerically approximated by a finite number
of discrete masses, the belt elements. These belt elements are coupled with their direct neighbors
by stiff springs and by bending stiffnesses both in-plane and out-of-plane.
Belt In-Plane and Out-Of-Plane Bending Stiffness outlines in-plane and out-of-plane bending
stiffness placing. In-plane bending stiffness is realized by means of torsional springs about the
lateral axis. The torsional deflection of these springs is determined by the angle between three
consecutive belt elements, projected onto the rim mid-plane. Similarly, the out-of-plane bending
stiffness is described by means of torsional springs about the radial axis. Here, the torsional
deflection is determined by the angle between three consecutive belt elements, projected onto the
belt tangential plane. Note that in the figure, the yellow plates do not represent the belt elements
themselves, but rather the connecting lines between the elements.
Belt In-Plane (left) and Out-Of-Plane (right) Bending Stiffness
• FTire calculates all stiffnesses, bending stiffnesses, and damping factors during preprocessing,
fitting the prescribed modal properties (see list of data below).
257Tire Models
• A number of massless tread blocks (5 to 50, for example) are associated with every belt element.
These blocks carry nonlinear stiffness and damping properties in the radial, tangential, and
lateral direction. The radial deflections of the blocks depend on the road profile, focus, and
orientation of the associated belt elements. FTire determines tangential and lateral deflections
using the sliding velocity on the ground and the local values of the sliding coefficient. The latter
depends on ground pressure and sliding velocity.
• FTire calculates all six components of tire forces and moments acting on the rim by integrating
the forces in the elastic foundation of the belt.
Because of this modeling approach, the resulting overall tire model is accurate up to relatively high
frequencies both in longitudinal and in lateral directions. There are few restrictions in its applicability
with respect to longitudinal, lateral, and vertical vehicle dynamics situations. FTire deals with large-
and/or short-wave-length obstacles. It works out of, and up to, a complete standstill, with no additional
computing effort nor any model switching. Finally, it is applicable with high accuracy in such delicate
simulations as ABS braking on extremely uneven roadways, and so on.
In a full 3D variant, FTire additionally takes into account belt element rotation and bending about the
circumferential axis. These new degrees of freedom enable FTire to use contact elements that are
distributed not only along a single line, but over the whole contact patch. You can choose the
arrangement of the contact elements to be either randomly distributed, or distributed along several
parallel lines.
In the full 3D variant, belt torsion about the circumferential axis is described by:
• Torsional stiffnesses between belt elements and rim, about circumferential axis (represented by
red torsion springs in the left side of the figure, Belt).
• Torsional stiffnesses between adjacent belt elements, about circumferential axis (represented by
blue torsion springs in the left side of figure, Belt).
The right side of the figure, Belt outlines the belt bending stiffness about the circumferential axis. This
is done in a somewhat simplified manner. Actually, lateral belt bending is taken into account by
introducing a parabolic shape function for each belt element. The curvature of this shape function is
treated as a belt elements’ additional degree of freedom.
Belt Torsional and Twisting Stiffness, and Belt Lateral Bending Stiffness
Note: Radial, tangential, and lateral are relative to the orientation of the belt element,
whereas sliding velocity is the block end-point velocity projected onto the road
profile tangent plane. By polynomial interpolation, certain precautions have been
taken not to let the ground pressure distribution mirror the polygonal shape of the
belt chain.
Adams/Tire
258
You should chose the full 3D variant, which takes about 30% more computing time, in situations where
a considerable excitation of tire vibrations in lateral direction is expected. This, for example, will happen
when the tire runs over cleats that are placed in an oblique direction relative to the tire rolling direction.
Similarly, such an excitation will happen when the tire is running over obstacles with large camber angle.
Optionally, FTire can take into account tire non-uniformity, that is, a harmonic variation of vertical or
longitudinal stiffness, as well as static and dynamic imbalance, conicity, ply-steer, and geometrical run-
out.
All stiffness values may depend on the actual inflation pressure. To take full advantage of that option, it
is necessary to provide basic FTire input data, such as radial stiffness data and natural frequencies at two
different pressure values. Actual inflation pressure is one of the ‘operating conditions variables,’ which
can be made time-dependent, and therefore, can be changed even during a simulation.
There are two more operating conditions: tread depth and model level. The latter signal allows you to
switch between the reduced variant of FTire (all contact elements are arranged in one single line near the
rim mid-plane), and the full 3D variant (contact elements cover the whole contact patch).
The kernel of the FTire implementation is an implicit integration algorithm (BDF) that calculates the belt
shape. The integrator runs parallel but synchronized with the Adams main integrator. By using this
specialized implicit BDF integrator, you can choose the belt extensibility so it is extremely small. This
also allows the simulation of an inextensible belt without any numerical drawbacks.
Using FTire with Road ModelsFTire supports all MSC road definitions, including Motorsports and all 3D roads. It also supports several
customer-specific and third-party roads. For more information about available road descriptions, please
contact info@ftire.com.
259Tire Models
Using FTire with AdamsFTire is a high-resolution tire model, with respect to road irregularities and tire vibration modes. To take
full advantage of that precision, we recommend that you choose a small step size for the Adams
integrator. There should be a minimum of 1,000 steps per one second simulation time (that is, an output
time step of 1 ms or less).
Controlling integrator step size in:
• Adams/Car
• Adams/Chassis
• Adams/View
• Adams/Solver
Controlling Integrator Step Size in Adams/Car
In Adams/Car, you can control the integrator step size by selecting:
Settings → Solver → Dynamics
and entering 1ms in the Hmax text box.
Alternatively, you can edit the driver control file (.dcf) that Adams/Car automatically generates when
performing a new dynamic maneuver. In that file, override the integrator step size, which is defined in
[EXPERIMENT] block, by entering the value 0.001 or less. After editing the file, you can launch
subsequent simulation experiments with the same driver's control (and, of course, the new integrator step
size) by selecting the following from Adams/Car:
Simulate → Full-Vehicle Analysis → DCF Driven → Driver Control Files → Browse
and selecting the .dcf you just edited.
Controlling Integrator Step Size in Adams/Chassis
In Adams/Chassis, you can control the integrator step size by setting the HMAX value to 0.001 or less.
HMAX is defined by selecting the following from Adams/Chassis:
System file → Properties → system_parameters → solver → hmax
Controlling Integrator Step Size in Adams/View
In Adams/View, you can control the integrator step size by checking:
Settings → Solver → Dynamics → Customized Settings
size, Min Step Size, and Max Step Size.
Controlling Integrator Step Size in Adams/Solver
In Adams/Solver, you can control the integrator step size by setting INTEGRATOR/HMAX to the
desired value in the Adams dataset (adm).
Adams/Tire
260
FTire Parameters• About FTire Parameters
• Procedure for Parameterizing FTire
• Listing of FTire Parameters
About FTire ParametersFTire parameters can be divided into several groups. There are parameters that define:
• Tire size and geometry
• Stiffness, damping, and mass distribution of the belt/sidewall structure
• Tire imperfections (non-uniformity, imbalance, conicity, and so on)
• Stiffness and damping properties of the tread rubber
• Friction characteristics of the tread rubber
• Numerical properties of the model
For convenience, FTire tries to use data that can be measured as easy as possible. As a consequence, the
number of basic data might be larger than the number of internal parameters defined by these basic
parameters.
For example, the following four parameters together, after preprocessing, actually result in only two
values used in FTire: compression and shear stiffness of the idealized blocks that represent tread rubber:
• tread_depth
• tread_base_height
• stiffness_tread_rubber
• tread_positive
Also, sometimes different combinations of parameters are possible. This is true especially for data of the
second group, which determine the structural stiffness and damping properties of FTire. Your choice of
which combination of parameters to supply depends on the types of measurements that are available and
their accuracy.
Moreover, it is possible to prescribe over-determined subsets of parameters. For example, you may define
the belt in-plane bending stiffness by prescribing the frequency of the first bending mode, and at the same
time the radial stiffness on a transversal cleat. Both parameters are strongly influenced by the bending
stiffness, but might contradict each other.
In such a case, FTire automatically recognizes that the system of equations to be solved is over-
determined, and applies an appropriate solver (Householder QR factorization) to determine the solution
in the sense of least squares fit. That means, FTire is looking for a compromise to meet both conditions
as much as possible. Users can control the compromise by optionally defining weights for the
contradicting conditions.
261Tire Models
Note that, among others, FTire uses modal data to calculate internal structural stiffness and damping
coefficients. They are processed in such a way that the mathematical model, for small excitations, shows
exactly the measured behavior in the frequency domain. FTire is not a modal model, nor is it linear.
First Six Vibration Modes Of An Unloaded Tire With Fixed Rim
When parametrizing FTire, the bending mode frequencies rather sensitively influence the respective
bending stiffness. As an alternative, determining the radial stiffness both on a flat surface and on a short
obstacle (cleat) is an inexpensive and very accurate way to get both the vertical stiffness between belt
nodes and rim and the in-plane bending stiffness.
Other ways to determine the bending stiffness (and other data, as well) are to use the software tools
FTire/fit (time- and frequency-domain parameter identification) and FTire/estim (qualified parameter
estimation by comparison with a reference tire). For more information, see www.ftire.com.
Unfortunately, there is no direct analogy of the ‘radial stiffness on cleat’ measuring procedure to get the
out-of-plane bending stiffness. But this parameter does not seem to be as relevant as the in-plane bending
stiffness for ride comfort and durability. An indirect, but also very accurate, way to validate the out-of-
plane bending stiffness is to check resulting side-force and self-aligning characteristic. The cornering
stiffness, the pneumatic trail, as well as the difference between maximum side force and side force for
very large side-slip angles, are very sensitively determined both by the tread rubber friction characteristic
and by the out-of-plane bending stiffness. Similarly, the fourth mode (see figure, First Six Vibration
Modes Of An Unloaded Tire With Fixed Rim), being itself determined by the stiffness between belt nodes
and rim in lateral direction, very strongly influences the side-slip angle where maximum side force
occurs.
Procedure for Parameterizing FTireA typical procedure to parametrize FTire might be:
1. Either from tire data sheets, by some simple and inexpensive measurements, or directly from the
tire supplier, obtain:
• Tire size, load index, and speed symbol
• Rolling circumference
• Rim diameter
• Tread width
• Tire mass
Adams/Tire
262
• Tread depth
• Rubber height over steel belt
• Shore-A stiffness or Young's modulus of tread rubber
• Tread pattern positive
2. Determine the natural frequencies and damping moduli of the first six modes, for an unloaded,
inflated tire, where the rim is fixed. Normally, you do this by exciting the tire structure with an
impulse hammer, measuring the time histories of at least four acceleration sensors in all three
directions, distributed along the tire circumference, and processing these using an FFT signal
analyzer. Optionally, repeat this step for a second inflation pressure value.
3. Determine the tire radial stiffness on a flat surface and on a short obstacle, for one or two inflation
pressure value(s).
4. Determine (or estimate) the lateral belt curvature radius from the unloaded tire's cross-section.
Determine the belt lateral bending stiffness to get a reasonable pressure distribution in the lateral
direction.
5. Determine (or estimate) tread rubber adhesion and sliding friction coefficients for ground
pressure values 0.5 bar, 2 bar, and 10 bar.
6. Take natural frequencies and damping moduli of modes 1, 2, and 4, together with the radial
stiffness on flat surface and on a cleat, for one or two inflation pressure value(s), as well as the
remaining basic data. These values result in a first, complete FTire input file for the basic variant
(belt circumferential rotation, twisting, and bending not taken in to account; all contact elements
are arranged in one line).
7. Let FTire preprocess these data. Compare the resulting additional modal properties of the model
with the modal data that are not used so far (modes 3, 5, and 6). If necessary, adjust the
preprocessed data to find a compromise with respect to accuracy.
8. If respective measurements are available, validate the data determined so far by means of side
force and aligning torque characteristics, and by measurements of vertical and longitudinal
force variations induced during rolling over cleats both with low and high speed. The validation
can be extended to a full parameter fitting procedure by using TIRE/fit, as mentioned earlier.
9. Estimate the following additional data that are only relevant for 'out-of-plane' excitation:
• Belt element torsional stiffness relative to rim (represented by red torsion springs between
yellow belt elements and gray rim in the figure, Belt)
• Belt twisting stiffness (represented by blue torsion springs between adjacent yellow belt
elements in the figure, Belt)
• Belt bending stiffness/damping about circumferential direction
• Belt lateral curvature radius
• Coupling coefficient between belt lateral displacement and belt rotation.
Start with the respective values of the sample data file. Then, adjust the values by fitting the model's
response to obliquely oriented cleats and handling characteristics for large camber angles at the same
time. This identification procedure can be made easier by using the the additional tool FTire/fit.
263Tire Models
Clearly, the performance of this procedure is not very easy in practice. On the other hand, every tire
model that is accurate enough for ride comfort and durability calculations will need as much or even
more data.
List of FTire ParametersThe following is a comprehensive list of all mandatory and optional FTire parameters. However, many
items are explained in greater detail in the extended documentation to be downloaded from the restricted
area in www.ftire.com. You will receive your pass-code from info@ftire.com.
FTIRE_DATA Section Parameters
The parameter: Means:
tire_section_width Tire section width as specified in the tire
size designation (using length unit as
specified in the [UNITS] section).
tire_aspect_ratio Tire aspect ratio as specified in the tire size
designation. Unit is %.
rim_diameter Rim diameter as specified in the tire size
designation (using length unit as specified
in the [UNITS] section).
rim_width Inner distance between the two rim flanges.
load_index Load index of tire, as displayed in tire
service description.
tread_width Width of tread that comes into contact with
the road under normal running conditions
at LI load, without camber angle.
rolling_circumference Rolling circumference of tire under the
following running conditions:
Free rolling at v = 60 km/h and zero camber
angle
Vertically loaded by half of the maximum
load
The circumference is the distance traveled
with one complete wheel revolution.
tire_mass Overall tire mass.
inflation_pressure Inflation pressure, at which tire data
measurements have been taken.
Adams/Tire
264
inflation_pressure_2 Second inflation pressure, at which tire data
measurements have been taken (optional).
stat_wheel_load_at_10mm_defl Static wheel load of the inflated tire, when
it is deflected by 10 mm, with zero camber
angle, on a flat surface, during stand-still, at
very low friction value.
stat_wheel_load_at_20mm_defl Static wheel load of the inflated tire, when
it is deflected by 20 mm, with zero camber
angle, on a flat surface, during stand-still, at
very low friction value.
Note: Instead of using:
stat_wheel_load_at_10mm_defl and stat_wheel_load_at_20mm_defl
Note: You can equally define:
stat_wheel_load_at_20mm_defl and stat_wheel_load_at_40mm_defl.
Note: This will better fit typical operating conditions of truck tires. For extremely heavy vehicles, there are even more pairs of deflection values predefined. These can be found at the extended documentation at www.ftire.com.
dynamical_stiffening Increase of the overall radial stiffness at
high speed as compared to radial stiffness
during standstill. Unit is %.
speed_at_half_dyn_stiffening Running speed at which dynamic stiffening
reaches half of the final value.
belt_extension_at_200_kmh Percentage of rolling circumference growth
at a running speed of 200 km/h = 55.55 m/s
= 124.3 mph, compared to low speed.
interior_volume Interior tire volume when the tire is
mounted on the rim and inflated with
inflation_pressure.
Note: This parameter is only needed if you specify the next parameter (volume_gradient) and it is nonzero.
The parameter: Means:
265Tire Models
volume_gradient Relative decrease in volume, of a small tire
segment, when that segment is deflected
vertically.
Note: This parameter is optional and only marginally affects the model’s behavior.
rel_long_belt_memb_tension The percentage by which inflation pressure
forces in the belt region are compensated
with membrane tension in longitudinal
direction, as compared to the total
compensation in lateral and longitudinal
direction.
Note: This parameter is optional, and can only be calculated using a finite-element (FE) model, or estimated by parameter identification. A value of 70 to 80% seems to be appropriate for many tires. The value will increase with increasing belt lateral curvature radius.
f1 First natural frequency: in-plane, rigid-
body rotation around wheel spin axis. Rim
is fixed. See the figure, First Six Vibration
Modes.
f2 Second natural frequency: rigid-body
movement in fore-aft direction. Rim is
fixed. See the figure, First Six Vibration
Modes.
f4 Fourth natural frequency: out-of-plane,
rigid-body rotation around road normal
axis. Rim is fixed. See the figure, First Six
Vibration Modes.
Note: f3 (out-of-plane, rigid-body movement) is not needed because it is closely related to f4.
At least one of:
f5 Fifth natural frequency: first in-plane
bending mode (quadrilateral-shaped). Rim
is fixed.
The parameter: Means:
Adams/Tire
266
belt_in_plane_bend_stiffn In-plane bending stiffness of the belt ring of
deflated and unloaded tire.
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_cleat Static wheel load of the inflated tire, when
it is deflected by 10 mm, with zero camber
angle, on a cleat as specified below, during
stand-still. Cleat must be high enough that
the tire does not touch the ground apart
from the cleat. The cleat is oriented in the
lateral direction, perpendicular to the tire’s
rolling direction.
Note: For truck tires, you can specify wheel_load_at_20_mm_defl_ cleat, as well.
weight_f5
weight_in_plane_bend_stiffn
weight_wheel_load_cleat
If you provide at least two of the data on the
previous page to define the in-plane
bending stiffness, they constitute an over-
determined system of equations for the
respective FTire's internal stiffness values.
FTire will try to find a compromise. You
can control this compromise by setting
these weight values. Their relative size
controls, in a least-squares approach, the
contribution of the respective parameter. If
a weight is set to zero, the related parameter
is completely ignored.
Note: The weights are optional. Default value is 1.
cleat_width Width of cleat that was used to determine
all parameters that require a cleat:
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_ cleat
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_ cl_lo
and so on.
Note: Parameter is optional. Default value is 20 mm.
The parameter: Means:
267Tire Models
cleat_bevel_edge_width Bevel edge width (measured after
projection to x-y-plane) of cleat that was
used to determine all parameters that
require a cleat:
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_ cleat
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_ cl_lo
and so on.
Note: Parameter is optional. Default value is 0 mm.
At least one of:
f6 Sixth natural frequency: first out-of-plane
bending mode (banana-shaped).
belt_out_of_plane_bend_stiffn Out-of-plane bending stiffness of the belt
ring of inflated but unloaded tire.
weight_f6
weight_out_of_plane_bend_st
If you provide both data above (f6 and
belt_out_of_plane_bend_stiff) to define the
out-of-plane bending stiffness, they
constitute an over-determined system of
equations for the respective FTire's internal
stiffness values. FTire will try to find a
compromise. You can control the
compromise by setting these weight values.
Their relative size controls, in a least-
squares approach, the contribution of the
respective parameter. If a weight is set to
zero, the related parameter is completely
ignored.
Note: The weights are optional. Default value is 1.
D1 Damping of f1, between 0 and 1:
0 = undamped, ..., 1 = aperiodic limit case
D2 Damping of f2.
D4 Damping of f4.
Note: D5 and D6 cannot be prescribed, but result from D1, D2, and D4.
The parameter: Means:
Adams/Tire
268
belt_twist_stiffn Belt-twisting stiffness: if the mean torsion
angle relative to the rim is 0, the value is the
moment in longitudinal direction per 1
degree twist angle for a unit length belt
segment. This value is independent on the
number of belt segments.
Note: Only needed for full 3D variant. Unit is force*length2/angle.
belt_torsion_stiffn Belt-torsional stiffness: if twist angle is 0,
the value is the moment in longitudinal
direction per 1 degree torsion angle relative
to rim, for a unit-length belt segment. This
value is independent on the number of belt
segments.
Note: Only needed for full 3D variant.Unit is force/angle.
belt_torsion_lat_displ_coupl If belt twist angle is 0, value is the
kinematic belt torsion angle at 1 mm lateral
belt displacement.
Note: Optional, and only needed for full 3D variant. Unit is angle/length. Default value is 0.
belt_lat_curvature_radius Curvature radius of belt cross section
perpendicular to mid-plane.
Note: Optional, and only needed for full 3D variant. Default value is (nearly) infinity.
belt_lat_bend_stiffn Bending stiffness of belt elements about
circumferential direction.
Note: Optional, and only needed for full 3D variant. Unit is force*length2. Default value is (nearly) infinity.
The parameter: Means:
269Tire Models
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_lo_cl Wheel load at 10 mm deflection on
longitudinal cleat. Static wheel load of the
inflated tire, when it is deflected by 10 mm,
with zero camber angle, on a cleat as
specified above, during stand-still. Cleat
must be high enough that the tire does not
touch the ground apart from the cleat. The
cleat is oriented in longitudinal direction,
along foot-print centerline.
Note: This parameter is optional and you can specify it instead of, or in addition to, belt_lat_bend_stiffn. For truck tires, if you specify wheel_load_at_40_mm, FTire looks for wheel_load_at_20_mm_defl_ lo_cl instead.
weight_lat_bend_st
weight_wheel_load_lo_cl
If you provide both data on the previous
page (belt_lat_bend_stiffn and
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_lo_cl) to
define the lateral belt bending stiffness,
they constitute an over-determined system
of equations for the respective FTire's
internal stiffness values. FTire will try to
find a compromise. You can control the
compromise by setting these weight values.
Their relative size controls, in a least-
squares approach, the contribution of the
related parameter. If a weight is set to zero,
the respective parameter is completely
ignored.
Note: The weights are optional. Default value is 1.
belt_lat_bend_damp Quotient of bending damping and bending
stiffness of belt elements about
circumferential direction.
Note: Optional, and only needed for full 3D variant. Unit is time. Default value is 1 ms.
The parameter: Means:
Adams/Tire
270
f1_p2
f2_p2
f4_p2
f5_p2
f6_p2
D1_p2
D2_p2
D4_p2
belt_in_plane_bend_st_p2
wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_cl_p2
wheel_load_at_20_mm_defl_cl_p2
belt_out_of_plane_bend_st_p2
belt_lat_bend_stiffn_p2
belt_twist_st_p2
belt_torsion_st_p2
If measurements for a second inflation
pressure (inflation_pressure_2) are
available, these are the respective values of
the following taken at that pressure:
• f1
• f2
• f4
• f5
• f6
• D1
• D2
• D4
• belt_in_plane_bend_stiffn
• wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl_cleat
• wheel_load_at_20_mm_defl_cleat
• belt_out_of_plane_bend_stiffn
• belt_lat_bend_stiffn
• belt_twist_stiffn
• belt_torsion_stiffn
Note: These data are optional.
tread_depth Mean groove depth in tread.
tread_base_height Rubber height over steel belt for zero tread
depth, which is the distance between steel
belt and grooves.
stiffness_tread_rubber Stiffness of tread rubber in Shore-A units.
tread_positive Percentage of gross tread contact area with
respect to overall footprint area (tread
pattern positive).
The parameter: Means:
271Tire Models
damping_tread_rubber Quotient of tread rubber damping modulus
and tread rubber elasticity modulus.
Note: Deflection/force phase-lag of elastomers is often assumed to be independent of excitation frequency. This behavior is not yet implemented in FTire; instead, viscous damping is used. The parameter damping_tread_rubber is nothing but the quotient of damper coefficient and spring stiffness of the coupling of blocks and belt. For that reason, the parameter carries the unit time.
sliding_velocity The sliding velocity of a tread rubber block,
when its friction coefficient reaches the
my_sliding values.
blocking_velocity The sliding velocity of a tread rubber block,
when its friction coefficient reaches the
my_blocking values.
low_ground_pressure The first of three ground-pressure values
that defines the pressure dependency of the
friction coefficient. Default value is 0.1 bar.
med_ground_pressure The second of three ground-pressure values
that defines the pressure dependency of the
friction coefficient. Default value is 2 bar.
high_ground_pressure The third of three ground-pressure values
that defines the pressure dependency of the
friction coefficient. Default value is 10 bar.
my_adhesion_at_low_p Coefficient of adhesion friction (which is
equal to static friction) between tread
rubber and road, at first ground pressure
value.
Note: For this parameter and the parameters in the following eight rows, you can still use the parameter names my_..._at_..._bar, used in the previous FTire version. To avoid confusion with the actual ground pressure values, however, we recommend you use the more general names.
The parameter: Means:
Adams/Tire
272
my_sliding_at_low_p Coefficient of sliding friction, at a sliding
velocity defined by parameter
sliding_velocity, between tread rubber and
road, at first ground pressure value.
my_blocking_at_low_p Coefficient of sliding friction, at a sliding
velocity defined by parameter
blocking_velocity, between tread rubber
and road, at first ground pressure value.
my_adhesion_at_med_p Coefficient of adhesion friction (which is
equal to static friction) between tread
rubber and road, at second ground pressure
value.
my_sliding_at_med_p Coefficient of sliding friction, at a sliding
velocity defined by parameter
sliding_velocity, between tread rubber and
road, at second ground pressure value.
static_balance_weight Weight that would have put up on the rim
horn for static balancing.
Note: Parameter is optional.
static_balance_ang_position The angular position at the rim where the
static balance weight would have been
placed.
Note: Parameter is optional.
dynamic_balance_weight One of the two equal weights that would
have been placed on the rim outer and inner
horns for dynamic balancing.
Note: Parameter is optional.
dynamic_balance_ang_position The angular position at the rim where the
left dynamic balance weight would have
been placed.
Note: This parameter is optional.
radial_non_uniformity Amplitude of the harmonic radial stiffness
variation as percentage of the mean radial
stiffness.
Note: Parameter is optional.
radial_non_unif_ang_position Angular position where radial stiffness
reaches its maximum.
Note: This parameter is optional.
The parameter: Means:
273Tire Models
tang_non_uniformity Amplitude of the harmonic tangential
stiffness variation as percentage of the
mean tangential stiffness.
Note: Parameter is optional.
tang_non_unif_ang_position Angular position where tangential stiffness
reaches its maximum.
Note: Parameter is optional.
conicity Small rotation angle of belt elements at
zero moment, about circumferential axis,
resulting in a conical shape of the unloaded
belt.
Note: Parameter is optional and can only be used with the full 3D variant. Nonzero conicity will cause a small side-force without side-slip angle. The sign of that force is independent of the tire’s rolling direction.
ply_steer_percentage Percentage of lateral belt displacement
relative to radial belt displacement, when a
radial force is applied.
Note: Ply-steer, besides conicity, is one of the reasons for nonzero side forces at zero side-slip angle. In contrast to the conicity side-force, this residual side force changes sign when the tire rolling direction is reversed.
run_out The maximum deviation of the local tire
radius from the mean tire radius. Run-out is
assumed to be a harmonic function of the
angular position.
run_out_ang_position The angular belt element position relative
to the rim, where maximum run-out occurs.
number_belt_segments Number of numerical belt segments.
Maximum value is 200, but can be changed
upon request.
number_blocks_per_belt_segm Number of numerical blocks (= contact
elements) per belt segment. Maximum
value is 50, but can be changed upon
request.
The parameter: Means:
Adams/Tire
274
number_tread_strips Number of strips, into which the contact
points are arranged in the full 3D variant,
using an equal spacing.
Note: If value is greater than or equal to 1000, the contact points are scattered randomly over the tread. Alternatively, it is possible to place tread elements according to the actual tread pattern of the tire. This is done by specifying a bitmap file of the footprint. For more information, see the extended documentation at www.ftire.com.
If you specify neither number_tread_strips nor the bitmap file, FTire uses the basic FTire variant instead of the full 3D variant, regardless of the model-level specification in the operating_conditions section.
maximum_time_step Maximum integration time step allowed.
Note: You can call FTire with very large time steps (if this makes sense for your model). Internally, FTire uses multi-step integration with an internal time step that is chosen on basis of maximum_time_step. This internal time step is kept constant if the external time step does not change.
Changing the external time step can result in considerable longer computation time, because certain time-consuming preprocessing calculations have to be repeated. For that reason, you should avoid changing the external time step whenever possible.
The parameter: Means:
275Tire Models
About the FTire Tire Data FileAs with all TeimOrbit files, entries in the [UNITS] block define the physical units of all parameters.
The basic parameters are preprocessed during initialization, resulting in the preprocessed parameters.
These parameters are saved in a separate TeimOrbit-style file, which can be used in further simulations
instead of the basic data file. By this, you can omit the preprocessing calculation phase, which may result
in a considerable saving of time.
This preprocessed data file is a copy of the original one; the preprocessed data are appended after the
bottom line, using a hexadecimal, space-saving coding. In contrast to earlier versions of FTire, it is
possible to use this file for parameter changes instead of the original one.
You should, of course, not change the hexadecimal data but only the readable part of the file. The
hexadecimal section does not only contain the preprocessed data, but a copy of the original one, as well.
Moreover, it carries coded information about the FTire version that was used for creation.
This information helps to automatically determine whether or not an update of the preprocessed data is
required. This means that whenever you change some basic data or you download a new FTire version,
preprocessing will be repeated automatically, and the preprocessed data file saved in your current
working directory. You can (and should) replace the FTire data file in your database with this one,
without any loss of information.
From www.ftire.com, you can download a tool (being a member of FTire/tools) to carry out
preprocessing outside of Adams.
The FTire interface routine automatically recognizes whether several wheels of the car share the same
basic data file. In that case, preprocessing is done only once for all these files. Also, FTire automatically
recognizes whether the data file contains basic parameters or pre-processed ones.
FTire does not use the data in the section [VERTICAL]. It is only included for compatibility with other
tire models. It is recommended that you set Vertical_Stiffness to the value of
BDF_parameter Numerical parameter to control the internal
FTire implicit (BDF) integration scheme,
which is independent of the Adams
integrator.
0 = Euler explicit
0.5 = Trapezoidal rule
1 = Euler implicit
Theoretically, every value between 0 and 1
are allowed. 0.505 or greater is
recommended.
The parameter: Means:
Adams/Tire
276
stat_wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl, after dividing by 10 mm. For Vertical_Damping, choose 0 (or a small
nonzero value). The actual vertical damping of FTire is not just one single value, but will depend on
rolling speed, inflation pressure, load, camber, and so on.
The following is an examples of a basic FTire data file. Note that by far not all possible data are defined.
For examples, only data for one inflation pressure are provided.
$--------------------------------------------------------MDI_HEADER[MDI_HEADER] FILE_TYPE
= 'tir' FILE_VERSION = 4.0 FILE_FORMAT = 'ASCII'
(COMMENTS)comment_string 'Tire Manufacturer
- unknown' 'Tire Type
- unknown' 'Tire Dimension
- 195/65 R 15' 'Pressure
- 2.0 bar' 'File Generation Date - 03/03/11 10:32'$-------------------------------------------------------------SHAPE[SHAPE]radial width 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.41.0 0.90.9 1.0$-------------------------------------------------------------UNITS[UNITS] FORCE = 'NEWTON'MASS = 'GRAM'LENGTH = 'MM'TIME = 'MILLISECOND' ANGLE = 'DEGREE'$---------------------------------------------------------DIMENSION[DIMENSION] UNLOADED_RADIUS =
326.0 $ [mm]$----------------------------------------------------------VERTICAL[VERTICAL] VERTICAL_STIFFNESS =
170.0 $ [N/mm]VERTICAL_DAMPING =
0.0 $ [Nms/mm]$-------------------------------------------------------------MODEL[MODEL] PROPERTY_FILE_FORMAT =
'FTIRE' $
separate_animation =
277Tire Models
0 $ [0/1] additional_output_file =
0 $ [0/1]
verbose = 0
$ [0/1]$----------------------------------------------OPERATING_CONDITIONS[OPERATING_CONDITIONS] inflation_pressure =
2.0 $ [bar]
tread_depth = 8.0
$ [m] model_level =
7 $ [-]
$---------------------------------------------------------PARAMETER[FTIRE_DATA]$basic data and geometry ******************************************* tire_section_width =
195 $ [mm]
tire_aspect_ratio = 65
$ [%] rim_diameter =
381 $ [mm]
rim_width = 152.4
$ [mm]load_index =
91 $ [-]
rolling_circumference = 1975
$ [mm] tread_lat_curvature_radius = 800 $ [mm] tread_width =
160 $ [mm]
tire_mass = 9000
$ [g]interior_volume =
0.03e9 $ [mm^3] volume_gradient =
1.0 $ [%/mm] belt_torsion_lat_displ_coupl =
0.0 $ [deg/mm]
$
Adams/Tire
278
$static and modal data for 1st infl. pressure *********************** stat_wheel_load_at_10_mm_defl = 1690
$ [N] stat_wheel_load_at_20_mm_defl = 3600 $ [N]
dynamic_stiffening = 20
$ [%] speed_at_half_dyn_stiffening = 5.55
$ [mm/ms]=[m/s] radial_hysteretic_stiffening = 0
$ [%]radial_hysteresis_force =
0 $
[N] tang_hysteretic_stiffening = 0
$ [%]tang_hysteresis_force =
0 $ [N] belt_extension_at_200_kmh =
1.0 $ [%] rel_long_belt_memb_tension =
82.0 $ [%]
$f1 =
62.1 $ in-plane rotat. [Hz]
f2 = 81.4
$ in-plane transl. [Hz]f4 =
80.0 $ out-of-plane rotat. [Hz]
$D1 =
0.05 $ in-plane rotat. [-]
D2 = 0.08
$ in-plane transl. [-]D4 =
0.05 $ out-of-plane rotat. [-]
$belt_in_plane_bend_stiffn =
2.0e6 $ [Nmm^2] belt_out_of_plane_bend_stiffn = 200.0e6 $ [Nmm^2]
belt_lat_bend_stiffn = 20.0e6 $ [Nmm^2]
belt_twist_stiffn = 1.0e6
$ [Nmm^2/deg] belt_torsion_stiffn =
279Tire Models
100.0 $ [N/deg]
$rim_flange_contact_stiffness = 3000.0
$ [N/mm] rim_to_flat_tire_distance = 30.0
$ [mm]$$tread properties ************************************************** tread_depth =
8.0 $ [mm]
tread_base_height = 3.0
$ [mm] stiffness_tread_rubber = 64
$ [Shore A]tread_positive =
65 $ [%]
damping_tread_rubber = 0.025
$ [ms]
$sliding_velocity =
0.1 $ [mm/ms]
blocking_velocity = 50.0
$ [mm/ms]low_ground_pressure =
0.01 $ [bar]
med_ground_pressure = 2.0
$ [bar]high_ground_pressure =
10.0 $ [bar]
mu_adhesion_at_low_p = 1.3
$ [-]mu_sliding_at_low_p =
1.1 $ [-]
mu_blocking_at_low_p = 0.8
$ [-]mu_adhesion_at_med_p =
1.3 $ [-]
mu_sliding_at_med_p = 1.0
Adams/Tire
280
$ [-]mu_blocking_at_med_p =
0.8 $ [-]
mu_adhesion_at_high_p = 1.3
$ [-]mu_sliding_at_high_p =
1.0 $ [-]
mu_blocking_at_high_p = 0.8
$ [-]$$tire imperfections ************************************************ static_balance_weight =
0.0 $ [g] static_balance_ang_position = 0.0 $ [deg] dynamic_balance_weight =
0.0 $ [g] dynamic_balance_ang_position =
0.0 $ [deg]
radial_non_uniformity = 0.0
$ [%] radial_non_unif_ang_position = 0.0 $ [deg]
tang_non_uniformity = 0.0
$ [%] tang_non_unif_ang_position = 0.0
$ [deg] ply_steer_percentage =
0.0 $ [%] conicity =
0.0 $ [deg]
run_out = 0.0
$ [mm] run_out_angular_position = 0.0
$ [deg]$$measuring conditions ********************************************** inflation_pressure =
2.0 $ [bar]
rim_inertia = 0.25e9 $ [g*mm^2]
$
281Tire Models
$numerical data **************************************************** number_belt_segments =
80 $
number_blocks_per_belt_segm = 32 $
number_tread_strips = 8
$ maximum_time_step =
0.2 $ [ms]
BDF_parameter = 0.505
$ 0.5 .. 1.0 [-]
Choosing FTire Operating ConditionsYou can control certain tire data during a simulation, without rerunning preprocessing. These parameters,
listed below, are called operating condition parameters:
• Inflation pressure - The operating condition value of inflation_pressure defines the actual,
possibly time-dependent inflation pressure, whereas the [FTIRE_DATA] value describes the
inflation pressure at which the remainder of the data measurements had been taken.
• Tread depth -The operating condition value of tread_depth defines the actual, possibly time-
dependent tread depth, whereas the [FTIRE_DATA] value describes the tread depth at which the
remainder of the data measurements had been taken.
• Model level - The operating condition value of model_level defines what variant of FTire is to
be used: the basic version (=6) or the full 3D version (=7). The list of possible variants will be
extended in the next release.
Also in the next FTire release, ambient temperature, will be added to the list of operating conditions.
To determine the actual operating conditions, FTire looks for the section [OPERATING_CONDITIONS]
in the basic or preprocessed tire data file. If it does not find this section, or it does not contain the
respective definitions, FTire uses the data in the sections [FTIRE_DATA] or
[FTIRE_PREPROCESSED_DATA] as the measurement conditions.
In case the section [OPERATING_CONDITIONS] is defined, FTire first tries to read a constant value
for each operating condition. This value may either be the same for all tires using the data file, or it can
have individual values for each such tire instance.
You can enter constant operating conditions as shown the table below.
Adams/Tire
282
OPERATING_CONDITIONS Section Parameters
If no constant value is found, FTire looks for a table that is defining data points for operating condition
versus time. These data points then will be piecewise linearly interpolated with respect to simulation
time.
The parameter: Means:
inflation_pressure Actual inflation pressure, used for all FTire
instances that are parameterized by this
data file.
inflation_pressure_wheel_i Actual inflation pressure, used only for
FTire instance with GFORCE ID i. This
value overrides the inflation_pressure
value (i is to be replaced by a numerical
GFORCE ID value of the tire instance).
tread_depth Actual tread depth, used for all FTire
instances that are parameterized by this
data file.
tread_depth_wheel_i Actual tread depth, used only for FTire
instance with GFORCE ID i. This value
overrides the tread_depth value (i is to be
replaced by the numerical GFORCE ID
value of the tire instance).
model_level Actual model level, used for all FTire
instances that are parameterized by this
data file. In the current release, the
following model levels are implemented:
• 6: FTire basic version (three
degrees of freedom for each belt
element, one line of contact
elements.
• 7: FTire full 3D version (five
generalized degrees of freedom for
each belt element, several lines of,
or irregularly scattered, contact
elements).
model_level_wheel_i Actual model level, used for FTire instance
with GFORCE ID i. This value will
override the model_level value (’i’ is to be
replaced by the numerical GFORCE ID
value of the tire instance).
283Tire Models
You enter such look-up tables as subsections of the section [OPERATING_CONDITIONS]. These
subsections can each contain up to 200 data pairs, one pair per line. Every data pair consists of a value
for time and a corresponding value for the operating condition. Units are the same as for constant values.
Similarly as for constant values, tables which are valid for all tires, or individual tables for each instance
are allowed.
The names of these table subsections, with obvious meanings, are:
• (TIME_TABLE_INFLATION_PRESSURE)
• (TIME_TABLE_INFLATION_PRESSURE_WHEEL_ i)
• (TIME_TABLE_TREAD_DEPTH)
• (TIME_TABLE_TREAD_DEPTH_WHEEL_ i)
• (TIME_TABLE_MODEL_LEVEL)
• (TIME_TABLE_MODEL_LEVEL_WHEEL_ i)
The following examples defines a sudden pressure loss (between 5 and 5.2 s of simulation time) in tire
with GFORCE ID 2. In addition, it specifies constant inflation pressure (2.2 bar) for the other tires, and
a certain, equal and constant extreme tread wear (0.1 mm every100 s) for all tires. Model level is chosen
to be the full 3D variant for all tires at any time:
$------------------------------------------------------OPERATING_CONDITIONS[OPERATING_CONDITIONS]
MODEL_LEVEL = 7
INFLATION_PRESSURE_WHEEL_1 = 2.2INFLATION_PRESSURE_WHEEL_3 = 2.2INFLATION_PRESSURE_WHEEL_4 = 2.2
(TIME_TABLE_TREAD_DEPTH)0 8.0
100 7.9
(TIME_TABLE_INFLATION_PRESSURE_WHEEL_2)0
2.2
5 2.2
5.2 1.2
Adams/Tire
284
Note: If you use the preprocessed data file in subsequent simulations, don't forget to copy the
[operating_conditions] section from the basic data file manually into the preprocessed data
file. This is not done automatically, because tire operating conditions are not considered to
be part of the tire data.
top related