accreditation

ACCREDITATION

PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT & COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ATMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

8.20.09W. Agnew

UPDATE

Accreditation Update

Spring, 2009

May, 2009

July, 2009

August, 2009

Spring, 2009

Redesign announced by NCATE

Accreditation Update

Spring, 2009

May, 2009

July, 2009

August, 2009

May-June, 2009Redesign accepted with focus on. . .

Continuous Improvementand

Transformation Initiatives

Accreditation Update

Spring, 2009

May, 2009

July, 2009

August, 2009

July, 2009

Transformation Initiative Meeting

Donna Gollnick, Senior Vice President NCATE

Hap Hairston, DESESpringfield Schools

Baptist Bible CollegeEvangel University

Drury University andMissouri State

University

July, 2009Transformation Initiative Meeting

Joint Transformation ProjectTeacher Education Alliance

(TEA Project)

Accreditation Update

Spring, 2009

May, 2009

July, 2009

August, 2009

August, 2009Accreditation at MSU SPAs changing SPAs optional

SPAs encouraged because of national recognition

SPAs requirements make it easier to complete MoSTEP requirements.

MoSTEP checklist

Accreditation Update

Looking Ahead

Accreditation Update

Sept., 2009

Oct., 2009

Nov., 2009

Feb., 2010

September, 2009

MSU along with other project participants have been invited to present the TEA (AYP) project at AACTE/NCATE National Conference.

Accreditation Update

Sept., 2009

Oct., 2009

Nov., 2009

Feb., 2010

October, 2009October 1, 2009 Report intent to complete SPA or elect to

opt out email Vicki Simons

Opting out or no SPA Begin preliminary review of MoSTEP

requirements MoSTEP template from Dr. Agnew by October

1.

Accreditation Update

Sept., 2009

Oct., 2009

Nov., 2009

Feb., 2010

November, 2009NCATE Web Seminar November 18 and 19, 2009 Addresses the online writing

of Institutional Reports according to the streamlined process 

Additional info--MSU Accreditation Website

Accreditation Update

Sept., 2009

Oct., 2009

Nov., 2009

Feb., 2010

February, 2010SPAs reports due

OR

MoSTEP preliminary report due

Accreditation Update

A look at NCATE Transformation Initiative requirements

MSU Transformation Initiative

TEA/AYP Project with

Springfield Public Schools and other Universities

Transformation Initiative

Focus--Improvement in educator preparation program that can provide leadership to the field.

MSU Transformation Initiative

Highly qualified teachers and other school professionals for high-needs schools.

Responds to the need for. . .

MSU Transformation Initiative

Improvement in P-12 student learning across diverse populations as America becomes a more heterogeneous society.

Responds to the need for. . .

MSU Transformation Initiative

More clinically-based programs to help increase teacher experience and effectiveness with diverse populations, and for coordinated approaches to the induction and retention of new teachers and other school professionals.

Responds to the need for. . .

MSU Transformation Initiative

Recognition that educator preparation and school reform are inextricably bound together. Therefore, educators must be prepared both as individually skilled practitioners as well as professionals oriented toward ongoing school improvement.

Responds to the challenge of. . .

Focus on continuous improvement and report on changes since the previous visit, linked to NCATE six standards in the Institutional Report

Submit electronically Report reviewed by pre-visit BOE committee Feedback provided to the unit allowing time

to focus on area of concerns

NCATE Mid-cycle Report

25 page limit submitted with the mid-cycle report

Report includes• Problem(s) to be addressed• Goals• Beliefs• Plan

Transformation Initiative Proposal

The Process—BOE Committee Review Committee and representative from the

state partnership reviews unit reports, annual reports, Title II data and national or state program reports

Feedback to unit on concerns Committee decides eligibility based on

likelihood of continuing to meet standards

Transformation Initiative

The Process--After Approval of TI Committee on Transformation Initiatives (CTI)

formed• reviews proposal• consults with institution on modification of proposal• recommends approval to Unit Accreditation Board

(UAB)• consultant identified to review unit’s

implementation. • No additional institution report required• Transformation Initiative Visit (7th year)

Transformation Initiative

The Process--Unit engages and finishes Initiative

Submit final report, including evaluation of results

Consultant reviews final report Consultant report submitted to CTI and UAB

with recommendation whether results should be propagated to the field

Unit receives a Commendation for Leadership in the Field

Transformation Initiative

Assessments STEPS System--California State University

Surveys through STEPS and InQsit

Move toward the NCATE Transition Points system

SharePoint Server—Depository for exhibits PEU2 (SharePoint Server)

Accreditation activities & future plans. . .

Dean’s Monday Communiqué & MSU Accreditation Website

NCATE and MoSTEPFall, 2009

MoSTEP review process SPA writing process Institutional Report Draft Transformation Initiative Proposal Assessment System Review